Hovav Nechushtan Hadassah Hebrew University Medical center

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Hovav Nechushtan Hadassah Hebrew University Medical center
  • Slide 2
  • Currently we are not curing stage 4 cancer the approach of one cure fits all does not seem to work Perhaps a new general drug is on the horizon but most of us are skeptic.. I will describe in this short lecture some case reports which illustrate our hopes and also current shortcomings
  • Slide 3
  • Median Survival Survival NDeaths(Months)1-Year2-Year 1 CBDCA+Pac208159838%15% CDDP+Vin202156836%16% 0612182430 Months 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% SWOG 9509: PC vs VC Overall Survival 1 J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3210-3218. 2 JNCI. 2000;92:1074-1080. 3 Lung Cancer. 2000;27(3):145-157. 2 BSC78 71528% 1% 3 BSC70 704.615% 0% Platinum Based Doublet HR=0.76
  • Slide 4
  • Have We Approached the Ceiling for Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC? Schiller et. al., NEJM 2002 MST ~ 8 mos.
  • Slide 5
  • Bevacizumab -based therapy extends survival beyond historical benchmark of 1 year 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 06121824303642 Duration of survival (months) OS estimate Sandler, et al. NEJM 2006 E4599 overall patient population CP (n=444) Avastin 15mg/kg + CP (n=434) HR (95% CI) 0.79 (0.670.92) p value0.003 Median OS (months)10.312.3 10.3 CP (n=444) Avastin 15mg/kg + CP (n=434) HR (95% CI) 0.79 (0.670.92) p value0.003 Median OS (months)10.312.3
  • Slide 6
  • Pemetrexed in Breast Cancer Clinical Response by Baseline TS mRNA % responders N=34N=17
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • FIGURE 3. KaplanMeier plots of PFS (A) and OS (B) in patients with low and high nuclear TS expression (H- score) (n = 60). High and low TS immunohistochemical expression in the nucleus: TS nucleus H-score less than 70 and more than or equal to 70, respectively. OS, overall survival, PFS, progression-free survival; TS, thymidylate synthase. Copyright 2013 Journal of Thoracic Oncology. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.8 Thymidylate Synthase Expression and Outcome of Patients Receiving Pemetrexed for Advanced Nonsquamous NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer in a Prospective Blinded Assessment Phase II Clinical Trial Thymidylate Synthase Expression and Outcome of Patients Receiving Pemetrexed for Advanced Nonsquamous NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer in a Prospective Blinded Assessment Phase II Clinical Trial Nicolson, Marianne C.; Fennell, Dean A.; Ferry, David; OByrne, Kenneth; Shah, Riyaz; Potter, Vanessa; Skailes, Geraldine; Upadhyay, Sunil; Taylor, Paul; Andr, Valerie; Nguyen, Tuan S.; Myrand, Scott P.; Visseren- Grul, Carla; Das, Mayukh; Kerr, Keith M. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 8(7):930-939, July 2013. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318292c500
  • Slide 9
  • Overall Survival in Pts with Adenocarcinoma or Large Cell Ca. Overall Survival for all Pts HR=0.81 Approved in US by FDA in 10/08 for non-squamous ca
  • Slide 10
  • FIGURE 4. Utility of routine IHC markers to identify putative NR and R to Pemetrexed therapy. The expression of eight IHC markers in 68 of 90 NSCLC and two normal lung tissues (G0) was detected by TMA and used for cluster analysis. High staining is shown in red and low staining is shown in green. Failed IHC staining is shown in purple. NSCLC cases are annotated with predominantly present expression profile-assigned subgroup(s) (G1 to G6) on the right and predicted Pemetrexed responsiveness (resistant case [NR]: gray; sensitive case [R]: orange) on the left. IHC, immunohistochemistry; NR, nonresponder; R, responder; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer. Copyright 2012 Journal of Thoracic Oncology. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.10 Expression Profiling-Based Subtyping Identifies Novel Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Subgroups and Implicates Putative Resistance to Pemetrexed Therapy Expression Profiling-Based Subtyping Identifies Novel Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Subgroups and Implicates Putative Resistance to Pemetrexed Therapy Hou, Jun; Lambers, Margaretha; den Hamer, Bianca; den Bakker, Michael A.; Hoogsteden, Henk C.; Grosveld, Frank; Hegmans, Joost; Aerts, Joachim; Philipsen, Sjaak Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 7(1):105- 114, January 2012. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182352a45
  • Slide 11
  • Main approaches semi- available today 1) Find expression of a small number of markers ( usually derived from enzymatic markers ) for tailoring the right chemo ( arrays not yet available) 2) Find the gene for which there is oncogene addiction and target it ! 3) Find the overactive signal transduction pathways and target them 4)Utilize alternative approaches such as vaccines/cytokine inhibitors etx 5) Use animal models!
  • Slide 12
  • a non smoker ! 57yr old -woman Alcian blue - - .CK5/6+, P63+, TTF-1+(on some cells ) Favoring SCC
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • NOT relevant anymore >>>>!
  • Slide 18
  • Relevance of circulating biomarkers for the therapy monitoring and follow-up investigations in patients with non- small cell lung cancer. Barak V, Holdenrieder S, Nisman B, Stieber P Barak VHoldenrieder SNisman BStieber P Int J Biol Markers. 2012 Jul 19;27(2):e139-46. doi: 10.5301/JBM.2012.9141. Int J Biol Markers. Cytokeratin-19 fragments, nucleosomes and neuron-specific enolase as early measures of chemotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer. Alm El-Din MA, Farouk G, Nagy H, Abd Elzaher A, Abo El-Magd GH Alm El-Din MAFarouk GNagy HAbd Elzaher A Abo El-Magd GH .
  • Slide 19
  • described by Rossel Seems to predict ddp response May predict response to taxanes
  • Slide 20
  • Cyfra 21-1 reduced to normal levels from being more than x20 of normal Ca125 reduced from over 3000 to around 100
  • Slide 21
  • A term coined by the late IB Weinstein Describes a situation whereby the tumor is still addicted to an overactivity of a specific oncogene Some impressing successes yet up to now Resistance has nearly always appeared Still the whole concept is very appealing
  • Slide 22
  • An Evolving View of Adenocarcinoma KRAS 1999 Pending EGFR BRAF PIK3CA EML4-ALK FGFR4 HER2 2009
  • Slide 23
  • 69 yr old male Light smoker from a perypheral town in Israel a clerk on pension After first line taxane and carbo After brain irradiation Tumor progressing -2010 at that time Only around 50 patients have been reported in prelimenary reports of Crizotinib in ALK translocated patients
  • Slide 24
  • Pre-Treatment (FLT-PET) Pre-Treatment (FLT-PET) After 4 weeks of PF-02341066 After 4 weeks of PF-02341066 43 yo Male Non-Smoker with NSCLC positive for ALK 43 yo Male Non-Smoker with NSCLC positive for ALK
  • Slide 25
  • Tumor Responses to PF-02341066, In NSCLC with ALK fusion
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • 45 yr old non smoker Will describe here only a few aspects of his very complex story
  • Slide 28
  • cadherin Translation kinesin coiled coil tyrosine kinase a) RET KIF5B b) KIF5B (exons 16-25) RET (exons 1-11) KIF5B (exons 1-15) RET (exons 12-20) ATG 32,316,377 bps Not Expressed Expressed Figure 3. (a) Schematic representation of the 11,294,741 bp inversion in NSCLC (TEVA) that generates an in-frame KIF5B-RET gene fusion (not to scale). The inverted region of chromosome 10 starts at 32,316,377 bps (within KIF5B intron 15) and ends at 43,611,118 bps (within RET intron 11). (b) Protein domain structure of the RET-KIF5B and KIF5B-RET gene fusions. The cadherin domain of RET is included in the predicted RET-KIF5B protein. The kinesin and coiled coil domains of KIF5B and the tyrosine kinase domain of RET are included in the KIF5B-RET fusion protein. RT-PCR of primer designed to RET exon 11 and KIF5B exon 16 yielded no product. RT-PCR of primer designed to KIF5B exon 15 and RET exon 12 yielded a strong product (data not shown). 43,611,118 bps KIF5B-RETRET-KIF5B ATG break
  • Slide 29
  • Foundation test on recurrent disease Foundation test on recurrent disease reveal two additional gene mutations
  • Slide 30
  • SURGERY FIRST ROUND PATIENT EXPANSIONTREATMENT TUMORGRAFT RESECTION RECOVERY ENGRAFTME NT
  • Slide 31
  • The Tenth Annual Rose Lippin Memorial Lecture
  • Slide 32
  • Slide 33
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER Genomic Alterations PIK3CA E545K PTEN L108R KRAS G12D
  • Slide 36
  • There is a phase 1 trial combining PI3K inhibitor with MEK Not in Israel did not answer us ( perhaps we could have tried harder) So we made our combination sorafenib for kras and everolimus for mtor/PI3 K inhibition Suffers from pneumonia responds to antibiotics See ct
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • ( not our patients MRI)
  • Slide 39
  • perhaps our therapy led to the spreading of new and eventually lethal brain mets or At least was inactive in the brain A reccurent theme our therapies are not nave and induce sometime unpredicted tumor responses Are the drugs we use really doing their job?
  • Slide 40
  • Slide 41
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Patient # KRAS EGFR ALK RET ERBB2ERBB3 BRAF MET FGFR1FGFR3 PIK3CA PTEN STK11 TP53 MDM2 CDKN2A IRS2 NF1NF2 RICTOR RB1 SMARCA4 CCND1 AKT2 CDK4CDK6 MCL1 SMO SETD2 ATM BRCA1 MYC ARID1A NKX2-1 APC TRF030988 TRF007647 TRF022193 TRF008156 1062100090 TRF008233 TRF016770 1062101946 1068114714 TRF001268 TRF024905 TRF024258 TRF006835 TRF023354 1062103183 TRF023276 TRF019106 TRF012071 TRF006563 1062103208 1062102328 TRF027765 TRF013044 1062102348 TRF009387 TRF021429 TRF018325 TRF004067 TRF016919 TRF000912 TRF032525 TRF004880 TRF001283 TRF001278 TRF009265 Patient 4 TRF011288 TRF014829 Patient 1 TRF009974 TRF033763 TRF010706 TRF012595 1062102282 TRF032297 TRF015690 TRF005420 TRF023597 1062100089 TRF032494 TRF000995 TRF000919 TRF004997 1068115659 TRF023590 1068116141 TRF031880 TRF014753 TRF008225 17154542331142632581114831141512111433 29%26%7%9%7%3%5% 2% 7%3%10%55%9%14%2% 7%14%5%2% 7%2%9%2%3%2% 7%5% 43 ONCOTEST Substitution/Inde l Gene amplification Gene deletion Truncation Gene fusion
  • Slide 44
  • Patient # KRAS ERBB3 MET PIK3CA PTEN STK11 TP53 MDM2 CDKN2A RICTOR SMARC A4 CDK4 MCL1 BRCA1 MYC ARID1A NKX2-1 CDKN2B TRF030988 TRF007647 TRF022193 TRF008156 1062100090 TRF008233 TRF016770 1062101946 1068114714 TRF001268 TRF024905 TRF024258 TRF006835 TRF023354 1062103183 TRF023276 TRF019106 Substitution/Inde l Gene amplification Gene deletion Truncation Gene fusion
  • Slide 45
  • Patient # KRAS ERBB3 MET PIK3CA PTEN STK11 TP53 MDM2 CDKN2A RICTOR SMARCA4 CDK4 MCL1 BRCA1 MYC ARID1A NKX2-1 CDKN2B TRF023354 TRF006835 TRF019106 TRF008233 TRF001268 TRF024258 1062103183 TRF022193 TRF007647 TRF023276 TRF024905 TRF030988 TRF008156 1062100090 TRF016770 1062101946 1068114714 Substitution/Inde l Gene amplification Gene deletion Truncation Gene fusion
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
  • lkb1 genetic modifiers of therapeutic response. Nature 2012
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • Kras;Luc (Kluc), Kras;Lkb1L/L;Luc (KLluc), or Kras;p53L/L; Luc (KPluc) mice
  • Slide 50
  • Patient # KRAS EGFR ALK RET ERBB2ERBB3 BRAF MET FGFR1FGFR3 PIK3CA PTEN STK11 TP53 MDM2 CDKN2A IRS2 NF1NF2 RICTOR RB1 SMARCA4 CCND1 AKT2 CDK4CDK6 MCL1 SMO SETD2 ATM BRCA1 MYC ARID1A NKX2-1 APC TRF030988 TRF007647 TRF022193 TRF008156 1062100090 TRF008233 TRF016770 1062101946 1068114714 TRF001268 TRF024905 TRF024258 TRF006835 TRF023354 1062103183 TRF023276 TRF019106 TRF012071 TRF006563 1062103208 1062102328 TRF027765 TRF013044 1062102348 TRF009387 TRF021429 TRF018325 TRF004067 TRF016919 TRF000912 TRF032525 TRF004880 TRF001283 TRF001278 TRF009265 Patient 4 TRF011288 TRF014829 Patient 1 TRF009974 TRF033763 TRF010706 TRF012595 1062102282 TRF032297 TRF015690 TRF005420 TRF023597 1062100089 TRF032494 TRF000995 TRF000919 TRF004997 1068115659 TRF023590 1068116141 TRF031880 TRF014753 TRF008225 17154542331142632581114831141512111433 29%26%7%9%7%3%5% 2% 7%3%10%55%9%14%2% 7%14%5%2% 7%2%9%2%3%2% 7%5% 50 ONCOTEST Substitution/Inde l Gene amplification Gene deletion Truncation Gene fusion
  • Slide 51
  • Epidemiologic Characteristics and Therapeutic Perspectives Julien Mazie`res, Solange Peters, Benoit Lepage, Alexis B. Cortot, Fabrice Barlesi, Michele Beau- Faller, Benjamin Besse, Hele`ne Blons, Audrey Mansuet- Lupo, Thierry Urban, Denis Moro-Sibilot, Eric Dansin, Christos Chouaid, Marie Wislez, Joachim Diebold, Enriqueta Felip, Isabelle Rouquette, Julie D. Milia, and Oliver Gautschi Jco 7-2013
  • Slide 52
  • Slide 53
  • Slide 54
  • Garraway and colleagues did full exome seq on 180 lung cancer samples No HER2 mutations!!! Perhaps not critical as a driver mutation .
  • Slide 55
  • Slide 56
  • Specifically, we observed a DCR of 93% for trastuzumab-based therapies (n = 15) and a DCR of 100% for afatinib (n = 3) but no response to other HER2-targeted drugs (n = 3). Progression-free survival for patients with HER2 therapies was 5
  • Slide 57
  • Slide 58
  • Slide 59
  • Slide 60
  • 42 yr old non smoker Severe aspirin induced asthma Previously treated with anti IGE antibodies
  • Slide 61
  • Diagnosis with large lung mass Small brain met Several small liver mets Bone met
  • Slide 62
  • Avastin alimta carbo Feels better less cough Abdominal abcess probably microperforation Slowly got better Brain irradaition radiosurgery only
  • Slide 63
  • Irreversible inhibitor Available in Israel Used in this group of patients Started on full dose although there was the microperforation
  • Slide 64
  • Was feeling ok But MRI multiple brain mets Body less uptake but some tumors did grow bigger So We moved him to herceptin + afatinib (Her2 staining in tumor very low)
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Slide 67
  • Slide 68
  • A non smoker 70 yr old Metastatic Adenocarcinoma PR to Alimta +carbo Due to proteinuria we did not start with avastin After 4 cycles a major CVA Treated with TPA After rehab started again alimta
  • Slide 69
  • Stabilizes under the new treatment A few bone met and lung tumor General condition got much better No biopsy available so he was sent for a new biopsy Very small sample so we did not send for ALK but for Foundation
  • Slide 70
  • Slide 71
  • Is this a bona fide driver mutation ? Not sure Can treatment with HER2 inhibitors help? Probably but might depend on the patient and some characterization of the patients other mutations might help So definetly a drug target in NSCLC but results are probably less exiting than those with EGFR mutations
  • Slide 72
  • The Kras story is important represents a large part of our NSCLC patients And the other mutations we note can probably ( no one checked in humans) greatly influence the tumor response HER2 story again complex perhaps also greatly influenced by other driver mutations? So we are left with many questions but would like to present new possibilities to our patients
  • Slide 73