HOSEA Et Al 2011 Corrected

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 HOSEA Et Al 2011 Corrected

    1/5

    Corresponding author: [email protected]; +2348033119599

    *1Iliya HA and 2Hawksworth GM

    1Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, Aberdeen, UK (New address: Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of

    Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Jos, Nigeria)2Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, Aberdeen, UK

    Abstract

    Clearance of salicylic acid is extremely sensitive to changes in urine pH. When the urine pH is increased, there

    is an increase in renal clearance and this has been exploited in the use of sodium bicarbonate in salicylate

    poisoning. The pharmacokinetics of an orally administered dose of aspirin with, and without sodium bicarbonate

    was studied on the relationship between urinary pH and salicylic acid excretion in two volunteers. High

    Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) method was utilized to determine the levels of salicylic acid inplasma and in urine. The results showed that the volunteer who was administered an oral dose of aspirin with

    sodium bicarbonate had a different pharmacokinetics data from the volunteer administered an oral dose of

    aspirin without sodium bicarbonate. The ingestion of bicarbonate with aspirin increased renal clearance of

    salicylic acid from 2.88 ml/min to 15.06 ml/min. The bicarbonate raises the pH of the urine and this increases

    the renal excretion of free salicylate resulting in lowering of plasma salicylate levels. The control of urinary pH

    in studies of pharmacokinetics is, thus, vital as urinary pH can be important in determining drug toxicity moredirectly. Results obtained indicated that HPLC can be used for separation of salicylates and their metabolites

    and the technique can be applied in human bioavailability studies.

    Key words: Aspirin; sodium bicarbonate; pharmacokinetics; salicylic acid

    Introduction

    spirin, also known as acetyl salicylic acid

    is a salicylate drug belonging to non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs

    (NSAIDs). It is used as an analgesic to relieve

    pains and minor aches, as an antipyretic to reduce

    fever, and as antiinflammatory medication (Ranget al., 2007). It also has anti platelet effect and is

    used for longterm, in low doses to prevent heartattacks, strokes and blood clot formation in people

    at high risk for developing blood clots (Lewis et

    al., 1983). Aspirin is also used as a chemo

    preventive agent in cancer because of its anti

    proliferative and apoptosis inducing properties

    (Amin et al., 2003). The major adverse effects of

    aspirin are gastro intestinal tract and renal toxicity

    (Rang et al., 2007).

    Aspirin acts by suppressing the production of

    prostaglandins and thromboxanes by irreversibly

    inactivating the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme.COX enzyme is required for prostaglandin and

    thromboxane synthesis (Tseeng and Arora, 2008).

    Specifically, aspirin acts as an acetylating agent

    where an acetyl group is covalently attached to a

    serine residue in the active site of the COX enzyme

    (Tseeng and Arora, 2008). There are two isoformsof COX: COX 1 and COX 2. Different tissues

    express varying levels of COX 1 and COX 2.

    COX1 is constitutive, present in nearly all cells

    and COX 2 is inducible, undetectable in most

    normal tissues but abundant in other cells at sites of

    inflammation. Aspirin irreversibly inhibits COX

    1 and modifies the activity of COX 2. Theinhibitions of prostaglandins and thromboxane

    synthesis results in the loss of thromboxane A2, a

    potent platelet activator and this drastically reduce

    platelet aggregation (Hankey and Eikelboom,

    2006).Both aspirin and salicylic acid are moderately weak

    acids and very little of it is ionized in the stomach

    on oral administration; absorption from the

    stomach will be greater at low pH because they areabsorbed largely in their non ionized forms, such

    as exists at the low pH in the stomach. Aspirin ispoorly soluble in the acidic conditions of the

    stomach and this can delay absorption of high

    doses.

    About 5080% of salicylate in the blood is bound

    by protein which is concentration dependent and

    the rest remains in active, ionized state. Saturation

    of binding sites leads to more free salicylate and

    increased toxicity. The volume of distribution is 0.1

    0.2 l/kg and acidosis increases the volume of

    distribution because of enhancement of tissue

    penetration of salicylates (Levy and Tsuchiya,1972). About 80% of aspirin is metabolized in the

    liver through conjugation with glucuronic acid and

    glycine and these pathways have only a limited

    capacity (Levy and Tsuchiya, 1972). Salicylates are

    excreted mainly by the kidneys as salicyluric acid,

    free salicylic acid, salicylic phenol and acylglucuronides, and gentisic acid. On ingestion of

    small doses, all pathways proceed by first order

    kinetics with elimination halflife of about 24.5

    hours (Done, 1960). With large salicylates doses

    the half life becomes much longer and kinetics

    switch from first order to zero order because

    metabolic pathways become saturated and renalexcretion becomes increasingly important. Salicylic

    acid is extremely sensitive to changes in urine pH.

    A

    INTERFERENCE OF SODIUM BICARBONATE ON THE

    PHARMACOKINETICS OF AN ORALLY ADMINISTERED DOSE OF ASPIRIN

  • 7/31/2019 HOSEA Et Al 2011 Corrected

    2/5

    Iliya et al 2011/ Journal of Pharmacology and Tropical Therapeutics 1 (2) 17 - 21

    18

    When the urine pH is increased from 5 to 8, there is

    a 10 to 20 fold increase in renal clearance and this

    has been exploited in the use of sodium bicarbonate

    in salicylate poisoning (Dargan et al., 2002).

    In the study, HPLC method was utilized to

    determine the levels of salicylic acid (SA) in

    plasma and in urine of two set of volunteers, eachset initially comprising of three volunteers to study

    the pharmacokinetics of an orally administered

    dose of aspirin with, and without sodium

    bicarbonate. In the course of the study, only two

    volunteers, one volunteer in each set stayed up to

    the end of the study.

    Materials

    In the study, the following were used: aspirin

    tablets, sodium bicarbonate tablets (all from J.T

    Baker Chemical Company, Dagentiam, England),

    High Performance Liquid Chromatography

    (HPLC) system with a Hichrom C 18 reversephase column (250 x 4.6 mm) packed with 5 m

    spherical particles with a solvent system

    comprising acidified aqueous methanol and U.V.

    spectrophotometer for monitoring of the columneffluent. All other solutions/reagents were of

    analytical grade.

    The study was carried out at Institute of Medical

    Sciences, University of Aberdeen. Six adult male

    volunteers were recruited and divided into two sets

    each set comprising of three volunteers. Writtenconsent from the volunteers was obtained after

    explaining study objectives to them but only two

    stayed up to the end of the study. Institutionalethical approval was obtained from the Research

    and Ethical Committee of Institute of Medical

    Sciences, University of Aberdeen.

    MethodsPreparation of platelet poor plasma from blood

    samples of volunteers

    Volunteer 1 ingested 600 mg aspirin plus 10 gsodium bicarbonate while volunteer 2 ingested 600

    mg aspirin. 10 ml whole blood sample was taken

    from each volunteer prior to aspirin and sodium

    bicarbonate ingestion at time zero hour (t = 0 h)

    and subsequently at t = 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 h afteraspirin and sodium bicarbonate ingestion. 9.0 ml of

    whole blood from each volunteer taken at the

    various time intervals was added to 2.0 ml

    anticoagulant (3.8% w/v trisodium citrate) in a

    plastic sterillin tube and gently mixed.

    The two blood samples were first balanced before

    centrifuging at 250 x g (800 rpm) for 10 minutes

    and a plastic transfer pipette used to remove the

    platelet rich plasma. The two samples were

    centrifuged again at 1500 x g (2,500 rpm) for a

    further 10 minutes. The platelet poor plasma was

    removed with a plastic transfer pipette and placed

    in a plastic tube, capped, labeled and stored at -200C.

    HPLC determination of Salicylic Acid in plasma

    HPLC conditions

    Column: 250 x 4.6 mm Hichrom (5) RPB

    Mobile phase: 50% (v/v) 30 mM sodium citrate,

    pH 2.5 with HCl and 50% (v/v) methanol

    Flow rate: 1 ml/min.

    Detector wavelength: 247 nmInjection volume: 20 l

    Preparation of standard curves for Acetylsalicylic

    Acid and Salicylic Acid

    Standard curves were prepared using water, ASA

    stock solution 0.2 mg/ml, and SA stock solution 0.5mg/ml (Table 1).

    Extraction procedure for standard and sample

    The plasma samples obtained from the two

    volunteers at different time intervals were vortex

    mixed and 500 l of each plasma sample was

    pipette into a test tube. To both the standards and

    the samples, 50 l of 0.1 mg/ml phenacetinsolution and 60 l of 1.0 M HCl were added and

    vortex mixed. 5.0 ml of diethyl ether was added,

    capped and mixed for 15 minutes on rotary mixer

    then centrifuged for 5 minutes at 3000 rpm. Theether layer (upper) was transferred to fresh test

    tubes using Pasteur pipette, evaporated using a

    nitrogen vortex evaporator and reconstituted in 150

    l of mobile phase containing 5% 1.0 M HCl.

    Peak areas were used to determine the

    SA/Phenacetin area ratios and a standard curve ofSA concentration versus area ratio plotted. From

    the graph, the concentrations of SA in the plasma at

    various time intervals were calculated.Retention Times

    Acetyl salicylic acid: 5.6 minutes

    Phenacetin: 6.9 minutes

    Salicylic acid: 6.5 minutes

    Determination of salicylate levels in urine samples

    of volunteers

    Urine samples from the two volunteers were also

    obtained at various time intervals (0, 0 1, 12, 2

    4, 46, 67, 724 hours) and vortex mixed. 1

    ml of urine or standard sodium salicylate solution

    (0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/ml)

    was pipette into test tubes and 5 ml ferric nitrate

    solution (40 mg/ml in 0.1 M HCl) was added,capped and vortex mixed. The absorbance at 525

    nm was read.

    A standard curve of sodium salicylate

    concentration against absorbance was plotted and

    the concentration of salicylic acid in each urine

    sample at various time intervals calculated.

    Results

    Calculation

    Area ratio = peak area of SA/peak area of

    phenacetin

    Area ratios for standards at different concentrations

    were calculated and tabulated (Table 2). It can be

  • 7/31/2019 HOSEA Et Al 2011 Corrected

    3/5

  • 7/31/2019 HOSEA Et Al 2011 Corrected

    4/5

    Corresponding author: [email protected]; +2348033119599

    Table 5: Urine data of set 1 volunteer

    Time (Hours) Vol. (ml) Absorbance SA

    concentration

    in urine(mg/ml)

    Amount

    excreted in

    urine (mg)

    Excretion

    rate (mg/h)

    Cumulative

    amount

    excreted(mg)

    0 80 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    0 - 1 580 0.216 0.10 58.00 58.00 58.001 - 2 270 0.266 0.13 35.10 35.10 93.10

    2 - 4 120 0.405 0.21 25.20 12.60 118.30

    4 - 6 170 0.541 0.28 47.60 23.80 165.90

    6 - 7 70 0.575 0.30 21.00 21.00 186.907 - 24 1080 0.332 0.17 183.60 10.80 370.50

    DiscussionThe results obtained showed differences in the

    mean pharmacokinetics data of the two set of

    volunteers, particularly the renal clearance of set 1

    volunteer was greater than that of set 2 volunteersuggesting interference of sodium bicarbonate with

    the pharmacokinetics of an orally administereddose of aspirin. The ingestion of bicarbonate with

    aspirin might have resulted in increase urinary pH

    and this might have affected salicylate renal

    reabsorption. The blood salicylate levels might

    have been reduced by bicarbonate probably owing

    to increased excretion of salicylates in the urine.

    The bicarbonate raises the pH of the urine and this

    increases the renal excretion of free salicylate

    resulting in lowering of plasma salicylate levels(Dargan et al., 2002).

    Table 7: Pharmacokinetics data of the two sets

    of volunteersPharmacokinetic

    parameter

    Volunteer 1 Volunteer 2

    Elimination

    constant plasma

    (Kel)

    0.27 hr-1 0.17 hr-1

    Elimination half

    life (t1/2)

    2.57 hrs 4.08 hrs

    Area under the

    curve (AUC)

    0.41 mg.h/ml 0.66 mg.h/ml

    Renal clearance 15.06 ml/min 2.88 ml/min

    Volume of

    distribution (vd)

    5.40 L 5.40 L

    Bioavailability(F)

    0.9999 0.9999

    Total clearance 24.15 ml/min 15.00 ml/min

    Elimination

    constant renal

    (K)

    0.51 hr-1

    0.65 hr-1

    Absorption rate

    constant (Kabs)

    0.199 hr-1

    0.165 hr-1

    Absorption half

    life

    3.50 hrs 4.2 hrs

    Change in the pH of urine will change the rate of

    urinary excretion. When a drug is in its unionized

    form it will more readily diffuse from the urine to

    the blood. In acidic urine, aspirin being an acidic

    drug will diffuse back into the blood from the

    urine. The control of urinary pH in studies of

    pharmacokinetics is, thus, vital as urinary pH can

    be important in determining drug toxicity more

    directly. Bicarbonate alkalinizes the urine raisingthe urine pH and in alkaline urine, aspirin being an

    acidic drug will be in ionized form and will notdiffuse back into the blood from the urine but will

    be excreted.

    Aspirin also undergoes first pass (pre systemic)

    elimination where it is extracted so efficiently by

    the gut wall and /or liver which lead to reduced

    blood levels of the parent drug or even some of its

    active metabolites when the drug is given orally.

    The amount reaching the systemic circulation is

    considerably less than the amount absorbed andthis reduces bioavailability even when aspirin is

    well absorbed from the gut. The first pass

    elimination of aspirin results in a much larger dose

    of the drug being needed when it is given orallythan when it is given by other routes. Also, marked

    individual variations can occur in the extent of firstpass metabolism of aspirin and this can result in

    unpredictability when aspirin is taken orally

    (Kotani et al., 2010). This might also be another

    reason behind the different pharmacokinetics data

    obtained from the two set of volunteers.

    The occurrence of first pass effect in the

    metabolism and distribution of orally administered

    aspirin in man is also important in respect of the

    dosage form of the drug. Thus, enteric coated

    aspirin is absorbed to an appreciable extent in the

    upper intestinal tract (compared with plain tabletsof the drug which are absorbed largely in the

    stomach). Consequently, aspirin released from

    enteric coated tablets may undergo appreciably

    more hepato- intestinal metabolism to salicylate

    than evident with plain aspirin tablets. This is quite

    important therapeutically, example, in achieving an

    optimal aspirin/salicylate ratio for prophylaxis of

    platelet regulated thrombogenesis (Kotani et al.,

    2010).

    In the study, HPLC was used for the separation of

    salicylic acid because of its simple application in

    the analysis of salicylates and their metabolites

    (Kees etal., 1996). The procedure utilizes a C 18reverse phase column with a solvent system

  • 7/31/2019 HOSEA Et Al 2011 Corrected

    5/5

    Iliya et al 2011/ Journal of Pharmacology and Tropical Therapeutics 1 (2) 17 - 21

    21

    comprising acidified aqueous methanol and U.V.

    spectrophotometer for monitoring of the column

    effluent. Thus, HPLC separation of salicylic acid

    can be applied in human bioavailability studies.

    The study has shown that both aspirin and its active

    metabolite salicylic acid being weak acids are

    extremely sensitive to changes in urine pH, and sowhen the urine pH is increased, renal clearance is

    also increased, thus, it can be concluded that

    sodium bicarbonate interferes with the

    pharmacokinetics of an orally administered dose of

    aspirin and this can be exploited in salicylate

    poisoning. Also, the first pass elimination of aspirin

    can lead to reduced blood levels of aspirin and

    salicylic acid when given orally and this can be

    important in respect of the dosage form of the drug.

    Acknowledgement

    The authors are grateful to Mr. Camaroo of theInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of

    Aberdeen, UK for technical assistance and Dr. N.

    N. Wannang of the Department of Pharmacology,

    University of Jos, Nigeria for critical reading of the

    manuscript.

    Table 6: Urine data of set 2 volunteer

    Time (h) Vol. (ml) Absorbance SA concentration

    in urine (mg/ml)

    Amount excreted

    in urine (mg)

    Excretion

    rate (mg/h)

    Cumulative

    amount

    excreted (mg)

    0 60 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    0 - 1 560 0.165 0.07 39.20 39.20 39.20

    1 - 2 250 0.218 0.10 25.00 25.00 64.202 - 4 100 0.358 0.18 18.00 9.00 73.20

    4 - 6 150 0.480 0.25 37.50 18.80 92.00

    6 - 7 50 0.515 0.27 13.50 13.50 105.50

    7 - 24 1060 0.288 0.14 48.40 8.70 114.20

    ReferencesAmin, R., Kamitani, H., Sultana, H., Taniura, S.,Islam, A., Sho, A., Ishibashi, M., Eling, T. and

    Watanabe, T. (2003). Aspirin and indomethacin

    exhibit antiproliferative effects and induce

    apoptosis in T98G human glioblastoma cells,

    Neurological Research 25(4): 370376.

    Dargan, P.I., Wallace, C.I. and Jones, A.L. (2002).

    An evidence based flowchart to guide the

    management of acute salicylate (aspirin) overdose,

    Emergency Medicine Journal 19(3): 206209.

    Done, A.K. (1960). Salicylate intoxication.

    Significance of measurements of salicylate in blood

    in cases of acute ingestion, Paediatrics 26(1): 800

    807.

    Hankey, G.J. and Eikelboom, J.W. (2006). Aspirin

    resistance,Lancet367(9510): 606617.

    Kees, F., Jehnich, D. and Grobecker, H. (1996).

    Simultaneous determination of acetyl salicylic acid

    and salicylic acid in human plasma by high

    performance liquid chromatography, Journal ofChromatography and Biomedical Applications

    677(1): 172177.

    Kotani, K., Caccavello, R., Hermo, R., Yamada, T.,

    Taniguchi, N. and Gugliucci, A. (2010). Serum

    cholesterol concentration associated with aspirin

    esterase activity in older people: preliminary data,

    International Journal of Medical Sciences7(1): 90

    93.

    Levy, G. and Tsuchiya, T. (1972). Salicylate

    accumulation kinetics in man, The New England

    Journal of Medicine 287(9): 430432.

    Lewis, H.D., Davis, J.W., Archibald, D.G., Steinke,

    W.E., Smitherman, T.C., Doherty, J.E., Schnaper,

    H.W., Lewinter, M.M., Linares, E., Pouget, J.M.,

    Sabharwal, S.C., Chesler, E. and Demots, H.

    (1983). Protective effects of aspirin against acutemyocardial infarction and death in men with

    unstable angina. Results of a veterans

    administration cooperative study, The New

    England Journal of Medicine 309(7): 396403.

    Rang, H.P., Dale, M.M., Ritter, J.M. and Flower,

    R.J. (2007). Anti inflammatory and

    immunosuppressant drugs. In 6th (Ed). Rang andDales Pharmacology. Churchill Livingstone,

    London P. 226247.

    Tseeng, S. and Arora, R. (2008). Aspirin

    resistance: biological and clinical implications,

    Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and

    Therapeutics 13(1): 512.