Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
How to Progress Monitor Behavior Goals
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 1
This event is being funded with State and/or Federal funds and is being provided for employees of school districts, employees of the Mississippi Department of Education and Department contractors. Miss. Const. Art. 4, Section 6 prohibits governing authorities from making donations. According to the Mississippi Attorney General, once the Federal funds are turned over to the State, the rules for the expenditure of State funds apply. Based on Mississippi law, this event is not being provided for third party vendors or external providers.
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 2
Vision _________________________________
To create a world-class educational system that gives students the knowledge and skills to be successful in college and the workforce, and to flourish as parents and citizens
Mission _______________________________
To provide leadership through the development of policy and accountability systems so that all students are prepared to compete in the global community
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 3
All Proficient and Showing Growth in All Assessed Areas
Every Student Graduates High School and is Ready for College and Career
Every Child Has Access to a High-Quality Early Childhood Program
Every School Has Effective Teachers and Leaders
Every Community Effectively Using a World-Class Data System to Improve Student Outcomes
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 4
• The Office of Special Education (OSE) has a teacher listserv available for special education teachers.
• The purpose of the listserv will be to inform special education teachers of upcoming trainings, upcoming webinars, and other resources provided by MDE.
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 5
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 6
This training is designed to provide classroom teachers with practical strategies for progress monitoring Measurable Annual Goals and Short Term Instructional Objectives for Behavior.
The use of these strategies is aligned to the Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) Strategic Plan.
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 7
Why do we progress monitor?
1.) We want to ensure the instructional methods that are in place result in mastery of the Measurable Annual Goal.
2.) If progress toward the Measurable Annual Goal is not being made, we want to know in a timely manner so the BIP and/or the goal can be revised.
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 8
Steps to Progress Monitoring Measurable Annual Goals for Behavior
1.) Determine the most appropriate method for assessing and reporting a student’s Current Level of Progress (CLP) toward the measurable annual goal.
2.) Calculate the expected Rate of Improvement.
3.) Progress monitoring data must be collected and examined.
4.) At the frequency specified in the Notification of Progress Provided to Parents/Guardians the student’s performance on all of the STIOs must be assessed.
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 9
Identify the Method of Measurement for the Annual Goal• OBS = Observation
• CRT = Criterion-Referenced Test
• CBM = Curriculum-Based Measure
• WS = Work Samples
• D/P = Demonstration/Performance
• Other: ______________________
Identify the type of data collection that will be used. Make sure the type of data collected measures progress toward the annual goal and reflects the method of measurement indicated on the IEP.
• Frequency/Rate
• Duration
• Interval
• Latency
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 10
Example
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 11
MEASURABLE ANNUAL GOAL
Goal
#Measurable Annual Goal MOM
5
In 36 weeks, when given independent assignment of mastered skills,
the student will complete the task, soliciting help appropriately, as
needed, 95% of observed intervals with verbal redirection to do so.
OBS
Obj.
#Short-Term Instructional Objectives/Benchmarks (STIO/B)
1
In 9 weeks when given an independent assignment of mastered skills, the student will
solicit help by raising her hand and waiting quietly 95% of instances observed with
no more than two verbal prompts to do so.
2
In 27 weeks, when given an independent assignment of mastered skills, the student
will complete the assignment 95% of observed instances with no more than two
verbal prompts to do so.
The method of measurement is observation. The best data collection method for this would be to
collect data based on the number of opportunities the behavior of raising hand could occur vs. the
number of times the student actually raised her hand.
In order to determine if progress is being made, we need to understand what the expected Rate of Improvement (ROI) is.
The ROI is simply the average data points that must be gained each week in order to meet the STIO:
(outcome behavior rate – baseline behavior rate)
Sufficient ROI = ______________________________________
Timeframe from introduction to mastery of STIO.
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 12
Example:
lkjk
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 13
Obj.
#Short-Term Instructional Objectives/Benchmarks (STIO/B)
1
In 9 weeks when given an independent assignment of mastered skills, the
student will solicit help by raising her hand and waiting quietly 95% of
instances observed with no more than two verbal prompts to do so.
(95% accuracy – 40% accuracy)Sufficient ROI = ________________________________
9 weeks= 55 percentage points of improvement /9 weeks= 6.1 percentage points of improvement per week
6.1 percentage points is the expected number of percentage points per week. However, we
know that skills do not always increase at a steady rate. Therefore, the goal is to see
consistent progress. You can use the expected percentage points to gauge whether or not it
is going to be possible to meet the mastery criteria.
At this point, instruction will begin to teach the skill in acquisition and the teacher will begin collecting data.
Each week, the teacher will review the collected data to ensure that progress is being made toward mastery of the STIO. When reviewing weekly data, the teacher will need to look at the ROI, and the overall progress toward mastery.
It is highly recommended that progress monitoring of data be graphed.
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 14
Example
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 15
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Total ROI
Week
1
-
-
-
-
+
1/5 -
-
-
+
+
2/5 -
-
-
+
+
2/5 +
-
-
-
+
2/5 +
+
+ -
+
4/5 11/25
44%
4 percentage points
Week
2
-
-
-
+
+
2/5 -
-
+
+
+
3/5 -
-
-
+
+
2/5 +
+
+
-
+
4/5 +
+
-
- +
3/5 14/25
56%
12 percentage
points
Week
3
-
-
+
+
+
3/5 -
-
+
+
+
3/5 -
+
-
+
+
3/5 +
+
+
-
+
4/5 +
+
-
+
+
4/5 17/25
68%
12 percentage
points
Week
4
-
+
-
+
+
3/5 +
-
+
+
+
4/5 -
-
+
+
+
3/5 +
+
+
-
+
4/5 +
+
+
- +
4/5 18/25
72%
4 percentage points
The student will raise her hand in order to request help.Baseline – 40%
The teacher records every opportunity that is presented for the student to raise her hand and wait patiently for help. Only the opportunities when the student is successful in raising her hand to request attention are given a “+”.
Example
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 16
The student will raise her hand in order to request help.Baseline – 40%
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Total ROI
Week 5 -
-
+
+
+
3/5 -
+
-
+
+
3/5 +
+
-
+
+
4/5 +
+
+
-
+
4/5 + +
+ -
+
4/5 18/25
72%
0 percentage
points
Week 6 +
-
-
+
+
3/5 -
-
+
+
+
3/5 +
+
-
+
+
4/5 +
+
+
-
+
4/5 +
+
+
+ +
5/5 19/25
76%
4 percentage
points
Week 7 +
-
+
+
+
4/5 -
+
+
+
+
4/5 -
+
+
+
+
4/5 +
+
+
+
+
5/5 +
+
-
+ +
4/5 21/25
84%
8 percentage
points
Week 8 +
+
-
+
+
4/5 +
+
+
+
+
5/5 -
+
+
+
+
4/5 +
+
+
+
+
5/5 +
+
+
+ +
5/5 23/25
92%
8 percentage
points
Week 8 +
+
-
+ +
4/5 +
+
+ +
+
5/5 -
+
+ +
+
4/5 +
++ +
+
5/5 +
+
++
+
5/5 23/25
92%
8 percentage
points
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 17
The student’s performance on all of the STIOs must be assessed.
The statement of the student’s Current Level of Performance (CLP) toward his/her measurable annual goal should identify:
(a) Any STIOs that have been mastered;
(b) Any STIOs that have not been introduced;
(c) The student’s current level of performance on any STIOs that have been introduced, but not yet mastered.
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 18
Sharon Strong Coon Julie Lowery
Autism Instructional Specialist EmD Instructional Specialist
[email protected] [email protected]
April Rice
Office Director
Tanya Bradley
Bureau Director
Office of Special Education
Division of Instructional Support
601-359-3498
www.mde.k12.ms.us/specialeducation
2015-2016 @ Division of Instructional Support 19
