Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2018
HONEY CATEGORY OVERVIEW
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
2
95.5
101.3
105.9
110.6109.6
Latest 52 Wks4YA
Latest 52 Wks3YA
Latest 52 Wks2YA
Latest 52 WksYA
Latest 52 Wks
509.0
558.4595.0
621.7 630.2
Latest 52 Wks4YA
Latest 52 Wks3YA
Latest 52 Wks2YA
Latest 52 WksYA
Latest 52 Wks
DOLLARS (in Millions)
HONEY IS A $630 MILLION CATEGORY AT RETAILDollar Growth Leveling Off (+1.4%), Unit Growth Declined 0.9%
UNITS (in Millions)
Source: Nielsen Scantrak - Answers on Demand Core, xAOC+Convenience (Week Ending 12/01/2018)
↑ 6.0%
↑4.6%
↑ 4.5% 0.9%↑9.7%
↑6.5%↑4.5% ↑1.4% ↑
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
3
102.5 108.4 110.4 111.7 105.5
12.916.1 21.3 27.9 31.8
Latest 52 Wks 4YA Latest 52 Wks 3YA Latest 52 Wks 2YA Latest 52 Wks YA Latest 52 Wks
HONEY VOLUME FALLS 1.6% IN 2018137.3 Million LB’s (16 Oz) sold at retail in 2018, Declines Fueled by Processed Honey
VOLUME- EQ Units of 16 Oz (in Millions)
Source: Nielsen Scantrak - Answers on Demand Core, xAOC+Convenience Week ending 12/01/2018
-1.6%↑7.9% ↑5.8%
↑6.0%
↑
Raw
Processed
↑5.7%
↑14.1%
↑1.2%↑1.9% -5.5%
↑
↑25% ↑32.3% ↑30.9%
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
4
Pounds of Organic Honey Sold Grew by 2.8% in 2018, Compared to a loss of 2.0% for Non Organic Honey
Source: Nielsen Scantrak - Answers on Demand Core, (Data Through 12/1/2018)
ORGANIC CONTINUES TO DRIVE GROWTHOrganic Growth Flattens, Continues to Gain Share
34% 32%
24%
2.84%6.62%
4.19% 4.59% -2.04%
Latest 52 Wks3YA
Latest 52 Wks2YA
Latest 52 WksYA
Latest 52 Wks
EQ GROWTH (EQ % CHG)
8.90%
91.10%
2014EQ
SHARE
2018EQ
SHARE
Organic Non-Organic
EQ Share of Organic Honey has almost doubled over the last 5 years, as Organic Honey has accounted for 44% of all EQ Growth.
2018 Organic EQ Growth
+ 336,550 LBS2018 Non-Organic EQ Growth
-2,606,640 LBS
4.70%
95.30%
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
5
FLAVORED HONEY $ GROWS 29.3% IN 2018Acacia, Blueberry Flavors Outperforming
Nielsen xAOC +Conv Latest 52 Weeks W/E 12/01/2018
2,927,938
3,526,333
4,470,189
4,458,733
5,764,075
Latest 52Wks 4YA
Latest 52Wks 3YA
Latest 52Wks 2YA
Latest 52Wks YA
Latest 52Wks
↑29.3%
↑26.8%
↑20.4%
-0.3%
↑
Description
Latest 52 Wks - W/E 12/01/18
$ $ Vol % Chg
HONEY 630,223,890 1.4
UNFLAVORED 624,459,815 1.2
FLAVORED 5,764,075 29.3
ACACIA 904,033 14.8
BLUEBERRY 700,589 294.8
CINNAMON 473,910 27.0
SWEET 438,084 171.3
ORANGE 406,993 -7.3
VANILLA BEAN 237,756 119.5
HUAJILLO 225,971 -15.0
PACIFIC NORTHWEST BLACKBERRY 222,949 -17.0
BLACKBERRY 211,079 40.9
LEMON 154,906 216.7
BERRY 129,999 396.0
VANILLA AND NUTMEG 120,121 -29.1
MESQUITE 119,527 -6.1
TRUFFLE 107,824 66.2
GALLBERRY 99,265 -1.6
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
6
CONSUMER PURCHASING BEHAVIOR
PENETRATION
30.8% [ -1.5% ]
38,260 HHs* [ -1,678 HHs ]
BUYING RATE
$13.94 [ +$0.26]
40.4% 2+ Repeat Buyers [+0.0%)
PURCHASE FREQUENCY
2.0 TRIPS [ 0.0 TRIPS ]
3.6 TRIPS Amongst 2+ Buyers
[+.1 TRIPS ]
PURCHASE SIZE
$6.92 [ +$0.11 ]
1.1UNITS [ 0.0 UNITS ]
1.68 MM FEWER HOUSEHOLDS BUY HONEY
*Note: Households expressed in (000)
Source: Nielsen Homescan- 52 Weeks ending 12/01/2017
Households Spending More Per Trip
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
7
PENETRATION DROPS, SPEND INCREASESTrips and % of 2+ Households Remains Flat
13.1513.68 13.94
2016 2017 2018
$ Per HH PRCH
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
8
723 1,066 1,097 1,542 2,102 2,276 3,054 4,420 4,463 5,535 7,919 11,938 14,18324,314
42,239
99,755 102,689
202,048
CONVENTIONAL GROCERY AND CLUB LOSING SHARE OF HONEY $ IN 2018Value Grocery and Mass (excl Supers) Gaining Share
Source: Nielsen Homescan Latest 52 Weeks Ending 12/01/2018
↑4.4%
↑10%
↑78%
↑14 %
-9.8%
↑52%
↑16%
-1.3%
↑2%
↑23% ↑30%
-28%
-23%
-3.2%
-0.4%
Warehouse/Club
Conventional Grocery.4%
+1.1%
2%Value Grocery
4.4%
Mass Excl Super14%
10% 23% Drug Stores
Military
($ 000)
↑228%↑9%
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
9
NIELSEN MARKETS
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
10
$12,988
$9,400
$14,508
$6,691
$27,174
San Francisco xAOC
Salt Lake City Boise xAOC
Houston xAOC
Sacramento xAOC
Los Angeles xAOC
$15,145
$16,270
$5,653
$6,553
$17,546
Denver xAOC
Chicago xAOC
Birmingham xAOC
Cincinnati xAOC
Atlanta xAOC
$15,145
$16,270
$16,323
$17,546
$17,875
$18,289
$19,227
$19,294
$27,174
$41,110
Denver xAOC
Chicago xAOC
Washington DC xAOC
Atlanta xAOC
Boston xAOC
Dallas/Ft. Worth xAOC
Miami xAOC
Philadelphia xAOC
Los Angeles xAOC
New York xAOC
LOS ANGELES HONEY DECLINES BY 8%Atlanta Leads % $ Growth. Cincinnati, Birmingham, Chicago fuel Honey Gains
xAOC SMM- Latest 52 Weeks Ending 12/01/2018
Largest Honey $ Markets (000) Fastest $ Growth Markets (000)
↑7.0%
↑6.9%
↑6.4%
↑6.2%
↑5.1%
-0.8%
-8.0%
↑2.2%
↑3.0%
-0.5%
↑2.6%
↑7.0%
↑3.5%
↑6.2%
↑5.1%
Slowest $ Growth Markets (000)
-8.0%
-2.5%
-4.1%
-2.4%
-1.6%
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
11
$136,544,636 -1.3%
$119,935,563 +4.4%
$258,924,079 +2.8%
$112,387,681 +0.7%
$143,437,271 +3.8%
$80,915,699 -3.4%
$82,762,032 +1.0%
$79,940,383 +0.2%
$77,674,792 +2.6%
$55,628,937 +3.6%
$42,260,772 +1.0%
$32,724,776 +3.4%
$32,447,298 +2.1%
South Atlantic
Pacific
W S Central
Mid Atlantic
E N Central
Mountain
W N Central
E S Central
New England
South
North Central
West
North East
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
12
AVG PRICE GROWTH INCREASES 2.3% IN 2018
3.92
4.71
4.46
5.10
Grocery
Drug
Convenience
4.76
4.68
6.06
7.51
AVG EQ PRICE 2018
Average Unit PricexAOC + Conv
11.59
5.15
6.06
6.12
6.56
6.44
18.85
11.77
Processed Raw
Latest 52 W/E 12/01/2018
4.80
5.00
5.20
5.40
5.60
5.80
Latest 52 Wks4YA
Latest 52 Wks3YA
Latest 52 Wks2YA
Latest 52 Wks YA Latest 52 Wks
Avg Unit Price Any Promo Price No Promo Price
-6.4%
-6.6%
-7.8%
-9.2%
-7.1%
Avg Promotional Discount dropping
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
13
PROMOTION FLAT, INCREASES IN FEAT AD
Source: Nielsen AOD- Total U.S. xAOC+Conv- Latest 52 Weeks ending 12.1.2018
23.5% [+0%] of All $ on Promo
(25.1% of all Units [+0.0%])
7.5% [-0.1%] of All $ from Any
Display (7.6% of all Units[+0.0%])
15.4% [-0.9%] of all $ Sold on
TPR (17.7% of all Units[-0.9%]) 5.7% [+1.7%] of all
$ Sold on Feature Ad (5.4% of All Units [+1.2%])
Promotional activity
increased by $2.1MM over the past year
Consumer Perception of receiving
a deal Decreased
by .5% over the past
year
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
14
HONEY PROMO PROVIDED LIFT
Source: Nielsen AOD Base and Incremental Facts- Total U.S. xAOC+ Conv, Latest 52 Weeks ending 12.01.2018
Any Promo
Feat w/o Display
Display w/o Feat
Feature & Display
Temporary Price Reduction
% of $% of Units
INCR.% $ Lift
23.5%
11.8%
1.5%
4.2%
6.1%
25.1%
13.2%
1.0%
4.4%
6.5%
$26.5MM
$15.4MM
$2.7MM
$5.9MM
$2.5MM
21.8%
26.2%
41.6%
28.6%
7.0%
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
15
PLASTIC, BOTTLES/JUGS OUTPERFORM
12 oz Most Popular Size Bottles, Bear, Jug Drive Growth while Jars Underperform
$ Share Unit Share
DESCRIPTION Units Sold$ % Chg
YAUnits % Chg YA
HONEY 109,560,939 1.4 (0.9)
12 Oz - 12.99 Oz 43,610,574 2.75 2.39
16 Oz - 16.99 Oz 23,279,718 1.73 (0.56)
24 Oz- 24.99 Oz 13,881,860 (1.23) (3.11)
32 Oz- 32.99 Oz 7,986,905 5.48 2.63
40 Oz - 40.99 Oz 5,343,293 (21.47) (23.46)
44 Oz- 44.99 Oz 1,962,039 500.80 521.04
48 Oz - 48.99 Oz 2,308,967 7.86 3.81
80 Oz - 80.99 Oz 1,326,645 (0.91) 2.97
8 Oz - 8.99 Oz 6,100,119 (0.76) (9.57)
22 Oz- 22.99 Oz 714,774 (18.85) (19.49)
Description
Latest 52 Wks - W/E 12/01/18
$$ % Chg
YAUnits
Units % ChgYA
Avg Unit Price
HONEY 630,223,890 1.4 109,560,939 -0.9 5.75
BOTTLE 350,342,522 3.0 59,939,458 -0.5 5.85
JAR 138,460,336 -3.0 19,287,927 -4.3 7.18
BEAR 112,388,045 1.9 27,252,740 0.6 4.12
JUG 17,003,420 3.7 1,301,331 5.5 13.07
TUB 3,810,726 -7.5 687,245 -8.1 5.55
BAG 2,073,612 -15.7 325,773 -15.4 6.37
CAN 1,415,422 -11.4 84,080 -19.9 16.83
ENVELOPE 910,734 143.1 93,910 151.0 9.70
BOX 751,368 7.5 105,941 12.5 7.09
BEEHIVE 633,670 -6.6 131,146 -4.5 4.83
25.67%
20.77%
17.74%
14.64%
11.21%
9.96%
12 Oz - 12.99 Oz
16 Oz - 16.99 Oz
Other
24 Oz- 24.99 Oz
32 Oz- 32.99 Oz
40 Oz - 40.99 Oz
25.7%
21.2%14.1%
12.7%
7.3%4.9%
12 Oz - 12.99 Oz
16 Oz - 16.99 Oz
Other
24 Oz- 24.99 Oz
32 Oz- 32.99 Oz
40 Oz - 40.99 Oz
Description
Latest 52 Wks - W/E 12/01/18
$$ % Chg
YAUnits
Units % Chg YA
Avg Unit Price
HONEY 630,223,890 1.4 109,560,939 -0.9 5.75
PLASTIC 500,497,195 2.8 91,648,992 -0.1 5.46
GLASS 126,101,117 -3.8 17,517,001 -4.9 7.20
METAL 1,507,518 -12.0 91,826 -20.1 16.42
CARDBOARD 490,379 -9.0 112,757 -9.3 4.35
COATED PAPER 262,753 89.4 39,365 50.7 6.68
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
16
-1.7 -4.31.9 1.4
51.9
-19.22.4
HONEY GAINS SHARE OF SWEETENERS ($)Sweetener’s $ Vol Fell 1.7% in 2018
Nielsen Total U.S. xAOC+Conv, W/E 12/01/18
$ % Chg Vs Yago
56%
22%
22%
0% 0%0%
SUGAR
SUGAR SUBSTITUTES
HONEY
SUGAR & SUGAR SUBSTITUTEBLENDS
SUGAR SUBSTITUTE BLENDS
SUGAR AND SWEETENERSCOMBINATION PACKS
Sweeteners Total
SugarSugar Subst
HoneySugar & Subst. Blend
Subst. Blend
Sugar& Sweetener
$ Share
$ $ % Chg YA Units Units % Chg YA
SUGAR AND SWEETENERS 2,872,410,394 -1.7 924,994,739 -1.9
SUGAR 1,597,329,561 -4.3 674,873,300 -2.6
SUGAR SUBSTITUTES 638,428,490 1.9 139,313,165 0.7
HONEY 630,223,890 1.4 109,560,939 -0.9
SUGAR & SUGAR SUBSTITUTE BLENDS 3,748,616 51.9 647,717 36.6
SUGAR SUBSTITUTE BLENDS 2,406,667 -19.2 569,355 -12.5
SUGAR AND SWEETENERS COMBINATION PACKS 273,170 2.4 30,264 -1.1
DescriptionLatest 52 Wks - W/E 12/01/18
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
17
HONEY DEMOGRAPHICSGrowth in Lower income levels. 45.9% of All Honey $ from Households making $70k +
Consumer Facts- Syndicated Demographics- 52 Weeks Ending 12/01/2018
Honey Makes Gains with Lower Income Families making between $30,000-$40,000 Annually, and those making $70,000-$100,000 Annually. Middle Class declining.
Honey consumption increased in single member households,
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Under $20,000 12.5 13.5 92 -3.7
[02] - $20,000 - $29,999 10.2 11.3 90 0.9
[03] - $30,000 - $39,999 10.2 9.2 111 15.3
[04] - $40,000 - $49,999 7.6 8.5 89 -8.5
[05] - $50,000 - $69,999 13.6 13.9 98 -2.4
[06] - $70,000 - $99,999 15.9 15.5 102 3.3
[07] - $100,000+ 30.0 28.1 107 -3.0
Household Incomoe
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Single Member 19.6 27.3 72 1.1
[02] - Two Members 34.2 32.4 106 -1.3
[03] - 3-4 Members 32.7 29.3 112 1.2
[04] - 5 or more Members 13.4 11.1 121 -2.2
Household Size
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
18
HONEY DEMOGRAPHICS65.8% of Honey $’s come from Households with no Children
Consumer Facts- Syndicated Demographics- 52 Weeks Ending 12/01/2018
Growth in Honey Consumption in Households with Children Under the age of 6
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Under 6 Only 6.5 5.5 118 9.6
[02] - 6-12 Only 7.3 7.6 95 -6.9
[03] - 13-17 Only 8.3 7.6 109 5.5
[04] - Under 6 & 6-12 5.5 4.4 125 -0.1
[05] - Under 6 & 13-17 0.5 0.6 89 -36.4
[06] - 6-12 & 13-17 5.0 4.5 111 -20.4
[07] - Under 6, 6-12 & 13-17 1.1 1.1 107 9.0
[08] - No Children 65.8 68.7 96 0.9
Age & Presence of Children
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
19
HONEY DEMOGRAPHICSYoung Gen-X Women consume Less Honey. Significant increases in Millennial Men
Consumer Facts- Syndicated Demographics- 52 Weeks Ending 12/01/2018
31.6% of all Honey Dollars come from women above 55, Growth with older Gen X Women (50-54). Women under 25 purchase the least amount of honey.
Men Under 30 see significant growth, while middle aged Men (40-44) are 20% more likely than the average consumer to purchase honey
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Under 25 0.5 0.7 76 -2.8
[02] - 25-29 4.0 4.0 100 0.7
[03] - 30-34 10.7 10.4 103 3.5
[04] - 35-39 7.8 7.4 106 -3.1
[05] - 40-44 7.0 7.3 97 -14.2
[06] - 45-49 8.8 8.0 109 -0.1
[07] - 50-54 9.8 9.0 109 12.5
[08] - 55-64 15.4 16.7 92 -7.1
[09] - 65+ 16.2 15.8 103 0.2
AGE OF FEMALE HH
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Under 25 0.4 0.4 99 11.5
[02] - 25-29 2.8 2.7 104 8.0
[03] - 30-34 8.0 7.4 108 -1.4
[04] - 35-39 7.7 6.8 113 -2.4
[05] - 40-44 7.5 6.2 120 8.7
[06] - 45-49 7.0 7.1 99 -0.2
[07] - 50-54 9.4 8.5 111 11.0
[08] - 55-64 14.9 15.0 99 0.0
[09] - 65+ 17.0 15.0 114 0.9
AGE OF MALE HH
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
20
HONEY DEMOGRAPHICSStart Up Families, Young Bustling Families, and Senior Singles remain Strong
Consumer Facts- Syndicated Demographics- 52 Weeks Ending 12/01/2018
Affluent Suburban Spreads remain strong, while families in Plain-Rural living Lifestyles are the weakest segment.
Older Bustling Families and Empty Nest Couples experience declines in honey consumption
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Start-up Families 6.5 5.5 118 9.6
[02] - Small Scale Families 6.8 7.8 87 -15.7
[03] - Younger Bustling Families 10.4 8.4 124 11.8
[04] - Older Bustling Families 10.5 9.6 109 -10.0
[05] - Young Transitionals 6.2 7.7 81 -0.4
[06] - Independent Singles 9.2 14.0 66 -1.6
[07] - Senior Singles 8.3 10.2 81 4.9
[08] - Established Couples 14.6 13.6 108 6.9
[09] - Empty Nest Couples 13.4 12.7 105 -7.0
[10] - Senior Couples 14.1 10.5 135 2.6
BehaviorStage
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Struggling Urban Cores 11.6 11.0 105 -0.1
[02] - Cosmopolitan Centers 14.6 13.8 106 3.4
[03] - Affluent Suburban Spreads 19.5 17.7 110 -3.2
[04] - Plain Rural Living 16.8 19.4 87 0.8
[05] - Modest Working Towns 19.3 19.8 98 -1.2
[06] - Comfortable Country 16.9 16.9 100 0.8
LifeStyle
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
21
HONEY DEMOGRAPHICSRetired and Unemployed women are strongest honey consumers
Consumer Facts- Syndicated Demographics- 52 Weeks Ending 12/01/2018
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Professional 17.2 16.9 102 3.6
[02] - Prop, Managers, Officials 10.3 9.7 107 1.2
[03] - Clerical 4.8 6.2 78 -9.9
[04] - Sales 4.0 4.6 88 -12.4
[05] - Craftsman / Foreman (Skilled) 1.0 1.2 83 -13.8
[06] - Operative (Semi-Skilled) 1.3 1.4 90 7.7
[07] - Service Workers & Private HH Workers 5.7 5.9 97 -3.3
[08] - Farm Owners, Managers, Foremen & Laborers 0.1 0.2 57 -17.1
[09] - Laborers 0.1 0.2 49 -14.6
[10] - Military 0.1 0.1 89 -16.9
[11] - Students Employed < 30 Hours 0.6 0.6 95 10.7
[12] - Retired & Unemployed 35.1 32.3 108 -0.1
Female Occupation
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Employed - Part Time 14.0 13.9 101 -8.3
[02] - Employed - Full Time 30.6 32.5 94 1.4
[03] - Not Employed 35.6 32.9 108 0.0
[04] - No Female Head 19.8 20.7 95 3.5
Female Employment
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
22
HONEY DEMOGRAPHICSMale Head of Households in the Military are strongest Male Honey Consumers
Consumer Facts- Syndicated Demographics- 52 Weeks Ending 12/01/2018
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Professional 20.2 19.3 105 4.3
[02] - Prop, Managers, Officials 12.9 12.6 102 -4.3
[03] - Clerical 3.2 4.4 74 -7.4
[04] - Sales 5.6 6.4 89 -6.4
[05] - Craftsman / Foreman (Skilled) 10.2 9.3 110 9.3
[06] - Operative (Semi-Skilled) 6.0 6.0 99 2.5
[07] - Service Workers & Private HH Workers 5.6 6.0 93 -5.4
[08] - Farm Owners, Managers, Foremen & Laborers 0.3 0.5 58 -72.3
[09] - Laborers 0.9 1.2 78 -25.3
[10] - Military 1.3 1.1 120 -1.6
[11] - Students Employed < 30 Hours 0.4 0.5 81 -11.9
[12] - Retired & Unemployed 33.4 32.8 102 1.5
Male Occupation
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
23
HONEY DEMOGRAPHICSThe Least Educated households consume the least amount of honey
Consumer Facts- Syndicated Demographics- 52 Weeks Ending 12/01/2018
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Grade School 0.3 0.4 62 0.8
[02] - Some High School 2.1 1.9 110 -15.3
[03] - Graduated High School 24.9 26.3 95 -1.5
[04] - Some College 25.6 24.7 104 0.5
[05] - Graduated College 17.8 17.1 104 0.1
[06] - Post College Grad 9.6 8.9 108 -2.5
[07] - No Female Head of Household 19.8 20.7 95 3.5
Female Education
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Grade School 0.5 0.6 91 6.8
[02] - Some High School 3.0 3.0 100 -5.1
[03] - Graduated High School 22.1 22.0 100 2.6
[04] - Some College 23.3 19.9 117 1.1
[05] - Graduated College 17.2 15.8 109 2.6
[06] - Post College Grad 8.5 7.8 109 7.0
[07] - No Male Head of Household 25.4 31.0 82 -4.8
Male Education
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
2012
Th
e N
iels
en C
om
pan
y. C
on
fid
enti
al a
nd
pro
pri
etar
y.
24
HONEY DEMOGRAPHICSAsian Consumption Declines, Caucasian/African American flat
Consumer Facts- Syndicated Demographics- 52 Weeks Ending 12/01/2018
Caucasian Americans are the lowest indexing ethnic group, while African American’s and Asians consume more honey than the average household.
Hispanic Consumption remains Flat.
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Caucasian 68.7 74.8 92 0.3
[02] - African American 16.4 12.5 131 -2.8
[03] - Asian 5.0 4.4 114 -12.0
[04] - Other 9.9 8.2 120 6.9
Ethnicity
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18
% $ in
Demographic
% HH in
Demographic$ / HH Index Change
[01] - Yes 14.5 13.2 110 -1.7
[02] - No 85.5 86.8 98 0.2
Hispanic
Latest 52 - W/E 12/01/18