Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
How We Got Here
The Oregon Geospatial Data Sharing Saga
Early Developments
• Late 1990’s - ORS 190.050 allows local governments to charge for geospatial data
• Oregon Legislature authorized creation of ORMAP program in 1999 for land ownership and property tax mapping purposes
• February 2000 - Executive Order 00-02 authorized the Oregon Geographic Information Council (OGIC) to, among other things, facilitate geospatial data sharing
• OWRD and Deschutes County signed a geospatial data sharing agreement in July 2000
• Framework concept initiated in Oregon in September 2000
• OGIC developed a 13 page document in December 2002 on data sharing and confidentiality
OGIC Data Sharing Activities
• July 2003 – OGIC drafts document outlining core data sharing issues related to Framework data
• November 2004 – OGIC drafts MOU to share geospatial Framework data with state, federal, local agencies…reviewed by DOJ but never finalized or adopted
• Comprehensive geospatial data license approved by OGIC in December 2004 for all Framework data elements to be shared by locals with state and/or federal agencies
• Only a handful of local governments ever signed the comprehensive license
• DAS established a statewide policy in September 2005 to guide data sharing using the OGIC data license
A New Partnership Proposed
• August 2006, OGIC proposed a new data sharing partnership with local government
• Association of Oregon Counties agreed and signed a letter of support
• Partnership included a $5M GF funding proposal that was made to the Legislature
• Funding proposal was included in the Governor’s proposed 2007-09 budget for DAS
• Ultimately, funding was not included within the 2007-09 Legislatively Adopted Budget
Data Sharing for Some Framework Themes
• In 2008, ODOT and Revenue initiated, on behalf of OGIC, data sharing
agreements for roads and tax lots, respectively
• As of 2015, nine counties still refuse to share roads and/or tax lot data
• Also in 2008, Oregon Emergency Management initiated, on behalf of
OGIC, data sharing agreements with 911 centers to share some Framework
data sets
• As of 2015, most are only willing to share with other 911 centers
Other OGIC Activities
• In 2009, the State CIO, as OGIC Chair, wrote to the AG to urge changes to
the piece-meal process that had been used to make exceptions to the public
records law
• No response was received from the AG
• In 2011, OGIC endorsed a resolution strongly encouraging all government
agencies to share geospatial data with each other
• The resolution was widely circulated in the geospatial community
Legislative Concepts
• In April 2012, the State CIO, as Chair of OGIC, proposed to DAS leadership
a legislative concept (LC) to mandate geospatial Framework data sharing
between state and local agencies for public safety and emergency response
• It was not put forward by DAS for the 2013 legislative session
• In March 2014, the State CIO, as Chair of OGIC, proposed a revised LC to
mandate geospatial Framework data sharing between state and local agencies
• It was not put forward by DAS for the 2015 legislative session
Legislative Concepts
• July - November 2015: Legislative concept drafting concluded with JLCIMT voting on November 17, 2015 to proceed with pre-session filing of three legislative concepts, including LC 121 related to geospatial data sharing among public bodies
• LC 121 was based on the 2014 OGIC-endorsed legislative concept
• November 2015 - January 2016: Stakeholder outreach conducted with the Association of Oregon Counties, League of Oregon Cities, Metro, OGIC, OSBEELS, and several county and city GIS representatives in different areas of the state
• January 15, 2016: JLCIMT voted to introduce LC 121 as a JLCIMT Committee bill in the 2016 legislative session; HB 4056 (LC 121) pre-session released to the public – Jan. 27, 2016
House Bill 4056 &
Geospatial Data Sharing Work Group
• February 2016 - The introduced version of HB 4056 received a first reading and was
referred to the JLCIMT on February 1
• In response to stakeholder feedback/requests, the JLCIMT Co-Chair’s decided not to hold a
public hearing or work session on HB 4056
• February 26, 2016 – JLCIMT holds an informational meeting on geospatial data sharing and
calls for creation of a JLCIMT/State CIO sponsored, multi-jurisdictional geospatial data
sharing work group
• March - April 2016 - JLCIMT/State Geospatial Data Sharing Work Group formed with the
kickoff meeting scheduled for April 8, 2016