Upload
shonda-thompson
View
214
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
How to evaluate China GDP growth with the impact of SARS by Meta-synthesis System Approach
NSFC Major project 79990580
September 11, 2003
IIASA CSM Special Session on Meta-Synthesis
2003-9-11 2
Contents
• Brief introduction to the Metasynthesis System Approach
• Introduction to a collaborative Tool: PathMaker
• Introduction to Experiment– Test Flow– PathMaker Template– Strength & Weakness
2003-9-11 3
Brief introduction to the Metasynthesis System Approach
• Metasynthesis approach aims to unite organically the data, information, model and experience to solve the open complex giant system problems.
• The design of Hall of Workshop for Meta-synthetic Engineering (HWMSE) contributes to collect and develop the knowledge and wisdom or creation directly from experts and decision makers who attend the discussion meeting in this Hall.
2003-9-11 4
Knowledge System
Reform World
Result Recognition of World
Machine System
PropositionExpert System
Social Recognition
Social Practice
Objective World
Generic Framework of HWMSE
2003-9-11 5
Qualitative Meta-Synthesis
Qualitative-Quantitative Meta-Synthesis
Meta-SynthesisFrom Qualitative Hypothesis to
Quantitative Validation
Contents of Meta-synthesis
2003-9-11 6
For realizing the MSA we design a flowchart: from synchronous meeting I to asynchronous analysis, then synchronous meeting II. If the problem is not solving ,we will iterate this process again and again until getting some solution, or consensus.
2003-9-11 7
Synchronous I
Asynchronous
Synchronous II
Meeting Process in HWMSE
2003-9-11 8
Synchronous IAsynchronous
Synchronous II
Data
Information
Knowledge
Case
Divergent
Convergent
ECB, GAE, etc.
PathMaker
Hypotheses,
Scenarios
2003-9-11 9
AsynchronousSynchronous I Synchronous II
Modeling by Mechanism
Modeling by Rules
Modeling by Data
Modeling by Learning
Modeling by Evolutionary
Scenario
Econometric Model
Time Series,
RA
Modeling by Case
Multi-Agent Simulation
2003-9-11 10
Synchronous IIAsynchronousSynchronous I
Possibly Satisfying Approach
Meta-Synthesis System
Reconstruction
AHP, Nominal Group,
ECB
PathMaker, ExpertChoice
2003-9-11 11
AsynchronousSynchronous I Synchronous II
Modeling Agent
Seminar Room(Xi’an)
Seminar Room(Beijing)
Main Hall(Beijing) (see Dai,
Cui & Li’s reports)
Decision Technologies
Agent
Introduction to a collaborative Tool: PathMaker
2003-9-11 13
• As a software tool for assisting teams or individuals to improve their projects or solving problems by discussion and analysis.
• We use it as a tool for applying MSA to solving the problems in the macroeconomic system.
• Some other tools or methods are also applied, such as Group Argumentation Environment, Data mining and some economic models as mentioned before.
2003-9-11 14
5 components
8 kinds of tools
2003-9-11 15
Starting a project with Pathway
• Pathway is an important concept of PathMaker, Each project follows a pathway. The pathway is the backbone of a project, providing access to tools, meetings, and just-in-time instruction. Users make project plan, use different tools, arrange meeting, create agenda and so on in the Project Pathway.
2003-9-11 16
The Pathway of MSA Test in IIASA by PathMaker /1
2003-9-11 17
The Pathway of MSA Test in IIASA by PathMaker /2
2003-9-11 18
Other four parts along with a Project Pathway: • Project Information: All the information about the pr
ojects can be included in Project Information.
• Team Member: The information of all the team member, including members’ names, passwords, limitation, and their responsibility are recorded and managed here.
• Action Items: Includes ID, description, person responsible, deadline and status.
• Discussion History: Every team member can design and trigger an on-line discussion, either in a intranet or in internet
Introduction to IIASA Experiment
2003-9-11 20
Preparation
• One preparation meeting for discussion Time, Place, Team Members, Meeting Tools and Action Items in the meeting.– Place:Conference room in IIASA
– Chairman: Jifa Gu and Makowski Marek
– Team Member:
– Meeting Tools: computers; projectors; printer; reticles and Software (PathMaker, Expert Choice, Internet)
– Meeting Action Item:
2003-9-11 21
Prepare Meeting M0
2003-9-11 22
2003-9-11 23
2003-9-11 24
2003-9-11 25
M1-1 Free Discussion
2003-9-11 26
2003-9-11 27
Free Discussion by Brainstorming / Affinity Tool
2003-9-11 28
Group Argumentation by GAE (See Tang’s report)
2003-9-11 29
Registration to GAE/Pathmaker
ID Name password
Beulens Adrie Beulens adrie
Makowski Marek Makowski marek
Naka Y. Nakamori naka
Pawlak Zdzislaw Pawlak pawl
Granat Janusz Granat granat
Michal W.Michalowsk michal
Lewan A. Lewandowski lewan
2003-9-11 30
M1-3 Further Discussion
2003-9-11 31
• Cause and effect diagram is a versatile tool for arranging ideas in a tree structure. Cause & Effect Tool can be used to discover the reasons for a certain result. It denotes the cause-effect relationship in a tree form. Uses include the traditional fault tree or root cause analysis, organization diagramming, parts hierarchies, project planning, tree diagrams, and the 5 Whys.
• Force Field Tool can be used to analyze and display the driving forces and restraining forces of a transformation. It is composed of four columns. From the left to right, the first column denotes the driving forces, the second denotes how strong the driving forces are, the third denotes how strong the restraining forces are and the fourth denotes the restraining forces.
2003-9-11 32
Cause and effect diagram about High development scenario
2003-9-11 33
Force Field Analysis
2003-9-11 34
Analysis
Use different models to making analysis of macroeconomic system
• Model I: Modeling by knowing mechanism of system,e.g. econometric model (See Zhou’s report)
• Model II: Modeling by Data, such as some Data Mining models (See Tian’s report)
• Model III: System Reconstructability Analysis (see Gu’s report)
2003-9-11 35
Consensus Building Tool
2003-9-11 36
Using Consensus Builder not only can evaluate and quantify opinions, but also can structurize the discussion. There are three methods users can use to build consensus with this tool, which are:
1. Rating Vote
2. Multivote
3. Group Multivote
Discussion of Strength and Weakness(all participants)
2003-9-11 38