21
Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel: Do we need to be more explicit? Werner Kiene Chairman of the Inspection Panel April 23, 2009

Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

  • Upload
    jerom

  • View
    41

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:. Do we need to be more explicit?. Werner Kiene Chairman of the Inspection Panel April 23, 2009. The Panel and Human Rights . Creating an Inspection Panel “Resolution” governing the Panel Experience in Inspections - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:Do we need to be more explicit?

Werner KieneChairman of the Inspection Panel

April 23, 2009

Page 2: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

The Panel and Human Rights

• Creating an Inspection Panel

• “Resolution” governing the Panel

• Experience in Inspections

• Can we do better? Should we do more

Page 3: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Creating an Inspection Panel

• Critique on the “business” of the Bank and other international bodies

• Rio• Transparency and the right to know• The right to co-determine• New international law doctrine: Citizens

and Communities have recourse not only member states

Page 4: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

The Panel is an independent body that responds to complaints (Requests for Inspection) by people who believe that they are suffering, or may suffer, harm caused by a World Bank-financed project.

The “Resolution”: the way the Panel works

Page 5: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Key HumanRights Aspects enshrined in the Panel Process• Participation, Accountability,

Recourse• Protecting the Right to Seek

Recourse• Human rights and application of

Bank Policies

Page 6: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Requests for Inspection come directly from affected people Enables people to seek recourse for decisions that affect them,

pierce the “shroud” of large institutions Based on recognition that actions of large institutions like the World

Bank can have negative (even if unintended) as well as positive impacts on people

People have expertise, know their needs

Panel reflects new emphasis on accountability from “below”

Participation, Accountability, Recourse

Page 7: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Panel’s greatest attribute - - connection to affected people, and giving people voice at highest decision-making level of Bank

Supports basic principle and right that people should have a say in actions that affect them, and be able freely to register complaint and seek redress for harm

Giving People a Voice

Page 8: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Meeting affected people - Cambodia

Page 9: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Protecting the Right to Seek Recourse

Submitting a Request can put people at risk of reprisal

If seen as threat to important project, or to person in power . . .

Have been examples where people pressured against submitting a complaint, jailed after filing, in one case tortured

Page 10: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Protections Provisions to protect confidentiality Can file through a “representative” Request by an Executive Director of the

World Bank

Page 11: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Protections – Cont’d Panel reports instances of reprisal to highest

authorities

Several examples in Panel Reports, Board Statements (Chad-Cameroon, others)

Avoid “chilling” effect on right to recourse; protection of basic human rights

Page 12: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Panel Statement to Board, Mumbai Urban Transport Project, June 2006

“The Panel wishes to emphasize that it respects the sovereignty of a country to deal with its citizens. However, the Panel also notes that imprisonment of the chief spokesperson of the Requesters, without bail, sends a chilling message to peoples everywhere who would complain to the Panel about Bank projects. It affects the Bank’s credibility and ability to work effectively in response to the Panel’s findings and in pursuit of its own actionn plan.”

Page 13: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Panel analyzes Bank compliance with safeguard and other policies - - not apply other legal norms

BUT - - safeguard policies contain requirements that promote and support basic human rights, and Panel findings contribute to their further development and application

Panel work addresses both substantive (e.g., right to water) and procedural rights (right to information)

Some policies mention human rights (e.g. Indigenous Peoples)

Human rights and Bank policies

Page 14: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Panel Statement to Board: Chad-Cameroon Oil Pipeline,September 2002

““Given the world-wide attention to the human rights situation in Chad . . .and the fact that this was an issue raised in the Request for Inspection by a Requester who alleged that there were human rights violations in the country, and that he was tortured because of his opposition to the conduct of the project, the Panel was obliged to examine the situation of human rights and governance in the light of Bank policies. We are convinced that the approach taken in our report, which finds human rights implicitly embedded in various policies of the Bank, is within the boundaries of the Panel’s approach to this sensitive subject and has pledged to continue to monitor the developments in this area within the context of the applicable Bank policies.”

Page 15: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Statement of a Previous General Counsels of the Bank

“Human rights are at the very core of the World Bank’s mandate.”

“The Articles of Agreement permit, and in some cases require, the Bank to recognize the human rights dimensions of its development policies and activities, since it is now evident that human rights are an intrinsic part of the Bank’s mission.”

“The Bank’s role is to support its Members to fulfill [their actionable human rights obligations] where they relate to Bank projects and policies”

Page 16: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Recent Examples – Panel Cases and Basic Human Rights

Rights of indigenous peoples, land tenure (e.g., DRC Congo, Honduras, Cambodia)

Livelihood restoration, restitution in cases of forced displacement (e.g., Mumbai, West Africa Gas Pipeline)

Rights of participation and meaningful consultation (e.g., DRC Congo, Pakistan, Cambodia).

Rights to security of person, access to water and livelihoods (e.g., Pakistan). UN Human Rights body referred to Panel findings as addressing fundamental right of people to access to water

Page 17: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

.

Demolition February 2006

Page 18: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

.

Demolition February 2006

Page 19: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Bank Policies and International Agreements Recent investigation in Honduras examined relationship between

Bank policies and international agreement(s) on human rights: Requesters (Garifuna indigenous peoples) complained that

Bank project was contributing to violation of human rights protected by ILO Convention 169 on indigenous peoples

Panel found that Bank policy requires that Bank not finance actions that would lead a country to contravene its obligations under this international agreement

Panel noted concern about a Legal Opinion limiting application of the policy to “environmental” agreements and not others such as ILO 169

Other speakers today will remark on this new finding by the Panel

Page 20: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

Can we do more?Should we do more?

• A. ?• B. ?• C.?• .• .• .

Page 21: Human Rights Dimensions Of The Inspection Panel:

www.inspectionpanel.org

[email protected]