50
IBD scoring systems Lara Hart, MD FRCPC 1,2 Talat Bessissow, MD FRCPC 1 Mallory Chavannes, MD FRCPC 3,4 1. McGill University Health Center, Montreal QC; 2. McMaster University Medical Center, Hamilton ON; 3. St-Paul’s Hospital, University of BriGsh Columbia, Vancouver, BC; 4. CHU Sainte JusGne, University of Montreal, Montreal QC

IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

  • Upload
    lyanh

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

IBD scoring systems

Lara Hart, MD FRCPC1,2

Talat Bessissow, MD FRCPC1

Mallory Chavannes, MD FRCPC3,4

1.McGillUniversityHealthCenter,MontrealQC;2.McMasterUniversityMedicalCenter,HamiltonON;3.St-Paul’sHospital,UniversityofBriGshColumbia,Vancouver,

BC;4.CHUSainteJusGne,UniversityofMontreal,MontrealQC

Page 2: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

ObjecFves

Attheendofthisprogram,par2cipantsshouldbeableto…• DifferenGatebetweenthevariousIBDscoringsystems• UnderstandtheuGlityofthescoringsystemsandthegradingofseverityassociatedwitheachscore

• Usethescoringsystemsinendoscopyreports

Page 3: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Conflict of Interest Disclosure (over the past 24 months)

Commercial or Non-Profit Interest Relationship

Abbvie Research support

Name: Dr. Lara Hart

Page 4: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Conflict of Interest Disclosure (over the past 24 months)

Commercial or Non-Profit Interest Relationship

Abbvie Speaker, advisory board, research support

Janssen Speaker, research support

Takeda Speaker, advisory board

Ferring, Shire, Pendopharm, Merck

Speaker

Pfizer advisory board

Pentax Research support

Name: Dr. Talat Bessissow

Page 5: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Commercial or Non-Profit Interest Relationship

Abbvie Research support

Name: Dr. Mallory Chavannes

Conflict of Interest Disclosure (over the past 24 months)

Page 6: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

X Medical Expert (as Medical Experts, physicians integrate all of the CanMEDS Roles, applying medical knowledge, clinical skills, and professional values in their provision of high-quality and safe patient-centered care. Medical Expert is the central physician Role in the CanMEDS Framework and defines the physician’s clinical scope of practice.)

X Communicator (as Communicators, physicians form relationships with patients and their families that facilitate the gathering and sharing of essential information for effective health care.)

Collaborator (as Collaborators, physicians work effectively with other health care professionals to provide safe, high-quality, patient-centred care.)

X Leader (as Leaders, physicians engage with others to contribute to a vision of a high-quality health care system and take responsibility for the delivery of excellent patient care through their activities as clinicians, administrators, scholars, or teachers.)

X Health Advocate (as Health Advocates, physicians contribute their expertise and influence as they work with communities or patient populations to improve health. They work with those they serve to determine and understand needs, speak on behalf of others when required, and support the mobilization of resources to effect change.)

X Scholar (as Scholars, physicians demonstrate a lifelong commitment to excellence in practice through continuous learning and by teaching others, evaluating evidence, and contributing to scholarship.)

Professional (as Professionals, physicians are committed to the health and well-being of individual patients and society through ethical practice, high personal standards of behaviour, accountability to the profession and society, physician-led regulation, and maintenance of personal health.)

CanMEDS Roles Covered

Page 7: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Histologicalremission1,2

Mucosalhealing2,3

Biochemicalremission

Clinicalremission(steroid-Free)

Clinicalresponse

Therapeu?cobjec?veevolveastreatment

goalschange

EvoluFon of treatment targets

1.  MolanderP,etal.JCrohnsColi/s2013.2.  VillanacciV,etal.WorldJGastroenterol2013;19:968–78.3.  LaharieD,etal.AlimentPharmTherap2013.

Page 8: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Symptom-free CRP 36 mg/L

Page 9: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Poor correlaFon symptoms – mucosal lesions

•  Complete lack of correlation between CDAI (primarily symptom-based) and endoscopic inflammation

•  Symptoms and signs of Crohn’s are neither sensitive nor specific

Modigliani R et al, Gastroenterology 1990

Page 10: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

CorrelaFon symptoms –UC

Severe

0 20 40 60 80 100

Mild–moderate

Remission

Clinicalstate

Severe

0 20 40 60 80 100

Mild–moderate

Normal

SigmoidoscopicstateNoneMild–moderateSevere

TrueloveSC,etal.BrMedJ1956;1:1315–8

Histologicalfindings:Degreeofinflamma?on

Page 11: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

CD Scoring Systems- CDEIS (1989)

MaryJYetal.Gut1989;30:983-9.

Page 12: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

CD Scoring Systems- SES-CD (2004)

DapernoMetal.GIE2004;60(4):505-12.

InacGve=0–2;mild=3–6;moderate7–15;severe>16DefiniGonofMHvaries

Page 13: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Rutgeerts score (1990)

Sostegnietal.APT2003;17:11-7.

Page 14: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

CD scoring systems

Scoringsystem Strength Weakness

CDEIS GoldstandardValidatedProspecGvestudyExtensivelyappliedinclinicaltrials

ComplexityNodefiniGonofMHNocorrelaGonwithCDAI

SES-CD ValidatedProspecGvestudySimplerthanCDEISCorrelatedwithCDEIS

NodefiniGonofMHNocorrelaGonwithCDAILessappliedinclinicaltrials

Rutgeertsscore ProspecGvestudyExtensivelyappliedinclinicaltrialsStrongprognosGcrelevance

NoformalvalidaGonOnlyinpost-operaGveileo-colonicresecGon

DapernoMetal.GIE2004;60(4):505-12.

Page 15: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

UC Scoring systems Index Validated Variables Strengths Weaknesses

TrueloveandWibsEndoscopyIndex

No Granularity,hyperemia Precedence(firstreportedindex),butnoothermerit

Nodescrip?onofendoscopiclesionssointer-observervariabilityishigh

BaronIndex No Bleeding,vascularpabern,friability Easytouse Ulcera?onsnotincludedinscore;nodefini?onofmucosalhealing

Powell-TuckIndex No Bleeding Easytouse Ulcera?onnotincluded,nodefini?onofmucosalhealing

SutherlandIndex No Friability,bleeding,exuda?on Easytouse,overlapindescrip?vetermsfordifferentlevelsofac?vity

Subjec?ve,nodefini?onofmucosalhealing

MayoClinicIndex(endoscopicsubscore)

No Vascularpabern,erythema,friability,erosionsandulcera?on,bleeding

Easytouse,commonlyusedinclinicaltrials;overlapindescrip?vetermsusedfordifferentlevelsofac?vity

Novalidateddefini?onofmucosalhealing;Thetermminimalorslightfriabilityissubjec?veandleadstoinconsistentresults

RachmilewitzIndex No Granula?on,mucosaldamage,vascularpabern,vulnerabilityofmucosa(bleeding)

Nonereported Complexandsubjec?vedescrip?veterms

ModifiedBaronIndex No Vascularpabern,granularity,friability,bleeding,ulcera?on Easytouse Novalidateddefini?onofmucosalhealing

EndoscopicAc?vityIndex

No Sizeofulcers(4levels),depthofulcers(4levels),redness(3levels),bleeding(4levels),mucosaledema(4levels),mucosalexudate(3levels)

Closelycorrelatedwithclinicalac?vity.Comparabletootherindices.Usefulinseveredisease

MabsIndex No Granularity,bleeding,edema,ulcera?on Easytouse

Ulcera?veColi?sEndoscopicIndexofSeverity

Preliminary Vascularpabern(3levels),bleeding(4levels),ulcera?on(4levels)

Easytouse;Independentofclinicalsymptoms,accountsfor88%ofvaria?onbetweenobservers

Sensi?vitytochange,andmucosalhealingremainundefined

WalshA,etal.Gastrointest.EndoscClin.N.Am.2014;24:367–78.

Page 16: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

UC Scoring systems- Mayo score (1987)

Mayoindex 0 1 2 3

Stoolfrequency Normal 1–2/day>normal 3–4/day>normal 5/day>normal

Rectalbleeding None Streaks Obvious Mostlyblood

Mucosa Normal Mildfriability Moderatefriability Spontaneousbleeding

Physician’sglobalassessment Normal Mild Moderate Severe

SchroederKW,etal.NEnglJMed1987;317:1625–9

0=inacGvedisease;1=milddisease;2=moderatedisease;3=severedisease.Mucosalhealing=0or1

Page 17: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

UC Scoring systems- UCEIS (2012)

Descriptor(scoremostseverelesions)

Likertscaleanchorpoints Defini?on

Vascularpabern

Normal(1) Normalvascularpabernwitharborisa?onofcapillariesclearlydefined,orwithblurringorpatchylossofcapillarymargins

Patchyoblitera?on(2) Patchyoblitera?onofvascularpabern

Obliterated(3) Completeoblitera?onofvascularpabern

Bleeding

None(1) Novisibleblood

Mucosal(2) Somespotsorstreaksofcoagulatedbloodonthesurfaceofthemucosaaheadofthescope,whichcanbewashedaway

Luminalmild(3) Somefreeliquidbloodinthelumen

Luminalmoderateorsevere(4)

Frankbloodinthelumenaheadofendoscopeorvisibleoozingfrommucosaanerwashingintra-luminalblood,orvisibleoozingfromahaemorrhagicmucosa

Erosionsandulcers

None(1) Normalmucosa,novisibleerosionsorulcers

Erosions(2) Tiny(≤5mm)defectsinthemucosa,ofawhiteoryellowcolourwithaflatedge

Superficialulcer(3) Larger(>5mm)defectsinthemucosa,whicharediscretefibrin-coveredulcersincomparisonwitherosions,butremainsuperficial

Deepulcer(4) Deeperexcavateddefectsinthemucosa,withaslightlyraisededge

TravisSPL,etal.Gut2012;61:535–42

*ThresholdforMH,mild,moderateandseverediseasenotset

Page 18: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Scoring systems current use and reliability

Page 19: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC)

• UsedforobjecGveassessmentofendoscopicimprovement•  Interrateragreementpoorbetweensitereaderandcentralreaders(ICC0.11to0.44)buthighbetweencentralreadersinUC

FeaganBG,etal.Gastroenterol2013;145(1):149-157

Page 20: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (CD)

• Bederinter-observercorrelaGonusingSES-CDandCDEIS

RutgeertsP,etal.Gastrointes/nalEndoscopy2016;83(1):188-197

Page 21: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

•  129staffphysicians•  116treaGngadults(90%)•  78fromacademiccenters(60%)•  52performed>750colonoscopies/year(40%)•  38had>20yearsinpracGce(29%)

•  47fellowsreplies•  21werePGY-5(45%)•  13performed>400colonoscopies/year(28%)

Hartetal,Unpublisheddata

Canadian Survey: Do you see what I see

Page 22: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Use of IBD scores in clinical pracFce

Staff(n=129)

Residents(n=47)

All(n=176)

UsingSES-CD,n(%) 41(32) 26(55) 67(38)

UsingCDEIS,n(%) 3(2) 1(2) 4(2)

UsingMayo,n(%) 114(88) 42(89) 156(89)

ComfortusingCDscore,n(%) 65(50) 12(25) 77(44)

ComfortusingUCscore,n(%) 111(86) 37(79) 148(84)

Hartetal,Unpublisheddata

Page 23: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Why are physicians using scores ≤50% of Fme

Staff(n=129)

Residents(n=47)

All(n=176)

Notfamiliar,n(%) 10(8) 4(9) 14(8)

Forgettouse,n(%) 11(9) 2(4) 13(7)

Ratherdescribe,n(%) 37(29) 13(28) 50(28)

Timeconsuming,n(%) 2(2) 3(6) 5(3)

Toocomplicated,n(%) 9(7) 4(9) 13(7)

Nottrained,n(%) 1(1) 3(6) 4(2)

Hartetal,Unpublisheddata

Page 24: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Cases – pracFce using the scoring systems

Page 25: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Case 1 (UC)

•  20yopaGenthashad2yearhistoryofulceraGvecoliGs.Taking5ASA.Startedexperiencingprogressivelyworseningsymptoms;nowhaving8-12loosebloodybowelmovementsperday.FC>2100,stoolforinfecGousworkupnegaGve.CRP55,Hgb109,albumin33.Youdocolonoscopyandsee..

Page 26: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

How would you describe the colon?

-  Mucopus

-  Erythema-  Lossofvascularmarkings-  UlceraGons

-  Edema-  Friability

HowsevereistheinflammaGon?Whatmayoendoscopicscorewoulditbe?

Page 27: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Using the MES

MES3

SchroederKW,etal.NEnglJMed1987;317:1625–9

Page 28: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Case 2 (UC)

•  18yoMwithUCwhohasbeenoninfliximabsincehisdiagnosis2yearsago.Receives7.5mg/Kgq5weeks.Symptomsaremanageablewith3semi-formedBMperdayandnobloodandaCRP=6.RecentfecalcalprotecGnimprovedfrom1800to965.Colonoscopytoreassessdiseaseshowsthis…

Page 29: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

How would you describe the colon?

-  Erythema-  Lossofvascularmarkings

-  Mucopus

-  Granularity

-  ConGnuousinflammaGon

HowsevereistheinflammaGon?Whatmayoendoscopicscorewoulditbe?

Page 30: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Using the MES

MES2

SchroederKW,etal.NEnglJMed1987;317:1625–9

Page 31: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Case 3 (CD)

•  40yopaGentknowtohaveileocolonicCDfor2years.Onadalimumabmonotherapy40mgq1wkforthepastyear(noprevioususeofinfliximab).Worseningsymptomsofdiarrheaandweightlossoverthelast6weeks.CRP15.FC700.YouscopetoreassessdiseaseacGvityandseethis…

Page 32: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

How would you describe the colon?

-  Deepulcers

-  Linear/serpiginousulcers

-  Erythema

-  Edema

-  Aphthousulcers

-  PatchyinflammaGon

HowsevereistheinflammaGon?WhatSES-CDscorewoulditbe?

Whatpercentofthesurfaceisulcerated?Whatpercentofthesurfaceisaffected?

Page 33: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Using the SES-CD

SES-CD7-8

DapernoMetal.GIE2004;60(4):505-12.

Page 34: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Case 4 CD

•  40yopaGentknownfora10yearhistoryofileocolonicCrohn’sdisease.Compliantwithazathioprinetherapyandachievinggoodlevels(6TG330).Worseningsymptomsoverthepastfewmonths.Hgb90,Plt713,WBC4.2,lymphocytes0.3.CRP30.FC1070.2-3loosestoolsperday,withnewonsetbleedingbutmaintainingweight/appeGte.Youscopeandfind…

Page 35: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

How would you describe the colon?

HowsevereistheinflammaGon?WhatSES-CDscorewoulditbe?

-  Deeplinearulcers

-  Edema

-  Possiblenarrowingofthelumen

-  Scaderedaphthousulcersandmucopus

Whatpercentofthesurfaceisulcerated?Whatpercentofthesurfaceisaffected?

Page 36: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Using the SES-CD

SES-CD9-10

DapernoMetal.GIE2004;60(4):505-12.

Page 37: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Case 5 CD

•  20yopaGenthashad5yearsofileocolonicCD,oninfliximabfor2years,currentlyon5mg/kgq6wk.Recentincreaseinfrequencyofbowelmovements,withoccasionaldiarrhea.Normalbloodwork.FC335.Oncolonoscopy,thecolonlookedlikethis…

Page 38: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

How would you describe the colon?

HowsevereistheinflammaGon?WhatSES-CDscorewoulditbe?

-  Erythema

-  Aphthousulcers

Whatpercentofthesurfaceisulcerated?Whatpercentofthesurfaceisaffected?

Page 39: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Using the SES-CD

SES-CD4-5

DapernoMetal.GIE2004;60(4):505-12.

Page 40: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Case 6 (post-operaFve)

40yopaGenthashad5yearsofileocolonicCD.PresentedwithobstrucGvesymptomsandwasfoundtohavestrictureatTI.PaGenthadanileocecalresecGonandhadarepeatscopetoassessanastomosissite…

Page 41: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Using Rutgeerts’ score

Sostegnietal.APT2003;17:11-7.

Rutgeerts’i1

Page 42: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

MES quick cases

MES1 MES0

MES2 MES3

Page 43: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

SES-CD quick cases

SES-CD10-12

SES-CD7-9

SES-CD0

SES-CD4-6

Page 44: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Using the UCEIS

UCEIS7

TravisSPL,etal.Gut2012;61:535–42

Page 45: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Using the UCEIS

UCEIS3-4

TravisSPL,etal.Gut2012;61:535–42

Page 46: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Using the CDEIS

Feature Scoring

DeepulceraGons 0=no,12=yes

SuperficialulceraGons 0=no,6=yes

Surfaceinvolvedindisease 1pointperevery10%

SurfaceinvolvedinulceraGons 1pointperevery10%

Ulceratedstenosisornon-ulceratedstenosis Add3points

CDEIS24-25

MaryJYetal.Gut1989;30:983-9.

Page 47: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Using the CDEIS

Feature Scoring

DeepulceraGons 0=no,12=yes

SuperficialulceraGons 0=no,6=yes

Surfaceinvolvedindisease 1pointperevery10%

SurfaceinvolvedinulceraGons 1pointperevery10%

Ulceratedstenosisornon-ulceratedstenosis Add3points

CDEIS10-11

MaryJYetal.Gut1989;30:983-9.

Page 48: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Using the CDEIS

Feature Scoring

DeepulceraGons 0=no,12=yes

SuperficialulceraGons 0=no,6=yes

Surfaceinvolvedindisease 1pointperevery10%

SurfaceinvolvedinulceraGons 1pointperevery10%

Ulceratedstenosisornon-ulceratedstenosis Add3points

CDEIS33

MaryJYetal.Gut1989;30:983-9.

Page 49: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

Resources

•  IGIBDscoresapp•  IBDScoresapp• CAG/AbbvieSEEMLI:StandardizingtheEndoscopicEvaluaGonofMucosalLesionsinIBD:www.seemli.ca

Page 50: IBD scoring systems - cag-acg.org · Use of IBD scores within clinical trials (UC) • Used for objecGve assessment of endoscopic improvement • Interrater agreement poor between

PleasedownloadtheCDDW™apptocompletethesessionevaluaGonandtoreceiveyourcerGficateofadendance.

Evaluation and Certificate of Attendance