IACC Sweeps 2005Discussion Template

Helen Chu, Joe Grimes, Franz Kurfess, Craig SchultzTemplate v.1:: 03/09/05

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

Framework, Process, Timelines

Framework of IACC Sweeps: Evolution of committee, understanding of complex resource constraints and college requirements encourages a refined approach this year.

Process: establish common themes and work collaboratively to reduce overlap; college-specific requirements continue to be articulated in IACC Sweeps.

Timelines: the collaborative approach or college “one-by-one” approach is key factor in preparation time and logistics for successful IACC Sweeps.

-

-

-

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

Overall Categories

Communication Resources Infrastructure Support Outside Organizations Strategic Planning & Policy-

-

-

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

Communication Mode and Format

Email, Portal Channels, Phone, Paper Recipients

Faculty, Staff, Students Specific Groups (system users, affected)

Timing upon detection (right after a problem has

been noted) upon resolution determined by urgency, impact

-

-

-

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

Resources People/Time Workstation Program

overall funding refresh cycle selection of models flexibility in usage of funds

Lab Equipment overall funding refresh cycle

Software (KeyServer model, etc.) Classrooms / Learning Spaces Innovation / Other Teaching & Learning Resources

PRS (clickers) Utilities bordering on infrastructure

-

-

-

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

Infrastructure

Facilities Classrooms / Smart Rooms

Services Access Mobility

Wireless-

-

-

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

Support Administration

Student Administration (CMS) Poly Progress, Degree Progress

Business Processes Teaching and Learning

Media Services Learning Management Systems Faculty Development

Services Desk (Require clarification of this category

from Communications?)

-

-

-

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

Collaboration with Outside Organizations

CSU UC

UCSB Joint Doctoral Program UCD Equine Program

Community Colleges High Schools I2, Cenic Vendors

-

-

-

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

-

-

-

Strategic Planning & Policy Forward-looking challenges that impact faculty,

teaching and learning Learning Management System and similar long-term

planning issues document and knowledge repository

vision, strategy for using demographics, institutional memory, transitions as

people retire ADA Information Competence Visioning (Access, Integration, Simplicity – see IACC

Web site) Access & Security Instructional Technology Spaces

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

LegendSTATUS SCORE

E = Exceeds, M = Meets Expectations (Fully

or Partially) D = Does Not Meet Expectations - = Not Applicable

PROGRESS SCORE(Same as above)

PRIORITY: 1 High Priority…5 Low Priority

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

GroupsTopic Leader Members

Communication

Pat Mc QuaidJoe Grimes

Resources

Infrastructure

Support

Outside Organizations

Strategic Issues

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

Instructions Topics will be listed in the main

text area Subtopics will also be listed in this

area Multiple subtopics are acceptable –

like last year. Status, progress & priority scores

for each topic follow the topic Overall status, Progress &

Priority scores (average of each) goes into lower left corner

-

-

-

E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority

Status

Progress

Priority

Example: Support meet casual user requirements D, M, 1

timely and accurate information D, E, 1 problems, system status

service desk/remedy encourage colleges/departments to use remedy

E, E, 4 gather feedback from users several months after

using the service -, -,2

create technology tab in portal M, E, 1 purchasing channel

TII – status update E, E, 2 good and bad experiences flexibility for faculty requirements

-

-

-