Humanitarian Emergency Response Review · clingingtotheroofofafloodedhome,wedon’tsomuchcommittohelp,asfeel ... not only a more compassionate world, but ... Investinginresiliencewillsavelivesandmoneyinthefuture

Humanitarian Emergency Response Review

28 March 2011

Chaired by Lord (Paddy) Ashdown

ForewordtotheHumanitarianEmergencyResponseReview

“The water started to rise, and it did not stop…the water was already so high and strong that I could not hold on to one of my children and the water swept her away.

Luckily someone was there to grab her.”

Gonaïves,OgèLéandre,Haiti2008

ThepeopleoftheUnitedKingdomknowwhywerespond,individuallyandasasociety,tohumanitarianemergenciesaroundtheworld.Theyunderstandthatwhenweareconfrontedbytheimageofachildtrappedintherubbleofanearthquake,orofafamilyclingingtotheroofofafloodedhome,wedon’tsomuchcommittohelp,asfeelcommittedtodoso;committedbyoursharedhumanity.

Itisbecausetheimpulsetorelievesufferingisrootedinmoralitythat our interventions to relieve suffering at times of disaster must always be driven by need and need alone. Nevertheless, the fact that Britain is prepared to play a full part (and often a leading part) as a member of the international community in order to relieve suffering at times of crisis makes for, not only a more compassionate world, but a safer one too – and that benefits all of us.

Whatiscrucialisthatwhenwedecidetoact,wedosoeffectively.Thefactthat,acrossthecountry,householdbudgetsareunderparticularstrainatthemoment,onlyunderlinesthepoint.Peoplewanttoknowthateverypoundtheygivewillbeapoundspentsavinglivesandlivelihoods.

InlookingatthewaytheUKgovernmentrespondstohumanitarianemergencies,thisReviewhasidentifiedmuchinwhichtheBritishpeoplecantakepride.TheDepartmentforInternationalDevelopment,asapolicymaker,afunderandadelivererofaid,hasbeenwidelypraisedforitsleadingrolewithintheinternationalhumanitariancommunity.

Butbeinggoodisnotgoingtobegoodenoughgiventhechallengesahead.Thescale,frequencyandseverityofrapidonsethumanitariandisasterswillcontinuetogrowinthecomingyears,andatanacceleratingpace.Expertspredictthatclimaterelateddisasterscouldaffect375millionpeopleeveryyearby2015,upfrom263millionin2010.

Thereasonsforthisaremany.Rapidpopulationgrowth,especiallyindisasterproneareas,isakeyfactor,especiallywhencombinedwithcontinuedmassurbanisation,muchofitunplannedandunsafe.Sotooarethechangesalreadyunderwayinsealevels,andinglobalrainfallandstormpatterns–changesthatwillcontributetosignificantadditionalpressureforfoodandwaterintheyearsahead.

Wearecaughtinaracebetweenthegrowingsizeofthehumanitarianchallenge,andourabilitytocope;betweenhumanityandcatastrophe.And,atpresent,thisisnotaracewearewinning.

Somerecentlyaffectedcountries,likeChinaandChilehavedemonstratedremarkableresilienceinthefaceofnaturaldisasters.EvenJapan,wherethetriplecatastrophehasledtotremendoussuffering,thingsmighthavebeenfarworsewithoutpreparation.Butothers,likeHaitiorPakistan,haveneededlargescaleoutsidehelpandwillcontinuetodoso.

Theabilityoftheinternationalhumanitariancommunitytoprovidethishelpisthreatenedbyanumberofproblems,somenew,somefamiliar.

HumanitarianEmergencyResponseReview

Thefirstistheglobaleconomiccrisis,whichcouldmakethealreadyslowergrowingcountriesoftheWestlessableorwillingtoprovideresourcesfordisasterrelief.Thisgapcouldbefilledbythefastergrowing‘emerging’worldeconomies,butthisisfarfromguaranteed.Thesecountriescurrentlycontributefarlesstodisasterrelief,andinanycasearelikelytoremainpreoccupiedwiththerelativelyhighlevelsofpovertywithintheirownborders.

Thesecondistherisingsecuritythreatfacedbyhumanitarianworkersontheground,andtheincreasingdifficultiestheyfaceinaccessingaffectedpopulations.Thetaskofprovidinghumanitarianassistanceimpartiallyandonthebasisofneedishugelycomplicatedbyconflict.Theneed,onoccasion,toworkalongsideorwithhostile–evenproscribed–groupsalreadypresentshumanitarianworkerswithanumberofmoralandpracticalproblems.Thesetooarelikelytogrowinnumberandcomplexity.

Regrettably,theleadership,managementandcoordinationoftheinternationalcommunity’seffortshavenotriseneventothechallengeswecurrentlyface.Unlessweradicallyimprovethequalityoftheleadershipoftheinternationaleffortinhumanitariancrises,wewillnotsucceedindealingwithwhatisahead.

Forallthesereasons,wehaveconcludedthatmerelyimprovinguponwhatwehavedoneinthepast–enhancingthestatusquo–willnotbesufficient.Wemustdevisenewwaystomeetthenewchallenges.

Thereareseventhreadstothisnewapproach.Theseformthestructureofthisdocument.

First,weneedtodevelopamoreanticipatoryapproach,usingsciencetohelpusbothpredict,andprepareforfuturedisastersandconflict.

Second,weneedtoplacethecreationofresilienceattheheartofourapproachbothtolonger-termdevelopmentandtoemergencyresponse.ThiswillrequireDFIDtomakehumanitarianresponseapartofitscoredevelopmentwork,engagingmorecloselywithlocalpeopleandinstitutionssoastostrengthenlocalcapacity.

Third,weneedsubstantiallytoimprovethestrategic,politicalandoperationalleadershipoftheinternationalhumanitariansystem.

Fourth,weneedtoinnovatetobecomemoreefficientandeffective.

Fifth,weneedtoincreasetransparencyandaccountabilitytowardsbothdonorandhostcountrypopulations.Farfrombeingburdensome,thisisinfactapreconditionfortheimprovementswewanttoseeintermsofvalueformoneyandimpact.

Sixth,weneedtocreatenewhumanitarianpartnershipstoallowDFIDbettertoinfluenceandworkwithinanincreasinglycomplexhumanitariansystem.Infuture,theeffectivenessofDFIDwilldependmoreonwhatitcandowithothers,thanonwhatitcandoalone.DFIDwillneedtoworkmorecloselywiththeemergingworldpowersandwiththeprivatesector,aswellaswiththemilitary.Inaddition,itwillneedtonurtureitsexistingpartnershipswiththeEU,theUS,otherdonors,theRedCrossandtheinternationalNGOs.

Finally,asemergenciesbecomebiggerandmorecomplex,soweneedtodefendandstrengthenthehumanitarian space.Thisreferstotheneedforhumanitarianworkerstobegrantedaccessandprotectionastheyseektoprovidehumanitarianassistanceinconflictaffectedareas.Thisinturnwillrequireustoreassertthecorehumanitarianprinciplesofhumanity,impartialityandneutrality;thepromisetoassistpeopleonthebasisofneed,regardlessoftheirgender,religion,ethnicityorpoliticalallegiance.

AsDFIDseekstomeetthesechallenges,itwillneed,ineverythingitdoes,tobecomeevenmoreinnovative,evenmoreofalearningorganisationthatisalwaysopenandwelcomingtonewideas.

ForewordtotheHumanitarianEmergencyResponseReview

IhavebeenprivilegedtochairthisindependentreviewandamgratefultoSecretaryofStateAndrewMitchell,notonlyforaskingmetodothis,butforenablingmetoworkwithaSeniorAdvisoryBoardwhosetalent,experienceandwisdomhascontributedsomuchtothiswork;withagiftedandcommittedteamofDFIDofficialswhohavesupportedusoutstandingly;andwithmyfriendoffortyyears,RossMountain,who,astheReview’sDirector,hasdrivenandsteeredusthroughoutthesevenmonthsofthereviewprocess.

DFIDenjoysapositionofrespectandleadershipintheinternationalcommunityfortheworkthatithasdoneinthepastandstilldoestoday.ItisourhopethatthisreportwillassistDFIDtomaintainthatpositionofinternationalleadershipinthefaceofthechallengesthatlieahead.

Lord (Paddy) Ashdown, Chair HumanitarianEmergencyResponseReview

Director:RossMountainSeniorAdvisoryBoardMembers:AndyBearpark;BarneyMayhew;CarolynMiller;DavidBryer;ElisabethRasmusson;GilbertGreenall;GordonConway;JodaSilva;MarkBowden;NiciDahrendorf;RandolphKent;SimonMaxwell;SteffenStenberg;SueWardell;YaseminAysan.

ExecutiveSummary

ExecutiveSummaryThereviewcomesatatimewhenthehumanitariancommunityfacesanumberofdauntingchallenges.Disastersareincreasing,asarethenumbersofpeopleaffectedbythem.ThesearesetoutstarklyintheChair’sforewordandinthereportitself.

TheUKisamajorcontributorinhumanitariancrises,andishighlyrespectedforitsrole.SomeofthebestknownhumanitarianorganisationsareUKbased,andtheBritishpublicgivesgenerouslyinappeals.TheUKgovernmenthasbeenthesecondlargestbilateraldonorforhumanitarianreliefinrecentyears,aftertheUS.

ThisreviewhasfoundthattheUKDepartmentforInternationalDevelopment(DFID),themainconduitthroughwhichthegovernmentresponds,isalsowellrespectedandwellregarded.Ithasexcellenthumanitarianstaff,andhasplayedapositiveroleinimprovinginternationalresponse.Nevertheless,thereviewhasalsoconcludedthatinlightofthepotentialneedinyearstocome,therewillhavetobeastepchangeinthewayDFIDresponds.Thereviewmakesaseriesofhighlevelpolicy,andsomedowntoearthpractical,recommendationsintendedtobringthischangeabout.

Anticipation

If we are to meet the challenges ahead, we have to be “ahead of the curve” rather than always behind; preparing for disasters, as well as reacting to them.

Itisinthenatureofdisastersandconflictthattheycannotbepreciselypredicted.Butwecanbemoreanticipatoryinourapproach.Hurricaneseasonsarewellknown,asareearthquakefaultlines.Droughtscanbequicklyidentified.Climatescienceisimprovingallthetime.Politicalinstabilityandtheconflictitcanleadtoarereportedearly.Buttheseearlywarningsandpredictableeventsareoftennotactedoninadvance,orquicklyenoughwhentheyarehappening.Partoftheanswerisbetterpresentationofthescienceforbetterdecisionmaking.Partoftheanswerisfordecisionmakerstoactonthisinformation.Devolvingdecisionmakingtothoseclosesttoeventsisanotherpart,includingequippingatriskgovernmentsandcivilsocietywiththemeanstoact.

Resilience

The more resilient a nation, the less lasting damage disasters cause and the quicker they can recover.Resilienceisaboutbeingpreparedfordisasters,andhavinggoodsystemsforrespondingtothem.Itisaboutinvestingininfrastructure,likebuildinghousesandhospitalsthatcanwithstandearthquakes,orschoolsthatdoubleupascycloneshelters.Butitisalsoaboutinvestinginhumancapacity;strengtheningagovernment’scapacitytorespond;creatingdisastermanagementstructuresandplans;givingpeoplesupportbeforedroughtforcesthemtosellalltheirpossessions.Itisabouteconomicplanningthatrecognisesdisasterscanhappenandmakesprovisionforthem.

Wheregovernmentsarecapableofbuildingresilience,thentheUK,throughDFIDshouldhelpthemtodoso.ThisshouldbeacorepartofDFIDdevelopmentworkincountriesthatareatrisk,whichisthemajorityofthe27inwhichDFIDnowworksbilaterally.Investinginresiliencewillsavelivesandmoneyinthefuture.Mozambiqueaskedtheinternationalcommunityfor£2millionin2006tohelpprepareforthefloods,anamountitcouldnotsecure.Afterthefloodstheinternationalsystemspent£60millionresponding.


Leadership

Wheregovernmentsarenotabletorespondtodisastersorinconflictsituationstheyneedastronginternationalsystemtohelpout.Buttoooftentheinternationalsystemfailsthem.CasestudiesforthisreviewinHaitiandPakistanmakethisdepressinglyclear.TheUNistheonlylegitimateauthoritythatcanleadbutisoftentooweakandslowtodoso.

Changeisneededatthestrategicandtheoperationallevels.The UN needs to invest in a leadership cadre and ensure its best people are deployed quickly to the biggest and most complex disasters.Theseleadersneedthesupportoftheirheadquartersandtheagenciesthatdothemajorityofthework.Thesameistrueoftechnicalleadership–the‘clusters’.Theseneeddedicatedleadershipinthebiggestemergenciesandtheyneedtobestrategic,decision-makingbodieswithnationalandlocalgroupsfullyintegrated.Linesofauthorityneedtobeclearer,andwherenecessary,institutionalchangesshouldbemadetomakethemso.Overallthelevelofprofessionalisminthehumanitariansectorneedstoberaisedthroughbetterinvestmentinskillsandtraining.

TheUKhasbeenastrongproponentofchangeintheinternationalsystemtodate,andcanhelppushthisnewagenda.AlreadytheheadsofthemajorUNagencies,ledbytheUNEmergencyReliefCoordinator(ERC),arepushingtheseideas.DFID should encourage and support further reform, and work with others to deliver the change needed to face future challenges.

Innovation

Whenitcomestosavinglivesinanemergencyweneedtobeasefficientandeffectiveaswecan.Oneofthewaysthiscanbeachievedisthroughgreateruseofnewtechnologiesandnewpractices,harnessingthebestofnewscience,newprocessesandthenewideasfromthoseaffected.

Thehumanitariansectorhasbeenslowtochange.Newapproachessuchasgivingpeoplecash(insteadofbuyingthemblanketstheymaynotneed)havetakenyearstogotoscale.InPakistan,satelliteimagerywasavailabletostrategicplanners,butnottothoserespondingontheground.Intractableproblemssuchasthetimelyprovisionofshelterremainachallenge.Whilsttherehavebeenafewsuccesses,suchasinnutritionwherenewfoodproductshaveprovenrevolutionary,thesehavebeendrivenbycommittedindividualsusuallywithoutsupport.

DFIDhasagoodtrackrecordinsupportinginnovation.Ithasprovidedstartupfundingformanynewinitiatives,andcontinuestoseeksolutionstoproblemslikeshelter.Ithelpedsetupanewinnovationsfund,withotherdonorsandNGOs.Thisworkneedstobeaccelerated,andnewinnovationsneedtobetakentoscalefaster.Crucially, there is a need for more investment in research and evidence, as well as new ways of working.

Accountability

Humanitarianaidhelpsmillionsofpeoplearoundtheworldeachyear.TheNigercasestudyforthisreviewalonemakesclearthattensofthousandsofchildrenweresavedfromstarvationthroughpromptaction,withDFIDfundingplayingameaningfulpart.Butthereisanaccountabilitydeficit.Thepeoplewhoareonthereceivingendofourassistancearerarelyifeverconsultedonwhattheyneed,orabletochoosewhohelpsthemorhow.This means that gender based issues and the needs of the vulnerable are too often overlooked.Whilstthishaslongbeenrecognisedasanissue,toolittlehasbeendoneaboutit.

ExecutiveSummary

Understandingtheimpactofhumanitarianassistanceisanotherareawheremuchworkisneeded.Thisisconnectedtotheaccountabilityissue;thosewhodeliverhumanitarianaidcanonlyunderstandtheirimpactiftheyunderstandwhatpeopleneed.DFIDcanhelpwithmeasuringimpactandmakingthosewhodeliverhumanitarianaidmoreaccountable. Linking impact measurement and accountability better to the funds agencies receive is a key recommendation of this review.

Humanitarian agencies should also be more accountable to donors, be they governments or the public.Donorshavearighttoknowhow–andhowwell–theirmoneyisspent.

Partnership

TheUKisnotalargedirectproviderofhumanitarianassistance,preferringinsteadtoworkwithandthroughpartners.The review endorses this approach; partnership will become even more important as the world becomes more interconnected, as power shifts towards the newly emerging economies, and as greater challenges require more capacity.

The UK should remain a committed multilateralist in its approach.Workingwithpartnersinothernations,withtheUnitedNationsandwithcivilsocietyorganisationsmakessense.Itcombinesscarceresourcesforthebesteffect.

ManyofthepartnersDFIDworkswithinhumanitarianresponseareworld-classorganisations.Nevertheless,thehumanitariansectorinrecentyearshasbeenseenbymanyasa‘closedshop’withahandfulofagenciesanddonorsdominating.Whilstthiscanbeexplained(partlybytheneedfororganisationstobeseenasneutralandimpartial)thesystemdoesneedtochange.This review concludes that DFID needs to become more of a ‘network enabler’, working with existing partners but also developing new and dynamic partnerships with emerging nations, NGOs, the private sector, faith groups and the diasporas.

Humanitarian space

Inconflictzonesorfailedstates,DFIDoftencannotworkdirectlythroughtheauthorities.Insuchcasesthereisafragile‘space’intowhichhumanitarianagenciesareadmittedtohelpthosemostinneed.Theyareonly‘allowed’in,however,whentheyareviewedasgenuinelyimpartial.Whereaidislinkedtopoliticalormilitarygoals,accesscanbedeniedandthesecurityofstaffcompromised,makingitdifficulttoreachthosemostinneed.Hencetheimportanceofthekeyhumanitarianprinciplesofhumanity,neutralityandimpartiality.

The review concludes that DFID humanitarian policy should be to support, defend and where possible enlarge this fragile space; to work with agencies that can access and help those in dire need, and not to politicise humanitarian aid.Thereviewalsorecognisesthatincomplexconflicts,andinsituationswheretheauthorityofthestatehasbrokendowntherewillbetimeswhenmilitaryforce,mandatedbytheUN,willbeneededtoprotectciviliansandhumanitarianworkers.Insuchcases,creatingasecureenvironmentbothfortheciviliansandfortheconductofhumanitarianworkcanoftenbeafirstpriority.

Delivering transformational change in DFID

Todeliverastepchangeinthewayhumanitarianassistanceisconceivedanddelivered,DFIDwillhavetomakesignificantchanges.ThemostradicalchangewillinvolveseeinghumanitarianconcernsasacorepartofDFIDprogramming,ratherthansomethingthat


needstoberespondedtowhenithappens.There should be a closer, more integrated relationship between DFID’s core development work and the way DFID responds to meet rapid onset emergencies.SuchworkshouldalsobeofcentralconcerntoDFID’sdevelopmentpartners,suchastheWorldBankandtheUN.

DFIDshouldactivelysupporttheUNinitseffortstoreformitshumanitarianleadership.FundingformultilateralandNGOpartnersneedstobecomemorepredictable,sothattheycaninvestintheskillsandstructurestheyneedtobebetterprepared.Thereisaneedforfastandflexiblefundingforthe‘criticalperiod’immediatelyafterahumanitarianemergencyhashappened.Fundingshouldalsobeavailabledirectlytogovernmentsforresilienceandresponsework,wheretheyarecapable,willingandtransparent.

To introduce a new dynamism into the humanitarian sector DFID needs to reach out to new partners. It needs to work better with new donors and the private sector. It needs to promote innovation and bring new innovations and processes to scale faster. It needs to put the measurement of impact at the heart of its work, and demand accountability and transparency of itself and its partners. It needs to seek value for money, not crudely through comparing costs but through focusing on achieving the best outcomes for affected people and improving the quality of future decision making. It needs to drive radical change, for instance in the supply chain. It needs to improve the way it provides leadership and coordination across the UK government when responding to humanitarian emergencies. Finally, it must become better at communicating what it does, both to those who provide the money, and to those who are the beneficiaries of it.

TableofContents

TableofContents

1. Introduction 1

Howthereportisorganised 1

Howthereviewwasconducted 2

2. The international humanitarian system 3

DFID:Aleadingactorinhumanitarianresponse 5

3. Challenges 9

Increasingdisasterrisk:themajortrends,threats,andprobabilities 9

Respondingtoincreasedneed 12

4. Findings 13

4.1 Anticipation 13

4.2 Resilience 15

Embeddingresiliencewithindevelopmentprogrammes 16

Regional,nationalandlocalcapacities 18

Innovativefundingmodelsforrisktransfer 18

4.3 Leadership 19

Strategicleadership 20

Operationalleadership 20

Humanresourcecapacities 21

4.4 Innovation 23

Cashbasedapproaches 24

Shelter 25

Technology 25

4.5 Accountability 26

Impact 27

Addressingtheneedsofthemostvulnerable 29

Gender 29

4.6 Partnership 30

WorkingwiththeUnitedNationsanditsagencies 30

WorkingwiththeEuropeanUnion 31

Workingwithbi-lateraldonors 32

Workingwithnewdonorpartners 32

WorkingwithNGOs 33

WorkingwiththeRedCrossandRedCrescentMovement 35

Workingwiththeprivatesector 36

Workingwiththemilitary 38

4.7 Humanitarian space 40

Protectionofcivilians 40

Securityofhumanitarianworkers 41


5. Delivering transformational change in DFID 42

5.1 Changing the policy 42

5.2 Delivering differently 43

ShapingtheInternationalSystem 43

Changingthefundingmodel 44

Fastmobilisationfundingandpre-crisisarrangements 45

Fundingrecoveryfromdayone 46

Deliveringsmarterdirectaid 46

WorkingstrategicallyacrosstheUKgovernment 47

5.3 Changing the structure, shifting resources 49

Managingtheresponse 50

Managingrisk 50

5.4 Driving results and value for money 51

Outcomesandeffectiveness 53

Outputsandefficiency 53

Inputsandeconomy 54

Theglobalsupplychain 54

5.5 Getting the message across 55

6. Recommendations 58

1

Introduction

1. IntroductionThisindependentreviewintohowtheUKrespondstohumanitarianemergencieswascommissionedbytheSecretaryofStateforInternationalDevelopmentandledbyLordPaddyAshdown.ItwasaskedtoconsiderhowtheUKshouldbestrespondtohumanitarianemergenciesoverseas,andtheroletheUKshouldplayintheinternationalhumanitariansystem.

TheUKisconsideredoneoftheleadingnationsinhumanitarianresponse.Inrecentyearsithasbeenthesecondlargestbilateralhumanitariandonorglobally,andiswidelyregardedinternationally.TheUKisastrongsupporterofthemultilateralsystem,providessignificantfundingandconsistentlyprovidesexperiencedstaffandreliefitemstosupporttheresponseinmajoremergencies.

TheBritishpublicexpectstheUKtobeamajorhumanitarianresponder.TheBritishpublicitselfgivesgenerouslytoemergencyappeals.InJanuary2010,theDisastersEmergencyCommittee(DEC)AppealforHaitiraised£101millionfromthepublic.Theresponsewasespeciallynotableatatimeofglobaleconomiccrisis.

ThisreviewofhowtheUKcarriesoutitshumanitarianresponseworkcomesatamomentofreflectionfortheinternationalsystem.AsthehorrendouseventsunfoldinJapanandoverayearaftertheHaitiearthquakeandsixmonthsafterdevastatingfloodsinPakistan,manyofthoseinchargeofmajoraidagenciesarewonderinghowtomeetthechallengesofthefuture.Italsocomesatatimeofchange forDFID,whichhasrecentlypublishedthefindingsofitsBilateralandMultilateralAidReviews.

Thereviewisforwardlooking.ItisnotanevaluationofDFID’sworkinemergenciestodate.Rather,thereviewnoteswherepastresponsehasbeenmosteffectiveandlooksforwaystoenhancewhathasbeendonewell.ItaimstobuildontheUK’sstrengths.Thescopeofthereviewdoesnotcoverlong-termchronichumanitariancrises.Itfocusesonsuddenonsetdisastersor‘spikes’inconflictsituations,butmanyoftherecommendationswillalsoapplytochronicsituations.

CreatingthebestUKresponsewillonlygopartofthewaytowardsimprovingthewholesystem.ThereviewlooksatthewaytheUKcanworkwithotherinternationalbodiesandUNagenciesinemergencysituationstoensurethattheglobalresponsetodisastersimproves.TheUKmustworktoinfluencetheglobalsystemifrealimprovementsaretohappen.

TheUKworksthroughandwithpartners.Workinginpartnershipisabigpartofthereviewandtheproposedfutureapproach.ThereviewsetsoutwhereDFIDcandeepenthesepartnershipsandhow.ItalsolookstonewpartnershipsandhowDFIDcanworkbestwithintheUKgovernment.

How the report is organised

Thereportislaidoutinsixsections.Thisintroductionisfollowedbysectiontwo,whichbrieflydescribestheinternationalhumanitariansystemandDFID’sroleinit.Thethirdsectionlooksatpotentialfuturehumanitarianchallengesandthecapacitiestherearetocopewiththese.Sectionfoursetsoutthefindingsofthereview.Thereview’sconclusionsonhowDFIDshouldpositionitselfinordertomeetthefuturechallengesareoutlinedinsectionfive.Sectionsixliststherecommendations.

2


How the review was conducted

ThereviewwaschairedbyLordPaddyAshdownandwasentirelyindependentinnature.ASeniorAdvisoryBoard(SAB)of15metonamonthlybasisthroughoutthereviewperiodtosteerthedirectionofthereview,examinematerialandsetoutthemainthemesandrecommendations.Theadvisoryboardservedinapersonalcapacity,butrepresentedthroughtheirexperiencethemajorinstitutionsandtraditionsinvolvedinhumanitarianresponse.

Asmallreviewteamcarriedoutconsultations,literaturereviewandpreparedmaterialfortheboard.Anindependentdirectorwasappointedtoheadtheteam.

3

Theinternationalhumanitariansystem

2. TheinternationalhumanitariansystemD

ON

OR

SD

ELIV

ERY

AG

ENC

IES

Affected population

Local NGOs

$*

International militaryorganisations

$*

NationalPrivate Sector

$*

International Private Sector

$*

International NGOs

$5.7bn

UN agencies funds and organisations

$7.8bnAffected countrygovernments

$*

Local communitiesand organisations

$*

Red Cross [ICRC, IFRC, National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies]

$1.536bn

Governments

$4.1bn

Privatecontributions$12.8bn

Figure1: The international humanitarian system. Data included from the Global Humanitarian Assistance Report 2010. (*Amountsunknown)

Theformalinternationalhumanitariansystemismadeupofproviders(donorgovernments,foundationsandindividualgivers)andtheimplementers(RedCrossandRedCrescentMovement,NGOs,UNAgenciesandIOMandnationalandregionalNGOsandcivilsociety).Anumberofkeyactorsalsoofimportancearestillseentobeoutsidetheformalsystem,namelyaffectedgovernments,themilitary,andbusinesses.Remittanceflowsarealsonotcapturedbytheformalsystem.Thechartaboveshowsthemaincomponentsofthesystem.

Theinternationalhumanitariansystemrespondstohumanitarianemergencieswherethereisanappealforinternationalassistance,orinextremecaseswheredirectedbytheUN.ThelegalframeworkforaninternationalhumanitarianemergencyresponseissetoutinInternationalHumanitarianLaw,HumanRightsLaw,RefugeeLawandUNResolutions.

4


Theselegalnormsestablishthathumanitarianaidshouldbeguidedbytheprinciplesof:

i. Humanity–thecentralityofsavinglivesandalleviatingsufferingwhereveritisfound.

ii. Impartiality–humanitarianaidshouldbeimplementedsolelyonthebasisofneed,withoutdiscriminationbetweenorwithinaffectedpopulations.

iii. Neutrality–humanitarianactionmustnotfavouranysideinanarmedconflictorotherdispute.

iv. Independence–humanitarianobjectivesareautonomousfrompolitical,economic,militaryobjectivesorotherinterestsrelatedtothelocationwhereassistanceisprovided.

Theinternationalhumanitariansystemhasgrownrapidlyoverrecentyearsandthereisoftenalackofclarityastowhatthetermactuallyreferstoandwhereitsboundarieslie.Themaindeliveryactorsfallintothree‘pillars’:theUNanditsspecialisedagencies;theRedCrossandRedCrescentMovement;andNon-GovernmentOrganisations(NGOs).Governments,nationalandlocalinstitutionsinaffectednationstypicallyleadtheresponseandprovidemuchoftheassistance,withtheinternationalsysteminsupport.Inrecentyears,internationalmilitaryforcesandlargeprivatecorporationshaveincreasinglybecomeaidproviders,asthisreportexplores.

Theinternationalsystemisfinancedbygovernmentdonors(ofwhichtheUKisasignificantone)andprivatecontributions.Figuresfortotalinternationalhumanitarianresourcesvarydependingonthesource.Althoughfundingtotheinternationalhumanitariansystemhasincreasedfasterthantherateofofficialdevelopmentassistance(ODA)inrecentyears,thelatestGlobalHumanitarianAssistance(GHA)reportclaimsthathumanitarianaidfellby11%from2008($16.9billion)to2009($15.1billion).

Therangeofactivitiesundertakenbytheinternationalhumanitariansystemhasalsoexpanded.Thecorehumanitarianactivitiesremain:healthservices;waterandsanitation;foodsecurity;nutritionandfoodaidandshelter.However,manyhumanitarianoperationsnowincludeawiderangeofotheractivities,including:protection;education;agriculture;mentalhealthsupport;incomegeneration;infrastructurerehabilitation;humanrightsadvocacyandsupporttothere-establishmentoftheruleoflaw1.

Thetotalnumberofstaffworkingfortheinternationalhumanitariansystemisestimatedat210,800(mostlynationalsintheirowncountry).ItismadeupofUNagenciesandtheIOM(49,500),theRedCross/CrescentMovement(48,400)andNGOs(112,900).Aidworkerpopulationhasincreasedby6%yearonyearoverthelast10years2.

Inconflictsituationsthereistypicallyapeaceandsecuritydimensiontohumanitarianemergencies.InsuchcasesothermultilateralmechanismsandinstitutionsarealsoinvolvedsuchastheUNSecurityCouncil,whichdetermineswhenandwhereaUNPeacekeeping(DPKO)operationshouldbedeployed.

1 Stoddard(2008).2 ALNAP,(2010).TheStateoftheHumanitarianSystem.

5


DFID: A leading actor in humanitarian response

TheUK,throughitsDepartmentforInternationalDevelopmentisthesecondlargestbilateralglobalhumanitariandonor.The2002InternationalDevelopmentActprovidesthelegalbasisforDFID’sresponsetohumanitarianemergencies.ItgivestheSecretaryofStateforInternationalDevelopmentpowerstoprovidehumanitarianassistance,withthesolepurposeto“alleviatetheeffectsofanaturalorman-madedisasterorotheremergency”outsidetheUK.Latterly,theUKhasalsosignedtheEUconsensusonhumanitarianaidthatenshrinestheprinciplesoutlinedabove.Asadonor,theUKhasalsosigneduptothePrinciplesandPracticeofGoodHumanitarianDonorship.DFIDdelivershumanitarianassistanceinfourdistinctways:

1. DFID shapes the humanitarian system

AsasignificantUNmemberstateandalargedonortotheinternationalsystem,theUK(throughDFID)workswithUNagenciestodelivereffectivelyandimproveperformance.DFIDcontributescorefundingtotheUN,aswellasadditionalfundinginbigemergencies.Institutionalstrategicpartnershipshavebeenformedaroundthiscorefunding,allowingDFIDandtheUNtosetlong-termgoals.

In2009/10totalDFIDhumanitarianspendwassplitasshowninthefigurebelow.3Inseveralsuddenonsetemergenciesresearchedaspartofthisreview,theUNcomponentwassignificantlysmaller,closerto40%withlargerpercentagesgoingdirectlytoNGOsandtheRedCross/CrescentMovement.Exceptionally,inthecaseoftheHaitiearthquake,morethan50%wentondirectexpenditure.

UN 53.2%

ECHO 18.9%

Humanitarian Consultancy 0.9%

Red Cross 13.5%

NGO 11.1%

DFID Direct Contribution 1.9%

Government 0.6%

Figure2: Percentage of DFID’s humanitarian spend by agency type 2009/10.

3 AdaptedfromDFID,“DFID’sExpenditureonHumanitarianAssistance2009/10”.AccordingtotheGHAReport201014donorsspentover60%oftheirhumanitarianaidthroughmultilateralagencies.

6


In2005DFIDsupporteda‘humanitarianreform’processthatsoughtmorepredictableresponse.Thereformscalledformajorchangesinfunding,leadershipandcoordinationofhumanitarianemergencies.Asaresult,DFIDhasworkedtoenlargetheCentralEmergencyResponseFund(CERF)andcreatecountrypooledfunds,whichhelpUNagenciesrespondrapidlytoemergencies.TheUKhasbeenthelargestdonortotheCERF–morethan$420milliontodate–andtocountrypooledfundingmechanisms.Aswellasleadingbyexample,DFIDworkstoinfluenceothermemberstatestoincreasecontributionstotheCERF.In2006therewere52countrydonorstotheCERF.By2010thatfigurehadrisento82countries.

DFIDalsosupportedtheestablishmentofthe‘cluster’approach4,anewcoordinationmechanismthatmadeagenciesresponsibleforparticularareaslikeshelterorhealth.DFIDfundedglobalclusterappealstosetthesystemupandhascontinuedtopushagenciestodeploypeopletoleadthese.Throughitsfunding,DFIDcontinuestoplayaninfluencingroleencouragingclusterleadagenciestoviewhumanitarianleadershipandco-ordinationactivitiesaspartoftheircorework.

2. DFID funds humanitarian aid agencies and is the second largest bilateral donor after the US Government

In2009/10DFIDspentabout£528milliononhumanitarianassistance.About£100millionofthiswentthroughtheEuropeanCommunityHumanitarianOffice(ECHO),theEU’sfundforemergencies.ECHOthenspentthismoneythroughUNagencies,theRedCrossandNGOs.AlargeproportionofthefundsspentthroughtheUNwerechannelledtoimplementingNGOs.

11%wentonrapidonsetfundingforhumanitarianemergencies.TheremainderonprotractedcrisessuchasDRCongoorSudan.TheoneoffamountsthatDFIDspendsonrapidonsetemergencies,however,changesignificantlydependingonthecontext.In2010/11DFIDspent£134milliononrespondingtothefloodsinPakistanalone.

SeveralmillionpoundseachofcorefundingwenttoallofthebigUNagenciesinvolvedinemergenciesandtheRedCross/RedCrescent.TheannualcontributiontotheCERFconstitutedabout10%ofDFID’snon-ECHOhumanitarianspend.

ECHOwasthebiggestrecipientofUKaidatabout£100millionin2009/10,followedbytheICRCat£66million,andthenOCHA(includingCERF),WFP,UNDPandUNICEF(seefigure3onpage75).

4 Seewww.humanitarianreform.org/humanitarianreform/Default.aspx?tabid=53forafulllistofclusters.

5 AdaptedfromDFID:“DFID’sexpenditureonhumanitarianassistance2009/10”.

7


ECHO

ICRC

OCHAW

FP

UNDP

UNICEF

UNDP/OCHA

UNHCRW

HO

Save

the C

hildr

en

£0

£20

£40

£60

£80

£100M

illio

ns

Figure3: UK contributions 2009/10.

Inabsoluteterms,theUKhasbeenthesecondlargestbilateralhumanitariandonoraftertheUS.Asapercentageofnationalincome(GNI)however,theUKcomesafterSaudiArabia,Kuwait,Denmark,Ireland,Sweden,Luxembourgandsomeothers.

3. DFID is also on a small scale a direct deliverer of aid, providing goods in kind, Search and Rescue (SAR) capabilities, and supporting secondments where appropriate

HavingadirectresponsecapabilityallowsDFIDtostrengthenandinfluencetheinternationalhumanitariansystem.In2009/10DFID’sin-kindgoodsorpersonnelsupportamountedto£7million.DFIDhasastandbyarrangementwiththeUKfireservicetodeploysearchandrescueteamsaftermajorearthquakes.Italsohasitsownstanding‘operationsteam’(CHASEOT)thatcandeployrapidlytoemergenciesandrunsalldirectdeliveryfromLondon.Theoperationsteamisonstandby24/7andisacontractedoutfacility,currentlymanagedbyCrownAgents.Ithasstandbyarrangementswithairfreightcontractorsandcandeployrapidlynichecapabilitieslikeairporthandling.ItprovidesexpertpersonneltotheUnitedNationsonrequestandassemblesteamsspeedilyforDFID.

InthecaseoftheHaitiearthquakeresponseover50%oftheexpenditurewasspentdirectly,asoutlinedbyfigure4onpage8.

8


CHASE OTGovernment advisor

Stabilisation Unit (SU)

Security

UN secondees

In kind

Search and Rescue (SAR)

MOD

Air brokers

Figure4: Percentage allocations of DFID’s direct spend on the Haiti earthquake response.

4. DFID leads the HMG response to humanitarian emergencies

DFIDworkswithotherWhitehalldepartments,principallytheFCO,MODandCabinetOfficetocoordinatetheUKresponsetoahumanitarianemergency.DFIDleadsonmakingthehumanitariancase.DecisionsonwhethertodeployUKmilitarycapabilitiesaretakenonacase-by-casebasis.

9

Challenges

3. Challenges

Increasing disaster risk: the major trends, threats, and probabilities

Allcurrenttrendssuggestthatmorepeople–particularlyindevelopingcountries–willbeaffectedbyhumanitarianemergenciesinthecomingdecades.Notonlywilltheybecomemorefrequent,theywillalsobeincreasinglyunpredictableandcomplex.

Lastyear,263millionpeoplewereaffectedbydisasters–110millionmorethanin2004,theyearoftheTsunami.By2015,climate-relateddisasters,suchasfloods,faminesanddroughts,arepredictedtoaffectanaverageofover375millionpeopleeveryyear6.Otherdisasters(suchasearthquakes),andman-madeconflicts,willaffectmanymore.

In2009UNHCRreportedits‘totalpopulationofconcern’at36.5million,includingrefugees,statelesspersonsandthosedisplacedwithintheirowncountry.Bydefinitionthesearepeoplefleeingconflictorpersecution.Anestimated27.1millionoftheseweredisplacedwithintheirowncountriesasaresultofarmedconflict,generalisedviolenceorhumanrightsviolations7.Thisfigurerepresentedanincreaseofoveramillioninthenumberofinternallydisplacedpeople(IDPs)comparedwiththe26millioninternallydisplacedin2008andalsoin2007.Whilstthetrendforrefugees(fleeingtheircountry)hasgonedowninrecentyears,thoseinternallydisplacedhasconsistentlyrisen.The27.1millionreportedin2009weredisplacedin54countries.

Therisingworldpopulationandgrowthinurbanareas(demographicstress)willalmostcertainlyincreasethehumanitariancaseload,particularlyinlessdevelopedcountries.Alreadyanaverageof1,052peopledieinanygivendisasterinlessdevelopedcountries,comparedto23indevelopedcountries8.Theworld’spopulationispredictedtoreach9.1billionby2050,withvirtuallyallpopulationgrowthoccurringinlow-incomecountries,includingPakistan,Nigeria,Bangladesh,EthiopiaandtheDemocraticRepublicoftheCongo.

By2030,over61%oftheworld’spopulation(5billionpeople)willliveinurbanareas,mostlyinlowandmiddleincomenations9.Theconcentrationofpopulationsinurbanareaswillchangethenatureofmanyhumanitariandisasters.Morepeoplewillbelivingonmarginalland,inovercrowdedandpoorlyplannedhousing,lackingaccesstoadequatewaterandsanitation,healthcareandeducation.Whilstavailabilityofservicesandinfrastructureshouldmeanfewerfatalities,damagemayhavefarreachingconsequencesmakingrebuildingcostlier.Theimpactofdisastersonurbancentreswillhaveeconomicconsequencespotentiallygreaterthaninthepast,atlocal,nationalandregionallevel.

6 Oxfam,(2009).TheRighttoSurvive.7 InternalDisplacement(2010).GlobalOverviewofTrendsandDevelopmentsin2009.IDMC/NRC.8 Oxfam,(2009).TheRighttoSurvive.9 UNHABITAT.

10


Eart

hqua

kes

Rece

nt h

isto

ry o

f co

nflic

t

Mul

tipl

e st

ress

zon

e

Wat

er s

tres

s

Dem

ogra

phic

str

ess

Cro

p de

clin

e

Hun

ger

Coa

stal

ris

k

Figu

re5

: Are

as li

kely

to

be

at r

isk

of

inst

abili

ty a

s a

resu

lt o

f m

ulti

ple

envi

ronm

enta

l str

ess.

Dat

a fr

om

the

Def

ence

Co

ncep

ts a

nd D

oct

rine

Cen

tre

(DC

DC

) St

rate

gic

Tren

ds r

evie

w 2

006

-203

6 an

d In

tern

atio

nal C

hart

er ‘S

pace

and

Maj

or

Dis

aste

rs’.

11

Challenges

Growingfoodinsecurityislikelytocreatenewhumanitarianemergencies,withincountriesandregionsandalsoglobally.Theexistenceofnearlyabillionchronicallyhungrypeople,primarilyinAsiaandAfrica,alreadyexacerbatestheconsequencesofemergencies.Thereispotentialforrepeatedfoodpricespikessimilartothoseofrecentyears,whichhaveespeciallydamagingeffectsondevelopingcountries.Underlyingthesechallenges,theworldasawholefacesthetaskofincreasingfoodproductionby70to100%by2050inordertocopewithagrowingpopulationwithagreaterlivestockbaseddiet.Thereisagrowingdemandforbio-fuelsandincreasingconstraintsareposedbythepriceoffertilisersandfuels,theshortageoflandandwaterandtheirincreaseddegradation.Climatechangewillreduceyields,sometimescatastrophically,necessitatingtheproductionofstoredsurplusesinsomeregionstocompensateforlosseselsewhere.

Globalisationandtheincreasinglyinterconnectedworldinwhichwelive,meansthatdisastersoftenhaveaglobalimpact.Pandemicsspreadrapidlythroughairtravel.Economicshocksinoneregionspreadthroughcommoditypriceincreaseandlossofremittanceflows.Conflictdoesnotrespectborders,andspilloverfromconflict-affectedareascontributetoregionaldestabilisationandrefugeeflows.Migrationandchangingemploymentpatternswillcontributetovulnerabilityinunexpectedways,withthepotentialtocreatenewsecuritythreats.

Futurecrisescoulddifferfundamentallyfrompastexperienceandtheprospectof‘synchronousfailures’isagrowingconcern,aswiththenuclearthreatinJapancausedbytsunami.Newsourcesofdisplacementorconflictarealsopossible,forinstanceaswaterresourcesbecomescarce10.

TheDiasporacommunityisplayinganincreasinglysignificantroleinhumanitarianresponses.Remittanceflowsarealreadythesecondlargestsourceofforeigndirectinvestment(FDI)fordevelopingcountriesandincreasesignificantlyafteranemergency.TheDiasporacommunitycanalsoinfluencethesizeandtypeofdonorresponse,dependingonitssizeandvociferousness.

AseconomiesinChina,India,BrazilandtheGulfStatescontinuetogrow,theyareplayinganincreasinglyimportantroleglobally.Theyarebecomingmoreinvolvedinhumanitarianemergencyresponses,particularlyintheirneighbouringregions.ChinawasanimportantactorintheresponsetothePakistanfloodsattheendof2010.Theinternationalhumanitariansystemneedstoworkmorewiththesepartners,particularlyasitispossiblethattraditionalDACdonorswillbeabletoprovidefewerresourcesfordisasterreliefinthecomingyears.TheUSCongressisconsideringwhethertocutAmerica’shumanitarianassistancebudgetin2011,reducingU.S.foodaidprogrammesby41%($687million)andOfficeofForeignDisasterAssistancefundingby67%($875million).

Timelyandunimpededaccesstoaffectedpopulationsisbecomingmoredifficultduetotheincreasinglycomplexnatureofemergencies.Therehasbeenanunprecedentedgrowthinviolentattacksonhumanitarianworkers(177%increasefrom1997to200811)andthereisagrowingneedforincreasedprotectionandsecurityaspartofthehumanitarianresponse.Governmentsandnon-stateactorsinconflicthavebecomeincreasinglysophisticatedintheirattemptstomanageinternationalhumanitarianism,makingtraditionalwaysofinterveningmoredifficult.

Mediareportingofhumanitarianresponseshasgrownoverthelastyearsandwillcontinuetohaveanimpactonthepoliticalandpublicreactiontodisasters.Donorswill

10 HumanitarianFuturesProgramme,(2010)TheWatersoftheThirdPole:sourcesofthreats;sourcesofsurvival.

11 JohnBorton,(2009).FutureoftheHumanitarianSystem:ImpactsofInternalChanges.

12


havetomakedifficultdecisionsonhowtorespondtoadisasterinthefullglareof24/7mediaattention.

Increasedmediacoverageandnewwaysofcommunicatingthroughsocialmediatools,suchasTwitterandFacebook,willallowclosercontactbetweenrecipientsofaidandthosedonatingthemoney.Togethertheywilldemandgreateraccountabilityofthedeliverersandtheofficialdonoragencies.

Responding to increased need

Theincreaseintheinternationalhumanitariancaseloadandchallenges,havethepotentialtobreakanalreadystretchedinternationalhumanitariansystem,whichisstrugglingtocopewithcurrentlevelsofneed.Thereweretwomajorhumanitariandisastersin2010,whichrequiredinternationalhumanitarianassistance–theearthquakeinHaitiandfloodsinPakistan.Inbothcases,theinternationalhumanitariansystemshoweditselftobelessthanthesumofitspartsandtheresponseswerecharacterisedbyweakleadership,poorcoordinationandaslowresponse.

Theinternationalhumanitariansystemevolvedover150years,itwasnotplannedordesigned.Asaresult,therearegaps,overlapsandnumerousinefficienciesinthewayitworks.Thefuturechallengesoutlinedabovewillneedamoresophisticatedoperation.Newandinnovativewaysofworkingneedtobewidelyintroducedtoimprovetheefficiencyandspeedofdisasterresponse.Strongerlinksbetweenhumanitariananddevelopmentwork;betterleadershipandcoordination;accesstonewresourcesthroughimprovedpartnerships,andengagementwithnewactors;betteruseoftechnologyandinnovations;andincreasedaccountability,willallbevitalpartsofahighperforminginternationalhumanitariansystem,whichisgreaterthanthesumofitsparts.

Fortoolong,theperformanceoftheinternationalhumanitariansystemhasbeeninconsistent,failingthosemostinneed.NumerousreportshavebeenwrittenbytheUN,NGOsandotherinternationalactors,inresponsetosuchconcerns.Seriousissueshavebeenidentified,butnotaddressed.Nowisthetimeforastepchangeintheapproachtohumanitarianreform.Merelyimprovinguponwhathasbeendoneinthepastwillnotbeenoughtomeetthechallengesofthefuture.

13

Findings

4. FindingsThefirstpeopletorespondtodisastersandconflictaretheonesaffectedbythem.Friendsandneighbourssearchthroughtherubbleforlovedonesafterearthquakes;localhospitalsworkthroughthenighttocarefortheinjured.

Inmanycountriesgovernmentsroutinelyaffectedbydisastershavebecomeadeptatresponseandprevention.CasestudiesforthisreviewshowdramaticgainsinplacessuchasBangladeshandIndonesia12.Butalltoooftentheinternationalresponsearrivesasthoughthiswerenotthecase,sweepingasidelocalrespondersandaddingtothechaosratherthanalleviatingit.

Inconflictsituationstheinternationalsystemoftenbecomesthelasthopeforpeoplelivingintheworstcircumstances.Whereitisslow,orgetsthingswrong,itisthesepeoplewhosuffer.

Iftheworldisgoingtogetbetteratthechallengessetoutintheprecedingchapter,thenthishastochange.DonoragencieslikeDFIDhavetoworkwithgovernments,andwithaffectedpeople,aswellaswithaidagencies.Theyhavetosupportlocalinstitutionsratherthanweakenthem,especiallywherethereisconflict.

Wherenationalgovernmentsarecapable,theyinvariablyleadtheresponsetodisasterevenwhenitisonaninternationalscale.Whengovernmentsareoverwhelmedtheyeitherstruggletoassertthemselves,orfindtheyarecompletelyunabletocoordinate.Insomeinstancesgovernmentsareactivelybelligerent,orhostiletointernationalresponse(ortoaparticulargroupintheirpopulationbeinghelped).Thissuggestsfourbroadcategories:

• Strongandcapablegovernmentswhotakethelead(e.g.India).

• Capablebutunderresourcedgovernmentswhoneedhelptolead(e.g.Mozambique).

• Governmentswhoareunabletolead,andneedtheinternationalcommunitytodothisontheirbehalfforatime(e.g.Haiti).

• Governmentswhoareunableorunwillingtoleadandareobstructive(e.g.Nigerin2009).

Inthesefourbroadcategoriestheinternationalcommunityhastoresponddifferently,buttheapproachhasnotalwaysreflectedthisreality.

DFIDtoohastendedtorespondasifalldisasters,andallgovernments,werethesame.Thisreviewsuggestsadifferentapproachisneeded.Suchanapproachwouldrequiremuchmoreworkontheanalysisofrisksandcapacitiesinadvance,incorporatingdisasterresilienceintodevelopmentprocesses.Italsorequiresmoreworkonbringingadisparateinternationalresponsetogethersothatitperformsmorereliably.Mostofall,itrequiresbeingapartner,abuilderofcoalitionsandawillingparticipantinthem.Thisreviewhascalledthisbeinga‘networkenabler’.

4.1 Anticipation

Disastersareoftenviewedinthepublicimaginationas‘actsofGod’.Inrealitymanyarepredictable.A2005WorldBankreport‘globalhotspots’13identifiescountriesexposedtomultiplenaturalhazards(earthquakes,droughtsandstorms),andthereareplentyofcredibledataavailableidentifyingcountriesmostaffectedbydisasters.

12 TsunamiEvaluationCoalition(2006).ALNAP.13 Dilley,Metal.(2005).NaturalDisasterHotspots:AGlobalRiskAnalysis.WorldBank.

14


TheUKDefenceConceptsandDoctrineCentre(DCDC)goesfurtherinits‘horizonscanning’reportof200714.Itidentifiesareasof‘multiplestress’,factoringindemography,economyandconflict.Climatechangeisanotherobviouselementofstress,orvulnerability,witharecentreport15identifyingsub-SaharanAfricaasoneofthemostatriskareas.

Whatisclearisthatprediction,althoughfarfromperfect,ispossibleforsomehigh-risknations.HurricaneseasonsintheCaribbeanandtheBayofBengalarewellknownandmonitored.ElNinoandLaNinaoceaneffectslastforsomeyearsandchangeweatherpatternsinwaysthatarepartlyunderstood.Rainfalldataforregionsandcountriesinaridzonessuggestsdroughtcyclescanbeidentifiedearly.

Whatisalsoclearisthatasclimaterelateddisastersincrease,thebetterwewillneedtobecomeatpredictionifwearetohaveanyhopeofcopingwiththese.Butdisastermanagersdonotmakeenoughuseofsuchscience,andscientistsdonotroutinelyproduceinformationforthisaudience16.TherainfallthatproducedPakistan’sterriblefloodsof2010happenedamonthbeforethefloodwatercauseditsgreatestdevastation.Theeffectswerepredictedbutnotactedon.

Thiscanalsobethecasewith‘foodsecurity’crises(famines).Thereareprovenearlywarningsystemsthatmonitorpotentialcrises,notablytheUSAIDsupportedFEWSNET.Despitethis,andproofthatpriorinterventionnotonlysaveslivesbutischeaper,these‘slowonset’disastersareregularlymissed.TheNigercasestudyforthisreviewshowshowclearevidencedoesnotalwaystriggeraresponse(theblockageinNigerwasdomesticpolitics),andhowtimelyinterventioncansavetensofthousandsoflives.

ManyagencieswereabletoactinNiger,despitetheintransigenceofgovernmentandthetardinessoftheUnitedNations.PartlythiswasduetopromptactionbytheEuropeanUnionhumanitarianorganisationECHO;itwasalsobecauseDFIDhasaninnovativeregionalfundinWestAfricaforcrisisresponse.Thisregionalfundallowsagenciestogetmoneyquicklyforunexpectedandunnoticeddisasters–itallowsforearlyaction.Thousandsofchildrenweresavedasaresultoftheseearlyactions.

Earlyactionisatleastasimportantasearlywarning,andisamatterofpoliticalwill.TheexpansionoftheCentralEmergencyResponseFund(CERF)wasinpartawayofmakingsuchdecisionsmoretechnicalandlesspolitical.Supportingresilienceinatrisknationswillfurtherincreasethelikelihoodthatearlyactionwillbetaken.Buttherewillalwaysbeanelementofrisk,howevergoodthescience.Beingabletotoleratefailure–gettingitwrongoccasionally–isimportant.Thecostbenefitofninetimelyinterventionseasilyoutweighsonewrongjudgementcall.

Oneareawherepredictionisimproving,butstillhasawaytogo,iswithearthquakesandvolcanoes.Thesegeo-physicalhazardsaredifferenttothehydro-meteorologicalonestouchedonabove(floods,droughtsandstorms).Theytendtohappenlessfrequentlybutcauseseveredamage.

Althoughearthquakescannotbepredictedwithanycertaintyinshorttimeframes,thelocationofmajorfaultlinesiswellknown.ThequestionofearthquakesinKathmanduorTehraniswhenratherthanwhether.Therehavebeensignificantadvancesinunderstandingearthquakeriskandwhentheymightoccurthroughmonitoringgroundmotion.Likewise,understandingthereasonsforbuildingdamageandcollapsesothatcodesandstandardscanbedevelopedtoensuresafeconstructioninthefuture.Science

14 TheDCDCGlobalStrategicTrendsProgramme2007–2036.See:www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/Organisation/AgenciesOrganisations/DCDC/

15 DARA(2010).Climatevulnerabilitymonitor2010:thestateofclimatecrisis.16 Seeforinstancethe1MarchSelectCommitteeonScienceandTechnologyfindingsthatthere

isinadequateuseofscienceforanticipatingemergencies.

15

Findings

inthisareahasproventohaveverysignificantlyreducedfatalitiesanddamageinmanycountriesandiscritical,butresearchandinvestmentisneededelsewheretopromotesafeconstruction.

Anticipatingandpredictingconflictisanotherareathathasimprovedinrecentyears.RegularcrisesindicesfromtheInternationalCrisisGrouportheFundforPeacearebeingusedbygovernmentstoinformdecisionsonearlyaction.Theseareimportant,asincontrasttoearlywarningfornaturaldisasters,therehasneverbeenashortageofwarningaboutpendingconflictsinahostofplaces.

Whilstpredictingsinglehazardsispossiblebutoftenneglected,anticipatingunexpectedhazards,orcombinationsofhazardsisafactorofmagnitudemoredifficult.Thepossibilityofalarge-scalefloodcausinganuclearspillforinstance(asJapanhasproved),ordroughtsinRussiaandfloodsinAustralialeadingtofoodpriceriotsinWestAfricaisdifficulttoseeinadvance.Nevertheless,inaninter-connectedworldtheseeventsareevermorelikelyandpolicymakersneednewtoolstohelpthemanticipate.

Recommendations

DFID should:

1 Assemble and regularly update a global risk register for DFID using information gained from its country teams and international organisations.

2 MakebetteruseoftheDFIDChiefScientisttosupportUKscienceinanticipatingcrises.

3 Makethisavailableasacontributiontopre-crisisarrangementsacrossthesystem.

4.2 Resilience

Theimpactofadisasterdependsonhowwellpreparedacountryistocopewithit.Somearebetterabletobouncebackthanothers.TheHaitiearthquakeatthebeginningof2010killed230,000people.AmuchlargerearthquakeinChilelaterintheyearkilled3,000people,almostonehundredtimesfewer.

Butthisisnotonlyaboutrichnations;a1970cycloneinEastPakistan(nowBangladesh)killednearlyhalfamillionpeoplewhereasasimilarstrengthcyclonein2008killed3,000.ThedifferencewasthatintheinterveningthirtyyearsBangladeshhadbecomebetterprepared.

TheearthquakeinHaitihassetbackthedevelopmentofthatnationmanyyears.BandaAcehinIndonesiawasdevastatedbythe2005tsunami,butmanagedtorebuild100,000housesinthreeyears.BringingtheresourcesoftherestofIndonesiatobearenabledthisrapidrecovery.Beingabletochannelinternationalresourceseffectivelywasanotherkeyaspect.ThiswassimilarlytrueforKhyberPakhtunkhwaprovinceinPakistanwhichwasbetterpreparedasaresultofitsresponsetothe2005earthquake.

Beingprepared,andbeingabletorecoveriswhatmakesnationsresilient.Conversely,wherenationsarefragiletheyaremuchlessabletocope.Beingabletoanticipatedisasters,havingshockresistantinfrastructure,socialprotectionmechanisms,financialandhumanresourcesareallpartofbeingresilient,asistheabilitytoadapt.

16


Embedding resilience within development programmesDisasterscanhavesignificantimpactoncountries’development.Between2000and2009MunichReestimateseconomiclossesfromdisasterswere$670billion17.SomesmallcountrieshavesustainedlossesthroughdisasterofseveraltimestheirGDP,settingthembackyears.Vietnamlosesover1%ofitsGDPannuallydealingwithdisasters.Floodsanddroughtscanhaveknockoneffectsintermsoffoodproductionandinternationaltrade.

AseminalWorldBankstudyin2004foundthatdisasterssloweconomicgrowthinthelongtermaswellasshortterm18.Thisisespeciallytrueincountriesthatdependonagriculture.Thismeanspoorercountriesaredoublyaffected,astheyhavelessabilitytocopefinanciallywiththecostofdisasters,andtheireconomiesareworseaffectedoverall.Disastersalsoaffecttheeconomiesofmiddle-incomecountrieshowever,astheytendtohavemanufacturingsectors(forexample)connectedtoagriculture.DroughtsinsouthernAfricainthe1990sledtobigswingsinGDPgrowthacrosstheregion.

Theseriskslooksettoincreasewithpopulationgrowth,climatechangeandresourcescarcity.InthefragilecountrieswhereDFIDisincreasinglyworking,achievingpovertyreductionwillgetharder.Reducingmaternalmortalityandothermillenniumdevelopmentgoalswilldependonnationsbeingresilient.

Ultimatelydevelopmentistheanswertobeingabletocopewithdisasters–theexampleatthebeginningofthischapterillustratesthat–butgettingtodevelopmentcandependonbeingabletobouncebackfromdisasters.Bangladeshismoreresilienttodisasterseconomicallybecauseofstructuralchangesinitsagriculturalsector(thederegulationofagriculturalinvestmentledtomoredisasterresistantirrigation).TheearlywarningandactionsystemsinBangladeshhavealsopreventedhighdeathrates.

Thisanalysishasimplicationsfordevelopment,andespeciallyfortheoverallgoalwithinDFIDofreducingpoverty.Disastersoftenhitthepooresthardest.Evenwhenacountrycopesquitewelloverallwithadisaster,thepoorestandmostvulnerablecanbedisproportionatelyaffected.

TheWorldBankrecognisesthisinitsguidelinesforpovertyreductionstrategies(PRS).Oneofthefourdimensionsofpovertyis,“exposuretoriskandincomeshock”,atahouseholdlevel,acommunitylevelandanationallevel.Despitethis,littleisroutinelydoneaboutdisastersindevelopmentstrategies,noraretheymentionedintheMillenniumDevelopmentGoals.Conventionalthinkinghasbeenthatscarceresourcesshouldbeusedtopromotegrowth,andthatthisisultimatelytheansweranyway.

Thisapproachisnolongerdefensible.Thebodyofacademicevidencethatdisastersandshocksmustbetakenseriouslyisgrowing,asistheevidencethatinvestmentinreducingdisasterriskshowsgoodreturns.FlooddefenceandretrofittingbuildingsforearthquakesintheUSfoundanaveragecostbenefitofonetofour19.Thesameistrueindevelopingcountries.Incorporatingdisastercostsintolongertermeconomicplanningisnecessaryifvaluabledevelopmentresourcesarenottobedivertedtorecovery.

Anewresilienceapproachwillincludeworkingatregional,national,communityandhouseholdlevel.Atnationallevelthereneedstobemoreworkondisastermanagement.Workonlegalframeworks,workonplanning,andworkonbolsteringthedepartmentsthatrespondafterdisasters,suchasnationaldisastermanagementagencies.Civilsocietyorganisationsthatrespondtodisastersshouldbesupportedtoplaytheirroletoo.

17 QuotedbyKunreutherin,“Encouraginginvestmentinadaptationmeasuresthroughmulti-yearcontracts”.Apaperforthe2010WorldEconomicForumHumanitarianCouncil.

18 BensonandClay(2004).Theeconomicimpactsofdisasters.WorldBank.19 Somecostbenefitanalysiscitefactorsashighas1:24.SeeTearfundforinstanceat

http://tilz.tearfund.org/webdocs/Tilz/Research/Investing%20in%20Communities%20web.pdf

17

Findings

Atcommunityandhouseholdlevelthereneedstobeworkonmechanismsandinstitutionstorespond(suchascivilcontingencycommittees),andoninfrastructurethatcanwithstanddisasters,orplayadualrolelikeschoolsthatareusedascycloneshelters.

Governmentsandcivilsocietyorganisationsalsoneedhelptoprovidesocialprotectionmechanisms.TheNigercasestudyforthisreviewdemonstratesthattargetedcashdistributionsattherighttimecanstophouseholdsslippingintostarvation,sellingassetsandincurringdebtalongtheway.Relativelysmallinputsattherighttimecansaveyearsofmiseryanddisease.Crucially,thecombinationofsuchmeasurescanprovidethebasisforeconomicdevelopment.Peoplelivingontheperilousedgeofextremepovertycannotaffordtotaketherisksneededtoescapethissituationotherwise.

Thiskindofworkistakingplaceindifferentsectors.Disasterriskreduction(DRR)workseekstobuildlocalresponsesystemsandsmallmitigationinfrastructure.TheHyogoFrameworkforActionsetsoutfivebuildingblocksforeffectivedisasterriskreduction;governance,riskassessment,knowledgeandeducation,riskmanagementandvulnerabilityreduction,anddisasterpreparednessandresponse.Butasthemoneyisusuallyhumanitarianitisonlyavailableafteradisasterhasstruck.DFIDhadastandingpledgetospend10%ofitsresponsebudgetonDRR,butthesemeasuresareneededbefore,notaftertheevent.Climatechangeadaptationworkisoftenaboutmitigationworktoo–fromplantingmoremangrovestonewseedvarietiesforwarmersummers.DevelopmentinplaceslikeEthiopiaisfocusingmoreonsocialsafetynetsandisexploringexcitingnewideassuchasmicroinsurance.Allofthisneedstobebroughttogetherformaximumeffectiveness.

Intheaftermathofthe9/11atrocitiesintheUS,theUKputinplacea‘nationalresilienceplan’,recognisingthatitdidnothavethewherewithaltodealwithsuchadisaster.Thisplansetsoutprotocolsforincidentcontrol,establishesthecapacitiesneededforresponseandensurestraining,equippingandregularpractising.Manycountrieshavenationaldisasterprotocols,buttheyarenotresourcedorplannedindetail.

Thisreportwasnotmandatedtolookatprotractedconflicts.Itisclearthough,thatinfragilestates,orstatesinconflict,theinternationalhumanitariansystemisoftentheprovideroflastresorttotheverypoorest.ThecasestudyinDRCongoforthisreporthighlightedthevulnerabilityofstatesandsocietiestoeventhesmallestshockswhentheyareveryfragile.Alackofinstitutionsandcapacitiesmeansthataccidentsleadtomuchhigherlossoflife,smallconflictscannotberesolvedandgrowtobigonesandcommunitiesarenotabletoprotectthemselves.InDRCongothereareemergenciesalmostconstantly;boataccidentsthatkillhundreds,petroltankerexplosionsthatdothesame.Afishingconflictin2009thatledtotheexodusofthousandsofpeopleacrosstheborderwhenitturnedviolent.Massrapesandrobberyarecommittedintheeastbyrovinggroupsofbandits.

Allofthisisavoidablewithworkinginstitutions.Alicensingauthoritythatdoesnotallowferriestorunwithoutcheckingthemforsafety;afireservicethatcanattendaccidentsbeforetankersexplode;ajudicialprocessthatallowsdisputestoberesolvedbeforetheybecomeviolent;apoliceorsecurityservicethatarrestsbandits.

Inthisvacuum,muchofwhatistodaycalled‘humanitarian’inDRCongoissimplysubstitutionservicedelivery.Healthcareisnotprovidedbythestateandpeoplearetoopoortopayforit.Sohumanitarianagenciesprovidebasichealthcareandrespondwhenmajorkillerslikecholeraormeaslesbreakout.Resilienceisanimportantwaytounderstandthiswork,andwillbeimportantasDFIDworkstobuildinstitutions,makingstateslessfragile.Ensuringhumanitariananddevelopmentworkcloselytogetherwillbevitallyimportant.

18


Regional, national and local capacities DFIDhasnottraditionallyfundedgovernmentsdirectlyinhumanitariancrises(lessthan1%inthelasttwoyears),althoughithasfundedmulti-donorreconstructionfundsthroughtheUNandtheWorldBank.Similarly,whilstDFIDhasbuiltupconsiderableexpertiseinrapidprocurement,itusuallydonatesitsinkindassistancethroughaidagencies,ratherthangovernment.Therehasbeenfundingfornationaldisasterpreparedness,typicallythroughtheUN,incountrieslikeBangladesh.Thisisnotroutinelylinkedwithsubsequentresponsehowever.InMozambiquethegovernmentaskedfor£2milliontohelpthemprepareaheadofanticipatedfloodingin2006.Thiswasnotforthcoming;whentherewasfloodinglaterthatyeartheinternationalresponsecostover£60million.

NeitherdoesDFIDroutinelyfundlocalNGOsorlocalorganisationsinrapidonsetemergencies,althoughitfundsthemindirectly,asmanygrantstointernationalpartnersarepassedontonationalandlocalorganisations.InBangladeshUNDPhasalistofmorethan30pre-approvedlocalNGOsthatitgaveDFIDmoneytoafterthe2008cyclone.ManyoftheinternationalNGOs(andespeciallyfaithbasedorganisationslikeChristianAidandCAFOD),routinelyworkthroughlocalpartners.TheRedCrossandRedCrescentMovementalwaysworkthroughitsnationalsocieties.Despitethis,thefundingofnationalandlocalNGOsbyDFIDremainshitandmiss.Itisnotaconsciousstrategy,butmoreofaby-product.

Anapproachtailoredtogovernmentcapacitywouldofferseveraladvantages.GovernmentslikethePhilippinesandIndonesiacanalreadyrespondtoquitelargedisasterswithoutinternationalhelp.Preservinginternationalcapacityforthosedisastersthataretrulyoverwhelmingmakesmuchmoresensethanhavingtodeployexpensiveinternationalworkerstofloodssimplybecausethelocalsystemwassounderresourced.NationalDisasterManagementAgenciesexistinmostcountriesthatsufferregulardisasters,butoftenlackequipmentandtraining.Withanestablishedrelationship,itwouldalsobepossibletogivemoneyandgoodsdirectlytothegovernmentafteradisasterknowinghowsuchresourceswouldbeused.Specialfundingchannelscouldbesetupinadvance,makingtransparencyandreportingeasier.

Thesameistrueofcivilsocietyorganisations;organisationssuchastheRedCrossandRedCrescentNationalSocietiesoftenhaveformalresponsibilitiesinthenationaldisasterplan.Withproperresourcestheycanpreparejointlywithgovernmentandotherprivateorvoluntaryagencies,leadingtopromptresponseintheeventofdisaster.

Anincreasedfocusonnationalandlocalcapacitiescouldalsoincluderegionalbodies.TheAssociationofSouthEastAsianNations(ASEAN)playedapivotalroleinfacilitatingtheresponsetocycloneNargisinBurmainMay,2008.Thisregionalcooperationarounddisasterresponsehascontinued,withjointprotocolsondeploymentofmilitaryassetsoneofthelatestdevelopments.Increasinglygovernmentsatriskfromdisastersaresharingexpertisethroughsuchregionalforums,spreadinggoodpracticeanddevelopingjointearlywarningsystems.

Innovative funding models for risk transferAsthecostofdamagecausedbyextremeweatherconditionsissoaring,moresustainablewaystotackleweatherriskareneeded.Public-privatepartnershipsinriskfinancinghavebecomemorepopular,inparticularparametricinsurance.Catastrophebondsarealsoissuedmorecommonlynow,e.g.byMexicotoprovideresourcesintheeventofsevereearthquakeorhurricanedamage.

Insurancecanplayaroleinguaranteeingpredictableandreliablepayouts,allowingforlong-termplanning,increasinggovernments’self-determinationandownership,protectinglivelihoodsanddiminishingnegativeeffectsofreliefinterventionsonlocal

19

Findings

markets20.Thelimitationsarethatpremiumscanbetoohighwithhighopportunitycosts,andthatitisnoteasytotelliftheinsurancegivesvalueformoney.Thereisalsothedangerofmoralhazard–governmentsnotfocussingenoughonriskreductionandpreventionbecausetheyfeelinsured.

TheCaribbeanCatastropheRiskInsuranceFacility(CCRIF)isthemostprominentexampleofapublicprivateinsurancemechanismthatDFIDhasfunded.Thereviewwelcomesthisgroundbreakingwork.DFIDisnowalsoinvestinginthedesignoftheAfricaRiskCapacity,leadingtotheestablishmentofanAfrican-ownedriskpoolingentityforweatherrisk.

Recommendations

DFID should:

4 Ensure that building resilience is part of the core DFID programme in at risk countries, integrating the threat from climate change and other potential hazards into disaster risk reduction. Country offices should undertake contingency planning.

5 Promote national response capacities of governments and civil society in at risk countries including:

• Thedevelopmentofnationalresiliencestrategies.

• Theestablishmentofdirectfundingmechanisms.

• Regionalresponsemechanismswheretheyaddvalue.

• ThroughcivilsocietyorganisationssuchasRedCrossandCrescentSocieties.

• Nationalandlocalprivatesectorcompanies,whichareableatthecountryleveltosupportentrepreneurial,andmarketsolutions,whichwillincreaseinresilienceandimprovedisasterresponse.

4.3 Leadership

Insituationswherethegovernmentofanaffectedcountryisunabletoleadhumanitarianresponse,theUNremainstheonlylegitimateauthoritythatcandoso.Overtheyearsacomplexsystemhasbeenputinplacetodothis,withadedicatedglobalEmergencyReliefCoordinatorsupportedbythebigspecialisedUNagencies.

AlthoughtheUNhasthemandatetolead,itsperformancehasbeenverydisappointingoverall.InallbutoneofthecasestudiesforthisreviewUNleadershipwaspoor.Thiswasespeciallytrueinthelargerdisasters.Itistrueatastrategiclevelandatanoperationallevel.Itistrueacrosstheinternationalsystem,andinindividualcrises.Thereisrarelyavisionbeyondfundraising,andrarelyanorganisingnarrativethatdrawstogetherthedisparatecapacities.

WhatisneededisacompleteoverhaulofstrategicandoperationalleadershipintheUN.Thisreviewfindsthatthereisappetiteforthiswithinthesystem,andthatitisintheinterestoftheUKtochampionit.Theissueisattheheartofensuringaffectedpeoplereceivewhattheyneedandachievingvalueformoney.Onthestrengthofthesefindingsthereviewconcludesthatthereisaneedforfurtherhumanitarianreforms.

20 ChristianAid,“DoesDisasterInsuranceHaveaRoleinClimateChangeAdaptation”,TimeforClimateJustice,June2010.

20


Strategic leadershipFirstandforemost,thereisaneedforvision.ThereisaneedfortheUNatthehighestleveltosetoutthechallengesaheadandhowitplanstodealwiththem.Thereisaneedforthisvisiontobebackedpolitically,andforthispoliticalbackingtoextendintoresponseswhentheyoccur.Leadersonthegroundmustbeconfidenttheyhavethebackingoftheirseniors,andofthememberstatesoftheUN.

Secondlythereisaneedfortherightpeople.DuringthereviewsconsultationsinNewYorktheideaofa‘standaside’mechanismwherebythebesthumanitarianleaderscouldbedeployedintomegacriseswasdeveloped.ThisideahassubsequentlybeentakenupintheIASCandthereviewstronglysupportsthisprocess.

TheUNneedstodevelopacadreofcapablehumanitarianresponseleaders.Itneedstherightapproachtotalentmanagementandtherighttermsandconditionstounderpinthis.Itneedstolookoutsideitsownnarrowbasetosecurethebesttalent.

Finally,thereisaneedfortherightsupportsystemsandstructuretoenableleaders.Someofthesestructuresareinplaceandworkwell;forinstancefinancingwhichhasimprovedasaresultofthelastroundofreform.Butplanningandprioritisationremainweakandpoliticised.LeadersofthevariousUNhumanitariancoordinationmechanismshavenoformalauthorityandreportinglinesbetweenclustersandcoordinatorsareunclear.Therearefewstandingsupportstaffanddeploymentoftherightteamcantakeweeks.Thesehavebeenseenasintractableissues,butwillhavetochangeifperformanceistoimprove.

FortheUKasastrongUNsupporter,andalargedonortothesystemitisimportanttoworkontheseissues,asoutlinedabove.TheUKisalsooneofthebestplaced.Itdrovethelastroundofreformsandwillreceivemuchsupportforinitiatinganewround.Todosoitwillneedtobuildcoalitionsofsupportandworkcleverlywithitspartners.Thisisexpandedinfurthersectionsofthisreport.

Operational leadershipOneofthefundamentaldrawbackstoachievingamorereliableresponsefromtheUNisthatitismorealoosecollectionofstrongandseparateagenciesthanawellfunctioningsystem.WFPistheworld’spremierfoodagency,withlogisticsthatrivalmanymulti-nationalcompanies.UNICEFistheworld’slargestchildren’sagencyprovidingeverythingfromcleanwatertotemporaryeducation.TherefugeeagencyUNHCRcansetupcampsforhundredsofthousandsofdisplacedpeoplefleeingwarorpersecution.Eachhasseparatemandates,boards,missionsandhistoriesandallaresuspiciousoftoomuchcentraldirection.Allthreeneedtofundraiseinbigemergencies,asdotheWorldHealthOrganisation(WHO)andtheFoodandAgriculturalOrganisation(FAO)whoarealsoinvolvedinhumanitarianemergencies.Thiscreatescompetition,makingprioritisationespeciallydifficultasitcanhavefundingimplications.

Theclusterapproachwasdevelopedasthelatestattempttosolvethecoordinationproblem.Itsoughttofillgapsinhumanitarianservicedelivery.Improvedcoordinationofallplayersbyanamedleadagencywasexpectedtoeliminategapareasandavoidoverlaps.Keyagenciesweregivenresponsibilityforleadershipandcoordinationforeachsector;forexampleWFPleadsthelogisticscluster,WHOleadsthehealthcluster.TheclusterleadisusuallyaUNagencyalthoughIFRCleadstheshelterclusterandSavetheChildrenco-leadstheeducationclusterwithUNICEF.

Butperformanceofclustershasbeendisappointing.Clustercoordinatorsoftenlackexperienceandthetrainingrequiredtoprovidestrongleadership.Toooftenclustermeetingsareinformationsharinggatheringsinsteadofthestrategicdecisionmakingforumstheyshouldbe.Andthesystemhasmerelyreplicatedagencydivisionsmeaningprioritisationremainsjustasdifficult.

21

Findings

Theclustersystemneedstoberevisedtoaddressthesefailings.Theroleoftheinternationalsystemistosupportnationalgovernmentintimesofdisaster,nottotakeover.Agreateremphasisthereforeshouldbeputonclusterleadershipbynationalgovernmentwhereappropriate.NGOsshouldplayagreaterroleinco-chairingclusters.Wherethishappens,theclusteroftenhasabetterunderstandingofthesituationontheground.

Inmegacrises,thereisaneedfordedicatedandexperiencedclusterleadership.Wherethisisnotthecaseexperiencedcoordinatorsshouldbedeployed,securedbypredictabledonorfunding.Inlargeremergenciesclustersshouldbecometwo-tier,consistingofa‘strategicbody’groupandan‘informationsharing’group.Thisallowsallpartnerstobeincludedbutalsoallowsforacoregrouptosetstrategicdirection.

Somedisastershaveseenanoverproliferationofclustersandsub-clusters.Thiscanleadtoless,ratherthanmoreeffectivecoordination.Infact,notallclustersareneededineveryemergency.Thetypeofdisasterandtheeffectivenessofexistingcoordinationmechanismsshoulddictatehowmanyandwhichclustersneedtobeactivated.InnaturaldisastersthisshouldbeanationalgovernmentleddecisioninconsultationwiththeUNHumanitarianCoordinator(HC).

TobefullyeffectiveclustersneednationalNGOsandlocalgroups.Butthesearetheverypartnersthatgetexcludedfirstduetosecurityreasons,languagebarriersorsizeofcluster.Thiscouldberectifiedifdonorsmadelocalparticipationaprerequisiteforclusterfundingineachemergency.Clustersalsoneed‘nontraditionalactors’suchastheprivatesectoriftheyaretobeeffectiveincoordinatingthefullresponse.

UNagencyautonomymeansthatclusterleadsoftenreportthroughtheiragencyratherthanthroughtheHCandOCHAcanbeexcludedaltogether.ClearreportinglinesshouldbeestablishedbetweenHC,clusterlead,agencyandOCHA.

Human resource capacitiesTheunevenqualityofpersonnelisamajorlimitingfactorinhumanitarianresponse.Thisisparticularlytrueattheleadershiplevel,butalsowithclusterleadership,technicalexpertsandmid-levelmanagers.Onemajorissueisthatthereisnostraightforwardprofessionalrouteintohumanitarianwork.Aidagencieswanttohireexperiencedpeoplebuthowdopeoplegetexperienceunlesstheyareofferedajob?Gettingstartedinhumanitarianworkbecomesachickenandeggconundrum.

Thereisaneedtogrowthepoolofcompetentprofessionalsinvolvedinhumanitarianwork.Thisrequiresinvestment,andacommitmentfromhumanitarianagenciestocreatecareerpathsforhumanitarianprofessionals.Manyaidagenciesgrewupwithoutacultureoftraining,insteadvaluingrapidactionandon-the-joblearning.Thisapproachhasstrengths:aidagenciesremainnimbleandkeeptheircostslow.Butitalsomeansthat,toooften,managersandstaffdonothavealltheskillstheyneed.

Therehasbeenprogressonstaffskillsinthepastdecade,andanumberofworthwhileinitiatives.Butineverymajoremergencytherearestillsignificantnumbersofaidpersonnelwholacksomeoftheskillsessentialtotheirjobs.Theconsequencesarehardtomeasurebutareboundtoincludelostlivesandwastedfunds.

ThegulfisstarkestwhenoneconsiderstheinvestmenttheUKmilitarymakeintheirpreparedness.Typicallyprofessionalmilitaryforcesspend95%oftheirtimetrainingand5%oftheirtimeinaction.Forhumanitariansthisfigureisreversed;95%oftheirtimeisspentinactionand5%ofthetimetrainingwouldbeahighfigure.

Trainingisnottheonlymethodoflearningandshouldcomplement,notreplace,learningonthejob.Itneednotbeexpensiveorlengthy.Itshouldbebasedonanassessmentoftheskillsneededforthejob,takingaccountofskillsthatarealreadythere.Ideallyitshouldbecombinedwitharangeofcareerdevelopmentmeasures,which,overtime,resultinstrongindividualswithinwell-managedteams.

22


Intheprivatesectorthislessoniswellknownevenifnotalwaysfollowed.Themostsuccessfulcompaniestakecaretoinvestintheirstaff,andfasttrackthemwhentheyprovecapable.Andindeed,someofthebestaidagencieshavebeendoingsoforyears.

Someaidagenciesmaybereluctanttoinvestintrainingforfearofincreasingthepercentageoftheirfundsspentonadministration.Theyknowthepublicarerightlysensitiveaboutthis.Iftheyincreasedtheiradministrationbudgetsfrom,say,anaverageof10pinthepound,to12pinordertopayfortraining,theymightworrythatitwouldappearwasteful.Butifthe2pspentontrainingincreasestheimpactoftheremaining88p,everyoneshouldbepleased.Aidagenciesshouldexplaintodonorsandthepublicthattheirbeneficiarieswillbebetterservedifthereisamodestinvestmentinstaffdevelopment.Skilledstaffwillmakebetteruseofthefundstheyhavebeenentrustedwith.

Professionalisationoftheaidindustrywillcomethroughbetterpreparationandtrainingofstaff.DFID’scommitmenttothiscouldbedemonstratedbyinvestinginagencyskillsdevelopmentandbybettertrainingofitsownstaffworkinginhumanitariansituations.DFIDshouldinvestigateandsupportthedevelopmentofprofessionalstandardsthatitcanuseitselfandwillbeofusetoothers.

Recommendations

DFID should:

6 Build coalitions to drive forward humanitarian reform based on improving leadership, including;

• Rapiddeploymentofexperiencedleadershipteamsinbigcrises.Thisshouldincludea‘stepaside’systemtoensurethebestleadershipisinplaceatboththestrategicandoperationallevel.

• EncouragetheconveningofaUNHighLevelPaneltolookatwaysofimprovingtheinternationalhumanitariansystemtofacefuturechallenges.

• WorkcloselywithUKmissionstobuildcoalitionsforreformoftheinternationalsystem,includingmorecoherentuseofUNexecutiveboardpositions.

• WorkwiththeUNtocreateanewcadreofhumanitarianleadersandthetalentmanagementsystemsandtermsandconditionstosustainthis.

• WorkwithotherdonorsandtheUNtoresolvesomeofthedeficienciesinmanagement,recruitment,prioritisationandplanning.Thismustincludetherightsupportstaffavailableforrapiddeployment.

• WorkwithotherdonorsandtheUNtostrengthenandprovidebetterleadershipoftheclustersystem.

7 DFIDshouldmakeasustainedefforttoimproveskillsinthehumanitariansector.Thisshouldinclude;

• Worktocreateasetofstandardsforhumanitarianleadership.

• TrainingwithinDFID,aidagenciesandgovernmentsandcivilsocietyindisasterpronecountries.

• Ensuringpre-qualifiedpartnersdemonstrateadequateinvestmentinskillsdevelopment(seesection5.2).

23

Findings

4.4 Innovation

Theinternationalhumanitariansystemisfacinggreaterandmorecomplexchallenges.Newsocial,demographic,environmentalandpoliticalproblemsincreasinglydemandinnovativeproducts,organisationalprocessesandwaysofthinking.SynchronousfailuressuchasthoseseeninJapan;simultaneousdisasterstaxingglobalcapacitywillneednewapproaches.Itisnowwidelyacknowledgedthathumanitarianactorscannotsimplydomoreofwhattheyhavealwaysdone.

Buthumanitarianpractitionersandanalystsbemoantheslowpaceofchange.Relativelystraightforwardideaslikecashtransfershavetakenalongtimetobecomeaccepted.Thebarrierstoinnovationareoftenmoretodowithpoliticsandinstitutionalinterests.

Recentresearch21hasidentifiedanumberofsuccessfulhumanitarianinnovations.Andmajororganisationsarebeginningtounderstanditsimportance.USAIDhasmadeinnovationacentralpillarofitsongoingstrategicrenewalinbothpolicyandoperations22.TheWorldFoodProgrammeisinnovatingthewayitdeliversfoodaid23.

Thiscontextofgrowinginterestandcommitmentpresentsclearopportunities.DFIDhasareputationforbeing‘outaheadofthedonorpack’intermsofflexibilityandresponsiveness.IthassupportedspecificinnovationsprocessesbothatpolicylevelsuchastheGoodHumanitarianDonor-shipinitiative;andinoperationalcontextssuchascommunity-basedfeedingtherapy.Thisexperienceandreputationareassetsthatcouldbeleveraged,establishingtheUKasaninnovativeleaderinglobalhumanitarianefforts.

Evidenceshows24thatsuccessfulinnovationshaveanumberofcommonenablingfactors,includingeffectivesupportfromdonors,headoffices,seniormanagersandlike-mindedpeersinotherimplementingorganisations.Alsoimportantaregoodpartnershipswithactorsoutsidethetraditionalhumanitariansector.Anydonorseekingtoimprovethesystemmustworkonthebasisthatitisnotpossibletosinglehandedlyreformacomplexsystemwithmultipleactorsandfactors.Coalitionbuildingisvital.

Giventhelimitedresourcesthatwillbeavailablerelativetoothersectors(e.g.theprivatesector),itisessentialfordonorstotakean‘openinnovation’approachfromtheoutset.Collectively,DFIDanditspartnersneedtoinvestinrobustinnovationprocessesfocusingonbothlongstandingunresolvedproblemsandnewemergingchallenges.DFIDneedstobecomemoreconsistentinusingevidenceandsystematicanalysistodecidewheretoinvestandhow.Resourcesforstrengtheningtheinnovationscapacitiesofhighvaluepartnerswhichwillalsobeessentialtocreatethetimeandspaceneededforreflectionandgenerationofnewideas.

Amoreinnovativeinternationalresponsetodisastersneedstobefirmlygroundedinhumanitarianprinciplesandvalues.Theyneedtobuildontheprincipleofbetterlearningfromandwith,andgreateraccountabilityto,affectedcommunities.Manyofthemostimportantinnovationsofthepast30years–fromcashtocommunityfeedingtherapy–havecomefromrethinkingthiscentralrelationship.

Thereisanurgentneedtoleverageappropriateformsofscience,research,technologyandprivatesectorknowledgetosupporthumanitarianinnovation.WhileDFIDhasplacedconsiderableimportanceonresearchfordevelopment,withsignificantinvestmentinresearchcapacityNorthandSouth,therehasbeenrelativelylessattentionpaidtoresearchforhumanitarianaction,andnoneofithasfocusedon

21 www.alnap.org/pool/files/8rhach3.pdf22 www.usaid.gov/press/speeches/2010/sp101008.html23 www.wfp.org/content/revolution-food-aid-food-assistance-innovations-overcoming-hunger24 www.alnap.org/pool/files/8rhach3.pdf

24


Southerncapacities.Asnotedpreviouslyinrelationtoinsuranceandnationalresilience,thereisscopefortransformativedevelopmentsinthislastarea.

InnovationalsopresentsanumberofinternalopportunitiesandchallengesforDFID.OneofthekeyfindingsofthisreviewisthatthereareopportunitiestobenefitfromfreshideasthroughoutDFID’shumanitarianpolicyandoperationalwork.Moreworkisneededtosystematicallyidentifywheretheneedforinnovationismostpressing.DFIDstaffmembersareavitalassetfortheorganisation,withawealthofexperienceandknowledgefromarangeofdisastersettings.Butstaffarenotencouragedtoinnovate,noraretheyconsistentlyrewardedforit.Thereisnotimetodevotetodevelopingideas,andthereisoftenahardbattletogetnewwaysofworkingaccepted.

Anyefforttoenhancehumanitarianinnovationsneedstobuildonandenhancetheentrepreneurialandcreativecapabilitieswithintheorganisation.Thereisaneedtoprovideappropriatetraining,secondmentsandreflectionspaceforDFIDstaff.Effectiveinnovatorsandinnovationfacilitatorsshouldberewarded,andthisshouldbebuiltintoappraisalsystemsandultimatelycareerdevelopment.Leadersneedtofosteranatmosphereofenquiry,feedbackandchallenge,wherethereistoleranceofrisk.

DFIDalsoneedstoworktojointhedotsbetweenthesuccessfulinnovationsitfundsandtheproposalsitsubsequentlyapproves.Forinstance,DFIDprovidedsomeofthefirstfundstotrialthe‘plumpynut’ideainnutrition,sincehailedasoneofthemostexcitinginnovationsofthelastdecade.Butitdidnotpushthisnewwayofworkingthroughitsfundingdecisions.ThisurgentlyneedstochangesothatDFID’sresearchfundscansupportthedevelopmentofsuccessfulinnovationthataretakentoscalethroughoperationalfunding.

Twoapproachesarehighlightedherefortheirimportanceforaneffectivehumanitarianresponse,andalsoforhighlightingtherangeofwaysDFIDcansupportinnovations.

Cash based approachesOneoftheexcitingadvancesinrecentyearshasbeentheuseofcashforreliefandrecovery.Traditionally,humanitarianagencieswouldsupplygoods,butawealthofacademicworkhasprovencashtobemoreflexible,moreefficientandmoreeffectiveincertainsituations.

Whilstthebenefitofusingcashiswidelyacknowledged,itsadoptionatscalehasbeenfrustratinglyslow.Themajorityofreliefoperationsstillsupplystrickenpopulationswithblankets,potsandpans,soapandsoon.DFID,despitebeingafunderofresearchintocash,andasupporterofitasanapproachatapolicylevel,doesnotroutinelyrequireitspartnerstoworkwithcash.Thishastochange.

IntheNigercasestudyforthisreview,twoaspectsoftheresponsestoodout.ECHOinsistedthatitspartnersusedcash,requiringthemtoargueagainstitsuseratherthanforit.ConcernWorldwide,anNGO,demonstratedthatcashdistributionscouldpreventmalnutrition.Concerndidhalfoftheircashdistributionsusingmobilephones–theydistributedthephonesandthenusedatransfersystemcalled‘zap’toallowrecipientstobuygoodsinlocalshops.Withanestablishedinfrastructurefortransfer,costscanbemarginal.Itispossibletoenvisageasystemwherebyinleanyearstargetedcashdistributionsforseveralmonthswouldpreventmalnutrition,andfarcostliermedicalinterventions.

ThisreviewhasconcludedthatDFIDshouldfollowtheleadofECHOandmakecashbasedresponsestheusualreliefandrecoverypositionforitspartners.Partnersshouldberequiredtoexplainwhy they are not using cash,ratherthantheconverse.

Inevitablytherewillbetimeswhencashisnotappropriate.Wheremarketsdonotfunctionefficiently,largevolumesofcashmightpushpricesup.Wherethereare

25

Findings

extremesecurityconcernsthismightalsobeanissue.Twoofthecasestudiesfromthisreviewsuggestthatthesecircumstancesmaybelessfrequentthanimaginedhowever.InNigerthecashdistributionsbyConcern,SavetheChildrenandotherstookplaceinremoteareasatatimeofabsolutefoodshortages.Despitethispricesdidnotriseinthemarkets,astradersefficientlydrewinsurplusfromneighbouringNigeria.SimilarlyinDRCongo,‘voucherfairs’demonstratedthatlocaltraderscouldbringgoodstoneedypopulationsfarfasterandmoreefficientlythanaidagencies.

Onefearthathasconsistentlydoggedthescalingofcashisthatofcorruption.Theextensiveliteratureoncashhasfoundnoincreasedriskofthiscomparedtootherreliefgoodshowever,andwithsystemssuchasmobilephonetransferandmicrobankaccountsitmayinfactbeless.

ShelterProvidingadequateshelterisoneofthemostintractableproblemsininternationalhumanitarianresponse.Tentsaretoocostlyanddonotlastlongenough.Plasticsheetingcanbegoodbutmostoftenislowqualityandfallsapartimmediately.Rebuildinghousestakesyears,evenwhenlandissuesarenotmajorobstacles.

Tosolvethisissue,agencieshaveincreasinglyused‘transitionalshelter’,awiderangeofalternativesolutionsincludingcash,communalbuildingsandtemporaryshelters.Typicallyacompromisebetweenatentandafullhouse,transitionalsheltercanlastforthreeyearsuntilproperreconstructionisachieved.Atbestituseslowcostlocalmaterialsandisbasedonasimpledesign.Materialscanbeusedafterwardstoo,whenpeoplemovetotheirnewhome.

Whilstthisapproachshowspromise,therearealsochallenges.Transitionalshelterscostmorethanafewbitsofplasticsheeting,andinemergenciesthatarenotwellfunded‘transitional’canquicklybecome‘permanent’.Argumentsbetweenexpertsoverdesign,qualityandcostcanslowtheprocess,andweakcoordinationinthesectoroftenleadstoawidevarianceinwhatisprovided.Thatcanmeanaffectedcommunitiesgettingdifferentlevelsofprovisiondependingontheagencyallocatedtobuildtheirshelter.

Theissueofweakcoordinationwasattheheartoftheestablishmentoftheclustersystem.Assection4.3ofthisreviewsetsout,insomeareasthishasworkedwell.Logistics,foodandwaterhaveallimproved.Otherareashaveimprovedinparts.Inshelter,theInternationalFederationoftheRedCross(IFRC)wasnominatedastheclusterleadagency,andthishasnotworkedwell.Partlythisisbecauseshelterisdifficult.PartlyitisbecausethereisanartificialsplitwherebyIFRCisresponsibleintheimmediateaftermathofadisaster,butnotbeyondtheemergencyphaseofdisplacement.

DFIDhasbeenheavilyengagedinsheltersincetheIndianOceantsunamiin2004.Ithasfundedresearchandpushedqualitystandardsandcoordination.ThisreviewconcludesthatDFIDmustcontinueandintensifyitseffortstofindbettersolutionstoprovidingshelterafterdisaster.Shelteriscriticaltohealth,employment,familyandsafety.Withoutadequateshelter,inallbutthemostbenignclimatespeopleareterriblyvulnerable.Partlythismayinvolveresolvingtheclusterissuestouchedonabove.Partlyitwillinvolvemoreresearch.Partlyitmayinvolvebringinginnewactors,suchastheprivatesectorconsortiumrecentlyfoundedthroughtheWorldEconomicForum.Continuingtofundandresourceshelterduringresponsewillalsobeimportant.

TechnologyTechnology,althoughnotasilverbullettotheproblemsofhumanitarianaid,alsoneedsmoreconcertedsupport.

Someexistingtechnologiesofferconsiderablepotential.TheNigercasestudyforthisreviewhighlightedtheuseofmobilephonesforcashtransfers(alsosuccessfullyusedin

26


Kenya).Thisrapidlydevelopingtechnologycouldbecomethestandardinafewyears,revolutionisingthebankingandremittancesectoralongtheway.Satellitesarealreadywidelyusedintrackingstormsandinprovidingimageryforhumanitarianoperations.“Crowdsourcing”,suchasthatusedinKenyaandHaitimayprovetobeanimportantnewwayofdoingneedsassessment.Socialmediaisdrivingnewaccountabilitytouchedoninthesectionbelow.GooglehaspilotedseveralsoftwareapplicationsforhumanitarianoperationsincludingthroughitsGoogleEarthmapanditspeoplefindersoftwarenowbeingusedinJapan.

Thereareemergingtechnologiesthatalsohaveconsiderablepotential(andrisks).Foremostamongtheseisnanotechnology,whichiswidelyseenashavingthepotentialtotransformmedicine,watersafetyandfoodstuffswithinthenext5-10years.Anotherisagentbasedmodelling,increasinglyusedineconomics,whichmayhaveapplicationsinunderstandingthespreadofepidemicsorevenpopulationmovement.

Recommendations

DFID should:

8 Nurture innovation and its application in dealing with and preparing for humanitarian emergencies, including through partnership with operational agencies, private sector, technological innovators and science and research communities.

9 Appoint a Humanitarian Senior Research Fellow, reporting to the Chief Scientific Officer with a dedicated budget tasked with developing evidence and innovation.

10 Investinthreekeytechnologies;mobiletechnologies,satellitesanddatamanagementanddisplay.

11 Supportexplorationofemergingandcutting-edgetechnologiessuchasnanotechnology,andnewcomputermodellingapproaches.

12 Workwithpartnerstoensurecashbasedresponsesaregivenfullconsiderationandwhereappropriatebecomemuchmorewidelyadopted.

4.5 Accountability

Accountabilityinsuddenonsethumanitarianemergencieshasparticularcharacteristics:thepresenceofacuteneeds,lackofchoice,lackofvoiceandaccesstoformalprocedures,disconnectbetweendonorsandsurvivors,andtheprevalenceoflifeanddeathdecisions.Allofthesemakeaccountabilitymorechallengingbutalsomoreimportant.

TheparadigmisstillviewingtheaffectedpopulationtoomuchaswhateconomistJulianLeGrandhascalled“pawns”(passiveindividuals)andtheinternationalcommunityas“knights”(extremealtruists).Thisapproachcosts.Localcapacitiesarenotutilised,thebeneficiaryisnotinvolvedenoughandthequalityofdeliveryislowerthanitshouldbe.

Sincethelate1990sthehumanitariancommunityhasinitiatedanumberofinter-agencyinitiativestoimproveaccountability,qualityandperformance.DFIDhasbeenfundingthemostwidelyknownones:theActiveLearningNetworkforAccountabilityandPerformanceinHumanitarianAction(ALNAP),HumanitarianAccountabilityPartnership(HAP),PeopleInAidandtheSphereProject.

27

Findings

Theseinitiativesandothershaveimprovedstandards,quality,learningandtransparencyinthesectorbutnotenoughprogresshasbeenmade.Itistimenowtoputtheseapproachesattheheartofhowthesystemworks.

Thecasestudiesforthisreviewshowthatinvolvementofaffectedcommunitiesandprovisionofinformationaboutprogrammestorecipientsofaidwaspatchyeverywhere.Ingeneral,performancewasworstduringthereliefphase,andimprovingduringrecoveryandreconstruction.Theveryfactthatthemostinnovativepracticeshighlightedearlierarethosewhichfocusonrecipientcapacitiesandneedshighlightshowfarthesystemhastogo.

Theinternationalhumanitariansystemneedstoputaccountability,learningandtransparencyintothecentreofitsresponse.Withthetechnologyandmethodsnowavailable,thereisnoexcusenotto.Assistancehastobeinaccordancewithwhataffectedpeoplehavemadecleartheyneed,ratherthanwhatthesystemispreparedtooffer.Andtheinternationalsystemhastobeheldtoaccountforthat,andforlearninghowtodeliverimprovedservices.Thiscanbedonethroughbetterfeedbackloopswiththeaffectedpopulation,througharangeofmechanismssuchasListeningProject-styleassessments,HAPcomplaintsmechanismsandperceptionsurveys.

DFIDisbeingaskedtobemoreaccountablethaneverbeforetoUKtaxpayersinaperiodofheightenedgovernmentbudgetaryconstraints.DFIDhastakenimportantstepsontransparencyasasteptowardsgreateraccountabilityandisattheforefrontamongstdonorsonthis.UndertheUKAidTransparencyGuaranteeDFIDhasstartedpublishingdetailedinformationaboutallnewprojectsandprogrammesonthewebsince1January2011.DFIDrecognisesthattransparencycreatesbetterfeedbackfrombeneficiariestodonorsandtaxpayers.Ithelpstobetterunderstandwhatworksandwhatdoesnot.Italsohelpsreducewasteandtheopportunitiesforfraudandcorruption.

DFIDisalsocommittedtopushforfulltransparencyacrosstheinternationalaidsystembyaskingpartnersandotherdonorstoadheretosimilarstandardsoftransparency.

Andtosquarethecirclefromtransparencytoaccountability,DFIDhascommittedtoprovidingopportunitiesforthosedirectlyaffectedbyDFIDprojectstoprovidefeedbackontheirperformance.Thiscommitmentneedstoapplytoallhumanitarianemergencyworkaswell.Evenifputtingthemintopracticewillbemorechallengingthaninotherareas.

Improvingaccountabilityisintimatelytieduptotheworkonimpactassessments–forcredibleimpactassessmentsthereisaneedtoputdisaster-affectedpeopleatthecentreoftheanalysis.

Thiscanbesupportedthroughinnovativeuseofappropriatetechnologythatimprovescommunicationstoandfromaffectedpopulations.Hi-techwasseeninHaitiwiththeUshahidi“crowdsourcing”platform,low-tech–menonbicycleswithmegaphonesinBangladeshandBurmaforearlywarning.Mobilephonesandradioarebothimportanttoreachpeople.

Impact Theemergencyresponsesectordoesnotroutinelyassessimpact.Whatthismeansisthatforsomeoperationsitisalmostimpossibletosayhowtheassistancehelpedpeople,orevenwhetherithelpedthem.

Therearegoodreasonsforthissometimes.Inemergencies,thereislittletimetomeasureintheearlyhoursanddaysofaresponse,inwhatthereviewseesas“theCriticalPeriod”.Inconflictitcanbedangerous.Andsavinglivesisthepriority.Itisalsomoredifficulttomeasureavertingnegativechange(e.g.topreventfamine)thanbringingaboutapositivechange(asindevelopment)becauseofthelackofdecent

28


counterfactuals.Deliveringinsomeofthemostimportantsectorsofhumanitarianaid,suchasprotectionanddignity,isdifficulttoassess.Aidisonlyoneofanumberofinputsintothelivesofdisaster-affectedpeople.Anyattempttoassessevenatasystem-widelevelisplaguedwithattributionissues,neverminddowntothelevelofindividualdonors’contributionstoaparticularproject.

Otherreasonsfornotdoingimpactassessmentscannotbesoeasilyjustified:itisconvenientnottohavetodoit;theneedforhighvisibilityaction,shapedbydonorsandthemedia;thecompetitionbetweenagenciesandthelackofseriousconsultationwiththepeopleinneed;thefailuresinleadership.Perhapsmostimportant,impactassessmentsrequiretimeandresourcesthatarenottrivial,andtodatefewdonorshavebeenwillingtosupporttheseeffortsonthehumanitariansideofthesystem.

Thisisnolongeracceptable.Thesectormustincreaseitseffortstodemonstrateimpact,anditmustuseevidenceonwhatworksandwhatdoesnotandwhytoimproveitsperformance.Lessonsneedtobelearnedandapplied.DonorslikeDFIDneedtochangetheincentivesinthefinancingsystemtoensurethatimpactisroutinelymeasured,ratherthanfitfullyifatall.Perfectionisnotpossibleforthevalidreasonsoutlinedabovebutalotmorecanbedone.

Thisreviewfoundthattoolsexistorarebeingdevelopedtoovercomethemethodologicalchallenges.CasestudieshavebeencollatedbyALNAPandothers.AframeworkformonitoringandevaluatingresultsandimpactisbeingdesignedforDRCongo’sHumanitarianActionPlan.Thiswillprovidefurtherinsightintowhatcanandcannotbedone.Whatisnecessaryistomoveawayfromasystemwheremanyagenciesstillcontinuetomeasuresuccessinvolumeoffood,goodsorvaccinesdeliveredratherthantheimpactontheaffectedpopulation.Aparticularlyimportantandnecessaryareaforimpactassessmentswillbeininnovation,testingtherelativeimpactofoneapproachcomparedtoanother.

Tomeasureanddemonstrateimpact,actionneedstobetakenatvariousstagesofanemergencyresponseaswellasinresiliencebuildingprogrammes.Itcannotbedoneasanadd-onalone.Andthroughoutallstages,participatoryapproachesshouldbetakenwherepossible.

Intheory,needsassessmentsshouldprovidebaselinesagainstwhichimpactcanlaterbemeasured.Needsassessmentsshouldalsobedesignedandcarriedouthavingtheviewsofaffectedpeoplecentrestage.However,therealitylooksdifferent.Needsassessmentsroutinelylackbaselinedata.Theyaremoreaboutgatheringinformationforplanningandfundraisingbyspecificagenciesthanbuildingacomprehensivepictureofneedandprioritisation.Thereiscompetitionbetweenorganisationsandsectors,theprocessisnottransparentandsharinginformationissometimesdiscouragedasitmightposearisktoaninstitution’sroleintheresponse.Needsassessmentsarequiteoftentoolatetoinformfundingdecisions.

Thelackofbaselinesisnottheonlyproblem.Withoutacommonstrategyandagreeddefinitionsofhumanitarianoutcomes,impactassessmentsaredifficulttocarryout.Forthat,leadershipandstrongpartnershipsareessential(seesections4.3and4.6).

Monitoringhasalsobeenfoundtobeweakandsuffersfrompatchy,inconsistentefforts.Incomplexemergencieswheresecurityandaccessaremajorconstraints,monitoringisanevengreaterchallenge.Remoteprogrammingisincreasinglyused,especiallyincountrieslikeSomalia.

Ex-postevaluationstendtoevaluateactivitiesratherthanimpactanddonotoftenenoughincludeaparticipatoryelementsothatdisastersurvivorscanholdagenciestoaccount.Becauseofalackofresourcesandnarrowagendas,mostevaluationsfocusonaparticularprojectorprogramme;system-wideassessmentsarestillrare.Thequalityof

29

Findings

evaluations,asassessedbyALNAPfrom2000to2008hasbeenconsistentlydisappointing.Impactassessments,whetheragency-specific,sector-wideorsystem-wide,arenotusuallycarriedout.

Technologicaladvancessuchassatelliteimageryarestillnotusedenoughtocollectdataacrosstheprogrammingcycle,includingforneedsassessments,monitoringandimpactassessments.Neitherarenationalcapacitiesusedenoughinmonitoringandevaluativeefforts–whetheroperationalagenciesorthinktanksandacademics.

Addressing the needs of the most vulnerable Thehumanitariansystemispoorlyequippedtoensureanequitableresponseforthemostvulnerable.Whilstissuesspecifictochildren,age,oldpeople,womenandthosewithdisabilityarewidelywrittenabout,therearefewmechanismstodealwiththem.

Thereisnoformalplatformforcollectiveengagementonspecificissues,andthereislittleifanydisaggregateddataonneedsandimpactonvulnerablegroups.Alotoftheevidencebaseisanecdotal,pickedupbysomeonewhowasawareoftheneedsofvulnerablegroupswhiledoingsomethingelse.Culturallyinsensitivepracticessuchasdeliveringreliefitemsinsinglelanesarestillroutinelypractised.DuringthePakistanearthquakethispreventedwidowswithoutmalecompanyfromaccessingaid.AstudybyHelpAge25showsthatadisproportionatelylowamountofhumanitarianassistancewasdedicatedtoensuringthattheneedsofaparticularvulnerablegroupindisaster-affectedpopulations–olderpeople–aremet.

Children,definedbythoseundertheageof18,makeupatleast50%ofaffectedpopulationsinmostoftheemergenciesaroundtheworld.Humanitarianassistancethatdoesnotassessandaddresstheneedsofchildrenmaybeignoringthemajority–andwouldthereforepotentiallybefailingtohavethegreatestimpact.

AmnestyInternationalreportedthatwomenandgirlslivinginthemakeshiftcampsinHaitioneyearafterthedevastating12January2010earthquakefacedanincreasingriskofrapeandsexualviolence.Thecampsprovidedshelterandaccesstobasicservicesintheimmediateaftermathbutnoadequateprotectionforwomenandgirls.

GenderAccountabilitycannotimprovewithoutthehumanitariansystembecomingmoregenderaware.Povertyexperiencedbywomenandmenisshapedbyinequalitiesthatdiscriminateagainstandmarginalisecertainsocialgroups.Themostpervasiveoneisgenderinequalityandthisismagnifiedbytheimpactsofclimatechangeanddisasters.26AstudybytheLondonSchoolofEconomicsshowsthatnaturaldisastersandtheirsubsequentimpactonaveragekillmorewomenthanmenorkillwomenatanearlierage.27

Anapproachthatdoesnotrecognisethatwomen,men,girlsandboysinanemergencysituationhavedifferentneedsandareexposedtodifferenttypesofriskwillinthebestcasebebadqualityprogramming,intheworstcaseitcancauseharm.Projectsthataregenderblindriskmissingoutonthemostvulnerableindividualsandmayalsoprovideaninappropriateresponseduetolackofanalysisandlimitedunderstandingofwhatthegenderspecificneedsare.

Atthesametime,theroleofwomeninprevention,reliefandrecoveryisnotrecognisedenough.Previousevaluationsshowthatwomendrivethemovefromimmediateconcerns–reunitingfamilies,findingshelterandfood–toidentifyingwaystogenerate

25 HelpAge(2010).Astudyofhumanitarianfinancingforolderpeople.London.26 Gender,DisasterRiskReductionandClimateChangeAdaptation:ALearningCompanion,

OxfamDisasterRiskReductionandClimateChangeAdaptationResources,2010.27 TheGenderedNatureofNaturalDisasters:theimpactofcatastrophiceventsonthegender

gapinlifeexpectancy1981–2002.LondonSchoolofEconomics.

30


income.Andwomenhaverepeatedlyledinitiativestoadapttotheimpactsofclimatechange,andtheirknowledgeandresponsibilitiesrelatedtonaturalresourcemanagementhaveprovencriticaltocommunitysurvival.28Womenandgirlsneedtobeconsultedontheirneedsimmediately,appropriatelyandcomprehensivelythroughoutallstagesofassistance.

Recommendations

DFID should:

13 Promote and support mechanisms to give recipients of aid a greater voice.

14 Promote the development of improved needs and robust impact assessments.

15 Workwithotherstocreateanover-archingsetofstandardstoassessbeneficiaryaccountability.

16 Encouragethespreadofbestpracticeinthisarea.

17 Givegreateremphasistobeneficiaryaccountabilityfactorswhenmakingfundingdecisions.

4.6 Partnership

TheUKisnotalargedirectgiverofhumanitarianassistance,preferringinsteadtoworkwithandthroughpartners.Thisreviewendorsesthisapproach;partnershipwillbecomeevenmoreimportantasourinterconnectedworldgetsmoresoandaspowershiftstowardsthenewemergingeconomiessuchasBrazil,China,IndiaandtheGulfStates.TheUKcanachievemorethroughandwithpartners,usingitsresourcestobringtogetherorganisationswithdifferentskillstorespondtoacuteneed.Inthemodernworldthemostimportantpartofwhatanorganisationcandoiswhatitcandowithothers.

ManyofthepartnersDFIDworkswithinhumanitarianresponseareworld-classorganisations.Amultilateralaidreview,commissionedatthesametimeasthisreview,foundthat80%ofhumanitarianagencieswereeithergoodorverygood.

Nevertheless,thehumanitariansectorinrecentyearshasbeenseenbymanyasaclosedshopwithahandfulofagenciesanddonorsdominating.Whilstsomeofthishasbeenforgoodreason–theneedtobeseenasneutralandimpartialinconflictandbeingabletoaccesspopulationsmostly–someofthisissimplynotworking.Thisreviewconcludesthataseachangeinthinkingisrequired,sothatDFIDrecognisesthatitisthequalityofitspartnershipsthatmatters,asmuchifnotmorethanitsownstandalonecapacity.Itsroleshouldbemore‘networkenabler’thanindividualdoer.

Working with the United Nations and its agenciesTheUnitedNationsasawholeisthelargestpartneroftheUKinhumanitarianemergencyresponse.AsapermanentmemberoftheSecurityCouncil,andafoundermemberoftheUN,theUKhashistoricallybeenactiveinsupportingmultilateralism.Thisreviewhasconcludedthatthispositionshouldbemaintained,withmultilateralresponsethedefaultpositionoftheUKandDFID.

UNagenciesareamongstthelargestdeliverersofhumanitarianaid.TheWorldFoodProgramme(WFP)delivered44billionmealsin2010,mostofitinresponsetoemergenciesorongoingcrises.UNagencieshavethereachandthepresencetodeliver

28 A.Araujoetal(2008),GenderEqualityandAdaptation,IUCN.

31

Findings

aidatscale,andtheirinternationalstatusoftenmeanstheyhaveabetterrelationshipwithgovernment.ThereviewdocumentedsomeexcellentexamplesofUNagency-ledresponse;fromWFPrapidlydeliveringfoodto7millionpeopleinfloodhitPakistan,toUNICEFsupplyinginfantfoodnationallyforstarvingchildreninNiger.Therehavealsobeenfailures,notablytheinabilitytotreatandcontaincholerainHaiti.

Thesectionsonleadership,finance,accountabilityandimpactinthisreviewmakethepointthatthereisstillmuchworktobedonetoimprovetheperformanceoftheinternationalsystem.Clusterleadershipneedstobeimproved,theUNagenciesneedtobettersupportOCHAandtheERC,andneedtoworkmorecollegially.Agenciesneedtogetbetteratreportingresultsratherthanwhattheyhavepurchased.

DFIDneedstosupporttheseefforts.Asoneofthemajordonors,itneedstoprovidegreaterpredictabilityoffundingsothatthemainUNagenciescaninvestintheirhumanitarianresponsecapacities.Itisdifficulttokeepstaff,chartcareersandinvestinpeopleifyoudonotknowwhetheryouwillhavemoneynextyear.Agenciesneedmulti-yearfundingtomaketheseinvestments.ButDFIDcanalsolinkthismoreclearlytoresultsandperformance.Themultilateralaidreviewcanbeagoodbasistostartthisrebalancingoffunding.

ThisreviewconcludesthatalongsidemorepredictablecorefundingtheCERFisavaluablemechanismandshouldcontinuetobesupportedandexpanded.ItalsoconcludesthatNGOsneedsimilarsupport.PooledfundsliketheoneinDRCongohavegenerallyworkedwell.Astheyapplymostlytoprotractedcrisesthereviewhasnotstudiedtheseindepth,excepttogenerallyendorsethisapproach.

UNagenciesarethebackboneofmanyresponses,andtheUKisconsistentlyoneofthelargestcontributors.Thedefaultpositionofmultilateralismmeanstheseagenciesneedsupporting,asdoestheoverallinstitution.Butsupportcannot,andshouldnotbeuncritical.Agenciesmustcollaboratewitheachother,withgovernments,withNGOsandwithUNappointedleadership.Theclusterapproachisthecorrectvision–strategicnetworksbringingtogetherthemainactorsinvolvedinresponse.Butitsimplementationhasbeentooinflexible.Clustersneedtobegroupedaroundneedratherthanmandate,includingallkeyactors,notjustUNagenciesandinternationalNGOs.Theyneedtobestrategic,andoftentheyneedtoworkonseverallevels.Theyneedtobecreative,decisionmakingbodies,notuninspiringtalkshops.ResourcesfromDFIDshouldfollowsuccessonthesecriteria,andnotberoutinelyallocated.

Working with the European Union TheEuropeanUnioncollectivelyprovideshalfofallofficialhumanitarianaid.Italsohasitsownhumanitarianaidagency,ECHO,whichisthesecondlargestglobaldonorinitsownright.AndalthoughtheUKprovidesasixthofitsfunding,itdoesnotengagewithECHOstrategically.Thisneedstochange.

DFID’spolicylevelrelationshipwithECHOisweak.DFIDandECHOtoooftenworkinparallel,failingtocommunicateeffectively.Thisresultsinduplicationofworkandcostlyoverlaps.IndisastersituationsECHOisroutinelyunawareofwhatDFID’sresponsewillbe.Atpolicylevel,DFIDfocusespriorityattentiononthemajorUNhumanitarianpartnersratherthanotherdonors.ThelackofeffectivepartnershipwithECHOisawastedopportunity.TheUKholdsauniquepositionamongstEUmemberstates,withcapacitytoprovideeffectivehumanitarianaidwhenactingalone.Thisexperienceifbettershared,couldbebeneficialtobothagencies.

AtpresentDFID’srelationshipwithECHOappearstobedelegatedtojuniorstaff.Whatisneededisbetterengagementatpolicylevel,andbetteralignmentatdeliverylevel.DFIDneedstohaveamoreconsistentstrategicdialoguewithECHO.ItneedstobeawareofECHO’sstrategicplanningprocessesandengagewiththese.

32


Mostimportantly,DFIDneedstogetsmarteratsharingresourceswithECHO.Nigerisagoodexampleofhowthiscanwork.ECHOhasstrongtechnicaladvisorypresencethroughitsspecialisedofficesandpermanentrepresentationthroughtheEUdelegation.DFIDreliedonECHOtoleadtheresponse.ButDFIDalsoperiodicallysenthumanitarianadvisorstoreinforceandcomplementECHOleadership.InothersituationsECHOmightfollowaDFIDlead.

Working with bilateral donorsTheUSgovernmentistheworld’slargestindividualhumanitariandonor.Itisveryinfluential,withtheheadsofWFP,UNICEFandtheWorldBanktraditionallycomingfromtheUS.TheUSgovernmentisalsothelargestdonortoUNHCRandtheICRC.

ThismeanstheUShasanopportunitytoinfluenceUNagenciesatahighlevel.ThisisoftennotusedcoherentlybecauseofthefragmentednatureoftheUSaidbureaucracy.Butevenso,DFIDdoesnothaveasustainedpolicydialoguewiththehumanitarianagenciesoftheUSgovernment,andisoftenperceivedbytheUSasaloner.

TheUSwasconsideringasignificantreductionintheamountofhumanitarianaiditgivesasthisreviewwenttopress(40%offoodaidanddisasterresponseby70%).Werethistohappen,forDFIDitwouldmeanthatconversationsaboutburdenshare–similartothosewithECHO–wouldbeevenmorevital.ItwillbeimportanttounderstandwheretheUSwillfocusitsefforts,andtoensurethatscarcehumanitarianresourcesarespreadmosteffectively.WheretheUSwillobviouslylead–Haitiwasagoodexample–thenDFIDshouldbeabletofitaroundthis.

TheGoodHumanitarianDonorship(GHD)grouphasplayedaroleinachievingchangeinthehumanitariansystem.DonorssuchastheNetherlands,Sweden,NorwayandCanadahavebeenclosealliesforDFID.GHDhascreatedaspaceforcollectiveactionthatdidnotpreviouslyexist,andprovidedDFIDwithitsmostconsistentallies.Lately,ithaslostmomentum.DFIDshouldworktoreinvigoratethisgroup,bothgloballyandincountrieslikeDRCongowhereitplaysapivotalrole.

DFIDsharesthebasichumanitarianprinciplesofhumanity,neutralityandimpartialityasastartingpointforpartnershipwithothertraditionalhumanitariandonors.TheprinciplesofGoodHumanitarianDonorship(GHD)bindlike-mindeddonorstogetheraroundafurthersetofcoredonorprinciples.TheGHDgroupisastartinggroundformoreeffectivedonoraction.ButmoreneedstobedonebyDFIDtodemonstrateacollegialapproach.

WideningthegroupwhoadheretoGHDprincipleswouldbeapositivewayforward.DFIDisoneofthestrongergroupmemberswithcapacitytoinfluencehowtobringothersin.TheannualMontreuxmeetingmightbetheforumforthisandcouldpotentiallybewidenedinscopeandambition.

Working with new donor partnersTheworldischanging.Chinaisnowthesecondlargestglobaleconomy.NationssuchasIndia,SouthAfrica,Russia,Brazil,andSaudiArabiaareimportantregionalpowers.Theglobalpictureofwhorespondstohumanitarianneedischangingtoo.Increasingcontributionstodisasterresponsearebeingseenfromdonorsoutsidethe‘traditional’OECDDACgroup.

Allofthenationscitedabovesignificantlyrespondtodisastersintheirregions.China’scontributiontoWFPdoubledin2005andwasoneofthelargestdonorsinBurmaafterCycloneNargisin2008(andinPakistanduringthefloodsin2010).BrazilwasamajorresponderinHaiti.SaudiArabiawasthesinglelargestdonortoBangladeshfollowingcycloneSidr(andwasoneofthetopfiveglobaldonorsin2009).IndiagavethroughmultilateralchannelstoPakistanfloodrelief.

33

Findings

Theemerginggroupofnon-traditionalpartnersisanopportunityforDFIDtoestablishnewrelationships.Todoso,DFIDmustlookforareasofcommongroundthatalreadyexist.Similarviewpointscanbeusedasstartingpoints.Forexample,Brazil’sviewonhumanitarianresponseis,likeDFIDtobuildownershipbyworkingwithlocalauthorities.

DFIDcancombineitsexpertisewiththatofnationsthatregularlyexperiencelargescalenaturaldisasters,andworkwiththemtosharelearningwithotheratrisknations.Russia’sEmergencyControlMinistry,EMERCOMhasvastcapacityandexperience.Indiahasacadreofexperienceddisastermanagersingovernment,followingdisastersinOrissa,GujuratandTamilNadu.China’shandlingoftheSichuanearthquakeresponsewasexemplary.China’scurrent5yearplan(2006–2011)includesdisasterrelief,highlightingtheimportanceofmultilateralcoordination.

Chinahasenormouscapacitytorespondanddeepexperienceofhumanitarianemergencieswithinitsownborders.AnydisastersintheregionoftheHinduKushwilllikelyseeChinarespondinginasignificantway.Toremainahumanitarianleaderintothe21stcentury,DFIDshouldreachouttoseektobuildnewrelationshipswithChinaalongthelinesoftheirrecentWhitePaper.

TheGulfStates,suchasQatar,theUAEandSaudiArabiaaresignificantdonorsinthehumanitarianassistanceandareincreasinglybecominginvolvedinotherways.TheGulfCooperationCouncil(GCC)hasanewhumanitarianmechanism.DFIDisalreadyworkingwiththeGCCandhumanitarianassistanceisagoodareaofcommoninterest.

Inforgingnewhumanitarianrelationships,DFIDshouldnotrisk‘goingitalone’.Alliancesmustbebuiltwithothertraditionalhumanitariandonorstowelcomenewpartnersonboard.SupportmustbecorralledfromwithintheDACgrouptocreateareceptiveforumfornewdonorstojoin.DFIDwillhavetolookwideracrossWhitehalltoinfluenceinthisaction.ClosecollaborationbetweenDFID,FCOandotherWhitehalldepartmentswillbevitaltodevelopopportunities.TheFCO’scapacitytobuildrapidconsensusthroughcablesinsupportofASEAN’sroleinresponsetoCycloneNargisin2008hasalreadybeendemonstrated.DFIDshouldmakemoreuseofthediplomaticnetworksandothergovernmentdepartmentsinordertobuildwidercoalitionsitneedstodrivethroughtheinternationalreformagenda.

DFID’scommitmenttohumanitarianprincipleswillbecomeincreasinglyimportantaspartnershipsaredeveloped.Demonstratingthevalueofthesewillbeanimportantpartofnewrulesforinternationalhumanitariancollaboration.

Working with NGOsTheUKhassomeofthemostrespectedandimportantinternationalnon-governmentorganisationsintheworld.OrganisationslikeOxfamandSavetheChildrenareknownworldwide.TheirworkhashelpedmillionsindisasterfromEthiopia,toBangladeshtoHaiti.Theirpioneeringtechnicalworkhasoftensetthestandardforotherhumanitarianagencies.TheyarehighlyregardedbytheUKpublicandreceivegeneroussupportwhenmassivedisastersstrike.

Non-governmentorganisations(NGOs)alsoprovidemuchoftheimplementationcapacityinhumanitarianemergencyresponse.IndigenousandfaithbasedNGOsareoftenthefirsttorespond,andunderstandbothcultureandcontext.InternationalNGOsareadeptatdeployingquickly,oftensettingupbigreliefoperationsweeksbeforetheUNcranksintogear.In2008NGOsspent$5.7billiononhumanitarianassistance29.NGOsoftenhavelargeprogrammesinaffectedcountriesbeforedisasterstrikes,haveexperienceinresiliencebuildingespeciallyincommunitybaseddisasterriskreductionandmanyworkwithnationalandlocalorganisations.

29 GHAreport2010.DevelopmentInitiatives.

34


ThetermNGOcoversadiversityoforganisations.WorldVisionhadaturnoverof$2.1billionin200630,rivallingUNICEFat$2.7billioninthesameyear.In2006MedecinsSansFrontieres(MSF)spent$575milliononhumanitarianaid.Onlytwogovernments–theUKandtheUS–spentmoreonofficialbilateralhumanitarianassistancethatyear.TheCatholicChurchnetworkCaritas’svoluntaryspendwasequivalenttothebilateralhumanitarianassistanceofSweden,thesixthlargestdonorin2006.Insomecases,asinglememberofanNGOfamilymakesamoresignificantcontributionthanitshostgovernment.Forexample,MSFFrancespentanestimated$81millionoftheFrenchpublic’smoneyonrespondingtocrisesin2006,comparedwithbilateralspendingofonly$48millionbytheFrenchgovernment.

NGOsarealsorapidlygrowinginscaleandgeographicspread.IndiahasamillionindigenousorganisationsthatdescribethemselvesasNGOs.BRACinBangladeshclaimstobetheworld’slargestNGOifnumberofemployeesisconsideredratherthanfinancialturnover.MercyMalaysiahasbecomeawell-knowninternationalNGOrunningprogrammesasfarafieldasAfrica;AfricaHumanitarianActioninEthiopiarunsprogrammesacrosstheHorn.

WhatNGOsrepresentattheirbestiscitizens’action.OrganisationslikeMSFhaveverygenerouspublicsupportacrossEuropeandtheUS,receiving86%oftheirfundsfromprivatedonations.Theirglobalspreadistestimonytotheirenduringappeal.

Forofficialdonorsandtheinternationalsystemthiscreatesbothanopportunityandachallenge.Theincreasedcapacity,especiallyofnationalandlocalNGOsprovidesuntappedpotential.TheHaitiearthquakeprovidesanexamplethoughoftheheadachethattryingtocoordinatetheNGOsectorcanbe,withmorethan1,000internationalNGOsflyingintoPortauPrincereadytohelp.SomeNGOsareanintegralpartofthesystem.SavetheChildrenco-leadstheeducationclusterwithUNICEF;Oxfamprovidespeoplereadytogoforthewaterandsanitationcluster.ButotherNGOseitherdonotknow,ordonotacceptthissystem.Manyturnuplookingforguidance.Otherstrytopushapoliticalagenda.

FaithgroupsareanotherexampleofagrowingNGOsectorwithpotentialtoimproveresponsesthroughtheirstronglinkswithandaccesstolocalcommunities.TheyraiseconsiderabledonationsfromfaithandDiasporacommunitiesoutsidetheDECappeals.

TheinternationalNGOsectorhasgonealongwayintryingtoself-regulate.ThereisanindustrywideCodeofConduct,technicalstandardsforeachsectorofactivityandlotsofworkonaccountability.Unfortunatelythishasnotbeenenoughtostemthetideoffirsttime“wellwishers”,manyofwhomdonotknowaboutstandards,codesandtheideathattheirhelpmightdomoreharmthangood.NeitherhasitmadeanimpactonthecompetitionbetweeninternationalNGOs.AswithUNagenciesthiscompetitionmeansthatassessmentinformationisoftentreatedascommerciallysensitive,leadingtomultiplesurveysandorganisationsjostlingforfundingforparticulargeographicareasortechnicalsectors.

AsaresultofthehumanitarianreformeffortswiththeUN,DFIDhasratherneglectedtheNGOsectorinthelastfiveyears.Latterlythishasbeenchangingwiththeestablishmentofinnovativeconsortia,bothforimprovingrapidresponseandin-countryforlocalNGOs.TheConsortiumofBritishHumanitarianAgencies(CBHA)andtheWestAfricaRegionalHumanitarianFund(WARHF)offertwoprovenmodelsataglobalandregionallevel.Theseareeffectiveandshouldbeexpanded.

DFIDshouldalsoconsider,eitherthroughconsortiaorindividually,investinginNGOswithspecialistresponsecapabilitiestoensurethesecanbedeployedrobustly.Thiscould

30 DIreportfor2009Montreuxdonorsconference.

35

Findings

belinkedtoclusterneedsandresponsibilities(forinstancewithCAREwhosupportthesheltercluster,orMerlinwhohaveco-chairedcountryhealthclusters).

IncountrieswhereDFIDhasapresencethistypeofapproachcanbeextendedtonationalandlocalNGOsandapplytointernationalNGOswithsubstantialpresenceandexperience.ThecivilsocietyfundinDRCongocouldserveasamodel,wherebyoneNGOactsasthegrantholderonbehalfofthecollective.USAIDusesthesetypesof‘umbrellagrants’routinely.AnothermodelisUNDPinBangladesh;anotheristherecentlyformedCBHA.

WhilstthesetypesofapproacheshavethepotentialtoimprovetheeffectivenessofmanyofthebiggerinternationalNGOs,itwillnotsolvetheissueofeverincreasingproliferation.OnepotentialmeasurethathasbeendebatedwithintheNGOcommunityformanyyearsisfor‘accreditation’ofsomesort,allowingaccreditedNGOseasieraccesstocoordinationmeetingsandsoon.ThisideahasbeenresistedonthegroundsthatitwouldbealmostimpossibletoachieveandthatitmightunfairlyexcludeNGOswithrealcapacityorinsighttooffer–especiallynationalNGOs.However,thereviewfindsthatasystemisneededtohelpshortcutsomeofthechaosofcoordinationofNGOs,perhapslinkedtopre-crisisarrangementsandplanning.ThisworkcanonlybeconductedbytheNGOsectoritself.ButDFIDshouldencourage,helpandsupportthisprocess.Whateveritlookslike,ithastohelpaffectedgovernmentsandthosechargedwithcoordinationtounderstandwhereareputableorganisationhasprovencapabilityandhowitcouldbestbedeployed.

Working with the Red Cross and Red Crescent MovementTheInternationalRedCross/CrescentMovementistheworld’slargesthumanitariannetwork.Thereare186NationalSocietieswithaSecretariatinGenevaaswellastheInternationalCommitteeoftheRedCross(ICRC),aprivateSwissorganisationdedicatedtohelpingvictimsofconflict.TheICRCreceivesthelargestamountofDFIDhumanitarianfundingofanysingleagency,at£66millioninfinancialyear2009/2010.

TherelationshipbetweenDFIDandtheRedCross/RedCrescentMovementhastraditionallybeenmediatedbytheBritishRedCrossSociety(BRCS).TheBRCSisoneofthestrongerNationalSocieties(NS)intheMovement,alargecontributortootherNSinitsownright,andastrategicvoiceintheIFRCSecretariat.Forthepastdecade,DFIDfundsforboththeIFRCandICRCpassedthroughtheBRCSinwhatwascalleda‘tripartite’relationship.ThisrecentlychangedfortheICRC–DFIDfundsnowgodirecttoGeneva–butremainsthesamefortheIFRC.

Thedifferentarrangementsreflectthestrengthsandcharacterofthedifferentorganisations.TheICRCiswidelyadmiredforitsprofessionalismanditsadherencetomandate.ItscoreshighlyininternalDFIDanalysis,includingtherecentmultilateralaidreview,andwithcountryoffices.ThismakestheICRCapartnerofchoiceinconflictsituationsandthisreviewendorsesthatview.DFIDshouldcontinuetoworkwiththeICRCasitis,atrustedandprincipledpartnerinconflictsituations.

TheNationalSocietiesandtheIFRCSecretariataredifferent.Thenetworkhastremendouspotential,rootedasitisinitsnationalbase.NationalSocietiesarerequiredtohaveauxiliarystatustogovernmenttobeamember,andinmanycountriesthisisasignificantrole.TheChineseRedCrosshasaround20millionvolunteersandoftenrespondsalongsidethePeople’sLiberationArmyindisasters.TheIranianRedCrescentSocietyistheofficialresponsearmofgovernment,withhugereliefstocksandlogisticsassetsincludinghelicopters.TheAmericanRedCrossisresponsibleformasscareindomesticdisasters.

Butthenetworkdoesnotroutinelyachieveitspotential.Itislessthanthesumofitsparts,withmanyNationalSocietiesthatareunder-resourcedandunder-performing.

36


Particularlyinsub-SaharanAfrica,manyoftheNationalSocietiesaremarginaltotheirnationallifeandincapableoflarge-scalemobilisation.Partlythisisaquestionofresources–whenahighachievingofficerfromtheIFRCSecretariatbecameSecretaryGeneralofaweakperformingNationalSociety,andwasremuneratedataninternationallevel,therewasastepchangeinperformance.Itisalsoaquestionofmanagementandgovernance.

InthenewdirectionrecommendedforDFIDinthisreview,focusingonnationalresilience,thereisamajorroleforRedCrossandRedCrescentNationalSocieties.WorkingthroughandwithNationalSocietiescanbeagoodwaytoengagewithNationalDisasterManagementAgencies,andwithnationaldisasterlegislation.NationalSocietiesareoftenclosetocommunities,throughtheirvolunteernetworksandtheFederationhaspioneeredworkoncommunitybaseddisasterpreparedness.

TheIFRCalsoremainsamassivenetworkfordisasterresponse,oftentheveryfirsttohelpthroughlocalvolunteersandmobilisingthenetworkofNationalSocietiesataregionalorgloballevel.Theirperformanceinresponsehasbeenmixedhowever.ThiscriticalrolecouldbeimprovedwithgreaterclarityoffocusonimprovingtheglobalRedCross/RedCrescentresponsesystemfromtheFederation,andstrengthenedbettercapacityattheNSlevel.

Butthiscanonlyworkifsomeofthefundamentalproblemscanberesolved.WorkingwithandthroughtheBritishRedCrossisasensiblehalfwayhouseforthetimebeing.TheBRCShasauxiliarystatustogovernmentintheUK,althoughinpracticethishasnotoftenbeeninvokedinrecentyears.DFIDshouldworkcloselywithBRCSandtheIFRCSecretariattoinvolvetheFederationinitsresiliencework.ItshouldalsocontinuetosupporttheglobalreadinessoftheFederation.TheBRCScanactasaninterlocutor,giventheotherwisetimeconsumingnatureofapotentialengagement.

TheroleoftheBRCSasanauxiliarycouldbere-invigoratedinotherways.TheBRCSalreadyprovidesadegreeoflegaladviceonthelawsofwartotheMOD;thiscouldbeextendedtoDFID.BRCSalsokeepsanumberofhighqualityemergencyteamsonpermanentstandbyfortheFederation.ThenationalsocietyhasofferedtoextendthistypeofsurgearrangementtoDFID,somethingthatshouldbeexplored.

Working with the private sectorTheprivatesectorrepresentsahugesourceofuntappedcapacityandexpertisetoreducesufferingandhelprebuildcommunitiesintheaftermathofadisaster.Itcanalsohelptomitigatedisasterriskthroughpreventionandpreparedness.Thispotentialmustbeunlockediffuturechallengesaregoingtobemet.

Theemphasisneedstoshiftfromseeingtheprivatesectorasadonortobeinga‘doer’,andasavaluedpartnernotacontractedentity.Newmodalitiesofengagementarerequiredinordertoenablethehumanitariansectortohaveaccesstoskillsandproductsasandwhenrequired.Examplesofthisincludepublic-privatepartnershipsthatenablethesharingofrisks,creditandinvestment(e.g.theCaribbeanCatastropheRiskInsuranceFacility,theBritishEarthquakeConsortiumforTurkey).

Butthereisstilldistrustfromthehumanitariansectorthatcharacterisesitselfas‘non-profit’towardsprivatesectororganisationswhoseprimemotivationisperceivedas‘profit’.Thisbarriertocollaborationneedstobeovercome,andDFIDshouldbeactiveinhelpingtoachievethis.Theprivatesector’smotivationforengagementisbasedonawiderbusinessinterest,includingbrand,newmarkets,corporatesocialresponsibility,andstaffmotivation.Andinviewofthisfirmsareoftenwillingtoengageonareducedrateor‘atcost’basis,asforexamplewithDigicellinHaiti.HumanitarianorganisationssuchasMapActionandRedRrelyontrainedpersonnelfromtheprivatesectorbeingavailablewhenneededforcriticalshort-termassignmentsintheimmediateaftermathofadisaster,oftenonavolunteerorpartialcostbasis.

37

Findings

Companiesandgovernmentshaveoutsourcedservicesforyears,concentratingontheircoreadvantage.Thehumanitariansectoralsohasasetofquasi-commercialrelationshipsinitsgrant/recipient/sub-contractingmodel.Protectionistrhetoricneedstobereplacedwithafocusonwhocandowhat,mosteffectively.Again,DFIDshouldencourageandstimulatethisprocess.

Thecurrentmodelsofprivatesectorengagementinhumanitarianactiongenerallyfocusonlargemultinationalcompaniesandinvolvepro-bonocontributionsoftheirproducts,skillsandexpertisetoresponseoperations.Thisismostlyinthesectorsoflogistics,ITandcommunication,mapping,engineeringandmedicalsupplies.ThebestknownexampleinthesectoristhecollaborationofAgility,TNTandUPSinprovidinglogisticsandtransportationservicestoWFP.Therehavealsobeenproactiveeffortsbytheprivatesectortobetterunderstandhumanitarianaction,andvariousinitiatives,suchastheWorldEconomicForumDisasterRiskPartnershiptofacilitateaccesstoprivatesectorexpertiseinengineeringandconstruction.

Theprivatesectorcanbringprofessionalism,leadershipandmanagementbestpractice,toolsfordrivingefficiencyandmanagingrisk,andtheuseofcuttingedgetechnologyandinformation.Suchskillsneedtobecontextualizedtothechallengesofpost-disastersituationsthroughworkinginpartnershipwithhumanitarianorganisationsandbuildinglong-termcollaborativerelationshipsthatenableknowledgetransfer.

Recognitionofthevalueoftheinternationalprivatesectorneedstobematchedwithunderstandingoftheimportanceoflocalbusinessesandcompaniesinimmediateresponseandincatalysingeconomicrecovery.Thisimportanceislikelytochangesignificantlywhencashtransfersbecomemoreprominent.

Thelocalprivatesectorisusuallythefirstthatcanrespondwithreliefitemsandfood.Itcanprovideemploymentandcontributetonormalisation.HindustanConstructionCompanyinIndiahasbeenabletorespondtofloodsinOrissaandfloods/landslidesinLaddakhwheretheyhadconstructionsites.Notablyitisnationalcompanieslikethesewhohavethecapacitytorespondaswellastherelationshipswiththelocalgovernmentandcommunity.

InHaiti,theruralhinterlandwasnotmuchaffectedbytheearthquakeandmarketsresumedquickly.Large-scalefoodaidwasneverthelessimported,withapotentiallydetrimentaleffectontheagriculturaleconomy.

Thelocalprivatesectorcanalsoprofiteerfromdisasters.ThereisevidencethatNiger’scerealmarketisstrictlycontrolledbyarestrictedgroupoftraders.Thesetraderskeepcerealsoutofcirculationuntilthemaximumpriceisreached.

Alltheseexamplesshowthatpositiverelationshipswiththeprivatesectorneedtobeestablishedpre-disastersothattheycanbebestusedwhendisasterstrikes.InDFID’sresilienceandpreparednesswork,thelocalandnationalprivatesectorneedstobeakeypartner.

Disastersareincreasinglytakingplaceinurbanenvironments.Urbanenvironmentsarecharacterisedbyahighconcentrationofprivatesectorinterests(markets,labour,thesupplychain).Urbanareasarealsodependentoninfrastructureforthedeliveryofessentialservices(water,solidwastemanagement,sanitation,drainage,energy)Damagedinfrastructureneedstoberapidlyreinstatedandissueslikerubbleremovalarecriticaltomakinglandavailableforcamps,andintegratedurbanplanningisneededinordertoprovideabasisforrecoveryandreconstruction.ReinstatingtheseisoutsidetheskillssetofNGOsorUNagencies,andfundingandprocurementbarriersoftenpreventsuchskillsbeingaccessedinatimelyfashionfromtheprivatesector.

Local,nationalandinternationalcompaniesholdtheknowledgeandexpertisetorespondtourbandisasters.Theycouldbeofgreatvaluetohumanitarianorganisations

38


operatingoutoftheirtraditionalareasofexpertise.Thereareexamplesofmunicipalgovernmentsturningdirectlytotheprivatesector,forinstancetheDujiangyanMunicipalGovernmentaftertheChineseearthquake,andapublic-privatepartnership(PRES)betweenArauco,theministryofhousingandlocalmunicipalityinSantiago,Chile.

DFIDhassetupanewPrivateSectorDepartmentinJanuary2011tohelpraisethelevel,extentandeffectivenessofDFID’sengagementwiththeprivatesector.Thisisanexcellentinitiative.Existingandnewprogrammescouldaddressmanyoftheissuesraisedabove.FacilitiessuchasthePrivateInfrastructureDevelopmentGrouportheBusinessInnovationFacilitycouldhavehumanitarianwindows.Knowledgegenerationanddisseminationactivitiescouldincluderelevanthumanitariancases.Andwhereappropriate,CHASEandthePrivateSectorDepartmentcouldworktogetherongalvanisingprivatesectorexpertisearoundspecificopportunitiesthatneedunblocking.Anexamplewouldbefastinfrastructurerehabilitationinurbanareas.Anothermightbeencouragingtheprivatesectortohelpstrengthenthehumancapacityoflocalgovernmentsandstructurestomanageemergencies.

Working with the militaryThemilitaryhaslongbeeninvolvedindisasterreliefoperations.Domesticmilitaryareoftenthefirstresponseofgovernment.Internationalmilitaryinvolvementindisasterreliefhasbeenmorecontentious,especiallywherethereareobviouspoliticalormilitaryobjectives.Buthumanitarianworkersneedtobeabletoacknowledgeareasofmilitarycomparativeadvantageandrecognisewheretheycanworktogether.Itisvitaltoupholdhumanitarianprinciples.Itisequallyvitaltousethemosteffectiveresourcesatourdisposaltomeettheneedsofthoseaffected,especiallyifpredictionsofincreasedneedmaterialise. ThereviewtakestheviewthattheBritishmilitarydoeshavearoletoplayinsupportoftheUKresponseledbyDFID.

Itisthenationalgovernment’sresponsibilitytodecidewhethertocallinmilitaryresourcesinsupportofahumanitarianresponse.Thismaybeadecisiontousethecountry’sownmilitaryortoaccepttheuseofforeignmilitary.Inmanycountries,callingintheirownmilitarytorespondtoalarge-scaledomesticdisasteristhemostobviousthingtodo.Aftertheearthquakeof2005,thePakistanarmywasthefirstresponder,savingthemostlivesbypullingpeopleoutoftherubbleandbyprovidingthefirstreliefitems.Whenbigdisastershit,oftenacountry’smilitaryistheonlyactorwithadequateresourcestorespondatspeedandscale.DFIDshouldrecogniseacountry’srighttouseitsownmilitaryindisasterresponseandbesupportive.

Anationalgovernmentmayrequestassistancefromforeignmilitary.FollowingthetsunamithathitBandaAceh,Indonesiain2004militaryhelicoptersfrominternationalforceswereneededtoreachcutoffpopulationsandmanynationsprovidedmilitaryassetstowardthisoperation.Asubsequentreviewfounditoneofthemosteffectivepartsoftheinitialinternationalresponse31.ChinaprovidedmilitaryhelicoptersandmedicalteamsafterthePakistanfloodsin2010.Theseexamplesdemonstratethebenefitofextramilitarysupportwhendisastersaresolargethatthecombinedresourcesofdomesticmilitaryandthoseoftheinternationalhumanitariancommunityareinsufficienttomeettheneedsoftheaffectedpopulation.

Inarmedconflict,orsensitivepoliticalsituations,usingmilitaryassetsassociatedwithpartiestotheconflictcancompromisetheperceivedneutrality–andthereforesafety–ofhumanitarianworkers.Thereisanobviousneedtobeabletodistinguishbetweenthesesituationsandmakesensiblepolicydecisionsbasedoncontext.Indisasterscausedbynaturalhazard,attherequestofgovernmentandwithclearcomparativeadvantage,

31 TECcoordinationstudy:www.alnap.org/initiatives/tec/thematic/coordination.aspx

39

Findings

militaryplanningandassetscanbehugelybeneficial.Inconflict,thisisnotusuallythecase,althoughUNmandatedforcescanhelpinsecuringhumanitarianaccess.

Twoinstrumentscurrentlyexisttoguidetheappropriateuseofmilitaryresourcesinhumanitariansituations,the‘Oslo’guidelinesfordisasters,andtheUNguidelines32forconflict.TheOsloguidelinesestablishtheprincipleof‘lastresort’.Thisisusefulasitmakesgovernmentsandpolicymakersthinktwicebeforedeployingmilitaryforces.ThisreviewhasconcludedthattheOsloguidelinesarestillrelevant.DFIDshouldinterpretandwherepossibledefinetheprincipleoflastresortas,‘onlyusingmilitaryassetswhennothingelsewilldo’.Thiswillopenthedoortotheuseofnichecapabilities,withoutopeningthe‘floodgates’tounwelcomedeploymentofmilitaryassetsforeverybigemergency.

NichecapabilitiesoftheBritishmilitarymayincludestrategicplanningandsurgedeployment.Itmayalsoincludeagreateruseofmilitaryassets.Thereisanassumptionthatthiskitistooexpensive.Therealissueiswhetherthereareessentialassetsforsavinglivesthatcannotbesecuredintimeanyotherway.

InconflictsituationsdeploymentofmilitaryassetsshouldbeinlinewiththeUNguidelines.Butthereisawiderpointabouthowhumanitariansengagewithmilitaryforces,andthedifferencebetweenthem.Whenmilitaryforcescontrolareasthereisaneedforahumanitariandialoguetoensurepopulationsinneedcanbeaccessed.ManyUNforcesareroutinelygivenmandatestoprotectcivilians,andinsuchsituationshumanitarianorganisationsneedtoworkwiththem.33

Recommendations

DFID should:

18 Reach out to create new partnerships with new donor partners (including China, India, Brazil and the Gulf States).

19 Maintain its default position that humanitarian response is multilateral33. In particular it should:

• EngagemoreeffectivelywithECHOonapolicylevel,andexplorethepossibilityofco-financing.

• WorkwithotherstosupporttheUNEmergencyReliefCoordinatorinthereformofOCHAandthesystemmorewidely.

20 WorkwithpartnerstopromotedonorcoordinationandrevitalisetheGoodHumanitarianDonor-shipgroup.

21 EnsurethatthenewPrivateSectorDepartmentgivesfullconsiderationtothoseareaswhereprivatesectorexpertisecanimprovehumanitarianresponseeffectiveness,includingatthecountrylevel.

22 UsemilitaryassetsinsituationswhereareconsistentwithOsloguidelinesandoffercapacityotherscannot,orprovidebettervalueformoneythancommercialalternatives.

23 WorkwithNGOstopromotetheconceptofaccreditationorcertification.

32 MilitaryandCivilDefenceAssets(MCDA):http://www.coe-dmha.org/media/guidance/3mcdaguidelines.pdf

33 Seesection5.2forrecommendationonfunding.

40


4.7 Humanitarian space

Whenthereisconflict,wherestateshavefailed,whengovernmentsarebelligerentorvenalDFIDcannotworkdirectlythroughtheauthorities.Insuchcasesthereisafragile‘space’inwhichhumanitarianagenciesareacceptedandworktohelpthosemostinneed.DFIDneedstodowhatitcantonurtureandexpandthisspace;byobservingthekeyprinciplesofhumanity,impartialityandneutrality,andbyleadingwhereithasinfluencetoensureothersdo.

Humanitarianprincipleshaveevolvedovertimetohelpagenciesaccessandprotectpopulationsmostatrisk.Wherethoseagenciesareseenasneutral,impartialandindependenttheycanbuildtrustwithcombatants,allowingthemtodeliveraid.Whereaidislinkedtopoliticalormilitarygoalsthesecurityofstaffcanbecompromised,makingitdifficulttoreachthosemostinneed.

ThisreviewconcludesthatDFIDhumanitarianpolicyshouldbetoprotectandwherepossibleenlargethisfragilespace;toworkwithagenciesthatcanaccessandhelpthoseindireneedandtocontinuetoresistthepoliticisationofhumanitarianaid.Thereviewalsorecognisesthatincomplexconflicts,andthebreakdownofstateauthoritythattherewillbetimeswhenmilitaryforce,mandatedbytheUN,willbeneededtoprotectciviliansandhumanitarianworkers.

Protection of civiliansInconflictsituationsandaftersomedisasters,particularlyinurbanareasciviliansneedprotectionfromviolence.Oftentheneedforsecuritycomesbeforeanythingelse.

Thisreviewwasnotmandatedtoconsiderthefullrangeofconflictsituations,focusingonlyonnaturaldisastersandspikesinconflict.Insituationsofconflict,itisclearthatprotectionofciviliansandhumanitarianaccessisparamount.

TheUKcanplayameaningfulroleinsuchsituations,evenwhereitisapartytotheconflict.Itmustobserveinternationalhumanitarianlaw.Itcanuseitsinfluencetoremindothersoftheirobligationsunderinternationalhumanitarianlawandhumanrightslaw.Itcanworkwithlegitimatehumanitarianagenciestoassistthemintheirrole.AnditcansupporttheworkoftheUnitedNationsinpeacekeeping,byensuringthatpeacekeepingmandatesincludetheprotectionofcivilians,andthatpeacekeepingforcesareresourcedforthis.

InthecasestudyforDRCongo,itwasclearthatUNpeacekeepinghasmadeprogressinitsprotectionwork.Whilsttherecontinuetobehorrificattacksagainstcivilians(massrapesbygovernmentaffiliatedforcestonameone),thepeacekeepingforceunderstandsithasadutytotryandpreventtheseandworkswithhumanitarianstothisend.Thisshouldbereinforced.Itishardforsoldiers,trainedinthetacticsoffightingbattles,tofindwaysofpreventingattacksoncivilians,especiallywhenresourcesarescarce.MobileoperationalbasesofthetypetrialledinDRCongohavemerit,especiallywhencoupledwithwaysforcommunitiestotriggerthem.

DFIDcanworkwithagenciesliketheICRC,theUNHCRandOHCHRtoenablethemtocarryouttheirprotectionwork(visitingprisoners,registeringrefugeesandpromotingrights).InparticularDFIDmustensurethatinconflicthumanitarianbudgetsfundneutralandimpartialagencies,andsubstitutionofbasicserviceswhereappropriate.

DFIDcanworkwiththeUN,includinginpeacekeepingassetoutabove.Thisistechnicalwork,andhasmerit.Thebiggerpictureisthatconflictispolitical.Humanitarianworkcannotbethestickingplasterforalackofpoliticalaction.

CasestudiesinDRCongo,GazaandBurmademonstratethelimitedinfluencetheUKworkingonitsownhasinsituationsofconflict.Thesamecasestudiesshow,however,thattherearethingsthatcanbeachieved,especiallyworkingwithothers.InBurma

41

Findings

followingcycloneNargis,workingwiththeASEANgroupofnationsitwaspossibletogainaccessforhumanitarians.InDRCongo,thepatient,patchybuild-upofinternationalhumanitarian,militaryandlegalactiontriestocontainconflictandhelpthoseaffectedbyit.InGaza,DFIDsupportedtheUNincoordinatingaccessadvocacythroughaHumanitarianAssistanceFramework,praisedbyBanKi-Moon.

Aparticularissuerelatingtocounter-terrorismlegislationhasariseninseveralcomplexemergenciesrecently(Somalia,Colombia,SriLankaandGaza)andislikelytocomeupmoreofteninthefuture.DFID,onoccasion,hadtostopfundingthehumanitarianworkofinternationalNGOsandotherimplementingpartnersbecausetheycouldnot100%ensurethataterroristorganisationwouldnotindirectlyordirectlybenefit.Europeanlegallybindinginstrumentsoncounter-terrorismandUKlegislationstipulatethatanybodydirectlyorindirectlyfundingterroristorganisationswillbeprosecutedundercriminallaw.However,exemptionscanbemadebytheEuropeanCouncilonhumanitariangrounds.

Thisreviewfindsthatinthesecircumstances,andinallcasesofconflict,anessentialpriorityistonegotiatehumanitarianaccessonanunimpededbasis.AllpartiesarerequiredtograntsuchaccessunderInternationalHumanitarianLaw.Thisshouldbenegotiatedatthehighestnecessarylevel,andnotlefttofieldworkerstomanageontheirown.Inthecasesabove,thelegalproblemshouldbeovercomebyapplyingforexemptionsonhumanitariangrounds.Thehumanitarianimperativeshouldbeaprimaryconsideration.

Security of humanitarian workersHumanitarianworkisbecomingmoredangerous.Statisticsquotedinthechallengessectionofthisreviewoutlinehowmoreandmorehumanitarianworkersarebeingkilledandwoundedinthecourseoftheirwork.HavingUNinyourtitleandflyingaUNflagonyourvehiclenolongerprovidestheautomaticprotectionitusedto.Partlythisistheresultofamorecomplexandlesscertainworld;insomeplacesitisalsoaperceptionthathumanitarianworkerandeventheUNispartisan.

Theissuesaffectingthesafetyofhumanitarianworkersarebeyondthescopeofthisreview.Whatisclearisthattheyareinmoredanger,andthatprotectingthemisnecessaryiftheworkisgoingtogetdone.

Traditionallyhumanitarianagencieshaveworkedonthebasisofbeingacceptedbythelocalpopulation.Thishasmeantmoreinvestmentinexplainingwhattheyaredoing,andrelyingontheirgoodworkstospeakforthemselves.Thislargelyremainsthecase.Deterrence,asemployedbypartisanmilitaryforcesandforeigngovernmentsinconflicts,islargelycounter-productive.

DFIDneedstoensurethatthoseagencieswithwhichitworkstakesecurityseriously.WiththeUN,thismeanscontinuingtohaveacloserelationshipwithitssecuritydepartment(UNDSS),fundingwhennecessary.WithNGOs,thismeansputtingsecurityintoanyauditingprocessconnectedtopre-qualification,andinvestingininter-agencysecurityinitiativeswhenthesehaveprovenworth.

Recommendations

DFID should:

24 Re-assert the premise that humanitarian action should be based on need, reaffirming the key principles of humanity, neutrality and impartiality in the new DFID humanitarian policy.

25 Ensurefundingismadeavailableforsecurityandriskmanagementforhumanitarianworkers.

42


5. DeliveringtransformationalchangeinDFIDTodeliverthestepchangeinthewayhumanitarianassistanceisconceivedanddeliveredoutlinedabove,DFIDwillhavetomakesignificantchanges.ThemostradicalchangewillinvolveseeinghumanitarianconcernsasacorepartofDFIDprogramming,ratherthansomethingthatneedstoberespondedtowhenithappens.WorkonanticipationandresilienceshouldbepartofDFID’severydayworkincountrieswhereithasapermanentpresence(seesections4.1and4.2).SuchworkshouldalsobeofcentralconcerntoDFID’sdevelopmentpartners,suchastheWorldBankandtheUN.

ThestepchangesoughtbythisreviewwillalsohaveconsequencesforthewaythatDFIDprovidesfundingbeforeandduringhumanitarianemergencies.FundingformultilateralandNGOpartnersneedstobecomemorepredictable,sothattheycaninvestintheskillsandstructurestheyneed.Fundingshouldalsobeavailabledirectlytogovernmentsforresilienceandresponsework,wheretheyarecapable,willingandtransparent.

Asoutlinedintheintroduction,DFIDisashaper,afunderanda‘doer’.Thissectionsetsouthowitshouldengageintheseroles,andlooksattheresourcing,structureandaccountabilitymechanismsitneedsinplace,aswellassomecriticalareasforinvestmentsuchasresearchandinnovation.

5.1 Changing the policy

TheInternationalDevelopmentAct2002isthekeypieceofUKlegislationthatframesoverseasassistance.Intheact,humanitarianassistanceisdefinedas,“assistanceforthepurposeofalleviatingtheeffectsofanaturalorman-madedisasterorotheremergencyonthepopulationofoneormorecountriesoutsidetheUnitedKingdom”.

Inadditiontoitsdomesticlegalobligations,theUKissignatorytoEUandinternationallaw.TheEUconsensusonhumanitarianaidinparticularcommitstheUKto,‘provideaneeds-basedemergencyresponseaimedatpreservinglife,preventingandalleviatinghumansufferingandmaintaininghumandignitywherevertheneedarisesifgovernmentsandlocalactorsareoverwhelmed,unableorunwillingtoact’.

Theconsensusalsosubscribestoanumberofotherprinciplesandcodes.Notablyit‘firmly’commitstothe‘fundamentalhumanitarianprinciplesofhumanity,neutrality,impartialityandindependence’.DFIDhasalsocommittedtotheseprinciplesinits2006humanitarianpolicy.

IftheinternationaldevelopmentactandthekeypiecesofEuropeanandInternationallawdeterminetheoverallframeworkforDFIDhumanitarianaction,thenthe2006humanitarianpolicyisthekeyinternaldocument.Ithadthreepolicygoals:

• Improvetheeffectivenessofhumanitarianresponses.

• Beabetterdonor.

• Reduceriskandextremevulnerability.

Thispolicyneedsupdating,notleastbecauseofthisreview.Anewpolicyshouldbegroupedaroundthemajorthemesidentifiedinthisreviewofanticipation,resilience,leadership,accountability,innovation,partnershipandhumanitarianspace.

Thepolicyshouldalsosetoutwhy,where,whenandhowDFIDresponds.Theconsensusofthisreviewisthatthedefaultpositionforthisresponseshouldbemultilateral,inthatDFIDwillworkwithandthroughitspartners.Wherethescaleoftheneedexceedsregularresources,thenDFIDshouldstandreadytomakeadditionalfundsavailableintothemultilateralsystem.OccasionallyDFIDwillalsoresponddirectly,basedoncomparativeadvantageincludingpresence.Thissuggeststheformulashouldbe:

43

DeliveringtransformationalchangeinDFID

• Why:becauseofinternationaldevelopmentact,EUconsensusandBritishpublicsupport.

• Where:onthebasisofneed.

• When:throughmultilateralpartnersinthefirstinstance.InmegadisastersUKtoroutinelyrespondwithadditionalfundinganddirectdelivery.

• How:throughregularfundstomultilateralandNGOpartners.Whereneedexceedsthislevelofresources,additionalfundingtobeconsidered(basedonadvice).DFIDtoresponddirectlyonlywherethereiscomparativeadvantageoroverwhelmingUKpublicinterest.

Buttheimplicationsofthisreviewgofurther.ThereneedstobeapolicychangeinDFIDonthedevelopmentsidetoo.Thisneedstoplacethecreationofresilienceinatriskcountriesintheheartofdevelopmentprocesses,seennotasa‘humanitarian’activity,butasadevelopmentnecessity.

Recommendations

DFID should:

26 Incorporate resilience into its development policy and programmes.

27 Develop a new humanitarian policy setting out why the UK responds, where, when and how. Thepolicyshouldbuildonthereviewthemesofanticipation,resilience,leadership,innovation,accountability,partnershipandhumanitarianspace.

5.2 Delivering differently

Shaping the International SystemTheUKisamajorcontributortotheinternationalsystem,withthemajorityofitshumanitarianresourceschannelledthroughpartners,asoutlinedinprevioussections.ThismeansthatDFIDhasadirectinterestinmakingtheinternationalsystemwork.Aninternationalsystemthatworksprovidesthebestvalueformoney,andhelpsthemostpeople.

ThisreviewhighlightsinseveralsectionstheinfluencetheUK,throughDFID,exertswithintheinternationalhumanitariansystem.Butthishaswaned.DFIDhasbecometooshrill,andtooinconsistent.Internationalagencieshavecometorealisethatwhilehumanitarianstaffmightbehighlycriticalofanoperation,politicalandseniororganisationalleaderswillnotexpendpoliticalcapitaltofixit.Thesameistrueacrossgovernment.IntheUN,onbudgetarygroundstheUKhasdriventermsofservicechangesthathavemadeithardertorecruithumanitarians.Atthesametime,DFIDberatestheUNfornotdoingmoretorecruithumanitarians.DFID’sinfluenceinbringingaboutmuchneededchangeandreformswillbeincreasedifitspendsmoretimebuildingalliances,andlesstimeactingalone.

Sincethehumanitarianreformsof2005,DFIDhasbeenoneoftheleadingvoicesinpressingforreformsinfinancing,leadershipandcoordination.Thereviewhasconcludedthatthisefforthasbeenbeneficialandshouldcontinue,givingspecialemphasistothechangesinleadershipstructuresandcapacitythereviewrecommends,andwhichtheIASChasrecentlyendorsed.

AnewapproachisneededifDFIDwantstocontinuetoshapetheinternationalsystem.DFIDwillhavetolearntobemorestrategic.HumanitarianadvisorsneedtobesureoftopmanagementandpoliticalsupportbeforeengaginginnegotiationswiththeUNsystemonreform.

44


TheUKmissionsinNewYorkandGenevaarevaluableassets,andwhenusedwellcandeliverimpact.ButDFIDdoesnotuseeithermissionsystematicallyforitshumanitarianlobbyingandalliancebuilding.Thisneedstochange.TheNewYorkmissionhasasizeableDFIDpresence,whichshouldbebetterusedtoplanadvocacy.GenevadoesnothaveaDFIDpresence.ButUKMISinGenevacanneverthelessalsobeusedmoreeffectivelytohelpbuilddiplomaticalliancesinthepursuitofDFID’sreformagenda.

DFIDalsoneedstoworkbetterwithitsdonorpartners,asoutlinedinprevioussectionsofthisreport.WherepolicymessagesarecommonbetweentheUK,ECHOandtheUS,theyarefarmorepowerful.TheGHDgrouphasbeenanengineforchange–theUKneedstoworkwiththisgrouptoseethishappenagain.

AboveallDFIDneedtobemorestrategicinitslobbyingwork.ManyintheUNseeDFIDasthesinglemostinfluentialdonor.TheabilitytoleverageitspositionasthethirdlargestdonortoachieverealchangegivestheUKuniqueopportunities.Theseneedtobecarefullymanaged,notsquanderedinfrustration.Maintainingapositionasatopdonorwillbeessentialifthisinfluenceistoberetained.ButbetteruseofpositionsonUNagencyboards,withinthevariousUNcommittees,andsharperadvocacybyleaderswithinDFIDisneeded.Betterallianceswithestablisheddonorpartnersandthenewemergingeconomieswillbeessential,aswillnewrelationshipswithregionalbodies.

Changing the funding modelThemajorityofwhattheUKgovernmentdoesinhumanitarianassistanceisfundingothers.DFIDhaslongbeenseenasafastandflexiblehumanitariandonor.Thispositionshouldbemaintained.ButDFIDalsoneedstouseitsfundstopromotechange–toensurethatagenciesareequippedtorespondfastanddeliverwhatpeoplereallyneed.

Donorsshapetheinternationalresponsesystembythewaytheyfund.Someofthisisintended,butmostisnot.DFID,asoneofthemostinfluentialdonors,hasapowerfuleffectonthesystem–aslaidoutabove.Butthesystemisnotservingtheneedsofaffectedpeopleaswellasitmight.Fundingisnotproportionatetoneeds,itisnotequitable,itisnotcoordinatedorharmonised,itdoesnotfocusenoughonpreventionanditdoesnotdemanddemonstrableperformanceoffundedagencies.

DFIDcanchangetheincentivesinthewayitfunds,bettershapingtheinternationalsystem.Indevelopmentaid,DFIDhasbeenastrongadvocateofgreateraideffectiveness,throughseveralinternationalinitiatives.ForDFIDtoachievebetterresultsandgreatervalueformoney,thesameprinciplesofaideffectivenessneedtoapplytothefundingofhumanitarianpartners.Astepchangeisneededongreaterpredictability(includingmulti-yearcommitments),coherence,transparency,accountability,focusonresultsandvalueformoney.ThemainpriorityshouldbetoequipDFID’spartnerstobuildtheircapacityandmanagehumanitarianresponse.

DFIDcurrentlyfundsthemultilateralhumanitariansystemthroughacombinationofcorefundingandadditionalnon-corefundingatthecountrylevelforemergencies.Thesplitoverthelastfewyearshasbeenstronglyinfavourofadditionalnon-corefundinginresponsetoUNFlashAppealsforsuddenonsetdisasters.TheBilateralandMultilateralAidReviewsarechangingthissplit.ThroughtheMAR,thebestperformingagenciesshouldreceivesignificantlymorecorefundinglinkedtoresults.TheHERRwelcomesthisandrecommendsthatDFIDtakesafurthersteptowardsmulti-yearcorefundinglinkedtoperformancesothatthemajoragenciesandtheRedCrossMovementgetpredictabilityforfinancialplanningandcapacitybuilding.34

34 Carefulconsiderationwillneedtobegivennottobreachtheruleonfundinginadvanceofneed.

45


Forgreaterglobalequityinallocationsandcoherence,theHERRalsorecommendsahighercontributiontotheCERFlinkedtoresults,inlinewiththeMARfindingongoodperformance.TheCERFshouldbeenabledtofundpreparedness.

Keepingwiththesameprinciplesappliedabovetothemultilaterals,thebestperformingNGOsshouldgetmorepredictablelong-termfundinglinkedtoperformancethroughstrengthenedProgrammePartnershipArrangements.Andforgreaterequityinallocationsandcoherence,theCBHAandotherregional,nationalandlocalconsortia,astheCERF,shouldgetincreasedfundingonamulti-yearbasis.

Asaresultofmorecorefundingformajoragencies,theFlashAppealsandConsolidatedAppealsshouldbecomeproportionatelysmallerovertimeapartfrominexceptionalcircumstances.DFID’scontributiontothemwillalsogodown.However,DFIDneedstoretainitscommitmenttofundinghumanitarianneedsatthecountrylevel.Often,thisiswhereDFID’sseatatthetableprovidesgreatvaluebyimprovingoverallaideffectiveness,asdemonstratedforexamplebyitsinvolvementintheDRCongopooledfund.

Whatisrequiredisastepchangeinlinkingcountrylevelfundingtoperformance.ThisreviewrecommendsDFIDlinksdemonstratingresultsandimpactcloselytofuturecountry/emergencyfunding.Inreturnforanagreedenvelopeoffundingforanemergency,implementingpartnershavetobeabletodemonstrateresultsandreportaccordingly.

AsDFID’scontributiontoECHOisfixed,DFIDshouldlookforwaysofco-financingECHOresponseswherethiswouldaddvalue.

Fast mobilisation funding and pre-crisis arrangementsAparticularchallengeinfundingsuddenonsetdisastersisthefirstweekafterdisasterstrikes,inwhatwerefertointhisreportasthe‘criticalperiod’.DFID’sabilityandwillingnesstoprovidefastfundingtogetthewheelsrollingandenablingthewidersystemtostartprovidingreliefiswidelypraised.ItisoneofDFID’smostimportantandvaluablecontributionstoemergencyresponses.Itdoescomeatacosthowever.HavingtodecidequicklywhattofundandwhatnotanddealingwithmanydifferentfundingstreamscarrieshightransactioncostsforDFID.Butmoreimportantlythecurrentapproachdoesnotprovidetherightincentivesforagenciestodeliverhighqualityworkforthebestvalue.

Oncefundingisapproved,partnershavefewpressurestoprovideinformationonhowtheirprojectwillachievethedesiredimpact,howitwillbeaccountabletobeneficiariesorhowspecificissuessuchasgenderareaddressed.Importantareasofperformancejustgetbox-ticking.Programmeauditsarerarelycarriedout.

Generally,thewayhumanitarianfundingisallocatedactsasa‘complexincentivesystem’,promotingbothpositiveandnegativebehaviours.Oneoftheperverseincentivesitcreatesisforimplementingagenciestoproposethehighestbeneficiarynumberspossiblefromtheirprogrammes.Henceaboxofwaterpurificationtablets‘servesthousandsoffamilies’,wheninfactthisisonlytrueifeachfamilyreceivesahandful–somethingimpracticalinmostdistributionmodels.Inmanyemergenciesinfacttheseboxesusuallyrotinwarehouses.

Nevertheless,agenciesdoneedsubstantialfundingtomobilise–tohirepeople,transport,purchasegoods,useequipmentandsoon.Thesemobilisationfundsareconnectedtothe‘programmes’andsohighlyspeculative‘proposals’aremadesimplytoallowagenciestomobilise.Onceapprovedhowever,thislocksagenciesintoacourseofactionthatmayonreflection(i.e.whentheyactuallyhavetimetomakeaproperassessment),notbethemostjudiciousone.

46


Similarly,whileDFIDasksforgreatercoordination,itoftenfundsimplementingorganisationsindividually,therebycreatingacompetitivedynamicwhichcanerodecollectiveactionandcompromisestheoutcomesfortheaffectedpopulated.

Thenumberofprojectgrantsinemergencieshasalsobecomeoverwhelming,52intheaftermathofCycloneNargisor27afterOperationCastLeadinGaza.Becauseinsuchcomplexemergenciesobjectivesandcontextschangefrequently,DFIDdoesneedvariedfundingmechanismsandaflexibleapproach.Butthesenumbersoffundingstreamsresultinhightransactioncostsofstafftimeandprovideastrainonhumanresourcestoadequatelymonitorandfollowupprojectsfunded.

Toincreaseitsflexibility,whilstsolvingsomeoftheissuesoutlinedabove,DFIDneedsafundingmodalitythatcanprovidefastmobilisationfundinginthefirstweek.Thisshouldbebasedonpre-qualificationratherthanspeculativeproposals.

Funding recovery from day oneInternationalfundingforemergenciesisusuallysplitintothreelevels.Theimmediatereliefphase,recoveryandreconstruction.The‘criticalperiod’iswheninternationalactorsandmoneypourintocountriesintheaftermathofanemergencytryingtosavelives.Afterthefirstmonth,recoveryneedsassessmentsarecarriedoutandlonger-termhumanitarianprogrammingbegins,targetedatsavinglivelihoods.Adonorpledgingconferenceisheld,typicallywithlessmoneypledgedthanrequired.Andthen,thereconstructionphasestartssometimeduringrecoverywithdifferentfundingcomingonstreamfromtheWorldBankandIMFoftentorepairpre-existinginfrastructure.

Whatthissplitfundingmodelhascausedisafalsedichotomyinseparatingrelieffromrecoveryandreconstruction.Thisreviewhasfoundthatwhataffectedpopulationswantandneedmostisanimmediatestarttolivelihoodsrecovery.Theneatdonorsplitdoesnotworkforthem.Evaluationsshowthatwomen,forexample,drivethemovefromimmediateconcerns–reunitingfamilies,findingshelterandfood–toidentifyingwaystogenerateincomeveryquickly.OrtheexamplefromCycloneNargisinBurmaoftheprivatesectorsellingthepotsandpansthatenabledthepreparationofcookedfoodandareturntonormallongbeforetheinternationalpotsandpansarrived.Bythen,beneficiarieshadincurreddebtunderminingtherecoveryoftheirlivelihoods.Thevalueformoneyofthereliefitemsdeliveredhasbecomequestionable.

Cash-basedapproachestoacceleraterecoveryareonewayoutofthisfalsedichotomyandeasethewayintodevelopmentprogramming,forexampleintocashbasedsocialprotectionschemesthatcanreducevulnerabilityandbuildresilienceforthenextcrisis.Evidenceisbuildingupontheeffectivenessofcashresponses.Itisimportantthattheirimpactisassessedinrelationtothesegoals.

Infrastructurerehabilitationisanotherexamplethereviewfounddoesnotgetenoughattentionintheimmediateaftermathofanemergency.Theun-clearedrubbleinHaitihighlightsthis.Theresultinghighercostsofrecoveringlostlivelihoodswillhavetobepickedupbydevelopmentprogrammes.DFIDneedstorecogniselivelihoodsfundingislegitimatefromdayone.

Delivering smarter direct aidInthebiggestemergencies,DFIDcandeliveraidrapidlythroughitsstandingemergencyteam.Itcanalsodeliverhighqualitypeopleintotheinternationalsystem.Bothofthesecapacitiesarehighlyappreciatedandhavebeenproventomakearealdifference.

Inadditiontotheinternalcapacity,DFIDhasacalldownarrangementwiththeUKfireserviceforSearchandRescue.ThisprovidesforoneUNclassified‘heavy’team(64people,dogsandequipment)tobedeployedwithinhoursofbeingcalled.Onoccasion,

47


theUKalsoprovidesmilitaryassetssuchasships,aircraftandhelicopters.InHaiti,DFIDhelpeddeployateamofhighlyqualifiedsurgeonstoworkoncomplicatedtraumawounds.

Alloftheinterventionscitedabovehavevalue.TheSearchandRescueteamsarehighlyvisibleanddemonstratemuchvaluedsolidarity.Theseareespeciallyusefulinthe‘criticalperiod’,lesssoafterwards.FromaUKperspectivesuchdeploymentsofferuniqueopportunitiesforteamstoexperiencearealdisaster–invaluableshouldtherebesomethingsimilarintheUK.ButSearchandRescueunderthismodeliscostlywithover£250,000perlifesavedinHaiti.AndastherearenomajorearthquakefaultlinesclosetotheUK,theycanarrivetoolate.Thesurgicalteamscostaboutonehundredthofthesearchandrescueteams(littleover£2,500)perlifesavedinHaiti.InNigeragenciesspentlittleover£100perchildsavedinfeedingprogrammes.

WhatthismeansisthattheUKneedstobesmartaboutwhereandwhenitdeploystheseassets.Italsoneedstothinkaboutthefuture,asthisreviewmakesclear.TheUKhasotherassetsthatcouldbeharnessedfordisasterresponseas‘nichecapabilities’.Thesame‘resilience’teamsintheUKfireservicehavenuclear,chemicalandbiologicalcapabilities–thesecouldberapidlydeployedincircumstanceswheretheycouldmakearealdifference,ascouldothersciencebasedassets.

WhereUKdirectassistanceconsistentlymakesadifferenceiswiththedeploymentofpersonnel.ThisisoneofthemostcosteffectiveandinfluentialactionsDFIDundertakes.DFIDdeploymentsaretypically‘enablers’–aircrafthandlerstomakesureaidflowsswiftly,informationmanagerstosetupsystemsquickly.Thiscouldeasilybeextended–onoccasionswheretheUKhasdeployedclusterleadsquicklythistoohasmadeahugedifference.DFIDshouldworkwiththeUNtoensureithasthemostneededenablingstaffonstandby(andnotsimplytakerequestsforcheappeoplethroughtraditionalagencystandbyschemes).Itshouldworkwithotherstobetteralignthissurgecapacity(forinstanceNRCandtheBritishRedCross).

DFIDhasalsobuiltanicheexpertisein‘enablingequipment’.Thismightbemachinesforunloadingaircraft,orhighqualitysheltermaterials.Thistooisvaluable,andintheworkrecommendedaroundsupplychainbythisreport,thedirectdeliveryofDFIDshouldberetained.

Working strategically across the UK governmentTheUK’sresponsetointernationaldisastersneedstobecoordinatedacrossgovernmentdepartments.TheresponseisusuallyledbyDFID,andDFIDusuallyprovidesthemajorityofresources.Othergovernmentdepartmentsprovidesupportinwayswheretheyhavedistinctadvantage.ForexampletheFCOandCabinetOfficethroughtheirinformationnetworkscanproviderapidsituationupdatestocomplementthoseofDFID’sownstaffandagencycontacts.TheNHSprovidessurgeonsforresponseinthe‘criticalperiod’.However,evidencefromthereviewsuggestswecandobetteratintegratingtheseseparateinputs.

Thereisforexample,noformalmechanismforconveningallgovernmentdepartmentsinresponsetoaninternationalemergency.ArrangementsbyDFIDaread hocanddepartmentsarecalledinasandwhenDFIDconsidersthereisaneedforwidersupport.Theinformalityofthisarrangementmeansthattherightpeoplearenotalwaysavailableatshortnoticetoattendmeetings.Morejuniorstaffmayrepresenttheirdepartmentthanisideal.Thesepeoplemaynotbeofsufficientsenioritytotakedecisions,andcontinuityofstaffwhoattendmeetingsisnotmaintained.Thiscanleadtoalackofeffectivecommunicationbetweendifferentdepartmentsandafailuretoachieveresults.ForexampletheMODchainofcommandrequiressomeoneoftherightranktoapprovetheuseofanaircraftforreliefsupplies.Iftherightpersonisnotatthemeetingwhenitisrequested,thedecisioncannotbetakenandtimeislost.DFIDmaylookelsewherefortransport.

48


ThereviewunderstandsthatothergovernmentdepartmentsarekeentoprovidesupportinemergenciesandconsidertheyhavemoretocontributethanDFIDisawareof.Thisisparticularlythecaseifotherdepartmentsaregivenenoughtimetoplanandpreparetheirresponse.Incaseswheremoreformalcoordinationarrangementshavebeenmade,crossgovernmentactionhasbeenmoreeffective.ForexampletheresponsetoCycloneNargisinBurma,2008includedthecreationofacross-Whitehallteamforplanningjointresponseoptions.Theresultwasaneffectivebodymadeupofpeopleoftherightsenioritywhowereabletomakedecisionsandactrapidly.

TheNationalSecurityCouncilisthenewmechanismunderwhichcross-governmentdepartmentsareconvenedundertheauthorityofthePrimeMinister.AsimilarbodythatcoulddrawtogethergovernmentdepartmentsundertheauthorityofthePrimeMinister,chairedbyDFIDandconstitutedunderstricthumanitarianprincipleswouldprovidethenecessarycoordination.AwayshouldbefoundthroughtheexistingNationalSecurityCouncilmechanismtoconveneastandingcommitteeonhumanitarianemergencyresponsetodothis.

Recommendations

DFID should:

28 Change the funding model to achieve greater preparedness, pre-crisis arrangements, capacity, performance and coherence by:

• Increasingpredictablemulti-yearfundinglinkedtoperformancetomajorUNagencies,theRedCrossMovementandNGOs.

• Increasinglong-termsupporttointernational(theCERF)andcountrylevelpooledfundsandtoglobal,regionalandcountrylevelNGOconsortia,suchastheCBHAandWAHRF.

29 Design fast and flexible funding models for emergency responses:

• ProvidefastmobilisationfundingintheCriticalPeriodbasedonpre-qualificationratherthanspeculativeproposals.UsetheprocesstoreducebureaucracyinthisCriticalPeriod.

• EnsurerecoveryandlivelihoodsfundingisconsideredduringandimmediatelyaftertheCriticalPeriod,ratherthanlaterashastraditionallybeenthecase.

• Ensurethereisflexibilityoffundingasfastmovingsituationschange,perhapsbyprovidingitinstages.

30 Useallnewfundingmodelstoenforcestandardsandlinkfundingtoperformancethroughclearimpactassessmentsandreporting.Carryoutindependentperiodicprogrammeauditsandafteractionreviewstoinformfuturefundingdecisions.

31 Develop and deploy niche capabilities in a more focused way where they add value:

• OnlyusesearchandrescueinsituationswheretheUKcangenuinelyaddvalue.

• Incorporatesurgicalteamsintofirstphasedeploymentsespeciallyafterearthquakes.

• Investigatenewformsofnichecapabilitiesthatcanrespondtonewtypesofthreatssuchasnuclear,biologicalandchemical.

32 ContinueandexpandthesurgeofUKcontractedpersonnelintotheinternationalsystem.

33 Conveneandleadastandingcross-governmentemergencymechanismformegaemergencies,usingtheauthorityoftheNationalSecurityCouncil.

49


5.3 Changing the structure, shifting resources

HumanitarianemergencyresponsehashistoricallybeenundersupportedwithinDFID.ThehumanitariancadrewasonlyrecentlyformedandisthesmallestofDFID’stechnicalnetworksbyamargin.Itcurrentlystandsat12peopleglobally,despitehumanitarianspendingconstituting8%ofoverseasdevelopmentaid(ODA)annually.TheConflict,HumanitarianandSecurityTeam(CHASE)managesallhumanitarianissues,includingresponse.Astheconflictportfolioofworkincreases,themanagerialloadhasbecomeincreasinglyuntenable.Despitealargeresearchbudget,DFIDdoesnotsupportsignificanthumanitarianresearch.

Theemergency(rapid)responsecapabilityhasbeenoutsourcedonathreeyearrollingcontractualbasis.Thecontractcurrentlyprovidesfor27staffsharedwiththeStabilisationUnit.Therearesixdedicatedhumanitarianstaffonthecontract.Italsopaysforasignificantlogisticalstandingcapacity–cars,communications,specialistdeploymentequipmentandsoon.ThiscapabilityiscalledtheOperationsTeam(OT)andisco-locatedwithCHASE,withOTstaffintegratedintotheDFIDmainoffice.WhilsttheinternationalreputationoftheOTisextremelyhigh(andmuchenvied),inrecentyearscorporateworkhasbeenincreasinglyundertakenbytheteamasaresultoflackofcapacitywithinDFID.

ThelackofcapacitywithinbothCHASEandOThasmeantclear,strategicdirectionhasbeenmissing,astheworkhasbeenalmostconstant‘fire-fighting’.Theimpactofsuccessivelarge-scaleemergencieshasbeentostretchresourcesstillfurther.ThislackofstrategyisnotconfinedtoCHASE.HumanitarianactionisspreadacrossDFIDinalargelyunconnectedandad hocfashion,andthereisnoseniorchampion.UntilrecentlytherewasaseparateAfricaConflictandHumanitarianUnit(ACHU)withinAfricadivision.ACHUoversawanAfricaemergencyreservefundandhadnoformalconnectionwithCHASE.Countryofficescanchoosewhethertohavehumanitarianadvisors,eveninhigh-risksituations(Pakistanhadaconflictadvisorwithresponsibilityforhumanitarianbutnoexperienceinthisarea).

Thedisparateandneglectedstructuredoesnotonlyhaveaneffectonoverallstrategy,ithasledtoaschismbetweenthepolicyfunctionandtheresponsemechanisms.ThesmallteamofhumanitarianpolicyadvisorscentrallyholdlongtermfundingrelationshipswithbigagencieslikeUNICEFandUNHCR,butitistheOTstaffthatseehowtheseagenciesperforminsuccessiveemergencies.Thishasledtomixedmessagesandlostopportunities.

PartnersremainhighlypositiveaboutDFIDandvalueboththequalityofthepersonnelanditsabilitytoreactquicklyandflexibly.ThereisdemandforDFIDtobepresentinlarge-scaleemergenciesasitsabilitytoinfluencetheoverallstrategyismuchvalued.Thereisalsodemandforacontinuedcapacitytodeploybothpeopleandgoodsintotheinternationalsystematshortnotice.

Inparalleltothisreview,DFIDalsoundertookabilateralaidreview(BAR)thataskedcountryofficestopredicttheirexpenditureforthenextfewyears.Inthisexercisehumanitarianspendwasforecasttofall,orrathercountryofficesdidnotmakeabidforhumanitarianresourcestorise.Thismightreflectanaturaloptimism–thatthingswillgetbetterorthatdevelopmentgainswillmeantheimpactofhumanitarianemergencieswillbediminished.However,itisoutofstepwithmostforecastsofneedandmayalsoreflectadesire‘nottobeinvolved’;anideathatDFID’scorebusinessisdevelopmentandthathumanitarianemergenciesareanunwelcomedistraction.ItmayalsoreflectanassumptionbycountryofficesthatCHASEwillrespondifthereisanemergencyandtheresourceswillbemadeavailablecentrally.

Tosomeextentthisassumptioniscorrect.Thisreviewconcludesthatforoverwhelminglylargeemergencies,‘megaemergencies’,responseshouldbeledfrom

50


London.TheintenseinterestfromacrossgovernmentandfromthepublicmeansthatitisnecessaryforLondontoleadonstrategy.Wherethereisacountryofficetheyshouldleadondelivery,althoughDFIDshouldalsooperatea‘stepaside’policysimilartothatbeingadvocatedwiththeUN,wherebyitensuresthatdeliveryisledwiththerequisitelevelofexperience.Formediumandsmall-scaledisastersthecountryofficesarewellplacedtolead,perhapswithsometechnicalorlogisticalsupportfromCHASE.

ItalsomeansthatDFIDneedstomakebettersenseofitsinternalstructureandstrategy–reflectingtheimportanceofitshumanitarianworkinstructure,capacityandresourcesaswellasinrhetoric.IfbuildingresilienceistobecomeacorepartofDFID’sworkasthisreviewsuggests,thenbothseniormanagementandthecountryofficeswillneedtoreflectthisinthewaytheyworkandplan.IftheperformanceoftheinternationalsystemistrulytobeimprovedthenDFIDwillneedtomakebetteruseof(andincrease)itshumanitarianstaffanditsoperationsteam,andwillneedtoexpandthiscapability.IfDFIDisgoingtopromoteinnovation,buildnewpartnershipsandenablenewnetworksofhumanitarianpolicyandpractice,thenitwillneedtobebetterintegrateditself,usingitspolicydivisiontopromoteresearchandevidence,itscountryofficestoworkwithgovernmentsandUKmissionstoworkwithothernations.

Managing the responseHumanitarianemergenciesarechaoticandfastmoving.Theyneedexperiencedmanagerswithclearauthoritytobeincharge.

DFIDhasasystemof‘responsemanagement’butitisdiluted.ThisisduetotheseparationofthecontractedoutOperationsTeamfromthemanagementofCHASE.Partlyalsoitisbecausethisskillhasnotbeenprioritised.Thenewsystemmusthaveexperiencedresponsemanagerswithdelegatedauthority.

Aneffectiveresponserequiresclearlinesofauthorityandresponsibility,andaclearstrategy.Theproductionofawiderangingstrategyincludingfunding,lobbying,cross-Whitehallworkandanydirectassistance,shouldbeapriorityfortheresponsemanagement.Theownershipoftheresponsestrategyshouldbeatasufficientlyseniorlevel.InamegaemergencythiswouldbeatDirectororDirectorGenerallevel.

AcomparativeadvantagethatDFIDhaslongenjoyedisthequalityofitsadvisorycadre.ThereisaneedforDFIDhumanitarianadvisorstobedeployedtoemergencies.Theycanhelpshapetheresponse,andsafeguardUKtaxpayerinvestments.TheycanalsoprovidevaluableanalysisandinsighttoLondon.Thisisnottruejustinmega-emergenciesbutalsoinemergingcrisesandconflict.

Managing riskHumanitarianemergenciesarehigh-riskenvironments.Theyarechaoticanduncertainanddecision-makinghastoberapid.Thereismorechanceofgettingthingswrong.Theremustbeagreatertoleranceforriskinsuchsituation.

Butthereareoftengreaterriskswithdoingnothing,orrespondingtooslowly.Humanitarianemergenciesarehighriskbecausetheyinvolvelifeordeathsituations.Slowdecision-making,ornotreacting,canleadtolossofbothlivesandopportunities.Politicallythereislessriskinamessyresponse,oranaccusationofwaste,thanbeingaccusedoflettingpeopledie.

Theconsequencesofthisarethatproceduresneedtobestreamlinedforhumanitarianemergencies,anddecision-makingneedstobedelegated.Empoweringthosewiththeinformationtomakeadecision,andtoimplementitfastisessential.HistoricallythishasbeenacknowledgedwithinDFIDandprocedureshavebeenmodified.Thistraditionneedstocontinue.

51


Thisreviewsetsoutseveralmeasuresforimprovingaccountabilityintheinternationalhumanitariansystem.Connectedtothisistherequirementforagenciestodemonstrateresults,andprovetheyaregoodvalueformoney.ButthiscannotcomeattheexpenseofrapidresponseorifDFIDhumanitarianstafffeelafraidtomakedecisions.

Recommendations

DFID should:

34 Ensure that the structure, funding and human resources for humanitarian work reflects its move to being a central part of DFID work, not least by having a Director General champion this work. Amongst others, this will require:

• RebalanceresourceswithinDFIDtomeetthechallengesofrisinghumanitarianneed.

• Expandthehumanitariancadre,bothinLondonandinthefield.

• Ensuringeveryresponsetorapidonsethumanitarianneedisledbyanexperiencedresponsemanager,withsufficientdelegatedauthoritytoensureswiftaction.

• Leadlarge-scaleresponsesfromLondon,managedbyCHASE.

35 Redefinetheobjectivesforthecontractedresponseteamsothatitissolelydedicatedtosupportingrapidresponseandpre-crisisarrangements.

5.4 Driving results and value for money

Thehumanitariansectorhastraditionallybeenreluctanttocollect,systematiseandshareevidenceonwhatworks,whatdoesnotandwhy.Therehasbeenalackofdemandforthiskindofinformation,andsometimesaninabilitytofindanswers.ThereasonsarelaidoutintheImpactsectionabove.

Fundingdecisionsarenotroutinelybasedonevidence.Andwhenfundingdecisionsarebasedonevidenceofresults,itisoutputsratherthanimpactthatarebeingconsidered.

Withoutgreaterclarityonresults(bothonwhatistheevidenceandwhatisthehumanitarianobjective),itisnoteasytodeterminethevalueformoneyofhumanitarianactions.Andithasrarelybeentried.

Valueformoneyisabouttheoptimaluseofresourcestoachievetheintendedoutcomes.Itisabouttheoptimumcombinationofcostsandqualityofthegoodsandservicestomeettheneedsofbeneficiaries.AsinallotherareasofHMGspending,itisnotjustaboutthelowestcost.

Inahumanitarianresponse,togetvalueformoney,speedisoftheessence.Thereisnovalueinaresponsethatcomestoolate.Liveswillbelost.Therisksoflateornon-interventionneedtobeconsidered.Therefore,timelinessorspeedneedstobeaddedintotheequationonvalueformoney.

ThefigurebelowfromtheNationalAuditOfficeshowstheresultschainthroughitsdarkbluearrows.Andthecostsattachedtotheresultsthroughitslightbluesquares.Valueformoneyanalysishastoincludethiswholechain.

52


Value for money

Economy

Costs (£) Inputs Outputs Outcomes

Efficiency Value for money

Qualitative

Qualitative

Figure6: Value for Money: Costs and results, National Audit Office.

Duringaresponse,therelativeimportanceofthethreekeycomponents,cost,qualityandspeed,hastochangeifthehumanitarianimperativeofsavinglivesistheprinciple.IntheCriticalPeriod,itisspeedthatshouldcountthemost,because,inthisphasespeedsaveslives.Costandqualitythenincreaseinimportancewithtime.

SinceJanuary2011,allproposalsforDFIDfundingmustbeaccompaniedbyaBusinessCase,whichsetsouttheneed,justificationandaffordabilityofanintervention.35Ithasnotbeendevisedthoughforcompletingwithinhoursofadisasterhittingwheninformationisscarceandpeoplearedying.AsDFID’scomparativeadvantageisfastresponse,partnerslooktoDFIDimmediatelyforfunding.

Whilethereviewrecommendsmoreworkonevidenceofwhatworksandwhatdoesnotandcost-effectivenessinhumanitarianaction,thisworkislessrelevantintheCriticalPeriod.However,post-actionreviewsandevaluationscanhelpgreatlytoinformfuturedecisionmakingaboutdeliverypartnersandmechanismseveninthecriticalperiod,throughprequalificationofpartners(seeChangingthefundingmodelinsection5.2).

Valueformoneyinaresponsecanbestbeachievedthroughafocusonachievingresultswithallresources.Beitfromotherdonors,domesticresourcesortheprivatesector.DFID’sresourcesinaneffectivesystemcanachievemuchgreatervalueformoneythaninanineffectivesystem.DFID’simportantroleinmakingthesystemmoreeffective,aslaidoutthroughoutthisreport,isthereforelikelytohavethegreatestimpactonvalueformoney.

InnovationisanotherareawhereDFIDinvestmentcouldreapsubstantialgainsinvalueformoneyinthefuture.DFID’sinvestmentinCommunity-BasedTherapeuticcare(CTC)isagoodexamplewhichhasmadethetreatmentofmalnourishedpeopleinmajoremergenciesmorecost-effectivethantraditionaltherapies.Witharelativelyhighfixedinitialcost,CTCcantreatseveralthousandmalnourishedpeoplewithlittlemorethantheextracostsoffoodandmedicine.Othersubstantialcoststothecommunity(suchastravelcostsandopportunitycostsofbeinginfull-timecare)havealsoreducedsignificantly.

Itshouldnotbeforgottenthatbuildingresilienceisoftenthebestmeansofprovidingvalueformoney.Itisestimatedthat£1inpreventionsaves£4inresponse(seesection4.2).AstheIFRCAnnualreport2008says:‘thereisnoeconomicsenseinspendingmoneyonemergencyresponsealone.Yearsofinvestmentcandisappearinminutesif

35 ThisBusinessCasemodelisbasedonHMTreasuryguidanceandensuresconsistencyacrossUKgovernmentdepartments.

53


riskreductionandpreventionareignored.’36ThisiswhyDFID’sapproachtohumanitarianworkneedstohavepreventionatitscore.

Outcomes and effectivenessThesectiononimpactsetsouttheimportanceofbeingcleareraboutdesiredoutcomesandimpactandmeasuringthem.ButassessingtheoutcomesofDFID’sfundingandinfluencingisfarmorecomplexthanmeasuringoutputs.Andquantitativeassessmentsareastepmoredifficultthanqualitativeones.

JudgingfromthequalitativeassessmentsmadeinevaluationsofDFID’sresponseefforts,DFIDoftengetsitright.Fundingisfast,flexible,goestothesectorswheretheneedisgreatestandenablesotherpartsofthesystemtobecomemoreeffective.Thisshouldleadtobetteroutcomesfortheaffectedpopulation.Howexactlyitdoesthat,atwhatcostandwhatwouldhappenwithoutDFID’ssupporthoweverisoftennotclear.Costandbenefitsarerarelyquantified.

DFIDismakingeffortsonvariousfrontstorectifythis.Internally,DFIDPakistan,forexample,hasstartedpilotinganapproachtobetteroutcomeassessmentandunitcostanalysis.DFIDKenyaandSomaliaarebuildingupadatabaseofhumanitarianindicatorsandcosts.Externally,DFIDhassetuptheIndependentCommissionforAidImpact,abodythatwillevaluateDFID’swork,includingindisasterresponse,withafocusinimpact.Thereviewwelcomesthisinitiative.

Outputs and efficiencyOutputsarethefirstresultsinthechain.Anyprojectorprogrammehastobeabletoshowwhattheintendedoutputsareandlaterwhattherealoutputswere.Therearehowever,twoproblemswithreportingoutputresults.First,outputscanonlybeproxiesforimpactandcangetitwrong.Second,outputs,ascurrentlyreportedinprojectdocuments,cannoteasilybecomparedoraggregated.HenceitisdifficulttojudgetheefficiencyofimplementingpartnersandDFID’sfunding.

ThefollowingareexamplesofoutputsfromthePakistanfloodsresponse:

• Wheatandvegetableseeds,fertiliser,animalstockfeed,andveterinaryservicestomorethan115,000ruralfamiliestoavoidfurtherlossofanimalsanddependencyonfoodaidforthenextyearormore.

• Toiletsandsanitationforalmost500,000people.

Thenumberssoundimpressive,buttheydonotsayiftheseedsandfertiliserscameintimefortheplantingseason.Ifthetimingwaswrong,theimpactwouldnothavebeenthedesiredoneofrecovery.Theyalsodonotshowifthetoiletswereplacedandlitinsuchawayastobegendersensitive.Qualityandspeed–twokeyparametersofhumanitarianeffectiveness–cannotbeassessedbyoutputmeasurement.Thereisadangerbyfocusingononeareaoftheresultschainofhittingthetargetbutmissingthepoint.

Comparisonsbetweencostsofoutputsandhencethecostefficiencyofimplementingpartners,arecurrentlyclosetoimpossible.

• Outputsarenotstandardised(evenwithinsectors)withtheresultthatcomparingisoftenlikeappleswithpears.

• Somebenefitsaredifficulttomeasure,e.g.inprotectionanddifferentinterventionshavedifferentbenefits–theydonotalladdressthesameneed,e.g.cash-for-workversuspsychosocialsupport.

36 IFRCannualreport2008,p14;HowardKunreuther,November2010;otherstudiesestimateevenhighercostbenefitratios.

54


• Theinformationcurrentlyreceivedfromimplementingpartnerscangivearoughindicationofwhatthingscost.Itcannotgivemuchmorethough.

• Anycomparisonsofcostswouldbemisleadingwithoutknowingtheexactcircumstancesoftheactions,includingtargetingofdifferentpopulationgroups,levelofsecurityrisk,ortiming.

Onlywhenoutputsarethesame,isitpossibletocarryoutananalysistoseewhichinterventionisthemostcost-efficient.

Inputs and economyInputsareeasytoidentifyandquantify.Allbudgetsofimplementingpartnersshowwhatinputsareusedatwhatcost.Inputsrangefrommaterialsandlogistics,personnelandpersonnelsupport(includingsecurityforpersonnel)toindirectsupportcosts(theoverheads).

Comparingunitcostsofinputsbetweenimplementingpartnersoracrossemergenciesisrelativelyeasy.Butthecomparisonsdonotmakesenseifthecontextisnottakenintoaccountasexplainedintheoutputsection.Aprojectinacomplexemergencywithsecurityimplicationswillhavegreatersecuritycoststopersonnelattachedthananotheroneinanaturaldisasterzone.Aprojecttargetingdifficulttoreachpopulationswillhaveveryjustifiablygreaterlogisticscoststhanaprojectinanurbaneasy-to-reachenvironment.

LookingthroughbudgetsofDFIDimplementingpartners,itisobviousthatcostscandiffersignificantly,notalwaysforjustifiablereasons.AnagencyinthePakistanfloodresponseforexamplewantedtochargeDFID£1millionmoreforthesamenon-fooditemsdeliveredtothesameplacebutwithaonemonthtimedelaythanifDFIDhadprocuredtheitemsitself.Withthis£1million,shelterforanadditional10,000familiescouldhavebeenpurchasedanddeliveredamonthearlier.

The global supply chainAslogisticscanaccountforasmuchas80%37oftheeffortofhumanitarianorganisationsduringareliefoperation,theglobalsupplychainwarrantsspecialconsideration.

IfDFIDwantstoimproveitsabilitytorespondattherighttimefortherightpriceandwiththeappropriatequality,supplychainmanagementneedstoberecognisedasanintegralpartofpreparednessandresponse.

End-to-endsupplychainmanagementinahumanitarianresponseincludesprocurement,stockpilemanagement,qualityandcostcontrol,managingproductioncapacity,internationalmovement,coordinationwithotheragenciesanddeliverytothebeneficiaries.

ManyINGOshavelosttheirsupplychainmanagementcapabilitiesthroughthechangeintheirfocusfromdirectdeliverytoadvocacyoverthelastdecade.Thiscapabilitylossonthedevelopmentsideofoperationshastranslateddirectlyintoalossonthehumanitarianresponseside.EvaluationsofNGOresponseshaveshownthatmistakesareroutinelymadealongthesupplychain.

UNagenciesontheotherhandhavesignificantprocurementandlogisticsdepartmentsbuttheyareconstrainedbyantiquatedprocurementrules,differentdonorrequirementsandUNbureaucracy.

Keyconcernsthatimpactnegativelyontheaffectedpopulationare:

37 Trunick(2005).

55


• Qualityofnon-fooditemsbeingsubstandard.Itisestimatedthat70%ofthemillionplussheetsprovidedtoHaitiaftertheearthquakeneededreplacingafter9months.Atacost(withoutfreight)ofaround£10asheetthatmeans£7millionwasspentoncommodities,whichhaveatbestlasted9months.

• Reliefitemsarenotalwayswhatthebeneficiariesmostneedorarrivetoolate.AfterCycloneNargisinBurma,womengotintodebtbecausetheypurchasedreliefitemslongbeforetheinternationalresponsereachedthem.BlanketsprovidedintheaftermathoftheSamanganearthquakeinAfghanistanweretoothinfortheclimate.

• Lackofpreparednesscanleadtomultiplesoftransportcostsnecessary(especiallyairversusseatransport).

• Becauseoflimitedsupplysidecapacityinanemergency,pricesgoupandqualitydecreases.Thiscanbeovercomebybuildingupthesupplierbaseinadvanceandcollaboratingonqualitystandardsandspecifications,

Whilstdecreasingtheseinefficienciesshouldbeseenasaprioritynow,DFIDhastorecognisethattheglobalsupplychainislikelytochangesoonerorlater.Ifforexamplecashresponsesbecomeagame-changerinhumanitarianresponse,thiswillhaveimportantimplications.Internationalprocurementandtransportwilldecrease.Afocusonmorelocalprocurement,asincreasinglydonebyWFP,willalsochangethenatureofthetraditionalsupplychain.

Recommendations

DFID should:

36 Build up a library of results, costs of inputs, outputs and outcomes from different countries and regions and different types of disasters in order to be able to carry out effective unit cost analysis and enable fast evidence based decision-making. Share this where appropriate with other donors.

37 EncouragetheIndependentCommissionforAidImpacttoexaminearangeofhumanitariancasesandresiliencebuildingwork.

38 Carryoutanin-depthstudyonhowDFID’sfundingimpactsonthehumanitariansupplychainrecognisingthatthesupplychainisamajorcostdriverinsudden-onsetresponses.Basedonthefindings,workwithotherdonors,theprivatesectorandimplementingpartnerstoalignsupplychainpractices.

5.5 Getting the message across

ThereisstrongpublicsupportfortheUKresponsetodisastersandemergenciesindevelopingcountries38.ButhistoricallyDFIDhasnotusedtheseopportunitiestotalkaboutitswork.WithanaidbudgetunderattackfromsomequartersandquestionsaboutfailureinHaiti,DFIDneedstogetbetteratcommunicatingthegenerallyexcellentworkitdoes.

Thecommunicationsenvironmentischanging.CommunitiesintheUKareoftenindependentlylinkedtoaffectedpopulations,throughdiasporas,faithbasedgroupsandpartnerships.Itisnolongerpossible,ordesirabletoadoptabroadcastapproachtocommunicationswork.Domesticmediacoverageisincreasinglyhostiletothe

38 93%ofrespondentsstronglyagreedoragreedwiththestatement‘WhereverpossibletheUKgovernmentshouldresponddirectlytodisastersandemergenciesindevelopingcountries’.HERRon-linepublicsurvey:Feb2011.

56


government’sringfencedaidbudget,andtherearegreaterexpectationsaroundthespeedandavailabilityofaccurateinformationaboutDFID’swork.

HumanitariandisastersnaturallyattracthighlevelsofmediaattentionintheUK,andthepublicarereadytobeengaged.TherelationshipbetweenthemediaandNGOsisacomplexone.ThemediaoftenreliesonNGOsforaccessandinformationatthesametimeasseeingitsroletoholdthemtoaccount.IfanNGOhelpsajournalistreachacommunitythatisreceivingsupportduringaresponse,thejournalistislikelytogofurthertofindacommunitythathasbeenoverlookedtopresentthestoryofaidnotgettingtothosewhoneedit39.

UsingitsrelativeindependencefromthisrelationshipDFIDcanmakegeneralcommentsonthecontextandnatureofthedisasterandtheplannedresponse.Itisabletoreferneutrallytotheworkofothers,tosecureauniquepositionincommunicatingtotheUKpublic.Butthispositioncanonlybeexploitedifitcanofferanauthoritativevoiceonthegroundfromtheoutsetofaresponse.

Thereisalsoaneedtoemployalongertermstrategicapproachtohelpshareabetterunderstandingabouthowanemergencyresponseworks–andwhyitisimportant.

ThisneedsastrongandconsistentnarrativetoenablethepublictounderstandthatdifferentdisastersandemergenciesneedadifferentresponsefromtheUK–includingexplanationofhumanitarianpolicy,howtheinternationalcommunityisrespondingandtherangeofresponsestomeetneeds.Intimethiswillhelpchallengetheperceptionthataid,developmentandhumanitarianresponseisoneandthesame.

TheUKAidTransparencyGuaranteewillputallnewspendingon-line.Thiswillmakedetailedinformationofeachemergencyresponseavailable.Aproactiveandstrategicapproachtopubliccommunicationswork(mediaandnon-media)willbeneededtoputthisinformationincontext.

Foranemergencyresponse,strategy,plansandexpectedresultsneedtobereadilyavailable.EarlystatementsonUK’splansandobjectivestoresponseshouldbepostedon-lineassoonaspossible.Thesecanbedevelopedastheresponseprogressesandshouldcomplementmediaannouncementsonfundingallocations.

ButwhereconcernsabouteffectivenessandcorruptionaregenerallyhighthereviewpublicsurveyshowedsupportforDFID’sresponsedidn’tcarrythesamelevelsofconcernaboutwasteandcorruptionthathavebeenreflectedinothersurveys40.ItalsoshowedthatthepublicfeelpleasedwhentheyhearabouttheUKgovernment’sresponse41alongwithadesiretoknowmore42.AndmorerecentresearchcommissionedbyPlanUKreportedthat90%ofrespondentsrecalledrecentdisastersinHaitiorPakistan,and36%werepromptedtodonate43.ThispresentsDFIDwithaclearopportunitytobringitsworktotheattentionofanalreadyengagedpublic–oneofitsbestchancestoreachabroadUKpublicisthroughcommunicationsarounditsresponsetorapidonsetdisasters.

39 PlanUK:Unnaturaldisasters:compassionversuscomplexityinthemedia’sreportingofhumanitarianemergencies.MediaSymposium:Feb2011.

40 60%ofrespondentsdisagreedorstronglydisagreedwiththestatement‘Emergencyaidiswastedthroughinefficiencyandcorruption,andthemoneyandsupportdoesn’tgettothepeolewhoreallyneedit’.HERRon-linepublicsurvey:Feb2011.

41 98%ofrespondentsstronglyagreedoragreedwiththestatement‘IfeelpleasedwhenIhearthattheUKgovernmentishelpingplayapartinaninternationalresponsetoadisasterofemergency’.HERRon-linepublicsurvey:Feb2011.

42 94%ofrespondentsstronglyagreedoragreedwiththestatement‘TheUKgovernmentshoulddomoretoexplaintothepublichowitsworkishelpingtomeettheneedsofpeopleaffectedbyinternationaldisastersandemergencies’.HERRon-linepublicsurvey:Feb2011

43 PlanUK:Unnaturaldisasters:compassionversuscomplexityinthemedia’sreportingofhumanitarianemergencies.ComRes:Feb2011.

57


Governmentrestrictionsonspendingmeansthatalongsidetraditionalbroadcastandprintmediaactivity,communicationsthroughDFID’sownwebsiteandonlinepresenceisvitaltothesuccessofitscommunicationstrategy.Thisworkhasbeendevelopingwell:e-bulletins,blogs,tweets,YouTube,FacebookandFlickrpagespresentDFID’sworktoanengagedpublic.CommunicationsactivityaroundtheUK’sresponsetomeethumanitarianneedsinGazafollowingOperationCastLead,andtheon-lineFloodMonitorshowingclearlywhereandhowUKAidishelpingpeopleaffectedbythefloodsinPakistan44,hasshownDFID’scommunicationsworkaroundanemergencyresponseatitsbest.

Thoseaffectedbydisasterareincreasinglyabletoprovideinformationandcontributetoassessmentofneedaswellascallingdonorsandtheinternationalcommunitydirectlytoaccountviaonlinechannelsmeansevengreaterneedforcontinuedbuildingofitsonlineprocess.

Recommendations

DFID should:

39 Prioritise communications as a key factor in the UK’s emergency response, and resource it accordingly.

• Embedcommunicationsatthepolicyandoperationslevelfromthebeginningofaresponse.

• MakeDFID’shumanitarianandemergencyresponseworkpermanentlymorevisiblethroughDFID’swebsite–inadditiontofeaturesonspecificresponses.Communicationsstaff,and/ortheteamleadertrainedincommunicationsshouldbesupportedtospeakpubliclyonDFID’sbehalf.

• Makebetteruseoffaithbasedanddiasporapartners.

• Workmorecloselywithfundedpartnersoncommunications–toagreeaconsistentnarrativeandsharechannels.Theserelationshipsneedtobedevelopedinadvanceofanemergencyresponse.

40 Request the International Development Select Committee to scrutinise progress on the implementation of these findings one year on from the launch of this report.

44 www.dfid.gov.uk/Where-we-work/Asia-South/Pakistan/Pakistan-Floods-Monitor/

58


6. RecommendationsAnticipation

1 Assemble and regularly update a global risk register for DFID using information gained from its country teams and international organisations.

2 MakebetteruseoftheDFIDChiefScientisttosupportUKscienceinanticipatingcrises.

3 Makethisavailableasacontributiontopre-crisisarrangementsacrossthesystem.

Resilience

4 Ensure that building resilience is part of the core DFID programme in at risk countries, integrating the threat from climate change and other potential hazards into disaster risk reduction. Country offices should undertake contingency planning.

5 Promote national response capacities of both governments and civil society in at risk countries including:

•Thedevelopmentofnationalresiliencestrategies.

•Theestablishmentofdirectfundingmechanisms.

•Regionalresponsemechanismswheretheyaddvalue.

•ThroughcivilsocietyorganisationssuchasRedCrossandCrescentSocieties.

•Nationalandlocalprivatesectorcompanies,whichareableatthecountryleveltosupportentrepreneurial,andmarketsolutions,whichwillincreaseinresilienceandimprovedisasterresponse.

Leadership

6 Build coalitions to drive forward humanitarian reform based on improving leadership, including;

•Rapiddeploymentofexperiencedleadershipteamsinbigcrises.Thisshouldincludea‘stepaside’systemtoensurethebestleadershipisinplaceatboththestrategicandoperationallevel.

• EncouragetheconveningofaUNHighLevelPaneltolookatwaysofimprovingtheinternationalhumanitariansystemtofacefuturechallenges.

•WorkcloselywithUKmissionstobuildcoalitionsforreformoftheinternationalsystem,includingmorecoherentuseofUNexecutiveboardpositions.

•WorkwiththeUNtocreateanewcadreofhumanitarianleadersandthetalentmanagementsystemsandtermsandconditionstosustainthis.

•WorkwithotherdonorsandtheUNtoresolvesomeofthedeficienciesinmanagement,prioritisationandplanning.Thismustincludetherightsupportstaffavailableforrapiddeployment.

•WorkwithotherdonorsandtheUNtostrengthenandprovidebetterleadershipoftheclustersystem.

7 DFIDshouldmakeasustainedefforttoimproveskillsinthehumanitariansector.Thisshouldinclude;

•Worktocreateasetofstandardsforhumanitarianleadership.

•TrainingwithinDFID,aidagenciesandgovernmentsandcivilsocietyindisasterpronecountries.

• Ensuringpre-qualifiedpartnersdemonstrateadequateinvestmentinskillsdevelopment

59

Recommendations

Innovation

8 Nurture innovation and its application in dealing with and preparing for humanitarian emergencies, including through partnership with operational agencies, private sector, technological innovators and science and research communities.

9 Appoint a Humanitarian Senior Research Fellow, reporting to the Chief Scientific Officer with a dedicated budget tasked with developing evidence and innovation.

10 Investinthreekeytechnologies;mobiletechnologies,satellitesanddatamanagementanddisplay.

11 Supportexplorationofemergingandcutting-edgetechnologiessuchasnanotechnology,andnewcomputermodellingapproaches.

12 Workwithpartnerstoensurecashbasedresponsesaregivenfullconsiderationandwhereappropriatebecomemuchmorewidelyadopted.

Accountability

13 Promote and support mechanisms to give recipients of aid a greater voice.

14 Promote the development of robust impact assessments.

15 Workwithotherstocreateanover-archingsetofstandardstoassessbeneficiaryaccountability.

16 Encouragethespreadofbestpracticeinthisarea.

17 Givegreateremphasistobeneficiaryaccountabilityfactorswhenmakingfundingdecisions.

Partnership

18 Reach out to create new partnerships with new donor partners (in particular China, India, Brazil and the Gulf States).

19 Maintain its default position that humanitarian response is multilateral. In particular it should:

• EngagemoreeffectivelywithECHOonapolicylevel,andexplorethepossibilityofco-financing.

•WorkwithotherstosupporttheUNEmergencyReliefCoordinatorinthereformofOCHAandthesystemmorewidely.

20 WorkwithpartnerstopromotedonorcoordinationandrevitalisetheGoodHumanitarianDonor-shipgroup.

21 EnsurethatthenewPrivateSectorDepartmentgivesfullconsiderationtothoseareaswhereprivatesectorexpertisecanimprovehumanitarianresponseeffectiveness,includingatthecountrylevel.

22 UsemilitaryassetsinsituationswheretheyareconsistentwithOsloguidelinesandoffercapacityotherscannot,orprovidebettervalueformoneythancommercialalternatives.

23 WorkwithNGOstopromotetheconceptofaccreditationorcertification.

60


Humanitarian space

24 Re-assert the premise that humanitarian action should be based on need, reaffirming the key principles of humanity, neutrality and impartiality in the new DFID humanitarian policy.

25 Ensurefundingismadeavailableforsecurityandriskmanagementforhumanitarianworkers.

Changing the policy

26 Incorporate resilience into its development policy and programmes.

27 Develop a new humanitarian policy setting out why the UK responds, where, when and how.Thepolicyshouldbuildonthereviewthemesofanticipation,resilience,leadership,innovation,accountability,partnershipandhumanitarianspace.

Delivering differently

28 Change the funding model to achieve greater preparedness, pre-crisis arrangements, capacity, performance and coherence by:

• Increasingpredictablemulti-yearfundinglinkedtoperformancetomajorUNagencies,theRedCrossMovementandNGOs.

• Increasinglong-termsupporttointernational(theCERF)andcountrylevelpooledfundsandtoglobal,regionalandcountrylevelNGOconsortia,suchastheCBHAandWAHRF.

29 Design fast and flexible funding models for emergency responses:

•ProvidefastmobilisationfundingintheCriticalPeriodbasedonpre-qualificationratherthanspeculativeproposals.UsetheprocesstoreducebureaucracyinthisCriticalPeriod.

• EnsurerecoveryandlivelihoodsfundingisconsideredduringandimmediatelyaftertheCriticalPeriod,ratherthanlaterashastraditionallybeenthecase.

• Ensurethereisflexibilityoffundingasfastmovingsituationschange,perhapsbyprovidingitinstages.

30 Useallnewfundingmodelstoenforcestandardsandlinkfundingtoperformancethroughclearimpactassessmentsandreporting.Carryoutindependentperiodicprogrammeauditsandafteractionreviewstoinformfuturefundingdecisions.

31 Develop and deploy niche capabilities in a more focused way concentrating on those areas where DFID or the UK are able to add value:

•OnlyusesearchandrescueinsituationswheretheUKcangenuinelyaddvalue.

• Incorporatesurgicalteamsintofirstphasedeploymentsespeciallyafterearthquakes.

• Investigatenewformsofnichecapabilitiesthatcanrespondtonewtypesofthreatssuchasnuclear,biologicalandchemical.

32 ContinueandexpandthesurgeofUKcontractedpersonnelintotheinternationalsystem.

33 Conveneandleadastandingcross-governmentemergencymechanismformegaemergencies,usingtheauthorityoftheNationalSecurityCouncil.

61

Recommendations

Changing the structure, shifting resources

34 Ensure that the structure, funding and human resources for humanitarian work reflects its importance as a central part of DFID work, not least by having a Director General champion this work. Amongst others, this will require

•RebalanceresourceswithinDFIDtomeetthechallengesofrisinghumanitarianneed.

• Expandthehumanitariancadre,bothinLondonandinthefield.

• Ensuringeveryresponsetorapidonsethumanitarianneedisledbyanexperiencedresponsemanager,withsufficientdelegatedauthoritytoensureswiftaction.

• Leadlarge-scaleresponsesfromLondon,managedbyCHASE.

35 Redefinetheobjectivesforthecontractedresponseteamsothatitissolelydedicatedtosupportingrapidresponseandpre-crisisarrangements.

Driving results and value for money

36 Build up a library of results, costs of inputs, outputs and outcomes from different countries and regions and different types of disasters in order to be able to carry out effective unit cost analysis and enable fast evidence based decision-making. Share this where appropriate with other donors.

37 EncouragetheIndependentCommissionforAidImpacttoexaminearangeofhumanitariancasesandresiliencebuildingwork.

38 Carryoutanin-depthstudyonhowDFID’sfundingimpactsonthehumanitariansupplychainrecognisingthatthesupplychainisamajorcostdriverinsudden-onsetresponses.Workwithotherdonors,theprivatesectorandimplementingpartnerstoalignsupplychainpractices.

Getting the message out

39 Prioritise communications as a key factor in the UK’s emergency response, and resource it accordingly.

• Embedcommunicationsatthepolicyandoperationslevelfromthebeginningofaresponse.

•MakeDFID’shumanitarianandemergencyresponseworkpermanentlymorevisiblethroughDFID’swebsite–inadditiontofeaturesonspecificresponses.Communicationsstaff,and/ortheteamleadertrainedincommunicationsshouldbesupportedtospeakpubliclyonDFID’sbehalf.

•Makebetteruseoffaithbasedanddiasporapartners.

•Workmorecloselywithfundedpartnersoncommunications–toagreeaconsistentnarrativeandsharechannels.Theserelationshipsneedtobedevelopedinadvanceofanemergencyresponse.

40 Request the International Development Select Committee to scrutinise progress on the implementation of these findings one year on from the launch of this report.

PublishedbytheHumanitarianEmergencyResponseReview

March2011

Chair:Lord(Paddy)Ashdown

Director:RossMountain

SeniorAdvisoryBoardMembers:AndyBearpark;BarneyMayhew;CarolynMiller;DavidBryer;ElisabethRasmusson;GilbertGreenall;GordonConway;JodaSilva;MarkBowden;NiciDahrendorf;RandolphKent;SimonMaxwell;SteffenStenberg;SueWardell;YaseminAysan.

HumanitarianReviewTeamSecretariat:MelindaSimmons;LewisSida;RachelKessler;SophiePongracz;LouisaBrewin;DavidPratt;MalcolmRidout;RosTendler.

Thisreportisavailableonline:www.dfid.gov.uk/emergency-response-review

Documents

Humanitarian Emergency Response Review · clingingtotheroofofafloodedhome,wedon’tsomuchcommittohelp,asfeel ... not only a more compassionate world, but ... Investinginresiliencewillsavelivesandmoneyinthefuture