Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
. , 1 -,, ', ... .1. II - � I ! .- ..
-711,5-1?-3
I. 4, � I.,
� :i
�. _z --
I t.. A- ,z
- 54
/~~e& A 2n
fr~~~so; i*'S ' l:sd--an z s 03
r w- satf..�
* . Js_ .
: -. .ttr _. , .
*�r
SUMMARY MEETING NOTESDOE/NRC MEETING ON HYDROLOGY TESTING
RICHLAND, WASHINGTONJULY 11-15, 1983
(-N
�, �:
-- -- I ".. L;i1. A '* . -
v --�- , NV, i
. ., - - 'e, - :. ,I - . I
� :." ;I--� : � - - , --I.. -, -
I
-44i
* . a
.4
_-
`11 I :�, ,z -, �I%
:. vI .1
-Dbcket NO.~
Distribui n
> ( R e t r n to M , 6 2 S S .C
4>4** *44~~4.444
44 * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~ - 444.~~~~~`
*~44
0%
(t ~ ~ u=
2n
'� e
;Y -i, CS
-
- , - j-
e, - .
,7 ! I
. - : 1� I .
t
* 4 .* -* 4 ; 4 , I '. _.! 0 ~% , . I. *1'.
- '1-
* ... . 4444 .�W Mi&
1. .44k
.,.44 44>444 . *lt ..�-. -
.4 . . -. 44 - - . �
.4�44.
m.-- ;,V
it,- .
I IP
- , I
I I4
.1 , , :7. 11%, - . -�z
.r .i, ..
_ . �.014 1__a �-_ I
.Q� �
44J�� . .4J*
44 4 � 41<
4 ..
1'. 4*.7f�
'1 44444*
41"�
^16 8308080143 830715% PDR WASTErs I
WM-lo . PDR~Rc 77i7-~ 9-3c
SUMMARY MEETING NOTES 7/1/ ' A o DOE/NRC MEETING ON HYDROLOGY TESTING e f _
RICHLAND, WASHINGTONJULY 11-15, 1983
Aaenda: See Attachment 1
Attendees: See Attachment 2
Technical Developments:
Beginning July 11, discussions centered around Rockwell's "BWIP Plans
for Hydrologic Characterization" (Attachment 3); Rockwell's "Siting of Piezo-
meters" (Attachment 4); and a preliminary version of NRC's "Draft Site
Technical Position of Hydrogeologic Testing Strategy for the BWIP Site" (in
preparation). As a result of the discussions, modifications to the hydrologic
characterization strategy were made by Rockwell. These are summarized in
Attachment 5, which s a modification of Figure 4 in the NRC draft technical
position. General understandings on testing strategy are summarized in
Attachment 6.
On July 12, the NRC was provided with a summary of selected test results
in boreholes RRL-2, RRL-6, RRL-14, DC-16 group, D8-11 and McGee. Investigations
of the mud effect were discussed, and some photos of core in DC-16A were
examined. No attempt was made to discuss regional hydrology or the interpre-
tation of hydrochemical data, and the cumulative test results of the past
12 months were not reviewed.
On July 15, Rockwell presented current plans for revisions in geologic
logs. These appear to address the concerns raised by NRC during the technical
meeting held the week of April 11, 1983. Summary notes of the July 15 discussion
are attached (Attachment 7).
Other Developments:
Effective July 18, direct communication on technical project matters will
be established between specified Rockwell/DOE and NRC individuals.
DOE/Rockwell will put into place a system to advise NRC and other affected
parties, on a monthly basis, of new project test data and its availability.
BWIP site characterization data reports in the Rockwell engineering release
system will be placed in the public reading room and will be provided, as
requested, to NRC and other affected parties. NRC and other affected parties
will receive a monthly status report of additions to the engineering release
system dealing with site characterization activities.
- 2 -
DOE will propose a schedule for monthly meetings on various technical
matters. Tentative meetings for next month are: August 5 (Silver Spring) -
SCP contents dealing with conceptual design and reliability of the engineered
system; and week of August 30 - underground testing. Plans also will be made
for a meeting on management of licensing records. NRC will identify priori-
ties for site characterization data updates.
NRC will become a participant in the task force on regional hydrology.
NRC tabled, for DOE comment, two draft tables: "Level of Detail Matrix"
and "DOE/NRC Informal Consultation."
frL'/OSM.ElaA July 15, 1983
Robert J. Wrigh, NFJuly 15, 1983
D0._
7/15/83
NRC TECHNICAL CONTACTS
Topic
Hydrology
Geology
Geochemistry
Repository design
Waste package
Performance assessment
Quality assurance
General
Name of Contact
Telak VermaAlt. Mark Logsdon
Paul PrestholtAlt. Martha Pendleton
Philip JustusAlt. David Brooks
John GreevesAlt. Mysore Nataraja
Robert Cook
Malcolm KnappAlt. Matthew Gordon
John GreevesAlt. Jay Rhoderick
Robert WrightAlt. Paul Prestholt
FTS
427-4683427-4680
427-4597427-4629
427-4677427-4603
427-4672427-4678
427-4163
427-4058427-4133
427-4672427-4682
427-4674427-4597
SUMMARY MEETING NOTESDOE/NRC MEETING ON HYDROLOGY TESTING
RICHLAND, WASHINGTONJULY 11-15, 1983
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Attachment Subject
1 Agenda
2 Attendees
3 BWIP Plans for HydrologicCharacterization
4 Siting of Piezometers andPumping Wells
5 BWIP-NRC General Understandingon Testing Strategy
6 Modified BWIP Strategy forHydrologic Characterization
7 Summary Notes of GeologicLogging Meeting
AGENDA
NRC/DOE WORKSHOP ON HYDROLOGIC TESTINGUSDOE/ROCKWELL HANFORD OPERATIONSBASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT
Attacment 1(2 pgs.)
Date: July 11-15, 1983
Place: 1135 Jadwin Avenue, Richland, Washington
Purpose: To discuss and begin the process of resolving the DSCAcomments concerning the BWIP groundwater flow system
ObJectives: (1) To discuss alternative hydrologic testing approaches
(2) To review hydrogeologic data collected by BWIP that areimportant to test plans, e.g., DC-4/5, DC-16, RRL-2,RRL-6, RRL-14, McGee
(3) To clarify open questions on hydrochemistry concernsin the DSCA
Participants: NRC: M. Logsdon, T. Verma, R. Wright
Golder Associates: A. Brown, G. Rowe
Williams and Associates: D. Ralston, R. Williams, G. Winter
DOE: L. Olson, D. Squires, A. Lassilla
Rockwell: S. Baker, R. Bryce, J. LaRue, J. BazemoreL. Leonhart, G. Hunt
Agenda: July 11
9:30 a.m. - DOE Introduction - L. Olson
9:45 a.m. - NRC Presentation - R. Wright
10:00 a.m. - (1) DOE/Rockwell presents proposed testing plans(piezometers, cluster tests, vertical conductivity)
(2) NRC presents draft site technical position onhydrologic testing strategy
July 12
(1) Continue discussion of testing approaches
(2) Clarification of hydrochemistry concerns in the DSCA
July 13
(1) NRC caucus; DOE/Rockwell caucus
(2) NRC - DOE/Rockwell meetings to clarify or discuss questionson test data and testing strategy
July 14
(1) NRC-DOE/Rockwell meeting to discuss and to the extentpracticable prepare a draft hydrologic testing approach
(2) NRC-DOE/Rockwell wrap-ups - discussion to include; datarelease, rules for communication, major concerns, SCPschedule
July 15
Will be reserved if needed
Attachment 2
DOE/NRC Meeting on Hydrologic TestingRichland, Washington
July 11-14, 1983
OrganizationName Phone
0. L. Olson
D. J. Squires
J. H. LaRue
R. A. Deju
R. J. Wright
J. W. Rowe
Roy E. Williams
Gerry Winter
Teek R. Verma
Adrian Brown
Steve Baker
Marc Saidman
William Ives
Charlie Cole
D. L. Graham
David Myers
Pat Domenico
Art Lassila
W. F. Heine
H. A. Haerer
Vivien Lee
M. J. Graham
R. W. Bryce
W. H. Price
G. S. Hunt
Jay L. Smith
Roger J. Henning
L. L. Mink
L. S. Leonhart
Harry Tanaka
Don Provost
DOE-RL-BWIPO Project Manager
DOE-RL-BWIPO
Licensing-Rockwell
Director - Rockwell BWIP
NRC
Golder - NRC
NRC Consultant
NRC Consultant
NRC
NRC/Golder Consultant
BWIP-Rockwell
Weston
Weston NWTS HQ Support
PNL
BWIP-Rockwell
PNL
DOE Consultant
DOE-RL-BWIPO
Rockwell
Rockwell
Rockwell Consultant
Rockwell
Rockwell-BWIP
Rockwell-BWIP
Rockwell-BWIP
DOE-RL Overview Committee
Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc.
Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc.
Rockwell-BWIPState of Washington
State of Washington
444-7334 FTS
444-7240 FTS
444-8506 FTS
444-6806 FTS
427-4674 FTS
206-827-0777
208-885-6259
208-883-0153
427-4683 FTS
303-973-9587
444-7981 FTS
301-963-6838
301-963-6844
509-376-8451
444-6258 FTS
509-376-9680
409-775-4863
444-6158 FTS
444-7114 FTS
444-7005 FTS
444-7005 FTS
444-7005 FTS
444-4605 FTS
373-4521
444-6786 FTS
213-595-5795
208-345-5000
208-345-5000
444-2655 FTS206-459-6023
206-459-6023
7/14/83
( (
BWIP PLANS FOR
HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION
. oFDC,
( ( (C l
OBJECTIVES OF THIS PRESENTATION
O SHOW HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION IN THE CONTEXT OF OVERALL
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
O FOCUS UPON ESTABLISHING A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH FOR
HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION
-
WASTEINVENTORY
WASTEPACKAGE
SUBSYSTEM
I
SITESUBSYSTEM
I
IV
REPOSITORYSEALS
SUBSYSTEM
- 1I.
SYSTEMPERFORMANCE
( ~~~~~~~~~~~~((
PLANNING STATUS
O APPROACH AND SCHEDULE BEING FORMULATED
o LONG RANGE PLANS (THREE YEARS)
O SEQUENCING OF CRITICAL ACTIVITIES
O IMPLEMENTATION OF PLANS DOES NOT DEPEND UPON A SPECIFICCONCEPTUAL MODEL
O CONTINGENCY AND FLEXIBILITY IS BEING "BUILT-INn
0 INPUT FROM SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY IS DESIRED
( (
1DWIP SITE
LONG TERM RADIONUCLIDE
ISOLATION POTENTIAL
_ l
1.1SITE STABILITY
(PROBABILISTIC AALYSIS)I-
I I - - -1.1.1 -1.1.2 1.1.3 -
GEOLOGIC HYDROLOGIC SCENARIO
STABILITY STABILITY DEVELOPMENT
1.2SITE RADIONUCLIDEISOLATION POTENTIAL
- '- I -
1.2.1GROUNDWATERFLOW SYSTEM
1.12.2RADIONUCLIDE
TRANSPORTPROPERTIES
( ( (
( (
( ( (
. .1.2.1.1.2 1 2.1.1.3 1.2.1.1.4IGEOttETRiCI HYDRAULIC POTENTIOMETRIC HYDROCHEMISTRY
tCOTCEPTTPROPERTIES| PROFILES
1.2.i.3.1STRATIGRAPHY
I I I , _1.2.1.3.2 1.2.1.3.3 1.2.1.3.4
STRUCTURES GEOMORPHOLOGY REPOSITORYDESIGN
1.2.. 2.6EOCIIEMICALI_ MODEL J
. .
1.2.1.2.1SOLIDS
CHARACTERIZATION
F i 1R 1.2.1.2.2E
GROUNDWATERCHEMISTRY
( ( (
1.2.2RADIONUCLIDE
TRANSPORTPROPERTIES
1.2.2.1THEORETICAL
RADIONUCLIDETRANSPORT
1.2.2.2NATURAL
RADIONUCLIDETRANSPORT
1.2.2.3INDUCED
RADIONUCLIDETRANSPORT
-F ~ ~ ~ ~
L FIELD TESTINGFOR CONFIRMATION
LABORATORY TESTING
- THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSES
(
CONTROLLING PLANS
(
SITE CHARACTERIZATIONPLAN CHAPTER 13
(HYDROLOGY)
DRILL AND TESTPLAN
GROUNDWATERMONITORINGPLAN
COVERS THE ACQUISITION
OF TIME VARIANT
HYDRAULIC DATA
HYDROCHEMISTRY 'PLAN I
-COVERS THE ACQUISITION
OF HYDROCHEMICAL
DATA/ANALYSIS
COVERS THE ACQUISITION
OF NON-TIME VARIANT
HYDRAULIC DATA
MAJOR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED FOR
HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION
O PIEZOMETER BASELINE (DC-19, 20, 22, RRL 14, RRL-2)
- VALIDITY OF HEAD DATA
- MODEL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
- SUPPORT PRE-EMPLACEMENT TRAVEL TIME DETERMINATION- INSTALL MULTI-PORT SYSTEMS IN RRL-14 AND RRL-2
O LARGE SCALE MULTIPLE WELL AQUIFER TESTING (DC-16, 19, 20, 22)
- REPRESENTATIVENESS OF DATA (INCLUDES VALIDITY OF TESTING)
- EVALUATE HYDROLOGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF STRUCTURES
- VERTICAL CONDUCTIVITY
O SMALL SCALE HYDRAULIC TESTING (SINGLE AND MULTIPLE WELL)
- HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES
- HYDROCHEMICAL DATA (DC-18)
- SPECIAL TESTING (MUD EFFECTS, DYNAMIC LOGGING)
o GROUNDWATER MONITORING
o GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSES
- HYDROCHEMICAL SAMPLING
- SOLIDS CHARACTERIZATION
- GEOCHEMICAL MODELING
- FIELD TESTING (TRACER TESTS)
- ISOTOPIC ANALYSES
( ( ()
Not.4 PsI ' .^S;It$ )JL7O; t %, AS' 7 ' u-
0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Iy\ DC-22 I~~~~~~~~~~~DC2 36 23 1 *
0 RRL.143 * DH5 DH4233 I _ __ _ I
PIS~~~~~~
1DC- IN~~~~~~~~~~~~~.,-
/RRL45 V~SRLL~dE~I ~
\DH2O
E. --------- -RE C--RRLI tn ORR9w74 t X tA 0 1% ... II --
1 OH 2ILE D2 01 % I",22 ~ w" tooDC1 I 2________________ J3r. I S 1 2lg_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _
b~~~~~IO EES '~' DB I 3 .l' 3{ .
I 9 0', .0 12 1 9 b0fl
Existing and Planned Boreholes In and Around the Reference Repository Location.A = new cluster wells
Note: RRL-14 and RRL-2 to be equipped with multi-port piezometer
( ( (
PIEZOETRIC BASELINE
o THREE MULTIPLE LEVEL PIEZOMETRIC STATIONS AROUND THE REPOSITORY SITE
o T EXISTING WELLS EQUIPPED WITH MULTIPORT SYSTEMS
o PREREQUISITE FOR LARGE SCALE HYDRAULIC TESTING AT THE RRL
( ( (
Ak
InstallPiezometers
K. good correlation IN.
C.I"
InitiateLarge ScaleAquifer Testing
-
certain
Establish Equillibration,Seasonal variation andTrends, independentlyof drill & test data
PIEZOMETRIC BASELINE
VALIDITY OF HEAD DATA
O ESTABLISH CORRELATION BETWEEN RRL-14 (WITH MULTI-PORT SYSTEM)POINT HEAD DATA AND DC-22 PIEZOMETER DATA
O ESTABLISH CORRELATION BETWEEN RRL-2 (WITH MULTI-PORT SYSTEM)
POINT HEAD DATA AND INTERPOLATED PIEZOMETER DATA
O ESTABLISH CORRELATION BETWEEN DC-16A POINT HEAD DATA ANDEXTRAPOLATED PIEZOMETER DATA
O EXTENT OF CORRELATION WILL BE USED TO ESTIMATE
- UNCERTAINTY OF DRILL AND TEST HEAD DATA
- EQUILIBRATION STATE OF PIEZOMETERS
- CYCLICAL VARIATION
- TRENDS
( ( ( 1
PIEZOffTRIC BASELINE
MODEL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
O LARGE SCALE MODELING MINIMIZES IMPACT
OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON COLD CREEK SYNCLINE
O HIGH RESOLUTION HEAD PROFILE NEAR RRL
WILL BE USED TO CALIBRATE LARGE
SCALE MODELS
O CALIBRATED LARGE SCALE MODEL WILL BE
USED TO PROVIDE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
FOR SMALLER SCALE MODELS
( (
PIEZOMETRIC BASELINE
SUPPORT PRE-EMPLACEMENT TRAVELTIME DETERMINATION
O VELOCITY - K 6Hfi
O HEAD PROFILE NEEDED TO DETERMINE
PRE-EMPLACEMENT GRADIENT
( I,
( C (~~~~~~~~~~~~
LARGE SCALE MJLTIPLE WELL
AQUIFER TESTS
o flULITPLE LAYER TESTS
o PUMP MIDDLE LAYER
0 OBSERVE ALL THREE LAYERS AT THREE OR MORE LOCATIONS
O HYDROLOGIC PROPERTIES DETERMINED FROM PRE-TEST AND POST-TEST
PARAMETRIC NUMERICAL ANALYSES
O COMPLEMENTS SMALL SCALE TESTS
( ( (
LARGE SCALE MULTIPLE WELL AQUIFER TESTS
REPRESENTATIVENESS OF DATA
O TRANSMISSIVITY DETERMINED USING MULTIPLE WELL TECHNIQUES
O CORRELATIONS ESTABLISHED BETWEEN DIFFERENT TESTS, BOTH LARGE
AND SMALL SCALE
O ANALYSES WILL BE CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE VALUES TO
BE USED IN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT MODELS
( ( ( )
L GE SCALE MULTIPLE WELL AQUIFER TESTS
HYDROLOGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF STRUCTURES
O INTERPRETED GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOLOGIC
PARAMETRIC PRE-TEST PREDICTIONS
O HYDRAULIC BOUNDARIES MAY BE INFERRED
TESTING
DATA USED TO SUPPORT
FROM MULTIPLE WELL
o THREE DIMENSIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF BOUNDARIES WILL BE INVESTIGATED
( ( ~~~~~~~~~~~~(
LARGE SCALE MULTIPLE WELL AQUIFER TESTS
VERTICAL CONDUCTIVITY
O DRAWDOWN ABOVE AND/OR BELOW THE PUMPED LAYER INDICATES VERTICAL
LEAKAGE
O DISCRETE AND DISTRIBUTED LEAKAGE WILL BE MODELED
O GEOMETRY AND QUANTIFICATION OF LEAKAGE MAY BE DETERMINED BY
MATCHING DRAWDOWN TO PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
)
( ~~~~~~~~~~((
MUD EFFECTS
O LARGE SCALE TESTS
- AIR ROTARY HOLES
- RESULTS COMPARED TO THOSE FROM MUD DRILLED HOLES
O HYDRAULIC EFFECTS
- DB-2 TESTS
O HYDROCHEMICAL EFFECTS
- DC-14 TEST
SITING OF PIEZOMETERS
( ( (I0
JUSTIFICATION
1. TECHNICAL CONCERNS
O TIME-VARIANCE
O 4-DIMENSIONAL PHENOMENA
O MODEL CALIBRATION
O DATA VALIDATION
2. PRACTICAL CONCERNS
O EXISTING FACILITIES WITHOUT MODIFICATION
CANNOT FULFILL HYDROLOGIC CHARACT-
ERIZATION NEEDS (E.G., NUMBER OF
HORIZONS, SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION,
INTEGRITY, ETC.)
O SCHEDULING OF TESTING AT EXISTING
FACILITIES
MINIMUM NUMBER OF SITES REQUIRED AT THIS TIME
CONSIDERATIONS
1. A MINIMUM OF THREE SITES ARE REQUIRED TO DETERMINE HYDRAULIC GRADIENTS IF
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE IS PLANAR
2. MORE THAN THREE SITES ARE PROBABLY UNWARRANTED AT THIS TIME BASED ON:
o UNCERTAINTIES
o THE POTENTIAL FOR USING TESTING DATA FROM OTHER BOREHOLES
TO SUPPLEMENT PIEZOMETER DATA AND REFINE POTENTIOMETRIC
SURFACES
RECOMMENDATION
INSTALL A MINIMUM OF THREE NEW, DEDICATED PIEZOMETER SITES AT STRATEGIC
LOCATIONS ACROSS THE RRL.
SELECTION OF HORIZONS FOR MONITORING
CONSIDERATIONS
1. > 80 FLOW/INTERBEDS IN SECTION
2. HYDRAULIC HEAD AND HYDROCHEMICAL BREAKS
3. MODELING DATA NEEDS
4. TRANSMISSIVITY AND PRODUCTION
5. RELATIONSHIP TO CANDIDATE HORIZON
6. IDENTIFIABLE FROM GEOPHYSICAL LOGS
RECOMMENDATION
NINE HORIZONS
o TOB
o RATTLESNAKE RIDGE INTERBED
o MABTON INTERBED
o PRIEST RAPIDS 2 FLOW TOP
o ROZA/UPPER FRENCHMAN SPRINGS FLOW TOP(S)
o LOWER FRENCHMAN SPRINGS FLOW TOP(S)
o GRANDE RONDE #3 FLOW TOP
o COHASSETT FLOW TOP
o UMTANUM FLOW TOP
DATA FROM THESE NINE HORIZONS WILL BE USED IN MATHEMATICAL MODELING
SELECTION OF STRATIGRAPHIC HORIZONS
FORMATIONSTRATIGRAPHIC
UNIT RATIONALE
SADDLE
MOUNTAINS1. TOP OF BASALT O MODEL BOUNDARY
O MOST DYNAMIC
O ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE
2. RATTLESNAKE RIDGE-
INTERBED
3. MABTON INTERBED
O UPPER SADDLE MOUNTAINS
O OTHER DATA AVAILABLE
O ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE
O HYDRAULIC & HYROCHEM-
ICAL "BREAKS"
O DATA AVAILABLE
THROUGHOUT BASIN
O LOWER SADDLE MOUNTAINS
WANAPUM 1. PRIEST RAPIDS O HIGH PRODUCER
O UPPER WANAPUM
O HYDRAULIC & HYDRO-
CHEMICAL "BREAKS"
2. ROZA/U. FRENCHMAN
SPRINGS
3. LOWER FRENCHMAN
SPRINGS
O AQUIFER PRODUCTIVITY
O POSSIBLE TRANSITION
O ISOLATION OF GRANDE
RONDE
O HYDRAULIC AND HYDRO-
CHEMICAL "BREAKS"
GRANDE RONDE 1. U. GRANDE RONDE
2. COHASSETT
3. UMTANUM
O ISOLATION ABOVE COHASSETT
O HYDRAULIC & HYDRO-
CHEMICAL "BREAKS"
O GRADIENT ACROSS CANDIDATEHORIZON
O CANDIDATE HORIZON
O CANDIDATE HORIZON
O GRADIENT ACROSS CANDIDATEHORIZON
( (l( i
SITE SELECTION
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. CONFIGURATION OF POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE
o PROBABLE FLOW DIRECTIONS
o HYDRAULIC GRADIENTS
o GEOPHYSICAL ANOMALIES
2. PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
o LOCATION AND COMPLETION CHARACTERISTICS OF EXISTING BOREHOLES
o RELATIONSHIP TO ES
o INTEGRITY OF ROCK
o EXCLUSION AREA
o SHALLOW CONTAMINANT PLUMES
o MEASUREMENT SENSITIVITY
o OTHER TESTING LOCATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS:
LOCATIONS FOR DC-19, 20 AND 22
( (.~~~~~~~~
ABLE -v~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~u31 ilV, BUTTE
Kil
1 -,MONTAIK!N CULIN ..,. L MOUNTAIN
t WESTER" OAS..11- 9'moiU"TAIN~~~-.,- , •; ANTC
50~~~~~~~~A~
Top~Of-Basa~t Structure Map. Cold CreekASynANTne
FIGURE 3.
PC-2I C
0
Dc- 9
) ) ) 'I
( ~~~~~~(
METHOD OF PIEZOMETER COMPLETION
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. AVAILABLE DESIGNS
A. DIAMETER CONSTRAINT
o CLUSTER OF STANDPIPES
o MULTIPLE-PORTED PIEZOMETER (e.g., WESTBAY)
o MULTIPLE PACKERS (e.g., BASKI)
B. NO CONSTRAINT
o NESTS OF STANDPIPES (e.g., DC-1)
o COMBINATION
2. DRILLING
o SUBCONTRACTED
o IN-HOUSE
RECOMMENDATIONS:
USE A COMBINATION OF SYSTEMS AT EACH SITE
PROPOSAL
O THREE DEDICATED PIEZOMETER SITES (DC-19, DC-20, DC-22)
O INSTRUMENTATION OF RRL-2 AND RRL-14
O CONTINUOUS MONITORING WITHIN 9 HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC UNITS ACROSS THE RRL
0 USE OF NESTED AND SINGLE STANDPIPE PIEZOMETERS AT EACH SITE
(
to 0 Ant1 )P C @.* nu woo * 1 .. _ lP., M 606.0~~~~~~~~Gh4 1111 L P 0 A ~J Wei
I T l, "t2~ -'' 4RRL t' 1 35~ DC-2 36 3 201 1 X v RRL4 e. No17 - ss - - v -- t. X.i tRRL.¶4'I 2 11RL S I I 1
.b~ t'~~- DR-22is a
a ! 2 / t ~I | D H D 1 14 LCePF,
- I~~~~~~~~~~~D -
I R t t: , e~dRL- i---^-
I @E VE 'RL -9 ] fi' E | 0' xI
R RL- . | ( < ^15~,,. |DC19.O 1 2 MILES |22w E I 2 t DH-21 I i ts .
I IOU v"*~~~~fr I~
O 1 2 KILOMETERS .. "' b ON- Woo
Existilng and Planned Boreholes In and Around the Reference Repository Location.
( (
// ~~~~~~~N
-C eC20/
ES
DC.19 CONFIGURATION DC.20 CONFIGURATION
C
OAiX IRRL.14
DC-22 CONFIGURATION
Plan View Illustrating the Relationships of Boreholes at Each Cluster Site.
( ~~~~~~~~((
"A" " "C"
U.MI u " 2 16 0DTOB Ml : c _ PIEZOMETER
RRI TUBES
CEMENT 1i CEMENT '0 CEMNT
'>1~~~~~~~~~~~~~7 20001
PERFORATED I
ŽPRIPERFORATE
TO MI
(NOT TO SCALE)INTERVAL ISOLATIONDETAILS NOT SHOWN
HR - HANFORD/RINGOLD SEDIMENTSGS - GROUND SURFACE ' PR . PRIEST RAPIDS FLOW ITOe - TOP OF BASALT RIUFS ROZA/UPPER FRENCHMAN SPRINGSRRI . RATTLESNAKE RIDGE INTERBED LFS . LOWER FRENCHMAN SPRINGSSM . SADDLE MOUNTAINS BASALT 12114 RC . ROCKY COULEE FLOWMl . MABTONINTERBED C . COHASSETT FLOW TOPw WANAPUM BASALT -3,800'TD U - UMTANUM FLOW TOP.
Section View of Boreholes at Each Cluster Site Illustrating Completion Design and Horiions to be Monitored.
( (
GENERALIZED DEPTHSTRATIGRAPHY f (m)
20 - 8 In. I.D CAIN
HANFORD ANDiRINGOLOFORMATIONS.
.- 6 in. I.D. CASING
o .
..------ 4 In .D. CASING T
_ TOP OF BASALT-fi0(182.9)- . .
SADDLEMOUNTAINS 3.937 in. OPEN HOLEBASALT
RATTLESNAKE RIDGE INTERREDTOTAL DEPTH 800(259.1) _
2K8306-3.23
Section View of DC-19A, DC-20A, andFormation and Installing of
DC-22A Prior to Perforating the RingoldPiezometer Tube.
( ( C
GENERALIZED DEPTHSTRATIGRAPHY h (m)
20 In. I.D. CASINGHANFORD AND 401RINGOLDFORMATIONS
TOP OF BASALT
SADDLEMOUNTAINSBASALT
13.375 In. O.D. CASING
MABTON INTERRED
1,600 487.7)- _
WANAPUMBASALT
VANTAGE INTERBED
12.25 In 130.5 cm)HOLE
GRANDE TOTAL DEPTHRONDE 3.900(1.188.7)--_BASALT
NOT TO SCALE
2K8306.3.2 1
Section View of DC-19C, DC-20C and.DC-22C Prior to Perforating theMabton Interbed and Installation of Six Piezometers.
( C
SUMMARY
O THREE NEW CLUSTER WELL SITES
O NINE HORIZONS MONITORED AT EACH SITE
O MULTIPORT SYSTEMS INSTALLED AT RRL-2 AND RRL-14
O SITING BASED UPON GEOLOGIC HYDROLOGIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS
(I(
SITING OF PPING WELLS
SITING OF PUMPING WELLS
O POSITION RELATIVE TO JLTILEVEL OBSERVATION POINTS
O POSITION RELATIVE TO ES
O POSITION RELATIVE TO OTHER POTENTIAL OBSERVATION SITES
O LOCATION OF POSSIBLE STRUCTURES OR ANOMWLIES
O PREDICTED RADII OF INFWENCE
O OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
I( ( ( I
GENERALZED DEPTHSTRATIGRAPHY . ft PROPOSED
20 In. I.D. CASING
HANFORDAND 40112.2)-RINGOLDFORMATIONS
13.375 In. 0.0. CASINGTOP OF BASALT
SADDLEMOUNTAINSBASALT
MABTON INTERBED
1.700(518.2) -
WANAPUM TOTAL DEPTH 12.25 In 130.5 cm) HOLEBASALT 1,7501533.4)
Section Vew of DC-19B, DC-20B, and DC-22B Production Wells as 2K306.3.22Completed n the Wanapum Basalt.
I*
1.
K) * I
C. ( (I
AFTER 28800 mn a - 50 gpmT - 50 t2/dayS - .00001
DC- 169
DC-Soc0
4)m
4-
z0
p
3C)
¢
45
90
135
180
2 2 5 1 I I g s | @ | | * | h I * * I I a I P I I I II J11000 0000 6600 4400 2200 0 2200 4400 6600 8800 1 1000
r - DISTANCE FROM WELL (feet)
7
Attachment 5(6 pgs.)
BWIP-NRC General Understanding onTesting Strategy
July 14, 1983
BWIP-NRC General Understanding onTesting Strategy
July 14, 1983
1.0 GENERAL
1.1 Additional data are required for hydrologic characterization of the
Reference Repository Location (RRL).
(a) Continuous head measurements are required.
(b) Large-scale hydraulic testing is necessary.
(c) Small-scale testing should be continued at the designated
wells.
(d) Short-duration, low stress interference tests should be
continued.
(e) The completion of a pumping well near RRL-2 will provide
important information.
1.2 Periodic consultation between DOE and NRC should be continued prior
to decision points in the program. These discussions will be held
sufficiently early so that any changes that NRC comments may entail
can be duly considered by DOE in a manner not to delay DOE activities.
1.3 Hydrochemistry is principally used to confirm groundwater flow systems
as determined from hydraulic data.
2.0 INSTALLATIONS
2.1 The proposed large-scale aquifer test facilities are appropriate in
number and location.
2.2 The selection of the 9 designated units to be monitored appears
appropriate.
2.3 Installation of a pumping well (RRL-2B) near RRL-2 will provide
useful information.
2.4 Multiport equipment for specific applications in cored holes should
be qualified.
2.5 Cement off only those zones in the Grande Ronde that are necessary for
well construction, allowing for maximum potential for future testing.
3.0 HEAD MEASUREMENT
3.1 Plans (as presented) for installing piezometers are appropriate and
should be implemented as soon as possible. Specifically, the number,
location and air mist drilling methods for the piezometers including
use of drilling mud through the Mabton, are appropriate.
3.2 The use of multiple-completion standpipe piezometers for long-term
head measurements is appropriate.
3.3 The viewgraph entitled "Validity of Head Data" outlines three approches
to correlation of new head data and existing head data. Two of these
use data from RRL-2 and DC-16A and involve correlations with inter-
polated and extrapolated new head data. It is unlikely that these
two approaches will be highly convincing in validating the existing
head data. Continuing thought should be given to other possible
means for qualifying the existing head data.
4.0 LARGE SCALE TESTS
4.1 The initial large-scale test should be performed after initial piezo-
metric data are obtained such that pre-emplacement conditions can be
reasonably well-defined.
4.2 The Grande Ronde formation is the primary target for large-scale
hydraulic property testing, but the major aquifers in the Wanapum
should also be tested.
4.3 The burden of proving the hydraulic continuity of rock units across
the RRL cannot be put on hydraulic testing if hydraulic parameters
do not allow long distance response (say, 1-3 km). If large scale
tests do not work, local-scale tests may be necessary to characterize
hydrologic conditions.
4.4 The large scale pump tests may provide opportunities to quality exist-
ing horizontal conductivity values. Values from interference tests
should be compared with values from earlier single-hole tests.
4.5 The approach to testing presented for the DC-16 borehole cluster test
specification seems appropriate.
4.6 The tests proposed under "Large Scale Multiple Well Aquifer Testing"
in viewgraph "Major Activities Required for Hydrologic Characterization"
may not provide adequate information about the groundwater system near
the repository. An understanding of this part of the system is needed
to predict pre-emplacement groundwater travel time, as required by
10 CFR 60. The proposed pump test at RRL-2B, and related tests in the
RRL, will address this matter.
5.0 MUD EFFECTS
5.1 In investigating possible effects of drilling mud on hydraulic
properties, attention should be given not only to high and low per-
meability units but also to intermediate permeability units - say,
10-6 to 10-8 /s.
5.2 The DB-2 test specification should be modified to better simulate
drilling conditions.
5.3 Mud loss in boreholes will be reported as cumulative gallons with
depth.
( 6.0 TRACER TESTSK>
6.1 The two hole tracer tests should be conducted in wells near the
RRL. They should include, at a minimum, determination of effective
porosity and longitudinal dispersivity.
Attachment 6(8 pgs.)
MODIFIED BWIP STRATEGYFOR HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION
(
HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION PLAN ELEMENTS
(.
Objectives
collectadditionaldata requiredfor hydrologiccharacterizationof the RRL whileaddressingconcerns raised
RequiredActivities
piezometricbaseline
large scalehydraulictesting
continuesmall scaletesting
Data Needs
o head data validation
o establish modelboundary conditions
o determine pre-emplacement traveltimes
o representativeness ofdata (repositoryscale
Facilities
piezometricnetwork
DC-19; DC-20;DC-22; RRL-14;RRL-2A;699-57-83
miscellaneousobservationpoints
DB-11; DB-12;DB-14; D-16;DC-4/5; RRL-6;
large scalepumping network
RRL-2B; DC-16;DC-20; DC-22;
small scalee-isng
DC-18; McGee;DC-16; DC-4/5;DC-7/8
o flow systemevaluation (4-D)
(
LOGIC DIAGRAM FOR BWIP BOREHOLE: HYDROLOGIC TEST STRATEGY (D
( i
STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE 3 STAGE 4
(O) NOTE: THIS DIAGRAM It CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE ANDWILL REQUIRE REVIEW, AND POSSIBLE MOOIFICATIONON THE BASIS OF NEW TEST RESULTS -0@ MP HOLES ARE STARTER HOLESMULTIPORT COMPLETION IN GRANDE RONDE
NRC CONSULTATION AND REVIEW) RUm IN PARALLEL THrOUGOUT TE PRmRAm
iS EXPECTED TO BE A 2 YEAR PROGRAMTESTS TO BE PERFORMED IN THE GRANDE RONDEAND POSSIBLY ALSO IN WANAPUM
C ("C"E
0cMo I-V
PRIEST RAPIDS FLOW IROZA/UPPER FRENCHMAN SPRINGSLOWER FRENCHMAN SPRINGSROCKY COULEE FLOWCOHASSET FLOW TOPUMTANUM FLOW TOP
FIGURE 5. Section View of Boreholes at Each Cluster Site Illustrating Completion Design and Horizons to be Monitored.
IMTANUMRIDGE GABLE QUiTE
: GEE N
2 * R4ALS>
DO-~g~I DC-416 -b
~~KIMA
2' DC 19 0
11MMIA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ACTIVE AND PLANNED WELL LOCATIONS
( C (
I
I tI.
ID511
* I
I1l l l l
_ _.
l
l22 I
I
.-IT - -
III
I
- - - I.,
II
aII
I I
I
il.to
II
_ _
O as IM WI I
o : s I mKNomtff
LEGEND
A CLUSTER WELLS"
* SMALL SCALE TEST WELLS
__ . .II II I I- I I-- I - - - - - -III
I I I ~~I I I I22 I 2 2 I 24 1 I I 20 21 1 1 ~Dfl-14' DC-19A.CII I 1 I A III
-, I,
ACTIVE AND PLANNED WELL LOCATIONS
C C C.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0
tO1CONFIGURATION DC20 CONFIGURATION
. oC
20/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-/ A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C
I
TRnL 14
N
*1I
DC-22 CONFIGURATION
FIGUR 2. Plan View Illustrating the Relationships of Boreholes at Each Cluster Site.
FIGURE 9 DRILLING SCHEDULE FOR DC-19, DC-20, DC-22
FY 1983 FY 1984DESCRIPTION JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
1O| 17 24 31 7 | 14 1 28 4 111825 29161 3 6 13 20 27 4 1 1825EE APPROVAL SITE PREPARATION CORE TO 850' WORKOVER RIG
DC-19 A ST CABLE TOOL TO TOP OF BASALT
PREPARATION ROTARY TO PRIFST RAPIDSB
ENTRY HOLE WOOEM 0 S ' ~~~~~~~~~WORKOVER c , , 7 ROTARYTO GRANDE RONDE RIG 7
SITE PREPARATION ENTRY , .HOLE . WORK-
SITE PREPARATION CETOOF ATO RET I'RRG
DC-20 A 1 _s = BASALTSITE ENTRY HOLE ROTARY TO
PREPARATION PRIEST RAPIDS
SITE PREPARATO ROTARYC A I TOGRANDE RONDE WORKOVER RIG C/
ENTRY HOLE ,SITE PREPARATION CABLE TOOL TO WORKOVER RIG
SAPREPARATIONLT ORET 8DC-22 A I 7__ ------ _ __ __
SITE ENTRY HOLEPREPARATIONI
SITE PREPARATION T ROTARY TO PRIEST RAPIDSC LV-7 ROTARYTOGRANDERONDE WORKOVER RIG 7
ENTRY HOLE
JA830707-2CABLE TOOL RIG NO. 1
CABLE TOOL RIG NO. 2 _
RHO LONGYEAR 44 RIG _
ROTARY DRILL RIG NO. 1
WORKOVER RIG NO. 1
WORKOVER RIG NO. 2
CABLE TOOL RIG NO. 3 RTYDILG_-ROTARY DRILL RIG NO. 2
ATTACHMENT 7(7 ps.)
BOREHOLE LOGGING MEETING
SUMMARY MEETING NOTES
1. Specific concerns as identified in the BWIP/NRC meeting of April 11-15,
1983 (see attachment 1) are addressed by the BWIP logging approach
shown on attachments 2 and 3.
2. NRC consultant will review our proposed field log and procedure to
assure that concerns relative to fracture logging have been satisfied.
3. BWIP agrees to investigate correlating geophysical logs to rock
properties.
4. BWIP will revise procedures so that training of well site geologists
includes familiarization with characteristics of basalt and sediments
as seen in outcrop.
5. Procedures for logging core are to be revised to mark location of
stub when possible.
6. Location of core losses should continue to be recorded.
7. Shift Report of Operations as shown on attachments 4 and 5 are adequate.
Consideration will be given to requiring the driller to take additional
responsibility in preparing this report.
-
BOREHOLE LOGGING MEETING
JULY 15, 1983
Name
W. H. Price
J. H. LaRue
Teek R. Verma
Richard W. Galster
Douglas E. Hansen
D. J. Moak
A. G. Lassila
G. S. Hunt
S. M. Price
L. C. Hulstrom
R. D. Landon
R. K. Ledgerwood
Organization
Drilling & Testing Group, Rockwell
Licensing, Manager, Rockwell
NRC, Washington, D.C.
Corps of Engineers, Seattle
Lachel Hansen, Bellevue
Drilling & Testing Group, Rockwell
BWIPO/DOE
BWIP Site Department
BWIP Geosciences Group
BWIP Waste Package
BWIP Geosciences Group
BWIP Geosciences Group
( ( C
SPECIFIC CONCERNS OF NRC ONGEOLOGIC LOGGING PRACTICES
O GEOLOGIC LOGGING SCALE (1" 10') DOES NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENTDETAIL TO MEET USER NEEDS.
O WELL SITE GEOLOGIST LOGS ARE INCONSISTENT IN DESCRIBING UNITS(EX., VESICLES) (STANDARDIZATION).
O NO LOGS EXIST WHICH SUMMARIZE ALL DATA NEEDED BY DATA USERS.
O DRILLERS LOGS ARE NOT BEING PREPARED BY DRILLERS.
O FRACTURE LOGS MAY BE MISLEADING TO DATA USERS.
o -10
ah mC+n :m
rT -
k-
( C CI F
CORING DATA ROCK DESCRIPTtON
C
0
a
*1
.3
P..
I rDISCONTINUITYDESCRIPTION f
RUN
Mwsd-B.,
ROCK CORE GENERAL FABRICDw
k'
PLANES FILLING
V -4. 4 V V V - .I I r-.- Y t 4 V- 1 V --. V - - . . .
DEPTH
266.5
I 2
xI-.a2zIL
3
ul
g,I3I
U,EnCa-j
I
w
0UA4
5 a I n 9
inI
z0CI
10zzW
gI--
3:
.6
-J
0W6.
olua. I I0Op 1 I-I
VIS
13 12
Ih-
W49
CHEAT1I
zW 4)0
z0
0Z
ID
I-.za
14 115
U
I2 T
la 17z0
z
0
a
I
isz0
z00
19w
ti0z
G.
20 I I 21
uiQ.2I- 0
0
Ra3:
REMARKS
ROD.: 97%
* TIGHT
DEPTH
266.5
0
O0
Ia0
Z0
zC)
mM
M
C-0
zz
- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. . - .... - - - -- . - . - . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . -
267.5
266.5
269.5
2TO.
27.5-
272S~2 ?L5J
2715-
2T4.5-
275.5-
276.5
06
4
I.St
I
I
L
0
7 j
7
F
IP
a
I 'ia
I '
.
a
IS
a5
9d
01
85
0'
ed60'
NN
N
N
N
N
N
ssS
S
SS
a
01 N IS FC
FCFP
FC
PC
PP
PC
FFL C C
0
F
SH
SHM
CL
SH
M
SN
SW
N.
N
L
M
I
N
N
N
N
S
S
S
S
N
Fc
N
FC
SH
SH
Do
Do
IN
W
gO
DG06
N
06
M
X
t
* TIGHT
PROMDED BY DRILLING
X IRREGULAR-UPTOV2'
SAMPLE WAXED
274.1 -274.6
WAKESHA
-267.5
...268.5
-269.5
-270.5
.271.5
.272.5
.273.5
-.274.5
-2755
276.5
en
C
'iizC)
N MI00
a-a 0
T 0
400
0 0C)
In 00m
2
En 1
U
N C,' 4 l5N
N
S N
P
N
514
*
- I B° ' S MAYVLLE
0.
G d. . ,- * * - \ _ _ _ _
l l
l
s we-WCA IIP-i.. -
.0 IN ~IS)
I WD4CAtI AS FOLOWOx$ =
LOSS 11* vexcA? IImiWWNV*UI S
OF COVI AC00104POF0 C4 Al COEVIOCOMM0. OM1
71NOICAll U? M.OC t:AIGOOF C(V PICES
THOSI OJI IC
IC* tOCAt*Nr co" PIECES
.4*4D411
£90JP 10J'As
OW Urn OF AL&
AM A$I~0A040 P0±0.41
CM 0cr"It
go $IAt IMSIOPS
Ss SANDSTOEC CGLOUIRATI
IIAY M0OSPY o?I Sor"TIf 14011t"0 ARK
..a -641 0 901Ow.O"MIN 11041
o CA?* OROWNapN GREEN61N ACIO. Stuga Pao, TIlLOVI
_ __
_ .___
I OPNl Of POSIowmaNo C.PtqO1 %CRaTC4H
0'114 A0,11I4 0wICLILtO
SCRAtO@ USIA?..'
II sCPAVC.FO w KNIFEIC(A-1.I SCATCHEDU,??. .5-te
fs SCNACPS ot"I,'AOIPS4AIL
'6051o 0ttoSIOIPI
Si SIO#4?LVM MICK"M
SO OIN G1LLW
C COAASIis 040OF1O0t100P *1f00wwAN1
L OW
11 O~TL 0PAP9 OF I VP rittIOPAITW
JOINT$ I011O """ I 1c4ILE04 MLI
, .
23 04 OF FOLLOWINI #u4(oa6ITM WFORJM .04.IrC C(PAN!I 1.11?T
'4 0.4 OF 101O00VW )10S9FTIN 3STOIOSTLE $01030lTC IFOITOI*1IE?IC <.I FT
is 0401O01O10.4N* *1DOINGJ JOINT
i. 17.hff1DES04OZO&lwe1S 0*46 CO11POLL
SOU0ND4A £111.40VA vto? A&TIPIO
I1104010F11OL0530
NE 0040OF101O04CL CY$S 94*1Rsitlso ANO,GON ONAYSIUA UIPIIAUZPIH "1*10itO* .*qIENICIAA
a-
0
Ln
It<
cz0
..
tp
-4
M
9
-40
a05,a
H0
(A
-4
I I .5 .5 .5 ____________ .5 1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . .'-I I'
0 -
C+ =
aD M(D
.
: . . ... . .
.
Eli
Figure 2. Thea FeiiId Mirk Cure hiug (FIWI.) turin'ed for rondirg data fr cam/iunter input.
C. C CFIELD DATA
o e M"O._.". .
I
t
Figure 4. A rpical borehole log traced direcll from a computer printout.
-1
4rir ntrum i ur urttA I iUNiDate: Mo._ _ Day __ Yr.
141 I tL FllI iL 4Rockwell Contract No.- -
Hole Number: _t" fhmen tt)-
Location Of Hole: Area: Type Hole _O lt 0 2nd 03rd
Core Rig Fluid Level Time Distribution From:
l001 Moving To:
Rotary Ground Elevation Setting Up Personnel
Size Hole Tearing Down Driller_(Acceptance)
Size Casing. Depth Start Drilling Helper
Casinp r Depth Fishing Helper
Start Depth End Cementing Laborers
Casing To Depth W.O.C.
End Footage In Overburden Drilling Cement
Fooiage By Dive Barrel Testing Mud Used
Footage In Basalt Repairs
Footage By Sit Standby
Footage In Interbed Weather
sit No. Rockwell Time
Reamer No. Drilling Mud Condition Contractor Time
Et Type Vis. Wt. Compressor Hours Cubic Ft. Cement Used
Sit Cndicion WL Ph. Generator Hours
un - From T Feet Driled Core Recovered . e r| Core time Remarks
Daily Iot_ _ _ __ P rj _ __ _ _ __ _ _~ I ___ __ _ _ __
__ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ ._____
______ I ______ ________ ____ = = - .-_
Daily Footage: Report No. project:
. Repr,
rl�'�
Approved By:
Tti, Itibut;on: White - Basalt Records Retention Center
Green - Drilling & Testing Field File
Canary - Contract File
R.e .. ei rWA
Pink - Site Analyis GroupGoldenrod - Geoschence GroutButt Hard Copy - Retain At Welhite
SC440 072 R6-C82
Date: Mo. Day Yr SHIFT REPORT OF OPERATIONSATTACHMENT 5
r --- - ,r -,^ - ( I+, t+ 7 )-_____ . - nockweiu Contrac ro.A % n , L . 1 I
Hole Number: SHIFT
Location Of Hole: _ Area: Type Hole - 0 1st 0 2nd C' 3rd
K
Continuation of Report No.: Proiect:
I ~port By: - Approved By: __
la4itle: ___ Title:
Distribution: White - Basalt Records Retention Cent.- Pink - Site Analysis Group BC440O 1 ,I N 9 :
Vrecn - ruiang & Testing FieI lhCanary - Contract File
Goldenrod - Go Sciences GroupBuff Hard Copy - Retain at Wellsite
DO E W&
