2
H Corder Page 1 01/07/2010 Enclosure KPCT/10/124 NHS KIRKLEES Report To: NHS Kirklees Trust Board Agenda Item 10 Title: Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust – Hospital Development Plan Service Configuration FOI Exemption Category Open Mike Potts Lead Director: Chief Executive Author: Mike Potts, Chief Executive Key Points to Note: tive service change nt of the Orthopaedic e in Pinderfields and seeks support for these ce Process, the that these come of our further engagement with Overview and Scrutiny across The report updates the Board on the alterna proposals that will secure the developme Trauma Servic changes. In addition, it provides further information on the progress of the SHA Service Change Assuran process for securing external clinical assurance proposals are appropriate and safe and the out Wakefield and Kirklees. Budget Implications: Proposed service changes funded within the tariffs agreed as part of the contract with MYHT. elate to the provision of transport yet Potential additional costs r to be agreed. Risk Assessment: High – if changes are not agreed before the new hospitals open in January 2011. Legal Implications: None Health Benefits: Improved health outcomes for patients Staffing Implications: Mid Yorkshire handling as part of the new hospitals commissioning programme. Equality Impact: Work is underway with the SHA to provide assurance that we have met all the required tests, as detailed in the paper. Sub Group/Committee: Wakefield and Kirklees Partnership Board

Document

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

http://www.kirklees.nhs.uk/fileadmin/documents/meetings/30062010/KPCT-10-124_Cover_Sheet_MYHT_-_Hospital_Development_Plan_Service_Configuration.pdf

Citation preview

Page 1: Document

H Corder Page 1 01/07/2010

Enclosure KPCT/10/124

NHS KIRKLEES

Report To: NHS Kirklees Trust Board

Agenda Item 10

Title: Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust – Hospital Development Plan Service Configuration

FOI Exemption Category Open

Mike Potts

Lead Director: Chief Executive

Author: Mike Potts, Chief Executive

Key Points to Note:

tive service change nt of the Orthopaedic

e in Pinderfields and seeks support for these

ce Process, the that these come of our

further engagement with Overview and Scrutiny across

The report updates the Board on the alternaproposals that will secure the developmeTrauma Servicchanges. In addition, it provides further information on the progress of the SHA Service Change Assuranprocess for securing external clinical assuranceproposals are appropriate and safe and the out

Wakefield and Kirklees.

Budget Implications: Proposed service changes funded within the tariffs agreed as part of the contract with MYHT.

elate to the provision of transport yet Potential additional costs rto be agreed.

Risk Assessment: High – if changes are not agreed before the new hospitals open in January 2011.

Legal Implications: None

Health Benefits: Improved health outcomes for patients

Staffing Implications: Mid Yorkshire handling as part of the new hospitals commissioning programme.

Equality Impact: Work is underway with the SHA to provide assurance that we have met all the required tests, as detailed in the paper.

Sub Group/Committee: Wakefield and Kirklees Partnership Board

Page 2: Document

H Corder Page 2 01/07/2010

Recommendation: ised service change linical

information required by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee and the SHA.

The Board is asked to AGREE the revproposals and NOTE the visit of the National CAssessment Team and the further/