4
www.ias2011.org Home Based HIV Testing and Counseling in Suba District, Kenya Ulo Benson Suba District (2007) Hard to reach resource poor setting Population – 200,000 (33,000 households) Mainly fishing community Generalized epidemic; HIV prevalence – 30% (National 7.4%) HBCT done 2007 - 2009 MOPDD0203

Home Based HIV Testing and Counseling in Suba District, Kenya Ulo Benson

  • Upload
    carver

  • View
    85

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

MOPDD0203. Home Based HIV Testing and Counseling in Suba District, Kenya Ulo Benson. Suba District (2007) Hard to reach resource poor setting Population – 200,000 (33,000 households) Mainly fishing community Generalized epidemic; HIV prevalence – 30% (National 7.4%) HBCT done 2007 - 2009. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Home Based HIV Testing and Counseling in  Suba  District, Kenya Ulo Benson

www.ias2011.org

Home Based HIV Testing and Counseling in Suba District, Kenya

Ulo BensonSuba District (2007)•Hard to reach resource poor setting•Population – 200,000 (33,000 households)•Mainly fishing community•Generalized epidemic; HIV prevalence – 30% (National 7.4%)•HBCT done 2007 - 2009

MOPDD0203

Page 2: Home Based HIV Testing and Counseling in  Suba  District, Kenya Ulo Benson

www.ias2011.org

Household Education

DeclineTesting

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

NegativeClients

PositiveClients

Individual session

Accept Testing

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Follow upReferral Referral

Referra

Household Education

Household Education

Individual session

Household Education

Individual session

Household Education

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

Follow up

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

Follow up

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

Follow up

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

PositiveClients

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

PositiveClients

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Household Education

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

PositiveClients

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

PositiveClients

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Referral

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

PositiveClients

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

NegativeClients

Referral

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

PositiveClients

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

DeclineTesting

Accept Testing

Individual session

Individual session

Individual session

Accept Testing

Individual session

Accept Testing

Individual session

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

Follow up

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

Follow up

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

Follow up

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

PositiveClients

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

PositiveClients

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

PositiveClients

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

PositiveClients

ReferralFollow up

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

Referral

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

PositiveClients

Referral

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

DeclineTesting

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

PositiveClients

Referral

Risk reductionSupport groups

VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Individual session

DeclineTesting

Risk reductionVCT

VMMCPMTCT

PositiveClientsReferral

CCC/PMTCTSupport group

Risk reductionSupport groups

VCT/VMMCPMTCT

Referral

NegativeClients

Accept Testing

Counseling session

Household

Education

Community Mobilization

METHODS - HBHCT Model

Volunteers

Page 3: Home Based HIV Testing and Counseling in  Suba  District, Kenya Ulo Benson

www.ias2011.org

Results and Conclusion

Results•84% of targeted households accepted HBTC•68,315 (10,790 couples), (57% F; 43% M) males tested•60.3% – first time testers. •HIV prevalence was 10.5% (F - 12.3% ; M - 8.2%).•9% of the 10,790 couples were discordant.

Conclusion•Rapid HTC scale up for all age groups•Identification of discordant couples •Potential to increase enrollment into care early

Page 4: Home Based HIV Testing and Counseling in  Suba  District, Kenya Ulo Benson

www.ias2011.org

Thank youSuba district – Vision 2030Typical Island in Suba district (2011)