Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
How should we cope with
the energy challenges?
June 10, 2016
Eiichi HASEGAWA
Special Advisor to the Prime Minister
Agenda
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
0. To begin with
1. What has happened thereafter?
2. Parameters to be highlighted
3. Conclusions
1
To begin with
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
“Conclusions” from 2014
It is the case in a consumer country, particularly one with scarce indigenous natural resources, that once investments for energy efficiency are introduced, its energy saving effect will be long-lasting.
Also, we must be careful of high volumes of money awash globally, as this can make the oil market highly sensitive to an unexpected event. Efficient energy consumption structures help a consuming country to be more independent and immune from the unpredictable and fluid environment.
2
To begin with
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
“Conclusions and proposals” of 2015
Slowing down of development of new oil. Political turmoil in oil supplying countries. Increase of domestic oil consumption in oil supplying countries.
(1) Possible decline of oil-supply
(2) Lessons from past oil cycles Sharp and protracted swings in oil prices do not last forever. The
current down cycle is already the longest peak-to-trough (more than three hundred days).
The opportunities and threats typically emerge quickly.
(3) Individual or corporate level Introduction of energy-conserving equipment Streamlining production line, minimizing inventory Relocating factories, minimizing transporting parts and semi-
complete products, and upgrading logistics
3
To begin with
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
“Conclusions and proposals” of 2015
(4) Societal level Re-engineering social structures, such as the introduction of a mass-
transport system Upgrading the electricity supply chain and minimizing disruption, to
say nothing of outages
(5) What could we gain? Reduction of the consumption of oil Reduction of wasted time Improvement of the quality of service Improvement of the macro-economic balance Reduction of the clout of oil-supplying countries
4
5
Agenda
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
0. To begin with
1. What has happened thereafter?
2. Parameters to be highlighted
3. Conclusions
1. What has happened thereafter?
(1) Supply-side
U.S. oil production has nearly doubled since 2008, and thus, its oil imports have dramatically reduced, which has had a significant impact on some countries in South America and Africa.
OPEC, since it was agreed upon in November of 2014, does not look to reach consensus.
Iran, with the fourth largest oil reserves, may step up production.
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
Quote: BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2014
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
20
00
20
02
20
04
20
06
20
08
20
10
20
12
20
14
World Oil Production
(million barrel per day)
( OPEC Production )
6
1. What has happened thereafter?
Oil price changeand its consequences New projects have been suspended
Source: Baker Hughes
Which countries have huge oil reserves ?
298
266
174
157
150
102
98
93
49
44
Venezuela
Saudi Arabia
Canada
Iran
Iraq
Kuwait
U.A.E
Russia
Libya
U.S.
Proven oil reserves
In billions of barrels
Source: The Wall Street Journal
(1) Supply-side
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
Max. 1,609(Oct. 10, 2014)
Min. 316(May 27, 2016)
Active Oil Rigs in US
7
1. What has happened thereafter?
(4) What happened to the oil price?
Dramatically declined since the fall of 2014, and has slightly rebounded recently.
Brent price was $50 /barrel on June 1, 2016, while its peak had been $114 /barrel in 2014.
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$/barrel International Oil Price
WTI
Brent
8
1. What has happened thereafter?
Oil Demand Oil-demand growth forecast for major consuming countries
Source:IEA, Medium-Term Oil Market Report
(2) Demand-side
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
Source: “Oil-Flow Shift Poses Price Threat,” The Wall Street Journal February 11, 2016
Note: * Projection
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
10 15 10 15 10 15
IEA medium-term oil demand growth forecasts, by year of report
Middle East
BRIC
million barrels a day
U.S.
9
1. What has happened thereafter?
(3) Oil-related industries
M & AAn example is Royal Dutch Shell PLC’s purchasing of BG Group PLC.
Due to the recent plummeting oil price, the asset value of oil-related companies has generally decreased, thus making the purchase of their stocks less costly.
Source: The Wall Street Journal(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
$70.0billion
82.0
25.0
52.0
25.5
38.0
18.3
Royal Dutch Shell
Exxon
BP
Chevron
BG(2015)
Duvernay Oil(‘08)
Celtic Exploration(‘13)
Enterprise Oil(‘02)
Amoco(‘98)
Atlantic Richfield(‘00)
Burmah Castrol(‘00)
Texaco(‘01)
Unocal(‘05)
Atlas Energy(‘11)
Mobil(‘99)
XTO Energy(‘10)
5.4
5.0
3.1
4.7
4.5
Net Income as of 2015Shell $ 1,939 mil.BG $ 1,697 mil.
Net Income as of 1998Exxon $ 6,370 mil.Mobil $ 1,704 mil.
Net Income as of 1997BP $ 4,051 mil.Amoco $ 2,720 mil.
Net Income as of 1999BP $ 2,070 mil.Amoco $ 1,177 mil.
10
1. What has happened thereafter?
(3) Oil-related industries
Petrostates need to sell oil at a certain price in order to balance their budgets.
Based on current crude prices many could be facing deficits this year.
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
Source: “Oil’s Long Plunge Upends Global Order,” The Wall Street Journal, January 20, 2016, modified.
Note: Brent price. Projections for 2016
$49.72 barrelJun. 1
11
12
Agenda
0. To begin with
1. What has happened thereafter?
2. Parameters to be highlighted
3. Conclusions
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
2. Parameters to be highlighted
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
(1) G7 Ise-Shima Summit
Ensuring swift and successful implementation of the Paris Agreement including the long-term aims on mitigation, adaptation, and finance
Investment in supporting innovation in energy technologies and encouraging clean energy and energy efficiency. Energy investments, in particular, investments in quality energy infrastructure and upstream development
Is the low price of energy helpful to G7 countries, the majority of which are net energy importing countries, or not?
13
2. Parameters to be highlighted
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
(2) COP 21
Commitment to reducing global warming gas emission by not only developed countries but also large developing countries such as China
Energy conservation, and not only de-carbonization, but also innovating the social energy consuming structure
--- Increasing renewable energy, natural gas, and safe nuclear energy
14
2. Parameters to be highlighted
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
(3)Dynamics within OPEC member countries
New policy initiative of Saudi Arabia---reducing dependence on oil
To what extent will Iran accommodate other member countries ?
Some financially strapped countries
15
2. Parameters to be highlighted
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
(4) To be noted in some countries China
Reform Initiative vs. Slowing growth pace - Excess producing capacity such as steel- Surplus power generating capacity- Highly polluted atmosphere- Continuous demand in growth of transport
IndiaBrisk growth of economy
- Highly polluted atmosphere- Accelerated construction of roads- Continuous demand in growth of transport
Unanticipated production disruptionsSuch as militant attacks in Nigeria, wildfires in Canada, and political
unrest in Libya16
17
Agenda
0. To begin with
1. What has happened thereafter?
2. Parameters to be highlighted
3. Conclusions
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
3. Conclusions
(2) Diversifying energy sources
Infrastructure
Innovation
Note 1 : Energy consumption per GDP
(1) Raising energy efficiency
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa 18
3. Conclusions
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
Sufficient electricity for critical usage such as medical care, financial and other IT networks, and public utilities (supply of water and etc.)
(3) Securing redundant supplies in some cases
(4) Predicting mid-and long-term scenarios
together with scenario B
19
1.626
1.721
1.812 1.753
1.802 1.849
1.984 1.914
1.606
1.456
1.692 1.670
1.428
1.185
1.336
1.080
901 823
776 708 677
621 584 570 551
513 455
376 300 281 253
218 201 191
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Turkey
China
Saudi Arabia
UAE
United State
Japan
3. Conclusions
Energy consumption per GDP has generally improved. There is a significant gap in the pace of improvement among
countries.
Note 1 : Energy consumption per GDP
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
279 275
324
355 372
341 324 320
311
268
198 200 196 186
246
209 211 208 198
206 217
266
246
200
161
136 137 118
102 119
106 105 111 105
455
376
300 281
253
218 201
191 213
188 201
187 186 174
119 101
88 91 96 85 79
70 65 62 71 78 84 77 72
81 86 79 74 75 79 78 65 62 58 53 52
63
0
100
200
300
400
500
Turkey China Saudi Arabia
UAE United State JapanEnergy Consumption per Unit GDP
Source: IEA “Energy balances of OECD/NONE-OECD countries” (Consumption), IMF (GDP)
tonnse of oil equivalent (toe)/ million dollars of GDP
20
3. Conclusions
Regardless of the oil-price trend, oil consumption in non-OECD countries keeps rising.
Note 2 : Forecast in Oil Demand
(c) 2016, Eiichi Hasegawa
Source: “Outlook Dims for Global Oil Use,” The Wall Street Journal, October 22, 2015
Note: Historical demand estimated, and forecast.
21