Upload
ishi
View
36
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
(II) Regional Bedrock Geology (Figure 4). The exposed bedrock in East and West Antarctica is compositionally different, thus the till from the two regions should be different as well. We assume that the composition of the till reflects the composition of the rocks over which ice flowed. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
(I) Introduction to the Problem and BackgroundLGM flow dynamics of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) and West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) are not well constrained. The expanded LGM Ross Ice Sheet followed Ross Sea Floor bathymetry via troughs, however the origin of the ice filling the troughs remains uncertain. Currently, disagreement exists surrounding the EAIS and WAIS contribution to the expansion of the LGM Ross Ice Sheet. Contrasting models predict either a predominantly WAIS (Fig. 1), or a somewhat even contribution from both the EAIS and WAIS (Fig. 2 & 3).
Previous investigations aimed at characterizing LGM Ross Sea till do not directly correlate the till with an East or West Antarctic source (i.e. Balshaw, 1981; Anderson et al., 1992). Since these previous studies, several improvements have been made in Ross Sea core coverage and till availability from beneath the WAIS. In this study, the sand petrography of West and East Antarctic till is Ross Sea till is then compared to these source terranes to determine the most likely provenance. The results from this study can be used in determine the paleo flow-dynamics of the LGM Ross Ice Sheet.
(IV) Methodology• Obtained till from six regions in East Antarctica and from
beneath the Whillans Ice Stream and Ice Stream C in West Antarctica
• Obtained till from sixteen cores from across the Ross Sea• Petrographically analyzed the 500 – 2000 μm sand fraction
using Indiana Method of point counting method. Indiana Method categorizes lithic fragments according to
their mineralogy, whereby a grain with two+ mineral fragments is classified as a lithic fragment.
• Plotted data according to their normalized quartz, feldspar, and mafic intrusive lithic fragment (QFM) and quartz, mafic intrusive, and sedimentary lithic fragment concentrations (QSM) (Figure 5).
• Statistically analyzed results with cluster analysis (Figure 6) and discriminant analysis (Figure 7)
• Contains till deposited during the LGM ice sheet expansion.• Characterized by NE-SW trending troughs and ridges interpreted
to be remnant glacial features.• CRS and ERS troughs contain paleo ice-flow features (i.e.
drumlins, lineations, etc. (Shipp et al., 1999).
(III) Ross Sea
Abstract No: 55816
Provenance of Ross Sea TillJason Lederer, Kathy J. Licht, R. Jeffery Swope
Geology Department, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Denton and Hughes (2000)
Figure 3
180o
Figure 3
180o
Licht and Fastook (1998)
WA
EA
Figure 2
Stuiver et al., 1981Stuiver et al. (1981)
E
180o
180o
WA
EA
Figure 1Stuiver et al. (1981)
The exposed bedrock in East and West Antarctica is compositionally different, thus the till from the two regions should be different as well. We assume that the composition of the till reflects the composition of the rocks over which ice flowed. Though not shown on this map, West Antarctic rocks are rift associated flood basalts Behrendt et al., 1994) overlain by unlithified sediment derived from marine and terrigenous input (Rooney et al., 1991).
Pre-Cretaceous strata,upper Paleozoic and/orlower Mesozoic
RISP
David Glacier
Ice Stream D
Drygalski Ice Tongue
Figure 4
Ice Stream E
From American Map Folio series, 1970 – American Geographical Society
McMurdo Volcanic Group (olivine basalt, trachyte, kenyte, pyroclastic deposits)
Ferrar Group (tholeiitic flows, sandstone lenses, agglomerate tuff, volcanic conglomerateGranite Harbour Intrusives (biotite-hornblende granodiorite and hornblende granite)
Byrd Group (marble, limestone, oolitic limestone, quartzite, conglomerate, sandstone, volcanic rocks
Nimrod Group (quartzite, marble, schist, diorite, gneiss, ecologite lenses)
Beardmore Group (pelitic schist, hornfels, metagraywacke, argillite)
Beacon Group (sandstone, shale, coal measures with tholeiitiic dikes, sills, and plugs
Basement Complex – metasedimentary rocks
(II) Regional Bedrock Geology (Figure 4)
Acknowledgements:Contributors: H. Engelhardt – California Institute of Technology, J. Bockheim – University of Wisconsin – Madison, G. Faure – The Ohio State University, T. Janecek – Florida State University, Antarctic Research FacilityFunding from the Geological Society of America, NSF Office of Polar Programs, IUPUI Geology and Graduate SchoolDr. Kathy Licht, Dr. R. Jeffery Swope, Dr. Andy Barth, Dr. Joe Pachut (statistics), Bob E. Hall and Dr. Jeffery Wilson (GIS)
(VI) Conclusions• East and West Antarctic source areas have distinct petrologic signatures.• Ross Sea till exhibits E-W petrologic variability.• WRS till exhibits petrographic similarities to adjacent areas of East Antarctica• ERS till exhibits petrographic similarities to adjacent West Antarctica • Although ERS and WRS are compositionally similar to adjacent areas of
Antarctica, transport by ice has caused maturation of the lithologic and mineralogic counterparts. (Note: Particle size analysis results not presented here show that Ross Sea till has a smaller average particle-size than East and West Antarctic till)
• CRS till exhibits compositional similarities to both ERS and WRS tills which can be used as proxies for East and West Antarctic source areas. Several Ross Sea till samples contain distinctive provenance indicators (i.e. oolitic limestone, calcite, marble, etc.)
• Distinctive lithic fragments serve as tracers• Results suggest an moderately even contribution from the EAIS and WAIS to
the expansion of the LGM Ross Ice Sheet, correlating well with the models of Fastook and Licht (1998) and Denton and Hughes (2000) following Ross Sea troughs (consistent with Shipp et al. (1999) paleo ice-flow directional indicators).
ReferencesAnderson, J.B., Shipp, S.S., Bartek, L.R., and Reid, D.E., 1992, Evidence for a grounded ice sheet on the Ross Sea continental shelf during the Late Pleistocene and preliminary paleodrainage reconstruction.
Marine Geology, v. 57, p.295 – 333.
Balshaw, K.M., 1980, Antarctic glacial chronology reflected in the Oligocene through Pliocene sedimentary section in the Ross Sea. Ph.D. Thesis, Rice University, 140 p.
Licht, K.J., and Fastook, J., 1998, Constraining a numerical ice sheet model with geologic data over one ice sheet advance/retreat cycle in the Ross Sea. Chapman Conference on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, University of Maine, p.25-26.
Shipp, S.S., Anderson, J.B., and Domack, E.W., 1999, Seismic signature of the Late Pleistocene fluctuation of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet system in the Ross Sea: A new perspective, Part 1. Geological Society of America Bulletin, V.111, n.10, p.1486 – 1516.
Stuiver, M., Denton, G.H., Hughes, T.J., and Fastook, J.L., 1981, History of the marine ice sheets in West Antarctica during the last glaciation: A working hypothesis. In Denton, G.H. and Hughes, T.J.eds, The last great ice sheets: New York, Wiley-Interscience, p.319-439.
a.
Function 1:felsic igneous fragmentsIntermediate igneous fragmentsextrusive volcanic fragmentsopaque mineralscalcitepotassium feldsparplagioclasemudstone fragmentssandstone fragmentsclaystone fragments
Function 2:metamorphic igneous fragmentsmafic igneous fragmentsbiotiteiron orequartzolivinechlorite
Function 1:intermediate igneous fragmentsmetamorphic fragmentsextrusive volcanic fragmentslimestone fragmentssandstone/siltstone fragmentsclaystone fragmentspyroxenepotassium feldsparbiotitechlorite
Function 2:mudstone fragmentsmafic fragmentsfelsic fragmentsolivineiron orecalcitequartz
Function 3:opaque mineralsmuscovite
Canonical Scores Plot
-6 -1 4 9FACTOR(1)
-6
-1
4
9
FAC
TOR
(2)
321
VARIABLE
Function 1
Fu
nct
ion
2
EA (1)
EAWARS
EA + RS (3)
Function 1 Function 2
Fu
nct
ion
3F
un
ctio
n 2
2a2b
2c
2d
• Confirms that the groups formed by cluster analysis are statistically distinct.
• Determines which mineral and lithic fragments components in the till are important factors in forming the cluster groups.
Figure 7. Discrminant analysis plots: ellipses represent the 95% confidence interval surrounding the average grouping score for each cluster.
East Antarctic and West Antarctic Till Composition• East and West Antarctic till reflect regional geology.• East Antarctic till is dominantly mafic intrusive, felsic
intrusive, metamorphic (quartzite, calcite), sedimentary (mudstone), volcanic extrusive.
• West Antarctic till is dominantly well rounded quartz, feldspar, felsic intrusive – distinctive feature to is biotite, quartz, hornblend, and/or chlorite – rich felsic intrusive fragments. Sediment likely derived from Transantarctic Mountains to the north during ice free conditions.
(V) Results
Magnification 100x
quartz
?
Figure 9
Ross Ice Shelf
RISP
Whillians Ice Stream
Binschadler Ice Stream
Kamb Ice Stream
MacAyel Ice Stream
Mt. Achernar
Beardmore Glacier
Nim
rod
Gla
cier
Byrd
Gla
cier
Darwin G
lacier
Hatherton Glacier
Allan Hills
David Glacier
Mercer Ice Stream
S
EA
WA
9902 - 04
Victoria Land
Marie ByrdLand
Holyoake Range
DryglaskiIce Tongue
Coulman Island
9902 - 05
9407 - 63
9501 - 24
9501 - 07EL - 32
WRSCRS
ERS
9501 - 179407 - 39
Dry
gals
ki T
roug
hPennellBank
EasternBasin
JOID
ES
B
asin
-500
9501 - 30
9401 - 01
9902 - 17
9902 - 08
9501 - 35
Magnification 400xSAL 3 – x-polars
hornblende
biotitequartz
SAL 540 - ppl
Oolitic limestone
Magnification 100x
?
Figure 8.
Figure 6. Resulting dendogram from cluster analysis of till samples from East Antarctica, West Antarctica and Ross Sea.
Sample Locations
Cluster Tree
0 5 10 15Distances
WASAL1WASAL3
WASAL122WASAL123
EASAL106
EASAL114
EASAL119
EASAL186EASAL187
EASAL192
EASAL193
RIPSSAL219RISPSAL222
EASAL226EASAL227
CRSK15CRSK23CRSK33
CRSK53
CRSSAL230
CRSSAL534
CRSSAL537
CRSSAL538
CRSSAL540CRSSAL543
WRSSAL306
WRSSAL368
WRSSAL369
WRSSAL371
WRSSAL373
WRSSAL374
WRSSAL375
WRSSAL376WRSSAL403
WRSSAL404
WRSSAL405
WRSSAL406
WRSSAL407WRSSAL408
ERSSAL138
ERSSAL141
ERSSAL142
ERSSAL169
ERSSAL177
ERSSAL178
A
B
C
D
DarwinUpper BeardmoreHatherton
Ice Stream CIce Stream CWhillans Ice StreamWhillans Ice StreamNBP9501 - 17DF80 - 193DF80 - 193NBP9501 - 11NBP9501 - 17NBP9501 - 17NBP9501 - 17RISPRISPNBP9501 - 24NBP9501 - 12NBP9501 - 07NBP9902 - 08NBP9902 - 17NBP9902 - 04NBP9902 - 04NBP9907 - 63NBP9902 - 16NBP9902 - 05Hatherton/DarwinNBP9501 - 35EL32 - 13NBP9501 - 35NBP9501 - 30EL32 - 13EL32 - 13DF80 - 193EL32 - 13Upper BeardmoreCentral Beardmore
NBP9401 - 01Darwin TerminusDF80 - 193NBP9501 - 11NBP9501 - 17NBP9401 - 01Mt. AchernarAllan Hills
1
2
3
Cluster
ERSSAL306
Three clusters form at a Euclidean distance of ~9.5.
• There are four subclusters of cluster 2 formed at a Euclidean distance of ~ 5.
• Weak clustering between source terrane and Ross Sea tills, however, some overlap does occur.
• The three areas of the Ross Sea cluster separately on dendogram.
• There is little overlap between East and West Antarctic source area tills indicating that they are distinct.
East AntarcticaWestern Ross SeaWest Antarctica
Eastern Ross SeaCentral Ross Sea
RISP
Figure 5
• East and West Antarctic samples do not exhibit overlap.
• Western Ross Sea (WRS) samples plot close to East Antarctic samples.
• Eastern Ross Sea (ERS) samples plot close to West Antarctic samples.
• Central Ross Sea (CRS) samples plot between ERS and WRS samples.
• RISP samples plot similarly to West Antarctic samples on QSM ternary and similarly to East Antarctic samples on QFM ternary.
Felsic igneous fragments with characteristic quartz, biotite, hornblende composition occur in West Antarctica and the CRS.
Oolitic limestone occurs in CRS LGM till and has one documented occurrence in Ross Embayment in the Shackleton Formation Limestone in the Holyoake Range near Nimrod Glacier (Fig. 9).
9501 - 12
9501 - 11
80 - 193
9501 - 39-2000
-1000