Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IGCSE CambridgeInternational Relations since 1919
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Name: __________________________________________________ Form: _______
Core Content: Option B
Background
Japanese ruled Korea from 1910 - 1945.
After WWII Japan had lost and left Korea, with the Russian army in the North and USA army in the South.
Country divided along 38th parallel.
In the North - communists ruled with Kim Il Sung as leader.
In the South - elections were held & anti-communist Syngman Rhee was leader.
Both sides claimed to be the rulers of all Korea.
Sometimes there was fighting (clashes) on the border between North & South.
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Korea 1950-53
Why was the USA involved?
Before 1950 USA was not very interested in Korea.
BUT in 1950:USA policy of Containment: stop communism
USA ideas in NSC 68 which said USA needed more arms & it should ‘roll back’ communism.
USA believed in Domino Theory. If South Korea were to become communist it would spread to other countries for example Japan.
Why was the USSR involved?
Before 1950 USSR was not very interested in Korea.
BUT in 1949:NATO was formed and Stalin was worried, plus USA was helping Japan.Stalin thought USA was being ‘aggressive’
When Kim Il Sung leader of North Korea told Stalin he wanted to invade the South, Stalin thought it a good idea as it would cause the USA problems
USSR gave North Korea weapons and advice, but never sent Russian soldiers
V
Korean War
Impact of the Korean War
. made the Cold War worse
. spread the Cold War from Europe to Asia
. SEATO - South Asian Treaty Organization formed (similar to NATO)
. USSR set up the Warsaw Pact
. Korea was ruined by the war, one in ten Koreans died
. USA thought the war was a success because South Korea did not become communist (Truman Doctrine)
. United Nations showed it could be strong
5.1
5
5.2 5.3
5.4
Who was to blame for the Cold War?How did the USA react to Soviet expansion?
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Korea 1950-53
Phas
e O
ne: J
une
- Sep
t 195
0
Phas
e Tw
o: S
ept -
Nov
195
0
Phas
e Fo
ur: F
eb –
Mar
ch 1
951
Phas
e Th
ree:
Nov
195
0 - F
eb 1
951
On 25 June 1950, the North Koreans attacked. They were very successful. The North Korean People's Army (NKPA) easily defeated the Republic of Korea's army (the ROKs). They captured most of South Korea. The USA was shocked and alarmed.On 27 June they persuaded the United Nations to pass a resolution supporting South Korea. The USA sent troops to Korea as part of the UN force to help the South Korean Army at Pusan.
The Americans landed more troops. They used bombers. The Chinese admitted to losing 390,000 men dead - UN sources put the figure at up to a million Chinese and half a million North Koreans dead.The US drove the Chinese back, but 54,000 American soldiers died doing so. MacArthur reached the 38th parallel in March 1951.
He threatened to invade China.
Now the Chinese were alarmed. On 25 November, 200,000 Chinese troops ('People's Volunteers') attacked MacArthur. They had modern weapons supplied by Russia, and a fanatical hatred of the Americans. Then, on 31 December, half a million more Chinese troops entered the war and attacked the Americans. They drove the Americans back (using 'human wave tactics'). They recaptured North Korea, and advanced into South Korea.
On 15 September, the US General MacArthur led a UN amphibious landing at Inchon (near Seoul) behind the NKPA . Out of the 300,000 UN troops, 260,000 were Americans. In danger of being cut off, the NKPA had to retreat. The Americans drove them back and recaptured South Korea. 125,000 NKPA prisoners were taken. On 7 October 1950 MacArthur invaded North Korea. He advanced as far as the Chinese border. He boasted that the Americans would be 'home by Christmas'.
Phase Five: March 1951 – 1953Truman told MacArthur to stop. MacArthur was sacked when he publicly criticised Truman’s order. In 1953, Eisenhower became American president. The Americans threatened to use the atomic bomb if China did not stop fighting. The Chinese & Koreans agreed to a truce, which was signed on 27 July 1953. It is estimated that 10 million people died in the war - as many as died in the First World War.
Korean War: events 55.5 5.6 5.7 5.8
5.9
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Korea 1950-53
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
Cuban Missile CrisisBackground
Before 1959Dictator Batista was the ruler but was unpopular with many Cubans. Many USA businesses benefitted under Batista including sugar plantations & casinos. Cuba leased Guantanamo Bay to the USA.Fidel Castro wanted to improve the lives of the peasants & end corruption.
USA was opposed to Castro. He was friends with communists & was a threat to US business interests. Cuban Revolution 1959Castro seized power & appointed communists to his government.Castro turns to the USSR after USA opposed his rule.Many Cubans fled to the USA.Nationalisation: Castro seized much of the land & many companies
USA response:. refused to buy Cuban sugar. end all trade with Cuba. refused to supply arms. ended diplomatic relations. supported Cuban exiles in overthrowing Castro
USSR response: (after 1961). bought Cuban sugar. supplied Cuba with arms. offered support to Cuba
USA response: (to USSR). feared USSR supported the country on the USA's doorstep. USA warns USSR not to put nuclear missiles on Cuba
Bay of Pigs Operation
1961
Plan. President Eisenhower supported Cuban exiles in overthrowing Castro
. JFK continued with the plan, with the exiles invading Cuba with the support of the CIA
Invasion . CIA trained 1,400
exiles. invaded with support
of bombers flown by Cubans
. invasion easily stopped & 1,200 exiles
were captured by Castro's forces
Consequences. USA: JFK hugely embarrassed - seen as a bully
. Cuba: moved Castro closer to the USSR. USSR: supports Cuba, gains an ally (friend) in Central America
Soviet Missiles in Cuba
Why didKhrushchev put missiles
in Cuba?
Kennedy weakSome saw Kennedy as a
young inexperienced President who could be
pushed around. He was seen as being
weak after the unsuccessful Bay of
Pigs operation
Central America. Supporting Cuba was seen as important in establishing an ally (friend) in Central America & try to limit or stop US influence
Missiles in Turkey. US missiles in Turkey gave the US a strategic military advantage. Khrushchev hoped that his missiles in Cuba could be used to negotiate the removal of the Turkish missiles plus US position in Berlin
55.10
5.11
5.12
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Cuba 1959-62
Cambridge IGCSE History : International Relations since 1919
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledgeRead each statement and decide if it is TRUE or FALSETrue or False
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Cuba 1959-62
5a
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Korea 1950-53
www.resourcesforschools.com
Statement T
2 Cuba leased Guantanamo Bay to the USA.
3 USA supported Castro to take over in Cuba
F
4 Castro had friends who were communists
5 Everyone in Cuba was happy when Castro took over as leader
6 Castro introduced nationalisation
7 The USA remained trading partners with Cuba
8 The USA supported Cubans exiles in overthrowing Castro
9 The CIA trained 10,400 exiles to invade Cuba - Bay of Pigs
10 The exiles invasion was a disaster & JFK was embarrassed as a result
11 Cuba became friendlier with the USSR after the attempted exile invasion
12 Khrushchev wanted a friendly country in central America
13 Khrushchev thought JFK was weak & could be pushed around
14 USSR hoped to get the US missiles in Greece removed
15 The USA warned the USSR not to place missiles on Cuba
1 Batista was a Cuban leader
Core Content: Option B
Events 1962August: USA spy planes observe Soviet personnel & weapons in Cuba.
September:JFK warned the USSR that he would prevent them from putting missiles on Cuba 'by whatever means necessary’.
14 October: USA U2 spy plane takes photographs of the construction of nuclear missile launch site in Cuba.
USSR ships seen in the Atlantic Ocean heading to Cuba, with what looked like missiles on board.
16 October: was opposed to Castro. He was friends with communists & was a threat to US business interests. By 16 October it had become clear that the Cubans were allowing the USSR to assemble missile sites.
JFK was advised that the missiles could be ready to be fired before the end of October.
JFK had announced he would not allow the Soviets to place missiles on Cuba, but how could he get Khrushchev to remove them without risking a nuclear war?
Cuban Missile Crisis
Attack the missile sites by air to destroy the missile launch sitesBut no guarantee that all the sites would be hit & risk the Soviets striking back.
Do nothing and avoid a possible nuclear war with
the USSRBut make JFK
look weak & risk Soviet action
elsewhere e.g. Berlin.Invasion of Cuba
Destroy the missile sites & remove CastroBut invasion lead to killing Soviet personnel & likely result in war against USSR.
Choice: naval blockadeJFK announced all Soviet ships would be searched & those carrying missiles turned back. At the same time US armed forces were put on red alert & the USSR warned any missile launch would be met with full retaliation.
Kennedy’s Choices
Blockade of Cubanaval blockade of Cuba to stop missiles
arriving & give JFK time to negotiate But no guarantee that the Soviet
ships would stop & not necessarily get missiles removed from Cuba.
Nuclear deterrence was based on MAD:Mutually Assured Destruction.
Neither superpower would attack the other as retaliation from the other would mean both countries would be destroyed - potentially many times over.
However, missiles based in Cuba, could in theory mean the USSR could attack and destroy nuclear bases in the USA before they could retaliate.
Thus the USSR could win a nuclear war.
Situation: missiles close to the USA
55.13
5.14
5.15
5.16
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Cuba 1959-62
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
Cuban Missile Crisis - Kennedy’s ChoicesExplain the advantages & disadvantages for each of the choices that Kennedy faced5b
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Cuba 1959-62
test your knowledge
www.resourcesforschools.com
Kennedy’s Choice Advantages Disadvantages
Diplomacy
Attack missile sites from the air
Invasion of Cuba
Blockade of Cuba
Core Content: Option B
USA. Cuban Missile Crisis showed the need to look at all options and not always use the military one. Kennedy looked strong in the USA, making Khrushchev back down. Kennedy was respected around the world for avoiding war. A communist Cuba was still embarrassing. US missiles removed from Turkey
Cuba. Missiles removed
. Stayed Communist. Kept Soviet support
. Acted as a centre for communism in central America
Cuban Missile Crisis: events & consequences
Consequencesof the
Cuban MissileCrisis
USSR . Stopped US invasion of Cuba
. China criticised Soviets for backing down to USA
. Khrushchev seen as backing down to Kennedy
. Khrushchev removed from power two years later - partly due to CMC
Superpower Relations. Cold War thaw after CMC, as both leaders realised there was nearly a war. ‘Hot line’ established so leaders could talk directly to each other to avoid misunderstandings. Nuclear Test Ban Treaty was signed in 1963 helped improve relations
Khrushchev's response was to ignore the blockade & did not admit to having missiles on Cuba. It said it was merely helping Cuba defend itself & the USA was taking the world to war.
23 October
24 October
25 October
26 October
27 October
28 October
Soviet ships stop and turn around at the blockade line, except one carrying oil
Missile sites construction continued in Cuba
Khrushchev sent a letter saying that the USSR would remove the missiles if: USA stopped the blockade & USA promise not to invade Cuba in the future
Khrushchev second letter adds a demand that US missiles should be removed from Turkey. A U2 spy plane is shot down & JFK is pushed to retaliate. USA agree to first letter demands then JFK sends a secret message to Khrushchev agreeing to remove Turkey missiles.
Timeline of events
Removal of missiles from Cuba agreed by Khrushchev
1962
5
5.17
5.18
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Cuba 1959-62
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledgeAnswer: Question:
Cuban Revolution ___________________________________________________________
Answer: Question:
Agreed by Khrushchev ___________________________________________________________
Answer: Question:
‘Hot line’ ___________________________________________________________
Answer: Question:
Cuban missile sites ___________________________________________________________
Answer: Question:
Fidel Castro ___________________________________________________________
Answers & Questions:You have the answer, but what is the question?
Answer: Question:
Blockade of Cuba ___________________________________________________________
Answer: Question:
Batista ___________________________________________________________
Answer: Question:
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty ___________________________________________________________
Answer: Question:
US spy planes ___________________________________________________________
5c
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Cuba 1959-62
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledge
. Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence .
Decide for each statement if it is a:a. reason for Khrushchev to put missiles in Cubab. a choice for Kennedy to makec. an event of the Cuban Missile Crisisd. a consequence of the Cuban Misslie Crisis
Circle the correct answer
Do nothing and avoid a possible nuclear war with the USSR. But make JFK look weak & risk Soviet action
elsewhere e.g. Berlin.
. Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence .
Cuba stayed Communist.and continued to receive Soviet support.
. Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence . . Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence
Some saw Kennedy as a young inexperienced President who could be pushed around. He was seen as being weak after
the unsuccessful Bay of Pigs operation.
Destroy the missile sites & remove Castro,but an invasion lead to killing Soviet personnel & likely
result in war against USSR.
. Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence . . Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence .
‘Hot line’ established so leaders could talk directly to each other to avoid misunderstandings.
Naval blockade of Cuba to stop missiles arriving & give JFK time to negotiate, but no guarantee that the Soviet ships would stop & not necessarily get
missiles removed from Cuba
. Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence . . Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence .
. Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence . . Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence .
. Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence . . Kennedy . Khrushchev . Event . Consequence .
Khrushchev sent a letter outlining that the USSR would remove the missiles if: USA stopped the blockade & USA promise not
to invade Cuba in the future.
Khrushchev seen as backing down to Kennedy.Khrushchev removed from power two years later - partly
due to CMC.
US missiles in Turkey gave the US a strategic military advantage.Khrushchev hoped that his missiles in Cuba could be used to
negotiate the removal of the Turkish missiles.
Khrushchev's response was to ignore the blockade & did not admit to having missiles on Cuba. It said it was merely helping Cuba defend itself & the USA was taking the world to war.
Cuban Missile Crisis showed the need to explore the all options and not always go the direct military one.
Kennedy looked strong in the USA, making Khrushchev back down and was respected around the
world for avoiding war.
Events & consequences 5d
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Cuba 1959-62
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
Short Term(immediate)
Medium Term(soon after the event)
Long Term(over the next year or more)
Consequences of the Cuban Missile Crisis Place each consequence as a short, medium or long term consequence
Then rank each consequence according to its importance by highlighting each consequence:most important = RED important = BLUE least important = GREEN
5e
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Cuba 1959-62
test your knowledge
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
1. 1960 - 1963: Kennedy increased military advisors from 900 to 11,000
Steps to War for the USA
Vietnam War
Reasons why
the USAbecame
involved inVietnam
Truman DoctrinePolicy of containment said
USA to support anti-communists.
Presidents Eisenhower in the 1950s and Kennedy
after 1960 believed in the Domino Theory. If Vietnam
became communist then other countries would
follow: Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Burma , India etc
Background. French colony since C19th called Indochina.. Rebellion in 1930s crushed by the French army.. WWII, 1940 French surrender to Germans.. Japan (Germany’s allies) take over Vietnam from French.. WWII, anti-Japan resistance movement (Viet Minh) led by Ho Chi Minh, who wanted an end to colonial rule.. WWII, 1945 Allies victory meant France wanted Vietnam back, even though Ho Chi Minh had declared an independent Vietnam.. 1946 war broke out between Viet Minh & the French. Ho Chi Minh was a communist but kept quiet so not to upset USA.The USA was against colonialism.. 1949, Mao’s communist takeover in China meant support for the Viet Minh. 1950 USA now saw Ho Chi Minh as a communist enemy & friends with China. They gave $500 million pa to the French as part of their policy of containment.. French controlled the cities & the Viet Minh the countryside.. Viet Minh guerrilla tactics meant the French pulled out after defeat at Dien Bien Phu.. 1954 Peace Conference, Geneva Settlementsaw Vietnam divided into North & South (along 17th parallel) until elections were held which the USA did not want as they feared a communist victory.
Already involvedUSA had supported France since the end WWII.
Given $500 million per year to help France inc. equipment
After 1954, helped South Vietnam with money, equipment & military advisors.
USA counter the support that North Vietnam was getting from USSR & China.
Committed to supporting the South Vietnam government at Geneva Settlement. Backed unpopular leader Ngo Diem with $1.6 billion in 1950s.
. 1963: Vietcong take over 40% of S.Vietnamese countryside
Viet
cong
= S
outh
Viet
nam
ese
com
mun
ists
+ No
rth V
ietna
mes
e
. 1963: President Johnson sends more help to stop Vietcong Johnson not a ‘war monger’ but not want to be seen as soft on
communism Defence Sec. McNamara believed war was winnable
3. March 1965: US Marines arrive No longer called advisors but troops US bombers start bombing North Vietnam called ‘Rolling Thunder’
2. Aug. 1964: Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (still debate about circumstances of incident)
US ships attacked by North Vietnamese torpedo boats Johnson attacked North Vietnamese naval bases
4. After 1966: Total war Over 500,000 US soldiers in Vietnam on 12 month tours Draft of young men in the US army
5. 1968: Nixon elected President - withdraw from Vietnam Peace with honour - took 4 years
55.19 5.20
5.21
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledgeVietnam WarRank Reasons why USA became involved in the Vietnam & explanation of ranking
1
2
3
4
Mark
/10
Steps to war: how far did each ‘step’ take USA closer to war (mark out of 10)
Explain how it took the USA closer to war in Vietnam
1960 -63: Kennedy increased military advisors
1963: Johnson sent more help to South Vietnam & McNamara believed war was winnable
1964: Gulf of Tonkin resolution
1965: US marines arrive in South Vietnam & Rolling Thunder begins
5f
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Cuba 1959-62
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
BombingOperation Rolling Thunder(Feb. 1965 - 1972). Targets:. industrial & military targets initially approved by President. then town & cities. then in Laos & Cambodia Ho Chi Minh TrailResult:. reduced number of soldiers needed. dropped more bombs than on Germany & Japan in WWII. damaged NV ability to fight the war. attacked Vietcong targets in South. 14,000 US bombers shot down. failed to stop the communists
. Killing civilians (women & children) turned many in USA against the war
Vietnam War
Guerilla tactics. Less soldiers & outgunned byUS & South Viet forces. Ho Chi Minh used guerilla tactics like Mao in China. Attack & disappear into jungle. Retreat if out numbered. Not always wear uniforms. Got peasant support - sometimes through terrorResult:. Very motivated fighters. Lower morale of US soldiers. Had peasant support. Network of informants. Over 1 million died
Supply lines & tunnels. The Vietcong in the South were
supplied via trails in Laos & Cambodia
. USA failed to stop the flow of supplies, often carried on
bicycles, despite heavy bombing
. Underground bases & tunnels kept Vietcong safe from
bombingResult:
. Vietcong constantly supplied. Tunnel network destroyed
US morale
UStactics
inVietnam
Chemical WeaponsAgent Orange & Napalm
. It was a sort of ‘weedkiller’ . Used to destroy the jungles,
so the Vietcong had no hiding place
Result:. Destroyed thousands of
sq km of jungle. Burned & killed thousands
of guerrilla fighters & civilians
. Shocking pictures of women & children burned by
chemical weapons turned many people in the USA
against the war
Events
Vietcongtactics
Search & destroy. Bombing was not winning the war
. USA built strong bases in the south & launched attacks via helicopters
. Result:. Some successes against Vietcong
. Pointless attacks based on poor information. Vietcong often ‘vanished’ before attacks
. Many civilians killed during attacks. Turned many peasants against the USA/South Vietnamese. My Lai Massacre turned US public opinion against the war
Trail through Laos & Cambodia kept Vietcong supplied.Bombing of trail was very controversial as countries not involved in the war. Bombing did little to disrupt supply lines as 35,000 + Vietnamese kept it open.
Turning points:My Lai Massacre 1968 - 1969Charlie Company on search & destroy mission killed 300 - 400 villagers, mainly women, children & old men. No Vietcong were found. It was considered a success.One year later a letter was sent to politicians & Life magazine printed photos. An investigation ended in mass murder charges for Lt. Calley & others. Calley was blamed & got 20 years ‘hard labour’.USA people were shocked & protests increased.
Tet Offensive 1968On Tet religious holiday, Vietcong launched over 100 attacks across South Vietnam.Scale of offensive shocked USA.Vietcong suffered huge causalities, but USA morale badly affected.Americans thought the war was unwinnable.
General Giap (AP photo)
After a napalm attack
55.22 5.23
5.24
www.resourcesforschools.com
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
Core Content: Option B
Vietnam WarVietcong Success
/10Explanation
Guerilla Tactics
Supply Lines
Bombing
USA Success/10
Explanation
Search & Destroy
Chemical weapons
5g
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
Events in Cuba 1959-62
test your knowledge
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
Harsh lifestyleVietcong use to hard peasant lifestyleAt home in jungle environment & communal living
Why was the USA unable to win the Vietnam War?Military situation
US soldiers used to a comfortable lifeJoin up for different reasons: hero; patriotism;
learn to fly etcLife in Vietnam was harsh & uncomfortable
Many conscripts did not want to be there
Killing civiliansBombing & chemical weapons killed civilians & turned
Vietnamese against the USA
Tour of dutySoldiers were in Vietnam for 365 daysThe priority was to survive & go home,
rather than win the war
Disunity in the ArmyUS forces distrust South Vietnamese, as communists
had infiltrated the South Viet. army & government
High tech weaponsUp to 1964 US military advisors had
good relationsnip with VietnameseAfter 1965 US Marines very aggressive &
came to hate VietnameseAfter 1965 US relied on bombing inc. chemical
weapons which killed civiliansUS forces could not tell friend or enemy apart
because of Vietcong tactics
Reaction in USAAnti-war movement showed soldiers to be baby killers
Many soldiers were anti-war before they even went to Vietnam
Upon returning home not treated as heroesIn fact soldiers became anti-war protesters!
Attitude to
war
Guerilla warfareGuerilla warfare was central to VC tactics though Tet offensive showed it was capable of traditional warfare which shocked US generalsand US public alikeUS troops always scared of VC ambushes
SuppliesVC supplied through network of tunnels + Ho Chi Minh trails in Laos & CambodiaPeople repaired trials after US bombing
Serve their countryPatriotic soldiers fighting for their homelandAgainst colonial rule - French then USA
Win the hearts & mindsCommunits worked hard to win over the peasantsBUT treated peasants harshly if they did not support them
Support in Vietnam + China & RussiaFull support of Vietnamese people - working togetherUSSR & China supplied military hardware + advice
Communists U.S.A.
UnitySoldiers & Vietnamese people very motivated to defeat the ‘colonial invading’ army & worked togetherCommunists controlled & motivated in a variety of waysPeople made huge personal sacrifices inc. women & children to help the soldiers:‘Shock brigades’ repaired bomb damage after air raids
Drugs & R & RSoldiers were in Vietnam for 365 days
Priority was to survive & go home, rather than win the war
Many resorted to drugs to overcome the shock of war
Conflicts within the US armyOfficers often lacked experience & authority - soldiers mutinied
Over 100 officers were killed by their own men‘Grunts’ (infantrymen) were on average 19 years old, had low morale
& going on patrols was very unpopular with booby traps and ambushes common
Many army units experienced racial problems
InformationCommunists had informants in South Vietnam - in all areas inc.army, US Army and CIAThey often knew of planned attacks in advance
Military tactics
Support
5
5.26
5.27
5.28
www.resourcesforschools.com
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
5.25
Quality of
soldiers
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledgeUSA
orCommunists
Statement
At home in the jungle environment & with communal living
Priority was to survive & go home
Supported & supplied by the USSR & China
Motivated to defeat the ‘invading colonial armies’
‘Grunts’ were on average 19 years old
After 1965 they relied on bombing & the use of chemical weapons
Had informants in the South Vietnamese govt., US army & CIA
“Shock brigades’ repaired bomb damage after air raids
Soldiers were in Vietnam for 365 day tour of duty
Supplied through a network of tunnels & trails through laos & Cambodia
Patriotic soldiers fighting for their homeland
Worked hard to win the ‘hearts & minds’ of the peasants
Often knew, in adavnce, of planned attacks
Found life in Vietnam harsh & uncomfortable
Many soldiers took drugs to overcome the shock & horror of war
Officers often lacked authority & there were mutinies
At home soldiers were often known as ‘child killers
Write in whether the statement applies to either the USA or communistsWhy was the USA unable to win the Vietnam War?5h
www.resourcesforschools.com
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
Core Content: Option B
Why was the USA unable to win a military victory in Vietnam?
Rank Strengths Explanation
1
2
Rank
1
2
Weakness Explanation
3 3
4 4
5 5
Communists strengths
Rank with an explanation the military strengths of the North Vietnamese communistsand the military weaknesses of the USA
5i
USA weaknesses
www.resourcesforschools.com
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
Core Content: Option B
Why was the USA unable to win the Vietnam War? Situation in the USA
Divided US societyUSA torn apart by the war - totally divided
Civil unrest - some feared civil war
President Johnson’s aimsPublic aim: defeat communism (containment)
support democracy (S.Vietnam)
Private aims: save face for USA not be first President to lose a war
BUT: many in US not care about democracy in VietnamUS supporting a corrupt S. Vietnam government
President Johnson’s methodsPolitical: Support democracy but alien to Vietnamese
Support educational, medical & social programmes
Military: Use bombing to win the warDestroy VC supply routes
BUT: bombing made Vietnamese more determinedChemical attacks turned US people against the war
Loss of McNamara 1967McNamara (Defence Sec.) with JFK then JohnsonMcNamara responsible for military policy & tacticsMcNamara changed from saying easily winnable,
to the war being unwinnableReplaced by Clark (advisor & friend of Johnson)
Tet OffensiveNorth Vietnamese VC attacked multiple targets in the SouthAttacked during Tet holiday surprising everyoneAttacks were unsuccessful & the VC lost 60,000 soldiers
BUT: US shocked by size of attack, confidence shakenUS intelligence failed & 10,000 US/South troops killedPeople in USA shocked by what their sawUS media showed it as a failure for the USA
President JohnsonJohnson’s health suffered
Advisors started looking at peace optionsBombing stopped whilst peace talks held
BUT: Peace difficult as North Vietnamese not want to compromise
Johnson in a weak negotiating position
Problems in South Vietnam 1966 - 67Government was corrupt & unpopular
Many South Vietnamese supported Ho Chi Minh
1966 1967
1968
Defence Secretary ClarkRealised USA did not have a plan to win in Vietnam
(policy of not losing to save face)By March 1968 Clark was telling President Johnson the
war was unwinnable
Public opinionStudents protests e.g. teach-ins - against conscription
Anti-war debates & demonstrations
Public opinionMembers of Congress start criticising Johnson’s policiesBuddhist nun sets herself on fire in protest in VietnamMartin Luther King & other church leaders join anti-war protestsTax increases to pay for war, leads to more demonstrationsMedia turn against the war
Financial costsGreat Society spending cut as military spending increasedDeficit: from $1.6 billion (1963) to $25.3 billion (1968)Inflation increased + people not want to pay increase in tax to pay for war
1965
5
5.29
5.30
5.31
www.resourcesforschools.com
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
Public opinionTV coverage: bombing & chemical attacks turned people against warMai Lai incident shocked people around the worldOpinion: win the war or get out
Core Content: Option B
Negotiations: ‘Peace with Honour’May 1968: USA wanted a South Vietnam, the communists wanted a united Vietnam. USA wanted free elections in the south but North Vietnamdid not trust the elections would be fair.Kissinger (USA) & Le Duc Tho (North Vietnam) agreed:. US troops withdraw after ceasefire. Prisoners of war released. Elections in the south Paris Peace Agreement - 27 January 1972
The My Lai Massacre 1968 - 1970Event: Unit of soldiers (Charlie Company) on a ‘search & destroy mission’. Attacked what they thought was a Vietcong stronghold.After 3 / 4 hours 300-400 civilians were dead inc. women & children.There were no Vietcong & only 3 weapons found.Official report: only 20 civilians killed, the rest were Vietcong.The soldiers were praised for their actions.
The letter: Soldier Ridenhour who knew many soldiers at My Lai wrote a letter to politicians & officials in Washington saying what really happened there.Life Magazine: published photos of the massacre.Investigation: Lieutenant Calley was charged with murder and others were also charged, but the army made Calley solely responsible & said he was not acting on orders. Calley was sentenced to 20 years hard labour. (He was released after 3 years).The events of My Lai shocked the US people.
The Peace MovementPeace movement: no longer hippies & students but ordinary
middle class people who wanted an end to the ‘pointless’ war.
My Lai Massacre: after the incident came to light over 500,000 people protested against in the war in
Washington DC. The largest protest ever in the USA.
Politics: to be pro-war was political suicide for most politicians. Nixon was very anti-communist
but had to be against the war or at least pro peace to get elected in 1968
The end of war in Vietnam
VietnamizationNixon started replacing US soldiers
with Vietnamese soldiers AVRN.Between 1969 - 71 400,000 troops were
withdrawn from Vietnam.AVRN were no match for communist fighters.US invasion of Cambodia
The US was unable to cut off the supply lines as the communists used trials & bases in Laos & Cambodia.Nixon ordered the invasion of Viet Cong bases in Cambodia
BombingNixon ordered bombing to be increased.He hoped this would put pressure on the communists as peace negotiations continued.When talks broke down in Dec 1972, Nixon ordered a massive bombing campaign.In 11 days more bombs were dropped than in the previous 2 years.
Nixon’s
strategy
USSR & China relations USSR & China relations in 1969 were so bad some feared there
would be a war between the two.
As a result both countries tried to improve their relations with the USA.
1970: Nixon & USSR began talks about limiting nuclear arms (SALT) & asked USSR to pressure North Vietnam
to end the war.1972: Nixon was invited to visit China & he asked China to pressure North Vietnam to end the war.
Loss of faith in the military leadershipRealisation that the USA could not win a military victory
after the Tet OffensivePeople lost faith in the US army
1969
The end …..Fighting restarted in 1973, AVRN held for a while but low morale & poor leadership meant that by ……April 1975, communist forces entered Saigon - hundreds of thousands of S. Vietnamese were executed.People watched on TV as 6000 Americans fled, helicopters lifting people off the Embassy roof.
55.32
5.33
www.resourcesforschools.com
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
Core Content: Option B
Nixon’sstrategy
The Vietnam War Match the event to the correct year
1965 19691966
1967 1968
North Vietnamese VC attacked multiple targets in the SouthAttacked during Tet holiday surprising everyone
Over 500,000 people protested against in th war in Washington DC. The largest peace protest ever in the USA.
Realisation that the USA could not win a military victoryafter the Tet Offensive and people lost faith in the US arm
McNamara changed from saying easily winnable, to the war being unwinnable
North Vietnamese VC attacked multiple targets in South Vietnam
Military spending increased to $25.3 billion
Nixon was very anti-communist, but had to be against the war or at least pro peace to get elected
Nixon started replacing US soldiers with Vietnamese soldiers AVRN.
The invasion of Viet Cong bases in Cambodia
In 11 days more bombs were dropped than in the previous 2 years
Johnson’s aims: defeat communism (containment) & support democracy (S.Vietnam)
Students start protests e.g. teach-ins - against conscription
Members of Congress start criticising Johnson’s policies
400,000 US troops were withdrawn from Vietnam
Peace movement: no longer hippies & students but ordinary middle class people who wanted an end to the ‘pointless’ war.
When talks broke down ordered a massive bombing campaign.
Both the USSR & China tried to improve their relations with the USA.
5j test your knowledge
www.resourcesforschools.com
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
Core Content: Option B
What were the turning points that contributed to the situation in the USA becoming increasingly anti-war?
Event Score out of
/10
Explanantion
Johnson’s aims
Johnson’s methods: bombing & chemical weapons
McNamara resigns:war unwinnable
Tet Offensive
Clark: there is no plan to win the war
My Lai massacre
Invasion of Cambodia & Laos
Nixon’s increase in bombing
Score each event out of 10, in terms of it being a turning point that influenced the American public into becoming more anti-war - explain your score.
5k test your knowledge
www.resourcesforschools.com
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
Core Content: Option B
Consequences of the Vietnam War
Vietnam
EnvironmentChemical warfare:
Huge areas of forest & agricultural land destroyed
Food shortages as a resultWater supply poisoned
Mines & unexploded bombs were everywhere and continued to kill people t=years after the war
SocietyMany peasants left the countryside & lived in shanty towns: poverty, prostitution & drugsRefugees = 5 millionCorruption in the South was rifeBlack market in US goods
PoliticalVietnam unified under communism
Communism spread to Cambodia & LaosSouth Vietnamese victimised after the war,
thousands executed & ‘re-educated’
US foreign policy: end of containmentPropaganda disaster for the USAUse of bombing, chemical warfare lost US supportNixon ended the ‘Truman Doctrine’US abandoned policy of containmentMilitary intervention less likely after VietnamLooked to talk with USSR & China: Detente
EconomicMilitary industrial production increased, consumer goods decreasedUSA had budget deficits which caused inflationInterest rates roseValue of the dollar fellGovt. spending was reduced on social programmes in Johnson’s ‘Great Society’
USA
Society58,000 died in the war
Divided the nation:Student demonstrations
Draft dodgersMany veterans became anti-war protestors
drug addicts & suffered post traumatic stress (est. at 800,000)
Others who handled Agent Orange suffered cancerTV war: pictures of the horrors of war on the news
every eveningUSA lost confidence in their country
PoliticalPresident Johnson destroyed by the war - even
though vast majority supported the war at the start
Pro-war became political liabilityNixon anti-communist but had to pursue peace
Politicians more isolationist
EconomicUSA banned trade with VietnamFood shortages were common‘Boat people’: 1970s saw 1 million Vietnamese try to leave the countryTook 20 years to recover to pre-war levels
5
5.34
5.35
www.resourcesforschools.com
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledgeConsequences of the Vietnam War
5
4
3
2
1
2
3
4
5
Communists U.S.A.+
–
Vietnam unified under communism
Communism spread to Cambodia & Laos
South Vietnamese victimised after the war, thousands executed & ‘re-educated’
USA banned trade with Vietnam
Food shortages were common
Took 20 years to recover to pre-war levels
‘Boat people’: 1970s saw 1 million people try to leave the countryFood shortages were common
Many peasants left the countryside & lived in shanty towns: poverty, prostitution & drugs
Nixon ended the ‘Truman Doctrine’
Govt. spending was reduced on social programmes in Johnson’s ‘Great Society’
Many veterans became anti-war protestors drug addicts & suffered post traumatic stress
Interest rates rose and the value of the dollar fell
Looked to talk with USSR & China: Detente
US abandoned policy of containment
List the consequences for both sides as positive & negative on a scale of 1 - 5.
5 = very positive/negative
negative
positive
5l
www.resourcesforschools.com
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
How effectively did the USA stop the spread of communism?
US involvement in Vietnam
Cambridge IGCSE History : International Relations since 1919
www.resourcesforschools.com
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 - c.1989?
IGCSE CambridgeInternational Relations since 1919
Core Content: Option B
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Opposition to Soviet rule in Hungary 1956
Hungary 1956
Freedom of SpeechThe Hungarians were not able to speak
freely. The communist government controlled the newspapers, radio, arts ,
theatre and music.The Hungarians were scared of the secret
police - State Protection Group (AVO) - who arrested people for criticising the
government, or communism
or the Soviets.
PatriotismHungary had a long history& a rich culture.They disliked the fact that Russian soldiers were in their country and the Russian language was being used.
EducationChildren in schools were taught the communist version of history, ignoring much of Hungary's history, especially its empire & links with Austria & Germany.
Quality of lifeIn addition, to
censorship & the secret police, the Hungarians
standard of living declined as pay
decreased for many workers.
Food shortages were common under the
communists. Some of the best industrial
equipment was shipped to the Soviet Union.
ReligionThe communists were against religion which
upset Christians.The Catholic leader, Cardinal Minszenty,
was arrested & sent to prison.
The period after Stalin's death 'Peaceful Co-existence', under Khrushchev brought some changes to many communist countries in Eastern Europe. Many countries wanted to 'reform' some of the communist policies & systems.Hungary brought in a more reformist leader - Imre Nagy
Yugoslavia had gained some independence from the Soviet UnionPoland had seen demonstrations which had seen them gain more freedoms.
Reasons why
Hungarians opposed Soviet control
6.26.1
6
Cambridge IGCSE History : International Relations since 1919
Background
Hungary was established at the end of WWI, after the
collapse of the Austro-Hungarian empire.
At the end of WWII, the USSR's Red Army
occupied Hungary & continued to do so with a 'mutual assistance treaty'.
A coalition government was elected in 1945.
The Hungarian communist party got
17% of the vote.Over the next 4 years
Communists took over key positions & set up the
secret police, who intimidated, arrested
& imprisoned non communists.
People's Republic of Hungary (communist)
was declared in 1949, under the
leadership of Rakos.
Hungary had to pay $300 million in reparations
to the Soviet Union.
The Soviet system was quickly established e.g.:
collectivisation,nationalisation of industry
etc.
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
Hungary 1956
The West. Voice of AmericaUSA's radio station
'Voice of America' encouraged the uprising & suggested
the USA would help Hungary
. Suez CrisisMany Western countries were distracted by the Suez Crisis
. ProtestsPresident Eisenhower & other
leaders protested to Khrushchev
. United NationsThe Western countries tried to
get a resolution (Soviet troops to leave Hungary) but the USSR
vetoed it
USSR. Domino effectKhrushchev was worried that other communist countries would want more freedoms & independence if they let Hungary have reforms.
. ChinaChina advised Khrushchev to be strong with Hungary & not give in.
. Khrushchev's leadershipKhrushchev could not afford to look weak in the USSR & Eastern Europe.
. United NationsThe USSR used its veto to block action & stopped the UN Secretary General from visiting Hungary
Short termHungarians killed: 3,000 Red Army killed: 7-8,000200,000 Hungarians left the country Nagy arrested, sent to Moscow & shot.
Events:23 October
Demonstrations in Budapest including pulling down a
statue of Stalin.Demonstrators want
Emo Gero out & Imre Nagy in.
24 OctoberNagy becomes Prime
Minister with Khrushchev's approval.
27 October Nagy forms new government including non communists.Religious leader Cardinal
Minszenty freed from prison.
29 OctoberSoviet troops withdrawn after
battles with the Hungarian army & militia.
Nagy announces:. end of collectivisation
(farms to return to private ownership)
. end of one party rule. Hungary to be neutral
. withdrawal from Warsaw Pact
4 NovemberRed Army (200,000) + 2,500
tanks invades HungaryNagy appeals to President
Eisenhower for help
Janos Kadar becomes Prime Minister
Medium termNew leader Kadar crushed
further resistance: arrested 35,000 & killed 300+
Khrushchev established himself as Soviet leader & showed
he could be strong like Stalin if he
needed to be - giving a warning to other
communist countries
6.4
6.5
Responses to the
Hungarian uprising
Consequences of the
Hungarian uprising
6.36
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Opposition to Soviet rule in Hungary 1956
Long termMany Hungarians lost faith in the West - after their false promises & realised the
policy of 'containment' did not include Eastern European countries.United Nations proved to be ineffective against an agressor
East - West relations deteriorated.USA was unable to influence events in Eastern Europe but were more determined
to stop communist expansion elsewhere in the world.
www.resourcesforschools.comwww.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledgeHungary 1956
Rank Reason why Hungarians opposed Communist/Soviet control
Explanation
1
5
4
3
2
List the reasons why the Hungarians opposed Soviet control & explain why you gave it that ranking6a
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Opposition to Soviet rule in Hungary 1956
www.resourcesforschools.com
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Opposition to Soviet rule in Hungary 1956
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledge
C historystudent.co.uk
C historystudent.co.uk
Hungary 1956
1. The Hungarian secret police: ___________ _____________ Group
2. The Hungarians were proud of their country and its long history: _________________
3. The name given when the government controls newspapers, radio, TV etc ________________
4. Name of new Hungarian leader: ______ _____
5 Capital of Hungary: ________________
6. Name of religious leader: _______________
7. Leader of USSR in 1956: ________________
8. Name of leader appointed on 4th November : ___________
9. USSR blocked action in the United Nations by using its : ___________
10. Month when the demonstrations started in Hungary: ______________
11. Western Countries were distracted by the: ______ _______
12. Hungary withdrew from this organisation in October 1956: W ____________ P _______
13. USSR’s first satellite in space: S __________
S T A
T B K
A R A
T F D
E O A
P R R
R E B
T B X
E O V
C T R
I C E
M O S
T
H
D
E
F
T
E
V
E
O
R
C
E
R
G
A
G
C
M
E
Y
E
S
O
P
U
R
Y
N
A
R
T
O
W
U
P
R
S
A
T
B
P
C
O
I
G
E
A
O
H
E
N
C
W
Y
E
L
T
Z
C
T
C
T
E
V
A
U
R
B
S
C
T
E
H
Y
Z
N
S
O
U
M
E
R
S
C
E
N
S
O
R
S
H
I
P
I
U
T
V
L
N
K
A
P
S
M
A
S
N
I
A
I
I
L
W
A
T
R
D
I
A
O
F
H
M
L
O
C
I
E
U
S
G
N
T
R
E
Y
K
T
N
N
B
E
U
T
D
F
I
C
I
O
P
A
G
J
O
A
N
I
H
C
T
F
I
G
E
D
P
P
L
K
A
P
O
L
P
Y
T
R
E
WO
RD
SEA
RC
H
Answer the questions & find the word(s) in the wordsearch6b
C historystudent.co.uk
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Opposition to Soviet rule in Hungary 1956
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
1. Improve people’s standard of living(more consumer goods made)
2. More freedoms (let workers have more say, public discussions, free speech & media, political parties)
3. Federal Czechoslovakia(more power to the regions)
+keep links with the USSR
stay in the Warsaw Pact
The Red Army & Czech fighters defeated the Nazi German forces.
After WWII a coalition government was formed, including Communists who held key posts.
Communist policies of nationalisation were introduced for industry & banks, plus land reforms.
1946 elections:Communists 38%
PM Gottwald accepted Marshall Aid until Stalin blocked it.Coalition parties were kicked out of government by the communists.
Czechoslovakia became a one-party state in 1948.
Dubcek became leader in Jan. 1968, with the approval of the Soviets.
In Feb. 1968 the Czech communist party introduced an economic reform programme to try to improve the economy.
Dubcek spoke of the need for change now that socialism had triumphed.
Czechoslovakia: “The Prague Spring” 1968
Political PartiesPeople wanted alternatives to the Communist Party. They wanted other political parties, to vote & choose their own leaders.
Secret PoliceThe STB were both feared & hated. These
plain clothed police watched & listened to all activities, via telephone taps, reading mail etc.
Anti communists were arrested & show trials were common in the 1950s
The economyPeople’s standard of living was very poor. Soviet style control of industry & agriculture did not work well. The country was already well industrialised & not suited to the Soviet plans.
Freedom of SpeechThe Czechs were not able to speak freely. The communist government controlled the
newspapers, radio, arts, theatre and music.
People were arrested for criticising the government, or communism or the Soviets.
Worker democracyFactory workers wanted a
greater say in how their factories were managed. Unrealistic targets & poor
working conditions left the workers wanting reforms.
Consumer goods were ignored for heavy industrial goods.
Reasons why
Czechs opposed Soviet control
BackgroundThe attempt to win more political & economic freedoms &
be more independent of Soviet control.
Ducek’s Action Programme‘Socialism with a Human Face’
6.7
6.8
6.6
6
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Opposition to Soviet rule in Czechoslovakia 1968
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
ReactionsProtests across the West.
Some protests in Moscow & East Germany.
Communists’ reaction around the world was mixed.
Many western communists were shocked by the Soviet action, others were against the ‘revolutionary actions’ of
the reformers.
Background
Why did the USSR
invade Czechoslovakia?
Consequencesof the
Prague Spring
East-West relationsSoviet invasion condemned by the West but no more.US President Johnson wanted better relations with the USSR rather than oppose the Soviet’s actions.
Eastern EuropeReformers in other Eastern European
countries were reminded that
reforms had limits.
CzechoslovakiaUnder Husak’s
leadership thousands of
communist members were expelled &
lived as ‘outcasts’ doing menial jobs. Most of the Czech
communist party had supported Dubcek’s
reforms.Strict rule followed
for the next 20 years.Reformers remained
silent.
Political cartoon showing the different reactions to Soviet troops in 1945 & 1968
Warsaw PactYugoslavia was
communist but free from Soviet control.
Romania was not going to Warsaw Pact
meetings.
Soviets & others not want the break up of
the Warsaw Pact.
USSR not want to lose control.
Dubcek’s ideasDubcek’s ‘Action Programme’ & then the ideas & reforms that followed scared the Soviet Union & other Warsaw pact communists.The USSR & other countries were scared that their people would demand similar freedoms.USSR not want to lose control.
6.10
6.11
Czechoslovakia: “The Prague Spring” 1968
6.9
6
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Opposition to Soviet rule in Czechoslovakia 1968
April 1968 Dubcek launches the ’Action Programme’May 1968 On May Day people executed during 1952 show rials were honoured. Workers Councils were proposed.June 1968 Censorship was abolished & political prisoners freed.People demanded more than Dubcek’s Action Programme.Soviet forces stay in Czech after Warsaw Pact exercisesJuly 1968 Soviet troops at the Czech border. Warsaw Pact meets to discuss situation in Czech. & warn leadersAugust 1968 Dubcek speech said there was no going back.Warsaw Pact agreed to stop ‘anti-socialist forces’ & backed the Brezhnev Doctrine20 Soviet & Warsaw Pact forces invade Czech21 Dubcek* arrested & flown to Moscow & signed Moscow Protocol (Soviet troops to stay in Czech)Workers & students confronted invading troops.700 - 1000 Czechs were killedSeptember/October70,000 plus fled from CzechNew govt formed headed by Husak.
* after release from solitary confinement Dubcek became a forestry official & remained under police surveillance
Brezhnev DoctrineBrezhnev showed that no Eastern European country would be allowed to pursue its own reforms.Countries: China, Yugoslavia & Romania spoke out against this.
GorbachevGorbachev said that his
reforms in the USSR in the 1980s were influenced by the
Prague Spring. He, like Dubcek wanted an end to
totalitarianism.
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
Czechoslovakia: The “Prague Spring” 1968
For each statement decide if it was:a reason for Czechs opposed the Sovietsa reason for the Soviets to invade Czechoslovakia
Soviets orinvade or
consequenceStatement
1 Reformers in other Eastern European countries were reminded that refoms had limits.
2 Gorbachev said that his reforms in the USSR in the 1980s were influenced by the Prague Spring.
3 USSR not want to lose control.
4 People were arrested for criticising the government, or communism or the Soviets.
5 The USSR & other countries were scared that their people would demand similar freedoms.
6 People wanted alternatives to the Communist Party
7 Anti communists were arrested & show trials were common in the 1950s
8 People’s standard of living was very poor.
9 Under Husak’s leadership thousands of communist members were expelled & lived as ‘outcasts’ doing menial jobs.
10 Consumer goods were ignored for heavy industrial goods.
11 Strict rule followed for the next 20 years. Reformers remained silent.
12 Duncek’s ‘Action Programme’ & then the ideas & reforms that followed scared the Soviet Union & other Warsaw pact communists
13 Brezhnev showed that no Eastern European country would be allowed to persue its own reforms.
14 Soviets & others not want the break up of the Warsaw Pact.
15 The Czechs were not able to speak freely. The communist government controlled the newspapers, radio, arts , theatre and music.
6c
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Opposition to Soviet rule in Czechoslovakia 1968
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledgeThe “Prague Spring” 1968
Rank Reasons why Czechs opposed Soviet
control
Explanation
1
2
3
4
5
Rank Reasons for the Soviet invasion Explanation
1
2
3
Rank Consequences of the Prague Spring
Explanation
1
2
3
4
5
6d
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Opposition to Soviet rule in Czechoslovakia 1968
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledgeHungary Czechoslovakia
Background
Causes
Events
Consequences
Make bullet points for: background; cause; events & consequences
Highlight similarities between the two6e
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Opposition to Soviet rule in Hungary & Czechoslovakia
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
Berlin Wall 1961
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
Background
Potsdam agreement 1945:
Berlin divided between:Allies (USA/FRANCE/UK)Soviet Unionuntil all parties agree on a suitable government
Assumed that this would be a temporary situation.
In 1960 Berlin was still divided:
East Berlin: communistpart of East Germany
West Berlin: capitalistpart of West Germany
Berlin a focus for all leaders since 1945. Stalin was planning to build a wall before his death. Khrushchev often threatened West Berlin.
By 1961 about 2.5 million East Germans left for West Berlin, including many skilled workers.
The 'brain drain' was a cause for concern for East Germany & they wanted to find a way to stop it.
1953: East Germans need permission to travel to West Berlin
1957: Leaving East Germany without permission = 3 years in prison
1961: 15th June - East German leader Walter Ulbricht said he no intention of erecting a wall
1960: West Germany is bad for East German economy & it must be corrected according to East German leader
1961: 25th July - US President J.F. Kennedy spoke about the need to hold onto West Berlin. That NATO should react to any threat from the Soviets.
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
1961: 12th August - East German leader orders a barricade to separate Berlin Barbed wire used followed by concrete wall.
Events
Aims
USSR: . stop migration from East to West Berlin. keep control of East Germany. get the West to recognise East Germany
Allies: . keep West Berlin under their control. unite a democratic Germany. reduce influence of the USSR in Berlin
6.13
6.14
1961: June Summit - Khrushchev tries to pressure the new US president, Kennedy, by insisting the Western powers leave Berlin Kennedy pledges to support West Berlin
1958: Soviet demands - Khrushchev demanded: . the West to recognise east Germany. the West to take soldiers out of West Berlin. all routes into Berlin to be controlled by East Germany
- The West refused the demands & Khrushchev backed
6.12
6
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Why was the Berlin Wall built in 1961?
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Berlin Wall
Berlin Wall Facts
Wall was 11 - 13 feet high
Total length of the border to West Berlin 155km
Inner city border between East & West Berlin 43km
Border crossings between East & West Berlin 8
Observation tower 302
Bunkers 20
Dog runs 259
Anti vehicle trenches 105km
Contact/signal fences 127km
Border patrol roads 124km
Number of mines unknown
Attempted escapes 100,000+
Successful escapes 5-10,000
Killed while attempting to escape 200+
Most famous checkpointCheckpoint Charlie
6.16
Divided Berlin. Access from East to West
since 1945 ended. Families split, unable to
see each other. People unable to get
to work
East - West Relations. Soviet & US tanks faced each other for 18 hours at Checkpoint Charlie
. JFK had to accept the Wall or risk war. USA stayed in West Berlin despite Khrushchev's statement
. Tensions between USSR & USA increased. Berlin remain a potential flashpoint
. In a 1963 speech JFK said" Ich bin ein Berliner" (I am a Berliner), giving his support to West Berlin
Escapes. Constant embarrassment to USSR as people attempted to go over & under the wall (100,000+). Over 200 people killed whilst attempting to escape
Consequences
USSR/East Germany. Called the wall a necessary
‘anti-facist rampart’. Gained control of East Berlin
. Ended black market & economy began to grow
. Communism embarrassed by shooting would-be escapees
over next 25 years +
USA / the West. JFK appointed General Clay to Berlin as an ambassador. Army presence in Berlin was increased. Propaganda victory for the Westas East Berlin residents continued to find ways to escape
6.156
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Consequences of the Berlin Wall 1961
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledge
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Berlin Wall
USSR aim . USA aimEvent . Consequences
Statement
Tensions between USSR & USA increased
Reduce influence of the USSR in Berlin
JFK had to accept the Wall or risk war
East Germans need permission to travel to West Berlin
Stop migration from East to West Berlin
Families split, unable to see each other
East German leader Walter Ulbricht said he no intention of erecting a wall
USA stayed in West Berlin despite Khrushchev's statement
Constant embarrassment to USSR as people attempted to go over & under the wall (100,000+)
Khrushchev demanded that the West to recognise east Germany, the West to take soldiers out of West Berlin and all routes into Berlin to be controlled by East Germany
Berlin remain a potential flashpoint
Khrushchev tries to pressure the new US president, Kennedy, by insisting the Western powers leave Berlin
US President J.F. Kennedy spoke about the need to hold onto West Berlin.
Read each statement and decide whether it is: an aim of USSR, an aim of the USA, an event or a consequence
6f
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Berlin Wall 1961
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
Arms RaceUSA & USSR concerned over cost & risk of arms race.Missiles now had multiple nuclear warheads & submarines could launch nuclear missiles.
ConflictsUSA & USSR continued to fund allies with conflicts in:
Angola, Nicaragua, El Salvador & Arab-Israeli war.West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
AfghanistanSoviet forces invaded to support the communist govt.
against the Mujahideen fighters. The USA was very worried that the Soviets were so close to the oil in the Middle East. The USA supported the Mujahideen with
money & supplies.
Background
Detente is French for relaxation or known as a thawing in relations between the USSR & USA.
During the Cold War there were periods when relations between the superpowers improved, when tensions were reduced.
Detente1. 1971 - 1979Nixon & BrezhnevSummits x 5:. SALT I (1972): limit nuclear missiles & bombers. SALT II (1975): further limits but stopped because of Afghanistan. joint space mission: shook hands in space. trade links: more trade between West & EastBUT. conventional forces: no agreement to reduce forces, USSR wanted larger army. SALT II: never really happened
2. Helsinki Conference 1973-75(European Security Conference)Signed Helsinki Accords:. security: European borders agreed inc. West/East Germany. human rights: respect human rights & right to travel between countries. co-operation: better links through trade & cultural visitsBUT. human rights: no improvement in USSR & E.Europe. Brezhnev said it was not others business.Critics of communism were still harshly treated.. rivalry: rivalry continued around the world as the superpowers looked to extend their influence
Reasons for
Detentein the 1970s
End of Detente
in the 1980s
DetenteUSSR
Chinese - Soviet relations were not good, so the USSR looked for better relations with the USA.
USAUSA’s failure in Vietnam forced Nixon to look for a new approach, as
containment did not work.People in the US wanted an alternative to war to solve the problems.
Peace MovementPeople across the
world but especially in Europe were
increasingly against nuclear weapons.
They questioned the morality of weapons that killed women &
children.
Nuclear WeaponsBoth sides were
replacing old weapons with new
missiles.
Moscow OlympicsIn protest the USA boycotted the 1980 Olympic Games in Moscow.Communist countries then boycotted the LA Games in 1984
Ronald ReaganBecame in US President. He was very anti communist & pro containment.Started ‘Star Wars’ programme for lasers to hit missiles from space.
Brezhnev did not see detente as an end to the rivalry.“ Some in the West said
detente was a waste of time as USSR would not change.
“ “ Critics said detente made little difference to the superpower rivalry.
6.17
6.19
6.186
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Detente
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
’Solidarity’ movement in Poland and its effects
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Solidarity in Poland
NationalismPolish people wanted to make their own decisions about their own country.Quality of lifeLife was hard in communist Poland. There was often a shortage of food & other goods.People wanted more freedoms.Role of the catholic church The catholic church was very influential in Poland, despite the communists trying to reduce its role. People looked to the church for leadership.
Pope John Paul II In 1978 a Polish cardinal, became Pope. This gave the people a sense of pride & made them more nationalist.The catholic church in Poland felt more able to stand up to communism.Leader: Gierek 1971-78Introduced economic reforms that helped living standards riseBUT:food shortages continuedprices rosepolice attacked protesters
Gdansk shipworkersShip workers in the port of Gdansk started a movement called ‘solidarity’. (Aug 1980)It’s leader was Lech Walesa.It had three main demands:. the right to form a trade union. improve the living standards of working people. more freedoms of expressionIt soon became linked with the catholic church.
Results of Solidarity strikes & protests in 1980
Govt. agreed:. right to form trade unions. workers have the right to protest & strike. to improve conditions for the workers. some freedoms & less control of the newspapers
Workers agreed:. communist party
rule in Poland. socialist form of
government. Poland’s links with
USSR & other communist countries
& membership of Warsaw pact etc
Long term consequences:. Communist party undermined by workers. showed the power of non violent protests
. communists less willing to use force. highlighted failings of communist economic policies
1980Solidarity formed.
First year nearly 10 million members
1981Solidarity demands free electionsUSSR imposes military rule under
JaruzelskiMartial law imposed
Walesa & other union leaders arrested
1982Solidarity banned
Demonstrations across the countrybut Walesa released from prison
Martial law ended 31/12/82
1983Lech Walesa awarded the
Nobel Peace prize
1984Preist for Solidarity murdered
by govt. agents
1985Solidarity prisoners (225)
released
1988More strikes & demonstrationsTalks between Walesa & govt
1989Free elections for lower house of
parliamentSolidarity does well, communists do
badly in electionsSolidarity refuses to join with
communists in govtJaruzelski appoints non communist as
Prime Minister
1990Lech Walesa elected President
1991Red army leaves Poland
First full free elections since WW2
Poland: from communism to democracy …
6.21
6.22
6.20Background
6
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledge
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Results of the Solidarity protests in 19806g
Rank Results Explanation
1
2
4
3
5
_________________Solidarity formed
First year nearly 10 million members
__________________Solidarity demands free elections
USSR imposes military rule under JaruzelskiMartial law imposed
Walesa & other union leaders arrested
_________________Solidarity banned
Demonstrations across the countrybut Walesa released from prison
Martial law ended 31/12/82
______________Lech Walesa awarded the
Nobel Peace prize
______________Preist for Solidarity murdered
by govt. agents _______________Solidarity prisoners (225) released
__________________More strikes & demonstrationsTalks between Walesa & govt
_______________________Free elections for lower house of parliament
Solidarity does well, communists do badly in electionsSolidarity refuses to join with communists in govt
Jaruzelski appoints non communist as Prime Minister
_________________Lech Walesa elected President
_________________Red army leaves Poland
First full free elections since WW2
6h Solidarity events 1980 - 1991For each event give its date:
1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
’Solidarity’ movement in Poland and its effects
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
Lifeunder
communism
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Gorbachev’s effect on the collapse of Soviet control of Eastern Europe
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Communist Party. only communists could stand in elections.. communism more important than national
identity
Police state. police were feared by everyone
. people were scared of being arrested if they criticised the govt or communism. the police could do as they wish
Censorship & Propoganda. communists controlled radio, TV &
newspapers. criticism of the government or
communism was rare. people were given a diet of
propaganda about the good of communism & the evil of capitalism
& the West
Religion. communists did not believe in God
. religion was discouraged. many religious leaders were arrested
. people were often forced to pray in private
Economy. the state controlled the economy
. heavy industry was often preferred to consumer goods. the quality of goods was often poor. there were often shortages of food
. in the 1980s inflation rose
Changesunder
MikhailGorbachev
Background. became leader in USSR in 1985
. relations between USSR & Eastern Europe had changed:
. USSR no longer use force. some communist countries wanted more
control over their affairs. food shortages in USSR
. poor quality of USSR goods. need imports from USA. quality of life was poor
Gorbachev’s new attitude. Marxism had failed
. communist party had to listen to the people. USSR no longer use force
. military spending was too high. USSR not keep supporting other countries
Glasnost. translates to ‘openness’
. more justice less corruption. open to more debate about economy
& management of industry. open to more freedoms of speech
. multi candidates (communists) in elections
Perestroika.restructuring of the economic & political system
. less control of economy by communists. have more investment form the West. wanted economy to be more efficient
6.24
6.23
21
6
www.resourcesforschools.com
test your knowledge
Core Content: Option B
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
6i
Statement T
2 Communist newspapers were critical of the government
3 Gorbachev said that the Red Army would not be used in other countries
F
4 Gorbachev said people should believe in Marxist ideas
5 Gorbachev wanted to increase military spending
6 The USSR was producing quality goods in their factories
7 The government controlled the TV, radio and newspapers
8 The USSR suffered from food shortages
9 Gorbachev wanted more openess and less corruption
10 Gorbachev wanted investment money from the West
11 Religion was encouraged in the USSR
12 The quality of life in the USSR was similar to that in the USA
13 The police were feared in the USSR
14 Gorbachev introduced Glasnost & Peretrokia
15 The communist party listened to the people’s concerns
1 Only selected communists could stand in elections
Decide whether the statement for life in the USSR is either TRUE (T) or FALSE (F)
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Gorbachev’s effect on the collapse of Soviet control of Eastern Europe
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Gorbachev’s need for change. wanted to end the Cold war
. reduce military spending
. arms race unsustainable. needed Western money to overhaul industry
. needed imported food
Arms Reduction. Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty 1987
both sides to remove all intermediate range missiles in Europe in 3 years
. Conventional Forces 1990talks to reduce NATO & Warsaw Pact forces
. Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START) 1991agreed to reduce weapons USA 20% & USSR 30%
Reagan’s approach. saw an opportunity to reduce arms
. bargain hard with Gorbachev, knowing that USSR could not afford to continue with military spending
. knew USSR weak after Afghanistan. Star Wars development worried the USSR
New Detente after 1985
Reasons for newDetente
Background
A new Cold War 1979-85US foreign policyReagan (Republican) became President in 1980. He did not support detente, he thought the USA should be strong with the USSR.Reagan was more aggressive towards the USSR e.g.. increased defence spending. Pershing & cruise missiles in Europe. started Strategic Defence Initiative (Star Wars) - which could in theory shoot down Soviet missiles in space.Tried to get arms reduction but relationship with USSR was tense from 1981- 85 (see above).Reagan hoped that being more aggressive would force the USSR into reducing arms as the cost was rising.AfghanistanUSSR’s invasion of Afghanistan & the USA’s support for the Mujaheddin continued to be a problem between the two superpowers.Iranian Revolution 1979The USA supported the Shah but he was overthrown in an Islamic revolution. The new govt was both anti US and anti communist. Both the superpowers were worried the revolution might spread across the Middle East.Olympic GamesThe USA boycotted the Moscow Games in 1980, and then the USSR + Eastern European countries boycotted the Los Angeles Games in 1984.
Consequencesof new
Detente
Personalities. Reagan & Gorbachev got
on very well. Reagan thought
Gorbachev to be genuine. Reagan less aggressive
after 1984. both willing to negotiate
End of the Cold War. US President George Bush took over from Reaganmore cautious, but Soviet control in E. Europe already collapsing
. Malta Summit Dec 1989
Collapse of Soviet Empirein Eastern Europe
. Gorbachev’s reforms in the USSR had a domino effect in Eastern Europe
admission that Marxism had failed & communism party not always right, leaders confused
without Red Army support E.European leaders not control their populations
. collapse an unintended consequencenot part of Gorbachev’s plans
& took the West by surprise as well
Europeans. W.German, UK & French govts pushing for detente
. European Economic Community looking to end
Cold War
6.26
6.27
6.256
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Gorbachev’s effect on the collapse of Soviet control of Eastern Europe
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
New Detente after 1985
Rank Reason for New Detente
Explanation
1
2
4
3
Arms reductionCollapse of Soviet EmpireEnd of Cold War
Consequence
Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty 1987
Malta Summit Dec 1989
Without Red Army support E.European leaders not control their populations
Admission that Marxism had failed & communism party not always right, leaders confused
Talks to reduce NATO & Warsaw Pact forces
Agreed to reduce weapons USA 20% & USSR 30%
US President George Bush more cautious, but Soviet control already collapsing
6k
6j
Consequences: For each consequence decide if it is a consequence of Arms reduction, the collapse of the Soviet Empire or the end of the Cold war. Write in Arms / Collapse or Cold War as your answer.
Rank the reasons for Detente: explain your decision
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Gorbachev’s effect on the collapse of Soviet control of Eastern Europe
www.resourcesforschools.com
test your knowledge
Core Content: Option B
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Bulgaria 1989. Nov: large demonstrations
Zhikov leader since 1954 resigns. Communist party becomes Socialist Party
. 1990 elections won by Socialist Party
Poland 1989 - 1990. June: free elections, Solidarity won easily. Dec 1990: Lech Walesa became first non
Collapse of Soviet control in Eastern Europe6.28
Events leading to collapseGeneva summit Nov 1985Reagan & Gorbachev discussed a variety of issues, from SDI to human rights. No agreements but laid the foundation for further talks.
Reykjavik summit Oct 1986Gorbachev & Reagan discussed getting rid of all ballistic missiles. Agreement was close, but the USA would not give up research & development on SDI. Without that there was no agreement form the USSR. But it showed that both leaders were willing to discuss serious arms reduction.
Washington summit Dec 1987Discussed a range of issues including Afghanistan, Central America, South Africa & chemical weapons. Agreement on limiting intermediate range nuclear missiles.
Gorbachev’s UN speech Dec 1988Announced huge military reductions in Europe & on the Chinese border. Decision was unilateral and inc. 500,000 soldiers.Soviet troops were withdrawn from E. European countries.
Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan 1989Soviet power was shown to be limited. It become to USSR what Vietnam was to the USA. Soviets worried that anti Soviet feeling would spread across Muslim population in USSR.
Solidarity movement in PolandThroughout the 1980s the Solidarity movement in Poland had been gaining ground and winning concessions from the communist government.Other Eastern European countries were watching what was happening in Poland. Leaders were concerned by events and Gorbachev’s new attitude.Many people in E. Europe wanted changes to their lives: less Soviet interference, freedoms, better standard of living etc.
Hungary 1989 - 1990. May: border with Austria opened. Dec: free elections announced. 1990 Nationalists & Catholics won election
Czechoslovakia 1989 - 1990. Nov: large demonstrations inc. Dubcek. Dec: communist govt. resigned. 1990: free elections, communists only 14%
East Germany 1989 - 1990. Sept: East Germans escape to West Germany
via Hungary. Communist leader resigns, after no support
from army. Guards at the wall join the protests
. 10 Nov: Berlin Wall pulled down. March 1990: free elections
. Oct 1990: East & West Germany reunited
Romania 1989 - 1990. Dec: short & violent revolution where communist leader Ceausescu is executed. 1990: Former Communists win free elections
Break-up of the USSR
. The Baltic states, Latvia, Estonia & Lithuania & Azerbaijan wanted independence from the USSR, Gorbachev refused & sent in troops
. In Russia Boris Yeltsin became the leader & called for the end of the USSR & for the republics to become independent
. Hard-line communists in Russia were shocked at events, they led a coup & imprisoned Gorbachev in his holiday home in the Crimea
. Yeltsin led demonstrations against the coup & for the reforms. Yeltsin ended the Soviet Communist Party & the USSR in Dec 1991. Gorbachev resigned as President of the USSR (there was no USSR)
6.29
6
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Gorbachev’s effect on the collapse of Soviet control of Eastern Europe
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
test your knowledge
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Bulgaria 1989
Collapse of Soviet control in Eastern Europe6l
Czechoslovakia 1989 - 1990
East Germany 1989 - 1990
Hungary 1989 - 1990
Poland 1989 - 1990
Romania 1989 - 1990
Match the statements to the correct country
May 1989: border with Austria opened
1990: Nationalists & Catholics won the election
June 1989: Solidarity wins elections
Dec 1990: Lech Walesa becomes first non-communist leader in Eastern Europe
Nov 1989: large demonstrations including Dubcek
1990: free elections with communist getting only 14%
Sept 1989: citizens fleeing to W. Germany via Hungary
1989: Guards at the Wall join the protests
Nov 1989: Berlin Wall pulled down
Oct 1990: Country reunited
Sept 1989: Communist leader resigns after getting no support from the army
May 1989: border with Austria opened
Zhikov leader since 1954 resigns
Dec 1989: short & violent revolution where communist leader Ceausescu is executed
1990 elections won by Socialist Party
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Gorbachev’s effect on the collapse of Soviet control of Eastern Europe
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Collapse of Soviet control in Eastern Europe6m
Geneva summit Nov 1985
Reykjavik summit Oct 1986
Washington summitDec 1987
Gorbachev’s UN speech Dec 1988
Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan 1989
Solidarity movement in Poland
Rank Events leading to the collapse
Explanation
1
2
4
3
Reagan & Gorbachev discussed a variety of issues, from SDI to human rights. No agreements but laid the foundation for further talks.
Gorbachev & Reagan discussed getting rid of all ballistic missiles. Agreement was close, but the USA would not give up research & development on SDI. Without that there was no agreement form the USSR. But it showed that both leaders willing to discuss serious arms reduction.
Discussed a range of issues including Afghanistan, Central America, South Africa & chemical weapons. Agreement on limiting intermediate range nuclear missiles.
Announced huge military reductions in Europe & on Chinese border. Decision was unilateral and inc. 500,000 soldiers. Soviet troops were withdrawn from E. Europe.
Soviet power was shown to be limited. It become to USSR what Vietnam was to the USA. Soviets worried that anti Soviet feeling would spread across Muslim population in USSR.
Throughout the 1980s the Solidarity movement in Poland had been gaining ground and winning concessions from the communist government.Other Eastern European countries were watching what was happening in Poland. Leaders were concerned by events and Gorbachev’s new attitude.
MA
TC
H t
he E
VEN
T t
o th
e ST
AT
EMEN
T
6n Rank the events (above) in order of importance - leading to the collapse of Soviet control in E. Europe
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
Gorbachev’s effect on the collapse of Soviet control of Eastern Europe
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Ra1
9
13
16
18
23
25
24
14
20
26
2
28
A
3
10
15
29
4
7
27
11
17
21 22
31 32
33 34
12
30
5
19
8
T
ACROSS1. President’s ideas on communism in 1947. (6, 8)5. Name of US space monkey. (3)7. Leader of the USSR during & after WW2. (6)9. US President in the 1980s. (6)10. A place for missiles. (4)12. Name given to 1970s arms reduction talks. (4)13. Type of bomb built during arms race. (7)15. Country at war in 1950. (5)16. Games boycotted in 1980 & 1984. (7)17. Chinese leader in 1960s. (3)18. One of the allies in Berlin & W. Germany. (6)20. Home of the solidarity movement. (7)21. US President at end of the Vietnam War. (5)25. Military offensive in Vietnam war. (3)26. Capital of Germany. (6)27. US President after Reagan. (4)28. Soviet space satellite. (7)31. Gorbachev’s policy of openness. (8)32. Type of warfare used by Vietcong. (8)33. Gorbachev’s restructuring of the economy. (11)34. Vietcong had this, whilst the US army did not. (5)
DOWN1. Meeting in Iran during WW2. (6, 10)2. USA & USSR stand off in the Caribbean. (5, 7, 6)3. US President at Yalta. (8)4. Former General & US President. (10)5. Crisis in this country in 1956. (7)8. A thaw in relations between USA & USSR. (7)11. Country where the USA was defeated in 1974. (8)14. An arms & nuclear. (4)19. US President at time of Vietnam War. (7)22. Invasion here during Korean War. (6)23. Phone line set-up after Cuban Missile Crisis. (3)24. Reagan’s Strategic Defence Initiative (4,4)29. Hungarian leader. (4)30. Cold War US General. (4)
EASY
CR
OSS
WO
RD
Revision
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Rb1
9
13
16
18
23
25
24
14
20
26
2
28
A
3
10
15
29
4
7
27
11
17
21 22
31 32
33 34
12
30
5
19
8
T
ACROSS1. Truman Doctrine (6, 8)5. Ham (3)7. Stalin (6)9. Reagan (6)10. Site (4)12. SALT (4)13. Nuclear (7)15. Korea (5)16. Olympic (7)17. Mao (3)18. France (6)20. Poland (7)21. Nixon (5)25. Tet (3)26. Berlin (6)27. Bush (4)28. Sputnik (7)31. Glasnost (8)32. Guerilla 33. Perestrokia34. Unity
HA
RD
CR
OSS
WO
RD
ACROSS1. From which came containment (6, 8)5. A flying monkey (3)7. USSR leader (6)9. US President in the 1980s. (6)10. A place for missiles. (4)12. Arms reduction talks, known as this (4)13. Type of bomb built during arms race (7)15. Communists fought the United Nations here (5)16. Games boycotted in 1980 & 1984. (7)17. Chinese leader in 1960s. (3)18. One of the allies in Berlin & W. Germany (6)20. Stalin promised it democracy (7)21. Promised ‘peace with honour’ (5)25. Vietnamese holiday (3)26. Visited by JFK, where he made a famous speech (6)27. US President at the end of the Cold War (4)28. Soviet space satellite (7)31. Gorbachev’s policy of openness (8)32. Type of warfare used by Vietcong (8)33. Gorbachev’s restructuring of the economy (11)34. Vietcong had this, whilst the US army did not (5)
DOWN1. WW2 leaders meeting (6, 10)2. The world on the brink of war (5, 7, 6)3. US President (8)4. Ended the Korean war for the US (10)5. Invaded by the Red Army in 1956 (7)8. Happened in the 1970s and 1980s (7)11. Johnson’s nightmare (8)14. An arms & nuclear. (4)19. First President to lose a war (7)22. General MacArthur’s masterpiece(6)23. Phone line for JFK & Khrushchev (3)24. Reagan’s Strategic Defence Initiative (4,4)29. Hungarian leader (4)30. Cold War US General(4)
Revision
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
West Berlin
prosperous
not prosperous
capitalist
communism
help from USA
no help from USA
Aims
stop USSR getting control of East Germany
keep control of East Germany
stop people from leaving East Berlin to go to West Berlin
signed treaty to look after West Berlin
June - Vienna SummitKhrushchev tries to get USA to withdraw from West Berlin.
Kennedy not bullied by USSR & promises to stay in West Berlin
July - Berlin1000 people a day leave East Berlin to go to West Berlin
Kennedy says he will spend more money on arms for the USA
August - BerlinKhrushchev orders East German government to build a wall
between East & West Berlin
Rc1
9
13
16
18
23
25
24
14
20
26
2
28
A
3
10
15
29
4
7
27
11
17
21 22
31 32
33 34
12
30
5
19
8
T
ACROSS1. Harry’s big idea (6, 8)5. Not a flying pig in the space race (3)7. Uncle Joe according to Churchill (6)9. US President in the 1980s (6)10. A place for the nuclear missiles (4)12. Less arms more pepper? (4)13. One bomb no city (7)15. A place still at war (5)16. No USA athletes here in 1980 (7)17. Chinese leader in 1960s. (3)18. One of four in Berlin (6)20. Solidarity rules (7)21. Republican President (5)25. Vietnamese holiday (3)26. A walled city(6)27. Actor turned President (4)28. Soviet space satellite (7)31. Gorbachev’s policy of openness (8)32. Warfafe gone ape (8)33. Gorbachev’s restructuring of the economy (11)34. Vietcong had this, whilst the US army did not (5)
DOWN1. WW2 leaders meeting (6, 10)2. Island incident causes a serious problem (5, 7, 6)3. President never saw the Cold War (8)4. Generally a President (10)5. Country looked west, turned East (7)8. Cold War turned French twice (7)11. A country divided (8)14. The first to space in this ………(4)19. First President to lose a war (7)22. General MacArthur’s masterpiece (6)23. Not a cold phone line (3)24. Movie of the same name (4,4)29. Hungarian leader (4)30. US General made of stone rather than this (4)
CR
YP
TIC
CR
OSS
WO
RD
Revision
www.resourcesforschools.com
Core Content: Option B
www.resourcesforschools.com
Exam style questions
1. What were the effects of the Soviet invasion of Hungary?2. What were the effects of the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia?3. What were the features of detente in the 1980s?4. What were the effects of the Solidarity movement in Poland in the 1980s?5. What were the features of the collapse of the Soviet Union’s control over Eastern Europe ?6. What were the aims of Gorbachev policies of ‘Glasnost and Perestroika’??7. Describe the events of the new detente after 1985? 8. Describe the events of the ‘Prague Spring’ ?
1. ‘Events in Hungary in 1956, showed the USSR was in control of Eastern Europe’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.2. ‘The Berlin Wall was built for economic reasons.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer. 3. ’Solidarity was the beginning of the end for the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe’. How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer. 4. Explain the consequences of the Hungarian uprising.
5. ‘Gorbachev was personally responsible for the collapse of Soviet control over Eastern Europe’. How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer
c
exam style questions4 marks: one mark for each point + mark for detail
10 marks: Level 2: gives reasons (2-3) Level 3: explains one side or one explanation of both sides (4-6)Level 4: explains both sides (7-9) Level 5: explanation of both sides + ‘how far’ (10)
b
1. Why did the Polish government agree to meet the demands of Solidarity?2. Why were the people of Czechoslovakia opposed to Soviet control?3. Why did the East Germans build the Berlin Walll in 1961?4. Why did Gorbachev introduce reforms in the Soviet Union?5. Why did the Soviet Union invade Hungary in 1956?
6 marks: Level 2: description (2-3) Level 3: explains one reason (4-5) Level 4: explains two reasons (6)
How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948 -c.1989?
a