40
McApple University Division of Student Affairs Professional Program February 17, 2008 Kim Becker, Ryan Hamachek* & Cari Urabe Seattle University

How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

  • Upload
    sherri

  • View
    36

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective. Division of Student Affairs Professional Program February 17, 2008 Kim Becker, Ryan Hamachek* & Cari Urabe Seattle University. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Division of Student Affairs Professional Program

February 17, 2008Kim Becker, Ryan Hamachek* & Cari Urabe

Seattle University

Page 2: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

“Despite the increase in all types of technology, little is known about how these technologies

impact student development” (as cited in Llyod, Dean, & Cooper, 2007, p.483).

Page 3: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Outcomes

Page 4: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Overview

Page 5: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

With the increase of online social networks, virtual classrooms, and access to information, how are racism, sexism, homophobia, and

heterosexism impacting our students in ways not previously possible and how should student affairs professionals respond?

Page 6: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Online Discrimination & Harassment: The Issue

Online harassment is defined as repeat messages that threatened, insulted, or harassed.

Considering this definition, Finn (2004) “found 10% to 15% of students reported having experienced online harassment either from strangers, an acquaintance, or significant other” (p. 474).

Page 7: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Discrimination on Social Networking Sites

Page 8: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Defining FacebookFacebook is a social utility that connects people with friends and others who work, study and live around them. Students use Facebook to keep up with friends, upload an unlimited number of photos, share links and videos, and learn more about the people they meet.

From:http://blog.softtechvc.com/2005/10/the_facebook_un.html

Page 9: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Racism on Social Networks

Facebook users can create social groups to support and promote a common interest, memorial or tribute, social cause, or viewpoint. This

common interest group is an example of xenophobia (or a fear of foreigners or strangers) and oppression against individuals in America

who do not speak English.

Page 10: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Sexism on Social Networks

These featured groups portray negative stereotypes and prejudices of women.

Page 11: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Heterosexism on Social Networks

While groups can be discriminatory…

it’s important to acknowledge groups can serve as positive support systems too.

Page 12: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

The Issue:Racism on Social NetworksA group of white Louisiana college students decided to dress in blackface and reenact the Jena 6 assault. They posted a video clip and photos on a Facebook album called, “The Jena 6 on the River” (Adams, 2007).

The video clip can still be seen on this web site: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/1002071jena1.html

Page 13: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

The Issue: Homophobia & Heterosexism

For those who identify as a sexual minority, e-mail harassment is more prevalent—Approximately 1/3 of survey participants “who identified as GLBT reported getting repeated e-mail from someone they did not know, or barely knew, that threatened, insulted, or harassed them” (Finn, 2004, p. 475)

Page 14: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

The Issue: Homophobia & HeterosexismAccess to information on the internet has greatly

increased electronic resources for queer studentswww.hrc.orgwww.pflag.orgwww.tolerance.org

Conversely it provides easy access to discriminatory material and groupswww.godhatesfags.com

Page 15: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

The Issue: Sexism“Gender and harassment and invasions of women’s on-line privacy by men has, in some cases, gone beyond macho posturing and sexist language to rating the looks of women who post photos on their homepages…” (Machanic, 1998, p. 1).

Page 16: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

“If women, gays, ethnic minorities, or others perceived as ‘different’ do not feel safe, they will not interact fully in the on-line classroom, and less learning will occur, not only for those

who do not feel safe, but for those who are deprived of hearing the different perspectives

of those who are silenced” (Machanic, 1998, p. 4).

Page 17: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Online Discrimination & Harassment: The SignificanceChilly Campus ClimateAn essential factor that influences learning and the

eventual outcomes of a student’s learning experience is the campus environment (Hamrick, Evans, & Schuh, 2002)

When individuals use social networks and display a form of harassment, there is a lack of respect, powerlessness, bias, and/or discrimination towards others that create a chilly climate. This results in students feeling unsafe and not welcomed in these environments

Page 18: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Online Discrimination & Harassment: The SignificanceHow will racism, heterosexism, homophobia, and sexism effect various

Student Affairs Departments?

Residence Life: Racism and homophobia extend to Housing Placements. Students may want to switch rooms before they even meet their roommate(s) based on identifiers and pictures that can be found online

Judicial Affairs: Racist, sexist, and homophobic slurs and threats are committed online from/towards students on campus

Student Activities: Student Clubs and Organizations may have inappropriate and offensive material on their web sites that they are affiliated with

Page 19: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Online Discrimination & Harassment: The Role of Student AffairsFostering Student Learning

There are students who say that they create groups and/or post items on their Facebook account, intending them to be innocuous jokes (Weintraub, 2006).

Jokes are a form of harassment and can offend others, not only those who are targeted.

We need to educate students about INTENT vs. IMPACT and help them to reflect and become critical thinkers.

Page 20: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Online Discrimination & Harassment: The Role of Student AffairsColleges should consider developing materials

and a protocol that includes information about e-mail etiquette and online harassment.

“Preparation, education and consensus about proper behavior in cyberspace can provide a structure for coming together in the online learning environment in a way that preserves both individual rights and personal safety” (Machanic, 1998, p. 3).

Institutional policies should be developed to treat virtual harassment as real offenses.

Page 21: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

“Students with disabilities encounter stereotypes and prejudices that are similar to

those faced by individuals from other underrepresented groups”

(Junco & Salter, 2004, p. 264).

Page 22: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Disability Services & Technologies: The IssueThere are new technologies that may potentially

increase the number and effectiveness of services offered by offices of Disability ServicesPodcasts (recorded lectures, literature in audio format)Voice recognition softwareEquipped classrooms

Many students are entering our institutions proficient in the use of technology and often embrace its inclusion in services

Page 23: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Disability Services & Technologies: The SignificanceStudents with learning disabilities are entering

higher education at increased rates“Students with disabilities are less likely to complete

their degrees than students without disabilities” (as cited in Junco & Salter, 2004, p. 264).

Page 24: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Disability Services & Technologies: The Role of Student AffairsTake advantage of available technologies

Podcasting, online assessments, etc.Assess student wants and needs

Read (2007) points out that if students aren’t interested in using a given technology it isn’t a productive use of institutional resources

Page 25: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

“Psychiatric disorders comprise the fastest growing category of disability among college

students as evidenced by the increasing numbers of students seeking mental health

services on campuses” (as cited in Belch & Marshak, 2006, p. 465).

Page 26: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Mental Health in Relation to Online Use: The Issue

Page 27: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Mental Health in Relation to Online Use: The Issue “The Internet is a source of coping to escape from

problems of stressors…However, research also suggests that stressful interactions with the Internet itself may negate the benefits of social support received online, regardless of the quality of the online interactions” (as cited in Gemmill & Peterson, 2006, p. 282).

“Treuer and Belote (1997) discuss the concept of ‘cocooning’ where students may retreat to their computers and isolate themselves from campus activities. Another concern addresses the impact of face-to-face communication verses virtual communication” (Lloyd, Dean, & Cooper, 2007, p. 484).

Page 28: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Mental Health in Relation to Online Use: The Significance

“Chickering and Reisser (1993) provide a psychosocial development model through which college students progress in developing an identity. One of the key components includes developing interpersonal relationships with peers. Technology provides and opportunity for students to stay constantly connected with one another, but how the technology impacts peer relationship has not been fully examined” (Lloyd, Dean, & Cooper, 2007, p. 485).

Page 29: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Mental Health in Relation to Online Use: The Role of Student Affairs “Stress is a key issue affecting college students, and

student affairs professionals need to be aware of the potential relationship between disruptions from technology and perceived stress” (Gemmill & Peterson, 2006, p. 294).

“As the Internet becomes a more integral component of college life, student affairs professionals may need to expend greater effort alerting students and faculty to the potential difficulties that may arise from significant Internet overuse, including personal difficulties and interference with school-related work and assignments” (Fortson, Scotti, Chen, Malone, Del Ben, 2007, p. 142).

Page 30: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Non-Traditional Students: The IssueDefinition

Students who are generally 25 years old or order and had interrupted formal education either before or after finishing secondary school

Also includes later than usual initial enrollment, financial independence, full-time employment, part-time attendance, responsibility for dependents other than a spouse, being a single parent, and high school equivalency by means other than a diploma.

The National Center for Education Statistics described nearly three-quarters of beginning undergraduates as at least minimally non-traditional.

From: http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2298/Nontraditional-Students-in-Higher-Education.html

Page 31: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Non-Traditional Students: The IssueVirtual Classrooms and Distance EducationNon-traditional students bring important life experiences that

enhance in and out of classroom experiences, however “Many of these folks [non-traditional students] have kids, work irregular hours, or travel, which makes night school impossible” (Foster, 2004, p.104). Therefore distance education is often an attractive option

Distance Education: A field of education that focuses on the pedagogy, technology, and instructional systems design that aim to deliver education to students who are not physically "on site”

Colleges across the country are in a race to develop "online classes" where instruction is delivered across the Internet instead of the classroom. (Dadahboy, 2001).

Definition for Distance Education from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance_education

Page 32: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Non-Traditional Students: The SignificanceThere is a disconnect with online learning when there is

not personal interaction. “Computer mediated interaction does not contain valuable visual communication cues, in contrast to face-to-face interaction. The loss of these cues can lead to misunderstandings on many levels” (Barratt, 2001).

“Constructivist scholars argue vehemently that colleges and universities that venture forth into online education must be on guard against promoting technologies with packaged information that are devoid of reality, reflection, interaction, and decision making (Foster, 2004, p.109).

Page 33: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Non-Traditional Students: The Role of Student AffairsStudent Development Theory

• Human interaction such as interactions with faculty and peers affect “students’ cognitive and affective development” which are important outcomes of the educational experience (Hamrick, Evans, & Schuh, 2002).

Can professionals within Higher Education provide distance

learners the vibrant, in-depth assortment of a traditional on-campus learning experiences?

Page 34: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

User Compatibility: The Issue

Proficiency There is an increasing dependence on technology.

However, there is also the growing gap of interest in and understanding of technology between students and their professors (Langdon, 2004, p.144).

Unless we have staff and faculty that are proficient and trained in the use of new technologies the university’s forward growth is limited.

Students are also entering at different levels of proficiency given their level of access, based on age, socio-economic status, race, and education.

Page 35: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

User Compatibility: The Significance If faculty and staff are not proficient in the use of the

best technologies available, an institution may not be conducive to current students’ needs and expectations.

If technology to enhance and aid in learning is not provided, is the university really serving students in the best way possible?

If the university isn’t advancing around it’s technological offerings, it will be more difficult to recruit and retain a diverse student population.

Page 36: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

User Compatibility: The Role of Student Affairs Institutions must analyze what is being done to

provide access to technologies to a variety of students.

Institutions should offer trainings for students, faculty, and staff to maintain a campus population that utilizes available resources.

Technology is an expensive investment and sustainable financial planning is essential if significant advancement will be possible.

Page 37: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

Technology has radically changed how the college delivers it’s programs and

services to students. This has the ability to either help or hinder the

underrepresented students we serve.

Page 38: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

“As student affairs professionals work with students, it is important to understand

students’ use of technology and the purposes for which they use it…Despite the original intent of technologies such as Facebook,

iPods, and instant messaging, higher education professionals must consider how

they could utilize these technologies differently to help students succeed with their academic life, peer relationships, and healthy lifestyles”

(Lloyd, Dean, & Cooper, 2007, p. 492).

Page 39: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

ReferencesAdams, D. (2007). Facebook, america’s racist photo gallery. Retrieved Februrary 15, 2008 from,

http://laist.com/2007/10/04/facebook_americ.php.

Barrat, W. (2001). Models for evaluating student affairs web site. Retrieved February 15, 2008, from http://studentaffairs.com/ejournal/Spring_2001/will1.html

Belch, H. A. & Marshak, L. E. (2006). Critical incidents involving students with psychiatric disabilities: The gap between state of the art and campus practice. NASPA Journal, 43(3), 464-482.

Dadhaboy, Z. (2001). Distance learning and a well rounded education: A dichotomy? Retrieved February 15, 2008, from: http://studentaffairs.com/ejournal/Spring_2001/policy.html

The facebook unplugged at standford etl. (2005). Retrieved February 15, 2008, from: http://blog.softtechvc.com/2005/10/the_facebook_un.html

Finn, J. (2004). A survey on online harassment at a university campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(4), 468-483.

Fortson, B. L., Scotti, J. R., Chen, Y., Malone, J., & Del Ben, K. S. (2007). Internet use, abuse, and dependence among students at a Southeastern regional university. Journal of American College Health, 56(2), 137-144.

Foster, L. The impact of education innovation on student freedom: The case of distance education in higher education. In Ackerman, R., Werner, W., & Vaccaro, L (Eds.), Student Freedom Revisited: Contemporary issues and perspectives (pp. 103-113).

Gemmill, E., & Peterson, M. (2006). Technology use among college students: Implications for student affairs professionals. NASPA Journal, 43(2), 280-300.

Page 40: How Technology Impacts Underrepresented Students: A Student Affairs Perspective

McApple University

ReferencesHamrick,F, Evans, N, & Schuh, J. (2002). Foundations of student affairs practice: How

philosophy, theory, and research strengthen educational outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Junco, R., & Salter, D. (2004). Improving the campus climate for students with disabilities through the use of online training. NASPA Journal, 41(2), 263-276.

Langdon, E. Student governance and leadership. In Ackerman, R., Werner, W., & Vaccaro, L (Eds.), Student Freedom Revisited: Contemporary issues and perspectives (pp. 135-149). NASPA.

Lloyd, J. M., Dean, L. A., & Cooper, D. L. (2007). Students’ technology use and its effects on peer relationships, academic involvement, and healthy lifestyles. NASPA Journal, 44(3), 481-495.

Machanic, M. (1998). Gender and power issues in on-line learning environments. From 1st Int’l Conference on the Social Impacts of Technology, St. Louis, MO.

Nontraditional students in higher education- types of nontraditional students in the united states, support for nontradional leaders. Retrieved February 15, 2008, from http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2298/Nontraditional-Students-in-Higher-Education.html

Student in black face ‘jena 6’ renactment. Retrieved February 15, 2008, from http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/1002071jena1.html

Weintraub, E. (2006). Facebook groups are jokes, not ‘evil.’ Retrieved February 15, 2008, from http://media.www.dailytargum.com/media/storage/paper168/news/2006/03/22/Opinions/Facebook.Groups.Are.Jokes.Not.evil-1711724.shtml