HRC ORAFT MINUTES 09-14-06

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ

PLANNING DEPARTMENT 701 OCEAN STREET, qTH FLOOR, SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060

(831) 454-2580 FAX: (831) 454-2131 TDD: (831) 454-2123 TOM BURNS, PLANNING DIRECTOR

HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION DRAFTMINUTES

Thursday, SeDtember 14,2006 4:30 p.m. REGULAR MEETING Santa Cruz CA 95060

Board of Supervisor’s Chambers County Building, 5* Floor

1. CALL TO ORDEWROLL CALL Chair Manning called the meeting to order at 4:38 p.m. Commissioners Present: Commissioners Absent: Borg (excused) Staff Present: Guiney Members of the Public Present: Harrison, Norman Poitevin, Howard and Annette Watts, Calvin Spafford, Pat and Geri Davidson, Anthony Kirk, Charles Eadie, Michael Bethke, Baku1 Panchar, Dana Clarke, Elizabeth Schilling, Betsey Lynberg, Stephanie Barns-Castro, Roderick Johnson, Karen Rovai, Sally Blair, DeEtta Spurgeon, Forrest Balding, Anthony Silveira, Cathy Newkirk, Jeanne Soderman.

Fisher, Kennedy, and Manning.

Mark Dettle, Margret Hosier, Joel Harrison, Barbara

--------~ .-- 2. AGENDA APPROVAL OR MODIFICATION

Approved as presented.

A. Proposal to replace an existing 5 x 4 window with a 3 x 6 French door and erect a sign for a proposed bed and breakfast at 1258 San Andreas Road, La Selva Beach. Fisher moved approval of the consent item, Kennedy seconded; motion passed 3-0.

6. PUBLIC HEARING A. Public hearing to consider a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors regarding

designation of certain properties in Live Oak as historic resources.

Page 1 of 8

The Commission considered the recommendations of the County’s consultant, CIRCA, and the staff recommendation.

HRC DRAFT MINUTES 09-14-06

Address - . Historic Resources Commission t -Y, :. Recommendation APN

favor of designation as a historic resource. Commissioner Kennedy agreed that the house is unique and a good example of its architectural style that is fast disappearing and should be preserved. Commissioner Fisher explained the criteria for designation and agreed with Commissioner Kennedy. Commissioner Kennerfir moved to recommend designation as a historic resource at NR5. Commissioner Fisher seconded. The motion passed 34.

about the historic process generally. Jeanne Soderman addressed the Commission stating that she felt the designation process was outrageous, that she was concerned about takings, and federal government involvement in this. Commissioner Fisher moved to have the house remain as NR6. Commissioner Kennedv seconded. The motion passes

Page 2 of 8

HRC ORAFT MINUTES 09-14-06

oric designation with a rating of NR5, citing the house’s integrity ted her opposition to designation of properties as historic, stating

ey are penalized by being designated historic and private property rights are taken away. Commissioner Fisher stated that the house is a good example of its architectural style and was built by James Morrisey, an important person in the community, and moves to recommend designation as a historic resource at NRS. Commissioner Kennedy seconded. The motion passed 3-0.

as a historic resource. Betsev Lvnberg, Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Adnunistrator, agreed with the staff recommendation. RDA owns the property and it is slated for commercial development. Commissioner Fisher stated that the house should be designated as a historic resource because it is a good example of chicken ranch house. Commissioner Kennedy stated that the connection to a historic figure is obscure and irrelevant and that the house is not a great example of its style. Commissioner Fisher moved recommendation to designate at NR.5. There was no second. Commissioner Kennedy moved recommendation to not designate, but rate NR6. There was no second. Commissioner Kennedv moved to continue to October. Commissioner Fisher seconded. The motion to continue passed 3-0.

require approval by associated with the h

. Commissioner Fisher moved to send to the Board without a recommendation.

Staff made a brief presentation recommending that the house not be designated as a historic resource, but be given a rating of NR6. Patrick Davidson, owner, said the house is not inhabited and he can’t afford to upgrade it and that there is no good evidence that the house was built by Dr. Doane. Commissioner Kennedy moved to not recommend designation of the house as a historic resource, but to give it a rating of NR6. Commissioner Fisher seconded. The motion passed 3-0

1526 7th Avenue* 026-321-28 NR6 Staff made a brief presentation recommending that the house remain NR6 and not be recommended for designation as a historic resource. Mark Dettle, representing the owner, his grandmother, described family illnesses, disrepair of property, preference to remain NR6. Commissioner Kennedy felt there was not compelling reason to be designated as historic and moved to retain as NR6. Commissioner Fisher seconded. The motion passed 3-0.

Page 3 of 8

HRC DRAFT MINUTES 09-14-06

1575 7th Avenue 026-501-02 NR5 Staff made a brief presentation recommending that the house remain NR6 and not be recommended for designation as a historic resource. Stenhanie Barnes-Castro, architect, addressed the Commission regarding previous consultations with Development Review staff, before the owner knew the house was being considered for possible designation as a historic resource, about a possible minor land division on this site. Development Review staff advised the owner that it would not be feasible to incorporate the existing house into the land division as proposed. One alternative mentioned was to demolish the house, but because the house was more than 50 years old, Development Review staff advised the owner of the need for an evaluation of the house to determine any historic significance. The owner then contacted Anthony Kirk, Ph.D., a professional historian, to prepare an evaluation. Dr- Kirk’s evaluation concluded that the property did not meet any of the criteria for designation as a historic resource. Anthonv Kirk Ph.D., discussed the designation criteria and stated that the property did not meet any of the criteria. Steuhanie Barnes-Castro addressed the Commission again describing her review of the house’s structural elements and that the foundation was not in good structural condition. Elizabeth Schilling disagreed with the interpretation Dr. Kirk made of the historical significance of the house and stated that the house is a typical working class house. Commissioner Fisher stated that she believes that the house is significant, that the additions are historic in their own right, and that the house is important to the chicken ranch history even if it is not a great example of the craftsman style. Commissioner Kennedv stated that the addition of Craftsman additions of the 1920s are significant and not a reason to not designate it as historic, but wishes the County’s consultant was here to address this. Commissioner Fisher moved to recommend that the house be designated as a historic resource at NR5. Commissioner Kennedv seconded the motion, which passed 3-0 .

Twin Lakes church camp and moved NR5. Commissioner Kennedv seconded. l%e motion passed 3-0.

and moved to recommend designation as a historic resource. Commissioner Kennedv seconded. l l e motion passed 3-0

c and architectural integrity in @e a historically designated house ur e

dels.. Dana Clarke, owner,

in good shape. Requests it stay NR6. Commissioner Kennedy speaks about surveys that show value of property is enhanced by designation and that she has talked to local realtors who also say it enhances value. Commissioner Kennedv moves continuance so that consultant can address issues. Commissioner Fisher seconds. Motion passes 3-0.

Page 4 of 8

HRC ORAFT MINUTES 09-14-06

Baptist Church cabins, sees no compelling reason to designate as historic and moved to continue for more input from consultant. Commissioner Fisher seconded. The motion passed 3-0.

historic resource.

rhood has many senio s like her parents who live in

wanting to see insides if designated historic. Joel Harrison, owner, states that house is in worse condition now than when originally surveyed in 1986. Wants any designation delayed due to aged parents living in house. Commissioner Fisher explained what can and can’t be done if it is designated as historic and that nothing would be required to make house look like it did originally. Commissioner Kennedv moved to send to the Board with no recommendation.

moved to recommend designation as a historic reso

addressed the issue of

Quonset huts are everywhere and not historical. Annette Watts, one-half owner of property, says was not aware of review that took place in 1986. Commissioner Kennedy agrees with the staflrecommendation: the buildings are a mishmash and are not viable as historic buildings and no reason to single out this particular Quonset hut and moved to recommend that the buildings on this site and the adjacent 970 I Th Avenue owned by the same parties not be designated

are not viable as his that the buildings on 970 I 7Ih Avenue owned by the same parties not be designated as historic

Page 5 of8

HRC DRAFT MINUTES 09-14-06

it does in the photos taken in 2004: house has b

advised by lawyers and realtors now to let it be designated. Commissioner Kennedv stated that she didn’t think the house had any particular historical significance and should not be designated and she moved to not recommend designation as a historic resource. Commissioner Fisher seconded. The motion passed 3-0.

owner had called and after discussion was agreeable to that. owner had no objection to designating the two houses, but t

building be recommended for

NR6 029-111-47 (old) 029-401-01 through 13 32 Maciel Avenue

Staff informed the Commission that the nursery shed buildings on this property, part of the old htonell i Begonia Gardens, burned to the ground a few years ago and that the Commission need not take any action.

Mexican Rodeo Grounds: south side Soquel Avenue partly in road right-of-way between Mattison Lane and South Rodeo Gulch, extending south for approximately 250 feet on either side of Rodeo Gulch Creek.

Continued 029-031-14, 031-011-31

1 Staff made a brief presentation recommending that the Rodeo Grounds not be designated as a hstoric resource, but be given a rating of NR6, due to the vagueness of the mapping and location description.. Commissioner Fisher stated that

1 she thought the site should be recommended for hstoric designation now. N o m Poitevin stated that the map we have of the site are by nature vague and that he thnks that most of the site is under the fieeway fill and just to the south of the freeway. Commissioner Kennedy stated she thought it should be recommended not to be designated at this time. Commissioner Fisher moved to recommend designation as a historic resource. Commissioner Kennedv couldn’t support, no second. Commissioner Fisher moved to continue to October. Commissioner Kennedv seconded. The motion to continue passed 3-0.

Page 6 of 8

HRC ORAFT MINVTfS 09-14-06

At this point, Chair Manning asked if there was anyone left who wanted to speak on any of the remaining properties. Seeing none, she brought the matter back to the

Commission. Commissioner Fisher moved to recommend the following properties to the Board of Supervisors as recommended by stafJ Commissioner Kennedv

seconded The motion passed 3-0

Staff recommendation was that the house be recommende

I 45 I 1 Chaminade Lane I 102-061-1 2 I NR6

Page 7 of8

HRC DRAFT MINUTES 09-14-06

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

NEW BUSINESS A. Letter of support for Redman House

Staff reported to the Commission the request of the Redman House Foundation for a letter of support for them to use in their efforts to secure grants and other funds for rehabilitation of the Redman House and grounds. Commissioner Fisher moved to direct staff to write such a letter. Commissioner Kennedy seconded. The motion passed 3-0.

B. National Register nomination of Grace Episcopal Church/Boulder Creek First Church of Christ Scientist building (currently San Lorenzo Valley Museum). Staff reported to the Commission on the proposal to support this nomination and that the Board of Supervisors would consider this at their October 17 meeting.

OLD BUSINESS There was no old business.

COMMISSIONER PRESENTATIONS There were no commissioner presentations.

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS There were no written communications

ADJOURNMENT Chair Manning adjourned the meeting at 8:20 p.m.

I _ _ _ / ---------J ,-

:::-'

Page 8 of 8

HRC ORAFT MINUTES 10-12-06

Address

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ

PLANNING DEPARTMENT 701 OCEAN STREET. 4TH FLOOR. SANTA CRUZ. C A 95060

Historic Resources Com&$Tn Recommendation- _1

NPJ +" I

(831) 454-2580 FAX: (831) 454-2131 TDD: (831) 454-2123 TOM BURNS, PLANNING DIRECTOR

HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION DRAFTMINUTES

Friday, October 20, 2006 1 :30 p.m. SPECIAL MEETING

Board of Supervisors Chambers County Building, 5" Floor Santa Cruz CA 95060

I. CALL TO ORDEWROLL CALL Chair Manning called the meeting to order at 1 :37 p.m. Commissioners Present: Commissioners Absent: None Staff Present: Guiney Members of the Public Present: Betsey Lynberg, Alice Centers, Ross Gibson

Borg, Fisher, Kennedy, and Manning.

Norman Poitevin, Richard Nolte, Janey Davis, Mike Achkar,

2. AGENDA APPROVAL OR MODIFICATION Approved as presented.

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There were no minutes to consider.

4. PUBLIC

5.

6. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS A. Continued public hearing to consider a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors

regarding designation of certain properties in Live Oak as historic resources

Page 1 of4

HRC DRAFT MINUTES 10-12-06

backyard agriculture and went to Europe to encourage that there. Merriman was part of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade in the Spanish Civil War. During that time, his wife lived in the house and she and others helped raise funds for the Abraham Lincoln Brigade. Believes that the house is significant for the association with Merriman and the Abraham Lincoln Brigade and that Merriman was the inspiration for the main character in Hemingway’s For Whom the Bell Tolls. Noman Poitevin submitted copies of three newspaper articles showing connection between Merriman and Santa Cruz. Betsev Lvnberg, Redevelopment Agency Administrator, supported the staff recommendation for rating of NR6.

Sheila McElrov, County consultant, discussed the meaning of the N R S and NR6 ratings and that they are flawed in that they do not have the subsets that the National Register and the California Register have. Under the California Register, she would rate this house as CR5S3, wbch means that the house does not rise to the level of a historical landmark, but should be considered in local planning. Commissioner Borg asked what “should be considered in local planning” mean? Sheila McElroy stated that there is no definition of that in the California Register, but that it generally means that the house would have to be looked at again before nay demolition. She doesn’t believe that there is sufficient association between Merriman and the house because he did not live there during his association with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade. Commissioner Manning asked if Sheila was thinking of the California Register subsets when she was completing the DPR form. Sheila McElroy answered yes. Commissioner Fisher stated that she thought the house is a good example of a chicken ranch house. Sheila McElroy stated that the house had been changed, has a picture window, that the setting has changed from farms to commercial and that a person doesn’t look at the house and recognize it as a chicken ranch house. Commissioner Fisher stated that the house needs to be designated as a historic resource with w rating of NR5 so that it can be “considered for planning” in the hture. staff stated that any future discretionary application would be reviewed under CEQA for historic significance. Commissioner Kennedv stated that after looking at the articles Mr Gibson submitted that she did not realize Memam was as well known in Santa Cruz as she had thought. Commissioner Fisher stated that to her the building appears to be in good condition, she understands that it has been altered, but feels that it is important for it association with chicken ranching and with Merriman. She is also aware the building and land is owned by the Redevelopment Agency and believes that the building could be incorporated into a future commercial project and should be designated as a historic resource. Chair Manning stated that she agreed with Commissioner Kennedy regarding the newspaper articles and Merriman’s connections with Santa Cruz. Commissione

to know why the rating is proposed to be changed. Sheila McElroi

setting fiom the 1980s review that would change that recommendation from NR6 to NR5. She stated that in her opinion i should have been designated and rated NR5 in the first place. The additions and changes since then are minor Commissioner Manning asks Sheila McElroy if she had done the original evaluation, would she, at that time, havc recommended the house be NR5? stated yes, she would have recommended NR5. Commissione Manning stated that she doesn’t see where it jumps out as an NR5 and the written description doesn’t state that the h o w has retained its architectural integrity. Sheila McElroy agreed that the original description was thin and didn’t have mucl detail, but it should be NR5 due to arcbtecture. Alice Centers, one of the owners, stated that she had never received thi original report from the 1980s or Sheila McElroy’s update and has not received most notices. She lives on Bethany Curvc in Santa Cruz, but post office often sends her mail to Bethany College in Scotts Valley and vice versa, so she was no prepared to make substantive comments. They are not planning to do anythmg to the house. what are the ramifications o the zoning code? This is our retirement home. Some of the windows are original and they leak badly. Structural portion are substandard. Planning needs to work with the owners and not impose new regulations. Commissioners and staf discuss changes that can be made and use of State Historic Building Code. Dana Clarke, owner, states that the HR( ignores the human factor and that the perception in the community is that designation results is a loss of abou $100,000.00 right off the bat. Would be economic hardship to maintain house according to historic regulations. Staf suggests that staff and Commissioner Fisher could meet with owners at a different time to go over the historic ordinanci and the Historic Building Code and how those apply to the house. Ross Gibson states that the site is the grounds of thi Baptist camp retreat. Alice Centers asks for something in writing about what rules apply. Commissioner

Page 2 of 4

HRC DRAFT MINUTES 10-12-06

Commissioner Kennedy stated that the discussion had gotten very, very far afield from the discussion of whether this should be designated as a historic resource or not. There is no real evidence of the Baptist camp connection and the evidence to support designation is not strong. Commissioner Fisher stated that the commission’s decision must be based on the criteria in the County Code and that the owners can plead their case at the Board of Supervisors. She was concerned that he consultant had not provided more justification for designation. Commissioner Kennedv moved to send this property to the Board with no recommendation. Commissioner Borg seconded. The motion passed 4-0.

house, why upgrade now, is there anything written of the Baptist camp? Sheila McElrov stated that the Sanborn maps indicate the house was one of the Baptist camp cottages. The addition was a successful project in that it is both compatible with the original house, yet is distinguishable from it. Ross Gibson stated that he knows it was one of the Baptist camp cottages due to it being shown on the Sanborn map. Commissioner Fisher commended the owner for doing such compatible additions and repairs and that the paperwork on the house should be updated if this goes forward to the Board. Commissioner Fisher moved to recommend that this house be designated as a historic resource. Commissioner Kennedv seconded. The motion passed 4-0. Janev Davis wanted the record to reflect that designation as a hlstoric resource is not the owner’s nor her desire.

their request.

proposal. The owner, Mike Achkar described project. Chair Manning asked if Mr Achkar was forced into doing the work. Mr Achkar responded no, not at all. Norman Poitevin expressed his appreciation for the care Mr Achkar has taken with the house. Mike Achkar discussed his experiences working with the Historic Resources Commission and staff and that it has been relatively easy. Commissioner Kennedy thinks the proposal looks fine. Commissioner Fisher thinks Mr Achkar has done a really good job with the windows. Commissioner Kennedy moved approval of the proposal as recommended by staff. Commissioner Fisher seconded. The motion passed 4-0.

Page 3 of 4

HRC ORAFT MINUTES 10-12-06

The Commission now returned to consider the last property of the Live Oak historic update, the Mexican Rodeo Grounds.

Mexican Rodeo Grounds: south side Soquel Avenue partly in road right-of-way between Mattison Lane and South Rodeo Gulch, extending south for approximately 250 feet on either side of Rodeo Gulch Creek.

NR6 029-031-14, 031 -01 1 3 1

Staff made a brief presentation recommending that the Rodeo Grounds not be designated as a historic resource, but be given a rating of NR6, due to the vagueness of the mapping and location description.. Ross Gibson discussed Phil Reader’s thorough research in this site and the meticulous details of the 1853 Coast Survey map and location of the rodeo grounds. Commissioner Kennedy stated that she felt the location was too vague to designate as historic. Commissioner Fisher suggested that the site could be designated or, if need more specific mapping, could go NR6 now and try to pursue archaeological work and maybe thereafter be designated as historic. Commissioner Borg moved to recommend that the site be given a rating of NR6 at this time. Commissioner Kennedv seconded. The motion passed 3-1 (Fisher).

7. NEW BUSINESS There was not new business.

8. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business.

9. COMMISSIONER PRESENTATIONS There were no Commissioner presentations. Slrl

Page 4 of 4

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ PLANNING DEPARTMENT

701 OCEAN STREET. qTH FLOOR. SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060 (831 ) 454-2580 FAX: (831 ) 454-21 31 TOO: (831 ) 454-21 23

TOM BURNS, PLANNING DIRECTOR

HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES

Thursday, Januaw 11,2007 5:30 p.m. REGULAR MEETING Santa Cruz CA 95060

Planning Department Small Conference Room County Building, 4'h Floor

I. CALL TO ORDEWROLL CALL Chair Manning called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. Commissioners Present: Commissioners Absent: None Staff Present: Guiney, Bussey Members of the Public Present:

Borg, Fisher, Kennedy, and Manning.

Graham Bubb, Mathew Rose, and Mike Achkar

2. AGENDA APPROVAL OR MODIFICATION There were no agenda modifications.

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES _--

L- -"-I __---

__/-

There were no minutes to consider. - --

, ____. .- '. 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS (Members.,af-tQe public ma'b speak-oy) items not & thk

- , : ', ! {,-.. . ---i

- _. I

I I \ i.

: i L..----'

agenda) i . '\

;i I e-.',,

No one spoke opan-Ifem . n i on the ag,&n&\, : A '\.,, \ \\

', \>--'-'-) j , _., ,I

i , 4:'

/ 5. ~-*-..-'- ' .~QN~ENT ITEM,S l__ '\ > . ' , .

'\, hhe\e were no consebth,m$.b,. ,

A.

.. . * I

? ' a , ; < ; : L./'

6. ': i, _. ..--- PUBLI6 HEARING ITEMS Historic Preservation Plan Application 06-0722 of Michael and Kristine Achkar for after-the-fact approval to remove existing exterior shingle siding and replace with matching material on an existing historic resource at 710 17'h Ave., Live Oak. APN: 028-052-63.

Staff presented the item and recommended that the Commission approve the amendment with conditions. Chair Manning opened the public hearing. Mr. Achkar and his associates, Mr. Bubb and Mr. Rose provided testimony. It was noted that the structure had termite damage and that the project engineer directed the shear wall be placed on the exterior rather than the interior walls. Mr. Achkar indicated that Inspection services required the design since it was considered a reconstruction. The Public Hearing was closed and the item brought back to the Commission.

There ensued a discussion, which focused on the window design and placement, the siding, the piecemeal approach of this project and the oversight to insure compliance. Commissioner Fisher was concerned about the placement and design of the new windows, even though the HRC had previously approved the location. Commissioner Fisher also stated that a conflict exists between Inspection Services and HRC regarding the reconstruction code requirements. Commissioner Kennedy was concerned about the “piece meal” approach being taken by the applicant with respect to the Historic structure. Commissioner Manning was concerned about the project oversight and the compliance with and conditions.

Commissioner Fisher moved to approve the Historic Preservation Plan as recommended by staff with the following additional conditions:

Recommend to the Planning Commission that a condition be placed on Minor Land Division request 05-0606 requiring that the HRC be satisfied with the reconstruction prior to the recording of the Parcel Map. That the applicant keep in contact with staff regarding the process and suggested requesting staff review of the siding and window changes prior to completion of the work to insure the correct exposure for the shakes. That oversight by staff is made to insure compliance. Those windows facing the streets (south and west bedroom and kitchen) are modified such that they are more in keeping with the original window design. That a HOLD be placed on the Building Permit for all the authorized work, and that the HOLD may be released after the exterior work has been completed. That the roof may be reconstructed, with the look maintaining the same design and pitch. OG gutters shall be used and shall be painted.

0

__-I

\ ..’ ._ . - ~. --- ”,

, __. ..’, Commissioner Kennedy seconded. The motion passed 4-0.

-. . _- ,, ..

i t

_ _ _ --. ’

i /..-.~

i ’ ..., x. \ ’

--. . ’

7. NEW BUSINESS ,

__ .-, _- I . t ,

There was no new business. i i *_ \~.

i ,,.. i . *.l \,\

I :~

XI / !,\> \ \ ! , ~

I _ __ , 1, 8. OLD BUSINESS---*’ y.-”-.? ~ - - - - - - . , ‘ - ~ ~ m ~ s s i o ~ e r Fis#t$’hot&$d that sh$had-meWitb the Supervisors for that area who had some ’; @o?kerns regarding the~qcohq?endatims ; on several of the proposed sites.

I ? 1 1 i

; ; , i : ,A

:>, 3aff ,ndted that the proposed amendments Historic Resources inventory for the Live Oak area to go to the Board of Supervisors on 01 23.07.

Staff also noted that the Historic Incentives Ordinance Amendments as modified by the California Coastal Commission are pending at the Board of Supervisors for approval.

9. COMMISSIONER PRESENTATIONS Commissioner Kennedy announced the former Episcopal Church the San Lorenzo Valley Museum has been accepted to the National Register. She requested that an item be set on the next agenda (presentation by Lisa Robinson) regarding the National Register process. She also invited all to the opening of the W.C.T.U. exhibit at the San Lorenzo Valley Museum on 01 28.07.

Commissioner Borg noted that the Pajaro Valley Historic Society has begun digitizing photographs. She indicated that some interesting information has come out of this so far.

Commissioner Fisher mentioned that parties desiring to significantly modify the historic Hollins

House had contacted her.

i I

Commissioner Fisher noted that she had received comments regarding what being designated historic means and suggested amending the ordinance or making available an article or some other educational material to the public.

Commissioner Fisher and Commissioner Kennedy indicated that they would not be available for the February meeting. The February meeting was cancelled and the next meeting will be on March 8, 2007.

Commissioner’s Manning, Borg, Fisher, and Kennedy thanked Mr. Guiney for his work with the Commission.

I O . WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS No written communications.

11. ADJOURNMENT Chair Manning adjourned the meeting at 7:45 p.m.