Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only
HWO Master Plan Update
Policy Advisory Committee (PAC)
Briefing #1
September 22, 2016
1
PAC Committee
Internal
Stakeholders
Provides:
• Input on macro-level policy
issues
• Comments relative to the
near-term and long-term
aviation goals of Broward
County
• Guidance
• Community and
Regulatory Perspectives
2Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only
3
Briefing Agenda
Background
Master Planning Team
Study Overview
Master Planning Process and Schedule
Airport Baseline Conditions
Internal Visioning Charrette – Key Themes
Aviation Activity Forecasts
Next Steps
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only
4
Background
October 2014 – County Commission Board approved RFP No. R1277707P1
for Airport Master Plan Update Consultant Services
January 2015 – Final Evaluations and Rankings Completed
March 2015 – County Commission Board Approved Ranking and Negotiations Commenced
October 2015 – County Commission Board Approves Agreement with
Ricondo & Associates, Inc. for Airport Master Plan Update Consultant Services
November 2015 – Notice to Proceed Issued
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only
Master Planning Team
5Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only
6
Study Overview
C O M P L E T E D 2010
2009 C O M P L E T E D
Changes in the overall aviation market
and the global economy warrant master
plan updates.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
and the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) will partly fund
the master plans.
Two sequential phases were identified to
correlate with federal and state funding.
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only
Long-term Airport Plan proposed by 2009 Master Plan
7Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only
HWO Master Planning Process
PHASE 1 (within 12 months) PHASE 2 (within 24 months)
Stakeholder engagement throughout the Study to occur through Master Plan Committee Meetings, Stakeholder briefings, and Public meetings
Task in Progress
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only 8
9
Desired Study Outcomes
will produce the following:
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only
Future vision for HWO to assess
its future role within the regional
air transportation system
A comprehensive long-term
development plan for HWO
Updated Capital Improvement
Program (CIP)
Electronic Airport Layout Plan
(eALP): Compliant with FAA’s
AGIS (Airport GIS) Standards
Airspace Analysis Tool (iALP)
Airport Baseline Conditions
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only 10
HWO Current Conditions
• Airport Size: 536 Acres
• Designated as a General Aviation Reliever Facility
• Restricted to aircraft of 12,500 pounds or less MTOW
• Four paved runways and affiliated taxiways
• Runway 1L/19R – 3,350 ft. X 100 ft. (Visual)
• Runway 1R/19L – 3,260 ft. X 100 ft. (Visual)
• Runway 10L/28R - 3,240 ft. X 100 ft. (Non-precision instrument – 28R)
• Runway 10R/28L – 3,255 ft. X 100 ft. (Non-precision instrument – 10R)
• All runway ends are currently displaced
• Contract Air Traffic Control Tower
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only 11
Overview of the Airport and HWO’s Role Today
SOURCES: Kimley-Horn & Associates,
Inc.,Draft HWO Activity Forecasts, April,
2016; Airnav CY 2015 Based Aircraft
Data.
12Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only
HWO Existing Conditions
13Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only
Internal Visioning Charrette – March 2016
Key Themes
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only 14
General Themes for the Airport
• Position HWO as a “Community” airport.
• Surplus land at HWO creates opportunities to diversify the revenue base through non-aeronautical development.
• Current infrastructure limitations (runway length, pavement limitations, and airspace constraints) and community sensitivities (noise) will continue to limit ability to enhance the role of HWO.
• Opportunities to explore: revenue generating development that is community friendly; light manufacturing; other development that yield benefits for the community.
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only 15
Airport Activity Forecasts
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only 16
Historic Based Aircraft
325 328 325
257
228
247
247 252 253 258 258
325 302 302
302 325 325
351
322 345
349 353
245
276 306
337
367 398
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
FAA TAF FDOT Actual BCAD Count
1.67% CAGR
0.88% CAGR
10.19% CAGR
5 Yr. Growth
Most current and accurate
count for forecast base year
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only 17
398
505
510
542
515
454
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
20
28
20
29
20
30
20
31
20
32
20
33
20
34
20
35
Historic Population Employment Income
FL Market Share US Market Share FAA Comparison
Socioeconomic and
market share forecasts
continue historic trend but
do not acknowledge local
limitations.
FAA Comparison
recommend as
Preferred based
aircraft forecast
Ba
se
d A
ircra
ft
Based Aircraft Forecast Comparison
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only 18
Historic Operat ions
Total Annual Operations
His
tori
c R
an
ge
250000
200000
150000
100000
21
38
49
11
94
58
20
32
45
13
57
04
18
21
90
12
03
22
17
1,5
50
Forecast Base Year
50000
0
Source: FAA ATADS which is consistent with ATC Tower Counts
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only 19
Operations Forecast Comparison
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
220,000
240,000
Historic Population Employment Income
FL Market Share US Market Share Ops Per Based Aircraft
Ops per Base
Aircraft recommend
as Preferred
operations forecast
183,878
233,595 219,711 217,707
195,487
An
nu
al O
pe
rati
on
s
Socioeconomic and market share forecasts do not draw strong correlations.
OPBA pairs current activity levels with based aircraft forecast.
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only 20
21
Next S teps
Submit Forecasts to the FAA for Review and Approval
Begin Capacity Analysis and Identification of Future Needs
Preliminary Draft – For Discussion and Review Purposes Only
THANK YOU!