Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG)
October 2014
ianacgorg
Transition backgroundbull In March 2014 NTIA 13ndash Announced intention to transition stewardship
of IANA functions13ndash Asked ICANN to convene global stakeholders
to develop a proposal to transition the current role played by NTIA13
bull ICANN-initiated community process resulted in creation of IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG)13
2
ICG
3
ALAC
ASO
ccNSO
GAC
GNSO
gTLD registries
ICCBASIS
IAB
IETF
ISOC
NRO
RSSAC
SSAC
ICANN board liaison
IANA staff liaison
ICG
4
ALAC
ASO
ccNSO
GAC
GNSO
gTLD registries
ICCBASIS
IAB
IETF
ISOC
NRO
RSSAC
SSAC
ICANN board liaison
IANA staff liaison
CoordinateLiaise
AssessAssemble
Inform
No proposal development
Focus of transitionbull IANA functions currently specified in NTIA
contract IANA activities related to13ndash Protocol parameters registry management13ndash DNS root zone management13ndash Internet numbers registry management13
bull Stewardship (not policy development etc)13
5
Transition proposal development
6
RIRcommunities
IETFcommunity
Naming CWG
Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13
ICG13Communities13
7
Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13
ICG13Communities13
NTIA138
Referencesbull FAQ
httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13
bull ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13
13bull RFP
httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13
13bull Timeline13
ndash Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13
ndash Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13
13bull Mailing list archive13
ndash httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 9
Reference slides
10
Community proposal elements bull IANA functions category and community use13bull Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13
bull Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks
legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13
bull How NTIA criteria were met13bull Community process and consensus level13
11
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
Transition backgroundbull In March 2014 NTIA 13ndash Announced intention to transition stewardship
of IANA functions13ndash Asked ICANN to convene global stakeholders
to develop a proposal to transition the current role played by NTIA13
bull ICANN-initiated community process resulted in creation of IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG)13
2
ICG
3
ALAC
ASO
ccNSO
GAC
GNSO
gTLD registries
ICCBASIS
IAB
IETF
ISOC
NRO
RSSAC
SSAC
ICANN board liaison
IANA staff liaison
ICG
4
ALAC
ASO
ccNSO
GAC
GNSO
gTLD registries
ICCBASIS
IAB
IETF
ISOC
NRO
RSSAC
SSAC
ICANN board liaison
IANA staff liaison
CoordinateLiaise
AssessAssemble
Inform
No proposal development
Focus of transitionbull IANA functions currently specified in NTIA
contract IANA activities related to13ndash Protocol parameters registry management13ndash DNS root zone management13ndash Internet numbers registry management13
bull Stewardship (not policy development etc)13
5
Transition proposal development
6
RIRcommunities
IETFcommunity
Naming CWG
Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13
ICG13Communities13
7
Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13
ICG13Communities13
NTIA138
Referencesbull FAQ
httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13
bull ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13
13bull RFP
httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13
13bull Timeline13
ndash Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13
ndash Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13
13bull Mailing list archive13
ndash httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 9
Reference slides
10
Community proposal elements bull IANA functions category and community use13bull Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13
bull Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks
legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13
bull How NTIA criteria were met13bull Community process and consensus level13
11
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
ICG
3
ALAC
ASO
ccNSO
GAC
GNSO
gTLD registries
ICCBASIS
IAB
IETF
ISOC
NRO
RSSAC
SSAC
ICANN board liaison
IANA staff liaison
ICG
4
ALAC
ASO
ccNSO
GAC
GNSO
gTLD registries
ICCBASIS
IAB
IETF
ISOC
NRO
RSSAC
SSAC
ICANN board liaison
IANA staff liaison
CoordinateLiaise
AssessAssemble
Inform
No proposal development
Focus of transitionbull IANA functions currently specified in NTIA
contract IANA activities related to13ndash Protocol parameters registry management13ndash DNS root zone management13ndash Internet numbers registry management13
bull Stewardship (not policy development etc)13
5
Transition proposal development
6
RIRcommunities
IETFcommunity
Naming CWG
Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13
ICG13Communities13
7
Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13
ICG13Communities13
NTIA138
Referencesbull FAQ
httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13
bull ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13
13bull RFP
httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13
13bull Timeline13
ndash Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13
ndash Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13
13bull Mailing list archive13
ndash httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 9
Reference slides
10
Community proposal elements bull IANA functions category and community use13bull Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13
bull Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks
legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13
bull How NTIA criteria were met13bull Community process and consensus level13
11
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
ICG
4
ALAC
ASO
ccNSO
GAC
GNSO
gTLD registries
ICCBASIS
IAB
IETF
ISOC
NRO
RSSAC
SSAC
ICANN board liaison
IANA staff liaison
CoordinateLiaise
AssessAssemble
Inform
No proposal development
Focus of transitionbull IANA functions currently specified in NTIA
contract IANA activities related to13ndash Protocol parameters registry management13ndash DNS root zone management13ndash Internet numbers registry management13
bull Stewardship (not policy development etc)13
5
Transition proposal development
6
RIRcommunities
IETFcommunity
Naming CWG
Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13
ICG13Communities13
7
Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13
ICG13Communities13
NTIA138
Referencesbull FAQ
httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13
bull ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13
13bull RFP
httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13
13bull Timeline13
ndash Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13
ndash Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13
13bull Mailing list archive13
ndash httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 9
Reference slides
10
Community proposal elements bull IANA functions category and community use13bull Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13
bull Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks
legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13
bull How NTIA criteria were met13bull Community process and consensus level13
11
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
Focus of transitionbull IANA functions currently specified in NTIA
contract IANA activities related to13ndash Protocol parameters registry management13ndash DNS root zone management13ndash Internet numbers registry management13
bull Stewardship (not policy development etc)13
5
Transition proposal development
6
RIRcommunities
IETFcommunity
Naming CWG
Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13
ICG13Communities13
7
Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13
ICG13Communities13
NTIA138
Referencesbull FAQ
httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13
bull ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13
13bull RFP
httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13
13bull Timeline13
ndash Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13
ndash Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13
13bull Mailing list archive13
ndash httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 9
Reference slides
10
Community proposal elements bull IANA functions category and community use13bull Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13
bull Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks
legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13
bull How NTIA criteria were met13bull Community process and consensus level13
11
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
Transition proposal development
6
RIRcommunities
IETFcommunity
Naming CWG
Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13
ICG13Communities13
7
Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13
ICG13Communities13
NTIA138
Referencesbull FAQ
httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13
bull ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13
13bull RFP
httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13
13bull Timeline13
ndash Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13
ndash Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13
13bull Mailing list archive13
ndash httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 9
Reference slides
10
Community proposal elements bull IANA functions category and community use13bull Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13
bull Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks
legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13
bull How NTIA criteria were met13bull Community process and consensus level13
11
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
Target13 Sep-1413 Nov-1413 Jan-1513 13Request for Proposals13 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13
ICG13Communities13
7
Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13
ICG13Communities13
NTIA138
Referencesbull FAQ
httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13
bull ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13
13bull RFP
httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13
13bull Timeline13
ndash Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13
ndash Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13
13bull Mailing list archive13
ndash httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 9
Reference slides
10
Community proposal elements bull IANA functions category and community use13bull Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13
bull Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks
legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13
bull How NTIA criteria were met13bull Community process and consensus level13
11
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
Target13 Jan-1513 Mar-1513 May-1513 Jun-1513 Jul-1513 Sept-1513 13Communities Develop Proposals13 13 13 13 13 13ICG Develops Draft Response13 13 13 13 13 13Review of the Draft Response13ICG Develops Final Response13Final Response Review13Final Response Delivery13Testing13NTIA Review13
ICG13Communities13
NTIA138
Referencesbull FAQ
httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13
bull ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13
13bull RFP
httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13
13bull Timeline13
ndash Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13
ndash Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13
13bull Mailing list archive13
ndash httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 9
Reference slides
10
Community proposal elements bull IANA functions category and community use13bull Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13
bull Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks
legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13
bull How NTIA criteria were met13bull Community process and consensus level13
11
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
Referencesbull FAQ
httpswwwicannorgresourcespagesicg-faqs-2014-10-10-en 13
bull ICG Charterhttpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilescharter-icg-27aug14-enpdf 13
13bull RFP
httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesrfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-enpdf13
13bull Timeline13
ndash Description httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-08sep14-enpdf 13
ndash Graphic httpswwwicannorgensystemfilesfilesicg-process-timeline-graphic-10sep14-enxlsx 13
13bull Mailing list archive13
ndash httpmmicannorgpipermailinternal-cg 13 9
Reference slides
10
Community proposal elements bull IANA functions category and community use13bull Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13
bull Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks
legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13
bull How NTIA criteria were met13bull Community process and consensus level13
11
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
Reference slides
10
Community proposal elements bull IANA functions category and community use13bull Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13
bull Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks
legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13
bull How NTIA criteria were met13bull Community process and consensus level13
11
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
Community proposal elements bull IANA functions category and community use13bull Existing pre-transition arrangements13ndash Policy oversight accountability13
bull Post-transition oversight and accountability13bull Transition implications13ndash Operational requirements and continuity risks
legal framework requirements workability evaluation expected timeline13
bull How NTIA criteria were met13bull Community process and consensus level13
11
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
1 Individual proposal assessment 13ndash Completeness13ndash Clarity13ndash NTIA criteria met13ndash Community comments
accommodated13ndash Consensus level achieved13ndash Inclusiveness of community process13
12
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal
2 Unified proposal assessment13ndash Compatability and interoperability13ndash Gapsoverlaps13ndash Accountability
(under discussion)13
13
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
ICG
Steps towards a single proposal3 Proposal finalization13ndash Public comment13ndash ICG review13ndash Changes in communities if necessary13ndash Submission13
14
ICG
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
IANA Transition IETFICANN-51
Jari Arkko IETF Chair amp Ericsson Research Russ Housley IAB Chair amp Vigilsec
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
Numbersbull ldquoMake the Internet work betterrdquo
bull A standards organisation that works on core Internet technology mdash TCPIP HTTP VoIP hellip
bull Openness mdash anyone can participate much of the work is done over the net
bull Decisions based on community rough consensus
bull Participants are individuals not organisations
IETF
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
3
IETF and IANA Roles
IETF community(policy)
IAB(oversight)
IANA(implementation)
ProtocolParameters
bull Our standards require a registry of port numbers and other similar values
bull Policy decisions for these allocations are at the IETF
bull IANA arrangements have evolved over time
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
4
IAB
IETF IANA
Nomcom
Contract
Oversight
How Do IETF and IANA Work Together
bull Agreements specify roles
bull Problems within IETF are subject to our usual processes
bull Problems between IETF and IANA are subject to contract processes
bull Oversight provided by the IABbull Model has worked well for 15+ years yearly improvements are
made when needsissues arise and there is no USG involvement
Oversight
Agreement
Nomcom
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
5
IANA Transition for the Protocol Parameters
bull Transition planning takes place at the IANAPLAN working group mdash a draft plan is under discussion
bull IETF community is very clear that transition needs to stay within current operational model
bull No change to roles of organisations
bull No new organisation needed
bull Still an opportunity for improvement
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
6
Please Participatebull If you mdash anyone in this room mdash have thoughts on IETF part
of the transition please share them
bull Key issue for us is to ensure that IANA continues to be directed by community opinion
bull And keeps on running amp evolving
bull See httptoolsietforgwgianaplan
bull And httpwwwietforgtaohtml
