Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    1/12

    Hydraulic Conveying Association of South Africa

    4thOne Day Seminar on Hydraulic Transport in the Mining Industry

    7 April 2003, Indaba Conference Centre

    How to Reduce Pipe Friction in Slurry Flows

    Dr Nigel Heywood

    Aspen Technology, Harwell, UK

    Abstract

    This paper describes three main methods for reducing the frictional pressure loss, andtherefore the pump discharge pressure requirement, when transporting viscous, often non-

    Newtonian, slurries and pastes in pipelines. The first method reduces the degree of

    flocculation of the particles in the slurry using suitable chemical additives, and thereby

    reduces the slurry viscosity. The second method makes use of boundary liquid (such as water,

    oil, or polymer solution) which is injected at comparatively small flowrates into the pipe

    downstream from the pump to form a lubricating annulus adjacent to the pipe wall. The third

    method involves gas injection into the pipe downstream from the pump to form a slug flow

    pattern which results in substantial frictional pressure loss reductions for shear-thinning, non-

    Newtonian slurry, initially flowing in the laminar flow regime prior to gas injection.

    1. Introduction

    Many new developments have taken place over the last few years in slurry handling practice

    (Heywood, 1999), and particularly in slurry pipeline technologies (Heywood & Alderman,

    2003). One example of this is the increased tendency for slurries and pastes containing very

    fine particles to be pumped at increasingly high concentrations. These slurries tend to be

    pseudo-homogeneous and do not segregate readily under gravity forces. They are often highly

    viscous and exhibit highly shear-thinning, non-Newtonian flow properties. Figure 1 indicates

    the typical consistency of these slurry types.

    Figure 1: Viscous, Fine Particle Slurry Discharging from a Pipe

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    2/12

    In addition, it is also possible to pump relatively low moisture, unsaturated (compressible)

    filter and centrifuge cakes (Figure 2) using both reciprocating positive displacement pumps

    and some classes of rotary pump using bridge breakers and single or double intermeshing,

    contra-rotating augers at the base of feed hoppers.

    Figure 2: Unsaturated Sewage Sludge from a Compression Cake Filter

    In order to pump both classes of slurry (either saturated paste or unsaturated cake) high pump

    discharge pressures are frequently required. These discharge pressures result in:

    High pumping power consumption

    High pump differential pressures, leading to pump slippage and higher wear rates in some

    pump types

    More expensive, thicker-walled pipe

    Less flexibility to pump slurry at higher, more viscous solids concentrations

    There are various techniques to reduce the frictional pressure loss in pipe flow, which is oftenthe major contribution to the pump discharge pressure. This paper describes three of these

    methods:

    1. Reduction in the level of particle flocculation through the use of additives to reduce the

    zeta potential on particle surfaces;

    2. Injection of water or some other liquid (such as oil or aqueous polymer solution) into the

    pump discharge pipe using an appropriate injection ring, thus creating a lubricating

    annulus in the pipe for the viscous slurry;

    3. Injection of air (or inert gas) into the pump discharge pipe to reduce the proportion of theinner pipe wall wetted by viscous slurry.

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    3/12

    2. Use of Addi tives to Disperse/Deflocculate Fine Slurry partic les

    Adding soluble ionic compounds to flocculated slurries (i.e. slurries where a significant

    proportion, say 5 to 10%, of solids are below approximately 5 m) can result in substantial

    pressure drop reductions in pipe flow in the laminar flow regime. However, the effect is

    usually not discernible in the turbulent regime. The ionic compounds disperse the particles,

    thereby breaking up the flocculated particle network that gives rise to higher shear stresses inpipe flow. In order to disperse particles, the charge on their surfaces needs to be of the same

    sign, and the higher the charge the greater the repulsive forces between particles.

    It is only relatively recently that the reduction in pressure drop has been related to the degree

    of deflocculation in quantitative terms. Several studies (Horsley et al, 1980 & 1982a, b) have

    been undertaken in which the zeta potential on particle surfaces, defined as the potential in the

    electrochemical double layer at the interface between a particle moving in an electric field and

    the surrounding liquid, has been measured and correlated with the pressure drop reduction.

    The zeta potential is a measure of the repulsive forces acting on the particles and thus is

    useful in measuring the dispersing effects of chemical additives.

    Figure 3 shows some typical head loss-slurry velocity data (Horsley & Reizes, 1980) for the

    flow of a 43% by volume sand slurry (37% by weight of particles less than 10 m) at different

    pH levels in the range 6.2 to 10.8; the pH was controlled by the addition of nitric acid and

    sodium hydroxide. The changes in pressure drop in the laminar regime were observed to be

    greater as the sand concentration was raised.

    Figure 3: Effect of pH and Zeta Potential on 43% Volume Concentration Sand Slurry

    (d50=17 m) in Pipe Flow (Horsley & Reizes, 1980)

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    4/12

    Figure 4 shows a plot of head loss against zeta potential. This illustrates that the higher the

    zeta potential (i.e. the larger the negative value) the lower the pressure drop.

    Figure 4: Effect of Zeta Potential on Head Loss Gradient for 33% and 43% Volume

    Concentrations of Sand Slurry (Horsley & Reizes, 1980)

    The effects of chemical additives have been studied (Sikorski et al, 1982)) on a number of

    mineral slurries including drilling muds (thinners such as sodium acid pyrophosphate and

    sodium hexametaphosphate), phosphate rock slurries (caustic soda), limestone cement feed

    (combination of sodium tripolyphosphate and sodium carbonate), and coal slurry (sodium

    tripolyphosphate, sodium dioctyl sulphosuccinate and sodium carbonate).

    Various alkaline additives have been used to modify the flow properties of coal-water slurries

    (Shook & Nurkoski, 1977 & Teckchandani & Shook, 1982). Several thinners have been

    investigated (McInnes, 2002) at different concentrations to reduce the viscosity of chalk

    slurry, so facilitating long distance pumping, and additives have been used to reduce pumping

    energy requirements for flyash waste slurries from power stations (Thomas & Sobota, 2002).

    The level of dispersion of a flocculated slurry, and therefore indirectly its viscosity level, can

    now be assessed on-line through zeta potential using commercially-available instrumentation.

    Off-line zeta potential measurements have been possible for some time. With the on-line

    instrument, an electroacoustic sensor (Hunter, 1998 & 2001) applies high-frequency

    alternating voltage pulses across the slurry. This causes the slurry particles to oscillate at avelocity that depends on their size and electric charge (or zeta potential). This particle motion

    generates sound waves, which in turn depend on particle size and zeta potential. The input

    voltage pulse is applied across two flat, parallel platinum electrodes that are in contact with

    the slurry.

    The slurry flows vertically upwards through a polyphenylenesulphide (PPS) spacer in the

    sensor. One of the platinum electrodes is coated onto a rectangular glass delay line, at the

    opposite end of which is mounted a thin ultrasonic transducer. The gated amplifier produces a

    pulse of high frequency alternating voltage of about 3 s duration, which is applied across the

    parallel electrodes. The resulting high frequency sound wave produced by the motion of the

    slurry particles in the alternating electric field travels down the glass delay line and is detectedby the ultrasonic transducer.

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    5/12

    The measured electrical signal, called the ESA, contains information about the particle size

    and charge, and is the primary measurement made by the electroacoustic sensor. The ESA

    measurement is repeated a number of times at a range of frequencies from 1 MHz to 20 MHz.

    The Fourier Transform of these signals is referred to as the ESA frequency spectrum. From

    this spectrum, the particle size distribution and the zeta potential are ultimately calculated.

    3. Injecting Boundary Layer Liquid into Pipe

    Very highly concentrated slurries can now be pumped using either progressive cavity or

    reciprocating piston pumps (Zey, 1999) by force-feeding the slurry into the pump body using

    various auger designs and bridge breakers at the base of wedge-shaped hoppers. Even

    unsaturated solid/liquid/air mixtures such as compressed filter or centrifuge cakes can be

    pumped in this way. To reduce the frictional pressure loss in the pump discharge pipe, it is

    now common for many pump manufacturers to offer boundary layer injection facilities

    whereby a liquid is injected at three or four points through the pipe wall to generate an

    annulus that helps to lubricate the flow. The liquid injected is often water but greater

    reductions in frictional pressure loss can be achieved using aqueous polymer solution, waste

    or heating oil or polyelectrolytes. Because the central slurry core is so concentrated andviscous, mixing between the annular wall layer of injection liquid and the slurry can be

    minimal so the friction reduction effect is maintained over a significant pipe length.

    Figure 5 shows a liquid injection arrangement supplied by Schwing America for their

    reciprocating piston pumps, and Figure 6 shows how a lubricating annulus is formed in the

    pipe.

    Figure 5: The Boundary Layer Injection Method used by Schwing Pumps

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    6/12

    Figure 6 : Details of the Schwing Pumps Boundary Layer Injection Method

    Figure 7 shows the extent of the reduction in pump discharge pressure for a progressive cavitypump which is pumping sewage sludge at various solids concentrations, and using water at

    two different concentrations of polymer solution. It can be seen that a 0.5% polymer solution

    injected at 20 litre/h into the pipe carrying sludge at 2 m3/h (1:100 flowrate ratio) gives rise to

    the greatest reduction in discharge pressure from 13 bar down to about 1.8 bar. Other

    conditions also give substantial reductions in discharge pressure.

    Figure 7: Reductions in Pump Discharge Pressure for Sewage Sludge using Alternative

    Boundary Layer Liquids (Courtesy, Seepex Pumps)

    The nature of the boundary layer fluid appears to have a significant effect on the pressure drop

    reduction on the pipe wall. Various liquids are used by Putzmeister Pumps depending on the

    application (Zey, 1999). Table 1 from Putzmeister shows the various liquids they use.

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    7/12

    Table 1 : Boundary Layer Fluids used by Putzmeister Pumps

    Boundary layer fluid Advantages Disadvantages Pressure Reduction

    Water Cheap Mixes with

    slurry/sludge

    20-50%

    Heating oil/waste oil Greater cost

    benefit when usedas combination

    aid

    Used only in

    incineration plant

    25-50%

    Polyelectrolytes High efficiency Mixing station may

    be required

    50-75%

    PMLC Extremely

    efficient

    Does not mix

    with slurry

    Mixing station

    required

    70-90%

    Figure 8 shows the substantial effect that either water injection or other special lubricant canhave on the pressure gradient (Zey, 1999).

    Figure 8: Putzmeister Pumps Data for Pressure Gradient Reduction

    for the Flow of 37 to 47% Sewage Sludge

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    8/12

    4. Injecting Air Downstream From Pump

    It has been known for several decades that injecting air (or another gas) into a shear-thinning

    slurry in laminar pipe flow will result in a reduction in frictional pressure loss. No such effect

    occurs for the laminar flow of a Newtonian slurry, or for the turbulent flow of a slurry having

    any specific laminar flow property. Figure 9 shows some typical data; the drag ratio in this

    figure is defined as the ratio of frictional pressure gradient along the pipe with gas injection tothat with no gas injection, at constant superficial slurry velocity, i.e., constant slurry flowrate.

    Figure 9: Typical Reductions in Frictional Pressure Loss for the Horizontal Pipeflow of

    Shear-thinning Slurry at Various Superfical Slurry Velocities (Farooqi et al, 1980)

    The friction reduction effect occurs in both horizontal (Heywood & Richardson, 1978, and

    Farooqi et al, 1980) and vertical (Heywood & Charles, 1980, and Khatib & Richardson, 1984)

    slurry pipe flows, and there is the additional advantage of reduced static head in vertical pipe

    flows. Figure 10 shows how the gas can distribute itself within the slurry in both pipe

    orientations, giving rise to six identifiable flow patterns in horizontal pipe flow, and four in

    vertical pipe flow. In horizontal pipeflow, frictional pressure loss reduction occurs for

    practical purposes mainly in bubble and plug or slug flow (intermittent flow), but it can occur

    in stratified flow at low slurry flowrates (Heywood & Charles, 1979).

    For a given flowrate combination of gas and slurry in a pipe, it is possible to predict the

    resultant flow pattern. This information is often presented in the form of a flow pattern map.An example of one developed for gas and non-Newtonian slurry flow in a horizontal pipe is

    given in Figure 11.

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    9/12

    Figure 10: Flow Patterns for Horizontal and Vertical Gas/Slurry Pipe Flow

    Figure 11: Flow Pattern Map for Gas/Slurry Flows in Horizontal Pipes

    (Chhabra & Richardson, 1984)

    Friction reduction is greater the more shear-thinning the slurry and a maximum effect occurs

    when the combined gas and slurry pipe flows nears the laminar-turbulent transition for the

    slurry flow. In this way, the maximum effect can be reliably predicted from a knowledge of

    the slurry rheological properties, the pipe diameter and the gas and slurry flowates. Figure 12

    shows the maximum reduction in frictional pressure drop as a function of the pipe Reynolds

    number for slurry flow alone.

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    10/12

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    11/12

    There are many advantages to using air injection:

    (1) reduced discharge pressure requirement for a slurry pump for a given slurry flowrate

    though a given discharge pipe length;

    (2) increased capacity of an existing pipeline carrying a given slurry while retaining the same

    pump system;(3) extension of an existing pipe run while maintaining the same discharge pressure;

    (4) application of an existing pump and pipeline combination to more viscous, shear-thinning

    slurry, while maintaining the same discharge pressure.

    (5) reduced pump differential pressure, and therefore reduced slippage in some pump types,

    with a corresponding reduction in pump wear.

    Surprisingly, the advantages of using air injection have still largely been overlooked by

    industry, although a Polish sugar factory takes full advantage of the technology when

    pumping waste molasses (Dziubinski & Fidos, 1992). Numerous examples of highly viscous,

    shear-thinning slurries being pumped through pipework occur in industry, e.g., red mud waste

    from alumina production, pulverised fuel ash slurry from power stations, titanium dioxideslurry, chalk and clay slurries, etc. Many of these operations could benefit from the

    appropriate application of air injection.

    5. Conclusions

    This paper has described three alternative methods to reduce pipe friction for highly viscous,

    often non-Newtonian slurries. In addition to frequent economic advantages to be had by

    employing one of these methods, other benefits also accrue. These include lower wear rates

    and therefore maintenance costs for pumps, and reduced instances of pipe blockages. These

    methods also increase the flexibility of existing pipeline systems when there is a requirement

    to increase slurry concentrations, and therefore slurry viscosities. It is recommended that each

    of these three methods is considered whenever an existing pipeline needs upgrading, or a new

    pipeline system is to be designed.

    References

    Chhabra, R.P. & Richardson, J.F. (1984) Prediction of flow pattern for the co-current flow of

    gas and non-Newtonian liquid in horizontal Pipes, Can J Chem Engng, Vol 62, Page 449-454.

    Dziubinski, M. & Fidos, H. (1992) An industrial installation for two-phase transportation of

    carbonation mud,Zuckerindustrie, Vol. 117, No.8, Pages 631-633.

    Farooqi, S.I. & Richardson, J.F. (1982) Horizontal flow of air and liquid (Newtonian and Non-

    Newtonian) in a smooth pipe. 2. Average pressure drop Trans I Chem E, Vol 60, Pages 323-333.

    Farooqi, S.I., Heywood, N.I & Richardson, J.F. (1980) Drag reduction by air injection for

    highly shear-thinning suspensions in horizontal pipeflow, Trans I Chem E, Vol 58, Pages 16-27.

    Heywood, N.I. (1999) Stop your slurries from stirring up trouble. Chemical Engineering

    Progress, September, Pages 21-41.

    Heywood N. I. & Richardson, J.F. (1978) Head loss reduction by gas injection for highly shear-thinning suspensions in horizontal pipe flow. In : Proc Hydrotransport 5, Paper C1. Organised

    by BHRA Fluid Engineering, UK.

  • 8/10/2019 Hydraulic Conveying Association[1]

    12/12

    Heywood, N. I. & Charles, M.E. (1979) The stratified flow of gas and non-Newtonian liquid

    in horizontal pipes.Int J Multiphase Flow, Vol 5, Pages 341-352.

    Heywood, N. I. & Charles, M E (1980) Effects of gas injection on the vertical pipeflow of

    fine slurry. In: Proc of Hydrotransport 7, Paper F5. Organised by BHRA Fluid Engineering,

    UK.

    Heywood, N. I. & Alderman, N.J. (2003) Developments in slurry pipeline technologies.

    Chemical Engineering Progress, April, Pages 100-107.

    Horsley, R.R. (1982a) Viscometer and pipe loop tests on gold slime slurry at very high

    concentrations by weight, with and without additives. In : Proc. of Hydrotransport 8. Paper

    H1, Organised by BHRA Fluid Engineering, UK.

    Horsley, R. R. (1982b) The relationship between zeta potential and head loss gradients for

    slurry pipe flow with varying pipe diameter and volumetric concentrations J Pipelines, Vol

    3, Pages 87-96.

    Horsley, R.R. & J. A. Reizes (1980) The effects of zeta potential on the head loss gradient

    for slurry pipelines with varying slurry concentrations. In : Proc. Hydrotransport 7. Paper

    D3, Organised by BHRA Fluid Engineering.

    Hunter, R. J. (1998)Recent developments in the electroacoustic characterisation of colloidal

    suspensions and emulsions, Colloids & Surfaces, Vol A141, Pages 37-65.

    Hunter, R. J. (2001) Measuring zeta potential in concentrated industrial slurries . Colloids &

    Surfaces, Vol A195, Pages 205-214.

    Khatib, Z. & Richardson, J. F. (1984) Vertical co-current flow of air and shear-thinning

    suspensions of kaolin. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., Vol 62, Pages 139-154.

    McInnes, M.-A. (2002) Investigation into the effects of slurry thinners on the rheology of chalk

    slurry. In : Proc of Hydrotransport 15, Banff, Canada, Pages 375-384. Organised by BHR

    Group Ltd, Cranfield, UK.

    Shook, C. A. & Nurkoski, J. (1977) Effect of some alkaline additives on the viscosity of coal

    water slurries. Can. J. Chem.Eng., Vol 55, Pages 510-515.

    Sikorski, C. F., et al. (1982) The effects of viscosity reducing chemical additives on slurry

    rheology and pipeline transport performance for various mineral slurries. In : Proc 7th

    Slurry

    Transport Association Conference, pp 163-173.

    Teckchandani, N. & Shook, C.A. (1982) Effect of a consistency-reducing additive on coal

    slurry pipeline pressure drop.J Pipelines, Vol 2, Pages 43-47.

    Thomas, A. D. & Sobota, J. (2002)Influence of additives on energy loss in pipeline flow of

    flyash mixtures In : Proc of Hydrotransport 15, Banff, Canada, Pages 329-343. Organised

    by BHR Group Ltd, Cranfield, UK.

    Zey, W. (1999) Putzmeister high-density solids pumps: design and application. 54 pages.

    Published by Putzmeister AG, Germany.