Upload
parson
View
42
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Lecture I: Holographic description of Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP in equilibrium ). Holographic description of heavy-ions collisions. Lecture II: Holographic Description of Formation of Quark Gluon Plasma . Multiplicity. Irina Aref’eva Steklov Mathematic al Institute , Moscow. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Holographic description of heavy-ions collisions
Irina Aref’eva
Steklov Mathematical Institute, Moscow
7th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING:Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics 9 - 19 September 2012, Belgrade, Serbia
Lecture II: Holographic Description of Formation of Quark Gluon Plasma. Multiplicity
Lecture I: Holographic description of Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP in equilibrium)
Holography for thermal states
TQFT in MD-space-time Black holein AdSD+1-space-time =
Lecture I. : Hologhraphic description of Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP in equilibruum)
TQFT = QFT with temperature
AdS/CFT correspondence in Euclidean space. T=0
denotes Euclidean time ordering
Hzz 0
+ requirement of regularity at horizon
0M
ET e
O
0[ ( )]cSe
g:
( , , ), [ ], [ ] 0g g cx z S S
Ex
FROM Lecture 1
AdS/CFT correspondence. Minkowski. T=0
QFT at finite temperature (D=4) Classical gravity with black hole (D=5)
QFT with T
4
/
( ) ( ) [ ( ), (0)
/
R ikx
H T
G k i d ke t x
e Z
O O
O Otr
Bogoliubov-Tyablikov Green function
-- retarded temperature Green function in 4-dim MinkowskiRG
F -- kernel of the action for the (scalar) field in AdS5 with BLACK HOLE
Son, Starinets, 2002
LHS
FROM Lecture 1
Hologhraphic thermalizationThermalization of QFT in Minkowski D-dim space-time
Black Hole formation in Anti de Sitter (D+1)-dim space-time
Lecture II.: Hologhraphic Description of Formation of Quark Gluon Plasma
Studies of BH formation in AdSD+1Time of thermalization in HIC
Multiplicity in HIC
HIC = heavy ions collisions
Formation of BH in AdS. Deformations of AdS metric leading to BH formation
• colliding gravitational shock waves
• drop of a shell of matter with vanishing rest mass
("null dust"), infalling shell geometry = Vaidya metric
• sudden perturbations of the metric near the boundary that propagate into the bulk
Gubser, Pufu, Yarom, Phys.Rev. , 2008 Alvarez-Gaume, C. Gomez, Vera, Tavanfar, Vazquez-Mozo, PRL, 2009IA, Bagrov, Guseva, Joukowskaya, 2009 JHEPKiritsis, Taliotis, 2011
Chesler, Yaffe, 2009
Danielsson, Keski-Vakkuri and Kruczenski…….
Deformations of MD metric by infalling shell
4-dimensional infalling shell geometry (Vaidya metric) Vaidya 1951
flat
Deformations of MD metric by infalling shell
4-dimensional Minkowski. Penrose diagram
Deformations of MD metric by infalling shell . Vaidya metric
=
Deformations of AdS metric by infalling shell
d+1-dimensional infalling shell geometry is described in Poincar'e coordinates by the Vaidya metric Danielsson, Keski-Vakkuri and Kruczenski
1)
Danielsson, Keski-Vakkuri and Kruczenski
Deformations of AdS metric infalling shell (Vaidya metric) )
Estimations of thermalization times )/(1~ cmTtherm
cfmtherm /3.0~
Hawking temperature (in 5) = temperature of GQP (in 4)
Balasubramanian at all 1103.26833 measures of thermalization:
two-point functions, Wilson loop v.e.v., entanglement entropy.
Geodesics and correlators
1 1
2 2
( , )
( , )
x M
x M
1 1 2 2( , ) ( , )x x O O
Geodesics and correlators
Dual description of ultrarelativistic nucleus by shock waves
An ultrarelativistic nucleus is a shock wave in 4d with the energy-momentum tensor
The metric of a shock wave in AdS corresponding to the ultrarelativistic nucleus in 4d is
22242
2
2
22 )(22 dzdxdxzxT
Ndxdx
zLds
C
Janik, Peschanksi ‘05
x
x
2 2 3
1~ ( )( )
T xL x
Woods-Saxon profile
Dual description of collision of 2 ultrarelativistic nucleus
)(~ xT
Two ultrarelativistic nucleus in D=4 correspond to the metric of two shock waves in AdS
2 2 22 4 2 4 2 2 2
2 2 2
2 22 ( ) ( )C C
Lds dx dx T x z dx T x z dx dx dzz N N
x
x
~ ( )T x
Question:
what happens in AdS after collision of two shock waves?
Dual description of collision of 2 ultrarelativistic nucleus
• 't Hooft and Amati, Ciafaloni and Veneziano 1987 Aichelburg-Sexl shock waves to describe particles, Shock Waves ------ > BH
• Colliding plane gravitation waves to describe particles Plane Gravitational Waves ----- > BH I.A., Viswanathan, I.Volovich, Nucl.Phys., 1995
• Boson stars (solitons) to describe particles M.Choptuik and F.Pretorius, PRL, 2010
4-dim 19PlM 10 GeV
BLACK HOLE FORMATION = Trapped Surface(TS)
• Theorem (Penrose): BH Formation = TS
Different profiles An arbitrary gravitational shock wave in AdS5
The chordal coordinate
• Point sourced shock waves
p
LzLzxq
4)( 22
)(q
X-X+
X
TS comprises two halves,which are matched along a “curve”
Trapped Surface for two shock waves in AdS
3 1,23( ) ( ) 0H L
AdS3
Trapped Surface (TS) for two shock waves in AdS
1,2 1,2
2 ( 2)1,2 (1,2)
1 2
0, , 0,
( ), ,
4,
D
the outer null normals have zeroconvergenc
X D X D
X X
e
no function in convergence
X D
X D
Eardley, Giddings; Kang, Nastase,….
• Theorem. TS for two shock waves = . solution to the following Dirichlet problem
D
D
Conjecture
Multiplicity in HIC in D=4 can be estimated by the area of TS in AdS5 formed in collisionof shock waves
Gubser, Pufu, Yarom
D=4 Multiplicity = Area of trapped surface in D=5
Lattice calculations
3 4
35
163
L E TG
4 11E T Hawking-Page relation
From a Woods-Saxon profile for the nuclear density
1: 4.3 4.3 5 ; : 4.4Au L fm Pb L fmGeV
Gubser, Pufu, Yarom, 0805.1551, Alvarez-Gaume, C. Gomez, Vera, Tavanfar, Vazquez-Mozo, 0811.3969IA, Bagrov, Guseva, 0905.1087
Multiplicity: Experimental data, Landau, AdS-estimation
1/4Landau NNS s
Phenomenological estimation: total multiplicity and the number of charged particle
chS NN
1/3trapped NNS s
0.14trapped NNS smodified
0.15data NNS s
0.14~ NNsMModified Hologhrapic Model
Multiplicity: Landau’s/Hologhrapic formula vs experimental data
1/4~ NNsMLandau’s formula
ATLAS Collaboration 1108.6027
Plots from: Alice Collaboration PRL, 2010
Different profiles different multiplicities
Cai, Ji, Soh, gr-qc/9801097IA, 0912.5481
Kiritsis, Taliotis, 1111.1931
• Dilaton shock waves
Multiplicity very closed to LHC data
Goal: try to find a profile to fit experimental data
2 2 2 2 2( )( ( , ) ( ) )ds b r dudv r x u du dr dx
0( )( )a
a
r rb rL
3( 1)
2(3 2)1/3
3 16
1
~
~
aa
a
aa
a
S s
S s
0.142 ~a S s
11 3
1/3
13( 1)
1
~
~
aa
aa
S s
S s
Cut-off
Gubser, Pufu, Yarom,II
• Plane shock waves
Wall-on-wall dual modelof heavy-ion collisions
• Simplify calculation• But strictly speaking not correct• One needs a regularization
I.A., A.Bagrov, E.Pozdeeva, JHEP, 2012
The Einstein equation Lin, Shuryak, 09Wu, Romatschke, Chesler, Yaffe, Kovchegov,….
Phase diagram from dual approach
Formation of trapped surfaces is only possible when Q<Qcr
Red for smeared matterBlue for point-like
I.A., A.Bagrov, Joukovskaya, 0909.1294I.A., A.Bagrov, E.Pozdeeva, 1201.6542
Conclusion
Black Hole formation in AdS5 formation of QGP of 4-dim QCD
Black Hole in AdS5 QGP in 4-dim 2001-2011
• Formula for multiplicity
2008-2012
Future directions: • multiplicity and quark potential for the same dual gravity model • New phase transitions related with parameters of gravity models