Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HOW DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS IMPACT
PASSENGER FACILITATION AT HUB AIRPORTS
WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON TRANSFER
PASSENGERS
Rami Elsamra Master by Research
Principle Supervisor: Professor Prasad KDV Yarlagadda (Project Director for the Airports of the Future project)
Associate Supervisor: Professor Clinton Fookes (School of Electrical Engineering &
Computer Science in the Science & Engineering Faculty of the Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia)
Associate Supervisor: Professor Nara Srinivasan
Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Engineering (Research) Science and Engineering Faculty
Queensland University of Technology
2017
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 2 of 107
Table of Contents
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP PAGE ............................................................................................... 5
RESEARCH DECLARATION ................................................................................................................. 6
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ............................................................................................................................ 7
List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... 8
Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................ 9
Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 10
1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 10
1.2 Research Method .......................................................................................................................... 11
1.3 Statement of the Problem ............................................................................................................. 12
1.4 Research background ................................................................................................................... 13
1.5 Scope of research ......................................................................................................................... 14
1.6 Rationale of the Research ............................................................................................................ 16
1.7 Aim of the Study ............................................................................................................................. 17
1.8 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 17
1.9 Research Questions ...................................................................................................................... 18
Chapter 2: Literature Review .............................................................................................................. 20
2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 20
2.2 Digital communications in airport settings ....................................................................................... 21
2.3 Improving customer experience for transfer passengers at Major Hubs .............................. 27
2.4 Knowledge gap identified from literature ................................................................................. 37
2.5 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 44
Chapter 3- Research Methodology .................................................................................................... 47
3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 47
3.3 Research Philosophy ......................................................................................................................... 49
3.4 Research Approach ........................................................................................................................... 49
3.5 Sampling ......................................................................................................................................... 49
3.6 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................... 50
3.7 Data Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 52
3.8 Validity and Reliability ................................................................................................................... 53
3.9 Ethical Issues ................................................................................................................................. 55
3.10 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 56
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 3 of 107
Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Presentation .................................................................................... 57
4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 57
4.1.1. Role of the researcher in the study ........................................................................................ 57
4.2 Part one of the study: observation .......................................................................................... 59
4.2.1. Evaluation of the case work ................................................................................................. 59
4.2.2. Research context ...................................................................................................................... 60
4.2.3. Characteristics of participant process enhancing collection of data ................................. 61
4.2.4 Number of observations ............................................................................................................ 62
4.3 Descriptive Observations.............................................................................................................. 63
4.3.1. General information observed about the airport ............................................................... 63
4.3.2. Number of passengers alighting and booking flights ....................................................... 64
4.3.3. Demographic characteristics of passengers ..................................................................... 65
4.3.4. Gender .................................................................................................................................... 66
4.4 Focused and selective observations .......................................................................................... 67
4.4.1. Structure of the passenger facilitation model used .......................................................... 67
4.5 Major challenges facing passenger’s facilitation in airports .................................................... 68
4.6 Impact of poor communication with customers connecting through hubs ............................ 70
4.6. Impact of digital communication on passenger facilitation ..................................................... 72
4.7. Communicate with customers prior to arriving at the airport ................................................. 76
4.8 How with transfer passengers can be improved ....................................................................... 81
4.9 Improving transfer passengers experience during the journeys ............................................ 82
4.10 Ways to maximize returns while increasing customer satisfaction ...................................... 83
4.11. Summary of discussion ............................................................................................................. 85
Chapter 5: Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations ...................................................... 87
5.1. Summary of the Research .......................................................................................................... 87
5.2 Conclusion of the Research ............................................................................................................... 90
5.4 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................. 92
5.5. Contribution of the research........................................................................................................ 94
References .................................................................................................................................................. 97
Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................... 102
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 4 of 107
List of Figures
Figure 1: Gender of passengers as per observations
Figure 2: Age frequencies of passengers
Figure 3: Response to the digital communication
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 5 of 107
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP PAGE
The work contained in this thesis has not been previously submitted to meet the requirements for an
award of this or any other higher education institution. To the best of my knowledge and belief the thesis
contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 6 of 107
RESEARCH DECLARATION
I Rami El Samra hereby declare that this thesis as an original report of my research. I confirm that
additional supporting research data provided has been credited within this thesis and reference has been made
to the work of others. Supporting research data is available to other researchers via open access.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 7 of 107
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I would never have been able to finish my dissertation without the guidance of my committee members, help from supervisors, and support from my family and wife. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Prof Prasad for his excellent guidance, caring, patience, and providing me with an excellent atmosphere for doing research. I would like to thank also Prof Clinton, who let me experience the research of freshwater mussels in the field and practical issues beyond the textbooks, patiently corrected my writing and financially supported my research. Both were always supporting me and encouraging me with their best wishes.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 8 of 107
List of Tables
Table 1: Evaluation of the casework according to Lee (1989)
Table 2: Frequency of observations
Table 3: Number of passengers at the airport
Table 4: Gender frequency of passengers at the airport
Table 5: Age of respondents
Table 6: Major challenges facing the passenger facilitation in airports
Table 7: Impacts of poor communications to customers connecting through hubs
Table 8: Effect of digital communication on the passenger facilitation
Table 9: The most effective mode of communicating with customers
Table 10: Response to the digital communication
Table 11: Strategies to maximize the returns and improve customer service
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 9 of 107
Abstract The aviation industry in general and specifically airport operations are highly dependent
on the quality of services provided to customers to achieve desired performance and success. In
this regard, customer service is deemed as an integral part of successful airport operations. On
the other hand, digital communications is identified as a key part of effective customer service in
airport operations. Digital communication makes use of the current technologies to enhance the
communication process between airports and their customers. It also promotes the chances of
enhancing the performance and standards of services provided, as well as ensuring business
optimization in the settings. Digital communications forms the basis for this research since it
improves various aspects of airport operations, such as customer engagement, improving
operational efficiency and reducing delays, primarily in airport hubs with high capacity of transit
passengers. Digital communication plays a significant role in enhancing passenger facilitation
within the airports as well as addressing different problems that affect customer service in
airports. It also offers a chance to ensure timely information sharing and consistency in the
communication processes, as well as the ability of the airports or airlines to streamline operations
and manage passenger expectations. The research further focuses on digital communication,
since it promotes the level of cooperation between different stakeholders in the airport settings
and thus the delivery of quality and reliable services to customers. Different studies have also
been evaluated to determine the effectiveness of digital communication in customer services, as
well as enhance understanding of the research issue.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 10 of 107
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Introduction
Customer service is integral to the success of airport operations with, according to Kramer,
Bothner & Spiro (2013), a significant number of airports utilising customer satisfaction
measurements as a means of refining performance standards, determining resource allocation and
tracking progress. Passenger facilitation plays a significant — albeit often subtle — role in
enhancing or diminishing that customer experience through a series of processes that begin with
ticket purchase and end with leaving the destination airport. The end-to-end process involves a
complex series of transactions, operations, and procedures, often attempting to balance smooth
progress with competing demands, such as security requirements, regulatory demands, and
business optimisation. Nowhere are these demands more evident than in hub airports, whereby
the airport’s business model is predicated on handling a high volume of transit passengers i.e.
those passengers that alight in a hub and stay less than twenty-four hours, then board another
plane to continue their journey (Popovic, Kraal & Kirk, 2010).
Failures in passenger facilitation can have a number of effects, including delays and
cancellations, which ultimately can affect not only the airport’s viability but also that of a range
of interconnected stakeholders, from airlines utilising the airport to services provided to the
airport, from catering through to cleaning. The best efforts of different airports to implement
measures to address various problems can also be hampered by unavoidable issues, thereby
increasing, in worst-case scenarios, the risks of fatal crashes (Kramer, Bothner & Spiro, 2013).
Despite, however, the presence of disruptions and their inevitability, air travel stakeholders
cannot avoid shared responsibilities for enhancing the safety of travel. While the operations and
subsequent areas of responsibility may be diverse, timely information sharing and consistency in
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 11 of 107
the communication processes offers the ability of the airports or airlines to streamline operations
and manage passenger expectations — as well as empowering passengers — thereby enhancing
their experience and level of satisfaction.
Advances in digital technology and communications have inaugurated an era of opportunity
of passenger engagement both on the ground — both within and beyond the airport — and, more
recently, in the air.
This thesis will examine the impact and use of digital communications on passenger
facilitation at hub airports, in relation to improving the customer experience and satisfaction of
transit passengers. It will also seek to broadly determine how effective digital communication are
— as well as could be — in supporting the future growth of international transfer traffic.
1.2 Research Method
To achieve the desired research results, the research utilised a case study approach focussing
on Dubai International Airport. The use of a case study approach facilitates an understanding of
the available digital communication approaches used to enhance passenger facilitation from the
time of ticket purchase through to the entire end-to-end travel experience. Successful services
tend to promote customer experience as well as encourage customer retention; as such, since
many airports, given they are providing similar, if not identical services, operate in a similar
manner, the case study research method can serve as a representative sample of passenger
experience and how it can be enhanced through diverse communication methods, which could
equally be expected to be found in other hub airports.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 12 of 107
1.3 Statement of the Problem
According to research by Widarsyah (2013), various aspects of airport operations, such as
facilities, services provided, and personnel, can impact the overall passenger perceptions of
service quality as well as their experience, with a direct correlation between the overall
perception of the quality of airport services and the customer’s satisfaction or experience. The
ability of airlines or airports to manage customer expectations — as well as empowering them —
enhances their competitive position. Doing so is not without major challenges, due to the
ineffectiveness of strategies implemented, as well as communication approaches used by major
airlines and airports globally. Indeed, Popovic, Kraal & Kirk (2010) suggest that a passenger’s
experiences and interactions with process, technology and services at the airport has been one of
the major challenges facing major airports.
Digital communication, which serves a variety of purposes in airport operations utilising
various fast and reliable technologies, is already improving customer experience ‘behind the
scenes’.
The case of Dubai International (DXB), as a major international hub airport, helps
determine existing communication uses and problems and how they relate to customer
experience, This points to ways of identifying opportunities for implementing digital
communication systems as an approach to promote passenger facilitation, thereby addressing the
core problem of poor passenger facilitation in major airports which, in turn, impacts the customer
experience.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 13 of 107
1.4 Research background
The aim of this MS Program is to research and develop more effective methods of
managing the communication in airports to improve passenger facilitation and customer
experience at airport hubs around the world. This is becoming increasingly important, since
current systems and technology will be unable to support growth to manage the number of
passengers transferring in the future. Dubai International, for example, has grown 15% a year
since opening in 1960, and already serves more than 66 million passengers a year, flying on 140
scheduled airlines to over 260 destinations on 6 continents, and that figure is projected to exceed
100 million passengers before the end of the decade.
Based on a case study undertaken at Dubai International Airport, this MS Program will
address that gap between current practices and future needs in order to identify effective methods
of supporting the future growth of international transfer passengers.
Although all airports offer similar services, every airport is subject to varying traffic
loads with different characteristics, resulting in differing demands for resources. This thesis does
not, therefore, attempt to offer a single, one-size-fits-all solution to the many and varied
challenges. It will, however, look at potential incremental measures to improve the efficiency of
transfer passengers through airport hubs. Moreover, it will describe ways to enhance the quality
of the passenger experience and reduce key problems, such as passengers arriving late to the
departure gates.
Ultimately, the responsibility for the smooth flow of passengers through an airport must
rest with the airport operators, since they are the only stakeholders with sufficient influence over
the myriad of interacting processes occurring within the airport, such as, the misconnection
processes at airports, catering for passengers with short connections, and assisting passengers
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 14 of 107
transferring between terminals. That said, airlines should also ensure that they do everything
possible to effectively manage interactions with the airport authority and other airport
stakeholders, in the interest of enhancing overall passenger experience. This demands
collaboration at a high level in order to ensure that airport operators and other influential
stakeholders clearly understand the interactions between the different processes within airports
and, indeed, at times, between airports. The result will be an understanding of the extent to which
each agency is responsible for the smooth flow of passengers. Currently, transfer management
focuses entirely on improving communication between ground staff and passengers on board the
flights and, in doing so, misses a range of opportunities, including but not limited to:
1. Pushing salient information to passengers throughout their journey;
2. Improving product communication flow, through the likes of communicating in multiple
languages, video conference etc., to increase the growth;
3. Empowering passengers to manage rebooking required as a result of disruption;
4. Providing additional services, such as selling upgrades, lounge access, and meal
vouchers.
1.5 Scope of research
Connectivity is at the heart of success in the airline business, which has faced significant
challenges in recent years, ranging from fluctuating fuel prices and low struggling economies to
global security threats from a range of non-state actors, and instability, especially in the Middle
East region. All of these factors add to the challenge of improving customer experience,
including providing the best network architecture through the likes of airport hubs, while
maintaining, if not growing, financial returns and market share. One key approach includes
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 15 of 107
communication strategies — primarily leveraging new and existing digital communication that
makes use of technology advances — to achieve the desired objective. This thesis reviews the
existing challenges facing airports as well as evaluating steps that can be taken to improved
customer satisfaction.
Paradoxically, despite economic woes and security concerns, the aviation business has
continued to grow, both in terms of traffic, especially in the Asian region, and in terms of
players, with the increases and competition between airlines putting pressure on airports to
improve efficiency while at the same time controlling costs.
This thesis posits that improving communication with passengers before they land could
reduce the number of passengers queuing at counters, as well as, crucially, reducing the number
of passengers late for boarding. For the most part, passengers, with the exception possibly of
frequent fliers, are unfamiliar with the airport infrastructure and where to go. Sending
personalised messages to customers in flight advising them of onward flight details, approximate
times to reach the boarding gate, and how much time they have in transit will not only help the
passenger but also contribute to improving the airline’s on-time performance.
The scope of this research looks beyond the communication aspects influenced by
technology advances to the establishment of the associated positive impacts of implementing
digital communication in passenger facilitation. The research also covers major aspects of
customer service initiatives at airports that have promoted the rise in customer experience and
satisfaction. According to Kramer, Bothner & Spiro (2013), an airport’s ability to exceed its
customers’ ‘expectations and needs significantly shapes their perception as well as experience
within the airport’. In this regard, the research will highlight different approaches that can be
implemented to transform customer experiences, such as the use of communication strategies.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 16 of 107
Historically, Kramer, Bothner & Spiro (2013) state, the transformation of airport customer
service began in the late 1990s; this transformation has accelerated in current times particularly
after the rise in terrorist attacks, in an industry that had already long been a favoured target of
terrorists worldwide. As such, this thesis will also evaluate impediments that limit the
achievement of positive customer experience in the airports from the time of buying tickets to
the travel onwards.
1.6 Rationale of the Research
Improving customer satisfaction and retention includes the provision of quality services
that meet the customer’s needs. Improving customer experience, in particular in the airports, is
also critical for maximising returns as well as enhancing the competitive position of such airports
owing to the rising number of similar services. The rationale for this research involves evaluating
how the implementation of digital communication approaches can help in addressing passenger
facilitation issues in major hubs and possibly other airports globally, although it primarily
focuses on Dubai International Airport. The research also determines how digital communication
can help customers improve their perceptions or experiences with the airport services within the
scope of the case study. Such research is important, since it establishes a model through which
different airports or airlines can improve their customer experience by implementing better
communication strategies that ensure timely delivery of information, particularly where it may
negatively impact customer experience, such as in the case of delays or cancellations. Previous
research in the same area has focused on ways to improve customer satisfaction and experience
within the airports in order to maximize returns as well as ensure the achievement of
organizational objectives. However, there are gaps due to lack of focus on the use of technology
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 17 of 107
in addressing problems. This thesis, therefore, seeks to address problems through a technology-
fostered approach with the ability to communicate to a large number of people on a personalized
basis, and does so by adopting a qualitative approach, which is descriptive, based on a case study
of Dubai International Airport.
1.7 Aim of the Study
The main aim of the thesis is to determine how digital communication impacts passenger
facilitation at hub airports and considers different approaches that can be implemented to meet
the desired objectives, such as improved customer experience.
1.8 Objectives
The research presents a summary of the communication process at airport hubs and
reviews how the implementation of digital communication systems can improve customer
experience by focusing on three intersecting themes:
1. Communication;
2. Passenger facilitation; and
3. Customer experience.
This thesis also proposes solutions to the identified challenges by addressing the potential
measures that can be applied to enhance efficiency while improving customer experience.
The key objectives of this thesis are to:
Improve the communication between Airlines and Passengers, particularly
transfer passengers, in order to provide relevant information in a timely manner
during their journey;
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 18 of 107
Improve the transfer passenger experience during the journey.
Support continued business growth and the high volumes of connecting
passengers travelling through airport hubs.
Establishing the most effective way to maximise returns while, at the same time,
addressing customer satisfaction and experience.
Ultimately, establishing more effective methods of managing communication at airport hubs
that connect large numbers of people also has the potential to increase financial returns. The case
study of Dubai International Airport demonstrates that the enhancement and adoption of current
and new technology has the potential to support growth as well as supporting successful
international transfer through the implementation of digital communication strategies and
processes in order to provide access to accurate and time-efficient communication to customers,
thereby improving efficiency and customer satisfaction in the level and quality of services
provided by the airline and within the airport.
1.9 Research Questions
This thesis covers a broad base of issues to establish the existing problems as well as
providing the basis for intervention or solutions to the problems. The key research questions
identified include:
1. What are the major challenges facing passenger facilitation in airports?
2. What is the impact of poor communication to customers connecting through hubs?
3. How can digital communication improve passenger facilitation in major hubs?
4. What are the best ways to communicate with customers before arriving as well as within
the airport?
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 19 of 107
5. What is the overall customer attitude to digital communication in relation to addressing
passenger facilitation?
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 20 of 107
Chapter 2: Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
The aviation industry continues to experience significant growth owing to the rise in
passenger numbers and increase in competition, especially in relation to low-cost carriers.
Kramer, Bothner, & Spiro (2013) state that major airports operate in complex systems based on
various components, which must be interconnected or interact to enhance the quality of services
provided. Digital communication provides opportunities to address the increasing complexity of
the systems as well as enhancing the quality of services provided through improved customer
engagement. Additionally, digital communication improves how passengers communicate or
access information, further improving the airport experience based on various facets of digital
communication. Widarsyah (2013) posits that digital communication impacts positively on the
airport service quality dimension as well as enhancing the overall impression and experience
within airports or major hubs, such as Dubai International Airport. By shaping the passenger
perceptions of the quality of services provided, the approach succeeds in meeting the rising
needs and growth in global tourism, which demands quality air transport and interaction
(Widarsyah, 2013). As such, digital communication in airport hubs reduces the discrepancy
between customer expectations and perceptions and the level of service provided in the industry.
Digital communication can also improve transfer of passengers or facilitation while addressing
the needs of airport operations. This thesis takes, as its starting point, a review of the existing
literature on the topic of the impact of digital communication on the overall customer experience
and passenger facilitation in airport hubs generally, as well as more specifically in Dubai
International Airport.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 21 of 107
2.2 Digital communications in airport settings
In the past, according to the Information Resources Management Association (IRMA) &
Khosrow-Pour (2004), airports did little to improve passenger facilitation and experience. Today,
however, airports are increasingly becoming customer-focused, with much of that focus
dependent on technologies to deliver more and better services. According to Popovic, Kraal &
Kirk (2010), the International Air Transport Association (IATA) provides various initiatives
seeking to improve the passenger travel experience through the replacement of repetitive checks
and provision of streamlined systems. Technology-focused communication or digital
communications have had a significant positive impact on processes and activities within the
airport, as well as enhancing the provision of passenger-centred services to improve their
satisfaction (Ritchie & Crouch, 2003). Research indicates that digital communication can have a
positive impact on passenger facilitation in particular, since it ensures the passengers have timely
access to information from the time of buying tickets and then throughout their journey. Popovic,
Kraal & Kirk (2010) point out that digital communication reduces the overall time spent to
process customer activities. Digital communication can also add to reducing the effects of delays
and cancellations of flights, a commonplace event with current air travel. According to Ritchie &
Crouch (2003), digital communication and surveillance systems are critical in the major airports,
since they enhance the effectiveness of both air and ground activities in addition to improving
airport operations and customer experience. Popovic, Kraal & Kirk (2010), highlight that digital
communication is common between pilots and ground controllers and complements other
communication processes.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 22 of 107
• Communication Element
Communication is a key element in supporting customer experience within airports,
especially in large hubs, such as Dubai International. According to Popovic, Kraal & Kirk
(2010), digital communication involves the transmission of data based on machine-readable
signals or computer interchanges. Technology advancements provide the basis for understanding
the development in digital communication within airports and the overall impact on customer
experience. Digital communication can also provide channels for important information on flight
schedules and availability to different consumer segments in real time. The availability of such
information when needed by customers is a crucial factor in facilitating timely decision-making
amongst different sets of customers that is vital to their satisfaction (Ritchie & Crouch, 2003).
Arif, Gupta & Williams (2013) state that airports, such as Dubai International Airport,
have been involved in the implementation of diverse digital communication strategies to ensure
delivery of a seamless passenger experience and enhance seamless facilitation for such
passengers to their different destinations. For example, airports have implemented way-finding
apps used on smartphone and tablets, which enable customers to navigate their way in and
outside the airport with ease. The use of such apps ensures customers key in their flight booking
and boarding information so they can find their way in or out of the airport conveniently and
identify the location of various services. Martin-Domingo & Martín (2016) state such apps
ensure the customer can get his or her gate in and out of the airport with minimal need of
assistance due to language and cultural barriers that may exist between the customer and the
personnel at the airport. Such apps are available in different languages based on the various
customer segments that use the airport based on the booking and flight information available in
the company’s databases (Ritchie & Crouch, 2003).
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 23 of 107
Upadhya (2016) points out those digital communication apps available in the airport are
synchronised with various operational ‘beacons’ available at the airport, allowing precise
location identification by clients. Such ‘beacons’, together with Wi-Fi connectivity, have played
a pivotal role in facilitating easier transition for customers in and out of the airport with minimal
complaints. It has become easier for customers to identify where they are and determine the route
to follow to avoid missing their flights or their ground carriages at the airport (Widarsyah, 2013).
The use of beacon-based way finding has also been instrumental in facilitating easier
passage of customers at security checkpoints. The beacon-based data has been crucial in
managing queues at checkpoints that have traditionally been a major inconvenience, especially to
international travellers (Straker & Wrigley, 2016). Passengers are informed in a timely fashion
about the expected waiting times through the web-based apps that make their transit, if not
entirely hassle-free, at least more convenient. Further, some airports, including Dubai
International, have piloted and adopted facial recognition technologies that minimise the need for
customers to present their boarding passes and passports at every stage of their journey.
Airports have long been adept at deploying digital communication technology in an effort
to improve safety and security. Straker & Wrigley (2016) emphasise that digital technologies in
airports are crucial in maintaining the runway lighting systems that are a key aspect in managing
aircraft movements within an airport. The availability of safe and controlled aircraft movements
within an airport is the cornerstone of stable and efficient operations that are the mainstay of any
airport, and guarantee customer security, convenience and sustainable business operations
(Ritchie & Crouch, 2003).
Though legacy systems are still in use, the expansion of digital technology continues to
improve performance and enhance safety on a number of levels within airports. Pigni & Piccoli
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 24 of 107
(2016), point out that the lighting infrastructure along the runways and edge lights are controlled
via fibre optic cables that are connected around the airport. These fibre optic cables also control
other critical areas such as the airfield guiding signs and the apron sections where loading and
refuelling takes place. The overreliance on fibre optic cables in most airports is risky, since they
are exposed to danger of damage during airport works or can be a target by terrorists (Straker &
Wrigley, 2016). Any destruction or interference with the smooth working of the fibre optics can
be fatal to communication between runway controllers and scheduled flights, with potentially
catastrophic results. This highlights the need for airports to adopt digital communication devices
that utilise cloud services as a back-up to the current installations. The use of such devices
significantly reduces the costs of maintenance of such fibre optics and reduces the exposure to
risks to the airport and its installations. The likelihood that wireless-based, digital
communication devices will face outages is minimal, which means the airport and the passengers
transitioning through it are less exposed to service risks and uncertainties that may compromise
service delivery (Pigni & Piccoli, 2016).
• Impact of Digital Communication
Schwartz (2014) claims that the adoption of digital communication devices would also
facilitate timely sharing of information that reduces flight delays, idle runways and lengthy
turnaround times that are detrimental to the business prospects of an airport. Digital
communications have profoundly enhanced efficiency in airports by promoting the
implementation of technologies such as airline sequencing systems between ground and air
personnel. Such technologies improve the level of collaboration amongst various personnel,
promoting the optimal management of runways and traffic around the airport. Such effectiveness
results in reduced runway wait times that increase the levels of certainty and reliability of the
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 25 of 107
services available in an airport. This reduces the costs of handling passengers since there are
minimal delays between arrival and departure times for passengers, based on their travelling
needs (Pigni & Piccoli, 2016).
Scherer, Wünderlich & von Wangenheim (2015) state that digital communication
technologies are also instrumental in promoting the adoption of new surveillance technologies,
notably the Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B), that has the capacity to
modernise the air transportation system. The new system will replace the current radar systems
with satellite-based systems that will ensure air traffic controllers can control airplanes with
greater precision when such planes are airborne. Also, the new system, unlike radar, can work in
low altitudes even on the ground, meaning there will be effective monitoring of the traffic or the
runways and taxiways. Importantly, such a technology is effective in remote locations where
radar coverage may be limited or non-existent (Pigni & Piccoli, 2016).
According to Lee & Park (2016), the availability of digital technologies has also played a
pivotal role in ensuring smaller airports remain open. Most small airports face challenges since
they have lower frequencies of landings and take-offs that reduce their income streams and levels
of preference by most airlines. However, the availability of digital communication devices and
technologies facilitates remote control of smaller airports by controllers located in larger airports.
Phillips (2016) claims it is possible for air traffic controllers to utilise digital technologies, such
as video cameras, automated software and sensors, to control the air and ground activities in
smaller airports when located in another area. Such possibilities translate to higher levels of
customer satisfaction, since they would have a wider choice of products and services available in
proximity to their location. The possibility of air traffic controllers managing more than one
airport concurrently and within the same expanded network demonstrates the immense value of
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 26 of 107
digital communication technologies in enhancing the level of customer experience and
guaranteeing better customer facilitation from one airport to another (Lee & Park, 2016).
Padrón, Guimarans & Ramos (2016) stated that digital communications have contributed
to an enhanced level of communications between ground and air personnel, thereby minimising
risks to passengers and increasing the level of service delivery. Digital technologies ensure an
airport has sufficient back-up of its information, which is needed for the implementation of
contingency planning in case of emergencies. Digital technologies also guarantee efficiency and
reliability of the services on offer by ensuring the airport operates to capacity through effective
coordination of the activities in its key departments (Padrón, Guimarans & Ramos, 2016). The
optimal utilisation of capacity is a key determinant to higher consumer satisfaction levels, since
all the resources will be utilised to capacity for the welfare of diverse types of customers using
the airports (Lee & Park, 2016).
Kalakou & Psaraki-Kalouptsidi (2015) assert that the use of digital communication
technologies in airports has also enhanced the protection of key areas, such as the apron (the area
where aircraft are parked for refuelling and which is an extremely high risk area). Most airports
have installed video systems that have intelligent algorithms to conduct round-the-clock tracking
of objects and persons that access the area. The video systems are also crucial in revealing
general or routine servicing operations for aircrafts while they are still parked in the apron
section (Kalakou & Psaraki-Kalouptsidi, 2015). Such capabilities are essential in the timely
detection of any extra-ordinary activities that may go on within the apron area. The continuous
vigilance and surveillance offered by the intelligent systems ensure the parked aircraft are safe or
use by passengers and play a crucial role in the detection of suspicious activities facilitating
timely remedial actions (Lee & Park, 2016).
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 27 of 107
The deployment of digital techniques facilitates the creation of virtual zones and barriers
within such sensitive areas such as the apron, in that they remain inaccessible to unauthorised
personnel. They also ensure the deployed personnel to the area perform the specific duties they
are assigned while within this area. Any unauthorised activities within the area triggers automatic
alerts in real-time to the operator. These alerts are vital in guaranteeing the security of passengers
and airport assets. Such guarantees, in turn, are one of the main sources of customer satisfaction
both within and beyond the airport (Padrón, Guimarans & Ramos, 2016).
2.3 Improving customer experience for transfer passengers at Major Hubs
Ku & Chen (2016) state that the increased level of competition between airports has
concomitantly increased the need for airports to innovate, in order to enhance their attractiveness
to different customers’ segments and airlines. One of the roles of digital technologies in airports
is to enhance the level of customer engagement that is important to meeting the levels of service
by expected by customers. They further emphasise that digital technologies have facilitated the
provision of personalised and customised service to different customer segments based on their
individual needs (Ku & Chen, 2016).
Garrett (2016) stated that the use of diverse customer apps at airports, to serve different
classes of customers such as students, businessmen, and holidaymakers amongst others,
enhances the building of a focused value proposition for each customer segment. The digital
technologies promote the collection of real-time information that provides insights into the
specific product characteristics that appeal to each consumer segment. The availability of such
information promotes the categorisation or segmentation of the different customers based on
their needs, profiles and gender, amongst other characteristics (Ku & Chen, 2016).
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 28 of 107
• Customer Needs
Chen & Batchuluun (2015) added that the identification of different customer needs,
through the use of the different airport apps, supports the multi-functional nature of today’s
airports. Most airports offer an increasing array of services to customers, such as spa centres,
restaurants and even boutique retail outlets, as customers’ transit to their destinations. The use of
digital technologies at airports, facilitates the easier identification of the location of such services
since most customers, especially international travellers, are not well acquainted with the
geography of the airport. The availability of diverse, web-based apps, promotes the easier
identification of the locations that are a source of higher levels of customer satisfaction (Ku &
Chen, 2016). The easier identification of such service locations within the airport has also
boosted the collection of higher non-aviation related revenue as the demand for such services
increase.
Airports such as Dubai International Airport have embarked on adopting mobile check-in
portals to facilitate easier check-in for their customers. As highlighted by Jeeradist,
Thawesaengskulthai & Sangsuwan (2016), such technology has reduced the idle time spent by
customers waiting for manual and physical check-ins during their transit at airports. Web-based
apps have also been used to integrate the commercial and customer care services at airports,
making it convenient for a traveller to access almost all the services available at the airport from
the comfort of his smartphone, tablet, laptop or any other digital device. Such apps also act as
interactive communication platforms for customers, where they can engage directly with the
airport staff to post queries, opinions, complaints or suggestions (Ku & Chen, 2016).
Gil, Miozzo & Massini (2012) stated that the access of most of the services available at
an airport online through the use of digital communication technologies means a traveller can
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 29 of 107
prepare for a flight from the comfort of their home. It also means a traveller can have access to
the services at the airport even when stuck in traffic, such as making purchases from the duty
free shops available at the airport (Skorupski &Uchroński, 2016). Such purchases can be
delivered to the traveller at the entrance to the aircraft, thereby further reducing idle times and
enhancing the level of satisfaction to different customer segments.
• Customer Satisfaction
According to Skorupski &Uchroński (2016), the use of digital communications at airports
has been instrumental in enhancing the level of customer satisfaction, since the mobile apps
promote easier and cost-effective interaction between the airport personnel and customers. Most
airports have a presence online and through social media, meaning that passengers can receive
updates on their flights and other services using such platforms. The availability of updated
travel information to customers has significantly contributed to reduced expenditures, since in
most cases the more the time a customer spends in the airport, the more the costs are increased in
terms of time and money. The availability of real-time and updated information to customers
promotes easier scheduling of transit flights and reduces waiting times (Gil, Miozzo & Massini,
2012).
Upadhya (2016) claims that the interactions facilitated by digital apps installed at airports
have positively contributed to the development of products that are responsive to the needs and
expectations of the different consumer segments. It has become easier to collect data on different
needs and expectations of customers through real-time interactions between customers and
marketing personnel engaged by the airports (Gil, Miozzo & Massini, 2012). Through online
platforms such as social media, travellers can make enquiries on the suitability of, and preference
for, one airport over another. In addition, digital apps can encourage travellers to read and share
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 30 of 107
comments made by other travellers, thereby enhancing and shaping perceptions of customers
towards an airline (Skorupski & Uchroński, 2016). Such perceptions are important in revealing
the levels of customer service and making it easier for travellers to make informed choices
regarding their travel, which further enhance personal satisfaction levels.
The deployment of digital technologies at airports that enhance the level of visibility of
the airport in terms of the services available can be a major source of competitive advantage.
Pigni & Piccoli (2016) are of the view that the increased levels of visibility facilitate the
smoothing of passenger travel, making it a delightful experience. The deployment of digital and
cloud-based technologies at airports adds to the creation of ‘virtual capacity’ at airports, thus
enhancing resource optimisation. The greater visibility and flexibility provided by digital
technologies contributes immensely in enabling airport operators to pre-empt delays and arrange
alternative travel options for customers. It also becomes easier for airlines to recover from
unforeseen events, such as adverse weather conditions and mechanical breakdowns, among
others, as they can easily reach their customers and keep them updated. Lee & Park (2016)
further claim that the easier management of lead times provided by the deployment of digital
technologies at airports can promote an increase in the number of flights that enables service
delivery to a higher number of travellers at any time. It then becomes easier for an airport to
make expansions to passenger terminals as its preference among diverse customer segments
grows (Skorupski & Uchroński, 2016).
• Communication Strategies
To Garrett (2016), in order for an airport to implement a successful digital
communication strategy, it is vital to determine the strategic purpose of such a venture. This
means the management of an airport must implement a change management plan for such a
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 31 of 107
venture, so as to have the backing of all stakeholders. They must also develop quick-wins for
such a project so as to continuously gauge its efficacy against the targeted goals. Martin-
Domingo & Martín (2016) add that a successful digital strategy requires determining key areas
that impact on the level of customer experience at airports. It then becomes easier to implement
the envisaged digital communication strategy to ensure such areas of concern are addressed. One
area that affects the customer experience at airports is the gate holding area. Most customers
complain of long waiting times that may result in lateness for their connection flights or failure
to meet schedules. There are also complaints of poor Wi-Fi connections at the holding areas that
minimise the communication options for the traveller, resulting in disenfranchisement and
frustration (Garret, 2016). Customers also complain of lack of adequate flight schedule
information, making their travels agonising and frustrating. The deployment of optimal digital
communication technologies to reduce such inconveniences is needed to improve the experience
of the traveller and thereby improve the level of preference for an airport (Cento, 2009).
Padrón, Guimarans & Ramos (2016) state that one of the proven solutions for the
inconveniences customers undergo at the gate holding areas is the introduction of digital content
kiosks that ensure travellers have uninterrupted communication with their service providers. This
ensures the clarity of information and injects confidence and certainty in the services on offer.
Also, airports could introduce additional services, such as digital food ordering for travellers
when they are in the waiting area, to curb boredom and uncertainty. In addition, the introduction
of self-service boarding scanners would significantly reduce the need for physical checks and
improve customer experience (Schwartz, 2014).
To Padrón, Guimarans & Ramos (2016), another source of customer frustration are
security requirements and practices. Customers prefer constant updates on the length of delays
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 32 of 107
due to the frustrations they undergo, due to longer queues with unknown waiting times. The
deployment of digital technologies, such as smart queuing systems, provides notifications to
passengers on the shortest lines and the expected waiting times. Digital technologies have also
facilitated the creation of security channels in airports, whereby customers walk through with
their luggage without the need for invasive and cumbersome physical searches (Schwartz, 2014).
Most leisure travellers spend more time conducting shopping and other commercial activities at
airports and many of these travellers complain of poor Wi-Fi connectivity in most of the retail
areas; even when available, such services are often inadequate. Other problems experienced by
leisure travellers include lengthy waiting times in making orders or items such as food. However,
many airports have innovated their retail areas, allowing customers to pre-order their preferred
products in the terminal and collect them in a timely manner. Business lounges in some airports
have equally benefitted from such innovations, to a point where a b usiness traveller’s coffee can
be waiting for him on arrival in the lounge.
Schwartz (2014) claims that another problem experienced by customers is the navigation
from one place to another in an airport. In some instances, travellers, especially international
passengers who may be tired or suffering the effects of alcohol, can lose their direction and find
it difficult to make their way to their preferred destinations. As a result, they can be late to
boarding, resulting in cancelled flights or airlines getting penalised for late departures. It should
be remembered, taking off without a passenger entails offloading their baggage, which can take
time and further delay a flight, a significant issue at hub airports, which rely on connectivity, and
an even bigger issue where destination airports have flight restrictions and curfews, such as
Sydney.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 33 of 107
To avoid such inconveniences, according to Schwartz, airports can implement mobile
apps with GPS navigation enhancements to assist disoriented passengers and curb such delays.
Another area that is a cause of persistent delays in airports, says Schwartz, is the bag collection
area. Delays in the arrival of travellers’ bags leads to delay for customers on the next leg of their
journey, as they cannot proceed without their luggage. Digital communications can mitigate such
delays through the introduction of bag-tracking apps that notify customers of the expected
waiting times for their baggage to enhance timeliness (Phillips, 2016). While every passenger
waits at the conveyer belt for their bag, such apps could reduce the level of inconvenience and
unnecessary delays.
Phillips (2016) adds that at the arrival immigration points, it is possible to reduce waiting
lines by the introduction of biometric scanning apps where facial features and other biometrics,
such as fingerprints, are scanned for easier identification and control points.
As can be seen, digital communication technologies are vital in transforming airports to
become more agile in a number of ways. Airports that have centralised data-sharing centres in all
functional areas allow customer interests and concerns to be addressed in a proactive rather than
a reactive manner. These technologies will smooth the way for airports to deploy web 2.0 and
3.0 technologies and ensure they are integrated with their operational logistics, facilitating the
real-time analysis of customer concerns and issues. It means most of the customer touch points
will not be defined by information exchanges at the point of service, such as check-in and
boarding areas, but rather such touch points will be defined through pervasive and continuous
linkages between an airport and its customers (Schwartz, 2014).
These capabilities will enhance the level of collaboration among airport stakeholders
such as airlines, concessions, operations, service providers, and security entities, as well as
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 34 of 107
regulatory authorities, real-time and continuous, i.e. remote communication for enhanced
customer experience. It will also permit such stakeholders to remain in contact with the
passenger, both in and out of the airport, at all times. Such contact enhances the level of
engagement and guarantees a smooth transit of passengers from the airport to their destinations
(Cento, 2009). For example, airports will have the capability to reach their passengers and
provide important information, such as the state of the roads and availability of parking spaces,
to facilitate timely planning of arrival and departure times for passengers. Such capabilities
create certainty and enrich the travelling experience for different classes of passengers (Cento,
2009).
According to Ku & Chen (2016), many airports have already deployed digital
communication technologies to enrich the customer experience, resulting in a variety of services,
such as smartphone apps that provide flight updates, availability of parking, listings of
restaurants and shops, and so on. In addition, interactive terminal maps aid the movement of
passengers within the airport; weather updates to customers can help avoid inconvenience. The
technologies can go a step further by permitting the use of Bluetooth technologies for the
tracking of passengers when they are within the airport. It becomes easier for airport personnel to
make prior arrangements for such customers, since their location is readily identified.
• Impact of Digital Communication
Digital applications used in airports can play a pivotal role in facilitating the identity of
bottlenecks in the passenger services available on offer. They permit the timely resolution of
such bottlenecks and the adoption of proactive strategies to ensure factors contributing to
passenger inconvenience are addressed. The use of these technologies has contributed positively
to the improvement of the airport service quality. One of the main areas valued by most
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 35 of 107
passengers in airports is the efficiency of the services when they are on strict timelines, based on
the nature of their travel. It means the ability of the passenger to interact with the airport
personnel in real-time is highly valuable as it enhances the timeliness of the travel and reduces
anxiety and uncertainty during the journey. Such interaction allows passengers to access any
required information or assistance in a timely manner. It also shapes positive consumer
perceptions of the airport, encouraging them to recommend a particular airport to friends,
relatives and acquaintances, which can be vital in cultivating a positive brand reputation and
image of an airport, leading to better business prospects due to the increased value of an airport
(Cento, 2009).
According to Cento (2009), the deployment of digital technologies in airports has
enhanced the optimisation of airport infrastructure. It has become easier for airport management
to classify passengers based on their characteristics, since most are from different regions with
varying security profiles. Such classification has been facilitated by the use of digital
technologies to communicate to individual passengers in advance on requirements. The timely
classification of passengers and timely communication of individual requirements facilitates the
expeditious performance of immigration and custom procedures for easier transit of such
customers. It reduces undue delays due to communication breakdowns and confusion within
airport terminals (Ku & Chen, 2016).
Despite many and varied challenges, air transport has continued to grow. The adoption of
technologies such as code sharing and partnerships between airlines means airports are being
used by a higher number of passengers. Many airlines have even adopted the use of larger
aircraft to maximise efficiency. The higher number of passengers within airport terminals,
coupled with stringent security checks, raises the challenge of longer and unexpected queues
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 36 of 107
within airports (Cento, 2009). Passengers are forced to arrive hours before scheduled departure
times, in addition to their movement within the terminal being restricted. This in turn can require
airports to deploy more personnel to cater for the high number of passengers. The adoption of
digital communication technologies within airports, however, can address many of these
inconveniences. For example, using digital technologies to measure and manage queues could
reduce times spent in lines and maximise time spent by passengers within airport terminals (Ku
& Chen, 2016). Such intelligent solutions assist airport staff in managing queues, thereby
optimising the levels of passenger flow within airports. Airport personnel can track, interact and
manage passenger flows by providing alternatives for efficient queue management. Most of these
technologies have been deployed in areas such as automated validation of passes, staff
scheduling and timely deployment of resources to ease passenger anxiety and frustration. The
deployment of such services in a timely manner has resulted in resource savings for airports,
since fewer personnel are required to perform passenger tasks, such as authentication of passes
and checks (Cento, 2009).
According to Ku & Chen (2016), the use of digital communication technologies has also
facilitated the implementation of biometric identification and verification of passengers. The
deployment of such techniques has facilitated easier and faster movement of passengers in and
out of airport checkpoints to their destinations. At the same time, it has increased the level of
security within airports and reduced the vulnerability of airports to risks, such as terrorist attacks
or criminal activities. It has become increasingly difficult for unauthorised personnel to enter
airports due to the application of digital technologies requiring stringent authentication to access
any area within and surrounding the airport (Cento, 2009).
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 37 of 107
2.4 Knowledge gap identified from literature
Ku & Chen (2016) claimed that the adoption of digital communication technologies by
airports has enhanced the identity of service gaps that are costly to the business. The use of these
technologies ensures the integration of disparate services that were previously not integrated. Ku
& Chen (2016) stated that the integration of different services and linking them to customers has
been pivotal in leveraging efficiency and enhancing functionality of most departments. For
instance, digital communications have enhanced the success of marketing campaigns and
collection of valuable customer data that has led to better service delivery. Such data has ensured
most of the products and services on offer at airports are responsive to the needs and
expectations of customers (Cento, 2009). The use of these digital technologies has also been
instrumental in reducing duplication of services, especially in most of the key areas such as the
gate holding, bag collection and retail areas. It ensures an airport is compliant with international
standards in service delivery that guarantees customer satisfaction.
• Implementation Strategies
Knowledge gaps continue to exist, however, especially with regards to ways in which
airports can implement digital communication to enhance passenger facilitation in airport hubs.
Jeeradist, Thawesaengskulthai & Sangsuwan (2016) claim that there are persistent gaps in the
adoption of digital communications technologies amongst airlines owing to the differences in
their performance and profitability levels. Airlines in some regions, such as Africa, experience
persistent shortfalls in revenue streams that constrain the amounts of resources dedicated to the
development and adoption of digital communication technologies in their service offerings.
Meanwhile, airlines in other regions, such as the Arab world and North America, have made
considerable investments in technology-based communication platforms to enhance the level of
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 38 of 107
their service delivery and maximise profitability. Additionally, knowledge gaps are exacerbated
by the lack of qualified personnel with the ability to foster innovation or implement digital
communication, thus forcing many airlines to rely on international experts at resultant higher
costs.
In addition to knowledge gaps, there are downsides to reliance on technology, most
notably the loss of personal contact travellers previously enjoyed with airport employees. The
loss of such interpersonal relations could lead to the entrenchment of negative perceptions about
airports in travellers, especially those with special needs due to language, cognitive and cultural
barriers. In any event, some technologies may not be suitable for all travellers. For example,
most digital kiosks located in some airports do not cater for travellers with special needs, such as
the visually impaired, since they use touch screen technologies, which may, therefore, be
inaccessible to travellers that are blind, who are unaccompanied by guides (Straker & Wrigley,
2016).
• Customer Perception
Another potential stumbling block is that some travellers may be apprehensive about
using customized apps in an airport due to the fear of loss or misuse of personal information and
data, making extensive deployment of digital technologies undesirable to some (possibly
significant) sections of the consumer base. Some airports have dedicated significant resources to
educate their current and prospective customers on the need to embrace such technologies for
enhanced efficiency and effectiveness of the services on offer. It is important for airports to
determine the specific technologies that are needed or demanded by their various customer
segments, so as to mitigate concerns among such customers. For instance, airports can conduct
studies to determine the level of technology needs for customers from different regions, so as to
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 39 of 107
make their digital technologies adaptive to local needs. Digital apps can also be made more
interactive through simple user interfaces to maximize customer preferences and controls
(Straker & Wrigley, 2016).
Phillips (2016) states that a significant gap in the adoption of digital communication
technologies in airports is that most airports do not have sufficient employees to guide certain
segments of travellers, such as ‘baby boomers’ and older passengers, who may not be adept at
using digital technology. Despite efforts by some airports to provide support staff offering
guidance to travellers on the use of their apps, staff is limited, meaning most of the travellers,
especially the elderly, face challenges in accessing some of the services they may need or want,
such as retail services. As such, airports in conjunction with airlines need to deploy more support
staff across terminal floors to offer assistance to the ever-increasing number of travellers and
educating customers on the benefits or the digital communication technologies. At the same
time, service staff inevitably engage in confidence-building efforts for travellers who are
apprehensive about using digital communication technologies. In addition, digital kiosks at
airports could also be equipped with additional services, such as audio connectors, to enhance the
variety of options for travellers, such as for the disabled and sight-impaired, in accessing the
required services.
• Airport Architecture
Straker & Wrigley (2016) add that another persistent challenge facing the adoption of
digital communications at airports is the architecture of most airport terminals. Many have areas
with thick glass and multilevel designs, creating difficulties in determining the exact location of
travellers by airport personnel, making it even more difficult for the airport management to
facilitate safe and secure transit of passengers through the terminal building to their final
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 40 of 107
destination. This means attention must be paid to the architectural design of terminals to suit the
usability of digital communication devices, as well as ensuring technologies have adequate
capability to ensure they are accessible to passengers regardless of their location within the
terminal building (Straker & Wrigley, 2016).
• Demographic Challenges
According to Chen & Batchuluun (2015), demographic challenges are significant and a
major gap that digital communication technologies in airports must face. Many passengers from
the developing world have a higher preference for manual check-in desks, as opposed to using
the digital communication. These passengers, however, may be from regions where airlines and
airports are seeking partnerships with the emerging economies. In terms of demographics, much
of the current crop of technology tends to be preferred primarily by the young and the working
class, whereas most of the aged, as touched upon earlier, are more accustomed to non-digital
technologies (Arif, Gupta & Williams, 2013).
• Cultural Trends & Societal Expectations
Cultural trends and societal expectations can also play a role in determining the level of
preference for digital communication technologies in airports. In many countries there are legal
restrictions around the deployment and use of advanced technologies. Approval processes, in
such cases, can be lengthy and arduous, differing from country to country. Such impediments
introduce problematic imbalances in the seamless adoption of digital communication
technologies in airports and can hinder the operational efficiency of international airports. The
existence of these challenges means airports face regulatory, in addition to technical and
logistical hurdles, when developing digital communication solutions to address diverse socio-
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 41 of 107
demographic and geographic needs, since a solution acceptable in one location may well not be
acceptable in another location (Chen & Batchuluun, 2015).
Arif, Gupta & Williams (2013) note another gap that exists in the adoption of digital
communications by airports is the lack of capacity to exchange and share data needed to enhance
a uniform level of customer satisfaction. Some airports have adopted their own ‘home-built’
solutions to develop digital communications apps; others have outsourced such services to
independent entities, making it difficult for customers to access services. In some airports that
outsourcing has been to entities that have no experience in airport operations. Such disconnects
can lead to uneven customer experiences as they move from one airport to another towards their
destination, revealing the need for airports in a region to develop a common strategy in the
adoption of digital communication technologies to create a uniform customer experience (Chen
& Batchuluun, 2015).
Though digital communications offer a range of potential savings and efficiencies, the
capital expenditure incurred in installation and operational expenses of ongoing maintenance of
most of the digital applications are a serious consideration in the adoption of digital
communications in airports. The aviation business is a fiercely competitive dynamic, with
airports competing for airlines and airlines vying for new routes. With the growth of low-cost
carriers introducing new economic drivers, the decision of, say, a regional airport in
Birmingham, UK, or more recently, in Canberra, Australia, to vie for international travellers, can
have immediate economic effects on nearby larger players, such as London Heathrow and
Sydney Kingsford Smith, respectively, which may inhibit investment in innovation. While many
airports have turned to non-aeronautical incomes to supplement their main revenue streams, i.e.
airline fees and passenger revenue, airports may also need to form alliances (just as airlines have
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 42 of 107
done), in order to develop capabilities for continuous innovation. Alliances between airports
would also facilitate the development of robust systems, including ensuring their technology
systems are secure, which, as Kalakou & Psaraki-Kalouptsidi (2015) point out, is a major
challenge for airports. The use of wide-area and intelligent security solutions have long been the
target-rich environment for hackers and intruders, which increasingly include a growing list of
state actors, criminal enterprises and terrorist groups, not to mention pranksters and activists,
aiming to compromise such systems. The threat posed by identity thieves in this era of terrorism
has made it necessary for airport management to implement high-tech and current digital
technologies that bolster security and mitigate threats, although the reality is that security cannot
be guaranteed. Security in the digital environment extends to developing hi-tech systems to
protect online assets, to using digital technology to protect physical assets; many airports, for
example, have installed long range and thermal imaging cameras, motion detection sensors and
ground-radar detection technologies to enhance the security of the airports. Security expenditure
is seen as a cost of business with no direct return on investment. As such, the costs may require
airports to impose higher charges on stakeholders, such as airlines and retailers operating within
the airport, to recoup their expenses. Higher charges inevitably will be passed on to the end-user,
reflected in higher ticket prices or payment of supplements/fees, which could have the knock-on
effect of reducing the consumer favourability in using airports and/or destinations (Chen &
Batchuluun, 2015).
• Summary
In summary, knowledge gaps that have been identified in the research problem, include
Knowledge gaps and technical capacity limiting digital communication adoption
resulting in differences in the profitability and performance of aviation companies
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 43 of 107
in developing countries, since low profit margins fail to encourage development
and innovation.
A lack of attention to catering for the loss of interpersonal contact between the
airport staff and the passengers as a result of technology adoption in hubs,
whereby passengers deal mostly with technology rather than people, resulting in
less personal contact, which in turn can lead to negative service delivery,
especially for special needs passengers.
In the same vein, there is a lack of understanding as to how airports should
address the lack of specialised staff to guide and offer assistance to the aged.
Improvement in the digital world does not entirely remove the need for an
employee able to engage with customer needs (Phillips, 2016).
A dearth of studies examining the adoption of specialised equipment able to serve
all consumer segments so as to cater to a variety of customer needs, including
various demographic characteristics and customer preferences (Chen &
Batchuluun, 2015).
There is a knowledge gap in the impact that architectural designs and structures
have on customer experience, since the current layouts and designs have raised
concerns about customer confusion and disorientation, when customers find it
hard to identify their terminals (Starker & Wrigley, 2016).
A gap exists in the lack of digital communication that enables quick sharing of
information in hubs and thus leads to creation of information asymmetries that
may reduce the quality of service to customers (Arif, Gupta & Williams, 2013).
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 44 of 107
A deficiency in knowledge as to how the aviation industry can enhance security
systems to protect against hackers and hijackers that provide cyber-pathways for
terrorists and criminals (Kalakou & Psaraki- Kalouptsidi 2015). This gap is most
prevalent in developing countries.
There is also a knowledge gap in understanding the overall cost/benefit of
installing and maintaining the digital communication systems. Such knowledge
could be invaluable to developing countries in budgeting, despite tight margins,
for future investment in the technologies, since they have a clearer picture of the
financial implications.
2.5 Conclusion
` This chapter has reviewed the relevant literature on recent developments in the broad use
of digital communication technologies in airports, in which it is clear the deployment of digital
communication technologies in airports has resulted in significant improvements in customer
facilitation and movement before and after arrival into the airport terminal. The technologies
have enhanced the real-time interaction between airport personnel and passengers. Such
interaction has also enhanced the availability of airport information to passengers in a timely
manner. Airport information, such as flight schedules, location of retail facilities, and passenger
navigation when in the airport terminal, has become available through devices such as mobile
apps. In addition, it has become easier for airport management to provide important information,
such as flight delays, through notifications that are relayed to passengers through mobile
applications. Such realities have no doubt contributed to the enhancement of the customer
experience when in the airport.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 45 of 107
Furthermore, digital communication technologies have also minimised the delays and
inefficiencies seen in some customer touch points, such as the gate holding areas, bag collection,
security verification and arrival immigration. Many passengers complain of lengthy waiting
times, poor Wi-Fi connectivity and even difficulties in finding their way out of the terminal.
However, through the deployment of digital communication technologies, such pains have been
minimized, if not eradicated for some in many airports. Many airports have deployed digital
technologies, such as digital content kiosks, smart queuing systems, biometric identification and
even bag tracking technologies, to enhance the satisfaction levels of their clients. Through the
use of technologies such as computerised security scanners at entry points, airports have obviated
the need for manual checks of customers, which were not only an inconvenience to customers,
but were also unhygienic and a health risk to travellers, especially in high-risk regions, such as
those experiencing outbreaks (Arif, Gupta & Williams, 2013).
In many cases, though not all, aged travellers being but one possible exception, digital
technologies have evolved the level of customer relationship management between airports and
travellers. The ability to use digital apps for airports to engage travellers has been instrumental in
facilitating the adoption of proactive strategies to enhance the customer experience. Most of
these technologies have reduced the number of complaints by customers, which has enhanced the
level of brand value for many airports. The technologies have also enhanced the level of self-
service within airports, since customers can seek directions and clarifications on their digital
devices, such as smartphones or other personal devices, as well as at the public digital kiosks
placed within an airport. Such personalisation of the service has enhanced the value proposition
within airports that enriches the customer experience (Arif, Gupta & Williams, 2013).
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 46 of 107
Also, the deployment of digital communication technologies in airports has arguably
reduced the vulnerability of airports to security threats. The technologies such as imaging
systems around the boundaries of an airport, coupled with ground and radar surveillance, have
improved traveller security, except in isolated incidents. Such improvements have encouraged
the nature and number of travellers preferring air travel for its efficiency and effectiveness.
Further, the enhanced communication between ground and air personnel through digital
communication technologies has reduced the likelihood of accidents or incidents in critical areas
of airports, such as runways and apron areas. It ensures passengers, especially international
travellers that make several stopovers, have little to fear regarding their security, especially in
countries or regions perceived as danger zones, all of which contributes positively to higher
satisfaction levels and enriches the value chain for airports.
Though there is much to be found by way of positive trends, there is evidently still some way to
go, as revealed in a number of knowledge gaps. These gaps highlight a relatively new area of
potential research and development into how adopting communications technology could further
improve passenger facilitation, especially in respect of transit passengers, both in the air and on
the ground at international airport hubs.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 47 of 107
Chapter 3- Research Methodology
3.1 Introduction
This research methodology chapter outlines the approaches used in the collection of data
and how the collected data was analysed. The chapter also provides details of the main theories
and concepts that underpin the adoption of these approaches; including details of such theories
and concepts facilitates the easier replication of similar potential studies in the future and in other
locations. The chapter will provide explanation and justifications for each of the sections within
the chapter and clear reasoning behind the selection of every approach.
3.2 Research Design
The research design is the overall strategy that is adopted in a research study so as to
integrate the different parts of the study to ensure the objectives of the study are attained. The
research design ensures that the evidence collected through the data of the study is sufficient to
facilitate the solving of the research problem in an unambiguous manner. A variety of research
designs were considered for the development of this thesis, and then discounted. For example,
exploratory design ideally suited to theoretical or hypothetical inquiries, and explanatory
research, where the researcher aims at understanding the cause and effect relationships that exist
between different variables in a study, were weighed against adopting descriptive research
design, which aims at obtaining additional information or insights into a phenomenon that has
already been studied in the past.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 48 of 107
Given the relative recent ascendancy of digital communications technology and the
limited availability of research into its use in airport hubs, especially in relation to transit
passengers, the descriptive research aim of explaining a phenomenon in more detail primarily
through providing additional information that enriches what little, albeit far from scant, research
is already available, is ideally suited to this thesis. This is especially true if that additional
information facilitates making predictions or inferences into the future possibilities and
identifying trends. The selected research design promotes the use of both qualitative and
quantitative methods in the collection and analysis of data (Kothari, 2004). Descriptive research
design was, therefore, considered optimal, since it provided a sound basis for the collection of
adequate data within an airport setting and, importantly, it facilitates the study of attitudes,
perceptions and opinions of travellers using the Dubai International Airport, regarding the
various digital communications deployed. Similarly, a descriptive research design approach is
crucial in revealing some qualitative aspects of the customers that cannot be measured using
exploratory or explanatory research designs. The adoption of a descriptive research approach
promoted the use of both qualitative and quantitative approaches to broaden the scope of the data
being collected. Such data may provide further insights into the area of study and inform the
management of the airport in other areas where travellers may prefer digital communications
technologies to be deployed within the airport. Another important aspect is that use of the
descriptive research design approach also permitted the researcher to ensure the confidentiality
and flexibility of the research process, through respondents being asked to respond to a
questionnaire in a confidential manner and in their own time.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 49 of 107
3.3 Research Philosophy
Research philosophy refers to beliefs and convictions of the researcher regarding how the
data for the research should be gathered and also analysed (Kothari, 2004). This research adopts
a post-positivism approach, in which it is accepted that the personal knowledge and expertise of
the researcher will have an integral role in interpreting the findings made from the data, since
human knowledge and capabilities are not always necessarily based on solid foundations, but
rather on different forms of conjecture.
3.4 Research Approach
Two main forms of research approach were considered for this study: The deductive
approach, which tends to be quantitative in nature and is used when a study aims to test a theory
using a predetermined hypothesis in order to determine causality using known empirical
methods; the inductive approach, on the other hand, aims at analysing the collected data so as to
generate new theories or perspectives and utilises a set of research questions that are tied to the
objectives of the study. Since the aim here was not to test any particular theory but to explore
previously studied areas from a different perspective, the latter approach, which tends to be
qualitative in nature, was adopted for this thesis, primarily because it held the potential for the
discovery of new phenomena.
3.5 Sampling
The study utilised probability sampling to collect information from the targeted groups of
respondents i.e. travellers transiting within Dubai International Airport. Probability sampling is
an effective approach, since it provides a chance for equal selection of the sample between
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 50 of 107
members of different groups. Hence, the method provides equal probabilities and has less bias in
sample selection compared to other methods. The rationale for selecting probability sampling is
that the approach offers a better chance of collecting results that are less biased. Such an
approach also facilitates a higher level of representation of the targeted population through the
sample, which is vital to ensuring the conclusions and inferences made from the data are factual
and representative of the population.
The targeted sample size for this study was 100 respondents and, since the main target for
the study was transit passengers, the study deployed the use of simple random sampling in
determining the respondents. Such an approach ensures that every passenger had an equal chance
of being selected to be a member of the sample, thereby eliminating any inherent and/or
conscious bias that may undermine the quality of the data collected. Simple random sampling
was also preferred since most of the members of the targeted population would be similar in vital
respects; notably, most would be using Dubai International Airport as a transit point to other
destinations, would most likely be foreign, meaning they would have no personal attachment to
the airport, would use the same routes as other passengers within the airport, and being general
travellers, as opposed to VIPs, would be subjected to the same security checks and processes.
3.6 Data Collection
For the collection of data to be a smooth process, relevant permission was obtained from
the supervisors and airport managers. The airport manager gave the researcher permission to
engage with hub employees and also for the hub employees to provide any relevant information
to the researcher. The two primary sources for collecting data were, firstly, from airport
operations; secondly from passengers.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 51 of 107
In terms of airport operations, the researcher’s direct observations determined the
modalities used by airlines to communicate with their customers on incoming flights, which were
vital in arriving at valid conclusions based on the nature of observations made (Neuman, 2006).
The observations also provided the researcher with an opportunity to seek clarifications
from the airport personnel on how customers access information regarding their onward flights
before they land. This information is important in facilitating the timely transit of passengers to
their onward flights without delays. Also, through direct observation, the researcher was able
identify whether customers were able to navigate the airport so as to identify the gates they
would use based on the nature of their travel. Of special interest was identifying any transit
customers who got lost or could not identify what gate they were supposed to use.
The second stage of data collection from passengers involved the use of open-ended
questionnaires. One of the main attributes of using the questionnaire approach is that it enabled
the collection of significant amounts of data from a sufficiently sized population in a cost-
effective manner, as well as making it easier to quantify and analyse the data collected using
minimal resources. Limiting interactions between the researcher and the respondents also helped
eradicate interviewer bias. That said, questionnaires could be of limited use in determining the
emotions and attitudes of the respondents. The use of open-ended questions, however, did not
limit the respondent to any specific answers and accorded them more leeway to include
additional information when answering questionnaires. The extra information was beneficial in
that it gave the researcher an opportunity to assess the perceptions and feelings of a respondent
on issues being addressed. It also helped point to gaps in the current communication processes
between ground and air from the customer’s point of view.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 52 of 107
Additionally, open-ended questions reduced response error, since there was a greater
likelihood of the respondent reading and understanding questions, as compared to close-ended
questions where a respondent is only required to tick boxes with predetermined answers. In some
cases, a respondent might not even recall the answers given in the case of close-ended questions,
unlike open-ended ones.
The questionnaires were handed to respondents as they waited for clearance at various
points within the airport at different times of day, based on traffic volumes. The respondents then
dropped the completed questionnaires at strategic places within the airport before they left for
their other destinations.
3.7 Data Analysis
The data collected underwent various processes to ensure the objectives of the study were
attained. The first stage involved data processing, using spreadsheets to classify results into rows
and columns based on the similarities or trends in the responses received from the respondents.
The second stage involved data cleaning, which entailed:
• Identifying all the research data collected for effective cleaning
• Identifying data that is likely to benefit the research
• Discarding data that was incomplete;
• Record matching different responses from the respondents to each of the
questions; and
• De-duplication to eliminate duplicated answers to be ignored and not considered
for analysis.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 53 of 107
The process enhanced the originality of the collected data so as to maintain the validity of
the study (Adèr & Mellenbergh, 2008).
The data was then analysed using a mixed methods approach, i.e. qualitative and
quantitative methods; the main qualitative method used was content analysis; the main
quantitative method used involved the calculation of descriptive statistics, such as the median,
mean and standard deviation of the collected data. The use of the two approaches was vital in
enhancing the quality of the inferences drawn from the data. Data visualization techniques, such
as graphs, pie charts, and tables, were applied to enhance the visibility of the data being
analysed.
3.8 Validity and Reliability
The validity of a research study entails determining the credibility of the research process
so as to decipher whether the findings of such a study are genuine. One form of validity is
internal validity, which refers to the credibility of the research processes and instruments
deployed during the research process. For this study, the researcher developed clearly worded
questions aimed at addressing the topic under investigation. The researcher was acutely aware of
the fact that some of the passengers may not have had advanced English language skills, since it
would likely be their second language. As such, questions were carefully structured in simple
English to enhance easier understanding and comprehension. The fact that the questionnaire used
open-ended questions, as previously discussed, gave participants the resulting freedom to express
themselves and further enhanced the level of internal validity for the study, ensuring the
instruments deployed measured what they were intended to measure.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 54 of 107
In terms of external validity, which relates to the possibility of the results obtained in a
study being generalised beyond the confines of the current study, this study drew travellers as
respondents, rather than local workers in the airport. The answers they provided were based on
their experiences within the confines of the airport as they utilised the various forms of digital
communications installed at different points within the hub. As such, the findings of this study
could easily be generalised to other airports with similar facilities and status, regardless of
geographic location.
In addressing the reliability of a study, in other words the possibility that, if a similar
study were to be conducted, the findings would be similar, the reliability of this study was
assured through respondents accessing the identical facilities, i.e. digital communication
platforms within the airport. The questions were based on the digital communication
technologies accessible to all transit passengers using the airport to connect to their destinations.
This means if a similar study is conducted, the same services, i.e. digital communications, would
be accessible to future respondents, thereby offering a high level of reliability.
The reliability and validity of the research instruments were tested for credibility whereby
the researcher conducted a pilot study in the airport so as to establish whether the descriptive
methods would yield enough information that would be fit to provide recommendations and
conclusions, so as to fill the existing research gaps and also reinforce the existing studies. The
researcher visited the airport weeks before the commencement of the research and issued 12
questionnaires to random respondents. He also engaged in informal conversations with random
persons and observed various aspects so as to establish whether the observations would provide
quantifiable and adequate information for purposes of analysis. After the questionnaires were
returned, the researcher was able to eliminate ambiguous questions and clarify any unclear
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 55 of 107
statements that would have resulted in misinterpretation of information. Any grammatical errors
and irrelevant information were also eliminated. After the adjustments, the questionnaires were
issued again to a different group of respondents in order to make a final assessment. After the
pre-test of questionnaires, they were ready for the real field data collection. Information from the
pilot study was not included in the data collected in the final study, since the intention was only
to test for validity and reliability of the descriptive research approach.
The validity and reliability process further adopted the test-retest process to determine if
the data given by the research participants was similar on two occasions. Reliable data was
determined by positive correlation between the test and retest data. The process was effective in
enhancing the quality of the research process as well as ensuring the appropriate information was
provided in order to enhance decision making. Additionally, the validity and reliability process
further promoted the chances of determining the usability of the research data and demonstrated
how it serves as an actual representation of the real life situation.
3.9 Ethical Issues
One ethical issue that needed to be addressed was informed consent, whether through
observation or in relation to answering the questionnaire. The researcher scrupulously ensured all
respondents were clearly informed of what the research entailed. They were also informed of
how the collected data and information would be used. Each of the respondents was also
informed of their right to withdraw or refuse to participate in the research and that participation
in the research was entirely voluntary. These measures not only ensured the respondents did not
feel they participated in the research under duress or coercion, it ensured the data collected was
genuine and of high quality.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 56 of 107
Another ethical issue was the privacy and confidentiality of the information provided.
Participants, again whether those involved in observation and discussions or respondents to the
questionnaire, were assured that the information they provided would not be shared with any
unauthorised person or entity and could be used against them. To further protect the privacy and
confidentiality of the respondents, the researcher used pseudonyms, rather than the actual names
of the respondents. Ensuring the anonymity of the participants and respondents enhanced the
quality of responses, since there were no fears of victimization resulting from the information
provided.
The researcher adhered to the highest levels of honesty, integrity and fairness throughout
the research process. The researcher adhered to professional guidelines when analysing and
reporting on the findings of the research, including ensuring that there was no falsification or
manipulation of the results. By observing the highest levels of objectivity and integrity during
the research process there were no incidents that might have raised concern or any conflicts of
interest.
3.10 Conclusion
This chapter has outlined the main methods and techniques deployed to gather and
analyse the data, along with the theories and reasons underlying the selection of approaches
adopted. This allows the current study to be replicated within similar settings so as to determine
the authenticity of the findings. This chapter also outlined the main ethical concerns connected to
the study and how each of those concerns was addressed in order to establish the validity and
reliability of the study.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 57 of 107
Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Presentation
4.1 Introduction
The overriding purpose of this study was to establish the impact of digital communication
on passenger facilitation in airport hubs, utilising Dubai International Airport as a case study.
This chapter details the analysis and presentation of behavioural, institutional and informational
data collected. The researcher was a reflective practitioner in the study and was a participant-
observer of the hub in order to acquire empirical data for a longitudinal study. This means that
the researcher was physically present to witness any positive or negative effects of the digital
communication in the natural setting of the study phenomenon. According to Chen &
Batchuluun (2015), participant observation refers to a situation where a researcher is required to
spend considerable time in the field, study the phenomenon within its social and cultural context,
and make conclusions from observations learnt in practice. This research sought evidence
supporting the research problem in Dubai International Airport and aimed to minimise concerns
over objectivity in order to maintain the research rigour by viewing any employees involved and
participating passengers as collaborative informants.
4.1.1. Role of the researcher in the study
During data collection the researcher played a number of roles so as to make sure the data
collected was framed to fit the objectives of the research and also to ensure that the information
collected was relevant and unambiguous. Some of the roles played included:
• Ethnographer: Chen & Batchuluun (2015), describe an ethnographer as a person
who studies the specific cultures and practices of a certain group of individuals or
independent entities in order to make empirical inferences. The researcher
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 58 of 107
administered questionnaires and also engaged in participant observation in order
to acquire information. The researcher in the course of the project studied the
organisational culture, internal controls and employees of the Dubai International
Airport and made constant enquiries from inside the entity. The enquiries were
often non-programmatic, open and informal conversations with the likes of
colleagues, executives of the Emirates Airline Digital Lab, and service providers
to the company.
• Professional: The researcher had a pre-existing broad knowledge of the research
phenomenon and a solid foundation of general information and experience
concerning the aviation industry and airport operations. As such, he was able to
understand what he was studying and was, therefore, able to conduct professional
in-depth research. Applying personal knowledge in his conversations, enquiries
and seeking appropriate permission, he made a good impression and earned the
trust of the managers, who in turn allowed him unlimited access to sources and
contacts, which he elicited from the company and which added to the diversity of
the informational sources.
• Historian: The researcher accessed open-source data originally generated by the
company and accessible to the outside world, including company journals,
financial reports, business plans and newspaper articles. The researcher had
sophisticated background knowledge and his long history of airport operations
enabled him to quickly and accurately identify the key areas contributing to the
research.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 59 of 107
4.1.2. Synopsis of data collected
Data was collected through participant observation by the researcher and also through the
administered open-ended questionnaires, which were given to the various randomly
selected respondents. This data was then analysed using both qualitative and quantitative
techniques, so as to establish contribution to the case study.
4.2 Part one of the study: observation
4.2.1. Evaluation of the case work
Observation as a method of collecting data can at times be faced with issues of bias, since a
researcher may prefer to bend his observations to fit his own opinion. Lee (1989) designed a
model that is used as a basis for evaluating the reliability of observed data known as the MIS
data. In this case, academic study was enriched with the practice of the researcher as a
participant-observer, while the reliability and validity of the research results were enhanced by
the accountability of the researcher to his work at the airport. The research approach was
subjected to a test to check the compliance of the study with the natural science model of MIS
case study research, based on Lee (1989). It was essential to establish if the researcher had failed
to comply with any of the expectations of the model due to compromised objectivity. The
analysis is presented in the table below.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 60 of 107
Table 4.1 Evaluation of the casework, Lee (1989)
Problem Solution
Making controlled observations
The researcher made controlled decisions in the natural settings of the case study by testing the same theory on different occasions (e.g. finding out the major challenges facing customers)
Making of controlled deductions The researcher made controlled decisions following the verbal comments received from different conversations.
Replicability The research results from the case design can be applied to diverse cases
Generalisation
The resulting theory is not only applicable to the Dubai International Airport but can be applied across other airports in the world and still provide similar if not the same results.
The study established the reliability and validity of the research information collected and
eliminated concerns over the subjectivity of the researcher or the lack of rigorousness in the
study. The observations and deductions made were controlled by what the researcher had
actually seen, heard or experienced during his time at the airport as an observer. According to the
above test model, the results were also reliable as it was possible to use the findings in any other
airport setting and still come up with similar if not the same results.
4.2.2. Research context
The study was based in the Dubai International Airport and involved participative
observation where the researcher was an active participant of the research and also administered
questionnaires at various points of the research. Through presentation of the relevant documents
from the institution, the researcher was allowed unparalleled access to information. Any
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 61 of 107
employees involved were well aware of his existence, which made the research easier as he was
able to establish friendly relations and conduct informal conversations that led to important
information being elicited. To be sure, there were a few problems with hostile workers who did
not welcome being studied, as well other who were ‘not themselves’ once they realised they
were in fact being observed, but since the study was not based on the employee behaviour, other
sources of information, such as records and documents, were able to ensure the validity of the
information to avoid biased effects (Neumann, 2006).
4.2.3. Characteristics of participant process enhancing collection of data
The researcher was a participant-observer, which means he actively participated in the
activities of the company as desired, though his main aim was to collect data. This method was
chosen as a number of inherent characteristics made it the most suitable for a case study of the
hub, including:
• The process guided and established relationships with informants;
• It formed a platform to identify the technological advancements of the hub from
first-hand experience;
• The process aided the researcher in getting first-hand information on the
interpersonal relations, structure of the organization, culture parameters and the
prioritised activities;
• It was far easier to understand the organisational culture in terms of leadership,
politics, taboos and social interactions, and find out facts that no one would have
disclosed in the case of external interviews;
• Familiarity with the employees of the organization was already established; and
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 62 of 107
• It was the most convenient method to collect data relevant to a case study.
4.2.4 Number of observations
The data collected was written down in form of field notes to be discussed in this chapter.
The field notes included various aspects of the study, such as observations made, conclusions
drawn from informal conversations, and reference information acquired from the organisation’s
documents. The researcher recorded more than 100 observations, of which a total of 100 were
retained, some of which were related to each other, while others made a unique point in their
own right. The research followed a systematic process to achieve these results. The observations
made were initially random but then narrowed down to specific observations as the study
progressed. The table below (Table 4.2) shows the chronological order the researcher used to
made observations in order to ensure credibility and organisation of information and also
showing the frequency of observations noted during each stage.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 63 of 107
Table 4.2 Frequency of observations
Type of observation Description Frequency Percentage
Descriptive observation The researcher observed anything and everything and
assumed they knew nothing about the hub 10 10%
Focused observation The observations emphasised the different types of
activity information gotten from informal conversations. 40 40%
Selective observation Emphasis placed on the different sets of activities that
showed evidence of the research problem 50 50%
Totals 100 100%
From the figure 4.2 above it can be noted that the researcher started off by conducting a
descriptive analysis and with a broad range of observations totalling 10 general observations that
supported the research, which constituted 10% of the total observations. The next step was to
conduct the focused participant observations where observations were more specific and
included informal conversations that were not recorded, which generated a total of 40 results and
constituted 40% of observations. The final stage of the participant process comprised selective
observations of carefully selected areas and activities that were most relevant to the research,
which also entailed recording contemporaneous field notes. These final observations totalled to
60, which constituted 60% of the total number of observations.
4.3 Descriptive Observations
4.3.1. General information observed about the airport
In the initial stages of the case study, the researcher made repeated observations around
the airport to get the general overview of the airport and general operations. One immediate
observation was the busy nature of the hub and sheer volume of passenger traffic. There were
two terminals, with a third one under construction. In addition to passenger terminals there was a
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 64 of 107
cargo ‘mega terminal’ used for loading and offloading of cargo. There were a total of six
taxiways and aprons to facilitate the transportation of passengers. The researcher counted a total
of 15 hotels servicing the airport, which ranged from five- star hotels to basic motels, offering
both food and accommodation to passengers. Throughout the airport, fully integrated and
powerful platforms for video interface and fire management equipment were in place to monitor
the security and safety of the airport environs (Adèr & Mellenbergh, 2008).
4.3.2. Number of passengers alighting and booking flights
The very first thing that is evident in the Dubai international airport is the volume of
passenger traffic. During the case study, the researcher took field notes on the number of
passengers alighting and booking flights via the airport. The figures were displayed on a digital
board on the wall, where passengers were made aware of their flight details. The figures from the
landing planes were also displayed and so it was easy for the researcher to record the data for
later analysis. Table 4.3 below shows the number of passengers over a four-day period, rounded
up to the nearest thousand.
Table 4.3 Passengers tally at Dubai International Airport
Day Number of passengers
Change
Day 1 68,000 - Day 2 69,000 +1.5 Day 3 67,000 -2.5 Day 4 70,000 +4.4
Total 274,000
For the four days observed, the number of passengers averaged around 68,500 passengers
travelling to and from the airport. As a result, the airport was crowded and long queues were
observed at the terminals and checkpoints. Clearly, the airport was very busy.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 65 of 107
4.3.3. Demographic characteristics of passengers
The figures below show some of the demographic characteristics of the participants of the
observation process.
Table 4.4 Gender frequency of passengers at Dubai International Airport
Gender Frequency PercentageMale 130 65%
Female 70 35% 200 100%
The pie chart below (Fig 4.1) presents the above information in a visual format.
Fig 4.1 Pie chart of gender mix
Table 4.5 Observed estimated age of participants
Age Category Frequency Percentage Children 15 15% Youth 15 15% Middle aged 60 60% Aged 10 10% Total 100 100%
The observations above are depicted in pie-chart format in Fig 4.2 below.
65%
35%
Gender frequency of passengers
male-65%
female-35%
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 66 of 107
Fig 4.2 Age frequencies of passengers
4.3.4. Gender
The researcher sought to establish the gender frequency of passengers in order to
understand any special challenges based on gender and analyse the impact of the challenges on
the various genders. From a sample of around 200 passengers observed in queues, the following
data was collected.
As seen in Table 4.4, the study established that of 200 passengers, 130 of them were male
passengers, which equates to males constituting 65% of passengers, while the females
constituted 35%. This finding was tested repeatedly with varying numbers where the differences
were so insignificant that the initial results were retained as a final conclusion.
4.3.5. Age of the passengers
Establishing the age differences in passengers was more problematic, since it was
impossible to ascertain the age of each passenger merely by looking at their physical attributes.
The researcher, therefore, created four broad categories for the purpose of analysis: children;
youth; middle-aged; and aged. This was necessary so that the researcher could establish the
15%
20%55%
10%
Age frequency of passengers
children-15%
youth-20%
middle aged-55%
old aged-10%
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 67 of 107
various challenges faced by the passengers with regard to their age and how relevant digital
communication was to their travels. The researcher walked through the airport, taking random
counts of groups of twenty people and noting the apparent category of each individual in the
group. The groups combined totalled 100 people. Table 4.5 displays the results of the survey,
which shows smallest age groups were children (15%) and the aged (10%). Youth showed a
frequency of 20% of the passenger population, while the middle-aged showed the highest
frequency of 55%. This was attributed to the fact that Dubai is considered a hub for information,
business and technology, with international travel tending to be the provence of senior and,
therefore, older, business managers.
4.4 Focused and selective observations
4.4.1. Structure of the passenger facilitation model used
The researcher started out by establishing the model used for passenger facilitation in the
Dubai International Airport. From the company brochures found in the library, the following
framework in Fig 4.3 was outlined.
Leadership and Risk
assessment
Communication and relationship
management Professionalism
Knowledge of the healthcare
environment
Business skills and knowledge
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 68 of 107
Fig 4.3 Passenger facilitation model at Dubai International Airport
The aspects of the passenger facilitation model as shown in Fig 4.3 are a combination of
various coordinated areas of the hub’s operations. The first step of the process is to establish
good communication between the airport personnel and the passengers. Every step needs
professionalism to work and to promote the customer experience. For the passenger facilitation
to be effective it is necessary for the airport personnel to have business skills so as to understand
the need of promoting passenger experiences as they pass through the hub. Another aspect to
consider is the knowledge of the healthcare aspects of different passengers, so as to address the
needs of each and every passenger. This area is emphasised because previously it was difficult
for passengers with some medical conditions or disabilities to travel; today, at Dubai
International Airport, at least, it is far easier for such passengers to do so, thanks to enhanced
passenger facilitation cognizant of their needs. The model places leadership and risk assessment
at its central core to address passenger insecurity and to enhance co-ordination and control of the
various activities at multiple levels (Gil, Miozzo & Massini, 2012).
4.5 Major challenges facing passenger’s facilitation in airports
Initial research focused on both airport employee and passengers, and then moved on to
more focused and selective observations in order to address the key research questions. The
researcher, through observer-participation, as well as conducting conversations, checking records
and reviewing company documents, collected information pertaining to challenges and
developed from this activity a collection of challenges affecting passenger facilitation. The
researcher rated each challenge on a scale of 1-5 based on the informant ratings or his personal
understanding from the frequency of the challenge in the secondary data materials. The
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 69 of 107
following Table 4.6 presents the information and the frequency at which the researcher
encountered the challenge in informal conversations with 15 informants who were selected at
random, data recorded and then reselected again to ensure data rigour.
Table 4.6 Major challenges facing the passenger facilitation in airports
Challenge Frequency Average Government intervention in Airport operations.
14 4.4
Lack of specialized employees to take care of special needs
14 4.4
Low internet access in the airport 7 3.5Passenger traffic 12 4.3 Constant power surges 8 3.9Environmental conditions 8 3.8 Insecurity 15 4.5Inadequate technology 12 4.3 Sustainability of competitive advantage
9 4.0
Flight mismanagement 9 4.1
The table above shows the various challenges and the ratings each received from the
informants. From the information collected, insecurity posed the biggest challenge to passenger
facilitation, since balancing security needs with facilitation engenders a certain level of
reluctance to invest in passenger facilitation for fear that the terrorists could leverage freedom of
movement resulting in losses of life and property. Insecurity was common to all the 15
informants.
A second common challenge pointed out by 14 of the informants was the perceived lack
of specialised staff to take care of passengers with special needs, such as the aged and the
disabled, who had difficulty moving around the airport on their own. Sight-impaired passengers,
for example, had a hard time using digital check-in equipment, since they could not see what
they were supposed to do.
There were 14 informants who gave government intervention or ownership of the
aviation companies as a hindrance to good service. Government entities are not profit-driven,
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 70 of 107
they argued, and thus may have little concern for customer facilitation strategies and any other
strategy that may address passenger welfare.
Inadequate technology (12 informants) and passenger traffic (also 12 informants) were deemed
to de-motivate passengers and reduce their travelling morale.
Flight mismanagement, leading to sudden cancellation of flights and delayed flights due
to other reasons like weather conditions, was mentioned by nine of the informants. Repeated
power surges, said eight of the informants, created tension within the passengers. Environmental
factors, such as the noise created by neighbouring industries, according to eight informants, also
affected the airport environment, again raising tension and inhibiting the ability to navigate the
airport comfortably.
To nine of the informants, aviation companies seeking to maintain a sustainable
competitive advantage and trying to minimise costs meant they only invest in passenger
facilitation if a competitor has done so.
According to seven of the informants, low Internet coverage in the airport impeded
passengers’ ability to surf the web on their phones and tablets as they waited to board their
flights, causing the passengers to be bored and thus serve as a disincentive to use the airport in
the future.
4.6 Impact of poor communication with customers connecting through hubs
To answer the second research question, the researcher turned his attention to passengers
in order to understand their views in regards to the communication, since poor communication
was seen as prevalent in hubs and affected the way in which customers connected. The
researcher analysed a list of impacts and subjected them to criticism or support from a group of
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 71 of 107
15 informants who were selected for friendly conversations, after which the researcher recorded
the data and then picked another group of 15 informants at different times and places with a view
to seeking their opinions, too. This was to ensure diversity and to avoid any bias of information.
Table 4.7 below shows the data analysis of the findings.
Table 4.7 Impact of poor communications to customers connecting through hubs
Opinion Strongly
agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly disagree
Average rating
Contributes to dissatisfaction and unpleasantness of passengers
20 5 5 0 0 4.5
Non-optimization of airport resources
5 10 5 5 5 4.0
Reduced airport and airline efficiency and performance
10 10 0 5 5 4.2
Increase in passenger traffic
15 5 2 5 0 4.1
From the analysis of the above reasons in Fig 4.7, the informants rated (4.5) reducing
customer satisfaction and creating an unpleasant environment for the customers as the most
common effect of poor communication. According to the study, 25 of the respondents agreed or
strongly agreed with this view, while five were neutral on the matter.
The second-highest rated effect of poor communication was the increase in passenger
traffic as a result of poor communication as to how the queues will be organised and any general
information regarding the airport activities, resulting in confusion and passenger frustration. The
study results show that 25 informants agreed with this view, while five disagreed, and five
disagreed that there was any connection between poor communication and the increase in
passenger traffic, with two remaining neutral on the matter.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 72 of 107
The third highest impact of poor communication was reduced efficiency in the operations of the
airport. The results show that 20 informants agreed to this argument, owing to the fact that lack
of information leads to disorganization by creating informational asymmetries (Kothari, 2004),
while, on the other hand, 10 informants did not agree.
The fourth-highest reason (4.0) was the view that poor communication would lead to non-
optimization of company resources, thus creating higher costs for services. Out of the selected
informants, 15 informants agreed, while 10 disagreed, with five neutral on the matter.
4.6. Impact of digital communication on passenger facilitation
The researcher went ahead to answer the third research question, which was the primary
objective of the research, i.e., establishing how digital communication affects passenger
facilitation in major hubs. The researcher first wanted to know the forms of digital
communication used in the airport and did so by visiting the airport’s digital control centre,
making enquiries around the airport, and examining the company’s journals. The research
established that the following forms of communication were in use:
1. Wireless communication: This form of communication included Wi-Fi, GPRS and 3G
Internet. The first form of wireless communication discovered by the researcher was the
airside wireless communication used for communication in handling planes, mechanics,
caterers, as well as the security personnel and equipment handlers to ensure security in
the perimeter of the airport and also through the digital cameras. The second form of
wireless communication is the terminal wireless systems, which provides
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 73 of 107
communications within the terminals between airline employees, passenger managers and
communication between security and first responders in the case of emergencies.
2. Integrated signage and PA systems: This communication channel was in the process of
being developed and, at the time, was yet to be deployed. Du e to the many
communication messages running through the airport it becomes hard to deliver an
important message in a timely manner, since the intended recipients may not be able to
distinguish the message from the other messages e.g. the advertisement messages or
reminder messages. This system, once developed, will be able to integrate all the
messages for easier communication.
3. Digital radio: These devices are used by the airport attendants to deliver messages on
traffic control and, on occasions, security alerts, and are the most commonly used form of
communication device at the Dubai International Airport.
4. Wired communication: Represented by traditional forms of communication, which,
though still operational, the company is working towards eliminating, such as telephone
booths and landlines.
In addition to the availability of the various communication devices, the research has also
considered the type of data being sent and types of data signal used for communication, which
included:
• High-speed data: A data stream that transmits information signals at a higher
speed than normal;
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 74 of 107
• Low-speed data: Transmitting information signals at a lower speed than normal;
and
• Ethernet: Utilizing fibre optic cables to transmit information.
Once the researcher had established the various forms of digital communication used in
the company, he aimed at finding out how the use of the digital tools influenced the passenger
facilitation in the hub. He talked to 10 informants who comprised airport executive members,
fully conversant with the effects. Table 4.8 below provides analysis of the various considerations
in relation to the effects of digital communication on passenger facilitation.
Table 4.8 Effect of digital communication on passenger facilitation
Opinions Agree Neutral Disagree Total responses
Increase in security assurance due to improved
security 8 0 2 10
Reduced flight delays due to managed flights 7 0 3 10
Streamlined operations 5 3 2 10
Saves money leading to low cost tickets. 6 1 3 10
Table 4.8 above represents information acquired from informal, non-programmatic
conversations between the researcher and ten supervisors. Each talk was held individually
without the results being discussed. From the study, the effect most agreed upon was that of
improved security. The argument behind this was that once the digital communications were
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 75 of 107
installed, it was easier to alert people of a security threat, thereby potentially saving lives,
avoiding injuries, and mitigating the loss of property. Moreover, some of the digital
communication devices contain features that enable threat alerts to a broad or segmented group
or audience, and other security features, such as:
• Emergency call;
• Radio terminal and network authentication;
• Air-interface encryption; and
• End-to-end encryption.
The results above show that eight of the supervisors agreed with this effect but two
disagreed, arguing that insecurity was not caused by lack of communication and that the digital
devices would have an insignificant impact on passenger facilitation.
The other impact of digital tools was reduced flight delays due to better management of
flights, attributed to digital communication between flight managers on the ground and the
technicians in the air.
According to seven of the supervisors, this would reduce flight delays due to reasons
other than unfavourable weather, and improve overall passenger facilitation, while the other
three disagreed.
Another impact is the streamlining of operations, which five agreed with, saying that the
digital communication tools enhanced communication, which in turn enhanced the smooth
running and coordination of the various departments, one of which was the passenger
facilitation, though two people disagreed with this idea.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 76 of 107
The final impact was the airport saving of money that would in turn ultimately lead to
reduction in ticket prices, directly affecting passenger facilitation, which six people agreed with,
while three disagreed, saying that it was not possible for digital communication to help the
company save enough money to guarantee a reduction in charges.
4.7. Communicate with customers prior to arriving at the airport
Communication with passengers is universally recognised as an important aspect of the
travel process. Once on a flight, the passengers like to know the timing and progress of their
flight, if there are any stopovers, and any other information concerned with how passengers
should conduct themselves. In the airport, the passengers also need constant reminders on details
about their flight and luggage. The case study sought to establish the most effective ways of
communicating with customers during these times. To identify these methods, the researcher
visited the airport’s digital operations centre to observe the various methods being used and their
effectiveness in the communication role. The communication methods found in the digital
operations centre were
• Information boards: The most common method used by the airport to communicate
messages concerning flights. Departure times for each flight are displayed on the screen
for all the passengers to see. In the event of delays, information is communicated on the
screen.
• Proactive mobile communication: Reaching passengers through mobile phones and
digital equipment, such as tablets and laptops, is increasingly becoming an option. When
passengers book flights, they provide information such as their mobile telephone numbers
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 77 of 107
and email address, in case the airport needs to communicate to them. The forms of
mobile communication include email, text messages, mobile apps and social networks.
• Brochures: Customers can learn various procedures expected from them by reading the
brochures provided by aviation companies. Some companies provide important
information for passengers on brochures and place them at strategic points throughout the
airport. The brochures, however, need to be designed to attract the interest of passing
passengers, and written in a way that conveys information quickly and easily.
• Flight attendants: During a flight, any information about changes, such as an
unscheduled stopover due to unfavourable weather or a plane forced to turn around, is
conveyed to the aircraft from the airport’s control centre and passed on to passengers by
the flight crew and cabin attendants.
The researcher had conversations with the staff at the control centre when they were free
to talk, since most of the time they were busy managing data, communications, and flight
monitoring. The conversations were informal, with no set agenda order. Throughout the day, the
researcher was able to talk to ten of the workers and gained their insights into the most effective
forms of communication based on their experience. The information in Table 4.9 below analyses
the results of those conversations.
Table 4.9 The most effective mode of communicating with customers
Method of Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Number of
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 78 of 107
communication agree disagree responses
Information boards 5 3 - 2 - 10
Mobile phones 7 3 - - - 10
Brochures 5 2 2 1 - 10
Flight attendants 5 2 1 2 - 10
According to fig 4.11, all of the participants either agreed or strongly agreed that mobile
phones were the most effective and suitable method of communicating information to
passengers, especially since most passengers would already be on their phones looking at social
networks and emails.
The second method that most participants agreed on was the information boards used to
display all information concerning all flights; eight said it was efficient, as the passengers knew
this was where their flight information was posted and so constantly checked the board for any
changes. Two participants, however, argued against such views, since most flights were delayed
at the last minute when the passengers were already waiting at the gate.
As for the use of brochures to communicate new products or explain airport procedures,
seven participants thought this was effective, since the passengers always looked for any form of
entertainment as they waited for their flights or transport from the airport. The brochures,
however, would have to be attractive enough to catch the eye of passers-by. Moreover, the
passengers would likely discuss among themselves any content in order to improve their
understanding of data. Some of the participants argued, however, that passengers were too busy
on their phones or reading other materials to be bothered with brochures, especially if these were
lengthy.
The final method observed and reinforced by the staff was the use of flight attendants to
give information to passengers as the flight progresses. This can be effective, but only to the
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 79 of 107
extent that it reaches passengers who are awake or not listening to in-flight or personal
entertainment.
4.8. Response to digital communication from the customer perspective
The research focused on responses from both passengers and the airport staff to
determine what the overall response to digital communication in addressing passenger
facilitation was, from the customer’s perspective. The researcher visited areas of passenger
concerns to find out any information relevant to the research question. One point that was clear
was that passenger facilitation model studied earlier was used from the time the passenger
acquired their tickets to travel. Ultimately, the model aims to make the journey through the
airport as comfortable as possible for the passengers. The researcher visited the passenger
waiting area and engaged in a number of conversations with the passengers. During the
conversations, he probed for opinions on the response to the digital communication tools and
how it had impacted their flights. The researcher talked to a total 30 passengers, of which 15
were first-time travellers. The researcher, therefore, picked the 15 who were frequent travellers
and analysed their answers, the results of which are contained in table 4.10, below.
Table 4.10 Response to the digital communication
Opinion Frequency Percentage Positive response 10 67% Negative response 5 33%Total 15 100%
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 80 of 107
The same information is represented in pie chart form below:
Fig 4.3 Response to the digital communication
According to the analysis above, 67 % of the passengers agreed that the use of the digital
communication had indeed facilitated their airport manoeuvres. Passengers commented their
trust in the use of airports had increased due to enhanced security as a result of improved
communication systems. This encouraged them to embrace the digital communication tools in
order to receive any announcements.
The response was positive for most of the passengers due to the fact that there was an
increase in efficiency of the airport facilities and services that were reflected in the reduction of
flight delays owing to reasons other than unfavourable weather conditions.
However, 33% of the passengers had a negative response to the digital communicators
and said that it had not improved anything significant or changed the quality of service. These
passengers complained about increases in ticket costs and custom duties to compensate the
company for investing in the digital communication, thereby forcing customers to dig deeper into
their pockets to pay more for overall airport services.
67%
33%
Overall response to digital communication
positive-67%
negative-33%
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 81 of 107
4.8 How with transfer passengers can be improved
This study attempted to identify how communication between airlines and transfer
passengers can be improved in order to enhance operations. Transfer passengers are those
passengers that alight in a hub and stay less than twenty-four hours, then board another plane and
continue with their journey (Popovic, Kraal & Kirk, 2010). Most of the transfer passengers
alight, pick up their luggage and then exit through the international terminal to apply for any
relevant documents to proceed with their journey and also clear customs. Information for transfer
passengers needs to be communicated in a timely manner so that, preferably, details can be
transmitted to the planes that the passengers are arriving on. The researcher visited the various
terminals to observe the procedures followed by the transfer passengers once they alighted and
found the following:
• Once a transfer passenger arrives he/she enters the terminal building through the
departure hall and checks in with the departure control system. Usually, the passenger
checks in himself and his baggage.
• Once the baggage has been cleared, the transfer passenger is issued with a boarding
pass with details of the flight number, boarding time, boarding gate number, and seat
number, for their onward flight. This information is also used to identify the passenger at
the security and immigration checkpoints and at the boarding gate.
• The transfer passenger accomplishes his objectives and then prepares for his flight.
The researcher wanted to find ways to improve the communication between the airlines
and the transfer passengers to facilitate timely communication. The airport communicates with
arriving aircrafts using the Air band or very high frequency radios that transmit information at
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 82 of 107
very high speed. The radio transmitters communicate information to the control centre at the
airport through the airport towers and then get feedback through the same radios on the ground.
Aiming to improve communication, the Dubai International Airport is improving the quality of
the radio transmitters to enable quality signals directly from the various departments.
4.9 Improving transfer passengers experience during the journeys
Seeking ways in which airlines could improve services to transfer passengers during their
journey, the researcher visited the terminal area to observe how the transfer passengers were
treated and identified a number of techniques that needed to be improved to improve service to
these passengers:
1. Improve communication between airlines to enhance the timely communication of
transfer passenger details;
2. Enhance customer communication skills in terms of choice of words, tone and etiquette
extended to the transfer passengers;
3. Provide complimentary services at the airport, such as free food and drink, for transfer
passengers as they await their flights to arrive.
4. Offer discounted tickets to the transfer passengers or ensure that the ticket prices are fair
for the remaining part of their journey;
5. Ensure that communication of delays or security threats reach the passengers in a timely
manner; and
6. Accommodate passengers with any type of special needs or requirements that may hinder
their transfer.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 83 of 107
The aviation company had outlined some of these strategies in next year’s agenda and
was waiting for approval from the board of directors.
4.10 Ways to maximize returns while increasing customer satisfaction
The researcher, as a participant-observer, gained significant insight into how Dubai
International airport operates its organizational structures, organizational cultures, and corporate
governance effectiveness. In concluding the study, the last objective of the research was to find
out which strategies the aviation company could implement in order to maximize returns while
still being in a position to provide a quality customer experience. The researcher talked to a
number of executive officers and marketing staff, totalling 15 well-placed participants. It was
established that the company aimed at using customer/marketing-orientated strategies aimed at
improving service quality and securing brand loyalty, alongside cost control strategies. This
would not only help the company to gain a competitive advantage over the other aviation
companies, but would also enhance activities that would lead to the improvement of customer
service. The various participants rated strategies that they believed would lead to the desired
effects, with the following Table 4.11 detailing the results of discussions.
Table 4.11 Strategies to maximize the returns and improve customer service.
Opinion Frequency Enhance the digital equipment 13Add to the number of terminals 14Alliances, mergers and takeovers 5
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 84 of 107
Widening the route network 12 Achieving a low cost of operation 13Investing in modern aircraft 10
The participants suggested six strategies to enhance the competitive advantage of the
business and still achieve quality passenger facilitation. The strategy with the highest frequency
(14) was the construction of more terminals. Dubai International Airport’s success has resulted in
creating a busy international hub with a high level of transfer passenger traffic. Construction of
new terminals will undoubtedly help to reduce passenger traffic and reduce overcrowding in
existing terminals already operating at, or stretching, full capacity.
A total of 13 participants suggested enhancing the digital equipment used in the airport,
arguing that doing so would make operations and communications easier. Both operations and
communication played a pivotal role in enhancing the competitive advantage of the hub and also
ensuring that the customers were best served. Effective communication would also enhance
security and coordination of activities, facilitating the passenger experience.
Of the 15 participants, 13 thought it was important for the airline to reduce the costs of
operation in order to reduce charges and increase profits.
Widening the network’s route, so passengers could travel to more destinations, according
to 12 participants, would improve competitive advantage and gain more customers.
A total of 10 participants said that investing in new aircraft was also a strategy to improve
the performance and passenger facilitation, since improved comfort would enhance customer
loyalty as well as attract new customers.
According to five participants, alliances, mergers and takeovers would improve
competitive advantage and the quality of customer experiences, by combining resources and
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 85 of 107
intellectual capital to bring maximum benefits, while at the same time rationalising competition
and increasing profits.
4.11. Summary of discussion
The research resulted in high-quality information and valuable insights being recorded,
allowing the researcher to be able to collate information relevant to all the research questions
and objectives of the study. The participant-observer research approach aided the researcher in
gaining unparalleled access to information and first-hand experience of the phenomenon being
researched. Early challenges, such as the mild hostility of some employers who did not
welcome scrutiny, were quickly resolved, enabling the researcher to learn more about the
general characteristics of the hub and the surrounding environment, through descriptive
observations conducted in the earlier phase of the research.
The overall theme of the study was to establish the impact of Digital Communications on
Passenger facilitation in airport hubs based on a case study of the Dubai International airport. It
was established that digital communication could indeed have a positive impact on customer
experience. Communication was found to be a vital element in improving customer experience,
which has prompted the company to invest further in communication products and services.
Discussions of various aspects surrounding the use of communication in the hub
incorporated examining methods of communication between airlines and transfer passengers and
possible solutions to communication problems. Challenges facing the customers at the hub and
solutions to the challenges were also addressed.
Apart from customer facilitation issues, the research also sought answers to how the hub
could support the growth of the business and improve customer loyalty.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 86 of 107
As the study concluded, the final step of the research was to explore ways in which the
company could maximise profits and also improve on the quality of services provided to
customers at the same time.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 87 of 107
Chapter 5: Summary, Conclusions and
Recommendations
5.1. Summary of the Research
All airports are subject to varying passenger traffic flows with different characteristics,
customer segments resulting, and differing demands for resources. This research does not
provide a single or one-size-fits-all solution to the various challenges that airports face. It does,
however, point the way to potential measures whereby the efficiency of customer service,
especially for transfer passengers through major hubs, can be improved. Moreover, it identified
ways to enhance the quality and relevance of digital communication used so as to reduce
passenger inconvenience and suit the various customer needs.
Being a highly competitive industry, the air transport business demands the ongoing
implementation of diverse strategies to improve customer satisfaction, generate customer loyalty,
control costs and increase returns. The research evaluated the impact of digital communications
on passenger facilitation at major hubs, as it relates to improving customer experience and
satisfaction. The research also determined how effective the digital communication could be in
improving customer experience, as well as supporting future growth of the international transfer
business. Dubai International airport was used as a case study to determine the existing problems
and solutions in the use of digital communication and how it relates to the customer experience,
which highlighted the need to implement digital communication strategies as an approach to
improving passenger facilitation, especially for transfer passengers. That said, digital
communication serves a variety of activities in the airport and is entirely dependent on
technology that is fast and reliable.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 88 of 107
The main problem addressed in the research includes poor passenger facilitation in major
airports, which in turn impacts the customer experience. The number of flights across the globe
continues to grow rapidly, increasingly putting more pressure on the airline industry to meet
travel demand, while at the same time competition between airlines puts pressure on airports to
improve efficiencies, control costs, and cater for changing traffic patterns, all of which have
direct implications for passenger facilitation and managing high levels of transfer traffic within
the airport.
Improving communication between airlines and customers before they land could well go
some way to reducing the number of passengers queuing at counters, as well as the number of
passengers late for boarding. Given that most customers are unfamiliar with the airport
infrastructure and where to go, customer service is integral to improving efficiency by
encouraging customers to provide part of the solution to the problems they are creating, albeit
often unwittingly.
Focus on Airports may have begun to emerge in the late 1990s, but it has accelerated in
recent years primarily due to the growth and ease of digital communications, especially with the
near ubiquity of smartphones and tablets delivering previously unheard of access, directly to
passengers.
Improved customer experience, in particular in airport hubs, is critical for maximising
returns as well as enhancing the competitive position of such airports, owing to the rising number
of similar services. Technology-focused communication or digital communication could have a
significant positive impact on processes and activities within the airport, as well as enhance the
provision of passenger-centred services to improve satisfaction. Notably, digital communication
could have a positive impact on passenger facilitation by ensuring passengers have timely access
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 89 of 107
to information from the time of buying tickets, then throughout their journey or travel. In this
regard, digital communication can also reduce the overall time spent and costs associated with
processing customer activities.
Technology advancements provide the basis for understanding the development of digital
communication within airports and the overall impact on customer experience. For example,
Dubai International Airport has been involved in the implementation of diverse digital
communication strategies to ensure delivery of a seamless passenger experience that enables
seamless facilitation of passengers to their various destinations. The airport has implemented
way-finding apps to ensure customers can navigate their way in and outside the airport with ease.
Adoption of digital communication devices could also facilitate timely sharing of information
that reduces flight delays, idle runways and lengthy turnaround times that are detrimental to the
business prospects of an airport. Digital communications have profoundly enhanced the
efficiency in airports by promoting the implementation of technologies, such as airline
sequencing systems between ground and air personnel. Digital technologies also play a pivotal
role in ensuring that smaller airports remain open, as part of larger networks and systems.
Ultimately, the adoption of digital communication technologies is important for airlines
and airports in that they could enable smooth operations, bolster security, and manage processes,
far more cheaply and faster than the traditional methods previously used and still being used by
some airports today.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 90 of 107
5.2 Conclusion of the Research
There is little doubt that communication technologies could play an important role in
enhancing customer satisfaction and improving the quality of services delivered by airlines and
airports across the globe. For that potential to be realised, airports need to innovate, if they are to
address various problems and cater for different customer segments, as well as new and existing
airlines. For example, the use of diverse customer apps at airports can serve different classes of
customers, such as students, businessmen, and holidaymakers, thereby building a focused value
proposition for each customer segment. Through platforms such as social media, travellers can
already make enquiries on the viability of one airport over another (Chen & Batchuluun, 2015).
This capacity for data retrieval could also extend to the collection of real-time data and
information to provide insights into the specific product characteristics that appeal to each
consumer segment. As such, interactions facilitated by new communication technologies and
digital apps installed at airports could contribute to the development of previously unheard of
products and services, since it has become easier to collect data on different needs and
expectations of customers through real-time interactions between customers and marketing
personnel engaged by the airports.
Digital communication tools, however, should not be seen as a panacea to cater for
everyone. There are customer segments, such as the aged, infirm, and children, unable or
unwilling to access or operate the digital equipment. The very same people, though a minority,
could well be a major source of delays and disruptions, if there are not sufficient numbers of
trained staff on hand to guide them through the use of technology, in the first instance, or, if need
be, assist them to their destination. While the digital communication technologies could well
provide stunning solutions for the aviation industry, adoption could come at some cost for the
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 91 of 107
unwary. In order for an airport to implement a successful digital communication strategy, it must
first determine the strategic intent of such a program and implement a change management plan
with the backing of all crucial stakeholders. Most airports today have already deployed digital
communication technologies to some degree to enrich the customer experience, ranging from
smart phone apps that provide flight updates or information about retail outlets, through to online
facilities to book parking or order refreshment at restaurants.
It is reasonable to assume that adoption of and uses for new communication technologies
has barely begun and is likely to prove indispensable over time when it comes to facilitating
efficiency, speed, and customer satisfaction, not to mention help in increase the competitive
advantage of aviation businesses. This research has been effective in achieving the research
objectives as well as addressing the research questions by clearly demonstrating the impact of
digital communication in airport hubs. The research demonstrated that digital communication
impacts all aspects of airport operations, which creates the need for its adoption to enhance
customer satisfaction and performance.
5.3. Limitations of the Research
Some of the key limitations of the study involved having a small sample size which
limited the chances of making effective conclusions as well as generalizing the research results.
The research only focused on one airport thus providing specific data. Another key limitation
involved the resources used for the data such as electronic sources, time and financial resources.
Additionally, the administrative procedures also served as key limitations based on the idea that
airports administration must provide effective approvals before the research commences. As
well, some areas are restricted, affecting the effectiveness of the data collection process.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 92 of 107
5.4 Recommendations
This section presents the recommendations from the various research questions posed by
the researcher. It is clear airport hubs will need to invest in communication to stay ahead of the
competition and attract new business. The market has delivered new tools for the digital airline
to facilitate the exchange of information concerning the control of aircraft, flight details, security
alerts and the transfer of information between passengers and airlines, among a myriad of other
uses. Nonetheless, customers face a number of challenges at the airport and during the flights
that need to be addressed to maintain the customer loyalty and achieve sustainable advantage
over other airlines. Research and discussions raised a number of recommendations and
suggestions worth considering. Although the connection to passenger facilitation may not be
immediately apparent, the fact that staff and customers consider such factors highlights the
interconnected nature of aviation operations, whereby problems and solutions in one area could
have significant implications for other areas of operation.
The suggestions and recommendations discussed, included:
1. In the case of Dubai, building new terminals that are well equipped will go some
way to reduce the passenger congestion and also lower prices of the
complementary services provided to the passengers, such as accommodation and
food.
2. Technology and infrastructure investment should not, however, distract from the
value of well trained staff, capable of developing and maintaining good relations
with passengers, being positioned at strategic points of the airport. Therefore, staff
training should include practical elements of communication, how to show
courtesy to passengers, and how to present oneself when addressing a passenger.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 93 of 107
3. Governments should avoid getting involved in the airport business to avoid
discouraging the profit incentive of the organisations. The airports should be left
to carry out their activities independently with minimal regulatory intervention.
General involvement in the airport affairs aside, governments should still ensure
tight security at all times at the airport.
4. Power sources for the airport need to be reliable sources, to avoid inconveniences
due to the sudden power surges; alternative back up services should also be in
place. The airports should have modern generators that can sustain the operations
of the whole airport departments in case of power blackouts (Upadhya, 2016).
Adequate power is particularly important for airports that rely heavily on digital
technology to control operations, manage passenger flows, and provide mission
critical services, such as security.
5. Internet access should be improved to allow access at acceptable speeds for
passengers as they wait for their flights. This research has demonstrated how the
communication process overall improves the passenger experience. The hub
should consider adopting Ethernet services, since these are more reliable and
cheaper.
6. Security concerns and fear of losses due to terrorist attack should not deter
investment in various technologies. The premises need surveillance cameras
within and outside the perimeter to monitor any suspicious activities happening in
the vicinity of the airport. The same equipment could also readily be used to
monitor and control traffic flows.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 94 of 107
5.5. Contribution of the research
This research has the potential to contribute important facets of enhancing the need to
improve customer relations with relation to digital communication in the aviation industry in
general, and airport hubs in particular. Some of the major aspects that have been highlighted
include:
• The aviation industry is encouraged to invest more in the latest iterations and innovations
in digital communication, since they contribute positively towards passenger facilitation.
• The various players in the industry are encouraged to share knowledge of the digital
tools, which includes the costs and maintenance and installation, in order to help
developing regions to build aviation businesses capable of contributing to the goals and
objectives of the industry.
• The aviation industry should aware of the importance of avoiding the creation of ‘one-
size-fits-all’ services and should instead segment its customer base and use the emerging
communication tools at their disposal to address the various customer segments, which
include diverse cultures, ages, religions and abilities to use various digital tools.
• Courtesy is paramount in the aviation industry and affects the various ways in which
service to transfer passengers can be enhanced.
• This study has contributed to the knowledge of the challenges facing the passengers, as a
starting point from which the industry can move forward to implement strategies to help
eliminate those challenges.
• The managers are made aware of how the research could well contribute to decision-
making and thus improve the overall performance of the organization.
5.6. Future research
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 95 of 107
Although the sample sizes could be considered relatively small compared to the total number of
passengers experienced at a major hub, this research not only explains how digital
communications impacts passenger facilitation at hub airports with particular emphasis on
transfer passengers. It also goes some way to validating their usefulness, as well as forming a
sound foundation, observations and models on which to build further research and understanding
into how trends, theoretical models and tools could develop. Future research on the topic can
focus on expanding the research to other hub airports in order to build on the results that can help
in creating appropriate recommendations for airports across the world. Future research should
also focus on large sample size in order to enhance the generalization of the research results, as
well as effectively understanding the research issue. Additionally, future research can also focus
on understanding different ways in which stakeholders can work collaboratively towards
improving the situation in major hubs.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 96 of 107
5.5 Acknowledgements
In concluding, it would be remiss of me not to offer my sincere thanks and deep appreciation
for the generous support and exceptional guidance of my supervisors, Professor Clinton Fookes and
Professor Prasad KVD Yarlagadda.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 97 of 107
References
Adèr, H. & Mellenbergh, G. (2008). Advising on research methods: A consultant's companion.
McGraw-Hill. London.
Arif, M., Gupta, A. & Williams, A. (2013). Customer Service in the Aviation Industry- An
Exploratory Analysis of UAE Airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 32:1-
7.
Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cento, A. (2009). The airline industry: Challenges in the 21st century. (Airline industry.)
Heidelberg: Physica-Verl.
Chen, J. & Batchuluun, A. (2015). Services Innovation Impact to Customer Satisfaction and
Customer Value Enhancement in Airport. Technology in Society, 43: 219-230.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1998). The landscape of qualitative research:
Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 98 of 107
Garrett, R. (2016). Chris Runde: Helping Technology Take-off. Airport Business, 29(6): 20-
24.
Gil, N., Miozzo, M. & Massini, S. (2012). The Innovation Potential of New Infrastructure
Development: An Empirical Study of Heathrow Airport's T5 Project. Research Policy,
41(2):452-466
Goffman, E. (1989). On fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18, 123–132.
Information Resources Management Association., & Khosrow-Pour, M. (2004).Innovations
through information technology. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Jeeradist, T., Thawesaengskulthai, N. & Sangsuwan, T. (2016). Using TRIZ to Enhance
Passengers' Perceptions of an Airline's Image through Service Quality and Safety.
Journal of Air Transport Management, 53: 131-139.
Kalakou, S. & Psaraki-Kalouptsidi, V. (2015). Future Airport Terminals: New Technologies
Promise Capacity Gains. Journal of Air Transport Management, 42: 203-212.
Ku, E. & Chen, C. (2016). Fitting Facilities to Self-Service Technology Usage: Evidence from
Kiosks in Taiwan Airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 32: 87-94.
Kramer, L. S., Bothner, A., Spiro, M., National Research Council (U.S.)., Airport Cooperative
Research Program,, & United States. (2013). How airports measure customer service
performance: A synthesis of airport practice.
Kothari, C. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
Chicago.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 99 of 107
Lee, Y. & Park, J. (2016). Impact of a Sustainable Brand on Improving Business Performance
of Airport Enterprises: The Case of Incheon International Airport. Journal of Air
Transport Management, 53: 46-53.
Lewis-Beck, M. (2005). Data Analysis: An introduction. Sage publications. New York.
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Martin-Domingo, L. & Martín, J. (2016). Airport Mobile Internet and Innovation. Journal of
Air Transport Management, 55:102-112.
Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
May, T. (Ed.) (2002). Qualitative research in action. Thousand
Neuman, W. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Praeger.
New York.
Padrón, S., Guimarans, D. & Ramos, J. (2016). A Bi-Objective Approach for Scheduling
Ground-Handling Vehicles in Airports. Computers and Operations Research, 71: 34-
53.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 100 of 107
Phillips, S. (2016). New Technologies Simplify the Airport Experience. Airport Business,
30(5):18-22.
Pigni, F. & Piccoli, G. (2016). Digital Data Streams: Creating Value from the Real-Time Flow
of Big Data. California Management Review, 58(3): 5-25.
Popovic, V., Kraal, B., & Kirk, P. J. (2010). Towards airport passenger experience models.
In Proceedings of 7th international conference on design & emotion.
Ritchie, J. R. B., & Crouch, G. I. (2003). The competitive destination: A sustainable tourism
perspective. Oxon [u.a.: CABI Pub.
Scherer, A., Wünderlich, N. & von Wangenheim, F. (2015). The Value of Self-Service: Long-
Term Effects of Technology-Based Self-Service Usage on Customer Retention. MIS
Quarterly, 39(1): 177-200.
Skorupski, J. & Uchroński, P. (2016). Managing the Process of Passenger Security Control at
an Airport Using the Fuzzy Inference System. Expert Systems with Applications, 54:
284-293.
Straker, K. & Wrigley, C. (2016). Translating Emotional Insights into Digital Channel
Designs. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Technology, 7(2): 135-157.
Schwartz, V. (2014). Dimanche a Orly: The Jet-Age Airport and the Spectacle of Technology
between Sky and Earth. French Politics. Culture and Society, 32(3): 24.
Upadhya, V. (2016).Airport Transformation through Digital Passenger Experience. Airport
Business, 30(4): 38-41.
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 101 of 107
Widarsyah, R (2013). The impact of airport service quality dimension on overall airport
experience and impression. UNVL Capstones, paper 1906
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 102 of 107
Appendix I
Respondent questionnaire
Section A
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. What is your gender?
(a) Male
(b) Female
2. What is your age bracket?
(a) 20-29
(b) 30-39
(c) 40-49
(d) 50 and above
3. For how many years have you worked in this company?
(a) 3-9 years
(b) 10-19 years
(c) 21-29 years
(d) Above 30 years
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 103 of 107
Section B
4. In your own opinion, what is the biggest challenge facing the passenger facilitation
process in the Dubai International Airport?
Challenge Frequency Average rating
Government intervention in airport operations.
Lack of specialized employees to take care of special needs
Low internet access in the airport
Passenger traffic
Constant power surges
Environmental conditions
Insecurity
Inadequate technology
Sustainability of competitive advantage
Flight mismanagement
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 104 of 107
5. What do you think are the major aspects of poor communication of passengers
connecting through hubs?
Opinion Strongl
y agree
Agree Neutr
al
Disagr
ee
Strongly
disagree
Average
rating
Contributes to dissatisfaction
and unpleasantness of
passengers
Non-optimization of airport
resources
Reduced airport and airline
efficiency and performance
Increase in passenger traffic
6. What are the main impacts of digital communication on passenger facilitation?
Opinions Strongly
agree
agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
Increase in security
assurance due to
improved security
Reduced flight
delays due to
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 105 of 107
managed flights
Streamlined
operations
Saves money leading
to low cost tickets.
7. Which are the best ways to communicate with customers before arriving and within
the airport?
Method of
communication
Strongly
agree
agree neutral disagree Strongly
disagree
Number
of
responses
Institutional
boards
Mobile phones
brochures
Flight
attendants
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 106 of 107
8. What is the overall response of digital communication in addressing passenger
facilitation from customers?
Opinion
Positive response
Negative response
How can communication between airlines and transfer passengers be improved?
Place a tick where appropriate.
(a) Enhance customer communication skills in terms of choice of words, tone and etiquette
to the transfer passengers ( )
(b) Provide complementary services like free food and drink at the airport for the transfer
passengers as they await their flights to arrive ( )
(c) Give discounted tickets to the transfer passengers or ensure that the ticket prices are fair
for their remaining part of the journey ( )
(d) Ensure that communication of delays or security threats reach the passengers on time. ( )
(e) Accommodate any type of passenger with regard to any special requirements. ( )
(f) Improve communication between airlines to enhance the timely communication of
transfer passenger details. ( )
Digital Communications at Hub Airports Page 107 of 107
How can the Dubai hub establish the most effective way to maximize returns while
increasing customer satisfaction and experience? Tick where appropriate
Opinion tick
Enhance the digital machinery ………………
Add the number of terminals ……………..
Alliances, mergers and takeovers ………………
Widening the route networks …………….
Achieving a low cost of operation …………….
Investing in modern aircrafts ……………….