View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 ICC Proposed Photoelectric Smoke Alarm Legislation 04Dec13
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/icc-proposed-photoelectric-smoke-alarm-legislation-04dec13 1/2
Indianappolis City Counci l
to Consider Changes in
Smoke Detector Law
“I want to go one step further . . . the photoelectric
I believe will give people more chance - more time
to leave their home safely.”
See WTHR’s 2007 ~ 2009 ‘Deadly Delay’ TV Series
Exposing Ionization Smoke Alarms
www.theWFSF.org/DeadlyDelay
Cr Christine Scales, Indianapolis City Council Member
, 04 Dec 2013, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
“We have five million smoke detectors in this state that are ionization smoke detectors that may fail in the time of need.”
Roger Johnson
Roger Johnson, Indiana State Fire Marshal 2005 ~ 2008 from WTHR Eyewitness NewsInvestigation’s nine part, two year, ‘Deadly Delay’ TV smoke alarm exposé April, 2007 ~ June, 2009.
ICCProposedSmokeAlarmLegislation04Dec13.pdf | Updated 10 Dec 2013 - Check for Latest Version: www.Scribd.com/doc/190532422 1 of 2
7/27/2019 ICC Proposed Photoelectric Smoke Alarm Legislation 04Dec13
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/icc-proposed-photoelectric-smoke-alarm-legislation-04dec13 2/2
“Fire Protection Association Australia
recommends installing a photoelectricsmoke alarm in each bedroom, incorridors and hallways that lead to
exits and the living area. Chubb strongly
recommends that both ionisation and
photoelectric smoke alarms be installed tohelp ensure maximum detection of the
various types of fires that occur within thehome. For greater protection also install
Quell Fire Extinguishers and Quell FireBlankets.”
WTHR NEWS: Indianappolis City Council to
Consider Changes in Smoke Detector Law04 December, 2013
www.wthr.com/story/24127853/2013/12/03/council-to-consider-changes-in-smoke-detector-law
10 December, 2013
Roger JohnsonPresident, Indiana Fire Fighters AssociationIndiana, USA
Good Morning Roger,
This message is further to WTHR’s ‘Council to Consider Change to Smoke Detector Law’ news item with Bob Segall’s Aquarium 2007 Test vindicating all the work you and WTHR have done in educating fire fighters about ionization alarmsand the safe photoelectric alternatives. Councillor Christine Scales is correct when she said, “I want to go one stepfurther . . . the photoelectric I believe will give people more chance more time to leave their home safely.”
This begs the question, (and I know you know the answer!), “Are Ionization Smoke Alarms Defective?”
I recently purchased a Quell Q946 ionization smoke alarm (see below). The Quell, Chubb & Kidde brands are owned byUnited Technologies Corporation (UTC). A Q946 alarm is installed in my local member of Parliament’s home, Mr ChrisGulaptis. He requested the smoke obscuration level his alarm activates under Australian Standards smoke alarm testing
from UTC's Australian President. After four Open Letters to UTC, in his speech in the Australian Parliament (20 June,2013) Mr Gulaptis asked the question, “Are Ionization Smoke Alarms Defective?” Open Letters to UTC’s U.S. & Australian Presidents are here: www.SmokeAlarmWarning.org/theopenletters.html
As at the date of this email, UTC’s US President, Mr Chênevert has failed to respond. Mr Gulaptis asked Mr Chênevert toanswer the same simple request he had asked his Australasian President, Mr Mark Brisson. i.e. "What level of visiblesmoke did my ionization smoke alarm activate under Australian Standards testing?" Please note thedisclaimer written on the UTC/Quell Q946 smoke alarm packaging below.
The Ohio Fire Chief’s Association’s official position to recommend photoelectric smoke alarms (November, 2013) concurswith positions taken by Cincinnati City Council, OFCA, the IAFF, AFAC, several US States and numerous Californian andOhioan municipalities who now all recommend photoelectric smoke alarms.
Sincerely,
Adrian Butler The World Fire Safety FoundationChairman, Co-Founder, Former Fire Fighter
(emphasis added)
UTC’s IonizationSmokeAlarm Disclosure
Quell (UTC) Q946 Ionization Smoke Alarm
ICCProposedSmokeAlarmLegislation04Dec13.pdf | Updated 10 Dec 2013 - Check for Latest Version: www.Scribd.com/doc/190532422 2 of 2