20
1 DEPARTMENT OF WORK, ORGANISATION AND SOCIETY How work and organizational psychology can contribute in tackling jointly work related problems : examples and learning points Peter Vlerick Ghent, January 19 th 2021 Master in Clinical Psychology (1989) thesis : ‘Research into the role of attributional and emotional processes in aggressive primary school children’ PhD in Industrial Psychology (1994) Thesis : ‘Research on the antecedents and consequences of burnout among nurses in general hospitals’ Assistant professor in Economic Psychology (1997) Full Professor in Occupational Health Psychology (2019) 2

How work and organizational psychology can contribute in

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

DEPARTMENT OF WORK, ORGANISATION AND SOCIETY

How work and organizational psychology can

contribute in tackling jointly work related

problems : examples and learning points

Peter Vlerick

Ghent, January 19th 2021

Master in Clinical Psychology (1989)thesis : ‘Research into the role of attributional and emotional processes in aggressive primary

school children’

PhD in Industrial Psychology (1994) Thesis : ‘Research on the antecedents and consequences of burnout among nurses in general

hospitals’

Assistant professor in Economic Psychology (1997)

Full Professor in Occupational Health Psychology (2019)

2

2

What contribution can work and Organizational psychology make?

3

Ugent@work : common interest & shared responsibility

similarities & differences

Overarching objective WOP : “contributing to the quality of working life in terms of

employee well-being and effective work organization”

How ? : *influencing policy making in academia and practice;

*taking up responsibilities towards individuals, organisations, industrial sectors and society

*cocreation :

* fundamental and applied research

*monodisciplinary, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research

….

4

3

PAST : Finished doctoral disserations

1. Dr. Stefanie De Man (2004) : quality of care and psychology of

waiting in outpatient clinics

2. Dr. Rik Verhaeghe (2006) : Stress and sickness absence in hospital

nurses3. Dr. Isabel Rots (2010) : Teacher education and the choice for the

teaching profession

4. Dr. Bart Van de Ven (2011) : Demand-induced-strain compensation

model in the technology sector

5. Dr. Anneleen Mortier (2017) : authentic leadership

6. Dr. Elien De Boeck (2018) : Food safety work climate in Food

Industry

7. Dr. Bart Doyen (2020) : blackbox in the operating room : ‘Radiation

Safety‘

8. Dr. Bram Van Acker (2020): Mental workload monitoring in the

Manufacturing Industry5

Employee-related antecedents of the waiting

experience and service quality

in outpatient clinics

Doctoral student: Stefanie De Man

Promotors: Paul Gemmel & Peter Vlerick

6

4

Customer-contact

service employee

behavior

Customer waiting experience

Customer service evaluations

Customer-contact service employee

Customer

Basic model

Service encounter

7

Customer service evaluations

Wait satisfaction

Service quality perceptions

•Tangibles•Reliability

•Responsiveness•Assurance•Empathy

Customer satisfaction

8

5

Work Characteristics, Psychological

Well-Being and Sickness Absence among

Hospital Nurses

Doctoral student: Rik Verhaeghe

Promotors: Paul Gemmel & Peter Vlerick

9

10

Conceptual research model

6

Teacher education and the choice for the teaching profession

11

Doctoral student: Isabel Rots

Promotors: Antonia Aelterman & Peter Vlerick

12

Conceptual research model

7

13

Rots, I., Aelterman, A., Devos, G. & Vlerick, P. (2010). Teacher education and the choice to enter the

teaching profession: a prospective study. Teaching and Teacher Education,26, 1619-1629.

Psychosocial well-being of employees in the technology sector:

The interplay of job demands and job resources

14

Doctoral student: Bart Van de Ven

Promotor: Peter Vlerick

8

Conceptual model

15

ACTING UPON THE TRUE SELF: THE ROLE OF AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIP IN

ENHANCING FOLLOWERS’ WELL-BEING AT WORK

Doctoral student: Anneleen Mortier

Promotor: Peter Vlerick

16

9

CONCEPTUEEL MODEL

17

Antecedent:

Hechtingsstijl leider

Mediërende variable:

Empathie

Modererende variable:

Veranderingspercepties

Welzijn van volgers:

Authentiek volgerschap

Thriving

Job tevredenheid

Studie 1

Studie 4

Studie 3

Studie 2

Studie 2Studie 3Studie 4

Authentiek leiderschap

FOOD SAFETY CULTURE AND CLIMATE,

EXPLORING THE HUMAN FACTOR IN

FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF FOOD TECHNOLOGY, SAFETY AND HEALTHFACULTY OF BIOSCIENCE ENGINEERING, GHENT UNIVERSITY

18

Doctoral student :ir. Elien De Boeck

Promotors :Liesbeth Jacxsens, Peter Vlerick and Mieke Uyttendaele

10

19

Overall Objective: ‘Explore the human factor in food safety

management by studying the impact of an

organization’s food safety culture and climate’.

7 Chapters

20

CONCEPTUAL MODEL

11

Safety in the Hybrid Angiography Suite:Opening Pandora’s Box

21

Doctoral student: Bart DoyenPromotors: Isabelle Van Herzeele, Frank Vermassen & Peter Vlerick

BLACK BOX

RADIATION SAFETY IN THE HYBRID ANGIOGRAPHY SUITE - CONCLUSION

22

SAFETY

Well-being Team performance

+Team Patient

Medical physics

Vascular surgery

Psychology

12

23

What factors affect safety in the hybrid angiography suite? STUDY 1 Communication styles

STUDY 2 (Radiation) safety climates

STUDY 3 Key competencies in radiation safety

How do we capture safety in the hybrid angiography suite? STUDY 4 Implementation of Operating room Black Box

How do we evaluate safety in the hybrid angiography suite? STUDY 5 Development of a radiation safety rating scale

STUDY 6 Operating room Black Box Pilot study

3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS - 6 EMPIRICAL STUDIES

24

13

VAKGROEP INDUSTRIËLE SYSTEMEN EN PRODUCTONTWERP (EA18)ONDERZOEKSGROEP IMEC-MICT-UGENT

VAKGROEP WERK, ORGANISATIE EN SAMENLEVING (PP09)

Mental Workload Monitoring in the Manufacturing Industry: Conceptualisation,

Operationalisation and Implementation

Doctoral student : Bram Van Acker

Promotors :Jelle Saldien & Peter Vlerick

25

1.1 MAAKINDUSTRIE

26

Digitalisatie +

automatisatie

Complexiteit

Mentale belasting

14

1.1 MAAKINDUSTRIE

27

Vroeger:

Massaproductie

*mentale belasting:

laag

*Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2014). State of science: Mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics, 58(1), 1–17.

1.1 MAAKINDUSTRIE

28

vandaag:

Massa variatie

*mentale belasting:

hoger

*Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2014). State of science: Mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics, 58(1), 1–17.

15

1.1 MAAKINDUSTRIE

29

België:

‘mass

customization’

1.1 MAAKINDUSTRIE

30

Ondersteuning

operator

‘Exosekeltons’

‘Augmented Reality’

‘Cobots’

‘Touch pads’

Mentale belasting?

16

STRUCTURE OF PHD-THESIS

1. Conceptualisation : What is mental workload?

2. Operationalisation : How can we measure mental workload on the shop floor ?

3. Implementation: How can we best implement mental workload monitoring ?

31

CONCLUSION THESIS

32

Optimalisation ofoperators’ mental workload (Human engineering)

Competitiveness of Flemish Manufacturing industry 4.0

17

Ongoing doctoral disssertations1. Lien Valcke : Psycho-social well-being and precarious work

circumstances in Aviation industry (pilots and cabin crew)

2. Waeel Alrobaish : from ‘food fraud’ towards ’food integrity’ in

Food Industry3. Ruben Cambier : Psychological underpinning of computer-

mediated-communication : telepresssure during and after

working hours (‘teleclimate’)

4. Gilles Soenens : human error and non-technical skills

assessment in Surgery5. Pauline Spangnoli : Food Safety Culture intervention

6. N.N. : Work rehabilitation and disability management

33

SYNTHESIS

Lack of focus/no single topic/theme

Variety in professional groups

Variety in industrial sectors

Variety of work, organisational and societal

problems

Common is : * ‘Work’

* a psychological/ human

complementary approach

Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary (sometimes

monodisciplinary)

Within and between university faculties

Deductive and inductive 34

18

CONCLUSION

‘Work’ & ‘employment’ are complex, multifacetted

From monodisciplinary towards Crossdisciplinary

research (Multidisciplinary - Interdisciplinary )

Individual & work & organizational characteristics

matter

psychological processes(human factors) matter

Work and organizational psychology is important

Psychology contributes35

36

DO NOT BREAK YOUR WALL BUT CONSIDER to LOOK OVER YOUR WALL AND TO ENRICH YOUR WALL

TAKE HOME MESSSAGE

19

“Whatever you can do or dream you can do, begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic in it. Begin it now!”

Goethe

THANK YOU

20

Questions ?

Suggestions ?

Info : @[email protected]