iadt04i5p340

  • Upload
    monir61

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 iadt04i5p340

    1/7

    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, OCTOBER 2004340 PG ISSUE : PAED ANAESTHIndian J. Anaesth. 2004; 48 (5) : 340-346

    1. D.A.,M.D., Prof.

    2. M.D.

    3. D.A.

    Department of Anaesthesiology

    Christian Medical College, Vellore,

    Tamil Nadu, India- 632004

    Correspond to :

    Dr. Rebecca Jacob

    E-mail : [email protected]

    PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF

    ANAESTHETIC DRUGS IN PAEDIATRICSDr. Rebecca Jacob1 Dr. Krishnan B. S.2 Dr. Venkatesan T.3

    Introduction

    Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of

    drugs and inhalational agents used in anaesthesia have

    been studied extensively. However, it is only recently

    that some of the flaws in the studies and the use of drugs

    have been noted.1For example, we know that all inhalational

    agents potentiate the effects of nondepolarizing muscle

    relaxants, but it must be remembered that this effect is

    both age and time dependent. Firstly, infants and youngchildren more rapidly establish maximum potentiation

    than older children do and secondly this potentiation

    reaches maximum levels only within 1-2 hours. Therefore,

    pediatric studies related to potency, onset time or

    maintenance requirement of muscle relaxant are often

    difficult to compare as the duration of inhalational

    anaesthesia may have varied considerably and is often

    not even described. Another problem in analysis which

    may arise is that monitoring of neuromuscular response

    by accelerography produces results that may vary

    from those of electro and mechanomyography in

    comparative studies.1 The extrapolation of data fromadult studies without considering the drug effects on children

    is another consideration. For example, the initial use of

    prolonged infusions of aminoacid local anaesthetics in

    the epidural space led to a number of cases of seizures

    and cardiac arrest.2 Subsequent pharmacokinetic studies

    have now helped formulate maximum safe infusion rates

    for infants and children.

    Pharmacokinetics of drugs in children3

    The dual processes of pharmacokinetics and

    pharmacodynamics of drugs administered to patients in

    general is illustrated in the figure 1.

    Absorption of drugs

    Different modes are used to administer drugs to

    children. The most common of these involve extravascular

    routes preoperatively and postoperatively ,and intravenouslyin the operation theatre or ICU.

    Oral : The efficacy of orally administered drugs

    depends on the rate and extent of absorption from the

    gastrointestinal tract (mainly the small intestine),

    physicochemical nature of the drug, nature of gastrointestinal

    juices, rate of gastrointestinal emptying and gut blood

    flow.4,5 Several of these factors are affected in the neonate.

    The gastric pH, which is 6 to 8 at birth, decreases to 1 to

    2 within 24 hours and finally reaches adult levels

    between 6 months and 3 years of age. Decreased basal

    acid output and total volume of gastric secretions is seenin the neonate. Bile acid secretion being less in the

    neonate may reduce the absorption of lipid soluble

    drugs. The rate of gastric emptying varies during the

    neonatal period, but can be markedly increased in the

    first week of life. Long chain fatty acids (as found in

    certain neonatal formulae) can delay gastric emptying,

    and this must be remembered while determining the

    fasting status of neonates appearing for surgery. Processes

    of both passive and active transport are fully mature in

    infants by approximately 4 months of age. Intestinal

    Fig. - 1

    340

  • 7/28/2019 iadt04i5p340

    2/7

    REBECCA, KRISHNAN, VENKATESAN: PHARMACOKINETICS & PHARMACODYNAMICS OF ANAESTHETIC DRUGS 341

    enzymatic changes in the neonate such as low activity

    levels of cytochrome P-450 1A1 (CYP1A1) can alter the

    bioavailability of drugs.3 Disadvantages of the oral route

    include emesis, destruction of the drug by digestiveenzymes or their metabolism prior to absorption, presence

    of food or other drugs, which cause irregularities in

    absorption and first pass hepatic effect.

    Oral transmucosal drug or nasal administration :This

    route of administration of drugs bypasses the first

    pass hepatic effect and causes a rapid onset of drug action

    eg. sublingual nitroglycerine and nasal midazolam and

    ketamine.4

    Parenteral : The rate of systemic absorption of

    drugs after IM administration is more rapid and predictable

    than after oral or rectal administration due to high densityof skeletal muscle capillaries in infants than older

    children.5 Reduced skeletal muscle blood flow and

    inefficient muscular contractions (responsible for drug

    dispersion) can theoretically reduce the rate of IM absorption

    of drugs in neonates. Drugs injected intravenously act

    almost immediately. However some drug may be lost

    because it is adsorbed to the glass or plastic infusion system.

    Its effects may be delayed if the infusion rate is slow.

    This can lead to an incorrect conclusion about the patients

    need for more or less drug.

    Premedicant drugs such as morphine, pentobarbitalor atropine do not alter the volume of gastric juice but

    glycopyrrolate does reduce the volume of gastric juice by

    a third and increases the pH of 68% gastric samples to

    above 2.5.5

    Transdermal :This method provides sustained

    therapeutic plasma drug concentrations and presently used

    drugs in this method include fentanyl, clonidine, nitroglycerine

    and EMLA.4 Enhanced percutaneous absorption of drugs in

    infancy is due to the presence of a thinner stratum corneum

    in the preterm neonate and greater extent of cutaneous

    perfusion and hydration of the epidermis throughout

    childhood.3 Neonates have a large ratio of body surface

    area to body mass. There is a potential for drug overdose

    in neonates by this route.

    Rectal :Drugs are given rectally to avoid some of

    the problems of orally administered drugs. This route should

    be avoided in immunosuppressed patients or those undergoing

    chemotherapy.5 Drugs administered in the anal canal below

    the ano-rectal or dentate line bypass the liver after

    absorption, while drugs inserted above this line by absorption

    via the superior rectal vein undergo first pass hepatic

    metabolism. Absorption of rectally administered drugs is

    thus slow and erratic and also depends on whether the drugs

    are given in the form of suppositories, rectal capsules or

    enemas. Premedicant drugs used per rectum includethiopentone, methohexital, diazepam, atropine, and

    acetaminophen.

    Intrapulmonary : This mode of administration is

    increasingly being used in infants and children eg. surfactant

    and adrenaline. Though the goal is to achieve a

    predominantly local effect systemic exposure does occur.

    Developmental changes in the architecture of the lung and

    its ventilatory capacity (eg. minute ventilation, vital capacity

    and respiratory rate) can alter patterns of drug deposition

    and hence systemic absorption after intrapulmonary

    administration of drug.3

    Irrespective of the route of administration of drug

    (intravenous or inhalational), the expected anaesthetic

    effect occurs only when the concentration of the drug at the

    receptor site reaches the target concentration to produce

    anaesthesia.

    Uptake and Distribution (of drugs other than

    inhalational agents)4, 5

    Removal of a drug from the site of administration

    and distribution to the effector site depends on cardiac

    output, tissue perfusion and blood tissue partition co-efficient

    of the drug. Age dependant changes influence the apparentvolume of distribution (Vd) of drugs. The relatively larger

    extracellular and total body water spaces in neonates and

    infants compared to adults, coupled with adipose tissue that

    has a higher ratio of water to lipid, result in lower plasma

    concentrations of these drugs.

    Fetal albumin has a lower binding affinity and

    capacity for drugs like weak acids (salicylates). Substances

    like free fatty acids, bilirubin, sulfa and maternal steroids

    can displace a drug from albumin binding sites and increase

    the free fraction of the drug in the neonate. Serum albumin

    concentrations reach adult levels by 5 months of age.However, albumin only accounts for a small fraction of

    drug binding. Another protein of significance which binds

    drugs is a1acid - glycoprotein, reduced amounts of which

    is probably responsible for a significant proportion of unbound

    drug in infants. Drugs like diazepam, propranalol and

    lignocaine are less highly bound to a1

    acid - glycoprotein

    in children than in adults.

    A reduction in the quantity of total plasma proteins

    (including albumin) in the neonate increases the free fraction

    of drug. This decreased binding of drugs to proteins, coupled

  • 7/28/2019 iadt04i5p340

    3/7

    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, OCTOBER 2004342 PG ISSUE : PAED ANAESTH

    with an incompletely developed blood brain barrier can

    lead to accumulation of drugs like barbiturates and morphine

    in the CNS of neonates.

    Metabolism

    Development of phase I and phase II enzymes :

    Phase I reactions (oxidation, reduction and hydrolysis) are

    cytochrome p-450 dependent. The activity of many

    cytochrome P-450 isoforms including CYP3A4, CYP2C,

    and CYP1A2 is markedly decreased in the first 2 months

    of life.3 The clearance of intravenously administered

    midazolam from plasma is primarily a function of hepatic

    CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 activity and the level of activity

    increases during the first 3 months of life. Most phase I

    enzymes function at adult levels by 6 months of life. It is

    seen that some phase II pathways (eg. sulfonation) are matureat birth while others (eg. glucuronidation) are not. All

    phase II enzymes mature by 1 year of age. Phase II reactions

    involve conjugation with acetate, glycine, sulfate and

    glucuronic acid. Individual isoforms of glucuronosyl

    transferase (UGT) have unique maturational profiles. Levels

    of UGT2B7 (responsible for glucuronidation of morphine)

    are markedly diminished in the first 2 months of life.

    Glucuronidation of acetaminophen (a substrate for UGT1A6)

    and salicylates is decreased in newborns. A compensatory

    pathway (glycine pathway) for metabolism of salicylates

    makes their elimination half life only slightly longer in

    neonates. Both phase I and phase II reactions can be induced

    by barbiturates. The rate of drug metabolism is also

    determined by other factors such as intrinsic rate of the

    process, hepatic blood flow etc.

    Excretion5

    The neonatal kidney receives only 5-6% of cardiac

    output compared to adults who receive 20-25% of cardiac

    output. Term neonates have a full complement of glomeruli

    while preterm neonates do not have a full number of

    glomeruli. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is

    approximately 2-4 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 in term

    neonates. This increases rapidly over the first 2 weeks of

    life and reaches adult values by 8-12 months of age. Tubular

    secretion is immature at birth and reaches adult values

    during the first year of life. Renal drug clearance is also

    affected by the renal extraction ratio and by glomerular

    pore size. A slightly acidic urine at birth (pH 6-6.5)

    decreases the elimination of weak acids. If the kidney is

    the primary route of drug elimination, the neonates

    reduced renal function can delay the drug elimination and

    clinicians must individualize therapy in an age appropriate

    fashion.

    Individual drugs

    Intravenous induction agents

    Thiopentone Thiopentone requirements for induction

    of anaesthesia reveal an inverse relation with age. A

    significantly larger volume of distribution in the infant,

    makes the ED-50 of thiopentone in infants significantly

    greater (7 mgkg-1) than that in adults (4 mgkg-1).6 This

    larger dose increases the store of drug in the body and

    prolongs the drugs half-life. In neonates due to their low

    body fat and muscle content, less thiopentone is apportioned

    to these tissues; so concentration in the CNS may remain

    high and delay awakening.

    Benzodiazepines The premature and the matureinfant at term eliminate diazepam at a slower rate than

    adults do. Differences in metabolism as described earlier

    alter the way in which neonates and infants reduce the

    plasma concentration of drugs. Neonates hydroxylate and

    N-demethylate diazepam less well than adults or children

    do which prolongs the elimination half-life of diazepam

    (7538 hours in preterm infants as compared to 183

    hours in children) and thus prolongs its effect.5

    Ketamine In infants less than 3 months of age, the

    Vd is similar to that in older infants but the elimination

    Fig. 2 :Physiological factors that affect pharmacokinetics of drugs during their

    absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion

    ABSORPTION1. Age dependent changes in structure and function of GIT, affect oral

    absorption.

    2. First pass hepatic metabolism is a problem that is avoided in oral

    transmucosal drug administration.3. Skin thickness is similar in infants and adults, but extent of perfusion and

    hydration diminishes from infancy to adulthood.

    4. Rectal absorption of drugs is erratic and first pass hepatic metabolism

    occurs in drugs administered above the ano-rectal line.

    DISTRIBUTION

    1. Age dependent changes in body composition, influence the apparentvolume of distribution of drugs.

    2. In the first 6 months of life infants have an expanded total body water

    and extracellular water, expressed as a percentage of total body weight ,

    as compared with older infants and adults.

    3. Reduced levels of fetal albumin and1 acid - glycoprotein contribute tothe increased free fraction of drug.

    METABOLISM

    1. The activity of many cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoforms and a single

    glucuronosyltransferase isoform is markedly decreased during the first 2months of life.2. The acquisition of adult activity over time is enzyme and isoform-

    specific.

    3. Compensatory pathways can help in drug metabolism.

    4. Both phase I and phase II metabolic reactions mature by 1 year of age.

    EXCRETION

    The processes of glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion

    approximate adult activity by 6-12 months of age.

  • 7/28/2019 iadt04i5p340

    4/7

    REBECCA, KRISHNAN, VENKATESAN: PHARMACOKINETICS & PHARMACODYNAMICS OF ANAESTHETIC DRUGS 343

    half-life is prolonged. Hence, clearance is reduced in the

    younger infants. Reduced metabolism and renal excretion

    in the young infant are the likely causes. The

    pharmacokinetic details of ketamine are outlined in thetable 1.7

    Table - 1 : Pharmacokinetics of ketamine : effect of age

    Age T1/2

    (min) VdSS (Lkg-1) C l (mlmin-1kg-1)

    < 3 mo 184.7 3.46 12.9

    4- 12 mo 65.1 3.03 35.0

    4 y 31.6 1.18 25.1

    Adult 107.3 0.75 20.0

    T : Elimination half life; VdSS : Volume of distribution at steady state; CL : Clearance.

    Propofol -Propofol has been used in the induction

    and maintenance of general anaesthesia in children. In a

    study done by Murat et al in 12 children aged between 1

    and 3 years given a single dose of propofol 4 mgkg-1 an

    average Vd of 9.53.7 Lkg-1 with an average total body

    clearance of 5313 mlmin-1kg-1 was reported. Younger

    children demonstrated a larger Vd with a similar rate of

    clearance.8

    Narcotics

    Morphine Studies have demonstrated that morphine

    depresses the respiratory centre of newborns more thandoes pethidine.9 When the brain uptake index (BUI) for

    morphine was determined in developing rats, it was higher

    in the younger than the older rats. Pharmacokinetic studies

    of morphine also show that infants less than 1 week of age

    demonstrate longer elimination half life compared to older

    infants.10

    Pethidine Though pethidine is more lipid soluble

    than morphine there is reduced CNS uptake and sensitivity

    to pethidine. It produces only 1/10 the respiratory depression

    and less sedation than morphine. The activity of pethidine

    may be less because the opioid receptors of the brain are

    more primitive and do not recognize structural analogues.5

    Fentanyl In the neonate, fentanyl clearance seems

    comparable to that of the older child or the adult, while in

    the premature infant fentanyl clearance is markedly

    reduced.11

    Neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBD)

    Clinically most neuromuscular blocking drugs are

    studied under anaesthesia as the children are first

    anaesthetized and then the drugs given. Infants have a much

    greater potentiation and reduction in dose requirements than

    older children (sevoflurane decreases the dose requirement

    of non depolarizing muscle relaxants by 70% if administered

    for 90 min in school age children and 40 min in infants by

    prolonging their duration of action.1

    Depolarizing muscle relaxants On a weight basis

    more succinylcholine is needed in infants than in older

    children or adults.12 Succinylcholine is rapidly distributed

    throughout the ECF because of its relatively small molecular

    size. The blood volume and ECF volume in infants are

    significantly greater than that of a child or adult on a

    weight basis. Therefore, the recommended dose is twice

    that of adults (2 mgkg-1). The rate of succinylcholine

    hydrolysis may be slower in the preterm infant than in the

    older child due to their immature liver.13

    Non depolarizing muscle relaxants (NDMR) Thereis substantial evidence to suggest that the neuromuscular

    junction in neonates is three times more sensitive to NDMRs

    than that of adults. However this sensitivity is balanced by

    an almost identical increase in the volume of distribution

    (because of large ECF) so the required dose is unaffected.

    However, because of a prolonged elimination time, doses

    of additional relaxants should be reduced and given less

    frequently.13 Children of all ages are more resistant than

    adults to pancuronium.

    Anticholinesterases Neuromuscular blockade in

    children is antagonized much faster and by much smaller

    doses of anticholinesterases as compared to adults. Bothcholinesterase and pseudocholinesterase levels are reduced

    in premature and term newborns.14 Adult levels are not

    reached until one year of age. Inspite of the reduced

    pseudocholinesterase levels, newborns are more resistant to

    succinylcholine than adults are.

    Local anaesthetic agents2

    Local anaesthetics are used in children as topical

    application or subcutaneous injection for needle procedures,

    neuraxial blockade and peripheral nerve blockade. Uptake

    into the nerves from perineural injection sites competes

    with uptake into the central circulation. Direct measurement

    of intra-neural concentration of radiolabelled anaestheticsin animal models indicate that less than 2-3% of an injected

    dose ever enters the nerve and within 30 minutes of injection

    more than 90% of an injected dose is taken up into the

    systemic circulation. This is significant as all the

    aminoamides including bupivacaine, levobupivacaine,

    lignocaine and ropivacaine show diminished clearance in

    neonates with maturation over the first 3-8 months of age.

    Limited information suggests that the aminoesters, which

    are metabolized by plasma esterases, have a very rapid

    clearance even in neonates.

  • 7/28/2019 iadt04i5p340

    5/7

    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, OCTOBER 2004344 PG ISSUE : PAED ANAESTH

    Most drugs in pediatric dosing are usually on a

    weight scaled basis. However, it has been found that

    neonates have a shorter block duration and require a much

    larger (four fold) weight scaled dose to achieve a similardermatomal levels when given a subarachnoid block or

    achieve a similar peripheral nerve block as an adult. This

    is not only due to a higher weight scaled volume of CSF

    but there may also be age related differences in

    pharmacodynamic responses, myelination, spacing of nodes

    of ranvier, tissue barrier and other factors. Another important

    factor is the dependence of minimal blocking concentration

    on the length of nerve exposed to local anaesthetic. The

    minimal blocking concentration decreases dramatically as

    the length of nerve exposed to the local anaesthetic is

    increased as shown in the figure 3a. Hence the absolute

    dose of local anaesthetic required to block a nerve shoulddepend on the length of the nerve exposed to drug and

    should be only weakly dependent on body size (figure 3b).

    Conversely if adult and infant nerves receive the same

    weight scaled dose (figure 3c), other factors being equal,

    the adult nerve will have a longer duration nerve blockade

    than the infant nerve.

    be so narrow that maximum safe infusion rates of the aminoamides are too low to provide sole analgesia for mostmajor surgery of the thorax, abdomen or pelvis. Thus, infants

    require higher weight scaled infusion rates than adults toachieve blockade but they can safely receive only a lowerweight scaled infusion rate than adults from the viewpointof toxicity. To provide adequate safe analgesia other agentssuch as opioids, clonidine or ketamine may be used in theepidural space to provide synergistic analgesia. Anotherapproach is to use single stereoisomer like ropivacaine and

    levobupivacaine to decrease the likelihood of cardiac toxicity.

    Inhalational agents5

    The use of inhalational anaesthetics in children hasbeen the mainstay of anaesthetic practice for the last 150years. The potency of an inhaled anaesthetic is determined

    by its minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). Therequirement of inhalational agents varies inversely withage. MAC is lower with preterm infants than in terminfants and increases with post conceptual age. Age relatedchanges in MAC imply that the same alveolar concentrationwill produce different levels of anaesthesia in children ofdifferent ages.13

    Factors affecting FE/F

    I,that is, the ratio between

    the end tidal anaesthetic concentration and the inspiredanaesthetic concentration, which is a measure of how rapidlygas equilibrates between lung and tissue, are inspiredanaesthetic concentration, blood gas partition coefficient

    and cardiac output.5 Paediatric considerations of these willbe discussed in detail.

    FIor inspired anaesthetic concentration The higher

    the anaesthetic concentration the more quickly FE

    movestoward F

    I.

    Changes in ventilation and FRC - The greater theminute ventilation, as in infants and children, the morerapid the rise occurs (assuming a constant cardiac output).

    The smaller the FRC the faster the FE/F

    Iincreases. The

    FRC in infants is smaller than that of adults but tidalvolume per kg body weight is the same as that of adults.The more rapid respiratory rate, though, increases the minute

    ventilation in the young.

    Right to left shunting of blood - Which is oftenpresent in neonates and infants, slows induction of anaesthesiabecause in them the blood concentration of anaestheticsrises more slowly.

    Blood/gas partition coefficients and anaestheticsolubility - The F

    E/F

    Iof an insoluble gas like sevoflurane or

    nitrous oxide rises rapidly while with a more soluble gaslike halothane it rises more slowly. In general, however,inhaled anaesthetic agents are less soluble in the blood ofpaediatric patients. For example, the blood/gas partition

    Minimumblocking

    concentration

    Fig. 3a

    Infant nerve

    Adult nerve

    Infant nerve

    Adult nerve

    Fig. 3b : Fixed dose (mg) independent of age or body size

    Fig. 3c : Weight scaled dosing (constant mgkg-1)

    The implication of the above include the fact that

    the therapeutic index of local anaesthetics in infants may

    Length of nerve

    exposed to local

    anaesthetic

  • 7/28/2019 iadt04i5p340

    6/7

    REBECCA, KRISHNAN, VENKATESAN: PHARMACOKINETICS & PHARMACODYNAMICS OF ANAESTHETIC DRUGS 345

    coefficients of halothane and isoflurane are 18% lower inneonates than in young adults (20-40%) and in children(1-7 years) are 12% less than in young adults. This difference,

    which accounts for the more rapid rise of FE/FI in neonates,is due in part to lower albumin concentration.

    During anaesthesia, the blood gas partition coefficientcan drop by approximately 10% due to haemodilution withcrystalloid and reduction in haematocrit.

    Blood tissue partition - Anaesthetic solubility inbrain, heart and liver increase by approximately 50%between the newborn period and middle age and is probablydue to a decrease in water and an increase in lipid contentwith age.

    Partial pressure of anaesthetics - Because the blood

    flow per unit tissue mass is greater in neonates the levelof anaesthetic in the tissue increases more rapidly and theinduction of anaesthesia is more rapid

    Increased cardiac output reduces the rate of rise ofalveolar concentration of anaesthetic because moreanaesthetic is removed per unit of time. The cardiac outputof neonates per kilogram is normally twice that of adults.However F

    E/F

    Irises more rapidly because much of the

    cardiac output of neonates and infants directed to the vesselrich tissues (VRG), which then get saturated sooner.

    Specifics

    The CNS - Drugs can penetrate the CNS of neonates

    more easily than that of adults either because the neonatalblood brain barrier is more permeable or because cerebralblood flow is slower and the drugs have a longer time todissociate from plasma proteins. The blood brain barrier inneonates is also more easily disrupted by hypoxia and acidosis

    than it is in adults.5

    The cardiovascular system - The incidence ofbradycardia, hypotension and cardiac arrest during inductionis higher in infants and small children than in adults. Thishas been attributed to an increased sensitivity of the CVSto potent agents.15,16

    Induction characteristics - The most commonly usedinduction agent in pediatrics is halothane and more recently,

    sevoflurane. The primary criterion to assure a rapidinduction is the wash in curve in the first minute or twoof anaesthesia.17 During the first couple of minutes of aninhalational induction, the alveolar-to-inspired concentrationratio of these potent inhaled anaesthetics reaches to about0.33. When the wash in of halothane and sevoflurane were

    compared in the first few minutes 5% inspired halothaneachieved an alveolar concentration of 1.65% or 1.65 MAC,18

    whereas 8% sevoflurane achieved a concentration of 2.64,just in excess of 1 MAC. Although both anaesthetics providefor a rapid loss of eyelash reflex (1/3 faster with 8%

    sevoflurane than 5% halothane with single breath induction19

    the depth of anaesthesia achieved with sevoflurane is lessthan that of halothane because of the reduced MAC multiple

    in sevoflurane. It is also suggested that if sevoflurane isintroduced slowly as is the practice with halothane aprotracted excitement phase is seen before an adequatedepth of anaesthesia is achieved.20 Lerman therefore suggestsbased on the above observations, an increase to an inspiredconcentration of 8% sevoflurane as quickly as possible.

    Metabolism - Inhalational agents are apparentlymetabolized by paediatric patients to a lesser degree thanadults.5 Infants can biotransform halothane but do so to alesser extent than adults. Cited as further evidence for thisis the low incidence of halothane induced hepatitis in thepaediatric age group despite repeated doses of halothane.

    5% of inhaled sevoflurane is metabolized in vivoproducing increased levels of fluoride.20 However, thelimited metabolism of sevoflurane within the kidney doesnot provide sufficient fluoride to inhibit tubular reabsorptionto any extent. This together with its rapid washoutexplains the lack of nephrotoxicity with sevofluranecompared with methoxyflurane. Other degradationcompounds have been seen in vitro, but are not ofsignificance. What is important, though, are the isolatedreports of extreme heat and flammability occurring inbreathing circuits using desiccated carbon-dioxide absorbent

    Emergence delirium is common with inhalational

    agents, more so with sevoflurane than with halothane.21Pain is a confounding factor in the study of emergencedelirium and the lack of understanding ED is the lack of

    a specific tool to assess it. A recently developed scale21

    may help clarify this.

    References

    1. Meretoja O. Update on muscle relaxants. Pediatr Anaesth

    2004; 14: 384-6.

    2. Berde C. Local anaesthetics in infants and children: an update.

    Pediatr Anaesth 2004; 14: 387-393.

    3. Kearns GL, Susan M, Abdul Rahman et al. Developmental

    Pharmacology Drug disposition, action and therapy in

    infants and children. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1157-67.

    4. Stoelting RK. Pharmacology and Physiology in anaesthetic

    practice. 3 rd edn. Lippincott Raven. Philadelphia New York

    1999: 1-35.

    5. Gregory GA. Pharmacology. In: George A Gregory. Pediatric

    Anaesthesia, Churchill Livingstone, New York 1994: 13-47.

    6. Jonmarker C, Westrin P, Larsson S, Werner O. Thiopental

    requirements for induction of anaesthesia in children.

    Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 104.

    7. Lake CL. Paediatric Cardiac Anaesthesia, East Narwalk, Conn

    1988, Appleton and Lange.

  • 7/28/2019 iadt04i5p340

    7/7

    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, OCTOBER 2004346 PG ISSUE : PAED ANAESTH

    8. Murat I, Billard V, Vernois J et al. Pharmacokinetics of

    propofol after a single dose in children aged 1-3 years with

    minor burns. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 526-32.

    9. Way WL, Costley EC, Way EL. Respiratory sensitivity of thenewborn infant to meperidine and morphine. Clinical Pharmacol

    Ther 1965; 6: 454.

    10.Lynn AM, Slattery JT. Morphine pharmacokinetics in early

    infancy. Anesthesiology 1987; 66: 136.

    11. Collins G, Koren G, Crean P et al. Fentanyl pharmacokinetics

    and haemodynamic effects in preterm infants of ligation of

    patent ductus arteriosus. Anaesth Analg. 1985; 64: 1078.

    12. Cook DR, Fischer CG. Neuromuscular blocking effects of

    succinylcholine in infants and children. Anesthesiology 1975;

    42: 662.

    13. Gormley SMC, Crean PM. Basic principles of anaesthesia for

    neonates and infants. Br J Anaesth CEPD reviews 2001; 5:

    130-133.

    14. Wood Wood. Drugs and anaesthesia. Pharmacology for

    Anaesthesiologists.2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins Baltimore,

    Maryland USA. 1990: 32-33.

    15.Friesen RH, Lichtor JL. Cardiovascular depression during

    halothane anaesthesia in infants: a study of three induction

    techniques. Anaesth Analg 1982; 61: 42.

    16.Friesen RH, Lichtor JL. Cardiovascular effects of inhalationalinduction with isoflurane in infants. Anaesth Analg 1983; 62:

    411.

    17. Yasuda N, Lockhart SH, Eger EI II et al. Comparison of

    kinetics of sevoflurane and isoflurane in humans. Anaesth

    Analg 1991; 72: 316-324.

    18. Gregory GA, Eger EI II, Munson ES. The relationship between

    age and halothane requirement in man. Anesthesiology 1969;

    30: 488-491.

    19.Agnor R, Sikich N, Lerman J. Single breath vital capacity

    rapid inhalation inductions in children: 8% sevoflurane versus

    5% halothane. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 49-54.

    20.Lerman J. Inhalational anaesthetics. Pediatr Anaesth 2004;

    14: 380-383.21. Cravero J, Surgenor S, Whalen K. Emergence agitation in

    paediatric patients after sevoflurane anaesthesia and no surgery:

    a comparison with halothane. Pediatr Anaesth 2000; 10:

    419-424.

    Attention ISA Members

    Following is the list of the ISA Life Members, whose copies of journals have returned to the

    editorial office as Undelivered consecutively forApril, June & August 2004.

    S.No ISANo NAME CITY

    1. A0709 MRS.APARAJITA RAVI SONDH NEW DELHI

    2. B0209 DR O.BABY KERALA

    3. B0243 DR ASHOK SESHMAL BORA AHMEDNAGAR(MS)

    4. B0460 DR SURESH KUMAR BHARGAVA JAIPUR

    5. B0517 DR DEVDAS B. SHETTY BOMBAY

    6. D0695 DR DHANABAGYAM G COIMBATORE

    7. E0036 DR A EKAMBARA KRISHNAN COIMBATORE

    8. G0588 DR GEETA KAMAL JABALPUR

    9. G0627 DR GAUTAM SAHA PATNA

    10. J0288 DR V. JAYARAMAN CHENNAI

    11. J0332 DR. C. JAYASHREE TRICHY (T.N)

    12. M0008 DR MARTIN ISAAC CHENNAI

    13. M0572 DR K. MURUGADOSS KUMBAKONAM

    14. M0833 DR SHAH MUKESH THAKORBHAT BARODA,

    15. N0190 NADKARNI ACHALA .S (MS) 400703

    16. N0267 MRS. VANDANA NIGAM BHEL, BHOPAL

    17. N0375 ORRE. NAGAMALLESWARA RAO WEST GODAVAKI

    18. N0377 NITYA BISARYA INDORE

    19. N0396 NYMPHIA KAUL DELHI 9

    20. N0403 MAJOR NITIN SHARMA DELHI

    21. N0472 DR. N.D.MISRA SIKAR, (RAJ)

    22. O0008 SUSMITA OOMMAN JABHALPUR

    S.No ISANo NAME CITY

    23. P0280 DR. DILIP KUMAR PAWAR NEW DELHI

    24. R0012 DR M.VENKTA RAO HYDERABAD

    25. S0938 DR VARSHA M. SHAH AHMEDABAD

    26. S0991 DR SANGITA HASMUKHLAL SHAH NAVSARI

    27. S1062 DR. NEMI KANT SHARMA JABALPUR

    28. S1296 DR AJAY KUMAR SINHA LUCKNOW

    29. S1415 MANTHA BALA TRIPURA SUNDARI JAYKAYPUR

    30. S1892 DR. SHUBHANKAR GANGULY MUMBAI

    31. S2198 DR SHIVANAND.N.V BELLARY

    32. S2241 DR SUMA SIDDAVEERE GOWDA CHENNAI

    33. S2317 DR SEEMA BHASKAR DESHMUKH AHMED NAGAR

    34. S2417 DR G. SANTHANAM COIMBATORE

    35. S2450 DR SANJEEV KUMAR VARANASI

    36. T0093 DR S.K. THOMBRE PUNE

    37. T0111 DR DINESH MAGANLAL THAKKER BOMBAY

    38. T0285 DR. SHAH TUSHAR RAMESH BHAI RAJKOT

    39. U0066 DR MRS.USHA JAIN TRIVANDRUM

    40. V0267 DR MEET VERMA PATNA

    41. V0276 DR N. VIVEKANANDAN BOMBAY

    42. V0493 DR VADLAPUDI GOVINDARAJULU CHENNAI

    43. V0571 DR VED PRAKASH KANPUR (U.P.)