1

From: George Mulligan <georgeemcom@yahoo.com>Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 12:38 PMTo: Thomas Yemm; Scott & Dana Farrington-Posner; Tina Manus; Charlie Perez; Tom Smith;

Paul Rohaly; Ron Mazz; Melvin Mason; John Burgeson; Jennings, Ronald; DiLorenzo, James; Matt Catalano; Mark Dumas; GAVIN B. FORRESTER III; Olson, Bryan; Murphy, Jim

Subject: Re: Raymark - Figure showing trichloroethene (TCE) plumeAttachments: Figure 4-6 from 213059.pdf

I didn't have the forwarded map of Raymark / Contract Plating

ground water plume.

Ron Jennings emailed Tom Yemm, who forwarded to me.

EPA used 13 YEAR OLD DATA in July 2016 public presentation,

despite the disclaimers in the notes and the computer technology

& analytics used was likely more than 15 years old

Please magnify and read the notes, from which I excerpted: 1 - Maps were from 2002 - 2003!? (MULLIGAN: 13 years ago) 2 - The areal extent of contamination may be greater than that shown. (??? !!!) Colored portion of the map represent the areal extent of the modeling domain. (MULLIGAN: THIS DATA was from 1990s to 2002 FREAPIN COMPUTERS ??? NO UPDATED DATA? LAZY? R E C K L E S S endangerment?? 3 - Computer model smooths data values. As a result , actual concentrations at some locations may be SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT than those SHOWN. WTF? This was A F T E R the 2001 (3 year old) Melonie Russell incident involving FREAPING BRAIN CANCER from WATER into VOC? 4 - The plume MAPS have been MODIFIED .... 5 - ALL locations are considered APPROXIMATE 8 - .... COMMON PROBLEM with COMPUTERS are PRINTERS ... (MULLIGAN: THIS DATA was from 1990s to 2002 FREAPIN COMPUTERS ???

2

NO UPDATED DATA? LAZY? R E C K L E S S endangerment?? A JULY 2016 EPA presentation to Stratford Citizens used 13 year old DATA, that has NO ADDED UPDATED WORK done ..... even though the EPA spent about $ 1 million on installing Basement Vents, subsequently . even though the EPA spent about $ 1 million on repairing Basement Vents, subsequently . Where is the PROFESSIONAL PRIDE and CARE about PEOPLES HEALTH that EPA officials stressed in their presentation? I like Murph, Ron, Marilyn, Jim and believe they mean well and are good people ..... However the DATA used reflects .... lack of caring .... about peoples lives! Please PLAN BETTER !!! Negligence? Recklessness? Criminal? Civil? Please RESEARCH and USE CURRENT or VERY RECENT DATA !!! If I were the EPA ..... I'd be asking for CT STATE for a new epidemographical Health Study Bryan Olson. Bryan is the Director of the Superfund Program (Office of Site Remediation and Restoration); olson.bryan@epa.gov and 617-918-1201. George Mulligan 429 Housatonic Avenue Stratford, CT. 06615 (203) 378-1888 georgeemcom@yahoo.com

On Monday, August 1, 2016 10:47 AM, Thomas Yemm <tyemm@earthlink.net> wrote:

See the attached; while I’d be very surprised if you did not already have this file, you certainly have it now. Would make a good t-shirt design too. Tom

From: "Jennings, Ronald" <Jennings.Ron@epa.gov> Date: Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 11:34 AM To: Thomas Yemm <tyemm@earthlink.net> Cc: "Loughlin, Anni" <loughlin.anni@epa.gov>, "St. Fleur, Marilyn" <StFleur.Marilyn@epa.gov>, "DiLorenzo, James" <dilorenzo.jim@epa.gov> Subject: Raymark ‐ Figure showing trichloroethene (TCE) plume 

Tom, As you requested through Anni Loughlin, attached is a figure showing the groundwater plume of TCE at Raymark. We have more recent data but because the concentrations have not changed considerably over time there has not been a need to create updated figures. The attached figure 4-6 is quite large and is more easily viewed when magnified to the point that you can see the streets and buildings. Any issues or questions, feel free to get in touch.

3

617 918 1242.