HVAC Planning and TCO Analysis - Shasta College evidence/IIIB-037 HVAC... · HVAC Planning and TCO Analysis . The links below represent the evidence of TCO analysis and planning for

HVAC Planning and TCO Analysis

The links below represent the evidence of TCO analysis and planning for HVAC Replacement. Below you can review an analysis presented to the college in 2006, board discussions at their October 2007 meeting, their November 2007 Capital Outlay Committee meeting, and the board action taken at their November 2007 regular Board Meeting. Then, in Dec. ’10, Shasta College received its first rebate check from PGE. Please use the links below to view the actual documents.

Detailed Energy Analysis – April 28, 2006

Extract of Board of Trustees meeting minutes – October 10, 2007

Capital Outlay Committee meeting minutes – November 14, 2007

Board of Trustees meeting minutes – November 14, 2007

PG&E Incentive check – December 13, 2010

Detailed Energy Analysis

for Energy Conservation Opportunities

at

Shasta College Redding, California

DRAFT / COMMENTS

Prepared by:

Trane

Prepared:

4/28/06

ii ©American Standard Inc. 200X, All Rights Reserved. Shasta College – Redding, CA

DRAFT - Savings Figures are Projections Only

DISCLAIMER

This report is a Technical Energy Audit, which serves to investigate possible energy conservation opportunities and is based on the plans available, fieldwork, and interviews of site operating and maintenance personnel. The recommendations are based on an analysis of conditions observed and information gathered at the time of the survey and costs are based on experience with similar projects. Statements concerning energy savings are projections only and actual savings to be realized by the customer are dependent upon many factors, including conservation measures implemented, seasonal weather variations, fuel price, and specific energy use practices of the facility occupants and workers. By this report, Trane makes no guarantee, whether express or by implication, of any savings. Any guarantee will be by contract executed by Owner and Trane. This report, by itself, is not intended, as a basis for the engineering required to adopt any of these recommendations. Its intent is to interest the customer in the potential cost savings of the recommendations. Development of design documents and specifications will be required, conforming to the details of this audit, to successfully implement the ECMs. Disturbance, removal, or replacement of building material, insulation systems, high intensity discharge and fluorescent lamps, lamp ballasts, power factor correction capacitors, starting and running capacitors of motors and potentially other components which may contain asbestos, mercury, or PCBs require handling and disposal in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws and regulations. Reference to specific products or manufacturers is not an endorsement of that product or manufacturer by Trane.

iii ©American Standard Inc. 200X, All Rights Reserved. Shasta College – Redding, CA


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................1 1.1 OBJECTIVE ............................................................................................................................................1 1.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY...................................................................................................1 1.3 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ........................................................................................................4 1.4 MAJOR CUSTOMER OPERATIONAL BENEFITS..............................................................................4 1.5 SUMMARY OF COSTS, SAVINGS, & PAYBACKS ............................................................................4 2. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................7 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF METHODS..............................................................................................................7 2.2 METHOD FOR ESTIMATING SAVINGS.............................................................................................8 3. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURE EVALUATIONS AND RESULTS ....................................9 3.1 ECMS CONSIDERED..................................................................................................................................9

ECM 1 – Install New Central Chilled Water and Hot Water Plant Utilizing Tower Free-Cooling .........................10 ECM 4 – Install Cogeneration System.....................................................................................................................12

4. APPENDICES...........................................................................................................................................13

TRANE

©American Standard Inc. 200X, All Rights Reserved. Shasta College – Redding, CA

DRAFT - Savings Figures are Projections Only 1

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 OBJECTIVE Trane is pleased to provide the following Energy Study Report for Shasta College located in Redding, CA. Trane is an international organization with engineers and construction professionals on staff experienced in analyzing and developing comprehensive energy saving programs. The objective of this study is to verify energy savings estimates presented and developed in the Preliminary Proposal. In addition, other major opportunities are reviewed and presented. This analysis was accomplished by comparing the affected campus buildings in two phases, as described below: 1. Baseline: Describe the existing facilities energy usage profile and calibrate the computer models

representing the major energy usage systems in the facilities with the actual historical natural gas and electric bills.

2. Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs): Identify capital retrofit improvement projects that would result in a significant energy usage reduction. The energy and cost savings calculated for each measure are based upon the baseline model.

1.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY General Shasta College is part of the Shasta – Tehama – Trinity Community College District. The campus houses lecture halls, classrooms, laboratories, offices, shops, dormitories, as well as a library, gymnasium and cafeteria. In additional many low energy-consuming buildings exist as well, such as a variety of agricultural buildings, outbuildings and storage buildings. As the proposed project applies to only the high-energy consuming buildings on campus, and those served off a series of low-capacity chilled water and hot water loops, only a portion of the total campus building area was considered in this study. Total estimated gross floor area considered in this study is 230,000 sqft. Original construction of the facilities started in the mid 1960s with some additions and renovations occurring over the past several decades to accommodate growth and the changing needs of the College. Building Envelope

Buildings on campus are primarily constructed of tilt-up concrete and wood frame construction with lightweight concrete roofs utilizing a waterproof membrane. Windows are primarily single pane with ¼” in thickness integrading high shading coefficients.

TRANE



Lighting Systems Interior lighting systems are predominately T-8 fluorescent fixtures using electronic ballasts. The occupants manually control all fixtures. Gym lights are metal halide, while exterior lighting is primarily HID. Mechanical Systems Mechanical systems are primarily multi-zone units utilizing constant speed fans. Few outside air economizers exist in functioning order. There are four low-capacity hot water / chilled water central plants that feed multiple buildings. All chilled water systems are constant volume utilizing relatively low efficiency pumps and motors. All chillers and boilers are all original and very inefficient by today’s standards and are in need of replacement.

TRANE



UTILITIES Shasta College purchases both electricity and natural gas on the open market. PG&E provides transportation and distribution while Accent Energy provides natural gas commodity and Constellation New Energy provides the electric commodity. The most recent utility information available to our team is presented below. Note however, that this analysis assumes that a long-term gas contract will be entered into with a gas commodity provider of the College’s choice. This analysis has assumed a long-term all-in gas contract rate of $0.73 / Therm, which is an indicative rate from at least one commodity provider.

TRANE



Note that although PG&E transportation and distribution charges include time-of-use demand charges, the commodity purchased from Constellation New Energy does not. Therefore the time-of-use and demand based portions of the utility bill is relatively small compared to other PG&E customers. Energy conservation measures such as Thermal Storage and Demand Limiting Measures are much less affective with a utility rate structure such as this.

1.3 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY The energy conservation measures have been cascaded in the order presented in the previous table to account for interaction between measures. Computer simulation models were created for the ECMs 1 – 3 while spreadsheet modeling was done to determine cogeneration savings (ECM 4).

1.4 MAJOR CUSTOMER OPERATIONAL BENEFITS Implementing the described energy conservation measures has many benefits in addition to reducing facility energy usage and associated cost. In most instances, maintenance costs will also be reduced due to a reduction in equipment operating hours and/or loads imposed on the equipment. Replacing old equipment nearing the end of its useful life will also reduce maintenance costs. New system designs often improve system diagnostics, detecting, and repairing problems before building occupants are aware they even exist. HVAC measures often result in improved space comfort conditions and indoor air quality. Spaces are more pleasant to occupants, which often results in an increase in learning and productivity.

1.5 SUMMARY OF COSTS, SAVINGS, & PAYBACKS The ECMs investigated in this technical analysis are presented in the table below. The economics associated presented, and each is identified as potential candidate for implementation. Detailed analyses of all the recommended ECMs are provided in later sections of this report. ECMs reviewed but not recommended due to excessive cost, lack of energy savings or resulting in reduced comfort conditions:

• Outside Air Economizers: The effectiveness of this ECM has a diminishing return due to the installation of tower-free cooling provided by the new central chilled water and hot water plant (ECM 1). Whenever outside wet-bulb temperatures are low, the tower free-cooling system will provide some (pre-cool) or all of the cooling required on campus.

• Multi-zone VAV Retrofit: This measure is very difficult to install effectively due to the nature of the duct system currently installed. Circulation and mixing of room air will be diminished, causing comfort issues amongst the space. In addition, air-handlers use relatively low HP fans, decreasing the cost-benefit of a variable-air-volume upgrade.

TRANE



• Pool filtration pump VFDs: Placing a variable-speed drive on the pool water filtration pumps can be a very effective measure. During evening / non-occupied hours, the pump is operated at reduced load (50% adj), while maintaining code-compliance on pool cleanliness. This measure was not recommended due to current sizing issues with the pump filtration system.

• Fume hood VFDs: This measure is still being looked at by our team. Although this measure can save considerable energy, the controls and required equipment have an excessive cost associated.

TRANE

6 ©American Standard Inc. 200X, All Rights Reserved. Shasta College – Redding, CA


RECOMMENDED ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES

Measure Description

Electrical Energy Saved

(kWh/Yr.)

Electrical Demand Saved

(kW)

Natural Gas Saved

(Therms/Yr.)

Estimated Annual Energy Cost Saved/Yr.

1 New Central Chilled Water and Hot Water Plant with Free-Cooling

658,067 323 24,538 $128,269

4 Cogeneration 2,877,660 0 – 365

-224,538

$133,223

Total 3,499,168 305 - 670 -201,374

$261,492

TRANE



2. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

2.1 DESCRIPTION OF METHODS Energy calculations were performed using EnergyPro, a front-end software package utilizing the DOE 2.1E building modeling engine, and by engineering calculations using spreadsheet techniques. The DOE 2.1E energy analysis program is well known in the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) industry. DOE 2.1E consists of multiple inputs that may be broken down into the following categories:

a) Loads Architectural data for the campus was obtained from original and remodel architectural drawings stored by facilities personnel. Lighting, occupant and miscellaneous electrical loads were estimated based on site surveys. The computer program uses these parameters, along with the latest American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) methodologies to calculate cooling and heating loads for the facility. b) Systems Accurate HVAC system descriptions at the facility were obtained from mechanical plans, as well as site surveys and interviews with facilities personnel. The computer program uses the resulting loads and the system parameters to calculate the cooling and heating load profiles for campus buildings incorporated into the proposed project. c) Plant Equipment & Energy Consumption Accurate information describing the energy consuming equipment in the central plant is input into this portion of the computer model. The program uses the load profiles and system requirements to calculate the energy consumption. d) Energy Economics In this final section, current electric and gas rate structures are defined in the computer model. The program uses this information to apply cost to the energy consumption calculated in sections b and c. The model is then adjusted until the following criteria are met:

i. Calculated plant and system loads closely match the actual installed capacity. ii. Calculated energy consumption reasonably matches the actual energy consumption

determined from the utility bills. As the campus utilizes a single campus electric and gas meter, engineering judgment was used to ensure a reasonable model.

TRANE



Energy conservation measures that can not be analyzed with the EnergyPro software are evaluated using an alternative spreadsheet method.

2.2 METHOD FOR ESTIMATING SAVINGS The energy consumption calculated from EnergyPro uses the appropriate electric and gas rates to calculate the operating cost of the building. This operating cost is then compared to the actual cost obtained from the utility bills. The resulting model is then used as the base model from which all energy and cost savings are computed. This report sequentially adds (cascades) the recommended ECM's to the base model to show ECM interaction. The facility’s existing envelope, internal conditions, schedules, and energy-using systems were input into the EnergyPro program. Model inputs, applicable to the measures analyzed, are presented in the appendix of this document. For measures evaluated external to the EnergyPro program, the current electric and natural gas utility rates were applied to the energy savings determined to arrive at a net cost impact.

TRANE



3. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURE EVALUATIONS AND RESULTS

3.1 ECMs Considered

1. Install New Central Chilled Water and Hot Water Plant Utilizing Tower Free-Cooling 2. Install Outdoor Air Economizers on Air-Handlers 3. Upgrade Constant Volume Multi-Zone Units to Variable-Air-Volume Units 4. Install Cogeneration System

TRANE



ECM 1 – Install New Central Chilled Water and Hot Water Plant Utilizing Tower Free-Cooling

Project Description Current Situation: Shasta College currently utilizes four (4) low-capacity central chilled water / hot water plants to serve many buildings, as well as a separate chiller to serve the 2200 Building. Each of these plants is original and in need of replacement, as well as being very inefficient by today’s standards. The plants are old technology, utilizing reciprocating compressors, constant volume pumps, old cooling towers and outdated boilers. All of this leads to increased utility costs, greater maintenance and discomfort during equipment breakdown. See below for additional plant details.

Proposed Retrofit: Trane proposes to install a new central chilled water and hot water plant utilizing tower free-cooling. Trane will utilize the Building 1400 mechanical room for the new chiller plant. This plant is to provide a total of 800-tons of cooling, utilizing two (2) high-efficiency centrifugal chillers with a full-load efficiency estimated at 0.47 kW/ton and an NPLV of 0.34 kW/ton. These chillers are capable of providing variable-primary flow and use variable frequency drives on their compressors for improved part-load efficiency. The pumping systems will also be high-efficiency and utilize variable flow technology to further improve part-load conditions. This 800-ton plant is oversized to handle growing campus loads as well as the future Library Annex. A new boiler plant will be placed in the Building 800 mechanical room. It will consist of five (5) high-efficiency Hydrotherm KN series modulating boilers achieving efficiencies of 88% at most part load conditions. The control protocol calls for each boiler to operate at its minimum part-load condition, increasing the load uniformly among the boilers as the heating load increases. To further improve efficiency, the central plant will utilize tower-free cooling to pre-cool the chilled water prior to entering the chiller when outdoor conditions allow. This system utilizes a plate-and-frame heat exchanger and can provide up to 100% of the cooling load at real-time conditions when outdoor wet-bulb temperatures are sufficient. New distribution pipe will be placed in the ground between the new central plant and each of the existing sub-loops. The new pipe will be insulated to minimize heat-loss (or gain) to the ground.

TRANE



Tie-in to the existing loops will occur by one of two-ways, depending on final design. The preferred method will be to direct connect the new primary chilled water lines to each of the sub-loops directly. All three-way valves located at the existing air-handlers would be converted to two-way valves. When cooling is not required at the air-handler, the two-way valve would close, and the main chilled-water pump would slow down, conserving energy and cost, to maintain a constant pressure within the loop. If final design determines that one or more of the sub-loops has unusually high head requirements, a booster pump would be installed for that particular loop such that the primary pump does not need to be unnecessarily oversized.

TRANE



ECM 4 – Install Cogeneration System

Project Description Current Situation: Shasta College currently utilizes no cogeneration equipment. Cogeneration is the process of producing electricity locally and utilizing the waste heat occurring in the exhaust and engine jacket to provide hot water for building heating, pool heating and domestic water purposes and chilled water for cooling through absorption chilling. Proposed Retrofit Strategy: Trane proposes to install a 375-kW reciprocating-type cogeneration system utilizing a plate-and-frame heat-exchanger to harvest the waste-heat as well as a 108-Ton absorption chiller. Hot water and chilled water will be harvested and distributed through the campus’s new district heating and cooling lines. This cogeneration system will be placed inside the Building 2000 mechanical room and require a cooling tower be placed on the roof. Trane has selected this size cogeneration system as it is best suited to meet the campus’s electrical base-load. An electrically base-loaded cogeneration system receives a great return on investment, as it is allowed to operate near full capacity most of the time. See the following table showing the campus’s electrical load profile.

Electrical Demand FrequencyShasta College Campus

0.0

200.0

400.0

600.0

800.0

1000.0

1200.0

1400.0

1600.0

1800.0

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Annual Frequency (%)

Dem

and

(kW

)

kW

Generator Ouput

TRANE



4. APPENDICES

TRANE

©American Standard Inc. 200X, All Rights Reserved. Shasta College – Redding, CA DRAFT - Savings Figures are Projections Only

4.1 BUILDING / PLANT INFORMATION

Shasta College Equipment Summary.xls Building areas and rates 5/1/2006 5:17 PM

Energy Analysis Buildings AreasBuilding Name Area

# Sq. Ft.100 Administration 21104200 Library 40914400 Humanities 3408500 Theater 23136600 Music 12640800 Social Science 20132900 Office Building 55061100 Math/ Engineering 116601300 Electronic/ Police 88261400 Physical Science 193161600 Life Science 193162000 Campus Center 329682200 Bussiness Education 13183Total Energy Analisys 232109

Utility rates Electricity GasExistent System(OLD SYSTEM) $ 0.1362 / kWh $ 1.0453 / ThermPost Retrofit(NEW SYSTEM) $ 0.1362 / kWh $ 0.736 / Therm

Shasta College Equipment Summary.xls Pumps and fans motors 5/1/2006 5:16 PM

MOTOR HORSE POWER PLANT Name Pump (HP) Pump (BHP)

#500 Boiler Pump 5 3.75

Chilled Water Pump 7.5 5.625Cooling Tower Pump 5 3.75Cooling Tower Fan 15 11.25

800 Boiler Pump 10 7.5Chilled Water Pump 20 15Cooling Tower Pump 7.5 5.625Cooling Tower Fan 20 15

1400 Boiler Pump 15 11.25Chilled Water Pump 20 15Cooling Tower Pump 25 18.75Cooling Tower Fan 15 11.25

2000 Boiler Pump 5 3.75Chilled Water Pump 5 3.75Cooling Tower Pump 5 3.75Cooling Tower Fan 7.5 5.625

2200 Boiler Pump 3 2.25Chilled Water Pump 5 3.75Cooling Tower Pump 5 3.75Cooling Tower Fan 10 7.5

Total 211 158

PLANT Name Pump (HP) Pump (BHP)#

NEW PLANT Boiler Pump 30 22.5Chilled Water Pump 75 56.25Cooling Tower Pump 40 30Cooling Tower Fan 40 30

Total 185 108.75

Shasta College Equipment Summary.xls NEW PLANT 4/24/2006 10:30 AM

PLANT CHILLER CWP BOILER INPUT OUTPUT HWP CT CTP CTF# MODEL QT TON GPM HP MODEL MBTU/H MBTU/H GPM HP TON GPM HP HP

NEW CVHE 2 400 1800 3 X 25HP KN-20 1999 1760 600 2 x 15 1000 2400 2 X20 2 X20AT-212-124

Notes:1. The new plant provides CWS and HWS to the buildings presented in the old system (A and B models)

Shasta College Equipment Summary.xls PLANT 500 4/24/2006 10:31 AM

PLANT CHILLER CWP BOILER INPUT OUTPUT HWP CT CTP CTF# MODEL TON GPM HP MODEL MBTU/H MBTU/H GPM HP TON GPM HP HP

500 CG139B 139 325 7.5 M-205 FG 2563 2050 190 5 150 300 5 15 (2 SPEED)VXT-120

Building Multizone COOLING SUPPLY RETURN# ID CFM SENS. TOTAL FAN (HP) FAN (HP)

400 MZ1 4850 104760 125712 51x MZ 4850 104760 125712 4 BHP


500 MZ1 17000 367200 440640 5 5MZ2 6000 129600 155520 5 0

average MZ 11500 248400 298080 5 2.52x MZ 11500 248400 298080 4 2 BHP


600 MZ1 12100 261360 313632 10MZ2 6000 129600 155520 5

average MZ 9050 195480 234576 7.52x MZ 9050 195480 234576 6 BHP


PLANT CHILLER 2 CWP BOILER INPUT OUTPUT HWP CT CTP CTF# MODEL TON GPM HP MODEL MBTU/H MBTU/H GPM HP TON GPM HP HP

800 CG100B 200 480 20 M-335 FG 4181 3350 400 10 210 480 7.5 20VTX-166


200 MZ1 20000 432000 518400 15 7.5MZ2 8100 174960 209952 7.5 0MZ3 20775 448740 538488 15 10

average MZ 16292 351900 422280 12.5 5.83x MZ 16292 351900 422280 10 4.7 BHP


800 MZ1 8000 172800 207360 7.5MZ2 16550 357480 428976 10

average MZ 12275 265140 318168 8.752x MZ 12275 265140 318168 7 BHP


900 MZ1 3200 69120 82944 5MZ2 3200 69120 82944 5

average MZ 3200 69120 82944 52x MZ 3200 69120 82944 4 BHP



2200 CG112B 112 264 5 M-175 FG 2188 1730 176 3 125 240 5 10VTX-95-CR

Building Multizone COOLING SUPPLY RETURN Building Multizone COOLING SUPPLY RETURN# ID CFM SENS. TOTAL FAN (HP) FAN (HP) # ID CFM SENS. TOTAL FAN (HP) FAN (HP)

2200 MZ1 14050 303480 364176 10 100 MZ1 12550 271080 325296 10 7.5Z-1 1800 38880 46656 7.5 BHP Z-1 1800 38880 46656Z-2 1850 39960 47952 Z-2 2000 43200 51840Z-3 2200 47520 57024 Z-3 1950 42120 50544Z-4 1850 39960 47952 Z-4 1600 34560 41472Z-5 1850 39960 47952 Z-5 1900 41040 49248Z-6 2100 45360 54432 Z-6 1650 35640 42768Z-7 2400 51840 62208 Z-7 1650 35640 42768

1 X MZ 14050 303480 364176 7.5 BHPBuilding Multizone COOLING SUPPLY RETURN

# ID CFM SENS. TOTAL FAN (HP) FAN (HP)100 MZ2 10925 235980 283176 10 7.5

Z-8 2100 45360 54432Z-9 1125 24300 29160

Z-10 1825 39420 47304Z-11 1550 33480 40176Z-12 1600 34560 41472Z-13 1650 35640 42768Z-14 1075 23220 27864

Average2 x MZ 11738 253530 304236 7.5 5.6 BHP


PLANT CHILLER 2 CWP BOILER INPUT OUTPUT HWP CT CTP CTF# MODEL TON GPM HP MODEL MBTU/H MBTU/H GPM HP TON GPM HP HP

1400 CG125B 250 600 20 N/A-430 6000 4300 435 15 275 720 25 15T-1442


1100 MZ 11400 246240 295488 8 BHP


1300 MZ 10800 233280 279936 8 BHP


1400 MZ1 9850 212760 255312 7.5MZ2 3400 73440 88128 3MZ3 13155 284148 340978 10EF-1EF-2

3 x MZ 8802 190116 228139 6.835.47 BHP


1600 MZ1 10700 231120 277344 10MZ2 10600 228960 274752 7.5MZ3 3000 64800 77760 3EF-1EF-2

3 x MZ 8100 174960 209952 75.47 BHP



2000 CG125B 125 300 5 M-335 FG 4181 3350 300 5 150 300 5 7.5VTX-120-CR


2000 MZS1 0 0 0 3MZS2 0 0 0 5MZS3 0 0 0 5MZS4 0 0 0 7.5MZS5 0 0 0 15

average MZ 8000 172800 207360 7.15 x MZ 8000 172800 207360 5.68 bhp

TRANE

©American Standard Inc. 200X, All Rights Reserved. Shasta College – Redding, CA DRAFT - Savings Figures are Projections Only

4.2 ENERGYPRO INPUT/OUTPUT REPORTS

Job Number:

TITLE 24 REPORT

Project Designer:

Report Prepared By:

Job Number:

Date:

Title 24 Report for:

The EnergyPro computer program has been used to perform the calculations summarized in this compliance report. This program has approval and isauthorized by the California Energy Commission for use with both the Residential and Nonresidential 2005 Building Energy Efficiency Standards.

This program developed by EnergySoft, LLC - www.energysoft.com.

06015EnergyPro 4.0 by EnergySoft User Number: 2291

Shasta College Central Plant OPTION 011555 Old Oregon TrailREDDING , CA 96049

,

E. CorderoCOSTA ENGINEERS, INC

3274 VILLA LANENAPA, CA 94558(707) 252-9177

06015

5/1/2006

PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Part 1 of 3 PERF-1PROJECT NAME

PROJECT ADDRESS

PRINCIPAL DESIGNER - ENVELOPE TELEPHONE Building Permit #

Checked by/DateEnforcement Agency Use

DATE

Job Number:

GENERAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEThis Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 of the

1. I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code tosign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am licensed in the State ofCalifornia as a civil engineer, mechanical engineer, or I am a licensed architect.

2. I affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code Section5537.2 or 6737.3 to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensedcontractor performing this work.

3. I affirm that I am eligible under Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this documentbecause it pertains to a structure or type of work described as exempt pusuant to Business and ProfessionsCode Sections 5537, 5538, and 6737.1. (These sections of the Business and Professions Code are printed infull in the Nonresidential Manual.)

PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER - NAME SIGNATURE LIC. NO. DATE

DATE OF PLANS BUILDING CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA CLIMATE ZONE

BUILDING TYPE NONRESIDENTIAL HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL

ADDITION ALTERATIONNEW CONSTRUCTIONPHASE OF CONSTRUCTION

HOTEL/MOTEL GUEST ROOM

EXISTING + ADDITION

Sq.Ft.

Page:

The Principal Designer hereby certifys that the proposed building design represented in this set of construction documents isconsistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with thispermit application. The proposed building as designed meets the energy efficiency requirements contained in sections 110, 116,through 118, and 140, 142, 143 or 149 of Title 24, Part 6.

SIGNATURE DATEDOCUMENTATION AUTHOR

DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR TELEPHONE

ENV. MECH.LTG.

ENVELOPE COMPLIANCEIndicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures

Required Forms

PRINCIPAL LIGHTING DESIGNER - NAME SIGNATURE LIC. NO. DATE

LIGHTING COMPLIANCEIndicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures

Required Forms

PRINCIPAL MECHANICAL DESIGNER - NAME SIGNATURE LIC. NO. DATE

Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures

Required Forms

MECHANICAL COMPLIANCE

California Code of Regulations. This certificate applies only to a Building using the performance compliance approach.The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete.

06015

Shasta College Central Plant OPTION 0

11555 Old Oregon Trail REDDING

5/1/2006

EnergyPro 4.0 by EnergySoft User Number: 2291

232,109 11X

2 of 138

E. Cordero

COSTA ENGINEERS, INC (707) 252-9177

Costa Engineers, Inc

ENV-1

MECH-1, MECH-2, MECH-3

Run Initiation Time: 05/01/06 16:55:49 Run Code: 1146527749

Lighting Compliance Not In The Scope OfThis Submittal

Nov 65

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number:

ANNUAL TDV ENERGY USE SUMMARY (kBtu/sqft-yr)

Page:

ENERGY COMPONENTStandardDesign

ProposedDesign

ComplianceMargin

Space HeatingSpace CoolingIndoor FansHeat RejectionPumps & Misc.Domestic Hot WaterLightingReceptacleProcess

TOTALS:

GENERAL INFORMATION

Building OrientationNumber of Stories

Number of Zones

Orientation Gross Area Glazing Area

Standard Proposed

Front ElevationLeft ElevationRear ElevationRight Elevation

Roof

Lighting Power DensityPrescriptive Env. Heat LossPrescriptive Env. Heat Gain

PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Part 2 of 3

Number of Systems

Conditioned Floor Area

Conditioned Footprint Area

Unconditioned Floor Areasqft.

sqft.

sqft.

sqft.

sqft.

sqft.

sqft.

sqft.

sqft.

sqft.

sqft.

sqft.

sqft.

W/sqft. W/sqft.

Total

sqft. sqft.

Glazing Ratio

PERF-1

Remarks:

Percent better than Standard: excluding process)(

Btu/h Btu/h

Btu/h-F Btu/h-F

Fuel Type

06015

Shasta College Central Plant OPTION 0 5/1/2006

EnergyPro 4.0 by EnergySoft User Number: 2291 3 of 138Run Initiation Time: 05/01/06 16:55:49 Run Code: 1146527749

41.76 35.51 6.25

77.56 68.21 9.36

81.56 82.24 -0.69

27.12 14.36 12.76

11.28 8.16 3.12

18.24 18.24 0.00

70.94 70.94 0.00

56.20 56.20 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

384.66 353.86 30.80

BUILDING COMPLIES

(North) 0 deg

1

28

(North)

(East)

(South)

(West)

22,421 3,197

23,538

25,282

20,776

92,017

3,836

4,245

3,739

15,017

1.218

67,495

3,979,174

35,465

0.000

3,494,554

221,009

0

232,109

13

221,009 0

14.3%

16.3%

16.8%

18.0%

16.3%

0.0%

Air Handlers:- Constant Volume - non Economizer

8.0%8.0%

Natural Gas

Standard Proposed

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80kBtu/sqft-yr

Space Heating

Space Cooling

Indoor Fans

Heat Rejection

Pumps & Misc

DHW

Lighting

Receptacle

Process

PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Part 3 of 3 PERF-1PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:

ZONE INFORMATION

System Name

FloorArea(sqft.)

Area(W/sf)

Inst.LPD

(W/sf)Tailored

(W/sf)

Proc.Loads(W/sf)

Ctrl.Credits(W/sf)

The local enforcement agency should pay special attention to the items specified in this checklist. These items require special written justificationand documentation, and special verification to be used with the performance approach. The local enforcement agency determines the adequacy ofthe justification, and may reject a building or design that otherwise complies based on the adequacy of the special justification and documentationsubmitted.

The exceptional features listed in this performance approach application have specifically been reviewed. Adequate written justification anddocumentation for their use have been provided by the applicant.

Authorized Signature or Stamp ________________________________________

EXCEPTIONAL CONDITIONS COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST

Zone Name Occupancy Type

Allowed LPD

4

Notes: 2. See LTG-4-C Items above require special documentation1. See LTG-2-C (items marked with asterisk, see LTG-2 -C by others)

31

3. See LTG-5-C(by others)

2

4. See LTG-6-C

06015



21,104100 0.000B100 Administration Comp Bldg School

A Premium Eff 18.75 BHP Chilled Water Pump Motor has been specified.

13,1832200 0.000B2200 Bussiness Comp Bldg School

32,9682000 0.000B2000 Campus Center Comp Bldg School

11,6601100 0.000B1100 Math & Eng Comp Bldg School

8,8261300 0.000B1300 Electronics Comp Bldg School

19,3161400 0.000B1400 Phys. Science Comp Bldg School

19,3161600 0.000B1600 Life Sience Comp Bldg School

40,914200 0.000B200 Library Library, Reading Area

20,132800 0.000B800 Social Science Comp Bldg School

5,506900 0.000B900 Offices Comp Bldg Office

3,408400 0.000B400 Humanities Comp Bldg School

23,136500 0.000B500 Theater Theater, Performance

12,640600 0.000B600 Music Comp Bldg School

The Chilled Water Pump includes a Variable Speed Drive.

A Premium Eff 11.25 BHP Hot Water Pump Motor has been specified.

The Hot Water Pump includes a Variable Speed Drive.

The Cooling Tower "AT-212-324" includes a Variable Speed Drive on the fan motor.

The Cooling Tower "AT-212-324" has an Approach Temperature of 10 degrees F.

The Cooling Tower "AT-212-324: Premium Eff" 31.00 BHP Fan Motor has been specified.

A Premium Eff 30.00 BHP Condenser Water Pump Motor has been specified.

The Zone "B100 Administration" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 418 ft.

The Zone "B100 Administration" has a West Display Perimeter Credit of 140 ft.

The Zone "B2000 Campus Center" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 479 ft.

The Zone "B2000 Campus Center" has a West Display Perimeter Credit of 203 ft.

The Zone "B1100 Math & Eng" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 344 ft.


Job Number: Page:

ZONE INFORMATION

System Name

FloorArea(sqft.)

Area(W/sf)

Inst.LPD

(W/sf)Tailored

(W/sf)

Proc.Loads(W/sf)

Ctrl.Credits(W/sf)






Allowed LPD

4


31


2

4. See LTG-6-C

06015



The Zone "B1100 Math & Eng" has a West Display Perimeter Credit of 68 ft.

The Zone "B1300 Electronics" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 309 ft.

The Zone "B1300 Electronics" has a West Display Perimeter Credit of 57 ft.

The Zone "B1400 Phys. Science" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 389 ft.

The Zone "B1400 Phys. Science" has a West Display Perimeter Credit of 181 ft.

The Zone "B1600 Life Sience" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 417 ft.

The Zone "B1600 Life Sience" has a West Display Perimeter Credit of 168 ft.

The Zone "B200 Library" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 525 ft.

The Zone "B200 Library" has a West Display Perimeter Credit of 173 ft.

The Zone "B800 Social Science" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 544 ft.

The Zone "B800 Social Science" has a West Display Perimeter Credit of 78 ft.

The Zone "B900 Offices" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 206 ft.

The Zone "B900 Offices" has a West Display Perimeter Credit of 149 ft.


Job Number: Page:

ZONE INFORMATION

System Name

FloorArea(sqft.)

Area(W/sf)

Inst.LPD

(W/sf)Tailored

(W/sf)

Proc.Loads(W/sf)

Ctrl.Credits(W/sf)






Allowed LPD

4


31


2

4. See LTG-6-C

06015



The Zone "B400 Humanities" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 213 ft.

The Zone "B400 Humanities" has a West Display Perimeter Credit of 80 ft.

The Zone "B500 Theater" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 70 ft.

The Zone "B500 Theater" has a West Display Perimeter Credit of 111 ft.

The Zone "B600 Music" has a North/East/South Display Perimeter Credit of 356 ft.

Job Number: Page:

PROJECT NAME DATE

SurfaceType

Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Tilt

Joint AppendixIV Reference

Location / Comments

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ENV-1-C

OPAQUE SURFACES

FENESTRATION SURFACES

Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Type

#

WindowHgt. Wd.

OverhangLen. Hgt. LExt.RExt. Dist. Len. Hgt.

Left FinDist. Len. Hgt.

Right Fin

SHGC

Location/Comments

EXTERIOR SHADING

InsulationCav. Cont.

Exterior Shade Type SHGC#

More than or equal to 10,000 sq.ft. of site-built fenestration area must include a label certificate either issued by NFRC or provide a CEC Default Label Certificate using the default U-factorsfrom Standards Table 116-A and B. Certificate shall be filed in the contractor's project office during construction and in the building manager's office after construction

Cond.Status

Cond.Stat.

The proposed building contains an enclosed space with floor area greater than 25,000 sq.ft, a ceiling height greater than 15 feet and a LPD for general lighting of at least0.5 W/sq.ft. If this box is checked, ENV-4-C must be filled out when submitting under the Prescriptive Compliance Approach.

(1) U-factor Type: 116-A Default Table from Standards, Table NI-1 Default Table from the ACM Manual Appendix, NFRC Labeled value.(2) SHGC Type: 116-B Default Table from Standards, COG Center of Glass, NFRC Labeled Value

MINIMUM SKYLIGHT AREA FOR LARGE ENCLOSED SPACES

Glazing Type# 1 2

*

* N, E, A, R (New, Existing, Altered, Removed)

06015EnergyPro 4.0 by EnergySoft User Number: 2291 7 of 138



1 Roof 21,104 0.048 0 0R-19234

WallWallWall

567891011121314151617181920

WallRoofWallDoorWallWallWallRoofWallWallWallWallRoofWallWallWall

R-9.3R-9.3R-9.3R-9.3R-19R-9.3NoneR-9.3R-9.3R-9.3R-19R-9.3R-9.3R-9.3R-9.3R-19R-9.3R-9.3R-9.3

2,4111,9751,5631,641

13,1831,389

241,281

699635

32,9681,4241,3243,1533,018

11,6961,3221,212

862

0.0720.0720.0720.0720.0480.0720.7000.0720.0720.0720.0480.0720.0720.0720.0720.0480.0720.0720.072

018027090000

1802709000

1802709000

180270

90909090090909090900909090900909090

01-A14 B100 Administration14-B214-B214-B2

B100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 Administration

14-B201-A1414-B228-A214-B214-B214-B201-A1414-B214-B214-B214-B201-A1414-B214-B214-B2

B100 AdministrationB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB1100 Math & EngB1100 Math & EngB1100 Math & EngB1100 Math & Eng

12345678910111213

Window 104 1.280 116-AWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindow

104104104104104265265265265787878

1.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.280

116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A

0.80 116-B 00.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.80

116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B

00000

180180180180270270270

ExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExisting

1 None 0.76 4.0 7.0 10.0 0.1 10.0 10.0NoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone

2345678910111213

0.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.76

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0

7.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

X

Existing Single Metal Clear B100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 Administration

Single Metal ClearSingle Metal ClearSingle Metal ClearSingle Metal ClearSingle Metal ClearSingle Metal ClearSingle Metal ClearSingle Metal ClearSingle Metal ClearSingle Metal ClearSingle Metal ClearSingle Metal Clear

ExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExisting

R-0.0R-6.0R-6.0R-6.0R-6.0R-0.0R-6.0R-0.0R-6.0R-6.0R-6.0R-0.0R-6.0R-6.0R-6.0R-6.0R-0.0R-6.0R-6.0R-6.0

Front (North)FrontFrontFrontFront

(North) (North) (North) (North)

FrontRearRearRearRearRightRightRight

(North) (South) (South) (South) (South) (West) (West) (West)

Job Number: Page:

PROJECT NAME DATE

SurfaceType

Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Tilt


Location / Comments


OPAQUE SURFACES


Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Type

#

WindowHgt. Wd.



Right Fin

SHGC

Location/Comments

EXTERIOR SHADING




Cond.Status

Cond.Stat.




Glazing Type# 1 2

*





21 Wall 862 0.072 90 90R-9.3222324

RoofWallDoor

25262728293031323334353637383940

WallWallWallRoofWallDoorWallDoorWallDoorDoorWallDoorRoofWallDoor

R-19R-9.3NoneR-9.3R-9.3R-9.3R-19R-9.3NoneR-9.3NoneR-9.3NoneNoneR-9.3NoneR-19R-9.3None

8,8261,186

501,191

933933

19,3161,825

271,737

251,754

8574

1,70750

19,3161,603

35

0.0480.0720.7000.0720.0720.0720.0480.0720.7000.0720.7000.0720.7000.7000.0720.7000.0480.0720.700

000

18027090000

1801802702702709090000

09090909090090909090909090909009090

14-B2 B1100 Math & Eng01-A1414-B228-A2

B1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1300 Electronics

14-B214-B214-B201-A1414-B228-A214-B228-A214-B228-A228-A214-B228-A201-A1414-B228-A2

B1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1600 Life SienceB1600 Life SienceB1600 Life Sience

16171819202122232425262728


781367878787878787878

13636

1.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.280

116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A

0.80 116-B 2700.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.80

116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B

27027027090909090909090900



171819202122232425262728

0.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.76

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0

7.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

X

Existing Single Metal Clear B100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB100 AdministrationB2200 Bussiness




Right (West)RightRightRightLeft

(West) (West) (West) (East)

LeftLeftLeftLeftLeftLeftLeftFront

(East) (East) (East) (East) (East) (East) (East) (North)

Job Number: Page:

PROJECT NAME DATE

SurfaceType

Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Tilt


Location / Comments


OPAQUE SURFACES


Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Type

#

WindowHgt. Wd.



Right Fin

SHGC

Location/Comments

EXTERIOR SHADING




Cond.Status

Cond.Stat.




Glazing Type# 1 2

*





41 Door 35 0.700 0 90None424344

WallDoorWall

45464748495051525354555657585960

DoorWallDoorRoofWallWallWallWallRoofWallDoorDoorDoorDoorDoorDoor

R-9.3NoneR-9.3NoneR-9.3NoneR-19R-9.3R-9.3R-9.3R-9.3R-19R-9.3NoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone

1,63335

1,65240

1,525115

40,9142,3253,2992,2472,224

20,1322,345

404040404040

0.0720.7000.0720.7000.0720.7000.0510.0720.0720.0720.0720.0480.0720.7000.7000.7000.7000.7000.700

180180270270909000

1802709000000000

909090909090090909090090909090909090

28-A2 B1600 Life Sience14-B228-A214-B2

B1600 Life SienceB1600 Life SienceB1600 Life Sience

28-A214-B228-A202-A514-B214-B214-B214-B201-A1414-B228-A228-A228-A228-A228-A228-A2

B1600 Life SienceB1600 Life SienceB1600 Life SienceB200 LibraryB200 LibraryB200 LibraryB200 LibraryB200 LibraryB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social Science

31323334353637383940414243


3636368484727272

1151159898

1.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.280

116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A

0.80 116-B 00.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.80

116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B

000

1801801801801802702709090



323334353637383940414243

0.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.76

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0

7.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

X

Existing Single Metal Clear B2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 BussinessB2200 Bussiness




Front (North)FrontFrontFrontRear

(North) (North) (North) (South)

RearRearRearRearRightRightLeftLeft

(South) (South) (South) (South) (West) (West) (East) (East)

Job Number: Page:

PROJECT NAME DATE

SurfaceType

Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Tilt


Location / Comments


OPAQUE SURFACES


Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Type

#

WindowHgt. Wd.



Right Fin

SHGC

Location/Comments

EXTERIOR SHADING




Cond.Status

Cond.Stat.




Glazing Type# 1 2

*





61 Wall 2,136 0.072 180 90R-9.3626364

WallDoorWall

65666768697071727374757677787980

RoofWallDoorWallDoorWallWallDoorDoorWallDoorRoofWallDoorWallWall

R-9.3NoneR-9.3R-19R-9.3NoneR-9.3NoneR-9.3R-9.3NoneNoneR-9.3NoneR-19R-9.3NoneR-9.3R-9.3

1,31835

1,1805,506

27820

27820

1,8122,004

2020

1,41341

3,4081,224

200286

1,110

0.0720.7000.0720.0480.0720.7000.0720.7000.0720.0720.7000.7000.0720.7000.0480.0720.7000.0720.072

27027090000

1801802709090909090000

180180

909090090909090909090909090090909090

14-B2 B800 Social Science14-B228-A214-B2

B800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social Science

01-A1414-B228-A214-B228-A214-B214-B228-A228-A214-B228-A201-A1414-B228-A214-B214-B2

B900 OfficesB900 OfficesB900 OfficesB900 OfficesB900 OfficesB900 OfficesB900 OfficesB900 OfficesB900 OfficesB400 HumanitiesB400 HumanitiesB400 HumanitiesB400 HumanitiesB400 HumanitiesB400 HumanitiesB500 Theater

46474849505152535455565758


1005050

10020010010010010013510050

1.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.280

116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A

0.80 116-B 00.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.80

116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B

18018018027027027090909090900



474849505152535455565758

0.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.76

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0

7.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

X

Existing Single Metal Clear B2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB2000 Campus CenterB1100 Math & Eng




Front (North)RearRearRearRight

(South) (South) (South) (West)

RightRightLeftLeftLeftLeftLeftFront

(West) (West) (East) (East) (East) (East) (East) (North)

Job Number: Page:

PROJECT NAME DATE

SurfaceType

Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Tilt


Location / Comments


OPAQUE SURFACES


Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Type

#

WindowHgt. Wd.



Right Fin

SHGC

Location/Comments

EXTERIOR SHADING




Cond.Status

Cond.Stat.




Glazing Type# 1 2

*





81 Roof 12,000 0.051 0 0R-19828384

WallWallWall

85868788899091

RoofWallDoorWallDoorWallDoor

R-9.3R-9.3R-9.3R-19R-9.3NoneR-9.3NoneR-9.3None

1,834810860

12,6401,173

881,620

411,413

41

0.0720.0720.0720.0480.0720.7000.0720.7000.0720.700

18027090000

1801809090

9090900909090909090

02-A5 B500 Theater14-B214-B214-B2

B500 TheaterB500 TheaterB500 Theater

01-A1414-B228-A214-B228-A214-B228-A2

B600 MusicB600 MusicB600 MusicB600 MusicB600 MusicB600 MusicB600 Music

61626364656667686970717273


505050506050818125255025

1.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.280

116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A

0.80 116-B 00.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.80

116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B

180180180180180180270900000

ExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExistingExisting


626364656667686970717273

0.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.76

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0

7.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

X

Existing Single Metal Clear B1100 Math & EngB1100 Math & EngB1100 Math & EngB1100 Math & EngB1100 Math & EngB1100 Math & EngB1100 Math & EngB1100 Math & EngB1100 Math & EngB1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1300 Electronics



R-0.0R-6.0R-6.0R-6.0R-0.0R-6.0R-0.0R-6.0R-0.0R-6.0R-0.0

Front (North)RearRearRearRear

(South) (South) (South) (South)

RearRearRightLeftFrontFrontFrontFront

(South) (South) (West) (East) (North) (North) (North) (North)

Job Number: Page:

PROJECT NAME DATE

SurfaceType

Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Tilt


Location / Comments


OPAQUE SURFACES


Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Type

#

WindowHgt. Wd.



Right Fin

SHGC

Location/Comments

EXTERIOR SHADING




Cond.Status

Cond.Stat.




Glazing Type# 1 2

*





76777879808182838485868788


292929502929292990444444

1.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.280

116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A

0.80 116-B 1800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.80

116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B

1801801801802702709090

180270270270


777879808182838485868788

0.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.76

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0

7.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

X

Existing Single Metal Clear B1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1300 ElectronicsB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. Science



Rear (South)RearRearRearRear

(South) (South) (South) (South)

RightRightLeftLeftRearRightRightRight

(West) (West) (East) (East) (South) (West) (West) (West)

Job Number: Page:

PROJECT NAME DATE

SurfaceType

Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Tilt


Location / Comments


OPAQUE SURFACES


Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Type

#

WindowHgt. Wd.



Right Fin

SHGC

Location/Comments

EXTERIOR SHADING




Cond.Status

Cond.Stat.




Glazing Type# 1 2

*





919293949596979899100101102103


50505097

102609060606060

1,262

1.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.280

116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A

0.80 116-B 900.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.80

116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B

9090900

180270270909090900


9293949596979899100101102103

0.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.76

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0

7.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

X

Existing Single Metal Clear B1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1400 Phys. ScienceB1600 Life SienceB1600 Life SienceB1600 Life SienceB1600 Life SienceB1600 Life SienceB1600 Life SienceB1600 Life SienceB1600 Life SienceB200 Library



Left (East)LeftLeftLeftFront

(East) (East) (East) (North)

RearRightRightLeftLeftLeftLeftFront

(South) (West) (West) (East) (East) (East) (East) (North)

Job Number: Page:

PROJECT NAME DATE

SurfaceType

Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Tilt


Location / Comments


OPAQUE SURFACES


Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Type

#

WindowHgt. Wd.



Right Fin

SHGC

Location/Comments

EXTERIOR SHADING




Cond.Status

Cond.Stat.




Glazing Type# 1 2

*





106107108109110111112113114115116117118

Window 1,320 1.280 116-AWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindowWindow

47878787878735

1041515

126126

1.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.280

116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A

0.80 116-B 900.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.80

116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B

0180180180180180270900

180270270


107108109110111112113114115116117118

0.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.76

4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0

7.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.07.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

X

Existing Single Metal Clear B200 LibraryB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB800 Social ScienceB900 OfficesB900 OfficesB900 OfficesB900 Offices



Left (East)FrontRearRearRear

(North) (South) (South) (South)

RearRearRightLeftFrontRearRightRight

(South) (South) (West) (East) (North) (South) (West) (West)

Job Number: Page:

PROJECT NAME DATE

SurfaceType

Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Tilt


Location / Comments


OPAQUE SURFACES


Area

U-Fac.

Act.Azm.

Type

#

WindowHgt. Wd.



Right Fin

SHGC

Location/Comments

EXTERIOR SHADING




Cond.Status

Cond.Stat.




Glazing Type# 1 2

*





121122123124125126127128129130131132133


68686850

27827830530550

100100100

1.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.2801.280

116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A116-A

0.80 116-B 900.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.800.80

116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B116-B

9090900

180180180180270

000


122123124125126127128129130131132133

0.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.760.76

4.04.04.04.025.025.025.025.025.04.04.04.0

7.07.07.07.012.012.012.012.012.07.07.07.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0

X

Existing Single Metal Clear B900 OfficesB900 OfficesB900 OfficesB900 OfficesB400 HumanitiesB500 TheaterB500 TheaterB500 TheaterB500 TheaterB500 TheaterB600 MusicB600 MusicB600 Music



Left (East)LeftLeftLeftFront

(East) (East) (East) (North)

RearRearRearRearRightFrontFrontFront

(South) (South) (South) (South) (West) (North) (North) (North)

AIR SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS Part 1 of 2 MECH-2-CPROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number:

SYSTEM FEATURES

Page:

AIR SYSTEMS, Central or Single Zone

MANDATORY MEASURES

Heating Equipment Efficiency

Cooling Equipment Efficiency

Heat Pump Thermostat

Furnace Controls

Natural Ventilation

Minimum Ventilation

VAV Minimum Position Control

Demand Control Ventilation

Time Control

Isolation Zones

Pipe Insulation

Duct Insulation

PRESCRIPTIVE MEASURES

Calculated Heating Capacity

Fan Control

Calculated Sensible Cooling Capacity

NOTES TO FIELD - For Building Department Use Only

Setback and Setup Control

Proposed Heating Capacity

Proposed Sensible Cooling Capacity

Simultaneous Heat/Cool

Economizer

Supply Pressure Reset (DDC only)

DP Sensor Location

Outdoor Damper Control

Heating Air Supply Reset

Duct Sealing for Prescriptive Compliance

112(a)

112(a)

112(b)

112(c), 115(a)

121(b)

121(b)

121(c)

121(c)

121(c), 122(e)

122(e)

122(f)

122(g)

123

124

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (c)

144 (c)

144 (c)

144 (d)

144 (e)

144 (f)

144 (k)

Reference on Plans or Specification

1: For each central and single zone air systems (or group of similar units) fill in the reference to sheet number and/or specification section and paragraph number where therequired features are documented. If a requirement is not applicable, put "N/A" in the column.

2: Not required for hydronic heating and cooling. Either enter a value here or put in reference ot plans and specificatons per footnote 1.

T-24Section

ITEM OR SYSTEM TAG(S)

1

2

144 (f)Cooling Air Supply Reset

x 1.43

x 1.21

2

2

2

Number of Systems

3

3: Enter Yes if System is: Constant Volume, Single Zone; Serves < 5,000 sqft; Has > 25% duct in unconditioned space. Duct sealing is required for Prescriptive Compliance,see PERF-1 for performance method duct sealing requirements.

06015


EnergyPro 4.0 by EnergySoft User Number: 2291 17 of 138

100

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

3166 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch

Heating & Cooling Required

R-4.2

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

n/a

360,000 btuh

507,060 btuh

2200

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

7910 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-4.2

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

n/a

250,000 btuh

303,480 btuh

2000

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

9890 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-8.0

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

750,000 btuh

875,000 btuh


No No No

Yes Yes Yes

No Economizer No Economizer No Economizer

Auto

Constant Temp

Auto Auto

Constant Temp Constant Temp

Constant Temp Constant Temp Constant Temp

2 1 5


Job Number:

SYSTEM FEATURES

Page:


MANDATORY MEASURES




Furnace Controls

Natural Ventilation

Minimum Ventilation



Time Control

Isolation Zones

Pipe Insulation

Duct Insulation



Fan Control







Economizer


DP Sensor Location




112(a)

112(a)

112(b)

112(c), 115(a)

121(b)

121(b)

121(c)

121(c)

121(c), 122(e)

122(e)

122(f)

122(g)

123

124

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (c)

144 (c)

144 (c)

144 (d)

144 (e)

144 (f)

144 (k)




T-24Section


1

2


x 1.43

x 1.21

2

2

2

Number of Systems

3


06015



1100

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

4997 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-8.0

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

n/a

20,000 btuh

247,000 btuh

1300

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

3783 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-8.0

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

n/a

200,000 btuh

233,300 btuh

1400

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

11590 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-8.0

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

n/a

465,000 btuh

570,348 btuh


No No No

Yes Yes Yes


Auto

Constant Temp

Auto Auto



1 1 3


Job Number:

SYSTEM FEATURES

Page:


MANDATORY MEASURES




Furnace Controls

Natural Ventilation

Minimum Ventilation



Time Control

Isolation Zones

Pipe Insulation

Duct Insulation



Fan Control







Economizer


DP Sensor Location




112(a)

112(a)

112(b)

112(c), 115(a)

121(b)

121(b)

121(c)

121(c)

121(c), 122(e)

122(e)

122(f)

122(g)

123

124

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (c)

144 (c)

144 (c)

144 (d)

144 (e)

144 (f)

144 (k)




T-24Section


1

2


x 1.43

x 1.21

2

2

2

Number of Systems

3


06015



1600

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

11590 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-8.0

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

n/a

450,000 btuh

525,000 btuh

200

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

12274 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-8.0

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

750,000 btuh

1,055,700 btuh

800

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

6040 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-8.0

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

n/a

450,000 btuh

530,280 btuh


No No No

Yes Yes Yes


Auto

Constant Temp

Auto Auto



3 3 2


Job Number:

SYSTEM FEATURES

Page:


MANDATORY MEASURES




Furnace Controls

Natural Ventilation

Minimum Ventilation



Time Control

Isolation Zones

Pipe Insulation

Duct Insulation



Fan Control







Economizer


DP Sensor Location




112(a)

112(a)

112(b)

112(c), 115(a)

121(b)

121(b)

121(c)

121(c)

121(c), 122(e)

122(e)

122(f)

122(g)

123

124

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (c)

144 (c)

144 (c)

144 (d)

144 (e)

144 (f)

144 (k)




T-24Section


1

2


x 1.43

x 1.21

2

2

2

Number of Systems

3


06015



900

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

826 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-8.0

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

n/a

100,000 btuh

140,000 btuh

400

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

2556 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-8.0

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

n/a

95,000 btuh

104,780 btuh

500

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

23136 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-8.0

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

n/a

480,000 btuh

498,000 btuh


No No No

Yes Yes Yes


Auto

Constant Temp

Auto Auto



2 1 2


Job Number:

SYSTEM FEATURES

Page:


MANDATORY MEASURES




Furnace Controls

Natural Ventilation

Minimum Ventilation



Time Control

Isolation Zones

Pipe Insulation

Duct Insulation



Fan Control







Economizer


DP Sensor Location




112(a)

112(a)

112(b)

112(c), 115(a)

121(b)

121(b)

121(c)

121(c)

121(c), 122(e)

122(e)

122(f)

122(g)

123

124

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (c)

144 (c)

144 (c)

144 (d)

144 (e)

144 (f)

144 (k)




T-24Section


1

2


x 1.43

x 1.21

2

2

2

Number of Systems

3


06015



600

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

5417 cfm

No

No

Programmable Switch


R-8.0

No

n/a

Constant Volume

n/a

n/a

350,000 btuh

390,960 btuh


No

Yes

No Economizer

Auto

Constant Temp

Constant Temp

2

WATER SIDE SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS Part 2 of 2 MECH-2-CPROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number:

SYSTEM FEATURES

Page:

WATER SIDE SYSTEMS: Chillers, Towers, Boilers, Hydronic Loops

MANDATORY MEASURESEquipment Efficiency

Pipe Insulation

PRESCRIPTIVE MEASURESCalculated Capacity

Proposed Capacity

Tower Fan Controls

Tower Flow Controls

Variable Flow System Design

Chiller and Boiler Isolation

VSD on CHW, CW & WLHP Pumps > 5HPDP Sensor Location

MANDATORY MEASURES

Water Heater Certification

Pool and Spa Installation

Service Water Heating Installation


CHW and HHW Reset Controls

Water Heater Efficiency

Pool and Spa Efficiency and Control

Spa Heater - No Pilot Light

Pool Heater - No Pilot Light

WLHP Isolation Valves

112(a)

123

144 (a & b)

144 (a & b)

144 (h)

144 (h)

144 (j)

144 (j)

144 (j)

144 (j)

144 (j)

144 (j)

113 (a)

113 (b)

113 (c)

114 (a)

114 (b)

115 (c)

115 (d)


1: For each water heater, pool heat and domestic water loop (or groups of similar equipment) fill in the reference to sheet number and/or specification section andparagraph number where the required features are documented. If a requirement is not applicable, put "N/A" ins the column.

1: For each chiller, cooling tower, boiler, and hydronic loop (or groups of similar equipment) fill in the reference to sheet number and/or specification section and paragraphnumber where the required features are documented. If a requirement is not applicable, put "N/A" in the column.

T-24Section


1

Service Hot Water, Pool Heating

2: Water side systems include wet side system using other liquids such as glycol or brine.

2

Reference on Plans or Specification1

Number of Systems

ITEM OR SYSTEM TAG(S)Number of Systems

06015



TRANE CVHE (400)

0.470 kW/ton

CHW Piping

n/a

800 tons

n/a

n/a

Required

Required

Required

Required

AT-212-324

10 F App

n/a

1000 tons

n/a

Variable-Speed-Fan

Fixed-Temp

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

KN-20 Hydrotherm

88%

HW Piping

n/a

8,795,600 btuh

Required

n/a

Required

Required

n/a

Required


n/a n/a n/a

2 1 5

MECHANICAL VENTILATION MECH-3-CPROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number:

MECHANICAL VENTILATION (Section 121(b)2)

Page:

A B C D E F G H I J KAREA BASIS OCCUPANCY BASIS

Min C

FMby O

ccupant(E x F)

REQ

'D V.A

Max of

(D or G

)

B x 0.4

CFM

/sq. ft.

ZONE/SYSTEM

ConditionA

rea(SF)

CFM

perSquare Foot

Min C

FMby A

rea(B

x C)

Num

ber ofPeople

CFM

perPerson

Design

Vent. Air

CFM

30% of D

esignZone Supply

CFM

CBased on fixed seat or the greater of the expected number of occupants and 50% of the CBC occupant load for egress purposes for spaces without fixed seating.Required Ventilation Air (REQ'D V.A.) is the larger of the ventilation rates calculated on and AREA or OCCUPANCY BASIS (column D or G).

Max of

Colum

ns H, J,

K or 300 C

FM

Design M

in. Air

Setpoint

Transfer Air

L M NVAV MINIMUM

PRESCRIPTIVE REHEATLIMITATION (Section 144(d))

Design fan supply cfm (Fan CFM) x 30%; or

Minimum ventilation rate per Section 121, Table 121-A

Must be greater than or equal to H, or use Transfer Air (column N) to make up the difference.

Condition area (ft. sq.) x 04 cfm/ft. sq.; orMaximum of Columns H, J, K, or 300 cfmThis must be less than or equal to Column L and greater that or equal to the sum of Columns H + N.Transfer air must be provided where the Required Ventilation Air (column H) is greater than the Design Minimum Air (column M). Where required, transfer air must be greater than orequal to the difference between the Required Ventilation Air (column H) and the Design Minimum Air (column M), column H - M.

EHIJKLMN

06015



B100 Administration

100

B2200 Bussiness

2200

B2000 Campus Center

2000

B1100 Math & Eng

1100

B1300 Electronics

1300

B1400 Phys. Science

1400

B1600 Life Sience

1600

B200 Library

200

B800 Social Science

800

B900 Offices

900

B400 Humanities

400

21,104

13,183

32,968

11,660

8,826

19,316

19,316

40,914

20,132

5,506

3,408

0.32

0.32

0.32

0.32

0.32

0.32

0.32

0.15

0.32

0.15

0.32

211.0

527.3

659.4

333.1

252.2

772.6

772.6

818.3

402.6

55.1

170.4

15.0

15.0

15.0

15.0

15.0

15.0

15.0

15.0

15.0

15.0

15.0

3,166

Total

7,910

Total

9,890

Total

4,997

Total

3,783

Total

11,590

Total

11,590

Total

12,274

Total

6,040

Total

826

Total

2,556

Total

6,753

6,753

7,910

7,910

10,550

10,550

4,997

4,997

3,783

3,783

11,590

11,590

11,590

11,590

12,274

12,274

6,442

6,442

826

826

2,556

2,556

3,166

3,166

7,910

7,910

9,890

9,890

4,997

4,997

3,783

3,783

11,590

11,590

11,590

11,590

12,274

12,274

6,040

6,040

826

826

2,556

2,556

3,588

659

403

6,753

4,219

10,550

3,731

2,824

6,181

6,181

6,137

6,442

826

1,091

B500 Theater 23,136 1.07 1,542.4 15.0 23,136 24,756 23,136 1,62024,756


500

B600 Music 12,640 0.32 4,045 361.1 15.0

Total

5,417

24,756

5,417

23,136

5,417

MECHANICAL VENTILATION MECH-3-CPROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number:

MECHANICAL VENTILATION (Section 121(b)2)

Page:

A B C D E F G H I J KAREA BASIS OCCUPANCY BASIS

Min C

FMby O

ccupant(E x F)

REQ

'D V.A

Max of

(D or G

)

B x 0.4

CFM

/sq. ft.

ZONE/SYSTEM

ConditionA

rea(SF)

CFM

perSquare Foot

Min C

FMby A

rea(B

x C)

Num

ber ofPeople

CFM

perPerson

Design

Vent. Air

CFM

30% of D

esignZone Supply

CFM

CBased on fixed seat or the greater of the expected number of occupants and 50% of the CBC occupant load for egress purposes for spaces without fixed seating.Required Ventilation Air (REQ'D V.A.) is the larger of the ventilation rates calculated on and AREA or OCCUPANCY BASIS (column D or G).

Max of

Colum

ns H, J,

K or 300 C

FM

Design M

in. Air

Setpoint

Transfer Air

L M NVAV MINIMUM

PRESCRIPTIVE REHEATLIMITATION (Section 144(d))

Design fan supply cfm (Fan CFM) x 30%; or

Minimum ventilation rate per Section 121, Table 121-A

Must be greater than or equal to H, or use Transfer Air (column N) to make up the difference.

Condition area (ft. sq.) x 04 cfm/ft. sq.; orMaximum of Columns H, J, K, or 300 cfmThis must be less than or equal to Column L and greater that or equal to the sum of Columns H + N.Transfer air must be provided where the Required Ventilation Air (column H) is greater than the Design Minimum Air (column M). Where required, transfer air must be greater than orequal to the difference between the Required Ventilation Air (column H) and the Design Minimum Air (column M), column H - M.

EHIJKLMN

06015



600 Total 5,417 5,417


PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:

CENTRAL SYSTEM RATINGS

System Name

System Type

Output

Aux.kW

Eff.

Economizer Type

Output

ConditionStatus

Efficiency

HEATING COOLING

CENTRAL SYSTEM FAN SUMMARY

System Name

Fan Type

SUPPLY FAN

Motor Location

CFM

BHPMotor

Eff.DriveEff.

CFM

BHP

MotorEff.

DriveEff.

RETURN FAN

Qty

CHILLER AND TOWER SUMMARY

Equipment Name

Equipment Type

Efficiency

Tons

DriveEff.

Tot.Qty

GPM

BHP

PUMPSMotor

Eff.

Qty.

System Name

System Type

EnergyFactoror RE

Ext.R-Val.

TANK INSUL.

Qty

DHW / BOILER SUMMARY

PumpControl

Distribution Type

RatedInput

Vol.(Gals.)

StandbyLoss or

Pilot

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DETAILS Part 1 of 2 MECH-5-C

Hot Water PumpMULTI-FAMILY CENTRAL WATER HEATING DETAILS

Control # HP Type In Plenum Outside BuriedAdd 1/2"Insulation

Hot Water Piping Length (ft)

ConditionStatus

06015



MZ 11750 CFM w/RBuilt-Up MZ 180,000 0.0 n/a No Economizer304,236 Existingn/a

MZ 11750 CFM w/RConstant Volume Draw-Through 11,750 7.50 88.5% 85.0% 11,750 5.62 87.5% 85.0%

2MZ 14000 CFM

Built-Up MZ 250,000 0.0 n/a No Economizer364,200 Existingn/a1MZ 8100

Built-Up MZ 150,000 0.0 n/a No Economizer210,000 Existingn/a8MZ 11400 CFM



Built-Up MZ 155,000 0.0 n/a No Economizer228,139 Existingn/a3

MZ 14000 CFMConstant Volume Blow-Through 14,050 7.00 87.5% 85.0% none

MZ 8100Constant Volume Draw-Through 8,100 5.50 87.5% 85.0% none

MZ 11400 CFMConstant Volume Draw-Through 11,400 8.00 88.5% 85.0% none



MZ 16300Constant Volume Draw-Through 16,300 10.00 89.5% 85.0% 16,300 4.70 86.5% 85.0%

MZ 16300 Built-Up MZ 250,000 0.0 n/a No Economizer422,280 Existingn/a3

TRANE CVHE (400) Centrifugal 0.470 kW/ton 4002

Secondary CHW Pumps 100.0%3 600 18.75 93.0%

AT-212-324 Tower w/31.0 bhp fan 10 F Approach 1,000 100.0%1 2,400 30.00 94.1%1

KN-20 Hydrotherm Large Gas 0.88 0.00% 4.2

Variable-Speed

One-Speed, 3 WayValves

Hydronic Heating 1,999,000 26


New

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:

CENTRAL SYSTEM RATINGS

System Name

System Type

Output

Aux.kW

Eff.

Economizer Type

Output

ConditionStatus

Efficiency

HEATING COOLING

CENTRAL SYSTEM FAN SUMMARY

System Name

Fan Type

SUPPLY FAN

Motor Location

CFM

BHPMotor

Eff.DriveEff.

CFM

BHP

MotorEff.

DriveEff.

RETURN FAN

Qty

CHILLER AND TOWER SUMMARY

Equipment Name

Equipment Type

Efficiency

Tons

DriveEff.

Tot.Qty

GPM

BHP

PUMPSMotor

Eff.

Qty.

System Name

System Type

EnergyFactoror RE

Ext.R-Val.

TANK INSUL.

Qty

DHW / BOILER SUMMARY

PumpControl

Distribution Type

RatedInput

Vol.(Gals.)

StandbyLoss or

Pilot

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DETAILS Part 1 of 2 MECH-5-C

Hot Water PumpMULTI-FAMILY CENTRAL WATER HEATING DETAILS

Control # HP Type In Plenum Outside BuriedAdd 1/2"Insulation

Hot Water Piping Length (ft)

ConditionStatus

06015



MZ 12300Built-Up MZ 225,000 0.0 n/a No Economizer318,000 Existingn/a


2MZ 3200




Built-Up MZ 175,000 0.0 n/a No Economizer234,500 Existingn/a2





Building Loop Pumps 100.0%1 800 0.00 40.2%

Hot Water Pumps 100.0%2 300 11.25 91.7%

One-Speed, 3 WayValvesVariable-Speed


PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:

HEATING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRICS (Airstream Temperatures at Time of Heating Peak)

HVAC SYSTEM HEATING AND COOLING LOADS SUMMARY

SYSTEM NAME FLOOR AREA

Return Vented LightingReturn Air Ducts

Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS

VentilationSupply Fan

Supply Air Ducts

COOLING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRICS (Airstream Temperatures at Time of Cooling Peak)

ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

SensibleCFM Latent CFM SensibleCOIL COOLING PEAK COIL HTG. PEAK

HVAC EQUIPMENT SELECTION

Total Output (Tons)

Total Output (Btuh/sqft)

Total Output (sqft/Ton)

Total Adjusted System Output

TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads

(Adjusted for Peak Design Conditions)

Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)

Note: values above given at ARI conditions

Outside Air (cfm/sqft)

Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



100 21,104

0

13,14019,423

38,478

25,797 351,088606,208

180,000

360,000

-38,478

151,26389,647

-50,77050,770

19,423 13,140

-10,2913,166 3,166

26.0 65.0 79.4 81.4

80.9

70.069.571.0

103.0 / 69.9 79.9 / 63.5 59.6 / 55.8

62.4 / 56.8

74.0 / 61.674.8 / 61.876.3 / 62.4

101,412 360,000507,060

304,236

608,472

50.7

MZ 11750 CFM w/R

101,412 360,000507,060

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

262,793388,46631,553 22,729

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFoFo

36,088

11,750

23,500

1.11

463.5

13.5

28.8

2

17.1

416.2

0.15

49.7%

23500 cfm

3166 cfm

Return Fan

3166 cfm

Fo61.6 / 56.5

Supply Fan

23500 cfm

Outside Air

23500 cfm

23500 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

Return Fan

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



2200 13,183

0

5,68714,606

0

13,661 467,371580,550

250,000

250,000

0

366,227235,264

-23,96323,963

14,606 5,687

-76,5107,910 7,910

26.0 45.1 46.7 63.4

63.1

70.069.6

103.0 / 69.9 90.8 / 67.3 92.4 / 67.8 72.0 / 60.9

73.0 / 61.2

74.0 / 63.675.0 / 63.9

60,720 250,000303,480

364,200

364,200

30.4

MZ 14000 CFM

60,720 250,000303,480

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

113,734292,111272,860 -15,419

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

90,172

14,050

14,050

1.07

462.9

56.3

27.6

1

19.0

434.4

0.60

57.0%14050 cfm

7910 cfm

14050 cfm

7910 cfm

Supply Fan

Outside Air

Supply Fan

Outside Air

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



2000 32,968

0

8,38023,531

0

60,393 550,100910,529

150,000

750,000

0

459,886298,708

-94,14194,141

23,531 8,380

-52,3589,890 9,890

26.0 59.1 76.6 78.7

78.5

70.069.8

103.0 / 69.9 81.5 / 64.4 61.1 / 56.6

63.9 / 57.7

74.0 / 62.274.5 / 62.4

175,000 750,000875,000

210,000

1,050,000

87.5

MZ 8100

175,000 750,000875,000

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

167,595470,61043,807 18,470

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

112,751

8,100

40,500

1.23

462.9

24.4

31.8

5

22.7

376.8

0.30

52.0%

9890 cfm

9890 cfm

Fo63.3 / 57.5

Supply Fan

40500 cfm

Outside Air

40500 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



1100 11,660

0

4,46710,320

0

15,796 302,638403,416

20,000

20,000

0

231,434149,303

-27,07727,077

10,320 4,467

-41,1714,997 4,997

26.0 50.5 52.2 54.4

54.0

70.069.6

103.0 / 69.9 87.2 / 66.4 66.8 / 59.0

69.9 / 60.1

74.0 / 63.174.9 / 63.4

53,000 20,000247,000

300,000

300,000

25.0

MZ 11400 CFM

53,000 20,000247,000

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

89,346206,39547,078 -5,269

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

56,967

11,400

11,400

0.98

456.0

43.8

25.7

1

1.7

466.4

0.43

55.3%

4997 cfm

4997 cfm

Fo69.0 / 59.8

Supply Fan

11400 cfm

Outside Air

11400 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



1300 8,826

0

3,5697,879

0

16,607 226,861314,104

200,000

200,000

0

175,416113,679

-27,07727,077

7,879 3,569

-26,5153,783 3,783

26.0 54.4 71.8 74.2

73.9

70.069.7

103.0 / 69.9 84.6 / 65.5 64.3 / 58.0

67.3 / 59.1

74.0 / 62.874.7 / 63.0

46,700 200,000233,300

280,000

280,000

23.3

MZ 10800

46,700 200,000233,300

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

71,384157,58922,165 17,316

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

43,121

10,800

10,800

1.22

462.9

35.0

31.7

1

22.7

378.3

0.43

53.9%

3783 cfm

3783 cfm

Fo66.6 / 58.9

Supply Fan

10800 cfm

Outside Air

10800 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



1400 19,316

0

5,92318,631

0

36,537 612,518814,950

155,000

465,000

0

538,694348,583

-56,48556,485

18,631 5,923

-95,58411,590 11,590

26.0 50.6 67.2 69.2

69.0

70.069.8

103.0 / 69.9 87.1 / 66.3 66.8 / 59.0

69.4 / 59.9

74.0 / 63.174.7 / 63.4

114,069 465,000570,348

228,139

684,417

57.0

MZ 8800

114,069 465,000570,348

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

118,463372,62076,842 -107,638

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

132,121

8,800

26,400

1.37

462.9

43.9

35.4

3

24.1

338.7

0.60

55.3%

11590 cfm

11590 cfm

Fo68.8 / 59.7

Supply Fan

26400 cfm

Outside Air

26400 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



1600 19,316

0

6,06018,636

0

31,047 615,233814,368

150,000

450,000

0

538,404347,867

-56,48556,485

18,636 6,060

-101,07511,590 11,590

26.0 48.9 66.3 68.5

68.3

70.069.8

103.0 / 69.9 88.2 / 66.7 67.9 / 59.4

70.8 / 60.4

74.0 / 63.374.7 / 63.5

105,000 450,000525,000

210,000

630,000

52.5

MZ 8100

105,000 450,000525,000

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

121,195372,717108,665 -66,874

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

132,121

8,100

24,300

1.26

462.9

47.7

32.6

3

23.3

367.9

0.60

55.9%

11590 cfm

11590 cfm

Fo70.0 / 60.2

Supply Fan

24300 cfm

Outside Air

24300 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



200 40,914

0

19,05037,599

48,827

73,503 850,6221,332,575

250,000

750,000

-48,827

580,742356,140

-100,405100,405

37,599 19,050

-66,42312,274 12,274

26.0 59.4 73.8 75.8

75.4

70.069.670.6

103.0 / 69.9 82.5 / 64.7 62.2 / 57.1

64.8 / 58.0

74.0 / 62.274.7 / 62.575.7 / 62.8

211,140 750,0001,055,700

422,280

1,266,840

105.6

MZ 16300

211,140 750,0001,055,700

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

381,010751,98677,397 66,449

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFoFo

139,926

16,300

48,900

1.20

463.2

25.1

31.0

3

18.3

387.6

0.30

52.1%

48900 cfm

12274 cfm

Return Fan

12274 cfm

Fo64.1 / 57.8

Supply Fan

48900 cfm

Outside Air

48900 cfm

48900 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

Return Fan

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



800 20,132

0

6,41514,446

0

36,742 373,712548,179

225,000

450,000

0

280,505182,362

-47,92747,927

14,446 6,415

-32,1106,040 6,040

26.0 59.0 76.2 78.1

77.8

70.069.8

103.0 / 69.9 81.5 / 64.4 61.2 / 56.7

63.6 / 57.6

74.0 / 62.274.6 / 62.4

105,720 450,000530,280

318,000

636,000

53.0

MZ 12300

105,720 450,000530,280

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

128,302288,93026,225 15,427

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

68,851

12,300

24,600

1.22

464.2

24.6

31.6

2

22.4

379.8

0.30

52.0%

6040 cfm

6040 cfm

Fo63.1 / 57.4

Supply Fan

24600 cfm

Outside Air

24600 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



900 5,506

0

4,3105,617

0

6,824 105,132175,980

50,000

100,000

0

38,01824,699

-27,70327,703

5,617 4,310

-2,592826 826

26.0 63.8 78.5 82.6

81.9

70.069.4

103.0 / 69.9 78.5 / 63.0 57.9 / 55.1

62.8 / 57.0

74.0 / 61.574.8 / 61.8

26,000 100,000140,000

83,000

166,000

13.8

MZ 3200

26,000 100,000140,000

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

86,197112,3449,415 6,805

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

9,415

3,200

6,400

1.16

462.7

12.9

30.1

2

18.2

398.0

0.15

49.5%

826 cfm

826 cfm

Fo61.9 / 56.6

Supply Fan

6400 cfm

Outside Air

6400 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



400 3,408

0

2,3433,946

0

12,584 156,328178,101

95,000

95,000

0

118,63977,435

-13,85213,852

3,946 2,343

-16,5552,556 2,556

26.0 55.9 67.0 68.6

68.3

70.069.7

103.0 / 69.9 83.5 / 65.2 71.3 / 60.5

73.3 / 61.2

74.0 / 62.674.5 / 62.7

21,020 95,000104,780

125,800

125,800

10.5

MZ 4850

21,020 95,000104,780

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

46,85578,915114,264 -26,223

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFo

29,138

8,100

8,100

2.38

772.7

31.6

36.9

1

27.9

325.1

0.75

53.3%

2556 cfm

2556 cfm

Fo72.9 / 61.0

Supply Fan

8100 cfm

Outside Air

8100 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



500 23,136

0

6,17429,833

12,499

-12,545 1,182,5511,368,408

240,000

480,000

-12,499

1,086,934667,320

-27,70327,703

29,833 6,174

-276,29623,136 23,136

26.0 26.0 45.7 46.8

46.5

70.069.770.3

103.0 / 69.9 103.0 / 69.7 82.6 / 63.5

85.1 / 64.3

74.0 / 64.375.3 / 64.775.8 / 64.9

0 480,000498,000

249,000

498,000

41.5

MZ 11500

0 480,000498,000

Aug 3 pm Jan 12 am

123,473596,664-50,860 -4,959

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFoFo

263,750

11,500

23,000

0.99

554.2

100.6

21.5

2

20.7

557.5

1.00

59.5%

23000 cfm

23136 cfm

Return Fan

23136 cfm

Fo83.7 / 63.9

Supply Fan

23000 cfm

Outside Air

23000 cfm

23000 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

Return Fan

PROJECT NAME DATE

Job Number: Page:





Return Fan

SYSTEM LOAD

TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD

Total Output (Btuh)

Output (Btuh/sqft)

ENGINEERING CHECKS


Supply Air Ducts


ROOMSHeating Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

ROOMSCooling Coil

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts



Total Output (Tons)




TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK

Total Room Loads


Heating System

Cooling System

Airflow (cfm)

Airflow (cfm/sqft)

Airflow (cfm/Ton)

Air System

Outside Air (%)



Total Output (Btuh)

Number of Systems

Output per System

Output per System

CFM per System

R.H.

06015



600 12,640

0

3,96610,287

0

28,075 297,999431,174

175,000

350,000

0

251,821163,660

-41,08041,080

10,287 3,966

-33,6815,417 5,417

26.0 56.7 74.9 77.0

76.8

70.069.869.8

103.0 / 69.9 83.1 / 65.0 62.7 / 57.3

65.4 / 58.3

74.0 / 62.574.5 / 62.774.5 / 62.7

78,040 350,000390,960

234,500

469,000

39.1

MZ 9050

78,040 350,000390,960

Jul 3 pm Jan 12 am

79,325205,74522,497 10,933

Fo Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFoFo

Fo Fo Fo

Fo

FoFoFo

61,755

9,050

18,100

1.43

463.1

29.9

37.1

2

27.7

323.4

0.43

53.0%

18100 cfm

5417 cfm

Return Fan

5417 cfm

Fo64.8 / 58.1

Supply Fan

18100 cfm

Outside Air

18100 cfm

18100 cfm

Outside Air

Supply Fan

Return Fan

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 17 - OCTOBER 10, 2007 10.10

AMENDED LEASE AGREEMENT WITH IN-DEPENDENT ORDER OF ODD FELLOWS FOR 1504 MARKET STREET (Continued)

It was moved by Mrs. Patricia Hunn, seconded by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, and carried TO APPROVE THE AMENDED LEASE WITH THE INDEPENDENT OR-DER OF ODD FELLOWS, REDDING LODGE 271, FOR THE DOWNTOWN MALL LOCATION AT 1504 MARKET STREET, AS SUBMITTED.

10.11

MODERNIZATION OF POWER PLANTS (BUILD-INGS 600, 800, 1400, 2000, 2200)

Joe Wyse stated that last month they discussed the need to modernize power plants. The two main options are out-lined in the background on Page 127 of the agenda. The District could hire a professional engineering person. An-ther option is to hire a sole source provider who would act as project manager. With either option, the District has to do the financing. There is approximately $235,000 available in rebates from PG&E. The District can take a low interest loan with a 15-year term from the California Energy Commis-sion for ten times the annual energy savings the project provides. The estimated loan would be $1.2 million. The remainder of the project costs would need to be financed either through a lease revenue bond or directly through a bank loan. Mr. Wyse recommended the Board authorize the Admini-stration to enter into an agreement for the option which provides the best solution for the District. The Admini-stration is leaning toward the second option. To ensure that our interests are well represented with the Trane pro-posal, they will have CEC review all the plans and get some independent project management to oversee this. Rayola Pratt said it sounds too iffy about project manag-ers. They should be definitive about this contract. Pat Hunn asked how the District would make payments on the $1.2 million loan. Joe Wyse said the payments would come from the general budget and they are devel-oping the budget for that. The term would be 15 years, the same length of time as the CEC loan. He is estimat-

DMELINE

Highlight


MODERNIZATION OF POWER PLANTS (BUILD-INGS 600, 800, 1400, 2000, 2200) (Continued)

ing $100,000 a year for 15 years. If the District doesn’t do this project it will lose the rebate from PG&E that brings down the price. We have to replace this equip-ment. It’s not going to last 15 years. Kendall Pierson asked Joe Wyse what the estimated en-ergy savings were and Mr. Wyse said it would be ap-proximately $120,000 a year. Mr. Pierson asked what the estimated life of the new equipment would be. Mr. Wyse said in 25 years it will pay for itself. The District has got-ten nearly 40 years on the present equipment because of good upkeep. The minimum life for this large equipment is 25 years. Pat Hunn said, then, that the Administration can assure the Board that we can make that payment. Mr. Wyse said yes. Martin Myers said they’ve been talking about this for years. We have to bite the bullet. Rather than this be-coming an immediate need, this is planned. Mr. Myers said ultimately, he would like to see some graphs on the payback. Mr. Lucas said the Administration would be coming back to the Board on the contract but asked if he is correct that the administration wants permission to go ahead and ne-gotiate. It was moved by Mr. Harold Lucas TO AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE A CON-TRACT. Mr. Lewis said that would work to everyone’s advantage, giving them time to have an independent contractor look at everything. Mrs. Rayola Pratt asked how much it will cost to look into this. Mr. Wyse said a proposal was arriving on Monday for the project manager that would represent our interests. We have a free review from CEC that will cost nothing. There will be some attorney fees to get the con-tract going. Mrs. Pratt asked if everything was included



in this item. Mr. Wyse said it did not include the separate manager. Mr. Lucas said he was not sure the item was written as clearly as it might be. They were going to submit a contract to do engineering studies. The Board was going to review engineering studies and the studies would come up with the cost of the project. He reiterated that the Board was not approving a contract now; just the nod to negotiate. President Lewis said the preferred second option is a sole source provider. They will do the engineering. We’ve al-ready paid $80,000 for some engineering. They would go forward doing the rest of the engineering to get us to bid and then they would be the project manager because they would take the project. If we contract with Trane, it would be the same as the residence halls – it goes through the Shasta Builders Exchange. They take 10 +10 on top of it (10% for overhead and 10% for profit). Mr. Lucas said the engineering study lines out the project. The project manager is separate. Judi Beck said this is déjà vu. We did this two years ago and we’re out $80,000 and now we’re going with Trane again. Gary Lewis said the last time around, he came into his position at the tail end of the planning. There was infor-mation communicated to the staff and to the Board on warranties by the salespeople. Then when they came back they said we’d have to pay for it. Since then, it has been determined that the co-generation plant cannot be done in California now because of rules and legislation. They have gone back to the concept of not having a central plant but, instead, to replace the boilers and chillers in the buildings - that is what has dropped the cost to $2.7 mil-lion from $4.9 million. This is a little different. They worked with Trane on the dorm project and feel comfort-able that they did a good job. Before we progress further, we will have an individual look at what they are propos-ing and the Board can say yes or no. A lot of what they’ve already done through Tony Costa Engineering is



what reduces this project to $2.7 million. Gary Lewis said they have studied what is needed in each building. Mr. Lucas said the Board lacks the specificity to approve anything. The recommendation says “to enter into an agreement for the option.” That option needs to be run by the Board so we can agree that it is the best option. Gary Lewis agreed, saying the Administration will be in the position by the November meeting to have the factual information on both of these. Mr. Wyse said they will bring in an actual negotiated contract also. Mr. Lucas reiterated his earlier motion TO AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE A CON-TRACT WHICH WILL OFFER THE BEST SOLUTION FOR THE DISTRICT. Mrs. Patricia Hunn seconded. The motion carried.

10.12 RESOLUTION TO ALLO-

CATE BOND INTEREST PROCEEDS TO SPECIFIC BOND PROJECTS

Mr. Wyse recommended approval. It was moved by Mrs. Patricia Hunn, seconded by Mrs. Cheri Beck, and carried TO ADOPT THE RESOLU-TION APPROVING THE ALLOCATION OF BOND INTEREST PROCEEDS IN THE AMOUNTS OF $1 MILLION TO THE TEHAMA COLLEGE CENTER AND $200,000 TO THE WEAVERVILLE EXTENDED EDUCATION SITE.

10.13 REVISIONS TO STUDENT

FEE SCHEDULE Mr. Wyse recommended approval, noting that the Ad-

ministration brings updated fees to the Board twice a year. It was moved by Mrs. Judi Beck, seconded by Mrs. Patricia Hunn, and carried TO APPROVE THE MODI-FIED STUDENT FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2007-08, EF-FECTIVE SPRING 2008.

MEETING OF THE CAPITAL OUTLAY COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES

SHASTA-TEHAMA-TRINITY JOINT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2007

MINUTES The Board of Trustees Capital Outlay Committee of the Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District met on Wednesday, November 14, 2007, in Redding, California.

1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Harold Lucas, Capital Outlay Committee Chairperson, at 6:09 p.m.

2. ROLL CALL Roll Call indicated the following:

Trustees Present Mrs. Cheri A. Beck Mrs. Patricia A. Hunn Mr. Harold J. Lucas Mr. Kendall S. Pierson Mrs. Rayola B. Pratt Trustees Absent Mrs. Judi D. Beck Mr. Martin B. Myers Ms. Bonnie Wilson-Schmitt

3.

POTENTIAL LEASE REVENUE BONDS

Mr. Harold Lucas asked for a brief rundown of past history, heating and cooling needs, past dealings with Trane and where we are at this time. Mr. Joe Wyse, Vice President of Administrative Services, explained that the college’s heating and cooling system is 40 years old. They are not looking at cogeneration. Two or three years ago, before he arrived at Shasta College, the Administration had some dealings with Trane. The college had an initial engineering study done by Trane. Mr. Wyse introduced Mike Ketchum of Trane, who said as a result of the study done in 2006, the plan was to put in a cogeneration system. Since 2006, the new state pollution requirements make cogeneration no longer a viable choice.

MEETING OF THE BOARD’S CAPITAL OUTLAY COMMITTEE - 2 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007

3.

POTENTIAL LEASE REVENUE BONDS(Continued)

Mr. Lucas asked what the District spent on that engineering study. Mr. Wyse said it cost $85,000. Mr. Lucas asked what benefits the District got out of that study. Mike Ketchum said when they presented the study in mid-2006 there was a significant delay because of some difficulties in relationships. By the time 2007 rolled around, no one knew the state pollution ad-justment was coming. When the new limits were put on, the cogene-ration market changed completely. The companies pulled out of the California market. One company meets the 2007 regulations but they don’t have a service team to serve Redding so cogeneration can’t be put at this site; therefore, the scope has changed. The study provides information on all the different equipment rooms, interconnections, loading on the buildings, computer simulation models, and calcula-tions. It still sets the basis for what the new plan is. Since the market has changed, there is a new scope. Mr. Lucas asked if they can build on the engineering study. Mr. Ketchum said yes, it is the foundation. It provides all the loading in-formation. Mr. Lucas said there is some cogeneration available in California, up to about 500 kilowatts. The Finley Center in Santa Rosa just put in cogeneration. They are putting energy back into the grid. Mike Ketchum said he didn’t know that system. Those companies that left California thought it was too difficult to meet the standards. The Finely Center may have been designed before 2007 and is perhaps grandfathered in. Mr. Ketchum said SPV is a company that meets the 2007 regulations and they will go as far north as San Francisco, in providing service. Mr. Ketchum said he doubted that this is the same company as the one in Santa Rosa. Mr. Lucas said he went to the web site of the California Energy Com-mission. He said Trane stated that there is no cogeneration available in California. Mike Ketchum said there is no cogeneration that will serve Shasta College in Redding. Microturbines are efficient for electricity but poor in heat. Cogeneration generates heat. If you had a single pool, 30-45 kilowatt unit that might make sense but not a central plant - it wouldn’t make sense. Mr. Joe Wyse stated that the biggest project in this lease revenue bond is replacing the heating and cooling. He introduced bond attor-ney David Casnocha from Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth.


3.


Joe Wyse explained the lease revenue bonds in his PowerPoint: Lease Financings

No Voter Approval Board Authorization Exempt from Debt Limitation

California Community College Financing Authority JPA Established in 1995 Provides financing programs to California Community

College Districts Pooled issuance expenses Low, tax exempt interest rates 12 Transactions completed since 1996 20 Community College

Shasta issued $5.3 Million in LRBs through the Au-thority in 2001

$178 Million in Financing completed to date Projects to be financed

HVAC Mechanical Room Replacement Project ADA Compliance Projects Air Conditioning Projects Bleacher Replacement Repair/Remodel Locker Room Showers

Repayment Revenues $100,000+ RDA revenues identified for debt service

Resolution parameters Authorizes lease-purchase financing documentation Not-to-exceed $4 million Repayment term not-to-exceed 35 years (20 years ex-

pected) Participating Districts

Mt. San Antonio - $11.4 million (approved) Mt. San Jacinto - $9 million (November 8 Board con-

sideration) Shasta-Tehama-Trinity - $4 million (November 14

Board consideration) Timeline

November, 2007 – District Board approvals December, 2007 – Finalize documentation January, 2008 – Receive credit ratings, mail offering

document to potential investors, establish interest rates February, 2008 – Closing, delivery of funds for pro-

jects


3.


Mr. Pierson asked Joe Wyse how firm the monetary amounts were. Mr. Wyse said on the theatre work, Larry Hopson has given us a breakdown of the costs. A bid has been received for the concrete work at Memorial Stadium for $160,000. If there are estimates on any of the projects, they were estimated on the high end. Gary Lewis said the gym bleachers can’t be repaired any more. They are deficient in terms of handrails. There are potential safety issues. Mr. Wyse said the projects listed from the theatre down all would qualify for redevelopment monies. They are all public areas. Mr. Wyse asked David Casnocha to speak about the lease revenue bonds. Mr. Casnocha said he was bond counsel for the Measure A bond in 2002. He explained that the lease revenue bond would team up this District and Mt. San Jacinto. The wording ensures that, in no event can the bonds be issued in excess of $4 million and they cannot exceed $.049 %. The District is borrowing against equity. In 2001, the District put up 3, 6, and 16 as collateral. The District will have to identify other buildings to pledge as collateral for the loan. They ob-ligate you to budget the necessary amount each year even though you expect redevelopment money. You are obligating the general fund of the district. Mr. Lucas asked what the repayment schedule was. Mr. Wyse said it is a 20-year schedule. On the redevelopment monies, it starts lower and builds itself up. Mr. Wyse said the final payment is $220,000, 20 years from now. It will grow just as our redevelopment income grows. Since 1997, we have received more than they told us to expect. Between now and 20 years, there is approximately $3 mil-lion that this borrowing will pay out. They estimate $4.2 million in income for us over that period of time. It gives us a cushion if some year it doesn’t come in as expected. Mr. Lucas asked if the issue with housing affects redevelopment. Mr. Wyse said, as he understands it, the redevelopment involves taxes on the commercial areas, not residential. David Casnocha said whenever an asset is identified, the investors have a remedy. The legal documents will allow you to substitute pro-jects. The District will not be impeded in any way; the District has reserved a great deal of flexibility as long as it is for a governmental purpose. They are not bound to that list. Kendall Pierson asked what interest rates are running. Mr. Casnocha said the interest rate cannot exceed 6.5%. Mr. Wyse said on an aver-


3. POTENTIAL LEASE REVENUE BONDS(Continued)

age they have been running 4.5 – 4.6%. Mr. Casnocha said even though the districts do not have a AAA rating on their own, they will get bond insurance from a AAA company, which drives the interest rate below 5%. Kendall Pierson asked how much the insurance was. Mr. Wyse said the insurance will be $50,000. Mr. Casnocha said the District would get bids for insurance. The underwriter will offer in-terest with insurance and interest without insurance. Kendall Pierson said if the interest today is 4.5%, then we lock in at the time we subscribe to the rate. Mr. Wyse said yes, when the bonds are sold in February, it will be set at that time. Interest is affected by having or not having insurance. Mr. Pierson asked what an interest rate is tied to. Mr. Casnocha said it is tied to the 20-year treasury rate. Mr. Wyse asked if there were any other questions about the lease revenue and the projects. There were none. Gary Lewis thanked Joe Wyse for the time he put in on this topic.

4.

FINAL REPORT ON HEALTH SCIENCES & UNIVERSITY CENTER

Mr. Dan Prideaux distributed a handout. Mr. Lucas asked Mr. Prideaux to explain what the dome DSA issues are. Mr. Prideaux said the dome on the Health Sciences and University Center was part of the original design but DSA has not figured out how to evaluate a fiberglass dome. Right now we have a proposal from the architect to DSA asking if they would approve it if we load-test it. Mr. Prideaux said he used to be a test engineer. Mr. Lucas stated that this feels like an important hanging issue. Mr. Prideaux said the dome is not a structural element of the building. He said he proposed in March or April to do away with the dome. There is a complete roof; the dome is a facade for visual effect. If DSA came back and said we don’t approve it, the Board would be asked if they want to remove it or keep it with a letter in the file. Mr. Lucas asked who is paying all the costs for this and whether this was an architect cost. Mr. Prideaux said the costs will be minimal. Mr. Harold Lucas stated that he would think the architect would de-sign to the standards of the state because we paid for professional ser-vices. Mr. Prideaux said he didn’t think the issue was insurmount-able or terribly expensive. DSA is being difficult because they got hurt feelings because the engineer from Cincinnati, Ohio, told the DSA engineer to jump in the lake. Some of that is resolving itself. The architect is working hard on this.


4. FINAL REPORT ON HEALTH SCIENCES & UNIVERSITY CENTER(Continued)

Rayola Pratt asked if the District can get a final signoff on the project with that issue hanging. Dan Prideaux said no, DSA will not close the issue until this issue is resolved. Mr. Lucas said the Board has some personal liability here on the Field Act issue. Mrs. Hunn said she didn’t know about this. Mrs. Pratt said she knew about it. Gary Lewis said he didn’t know about it until last week. Mr. Prideaux said they had discussed the issue with Jack Briggs before Chuck Ely and then they brought Chuck Ely up to speed when he ar-rived. Mr. Pierson said it seems like we need to pressure the architects. Gary Lewis said he met with them two weeks ago. They were talk-ing with Jim Phillips who is the DSA inspector. He has been getting feedback from his superiors that this has been resolved but they want to teach the architect a lesson. We have changed manufacturers three times. George Estrada noted that DSA added a snow load on top of the load. Dan Prideaux said DSA has been a moving target all the way through this. We have excellent engineering on the dome right now. He said he thought they would hear on this within a week. Mr. Lucas said he wants to have this before the Board every meeting, month by month, until it is resolved. Mr. Pierson noted that all the contingency budget is there. Mr. Wyse said yes, but they borrowed another $300,000 for furniture. Rayola Pratt thanked Mr. Prideaux for a good report.

5. UPDATE ON WEAV-

ERVILLE EXTENDED EDUCATION SITE

Superintendent/President Gary Lewis recommended that this item be postponed until the Board’s December 12 meeting because this meet-ing was already running into the regular Board Meeting.

6.

ADJOURN

It was moved by Mr. Kendall Pierson, seconded by Mrs. Cheri Beck, and carried, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Mr. Harold Lucas, Chairperson of the Board’s Capital Outlay Com-mittee, adjourned the meeting at 7:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Susan Vanderwerf Recorder


MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES SHASTA-TEHAMA-TRINITY JOINT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2007

MINUTES The Board of Trustees of the Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District met in regu-lar session on Wednesday, November 14, 2007, in the Board Room of the Shasta College Admini-stration Building. 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mrs. Patricia Hunn,

Board Vice President, at 7:14 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Roll Call indicated the following:

Trustees Present Mrs. Cheri A. Beck Mrs. Judi D. Beck Mrs. Patricia A. Hunn Mr. Harold J. Lucas Mr. Kendall S. Pierson Mrs. Rayola B. Pratt Ms. Bonnie Wilson-Schmitt, Student Trustee Trustees Absent Mr. Martin B. Myers

3. FLAG SALUTE Mrs. Rayola Pratt led the flag salute for those attending the

Board Meeting. 4.

INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS

Superintendent/President Gary Lewis said he had no spe-cial guests to introduce at this time.

5. CALL FOR REQUESTS

FROM THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK TO ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA

Mrs. Hunn asked if there were any requests from the audi-ence to speak to any item on the agenda. President Lewis asked to speak to Item 8.1 on the Consent Agenda.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 2 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 14.

This item moved up: REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK TO ITEMS

Superintendent/President Gary Lewis said it had come to his attention that there were several people present who wished to address the Board regarding the Puente Pro-gram. He asked that the Board move Item 14 to this point in the meeting, so the visitors could address the Board. Mrs. Patricia Hunn explained the rules on speaking to the visitors. Candace Byrne introduced herself, saying she teaches English I at the Red Bluff Center. She also introduced Rosie Gilbert Ahrens as a Shasta College Counselor. Ms. Byrne said the Puente Program was suspended last year. This evening, they came with community members and students to discuss the program suspension. Ms. Byrne said the Puente Program is co-sponsored by the California Community College system and the University of California. It is designed as a transfer program for un-der represented students. It provides them with mentoring support in the community so they have a successful model. The program gives them counseling support through their time at Shasta College. They are followed by one coun-selor who works with them. The counselor and teacher team teach. Ms. Byrne said she can do so much more with that class because the cohort stays together and they can accelerate the coursework. Many students respond to the academic focus. Ms. Byrne said the Board’s goals speak to diversity and statewide goals speak to culturally diverse teaching. Ms. Byrne thanked the students and community members who came to support their mentors. Angelica Diaz said she was introduced to the Puente Pro-gram while she was in high school. Rosie Gilbert-Ahrens was her counselor. She asked what she wanted to do and from there she was paired with a mentor. Ms. Gilbert-Ahrens told her what classes she needed. Ms. Diaz said her sister was in the Puente Program also. Ms. Diaz added that she graduated last year from Shasta College with a major in business and she is going to Chico State. She pointed out her family.


This item moved up: REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK TO ITEMS (Continued)

Esmeralda Diaz said her mentor is always available and Puente is a really good program and very helpful. She said her parents don’t speak English and can’t fill out the pa-pers. Jose “Pep” Roa explained that he is a counselor at Red Bluff High School. He said he is a product of programs such as Puente. He works in the Upward Bound Talent Search program. Students need these kinds of programs. Puente means a bridge in Spanish. It bridges high school and college. Approximately 1.5% of their students are served and getting rid of the program kills this. Mr. Roa said they are also destroying what President Kennedy and President Johnson started and that is fighting poverty. President Gary Lewis stated that there has been no talk of doing away with the program. The District suspended the program. Sometimes you have to step back in order to step forward. For the first time the District has hired a bi-lingual counselor. The Administration feels it needs to look at the Puente Program and the services district-wide. They believe the services need to be district-wide and not just in Red Bluff. Enrollment has been falling off in Puente. The District is funded on enrollment - it is finan-cial. We now have new Marketing Director. We want to provide better programs. For the first time last year some of our radio advertising provided a Spanish version thanks to Brian Spillane’s wife. The rumor should not be that we are not serving this portion of our district. Mr. Roa commended the President and said more needs to be done. Mr. Lucas asked if the visitors could leave having some idea of the direction the District is headed. President Lewis said apparently there are communication issues. We have been talking about addressing this in the spring and strategizing for more enrollment. There is significant cost to operating the Puente Program. They don’t plan on meeting on this until January. Mr. Lewis said he has been in communication with the UC President’s office. We


This item moved up: REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK TO ITEMS (Continued)

have talked about enhancing all of our outreach, as shown by hiring a bilingual counselor. One of the young ladies said she speaks English but not her parents. It is valuable that now we have a counselor who can speak to their par-ents. Harold Lucas asked if they can leave with the feeling that it is back on line. Mr. Lewis said it will be bigger and bet-ter. Mr. Lucas asked if it would be back on line in the spring. Mr. Lewis said no, the Administration would let them know in the spring and aim for fall of 2008. The ear-liest it would be brought back would be fall 2008 and it might be a different program. They are looking for a pro-gram of all colors, not just Latinos, but all colors. Kendall Pierson said it seems like with the demographics that it takes recruiting at the high school level. If you say we are only serving 1.5% we should do better than that. Maria Rodriguez-Roa said she was a local therapist in the county. She asked how the college is marketing the pro-gram. Special populations need special marketing. If there is a task force because you mentioned improving the ef-forts to reach them, she would be interested in finding out how they are approaching it. There may be different methods. It is impressive that you used the radio – it is a good way to reach everyone. Ms. Rodriguez-Roa said she is also one of those statistics who had everything stacked against her and it was bridge program for her. She asked the Board to continue to expand their efforts so they don’t just reach 1.5%. She said she would like to be included on the Puente Task Force. Cheri Beck said she would encourage the group who are successful to spread the word. Pat Hunn said going to their high school and speaking to an assembly is very good. One of the students agreed because they feel espe-cially lost in high school.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 5 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 11.21 This item moved up:

PROPOSAL FOR PRO-FESSIONAL SERVICES WITH GE CONSULTING

Mr. Joe Wyse, Vice President of Administrative Services, said George Estrada has done a commendable job on the construction management of the Health Sciences and Uni-versity Center. He recommended approval, noting that the fee would not exceed $9,533. It was moved by Mr. Harold Lucas and seconded by Mrs. Cheri Beck TO AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR PROFES-SIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DISTRICT CON-STRUCTION PROJECTS AS PRESENTED, WITH GEORGE ESTRADA, dba GE Consulting. Mr. Kendall Pierson asked if they have an estimate of time, by project. Mr. Wyse said each project will be tracked separately and the hours will be spent on the high-est priority. Mr. Lewis said George Estrada would work on the theatre renovation, the Weaverville extended educa-tion site, Tehama College Center, library annex, and HVAC project. We will have to track it because account-ing for the library annex is different than the bond pro-jects. The motion carried. The Student Trustee advisory vote was affirmative.

11.22 This item moved up:

PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED CENTRAL PLANT RENOVATIONS

Mr. Joe Wyse said in order to proceed with the HVAC re-placement and use Trane as proposed, they must make sure the energy savings is enough to justify the project Mr. Mike Ketchum of Trane showed a PowerPoint presen-tation at this point. Mrs. Rayola Pratt said some agencies are picking up car-bon credits. She asked if Shasta College would get them. Mike Ketchum said he was familiar with those credits in renewable energy and he would look into. Mrs. Patricia Hunn declared the public hearing open at 7:40 p.m. She asked if there were any comments. There were none. Mrs. Hunn declared the public hearing closed.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 6 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 11.23 This item moved up:

DETERMINATION OF SUFFICIENT SAVINGS TO AUTHORIZE ENERGY SERVICES CONTRACT FOR CENTRAL PLANT RENOVATIONS

Mr. Wyse recommended approval. It was moved by Mr. Harold Lucas, seconded by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, and carried THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT SAVINGS TO AUTHORIZE AN ENERGY SERVICE CONTRACT UNDER CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 4210.10 ET. SEQ. The Student Trustee advisory vote was affirmative. Rayola Pratt complimented everyone on their great presen-tations.

11.24 This item moved up:

RESOLUTION AUTHOR-IZING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN CON-NECTION WITH LEASE-PURCHASE FINANCING

Joe Wyse noted that this was discussed at length in the Capital Outlay Committee Meeting. He recommended the Board adopt the resolution. Mr. Lucas said they had a Capital Outlay Committee meet-ing on this and talked it through thoroughly. They heard from bond counsel on cost and pay back. We have to do something but the money is also taking care of ADA is-sues and other areas. It was moved by Mr. Harold Lucas and seconded by Mr. Kendall Pierson TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AU-THORIZING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF LE-GAL DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH LEASE-PURCHASE FINANCING. Kendall Pierson noted that this is not to exceed $4 million. He encouraged the Administration to hone in as much as possible. There is no need to finance more than we need. The motion carried. The Student Trustee advisory vote was affirmative.

11.25

This item moved up: AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT FOR ENERGY MAN-AGEMENT SERVICES

Mr. Wyse recommended approval. Rayola Pratt asked how they will deal with change orders. Mr. Wyse said it will be very similar to the dorm work.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 7 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 11.25 AUTHORIZATION TO

ENTER INTO CONTRACT FOR ENERGY MAN-AGEMENT SERVICES (Continued)

This has a not-to-exceed price so if something comes up unexpected, Trane will have to pay the extra. Harold Lucas asked if Trane would be bonded to pay the extra. Mike Ketchum said yes. Mr. Lucas asked if they were bonded. Mr. Ketchum said yes. Rayola Pratt asked if our staff will be involved. Mr. Wyse said yes. Andy Brown and other staff will be involved. Gary Lewis added that they have been involved all along. Joe Wyse said in other contracts when there is a not-to-exceed amount, they keep the entire amount. Trane will not keep the amount over if they come in less. Mr. Ketchum of Trane said they have come in under budget before. Mike Ketchum said cooling is needed for the gym. If they are under significantly the District could apply the funds for the gym or other projects. It was moved by Mr. Kendall Pierson, seconded by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, and carried TO AUTHORIZE THE AD-MINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH TRANE NOT TO EXCEED $2,996,058 FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISTING HVAC UNITS. The Student Trustee advisory vote was affirmative.

6.1

FACULTY ASSOCIATION REPORT

Dean Munroe, Faculty Association President, stated that he would like to speak to Item 8.1.

6.2

ACADEMIC SENATE REPORT

Maureen Stephens, Academic Senate President, said last week, they sent two faculty members to the Statewide Academic Senate Plenary session - Ron Marley and Robb Lightfoot. Ms. Stephens distributed a one-page summary from Robb Lightfoot. She thanked the Board and Admini-stration for supporting faculty members to go to this. Pat Hunn thanked Ms. Stephens for the summary stating it was the first time the Board had received one.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 8 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 6.2 ACADEMIC SENATE

REPORT (Continued) Maureen Stephens added that Mr. Lightfoot posted several reports on the web site. The Senate will get a full report from him at their next meeting.

6.3 CLASSIFIED EMPLOY-

EES’ ASSOCIATION REPORT

Sandy Heisler, CSEA Chapter 381 President, stated that there was no report.

6.4

STUDENT SENATE REPORT

Bonnie Wilson-Schmitt, Student Senate President/Student Trustee, stated that they have been busy. The Christmas gift-giving program, Secret Santa, has started. The Student Senate is working with the Administration on the $1 student fee. Kevin Middleton and the Student Senate Vice President and Secretary all went to a General Assembly for Student Senates. Kevin facilitated two breakout sessions and did the Parliamentarian mike. Ms. Wilson-Schmitt said she was able to facilitate a break-out session. She proposed two resolutions and they passed. Angie Canny is the new Region 1 Secretary. The Shared Governance Luncheon was held and there was an excellent turnout and good feedback. The Student Senate held their Halloween costume contest and there was a good turnout. Keith Brookshaw and Student Senate members went to a conference in Sacramento. The main topics were the Brown Act and Roberts Rules of Orders. One Senate member went to a Leadership Conference at Butte Col-lege. Ms. Wilson-Schmitt said she went to a CAPED Confer-ence and attended a state level DSPS advisory committee meeting. They want her to do two breakout sessions next year.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 9 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 6.4 STUDENT SENATE

REPORT (Continued) On November 22, she was invited to join and attend a brain injury and military task force. There will be work-shops on returning veterans and programs to accommodate them. In October, the Senate had a chili cookoff. There was out-standing participation. As of this Friday, the Senate will have all of its officer po-sitions filled.

6.5

BOARD MEMBER REPORTS

Cheri Beck said she attended the Shared Governance Luncheon and she was thrilled to hear about our Student Senate being active throughout the state. It is very reputa-ble to be getting our name out there. Rayola Pratt thanked Tom Orr for a phone meeting she had with him. He asked for comments on the accreditation report. Tom wrote the distance learning portion of a report and it was very good. Mrs. Pratt said she appreciated that part of the report.

6.6

SUPERINTENDENT/ PRESIDENT’S REPORT

Gary A. Lewis, District Superintendent/President, wel-comed Bonnie Wilson-Schmitt to her first Board Meeting as Student Trustee and President of the Student Senate. Mr. Lewis said they spent a great deal of time during the last few months and weeks, preparing for the accreditation progress report visit. He met with Ron Manzoni and Irene Malmgren. Our visitors had many meetings while they were here. Mr. Lewis thanked all the people who contrib-uted directly or indirectly to the visit and process. Mr. Lewis said Ron Manzoni gave him an exit interview and it was extremely positive. He had marvelous things to say about the divisions and departments and our progress on the nine recommendations. In closing, he said “I’ve never seen an institution change so much in two years.” Mr. Lewis attributed this to all staff, faculty, the manage-ment team, and the Board for being supportive. It was a good way to go into the weekend. Mr. Lewis especially

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 10 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 6.6

SUPERINTENDENT/ PRESIDENT’S REPORT (Continued)

thanked Bill Cochran and Brad Banghart who are the Ac-creditation Co-Liaison Officer and put it all together. Mr. Lucas said it is also due in great part to the Superin-tendent/President and he thanked Gary Lewis.

6.7

REPORT ON CON-STRUCTION PROJECTS

Joe Wyse, Vice President for Administrative Services, said the paperwork on the library annex is going to the Chan-cellor’s Office tomorrow. It is exciting to be at the front end of this project. Mr. Wyse said he and Doug Meline, Tom Orr, and John Lutkemeier went to Sacramento and spent five hours meet-ing with staff at the Lionakis architectural firm. They worked through the details on the Tehama College Center. He thanked the group, especially Tom and John for look-ing at the drawings so all our needs will be met. Mr. Wyse said he signed the forms this morning for recirculation of the draft of EIR. On January 2 or 3 the public comment period will be over. In Weaverville, things are progressing well. They have the first designs for the covered walkways. Mr. Wyse said he would review all the details with the Board in Decem-ber at their Capital Outlay Committee.

6.8

REPORT ON GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND EXPENDITURES

Joe Wyse said he had no updates. He asked if the Board had any questions. There were no questions.

6.9 REPORT ON DISTRICT

FINANCIALS Joe Wyse explained the Interfund Transfer, which were

monies taken out of the general fund and put into lease revenue to make the payment. Mr. Wyse asked if there were any questions. There were no questions.

6.10 REPORT ON BUDGET TO

ACTUALS Mr. Joe Wyse said at 24.76 percent, we are right on target

because 25 percent is where we would expect to be at this time of year. Mr. Wyse said he believes we will come in under budget. Things like software licenses and insurance has already been paid for the year. Mr. Wyse asked if there were any questions. There were no questions.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 11 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 7.1 APPROVAL OF THE

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING HELD OCTO-BER 10, 2007

It was moved by Mr. Lucas and seconded by Mr. Pierson TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING HELD OCTOBER 10, 2007. Mrs. Cheri Beck said on Page 29, Paragraph 2, in Sentence 2, “office” should read “officer.” The motion carried. The Student Trustee advisory vote was affirmative.

8.

CONSENT/ACTION AGENDA

President Lewis recommended approval. President Gary Lewis said he wanted to recognize two people who he worked with for 29 and 30 years. Mr. Lewis said he worked with instructor Steve Concklin when he was overseeing the DSPS program. Mr. Lewis said he really valued his professionalism and valued him as a friend. Gary Lewis said Steve Concklin’s son ran track for him. He is recognized statewide for his efforts with the developmentally disabled. Steve Concklin will truly be missed. President Lewis said he values Karen Johnson’s friend-ship. She is a great person. He has known Ms. Johnson for 30 years and he can truly say she has been his friend for all those 30 years. She will really be missed in our Business Office. Mr. Lewis said he was sure that both of these excellent employees will truly enjoy their retirement. Dean Munroe, Faculty Association President, stated that Dr. Stephen Concklin has been an outstanding educator, mentor, and colleague. He has demonstrated the highest standards of performance, trust, and leadership. His quiet demeanor understates the dynamic impact and the signifi-cant influence he has had on his students and Shasta Col-lege.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 12 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 8. CONSENT/ACTION

AGENDA (Continued) President Lewis recommended approval. It was moved by Mr. Kendall Pierson, seconded by Mrs. Cheri Beck, and carried TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. The Student Trustee advisory vote was af-firmative.

9.1

RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION

Mrs. Hunn stated that the Board would recess to Closed Session regarding PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT (Govern-ment Code Section 54957) Title: District Superinten-dent/President. The Board recessed at 8:09 p.m.

Student Trustee Bonnie Wilson-Schmitt left the meeting at 8:11 p.m.

10.1 RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION

Mrs. Hunn reconvened the meeting at 8:19 p.m. She stated that there was a typographical error in the contract and Pat Demo has gone back to her office to correct it.

11.1 EMPLOYMENT AGREE-

MENT FOR DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT/ PRESIDENT

Pat Demo distributed copies to the Board and to President Lewis of the contract. Mrs. Hunn stated that the Board directed Pat Demo to update the contract to reflect the changes approved by the Board on October 10, 2007. In addition, the Board held a closed session to discuss changes. They do not have any changes other than those approved at the last Board meeting. It was moved by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, seconded by Mr. Harold Lucas, and carried to APPROVE THE AMENDED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DISTRICT SUPERINTEDENT/PRESIDENT, AS PRE-SENTED.

11.2 SETTING THE GOVERN-

ING BOARD’S ANNUAL ORGANIZATION MEET-ING DATE AND TIME

Mr. Lewis recommended approval. It was moved by Mr. Kendall Pierson, seconded by Mr. Harold Lucas, and carried TO SET ITS ANNUAL OR-GANIZATION MEETING FOR 7 P.M., WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2007, IN THE BOARD ROOM, AD-MINISTRATION 100 BUILDING, AT THE SHASTA COLLEGE CAMPUS, 11555 OLD OREGON TRAIL, REDDING, CALIFORNIA.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 13 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 11.3 CALLING THE ANNUAL

MEETING OF THE TRUS-TEES OF THE CHARITA-BLE TRUST UNDER THE IVY B. HORR REVOCA-BLE TRUST

Mr. Lewis recommended approval. It was moved by Mr. Harold Lucas, seconded by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, and carried TO SET THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE TRUSTEES OF THE IVY B. HORR CHARITABLE TRUST, TO BE HELD ON 6:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2007, IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE ADMINISTRATION BUILD-ING 100, AT THE SHASTA COLLEGE CAMPUS, 11555 OLD OREGON TRAIL, REDDING, CALIFOR-NIA.

11.4 RECOMMENDATION TO

SET BOARD MEETING DATE ON JANUARY 16, 2008, IN LIEU OF JANU-ARY 9, 2008

Mr. Lewis recommended approval. It was moved by Mrs. Cheri Beck, seconded by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, and carried TO SET THEIR BOARD MEETING DATE FOR JANUARY 16, 2008, IN LIEU OF JANUARY 9, 2008. Mr. Pierson said he may be out of town but hopes to make it back for the January 16 meeting.

11.5 FIRST READING OF RE-

VISED BOARD POLICY Gary Lewis said this is a first reading. The items are go-

ing through the shared governance process. The second reading will be at the December meeting. No action is needed.

11.6 APPOINTMENT OF CITI-

ZENS BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MEMBER

Gary recommended approval. It was moved by Mr. Harold Lucas, seconded by Mrs. Cheri Beck, and carried TO APPOINT BONNIE WIL-SON-SCHMITT AS THE STUDENT MEMBER OF THE CITIZENS’ BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.

11.7

ECONOMIC AND WORK-FORCE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION GRANT

Dr. Bill Cochran, Vice President of Academic Affairs, recommended approval. It was moved by Mrs. Cheri Beck, seconded by Mr. Har-old Lucas, and carried TO APPROVE THE APPLICA-TION FOR THE ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 14 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 11.7 ECONOMIC AND WORK-

FORCE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION GRANT (Continued)

DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION GRANT. Mr. Lewis said Brad Banghart and his team put this to-gether. This is a big application. This will put Shasta College at the forefront in the state of California. It is a tribute to Brad and what he has done over the last year and a half. Hopefully the District will be awarded the grant.

11.8 COMMUNITY-BASED

JOB TRAINING GRANT Dr. Cochran recommended approval.

It was moved by Mr. Harold Lucas, seconded by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, and carried TO APPROVE THE COM-MUNITY-BASED JOB TRAINING GRANT APPLI-CATION.

11.9 MOU WITH CSU, CHICO Dr. Cochran said this MOU is a two-year agreement for

the MBA program with CSU Chico. The program will be offered at our new Health Sciences and University Cen-ter. Last year it generated a little over $5,000. This year it will generate a little over $7,000. He recommended ap-proval. It is good to partner with CSU Chico and have them here, serving our community. He recommended ap-proval. It was moved by Mrs. Cheri Beck, seconded by Mrs. Rayola Pratt and carried TO APPROVE THE MOU WITH CSU, CHICO.

11.10 MOU WITH BUTTE

COLLEGE Dr. Cochran said the MOU allows Butte College to offer

its Respiratory Care Program in our District. He recom-mended approval. It was moved by Mrs. Cheri Beck, seconded by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, and carried TO APPROVE THE MOU WITH BUTTE COLLEGE, AS PRESENTED.

11.11

SOFTWARE LICENSING AGREEMENT WITH ANGEL LEARNING, INC.

Dr. Cochran said the college currently uses Web CT and that contract is expiring. Angel Learning, Inc. provides better service for our faculty and the college. This is a 3.5 year contract. It will be piloted this spring. It will cost a

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 15 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 11.11 SOFTWARE LICENSING

AGREEMENT WITH ANGEL LEARNING, INC. (Continued)

little over $13,000 for the spring. Mr. Pierson asked how it compares to the Web CT in cost. Doug Meline said the cost of the products are comparable. This 3.5 year agree-ment is less. Mrs. Pratt asked is this is a strong contract. Doug Meline said it is a better contract. The main benefit is the service level agreement that is higher than the ser-vice level agreement with Blackboard. Mrs. Cheri Beck said some of the Trustees from other colleges have men-tioned this program and they said nothing negative. It was moved by Mr. Kendall Pierson, seconded by Mrs. Cheri Beck, and carried. TO APPROVE THE SOFT-WARE LICENSING AGREEMENT WITH ANGEL LEARNING, INC., AS PRESENTED.

11.12 AGREEMENT WITH SAN

FRANCISCO COMMU-NITY COLLEGE DIS-TRICT FOR THE CALI-FORNIA EARLY CHILD-HOOD MENTOR PRO-GRAMS

Dr. Cochran recommended approval. It was moved by Mrs. Cheri Beck, seconded by Mr. Kendall Pierson, and carried TO RATIFY THE 2007-08 RENEWAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DISTRICT AND THE SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY COL-LEGE DISTRICT FOR THE CALIFORNIA EARLY CHILDHOOD MENTOR PROGRAM.

11.13 AGREEMENT FOR STU-

DENT CLINICAL EX-PERIENCE WITH NORTHERN VALLEY INDIAN HEALTH

Dr. Cochran said this two-year agreement is at no cost to the college. He recommended approval. It was moved by Mrs. Cheri Beck, seconded by Mr. Kendall Pierson, and carried TO APPROVE THE RE-NEWAL AGREEMENT WITH NORTHERN VALLEY INDIAN HEALTH FOR STUDENT CLINICAL EX-PERIENCE IN THE DENTAL HYGIENE PROGRAM.

11.14 MEMORANDUM OF

AGREEMENT WITH GARRISON ASSOCIATES TO ASSIST WITH THE PREPARATION OF NEW GEAR UP GRANT PRO-POSAL

Mr. Lewis said the District has used Bill Garrison in the past to prepare grants for Janis Marsh. It was moved by Mr. Harold Lucas, seconded by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, and carried TO APPROVE THE MOA WITH GARRISON ASSOCIATES TO ASSIST IN THE PREPARATION OF THE PROPOSAL FOR THE GEAR UP GRANT.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 16 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 11.15 CONTRACT SERVICES

FOR PHYSICIAN Mr. Lewis recommended approval.

It was moved by Mr. Harold Lucas, seconded by Mrs. Cheri Beck, and carried TO RATIFY THE RENEWAL AGREEMENT WITH DR. JULIAN FUENTES FOR THE 2007-08 ACADEMIC YEAR.

11.16 2007-08 GANN APPRO-

PRIATIONS LIMIT Mr. Wyse recommended approval.

It was moved by Mrs. Cheri Beck, seconded by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, and carried TO APPROVE THE 2007-08 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT OF $47,535,103.

11.17 RESOLUTION FOR

TRANSFER OF FUNDS Mr. Wyse recommended approval. The resolution is in

compliance with Title 5. It was moved by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, seconded by Mr. Harold Lucas, and carried TO ADOPT THE RESOLU-TION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO COVER BUDGET EXPENDITURES FOR THE 2006-07 FISCAL YEAR.

11.18 FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULED

MAINTENANCE PLAN Joe Wyse said the plan was due in December. He asked

if there were any questions or comments. It was moved by Mrs. Cheri Beck, seconded by Mr. Kendall Pierson, and carried, TO AUTHORIZE THE ADMINSITRATION TO SUBMIT THE FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE PLAN TO THE CHANCELLOR’S OFFICE, AS PROPOSED. Mrs. Pratt thanked Jim Taylor for his work on this report

11.19 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL

REPORT Mr. Wyse asked if there were any questions on the report.

There was a consensus of the group that agreed to ac-knowledge receipt of the 2007-08 first quarter financial status report.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 17 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 11.20 PROPOSAL TO REPLACE

BUS Vice President Joe Wyse said the District was presented

with an opportunity to buy a bus from a company which had been actually using it rather than going through a middleman. John Moore said the bus has 1997 VIN numbers but is listed as 1996. Mr. Pierson asked how the performance has been of the bus the college purchased in 2006. Mr. Moore said it is excellent, with no problems. Gary Lewis asked if the re-pair had been done so the bathroom on the bus could be used. Mr. Moore said that had not been accomplished yet. It was moved by Mr. Harold Lucas, seconded by Mrs. Rayola Pratt, and carried TO APPROVE THE PUR-CHASE OF ONE (1) REPLACEMENT BUS, AT A COST NOT TO EXCEED $90,000.

11.21 PROPOSAL FOR PRO-

FESSIONAL SERVICES WITH GE CONSULTING

This item was heard earlier in the meeting.

11.22 PUBLIC HEARING –

PROPOSED CENTRAL PLANT RENOVATIONS


11.23 DETERMINATION OF

SUFFICIENT SAVINGS TO AUTHORIZE ENERGY SERVICES CONTRACT FOR CENTRAL PLANT RENOVATIONS


11.24 RESOLUTION AUTHOR-

IZING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN CON-NECTION WITH LEASE-PURCHASE FINANCING


MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 18 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 11.25 AUTHORIZATION TO

ENTER INTO CONTRACT FOR ENERGY MAN-AGEMENT SERVICES


12.1 FUTURE BOARD MEET-

ING DATES Mrs. Hunn announced the future Board Meeting dates as:

November 28, 2007 (If Necessary)

December 12, 2007 (7:00 p.m. - Annual Organization Meeting)

December 26, 2007 (If Necessary) January 16, 2008 (In Lieu of January 9, 2008)

13.

COMMENTS FROM INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD

Kendall Pierson said he had a discussion with a young man whose wife is going to attend CSU Chico classes at our Health Sciences & University Center. They’ve just started a family and she is able to continue working to-ward her four-year degree because of our University Cen-ter being located here in Redding. This is a perfect ex-ample of people who couldn’t attend courses for a four-year degree otherwise. Mr. Pierson said he was pleased to hear that story. Cheri Beck said she visited a new business on Hilltop Drive. Mrs. Beck said she happened to have a folder on our SBDC. It was information on the incubator program. They really appreciated that. Rayola Pratt thanked everyone for the great presentations tonight and for all the work that went into it.

14. COMMENTS FROM THE

AUDIENCE Mrs. Hunn asked if there were any comments from the

audience. There were none. 15. DATE OF THE NEXT

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Mrs. Hunn announced the date of the next regular Board Meeting as Wednesday, December 12, 2007.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 19 - NOVEMBER 14, 2007 16. ADJOURN It was moved by Mrs. Cheri Beck, seconded by Mr. Ken-

dall Pierson, and carried TO ADJOURN THE MEET-ING. Board Vice President Patricia Hunn adjourned the meet-ing at 8:44 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Susan Vanderwerf Recorder

DMELINE

Typewritten Text

June

DMELINE

Typewritten Text

May

DMELINE

Typewritten Text

July

DMELINE

Typewritten Text

August

DMELINE

Typewritten Text

dm

dmeline

Typewritten Text

PGE-Incentive-SOLAR.pdf

Documents

HVAC Planning and TCO Analysis - Shasta College evidence/IIIB-037 HVAC... · HVAC Planning and TCO Analysis . The links below represent the evidence of TCO analysis and planning for