Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Housing Association CX A study of the pre-agent calling experience for residents
2
Introduction
With the public inquiry into the Grenfell Tower fire still ongoing, UK Housing
Associations have never been more in the spotlight. In this study, we aimed to
explore how committed a selection of the UK’s largest Housing Associations are in
delivering a great pre-agent caller experience.
We called 30 of the largest Housing Associations in the UK, with a range of caller scenarios
typically experienced by Housing Associations.
We assessed the pre-agent caller journey focusing on the IVR from welcome messages to
routing, in-queue content, scripting and caller waiting times; we scored every Housing
Association at each point based on our extensive knowledge of best practice to achieve
a great Customer Experience.
Over the course of our research, we found that most housing associations do well in
certain aspects of the journey, but overall most offer a poor pre-agent caller experience.
Of those that addressed each of the key parts of the journey the differences in
comparison with other Housing Associations were dramatic. This report details our
methods, our analysis, and our insights. Here are just a few of our top-level findings…...
■ 90% of Housing Associations called had an IVR
■ Only 48% of those had professionally recorded IVR messaging
■ All Housing Associations surveyed had some level of in-queue experience (where we
were placed in a queue)
■ 37% had scripting that we felt was conversational and “human sounding”
■ Only 13% avoided common telephony clichés in their scripting
3
Methodology For our study sample, we selected 30 of the largest Housing Associations across the
UK based on publicly available social housing stock figures:
A2Dominion
Aster Group
Bromford
Clarion Housing Group
Derwent Living
Gentoo Group
Glasgow Housing Association
Home Group
Liverty
London & Quadrant (L&Q)
Metropolitan
Midland Heart
Notting Hill Genesis
Optivo
Orbit Group
Peabody Housing Association
Places for People
Sanctuary Housing Association
Southern Housing Group
Sovereign Housing Association
Stonewater
The Guinness Partnership
The Hyde Group
The Riverside Group
Thirteen Group
VIVID
Wakefield and District Housing
Waterloo Housing Group
WM Housing Group
Your Housing Group
The map shows the approximate
location of the registered office
address for each Housing
Association.
4
Our study focuses on the 3 key components of a call…
In-Queue
Scripting
IVR
Audio Scripting
Knowing how we speak to our customers is just as important as what we say to them.
But we’re not just talking about agent responses. The need for precise, well positioned
and scripted wording in IVR menu, and in-queue messages is often totally overlooked…
and this means that aggravating clichés such as “your call is important to us” are still far
too common.
To assess the quality and effectiveness of each Housing Association’s scripting, we
looked for adherence to best practice (e.g. removing “www.” from web addresses),
the number of topics per message, tone of voice, the avoidance of clichés, and
unnecessary repetition.
IVR Routing
The Interactive Voice Response system
(IVR) is the gatekeeper for incoming calls
– it matches each customer with the
right agent. But if designed poorly, it
obstructs and frustrates callers.
Guided by our Best Practice principles,
we graded IVR menus across 11 different
categories. These included the number
of initial menu options and subsequent
layers, audio quality and overall design.
Where there was no initial IVR
menu, we have removed
those Housing Associations
from this section of the
study. This was to avoid
unfairly skewing the
results against Housing
Associations without
IVRs, as we were still
able to get through
to an agent.
In-Queue Experience
The “in-queue” space is one of the most
difficult parts of a call to get right. Do a
good job here, and the caller is kept
calm and entertained while they wait
to speak to someone. Get it wrong,
and the experience can be intensely
irritating creating a bad first impression
and leading to costly call drop-outs.
We’ve been telephony specialists for
over two decades. So, to judge each
Housing Association, we assessed
criteria including volume
consistency and
appropriateness,
message variety, music
quality (e.g. default
“system music” or
inappropriate genres)
and abrupt messages
that cut in without any
fades... or even worse:
silences, engaged
tones, or no queue
facility at all!
5
Summary of key findings from our study…
IVR Routing
The good news is that all the Housing Associations audited had a welcome message and
that 90% had an IVR menu. Welcome messages provide the immediate reassurance that
a caller has contacted the desired organisation. IVR menus are not appropriate for every
organisation but represent opportunities for more efficient call handling and the
deployment of deflection and informational messaging.
Less than half of the IVR messages were professionally recorded. Whilst in-house options
are functional, they are very rarely on-brand and generally have poor audio quality. At
best this can impact brand credibility and at worst, poor quality audio can leave callers
confused and frustrated about which option to choose. This can often be the first
impression of the organisation for a caller and poor audio quality and confusing badly
scripted options that are off brand can have a detrimental effect on the caller’s
perception.
Less than a quarter included a navigational option to take the caller back to the main
menu if they needed to. This can cause frustration if there are lots of layers to the IVR
tree.
In-Queue
Two-thirds of the Housing Associations we looked at had a consistent and appropriate
queue call volume. Lack of attention to this can often result in large rates of call
abandonment due to the caller not wanting to listen to something so loud or so quiet for
what could be a reasonably long amount of time.
Of the Housing Associations using in-queue music 57% were brand appropriate while only
38% had professionally recorded messages. Of the messages we heard, three-quarters of
Housing Associations used deflection messages directing their callers to self-serve on their
websites and two-thirds had comfort messages. However, only 10% featured a fully
mixed production.
Audio Scripting
We looked at the use of scripting in the IVR and in-queue. The stand out result of this
section was that only 13% of Housing Associations managed to avoid all the telephony
clichés. While 60% managed to keep to one topic per message, only 20% of the messages
were varied. Finally, in our opinion only 37% of messages sounded authentically
conversational.
The combination of these factors weighs heavily towards potentially damaging call
abandonment or to callers reaching agents in a frustrated or hostile state of mind.
Scripting is a lot harder to get right than most people think. A lot of what we heard had
been scripted and recorded in house, and unless you have a professional contact centre
script writer, then you are only going to achieve a low-quality recording of confusing IVR
options.
6
IVR Routing
The chart below shows the overall scores for IVR routing.
All the Housing Associations with IVRs scored well for their IVR. Scoring was based on:
■ The presence of a welcome message
■ The number of options in the initial IVR menu
■ How many layers there were in the IVR tree
■ IVR messaging content
■ Audio quality
One Housing Association – Home Group – scored 100% while none scored lower than 64%.
Three of the 30 Housing Associations that we called – Thirteen Group, Stonewater and
Bromford – only had a welcome message with no subsequent IVR menu, so have been
excluded from the IVR analysis.
A2Dominion
Aster Group
Clarion Housing Group
Derwent Liv ing
Gentoo Group
Glasgow Housing Association
Home Group
Liverty
London and Quadrant (L&Q)
Metropolitan
Midland Heart
Notting Hill Genesis
Optivo
Orbit Group
Peabody Housing Association
Places for People
Sanctuary Housing Association
Southern Housing Group
Sovereign Housing Association
The Guinness Partnership
The Hyde Group
The Riverside Group
Viv id
Wakefield and District Housing
Waterloo Housing Group
WM Housing Group
Your Housing Group
Highest score: 100%
Lowest score: 64%
Average score: 80%
7
In-Queue
The chart below shows the overall scores for in-queue experience.
When calling 9 of the 30 Housing Associations, we experienced a queuing time of less than
12 seconds. These have been excluded from this analysis as it was impossible to fairly
assess the in-queue experience.
Of the remaining 21 Housing Associations: all had an in-queue experience. The majority
include music and/or messaging (86% and 90% respectively), but only 10% had a fully
mixed production.
Two-thirds of the Housing Associations audited scored less than half for their queues.
Clarion Housing Group
Bromford
Clarion Housing Group
Derwent Liv ing
Gentoo Group
London and Quadrant (L&Q)
Metropolitan
Midland Heart
Notting Hill Genesis
Orbit Group
Peabody Housing Association
Places for People
Sanctuary Housing Association
Southern Housing Group
Sovereign Housing Association
Stonewater
The Guinness Partnership
The Riverside Group
Wakefield and District Housing
Waterloo Housing Group
WM Housing Group
Highest score: 80%
Lowest score: 27%
Average score: 49%
8
Audio Scripting
The chart shows the overall scores for scripting.
Calls were scored based on use of language contractions, avoidance of clichés,
compliance of scripting rules and humanisation of script.
Here we see that an overwhelming majority of Housing Associations are scoring 50% or
below. This suggests that scripting is poor and fails to engage callers. This can frustrate the
customer which can decrease satisfaction levels and can often be a cause of
abandonment.
This means that nearly all Housing Associations are not getting the value that a well
scripted IVR and In-queue messaging implementation has to offer.
A2Dominion
Aster Group
Bromford
Clarion Housing Group
Derwent Liv ing
Gentoo Group
Glasgow Housing Association
Home Group
Liverty
London and Quadrant (L&Q)
Metropolitan
Midland Heart
Notting Hill Genesis
Optivo
Orbit Group
Peabody Housing Association
Places for People
Sanctuary Housing Association
Southern Housing Group
Sovereign Housing Association
Stonewater
The Guinness Partnership
The Hyde Group
The Riverside Group
Thirteen Group
Viv id
Wakefield and District Housing
Waterloo Housing Group
WM Housing Group
Your Housing Group
Highest score: 83%
Lowest score: 0%
Average score: 29%
9
Further statistics highlighted by our study…
IVR Routing
■ Housing Associations that use a branded welcome message: 100%
■ Housing Associations that have an IVR menu: 90%
Of which:
■ Proportion of professionally recorded IVRs: 48%
■ Percentage of IVRs containing a single voice artist: 93%
■ Proportion that presented high quality audio: 63%
■ Percentage that did not include navigation options in the menu: 78%
■ Average number of layers of options before getting through to an agent: 2
■ Average time in IVR: 47 seconds
In-Queue*
■ Housing Associations with an in-queue experience: 100%
■ In-Queue experiences that included music: 86%
➢ 67% of these were brand appropriate
■ In-Queue experiences that included messaging: 90%
➢ 42% of these were professionally recorded
■ Proportion of mixed productions used in-queue (i.e. messaging and music in the same
file, with no cutting in or out): 10%
■ Average time in-queue: 2 minutes 15 seconds
Audio Scripting
■ Housing Associations that avoided repetition in their menus and messaging: 23%
■ Proportion that failed to avoid cliché phrases: 87%
■ Percentage that had ‘humanised’ their messages: 37%
■ Proportion that kept to a single topic per message: 60%
* where we queued for more than 12 seconds
10
Housing Associations: League Table
Our top scorers display stronger scores across the metrics, reflecting a holistic approach to
their pre-agent caller experience. By contrast, mid-ranked Housing Associations can score
highly on the basic structure of their IVR but have neglected the in-queue experience and
overall scripting. Scripting was a notable weak point for the majority of Housing
Associations. Repetition of language and messages added to tired clichés are key drivers
of caller frustration. These lead to increases in the negative results of undesirable call
abandonment and fractious caller-agent interactions.
Rank Total Supplier IVR IN-QUEUE SCRIPTING
1 81% Wakefield and District Housing 91% 73% 83%
2 75% The Guinness Partnership 82% 80% 50%
3 69% Gentoo Group 82% 67% 50%
4 66% Metropolitan 91% 60% 33%
5 63% Derwent Living 73% 53% 67%
6= 59% Clarion Housing Group 91% 47% 33%
6= 59% Waterloo Housing Group 82% 53% 33%
6= 59% Notting Hill Genesis 73% 60% 33%
9= 56% London and Quadrant (L&Q) 91% 47% 17%
9= 56% The Riverside Group 91% 47% 17%
9= 56% Peabody Housing Association 91% 40% 33%
9= 56% Places for People 91% 40% 33%
9= 56% A2Dominion 82% 40% 50%
14= 50% Sanctuary Housing Association 73% 47% 17%
14= 50% Sovereign Housing Association 73% 47% 17%
16= 44% Home Group 100% 0%^ 50%
16= 44% WM Housing Group 64% 40% 17%
18= 41% Southern Housing Group 73% 33% 0%
18= 41% Your Housing Group 73% 33%^ 0%
18= 41% Orbit Group 73% 27% 17%
18= 41% Glasgow Housing Association 73% 13%^ 50%
18= 41% Midland Heart 64% 33% 17%
23= 38% Optivo 91% 0%^ 33%
23= 38% The Hyde Group 82% 0%^ 50%
25 34% Stonewater 27%* 47% 17%
26= 30% Aster Group 64% 20%^ 0%
26= 30% Bromford 18%* 40% 33%
28 28% Liverty 82% 0%^ 0%
29 25% Vivid 55% 0%^ 33%
30 16% Thirteen Group 9%* 27%^ 0%
* No IVR after welcome message – rating is for welcome message only ^ Queueing time of <12 seconds – rating is based on anything we heard during this period
11
Further information about this report
Metadata
The conclusions of this study were compiled using over 1,000 individual data points.
We recorded over 5.5 hours of raw audio during the auditing process.
Our Approach
All numbers dialled were customer service numbers most apparent on each Housing
Association’s website, as we believe callers will call the first customer service number they
come across.
The study was designed as per Premier CX’s Best Practice principles, which form the basis
of our consultancy services.
Every call was individually audited by a Senior Consultant.
All calls were audited from the original, unedited audio as recorded during the calling
process.
All calls were made over a 2-week period in July/August 2018.
Best-In-Class
We define a Best-In-Class telephony offering as one that gives equal focus to all aspects
of a call and puts the needs of the customer at the heart of every design decision. This
means that the scripting of the option menus is just as important as having those menus
professionally recorded and calls routed correctly to the agents.
12
More on Premier CX
At Premier, we’ve spent over 20 years specialising in customer contact
experience.
We are an independent creative consultancy specialising in helping contact centres
optimise their customer experience across all channels. We work across all contact centre
touchpoints to reduce user effort, create brand consistency and improve customer
satisfaction.
Trusted by over 350 of the UK’s biggest brands; our award-winning strategic approach
seeks to streamline communication, creating a seamless and positive experience that is at
once creative, clear and on-brand.
Our work has a direct, tangible impact on contact centre performance, customer
experience and brand reputation enhancing interactions.
Our CX services
■ Audio Branding / Marketing
■ IVR Design
■ FAQ Videos
■ CX Consultancy
13
Find out more…
Kevin O’Connor
Director of Contact Centre Sales
Kirsty Ferguson
Executive Assistant to Sales Director
Premier CX
Laverstoke Grange
Whitchurch
RG28 7PF
+44 (0)345 071 1359
premiercx.co.uk
Confidentiality and Copyright
© Premier CX is a trading name of Premier Business Audio Ltd. All information contained in this document, including any attachments is confidential, and provided solely for the eyes of the intended recipient. Neither the document, nor any part of it may be used for any other purpose, reproduced, published, disclosed or passed on to a third party without the permission of Premier Business Audio Ltd. These obligations shall not apply to information that is or becomes in the public domain legitimately from any source other than Premier Business Audio Ltd. Many of the products, services and names included in the document are trademarks, registered or otherwise. Such trademarks are all acknowledged.