40
Hydro Power 102 Hydro Power 102

Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Hydro Power 102Hydro Power 102

Page 2: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Hydroelectric ModelsHydroelectric Modelsin thein the

NorthwestNorthwest

Page 3: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Three Regional Models

Hydro Simulator Program (HYDROSIM)– Bonneville Power Administration

Hydro System Seasonal Regulation (HYSSR)– Corps of Engineers

PNCA Seasonal Regulation (HYDREG)– Northwest Power Pool

Page 4: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Common Elements

Simulate the hydroelectric operation over 14 periods per year (split April and August)

Share hydroelectric project data Share historical stream flow/irrigation data Share flood control data

Page 5: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

HYDROSIM - BPA

Columbia River Treaty (Coordination with the Canadian Operation)

White Book (NW Loads and Resources)

EIS (Environmental Impact Statement)

Biological Opinion (Endangered Species)

Long-term planning

Page 6: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

HYSSR - Corps

Columbia River Treaty (Coordination with the Canadian Operation)

Flood Control Development

EIS (Environmental Impact Statement)

Biological Opinion (Endangered Species)

Evaluation of System Changes (new storage, revised irrigation withdrawals, etc.)

Page 7: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

HYDREG - PNCA

Power Pool Operating Program

Critical Period Evaluation

FELCC

(Firm Energy Load Carrying Capability)

Headwater Benefits

Each Party’s Rights and Obligations

Page 8: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Modeling the Modeling the Hydroelectric SystemHydroelectric System

Page 9: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Tapping the Power of the RiverA Few Definitions

Potential Energy = stored energy proportional to the height above ground

Kinetic Energy = energy of motion proportional to the velocity

Page 10: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Tapping the Power of the River

A ball resting at the top of an incline has no motion and thus no kinetic energy.

With a little push, the ball rolls down the incline, picking up speed as it rolls.

At the bottom, the ball has its highest speed but can fall no further.

This is an example of converting potential energy to kinetic energy.

Page 11: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Tapping the Power of the River

Water in the forebay is passed through a turbine.

As the water falls, it forces the turbine blades to turn.

As the turbine rotates, it converts the mechanical energy of rotation into electricity.

Thus, we can capture some of the water’s potential energy.

Page 12: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Tapping the Power of the River

Power = Flow x Head x ConstantPower is measured in megawatts (million watts)

Flow is measured in cubic feet per second

Head is measured in feet

Constant is a function of the turbine’s efficiency

Example at Grand Coulee DamFlow is 100,000 cubic feet per second

Head is 328 feet

Constant is .075

Power = 100,000 x 328 x .075 = 2,460 megawatts

Page 13: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

A Simple Example One River, One DamNo Storage, No Constraints

Energy as a function of Volume Runoff

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Volume Runoff (Maf)

En

erg

y (a

MW

)

Page 14: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

A Simple Example One River, One DamNo Storage, No Constraints

Distribution of Volume Runoff

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Volume Runoff (Maf)

Pro

bab

ilit

y

Page 15: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Developing a Planfor Our Simple System

What is the range of generation?

What is the average generation?

How much generation can we guarantee (year after year)?

What can we do to increase the amount of guaranteed generation?

Page 16: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Statistics for Our System

Minimum Runoff Volume 20 Maf

Minimum Generation 2,000 aMW

Maximum Runoff Volume 100 Maf

Maximum Generation 10,000 aMW

Average Runoff Volume 60 Maf

Average Generation 6,000 aMW

Guaranteed Energy 2,000 aMW

Page 17: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Improving Our Simple Systemby adding 20 Maf of Storage

What is the range of generation?

What is the average generation?

How much generation can we guarantee (year after year)?

Page 18: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Our Modified System

When storage is full:

minimum generation 4,000 aMW

average generation 8,000

maximum generation 12,000

When storage is half full:

minimum generation 3,000 aMW

average generation 7,000

maximum generation 11,000

Page 19: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Guaranteed generation depends on how much water is in the reservoir

Guaranteed Generation:

Condition 1 (full) 4,000 aMW

Condition 2 (half full) 3,000 aMW

Condition 3 (empty) 2,000 aMW

Page 20: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Improving Our Systemby Taking Some Chances

Distribution of Volume Runoff

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Volume Runoff (Maf)

Pro

bab

ilit

y

95 %

Page 21: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Guaranteed Generation can be Increased if Contingency Actions are in Place

95 % of the time the runoff volume is at least 30 Maf

Contract with a customer to drop load in case of low water in return for better price

This action effectively increases the guaranteed generation by 1,000 aMW

Page 22: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Monthly Distributionof

Demand and Generation

Page 23: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Generation from Flow

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000Flow

Page 24: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Shape of Demand

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

Demand

Page 25: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Critical Period Planning

Required by the Pacific NW Coordination Agreement

Portion of the historical water record that produces the least amount of energy (namely the driest conditions)

Reservoirs are drafted from full to empty Stored water is used to maximize the

generation while matching the monthly shape of demand

Results in the Firm Energy Load Carrying Capability (FELCC)

Page 26: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Guaranteed GenerationNo Storage

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000Flow

Demand

SurplusSurplus

Page 27: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Guaranteed GenerationWith Storage

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000New Flow

Firm Gen

Page 28: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Shape of Electricity PricesCompared to the Shape of NW Demand

15

25

35

45$/

MW

-hou

r

Demand

Prices

Page 29: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Developing Operating Guidelinesfor the

Hydroelectric System

Page 30: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Rule Curves

Rule curves are simply elevations at each reservoir that help guide the operation (i.e. drafting or filling)

Rule curves specify the highest and the lowest elevation that a reservoir should be operated to in order to stay within the planning objective

Intermediate rule curves help determine which projects release water first when energy is needed

Page 31: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Rule Curves

Flood Control– defines the drawdown required to assure

adequate space to store the anticipated runoff without causing downstream flooding (Maximum Elevation).

Critical Rule Curve– defines how deep a reservoir can be

drafted in order to meet the firm energy requirements during the poorest water conditions on record (Minimum Elevation).

Page 32: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Rule Curves

Assured Refill Curve– represents the elevation from which the

reservoir could refill given the water conditions that occurred in 1931.

Variable Refill Curve (Energy Content Curve)– represents the elevation from which the

reservoir could refill given current water conditions.

Page 33: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Rule Curves

Actual Energy Regulation (AER)– defines how deep a reservoir can be

drafted in order to meet the firm energy requirements during the current water conditions.

Proportional Draft Point (PDP)– same as the AER above.

Page 34: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Rule Curves

0

900

1800

2700Co

nten

t (ks

fd)

Flood

Refill

AER

CriticalMinimum Content

Maximum Content

Page 35: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Value of Water in Storage

Very Cheap

Moderate

Expensive

Very Expensive

Em ergency Only

Flood Control Curve

Assured Refill Curve

Actual Energy Regulation

Critical Rule Curve

Em pty

Page 36: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

How the Model Works

Page 37: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

General Methodology

Starting with the most upstream reservoir, draft (or fill) each dam to its Variable Refill Curve

Check for constraint violations Calculate total generation If generation equals desired amount, we’re

done If generation is less than desired,

proportionally draft If generation is greater than desired,

proportionally fill

Page 38: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Calculating the Desired Amount of Hydro Energy

Start with NW firm demand Subtract (or add) firm contracts (i.e. exports

and imports) Subtract the expected thermal operation Subtract generation from miscellaneous

resources and small hydro Yields a residual demand that must be served

by the hydro system

Page 39: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

Non-Power Constraints

Physical limits (i.e. top & bottom of dam) Maximum flow due to channel restriction Maximum elevation for flood control Maximum flow due to rate of draft limit Operational minimum & maximum flow rate Operational minimum elevation Water budget flow target Spill level

Page 40: Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest

GENESYSGENESYSNorthwestNorthwest

A PC based program, incorporating the HYDROSIM algorithms

Performs stochastic (probabilistic) studies Dynamically simulates the interaction of

hydro, thermal and out-of-region resources Identifies potential reliability shortfalls, both

long-term (energy deficiencies) and short-term (peaking or capacity problems)

Assesses changes in the physical operation of the hydro system