14
Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response

Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s

Response

Page 2: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

King County

Page 3: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

Lower Green River Valley

Page 4: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

Green River Flood Protection Facilities

•  Howard Hanson

Dam built in 1962.

•  138 levees and revetments along almost 40 river miles.

Page 5: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

January 2009 Flood Event

•  heavy rain in early 2009

•  the storage reservoir at the dam rose to a record level

•  two depressions were observed

•  Construction of a temporary seepage barrier grout curtain until a permanent solution was identified and implemented

H.  Hanson  Dam  January  2009  at  maximum  flood  pool,    Courtesy  of  Army  Corps  of  Engineers    Sea@le  District  

Page 6: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

Warnings of increased flood risk below Howard Hanson Dam

•  Possibly 2X the design

capacity of the downstream levee system

•  1 in 3 chance of significant flooding

•  Created the biggest challenge to flood control since the construction of the dam in 1962

Page 7: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

Economic Impacts of Flood Damages

•  damage of $1.34 billion-$3.77 billion

•  Direct and secondary impacts up to $32 billion, 132,554 lost jobs, and $8 billion in lost wages

•  Long-term impacts on the economy would be felt through 2030

Page 8: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

Overview of Emergency Response Preparations

•  King County and the King County Flood Control District played a major role

–  Coordination with cities and vital services

–  King County provided over $29 million in emergency funds for protection and relocation of critical facilities

–  The King County Flood Control District budgeted $12 million for temporary advanced measures

Page 9: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

Flood Protection of King County Buildings and Facilities •  South Wastewater Treatment Plant

•  Regional Justice Center

•  King County Elections Center

•  District Court

• King County Animal Shelter

Relocated King County Facilities Radio Shop, Kent Probation Offices, Regional Public Health offices, King County Seized Vehicle Storage

Maleng  Regional  JusDce  Center  Ecology  Block  Wall  

Kent  Animal  Shelter-­‐sandbags  

Page 10: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

10  

   

•  Temporary Levees installed due to elevated flood risk while HHD was compromised.

•  Installed along 26 miles of levees

•  Partnership with the Cities of Kent, Tukwila and Auburn

•  Approximate King County Flood District budget for installation, maintenance and removal: $12 million.

Temporary Advanced Measures

Page 11: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

Flood Patrol and Communication Improvements

•  Early coordination and

increased flood patrols

•  Levee inspection training by Corps of Engineers

•  King County Flood Patrol books provided to all jurisdiction and Corps of Engineers

•  Uniform Communication Radio System for all jurisdiction and Corps of Engineers

Page 12: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

Enhanced Public Outreach •  Flood Warning Brochure;

produced in multiple languages

•  Expanded roll-out of automated Flood Warning System

•  Enhanced public meetings during October Flood Awareness Campaign

•  Flood Preparedness and Safety Video in over 20 different languages

•  Developed and distributed extensive print and online media communication

Page 13: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

•  Dam has returned to normal flood operations.

•  2007-2012 Flood District expenditures $31.2 Million

•  2013-2018 revised six year CIP $67.1 Million

•  Partnerships with USACE, Green River Cities, and Washington State essential to success.

Reddington  Levee  Setback,  Auburn  

Myers  Golf,  Kent  

Current Status

•  FEMA did not help fund regional 2009-2011 hazard mitigation below the dam

•  Downstream flood hazards are a continuing regional priority

Page 14: Howard Hanson Dam and King County’s Response Hague.pdfbelow Howard Hanson Dam • Possibly 2X the design capacity of the downstream levee system • 1 in 3 chance of significant

Final slide

Jane Hague

Board of Supervisors, King County Flood Control District

[email protected]

On the Web:

www.kingcountyfloodcontrol.org