Upload
atalanta-vasiliou
View
20
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Human Rights Protection Against Discrimination on the Basis of AGE. Department of Human Affairs Ministry of Youth, Families & Sports. Public Consultation November, 2012. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Department of Human Affairs Ministry of Youth, Families & Sports
Public ConsultationNovember, 2012
Human Rights Protection Against Discrimination on the Basis of AGE
“Discrimination due to age is one of the greatest tragedies of modern life . The desire to work and be useful is what makes life worth living, and to
be told your efforts are not needed because you are the wrong age is a crime.” Johnny Ball
Agenda Overview of the Issue Review of Previous Efforts Statistics Jurisdictional Review Potential Benefits of Age Legislation Feedback from Public Consultation What are the implications ? Q & A
Public Consultations held to-date • Bermuda Chamber Of
Commerce • Ace Insurance• Argus• BF & M• BIU• Prisons• Police• KEMH• Freisenbruch-Meyer Group• HSBC• Public Consultation• Age Concern• Bermuda College
• Pension Commission• National Office for Seniors• Social Insurance• Labour and Training• Bermuda Fire Service• BELCO• Bermuda Human Resources
Association• Bermuda College Senior• Patterson-Partners• Labour Force Survey• BPSU
Key Terms Discrimination: refers to the act of treating
someone less favorably than others, or to deliberately treat a person differently than others on the basis of, for example, their racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, or age, to name a few.
Ageism: refers to two concepts: a socially constructed way of thinking about older persons based on negative attitudes and stereotypes about ageing and a tendency to structure society based on an assumption that everyone is young, thereby failing to respond appropriately to the real needs of older persons.
Timeline
Landmark Case on AGE DiscriminationDr. McPhee
Human Rights Act 1981
Amendment to the Public
Service Superannuation Act Section 22 (2) Increased
work age to 70
2011
THRONE SPEECH
2012
1981 1996 2001
The AGE of Majority Act 2001– lowered the official age of majority from 21 to 18
2004
2007 2008
Review of The Human Rights Act, The HuckerReport 2008
Recommendation # 20Add AGE to the ACT
2009
More Research required
The Union advocates for AGE to
be added to the ACT
2002
The Human Rights
Commission discusses
adding AGE to the ACT
Our Ageing Population
64,237 Total Population 19,348 (30%) Population Aged 45-64 8,683 (14%) Population Aged 65 &
over 41 Median Age
Source: Census 2010
Jurisdictional Review: International Standards Protecting Against AGE
Discrimination U.S.A Canada United
KingdomCaribbean New
ZealandAustralia Bermuda
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) Protects certain applicants and employees 40 years of age and older from discrimination on the basic of age in hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation. ……….
Canada’s provinces, territories & federal government all have slightly different human rights laws however they all protect against age discrimination.
The Equality Act 2010 included age as a protected characteristic. The law provides protection against age discrimination in employment, training and adult education, for people of all ages. Recently the legislation has been amended to include goods & services.
Many Caribbean Islands have Constitutional protections against limited grounds of discrimination such as race and religion, but have no human rights legislation protecting against discrimination.
The Human Rights Act 1993 aims to promote and protect human rights including age accordance with a number of United Nations Covenants or Conventions on Human Rights that the New Zealand Government has signed.
Australia’s most recent federal discrimination law, the Age Discrimination Act 2004, aims to ensure that all Australians – young and old – and everyone in between are treated equally and have the same opportunities as others.
The Human Rights Act 1981Does not protect on the grounds of AGE
Mandatory RetirementNO MANDATORY RETIREMENT MANDATORY RETIREMENT
USA - OUTLAWED 1986 Japan- Increased from 55 to 60 in 1994, increasing to 65 in 2012
Canada - ABOLISHED -between 1973 & 2009
France- Private sector from 60-65 in 2003
New Zealand- PHASED OUT -between 1993 & 1999
Sweden- After the age of 67 in 2001
Australia- ABOLISHED 2004 Italy- Will increase to 66 by 2018
UK- REMOVED in 2011
Possible Considerations for Age Legislation
Employees Employers
Possible flexible working conditions Disproportionately high insurance benefits
Possible adoption of a “phased” or gradual retirement
Disability Insurance
Possible training schemes for older workers Life Insurance
Possibly encourage employees to work later in life with incentives:
More savingsIncreased pension amount for later retirementCreative benefits and compensation methods
Pension Cost
Health Insurance
Comments from the Stakeholder Consultations INSURANCE
COMPANIESBUSINESSES
INSURANCE Discrimination in Underwriting. Talked about the implications of discrimination in underwriting and the statements of fact. Has nothing to do with gender, has to do with age and is actuarial & quantitatively based.
Comments about age limits with regard to health insurance and life insurance. Need to look at both spectrums – old and young.
EMPLOYMENT There has been no test, but if someone over 65 wanted to work; as long as they could do the job, they care less about age as long as you are producing. We live in a performance based society no mater the age. Implement physical/mental based test
65 is the default retirement age and there is a retirement policy in place. However, management can make a case for an individual to work beyond 65 years young as well as terminating employment. Consideration will be based on a business need one year at a time. Must be objectively justified
PENSION What happens if the DRA is removed ? What are the consequences of insured benefits and employee share plans? A phased out approach seems practical. Rethink the transition
If age discrimination and mandatory retirement are put into an Equality Act and benefits have to be provided to 70 year olds, this could be a major cost to the employer. Establishment of a formal code of practice.
Suggestions from the Public Consultation held in September 2012 • There should be no mandated retirement age. • There should be an option for phased retirement
starting at 65 and finishing at 70.• People have not been hired due to their age.• People are being made redundant; the economy is
being used as an excuse• Culture of ageism must be removed• People should be able to work as long as they are
capable.• People told too young and also too old for jobs: not
hired.• Government should reconsider the process
pertaining to keeping employees beyond 65 years.
Tell Us What YOU Think
• Are you in favour of adding Age as a ground of Discrimination to a Human Rights/Equalities Framework?
• How would this affect your organization?• What are your policies regarding retirement i.e.
any default retirement age or incentives?• Have you had any employee/s request to work
beyond 65?• Have you hired any persons over 55?• Do you think there should be a mandatory
retirement age for all persons in Bermuda?