23
BUILDING HIGH PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIPS WITH SUPPLIERS Douglas M. Lambert, Ph.D. Raymond E. Mason Chair in Transportation and Logistics Fisher College of Business The Ohio State University

How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

qsdfqsdf

Citation preview

Page 1: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

BUILDING HIGH PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIPS WITH SUPPLIERS

Douglas M. Lambert, Ph.D.Raymond E. Mason Chair in Transportation and Logistics

Fisher College of BusinessThe Ohio State University

Page 2: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Supply Chain ManagementSupply Chain Management

…is the integration of key business processes

from end user through original suppliers, that

provides products, services, and information

that add value for customers and

other stakeholders.

[The International Center for Competitive Excellence, 1994][The Global Supply Chain Forum, 1998]

Page 3: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Supp

ly C

hain

Man

agem

ent P

roce

sses

Tier 1Supplier

Tier 2Supplier Logistics

Purchasing Marketing & Sales

R&D

Customer Consumer/End-user

PRODUCT FLOWProduction Finance

Manufacturer

Information Flow

RETURNS MANAGEMENT

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION

SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT

MANUFACTURING FLOW MANAGEMENT

ORDER FULFILLMENT

DEMAND MANAGEMENT

CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGEMENT

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENTIntegrating and Managing Business Processes Across the Supply Chain

Source: Adapted from Douglas M. Lambert, Martha C. Cooper, and Janus D. Pagh, “Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9, No. 2 (1998), p. 2.

Page 4: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

n

2

3

1

2

1

1

n

2

1

3

n

2

1

3 1

n

2

n

1

2

n

1

Con

sum

ers/

End-

user

s

n

Tier

3 to

n s

uppl

iers

Initi

al S

uppl

iers

Tier 1Customers

Tier 2Customers

Tier 3 toConsumers/End-users

Tier 2Suppliers

Tier 1Suppliers

Tier 3 toInitial

suppliers

n

1

n

1

n

Members of the Focal Company’s Supply Chain

Focal Company

Non-members of the Focal Company’s Supply Chain

Managed Process Links

Not-Managed Process Links

Non-Member Process Links

Monitored Process Links

Types of Inter-company Business Process Links

Tier

3 to

n c

usto

mer

s

1

n

Source: Adapted from Douglas M. Lambert, Martha C. Cooper, and Janus D. Pagh, “Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1998, p. 7.

Page 5: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Sales Marketing Production

FUNCTIONAL INVOLVEMENT IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PROCESSES

Information Architecture, Data Base Strategy, Information Visibility

Research &Developmen

t

Logistics Purchasing FinanceBusinessProcesses

DemandManagement Forecasting

Manufacturing Capabilities

Sourcing Capabilities

Competitors’Initiatives

Customer Relationship Management

LogisticsCapabilities

ManufacturingCapabilities

SourcingCapabilities

CustomerProfitability

AccountManagement

RequirementsDefinition

Customer ServiceManagement

Alignment of LogisticsActivities

CoordinatedExecution

Prioritization of Customer

Knowledge of Customer

Operations

Manufacturing Flow Management

ProductionPlanning

IntegratedSupply

Order FulfillmentNetworkDesign Made-to-Order Material

ConstraintsDistribution

CostRole of Logistics

Service in Marketing Mix

Product Development and Commercialization

ProcessSpecifications

MaterialSpecifications R & D CostProduct

DesignLogistics

Requirements

PriorityAssessment

Cost-to-Serve

TradeoffAnalysis

ProcessRequirements

EnvironmentalRequirements

DifferentiationOpportunities from

ManufacturingCapabilities

PrioritizationCriteria

Supplier Relationship Management

IntegratedPlanning

SupplierCapabilities

Total DeliveredCost

MaterialSpecifications

Capabilities Requiredfor Competitive

PositioningInbound

Material Flow

ManufacturingCost

CU

STO

MER

S

SUPP

LIER

SBusiness

Functions

Returns Management

Note: Process sponsorship and ownership must be established to drive the attainment of the supply chain vision and eliminate the functional barriers that artificially separate the process flows.

Information Architecture, Data Base Strategy, Information Visibility

Knowledge ofMarketing Programs

Product Design

Reverse Logistics

Capabilities

Remanu-facturing

Material Specification

Revenue & Costs

Source: Adapted from Douglas M. Lambert, Larry C. Guinipero and Gary J. Ridenhower, “Supply Chain Management: A Key to Achieving Business Excellence in the 21st Century”, unpublished manuscript as reported in Keely L. Croxton, Sebastián J. García-Dastugue and Douglas M. Lambert, “The Supply Chain Management Processes”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 12, No.2 (2001), p. 31.

Technological Capabilities

Marketing Plan& Resources

Technical Service

Customer Knowledge

Customer Opportunities

Product/Service Gaps in Market

Sales GrowthOpportunities

Design for Manufacturability

Knowledge of Customer

Requirements

Knowledge of Customer

Requirements

CompetingPrograms in

Customer Space

Page 6: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Supp

ly C

hain

Man

agem

ent P

roce

sses

Tier 1Supplier

Tier 2Supplier Logistics

Purchasing Marketing & Sales

R&D

Customer Consumer/End-user

PRODUCT FLOWProduction Finance

Manufacturer

Information Flow

RETURNS MANAGEMENT

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION

SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT

MANUFACTURING FLOW MANAGEMENT

ORDER FULFILLMENT

DEMAND MANAGEMENT

CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGEMENT

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENTIntegrating and Managing Business Processes Across the Supply Chain

Source: Adapted from Douglas M. Lambert, Martha C. Cooper, and Janus D. Pagh, “Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9, No. 2 (1998), p. 2.

Page 7: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Supply Chain Performance = Increase in Profit for A, B, C, and D

ManufacturerC

Retailer/End User

A

Wholesaler/Distributor

B

P&L forC as supplier

P&L forB as supplier

∆ Revenue- ∆ Cost∆ Profit

∆ Revenue- ∆ Cost∆ Profit

SupplierD

P&L forA as customer

∆ Revenue- ∆ Cost∆ Profit

P&L forB as customer

∆ Revenue- ∆ Cost∆ Profit

P&L forC as customer

∆ Revenue- ∆ Cost∆ Profit

Total Cost Reportfor D as supplier

∆ Cost = ∆ Profit

Source: Adapted from: Douglas M. Lambert and Terrance L. Pohlen, “ Supply Chain Metrics”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 12, No. 1 (2001), p. 14.

CRM

SRMSRMSRM

CRMCRM

Customer Relationship Management (CRM) & Supplier Relationship Management (SRM): The Critical Supply Chain

Management Linkages

Page 8: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Supplier Relationship Management Process

Supplier Relationship Supplier Relationship Management ProcessManagement Process

Relationships with major suppliers are corporately managed as partnerships while purchase order transactions become simplified and integrated with the supply process.

Required Behaviors

Product/service agreements are developed and managed with key suppliers and segments of non-key suppliers.Teams work with suppliers to maintain costs and improve service.Goal is to improve the profitability of both the focus firm and the suppliers.Purchase order transactions are integrated with the supply process to improve productivity and all areas of supplier performance.

Page 9: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Supplier Relationship Management TeamsSupplier Relationship Management Teams

From

To

MISR&DMKTGLOGACCT

PurchasingMIS

R&DMKTG

LOGACCT

Sales

MISR&D

MKTGLOG

ACCT

Buyer Seller

MISR&DMKTGLOGACCT

Page 10: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Source: Keely L. Croxton, Sebastián J. García-Dastugue, Douglas M. Lambert, and Dale S. Rogers, “The Supply Chain Management Processes,”The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, (2001), p. 15.

Process Interfaces

Customer Relationship Management

Customer Service Management

Demand Management

Order Fulfillment

Manufacturing Flow Management

Product Development & Commercialization

Returns Management

Strategic Sub-Processes

Review Corporate, Marketing, Manufacturing and Sourcing

Strategies

Identify Criteriafor Categorizing Suppliers

Provide Guidelines for the Degree of Customization in the

Product/Service Agreement

Develop Framework of Metrics

Develop Guidelines for Sharing Process Improvement Benefits

with Suppliers

Operational Sub-Processes

Differentiate Suppliers

Prepare the Supplier/Segment Management Team

Internally Review the Supplier/Supplier Segment

Identify Opportunitieswith the Suppliers

Develop the Product/ServiceAgreement and

Communication Plan

Measure Performance and Generate Supplier

Cost/Profitability Reports

Implement the Product/Service Agreement

Supplier Relationship Management

Page 11: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Customer Relationship Management

Strategic Sub-ProcessesProcess Interfaces Activities

Customer Service Management

Demand Management

Order Fulfillment

Manufacturing Flow Management

Product Development & Commercialization

Returns Management

The Strategic Supplier Relationship Management Process

Review Corporate, Marketing, Manufacturing and Sourcing

Strategies

Identify Criteriafor Categorizing Suppliers

Provide Guidelines for the Degree of Customization in the

Product/Service Agreement

Develop Framework of Metrics

Develop Guidelines for Sharing Process Improvement Benefits

with Suppliers

Outline metrics of interestRelate metrics to the supplier’s impact on profitability and the profitability for the supplier

Identify product & service components that are key to the organization’s success now and in the future

Profitability / Growth / StabilityTechnologyCapacityInnovationQualityVolume purchasedCriticality / service level requiredSophistication / Compatibility

Consider quality/cost implications of various differentiation alternativesSelect boundaries for degree of differentiation

Outline options for sharing the benefits of process improvement

The Global Supply Chain Forum, The Ohio State University – Do not reproduce, cite or quote without written permission

Page 12: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Potential

Categorizing Packaging Suppliers at Masterfoods USA

- Under development- Intensive care- Temporary- Not in stable stage- Either a niche/core supplier

that the company can grow- Open relationship- Long term relationship- Large % of spend- Focus on our business

- Not a current supplier- Reasons for interest:

• Size• Technology• Innovation• Diversity

Unique offering

Niche

Core

Assessment

The Global Supply Chain Forum, The Ohio State University – Do not reproduce, cite or quote without written permission

Page 13: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Bottlenecks

Cooking Oil

Strategic

ChickenBeef

Promotional Sauces

Non-Critical

Straws

Leverage

CupsNapkins

Low Volume of Spend High

Low

Com

plex

ity fo

r Wen

dy’s

H

igh

Comparing Suppliers on Complexity and Volume

Source: Judy Hollis, Vice President, Wendy’s International

Page 14: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Improve product quality

Improved order fill rates

Improve manufacturing processes

Reduce cost of direct material

Improve plant productivity

Reduce purchased goods inventories

Reduce work in process inventories

Reduce finished goods inventories

Improve asset utilization and rationalization (warehousing & plant)

Improve investment planning and deployment

Increase productivity

Reduce freight and indirect labor/warehousing costs

Optimize physical network/facilities

Reduce order management costs

Reduce general overhead/management/administrative costs

Reduce information systems costs

Reduce human resources costs/improve effectiveness

Supplier Relationship Management’s Impact

%

Net Profit

Profit from Operations

Taxes

TotalExpenses

Gross Margin

Cost ofCapital

Inventory

TotalAssets

CurrentAssets

FixedAssets

OtherCurrent Assets

++

Sales

EconomicValueAdded

=

Cost of Goods Sold

Source: Adapted from Douglas M. Lambert, and Terrance L. Pohlen, “Supply Chain Metrics,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 12, No. 1 (2001), p. 11.

×

Capital Charge

How Supplier Relationship Affects Economic Value Added (EVA®)

Page 15: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Is costdependent onunit volume?

Isresource

dedicated to aspecificproduct

line?

Place incontribution

pool

ChargeApplicableSegment

ChargeApplicableSegment

Variable

Non-Variable

Indirect

NO

NO

YES

YES

Assigning Costs to SegmentsAssigning Costs to Segments

Page 16: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

SUPPLIER PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS:SUPPLIER PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS:A CONTRIBUTION APPROACH WITH CHARGE FOR ASSETS EMPLOYED

SUPPLIER A SUPPLIER B SUPPLIER C SUPPLIER D

COST OF GOODS SOLD

VARIABLE MARKETING & LOGISTICS COSTS:

ASSIGNABLE NONVARIBLE COSTS:SALARIESADVERTISING INVENTORY CARRYING COSTS LESS:

GROSS MARGIN

TRANSPORTATIONRECEIVINGORDER ROCESSING

SALES

PLUS: DISCOUNTS AND ALLOWANCESMARKET DEVELOPMENT FUNDSSLOTTING ALLOWANCESCO-OP ADVERTISING

NET MARGIN

Other Costs(will depend on situation)

CHARGE FOR ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

CONTRIBUTION MARGIN

SEGMENT CONTROLLABLE MARGIN

Other Costs(will depend on situation)

The Global Supply Chain Forum, The Ohio State University – Do not reproduce, cite or quote without written permission

Page 17: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

The Three Components of Total Costs

Warranty costsCustomer dissatisfaction costs

Environmental costsProduct liability costs

• Post-Ownership Costs

Risk costsConversion costsSupply chain/Supply network costs

Downtime costsCycle time costsNon-value-added costs

• Ownership Costs

Planning costsTaxes

Purchasing priceQuality costsFinancing costs

• Acquisition Costs

Page 18: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Sysco Sales and Earnings HistorySysco Sales and Earnings History

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

FY70

FY71

FY72

FY73

FY74

FY75

FY76

FY77

FY78

FY79

FY80

FY81

FY82

FY83

FY84

FY85

FY86

FY87

FY88

FY89

FY90

FY91

FY92

FY93

FY94

FY95

FY96

FY97

FY98

FY99

FY00

FY01

FY02

FY03

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

SalesNet Earnings

5 Yr. CAGR: Sales = 11.3% Net Earnings 19.1%

10 Yr. CAGR: Sales = 10.1% Net Earnings 14.5%

20 Yr. CAGR: Sales = 14.6% Net Earnings 16.0%

30 Yr. CAGR: Sales = 16.6% Net Earnings 18.1%

Sales(Billions)

Net Earn.(Millions)

* All net earnings data is before accounting changes.

FY03 Sales +11.9%; Net Earnings +14.5%

Source: Neil Theiss, Senior Director, Supply Chain Management, Sysco Corporation.

Page 19: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

CUSTOMER A

NET SALESCOST OF GOODS SOLD (VARIABLE MFG. COST)

MANUFACTURING CONTRIBUTION

VARIABLE MARKETING & LOGISTICS COSTS:SALES COMMISSIONSTRANSPORTATIONWAREHOUSING (HANDLING IN AND OUT)

ORDER PROCESSINGCHARGE FOR INVESTMENT IN ACCTS. REC.

CONTRIBUTION MARGIN

ASSIGNABLE NONVARIABLE COSTS:SALARIESSEGMENT RELATED ADVERTISINGSLOTTING ALLOWANCESINVENTORY CARRYING COSTS

SEGMENT CONTROLLABLE MARGIN

CHARGE FOR DEDICATED ASSETS USED NET SEGMENT MARGIN

SPECIAL PACKAGING

COST OF GOODS SOLD

VARIABLE MARKETING & LOGISTICS COSTS:

ASSIGNABLE NONVARIABLE COSTS:SALARIESADVERTISING INVENTORY CARRYING COSTS LESS:

GROSS MARGIN

TRANSPORTATIONRECEIVINGORDER ROCESSING

SALES

PLUS: DISCOUNTS AND ALLOWANCESMARKET DEVELOPMENT FUNDSSLOTTING ALLOWANCESCO-OP ADVERTISING

NET MARGIN

CHARGE FOR ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

CONTRIBUTION MARGIN

SEGMENT CONTROLLABLE MARGIN

SUPPLIER ASupplier Customer

CHARGE FOR DEDICATED ASSETS USED NET SEGMENT MARGIN

The Global Supply Chain Forum, The Ohio State University – Do not reproduce, cite or quote without written permission

COMBINED CUSTOMERCOMBINED CUSTOMER--SUPPLIER PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS:SUPPLIER PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS:A CONTRIBUTION APPROACH WITH CHARGE FOR ASSETS EMPLOYEDA CONTRIBUTION APPROACH WITH CHARGE FOR ASSETS EMPLOYED

Page 20: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

“ I ask my executives to run the business as if it is the only asset their family has, they can’t sell it, and they are going to own it for 100 years.”

Warren BuffettBerkshire Hathaway

Page 21: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

Customer Relationship Management

Operational Sub-ProcessesProcess Interfaces Activities

Customer Service Management

Demand Management

Order Fulfillment

Product Development & Commercialization

Returns Management

The Operational Supplier Relationship Management Process

Differentiate Suppliers

Prepare the Supplier/Segment Management Team

Internally Review the Supplier/Supplier Segment

Identify Opportunitieswith the Suppliers

Develop the Product/ServiceAgreement and

Communication Plan

Measure Performance and Generate Supplier

Cost/Profitability Reports

Implement the Product/Service Agreement

Manufacturing Flow Management

Perform supplier profitability analysis or total cost analysisAssess potential growth, strategic value and drivers

Identify Account/Commodity ManagerSelect team members

Product purchasedSales growthCriticality of supplier

Sales opportunitiesCost reduction opportunitiesService improvement opportunities

Develop and follow implementation planMeet regularly with key customers

Measure by supplier and for the supplierRevenue CostsProfitability Other: service, quality

Report performance

Outline and draft the PSAGain commitment of the company’s functions Gain supplier acceptance of PSA Agree on a communications and continuous improvement plan

The Global Supply Chain Forum, The Ohio State University – Do not reproduce, cite or quote without written permission

Page 22: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

2) What processes should belinked with each of these

key supply chain members?

1) Who are the key supplychain members with whom

to link processes?

3) What level of integration and management should be applied

for each process link?

Supply ChainManagementProcesses

Supply ChainNetworkStructure

Supply ChainManagementComponents

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: Elements and Key DecisionsSUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: Elements and Key Decisions

Source: Douglas M. Lambert, Martha C. Cooper, and Janus D. Pagh, “Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1998, p. 4.

Page 23: How Supplier Relationships Affect Ev At

THANK YOUTHANK YOU

DO YOU HAVE ANYDO YOU HAVE ANYQUESTIONS??QUESTIONS??