1
I & O Charting Current Practices and Recommendations for Change Purpose Analyze the actual practice of I&O charting on three patient care units Compare the perceptions of providers, and nurses regarding I&O practices Describe ancillary staff perceptions regarding I&O practices Methods Written Questionnaire Questionnaires sent to all providers and staff on sample units Instrument adapted from Chung, et al (2002) using a Likert 1 to 4 scale PCTs have added open ended questions Retrospective Chart Review 63 medical records based on 20% of average number of patient discharges stratified/unit average Chart selection using random table Chart Review Instrument and protocol adapted from Chung, et al (2002) Statistics • Descriptive t-test for independent groups to compare providers and nurses Research protocol, instruments, consent, and human subjects participation approved by University of Rochester Medical Center RSRB and Highland Hospital Administration. Limitations Sample: convenience and size Chart review: interrater reliability Too many DRGs to adequately correlate with practices Questionnaire: PCT/PSA PCT / PSA Perceptions of Fluid Balance Charting I&O is always recorded accurately. I&O totals are always accurately calculated. The method of recording I&Os is easy. I&Os are accurately recorded after each meal. Monitoring I&O is important for planning patient treatment. Weights are recorded as often as ordered. The method of recording weights is easy. Why are I&Os done? Why might patient weights be ordered daily? Questionnaire: Provider/Nurse Medical Providers Perceptions of Fluid Balance Charting I&O is always ordered appropriate to a patient’s condition. The I&O is always discontinued when it is not required. I&O is often done as a routine. I&O is used to estimate the fluid balance of the patient I&O is used to decide the treatment of the patient The data entry is always accurate for charting I&O. I&Os are accurately recorded after each meal. The calculation is always accurate for I&O totals. The method of recording I&Os is easy. It is appropriate for the 24 hour I&O total to be done at 10 p.m. Weighing a patient is always ordered appropriate to the patient’s condition. Weighing a patient is an accurate measure of fluid balance. Weights are recorded as often as ordered. The method of recording weights is easy. Abstract Staff members of the Highland Hospital Nursing Practice Committee brought forth clinical questions regarding the purpose, importance, and accuracy of Intake and Output (I&O) documentation, and whether the measurement of I&O is valued by medical providers and nursing personnel for clinical decision-making in patient care. At this facility it is typical practice to measure I&O on all patients who have IV fluids and/or drainage catheters. An extensive literature review revealed case reports of I&O practices, but minimal reported research. Therefore a research study was implemented at the facility that adapted a study done in Hong Kong by Chung, Chong, and French (2002). The specific aims of the study were to review actual I&O documentation practices in the medical record and to evaluate provider, nurse and technician perceptions of the value of I&O accuracy. The study involved a retrospective chart review conducted on 63 medical records to analyze I&O charting practices on a medical, a surgi- cal and a geriatric unit. Perceptions regarding I&O practices were obtained through a survey distributed to nurses, patient care technicians, and medical providers on the three units. Descrip- tive statistics were reported and a T-test for independent groups compared responses between medical providers and nurses. The chart review revealed that I&O forms were present 100% of the time in the medical record, but measurement was accurate in only 30% of the medical records. Infusion of IV fluids was the most frequent reason for I&O measurement (45% of the time). Medical providers and nurses agreed that I&O is used to estimate fluid balance, but 37% of charts had no reference to I&O measurements in progress notes and generally orders were not written for initiating or discontinuing I&O. Accuracy in measuring and documenting I&O was better on the surgical unit compared to the other two medical units. Surveys reveal that patient care technicians have a good understanding of the importance of I&O measurement, and that they believe the recording of I&O is more accurate than do nurses and medical providers. Study findings currently are being shared with various clinical practice councils for recommendations. Some recommendations for practice change include ordering and measuring I&O only when the information gathered will be used to make specific treatment decisions; specific orders for I&O would be written by medical providers or nurses; I&O orders would include a reason for the measurement; and if I&O is ordered there would be an expectation that documentation of I&O-based treatment decisions are recorded in the patient’s progress notes. Future plans include a follow-up chart review to assess whether these recommendations have improved accuracy of I&O charting. Further research is suggested to compare daily weights to I&O as an accurate measure of fluid balance. Primary Investigator Mary Ann Emerson, MS, RN, AOCN Co-investigators Charlene Smith, Doctoral Candidate, WHNP, BC Barbara Schrage, MS, FNP-C Barbara Trill, RN Tracie Ewing, BSN, CNM, MSEd Daniel Mendelson, MS, MD Summary & Conclusions Perceived that I&O measurement is not accurate Belief that monitoring is important for treatment Some differences in perceptions between providers/nurses PCTs understand purpose of I&O PCTs generally have higher scores than providers/nurses Differences between surgery and medicine Weights may be preferred over I&O but equipment access and manpower to do is an issue Recommendations for I&O Practice Change I&O will be measured only when ordered I&O measurement will be discontinued after 48 hours unless renewed Progress notes will reflect that I&O data is used to make treatment decisions IVF intake will always be measured and output from tubes will always be measured, full I&O will not be measured routinely Weights consistently done on admission and as ordered to monitor fluid blance Education regarding change in practice Further research Significant Mean Differences Between Groups: t test (p<.o5) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 I&O Ordered appropriate to patient condition I&O often done as routine I&O used to estimate patient fluid balance I&O used to decide patient treatment Method for recording I&O is easy Appropriate that 24 hour I&O is done at 2200 hours Values MD/PA Mean Value RN/LPN Mean Value

I & O Charting Current Practices and Recommendations for ......I&O-based treatment decisions are recorded in the patient’s progress notes. Future plans include a follow-up chart

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

I & O Charting Current Practices and Recommendations for Change

Purpose• Analyze the actual practice of I&O charting on three

patient care units• Compare the perceptions of providers, and nurses

regarding I&O practices• Describe ancillary staff perceptions regarding I&O

practices

Methods Written Questionnaire • Questionnaires sent to all providers and staff on

sample units • Instrument adapted from Chung, et al (2002) using a

Likert 1 to 4 scale • PCTs have added open ended questions

Retrospective Chart Review • 63 medical records based on 20% of average number

of patient discharges stratified/unit average • Chart selection using random table • Chart Review Instrument and protocol adapted from

Chung, et al (2002)

Statistics • Descriptive • t-test for independent groups to compare providers

and nurses

Research protocol, instruments, consent, and human subjects participation approved by University of Rochester Medical Center RSRB and Highland Hospital Administration.

Limitations • Sample: convenience and size • Chart review: interrater reliability • Too many DRGs to adequately correlate with practices

Questionnaire: PCT/PSAPCT / PSA Perceptions of Fluid Balance Charting• I&O is always recorded accurately.

• I&O totals are always accurately

calculated.

• The method of recording I&Os is easy.

• I&Os are accurately recorded after

each meal.

• Monitoring I&O is important for

planning patient treatment.

• Weights are recorded as often

as ordered.

• The method of recording weights

is easy.

Why are I&Os done?

Why might patient weights be

ordered daily?

Questionnaire: Provider/NurseMedical Providers Perceptions of Fluid Balance Charting• I&O is always ordered appropriate to a patient’s condition.

• The I&O is always discontinued when it is not required.

• I&O is often done as a routine.

• I&O is used to estimate the fluid balance of the patient

• I&O is used to decide the treatment of the patient

• The data entry is always accurate for charting I&O.

• I&Os are accurately recorded after each meal.

• The calculation is always accurate for I&O totals.

• The method of recording I&Os is easy.

• It is appropriate for the 24 hour I&O total to be done

at 10 p.m.

• Weighing a patient is always ordered appropriate to

the patient’s condition.

• Weighing a patient is an accurate measure of fluid

balance.

• Weights are recorded as often as ordered.

• The method of recording weights is easy.

AbstractStaff members of the Highland Hospital Nursing Practice Committee brought forth clinical

questions regarding the purpose, importance, and accuracy of Intake and Output (I&O)

documentation, and whether the measurement of I&O is valued by medical providers and

nursing personnel for clinical decision-making in patient care. At this facility it is typical practice

to measure I&O on all patients who have IV fluids and/or drainage catheters. An extensive

literature review revealed case reports of I&O practices, but minimal reported research.

Therefore a research study was implemented at the facility that adapted a study done in Hong

Kong by Chung, Chong, and French (2002). The specific aims of the study were to review actual

I&O documentation practices in the medical record and to evaluate provider, nurse and

technician perceptions of the value of I&O accuracy. The study involved a retrospective chart

review conducted on 63 medical records to analyze I&O charting practices on a medical, a surgi-

cal and a geriatric unit. Perceptions regarding I&O practices were obtained through a survey

distributed to nurses, patient care technicians, and medical providers on the three units. Descrip-

tive statistics were reported and a T-test for independent groups compared responses between

medical providers and nurses. The chart review revealed that I&O forms were present 100% of

the time in the medical record, but measurement was accurate in only 30% of the medical

records. Infusion of IV fluids was the most frequent reason for I&O measurement (45% of the

time). Medical providers and nurses agreed that I&O is used to estimate fluid balance, but 37%

of charts had no reference to I&O measurements in progress notes and generally orders were not

written for initiating or discontinuing I&O. Accuracy in measuring and documenting I&O was

better on the surgical unit compared to the other two medical units. Surveys reveal that patient

care technicians have a good understanding of the importance of I&O measurement, and that

they believe the recording of I&O is more accurate than do nurses and medical providers. Study

findings currently are being shared with various clinical practice councils for recommendations.

Some recommendations for practice change include ordering and measuring I&O only when the

information gathered will be used to make specific treatment decisions; specific orders for I&O

would be written by medical providers or nurses; I&O orders would include a reason for the

measurement; and if I&O is ordered there would be an expectation that documentation of

I&O-based treatment decisions are recorded in the patient’s progress notes. Future plans include

a follow-up chart review to assess whether these recommendations have improved accuracy of

I&O charting. Further research is suggested to compare daily weights to I&O as an accurate

measure of fluid balance.

Primary Investigator Mary Ann Emerson, MS, RN, AOCN

Co-investigators Charlene Smith, Doctoral Candidate, WHNP, BC Barbara Schrage, MS, FNP-C Barbara Trill, RN Tracie Ewing, BSN, CNM, MSEd Daniel Mendelson, MS, MD

Summary & Conclusions• Perceived that I&O measurement is not accurate• Belief that monitoring is important for treatment• Some differences in perceptions between providers/nurses• PCTs understand purpose of I&O• PCTs generally have higher scores than providers/nurses• Differences between surgery and medicine• Weights may be preferred over I&O but equipment access and manpower to do is an issue

Recommendations for I&O Practice Change• I&O will be measured only when ordered• I&O measurement will be discontinued after 48 hours unless renewed• Progress notes will reflect that I&O data is used to make treatment decisions• IVF intake will always be measured and output from tubes will always be measured, full I&O will not be measured routinely• Weights consistently done on admission and as ordered to monitor fluid blance• Education regarding change in practice• Further research

Significant Mean Differences Between Groups: t test (p<.o5)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

I&O Ordered appropriateto patient condition

I&O often done as routine I&O used to estimatepatient fluid balance

I&O used to decide patienttreatment

Method for recording I&Ois easy

Appropriate that 24 hourI&O is done at 2200 hours

Val

ues

MD/PA Mean Value

RN/LPN Mean Value