Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph
Geomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304
Holocene-emerged notches and tectonic uplift along the Jalisco
coast, Southwest Mexico
M. Teresa Ramırez-Herreraa,*, Vladimir Kostoglodovb, Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchib
aDepartment of Geological Sciences, California State University Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840, USAb Instituto de Geofısica, UNAM, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 04510, D.F., Mexico
Received 24 July 2002; received in revised form 14 July 2003; accepted 16 July 2003
Abstract
This paper presents the preliminary results from a study of Holocene-emerged shorelines, marine notches, and their tectonic
implications along the Jalisco coast. The Pacific coast of Jalisco, SW Mexico, is an active tectonic margin. This coast has been
the site of two of the largest earthquakes to occur in Mexico this century: the 1932 (Mw 8.2) Jalisco earthquake and the 1995
(Mw 8.0) Colima earthquake. Measurement and preliminary radiocarbon dating of emergent paleoshorelines along the Jalisco
coast provide the first constraints upon the timing for tectonic uplift. Along this coastline, uplifted Holocene marine notches and
wave-cut platforms occur at elevations ranging from ca. 1 to 4.5 m amsl. In situ intertidal organisms dated with radiocarbon, the
first ever reported for the Jalisco area, provide preliminary results that record tectonic uplift during at least the past 1300 years
BP at an average rate of about 3 mm/year. We propose a model in which coseismic subsidence produced by offshore
earthquakes is rapidly recovered during the postseismic and interseismic periods. The long-term period is characterized by slow
tectonic uplift of the Jalisco coast. We found no evidence of coastal interseismic and long-term subsidence along the Jalisco
coast.
D 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Holocene; Tectonic uplift; Marine notches; Coastal tectonics; Earthquakes
1. Introduction crustal faulting within the Jalisco Block (Ramırez-
The Jalisco coast, SW Mexico, has been the site of
three of the largest earthquakes to occur in Mexico
this century: the 1932 (Ms 8.1 and Ms 7.8) Jalisco
earthquakes and the 9 October 1995 (Mw 8.0) Colima
earthquake. The structure and the morphology of this
coast have been influenced by the subduction of the
Rivera Plate beneath the North America Plate and by
0169-555X/$ - see front matter D 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2003.07.004
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-562-985-8579; fax: +1-562-
985-8638.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M.T. Ramırez-Herrera).
Herrera and Urrutia-Fucugauchi, 1999; Ramırez-Her-
rera et al., 1999). Although there have been local
studies of the tectonic deformation accompanying
large earthquakes along this active plate margin
(Cumming, 1933; Bodin and Klinger, 1986; Corona-
Esquivel et al., 1988; Hutton et al., 1997, 1998), an
integrated approach to the study of emerged coastal
features (ages and elevations) of this active margin has
yet to be applied.
We identified in situ fossils of intertidal organisms
and morphological indicators of relative sea-level
changes along the Jalisco coast. Intertidal organisms
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / Geomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304292
found in their growth position can be useful indica-
tors of a rapid sea-level change. In situ fragile
intertidal organisms, preserved above the supralittoral
zone and above mean sea level, are possible only
after a very rapid relative sea-level change (Pirazzoli,
Fig. 1. Tectonic setting of the Jalisco coast. Boundaries of the Rivera Plate
Fracture Zone, and the Middle America Trench (MAT). Rivera–Cocos
Unfilled arrows show direction of plate motion, and numbers indicate con
site locations.
1996). Because the distribution of many marine
organisms is directly related to tide levels (or wave
exposure), they are common sea-level indicators and,
when preserved, may be used to identify former sea
levels. Fossil intertidal organisms are very useful
: Rivera fracture zone (Fz), the East Pacific Rise (EPR), the Tamayo
Plate boundary: El Gordo graben (EGG) (Bandy, 1992). Symbols:
vergence rate in centimeters per year. Insert shows area of study and
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / Geomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304 293
indications of former sea-level positions on the
Jalisco coast.
We recognized a series of marine notches, wave-
cut platforms, and remnants of marine terraces along
the Jalisco coast of Mexico along about 153 km, from
Barra de Navidad to Tomatlan that reflect relative sea-
level changes (Fig. 1). Emerged marine shorelines are
the depositional and erosional remains of abandoned
shorelines (Lajoie, 1986). The number of emerged
shorelines, their spacing, and their character are a
function of tectonic movement and regional and
global sea-level change (eustatic change). The best-
preserved records of sea level do not come from stable
coastlines but rather from coasts experiencing steady,
long-term uplift. Few studies on Holocene eustatic
and relative sea-level changes along the southwestern
Pacific coasts of Mexico exist (Curray et al., 1969;
Ortlieb, 1987). Moreover, no published studies are
available of either emerged shorelines in this region or
of previously reported radiocarbon dates for emerged
coastal features in southern Mexico. This paper
presents the preliminary results from a study of
Holocene-emerged shorelines, marine notches, and
their tectonic implications along the Jalisco coast.
We present the first geomorphic study and preliminary
radiocarbon data of emerged shorelines in this region.
We discuss field-based results and the possible mech-
anisms for coastal emergence and propose a model for
Holocene tectonic uplift of the Jalisco coast.
2. Setting of the Jalisco coast
2.1. Tectonics
The Jalisco coast is located along an active con-
vergent margin where the Rivera oceanic plate sub-
ducts beneath the North American Plate along the
Middle American trench (Fig. 1). The Rivera Plate, a
young plate (sea floor age is 9 Ma (Klitgord and
Mammerickx, 1982; Kostoglodov and Bandy, 1995)),
moves to the N–NE with respect to the Rivera–North
America Plate boundary, at rates of 2.0 and 3.3 cm/
year, increasing from north to south (DeMets et al.,
1994). Other studies suggest higher convergence rates
up to 5.0 cm/year (Bandy, 1992; Kostoglodov and
Bandy, 1995; Kostoglodov et al., 1997; Bandy et al.,
1997, 1998). Recent studies show that the Rivera
Plate subducts below the Jalisco Block of the North
American Plate, with a shallow 10j dip angle down to
about a depth of 20 km in the seismogenic zone; the
dip gradually increases up to 46j at 65 km depth
(Pardo and Suarez, 1993; Hurtado et al., 1997).
The Jalisco Block in SW Mexico is bounded inland
on the NE by the Tepic–Zacoalco Rift (NW–SE) and
on the SW by the Colima Rift (NE–SW) (Fig. 1).
Rifting and volcanism are associated with movement
of the Jalisco Block away from the North America
Plate toward the NW (Luhr et al., 1985; Allan, 1986).
The rate of movement of the Jalisco Block relative to
North America may be very low ( < 5 mm/year;
DeMets and Stein, 1990; Bandy and Pardo, 1994).
2.2. Morphology and sea-level history
2.2.1. Morphology
The Jalisco coast stretches along 180 km and
subparallels the Middle American trench. The conti-
nental shelf here is relatively narrow, locally < 1 km
but reaching up to 2 km. The distance from the trench
to the coast averages f 50 km, but increases to
about 120 km near Bahia de Banderas (Fig. 1). The
coastal landscape is characterized by cliffs and rocky
promontories (mostly shaped on granite, rhyolite, and
breccia), alternating with narrow beaches. Inland,
sparse low plains with lagoons and estuaries, highly
dissected hills and high mountains (up to ca. 2000 m)
characterized the landscape. Some of these highly
dissected hills are apparently remnants of emerged
marine terraces that extend intermittently along the
Jalisco coast. Although not yet surveyed with preci-
sion nor dated, these terrace remnants show consis-
tent elevations ca. 40, 60, f 80, and 100 m amsl
(topographic map estimates). Terrace remnants along
this coast are highly dissected and weathered, expos-
ing outcrops with a thick regolith layer on top of the
terraces surfaces. Beach deposits were missing from
the terrace surfaces, most probably washed away by
streams and runoff. We speculate that the poor
preservation of these terraces is related to climatic
conditions (subtropical climate) and long time expo-
sure, and that the apparent age of the terraces might
be pre-Holocene (Ramırez-Herrera et al., 1998a,b).
We suggest further study of these features that
are very interesting but beyond the scope of this
work.
Fig. 2. Historic seismicity and rupture zones along the Jalisco coast. Dates indicate main historical events and their magnitude. Shaded encircle
areas show rupture zones for the 1932 and 1995 events (Pacheco et al., 1997).
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / Geomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304294
eomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304 295
2.2.2. Sea level history
Little is known about Holocene sea level along the
southern Pacific coasts of Mexico. During the late
Quaternary (stages 5a/c and 5e, 82/105 and 120 ka,
respectively), two sea-level maxima have been de-
scribed for NW Mexico; but evidence of only one
transgression, which occurred after the sea level
maximum (stage 5e), is distinguished in the Baja
California Peninsula (Ortlieb, 1987). A study in the
coast of Nayarit and Sinaloa (Curray et al., 1969),
south of the Gulf of California, suggests the following
chronology of events during the late Holocene. At ca.
18,000 years BP, sea level was at ca. � 125 m.
Between 18,000–7000 years BP, a rapid sea level
rise took place to ca. � 10 m. The middle Holocene
(7000–3600 years BP) was characterized by slower
rise of sea level to ca. � 2 m. Between 4750 and 3600
years BP occurred the stabilization of shorelines near
Nayarit and Sinaloa. Between 3600 and 1500 years
BP, relative sea level may have been near present
level, or could have risen rapidly to present level. By
1500 years BP, sea level reached its present level
(Curray et al., 1969). Globally, sea level has been
nearly stable during the past 6000 years. With most
deglaciation complete by about 6 ka, subsequent sea-
level changes are interpreted to be the consequence of
seismotectonic effects, isostatic adjustments, and cli-
matic changes (Pirazzoli, 1996).
2.3. Historic earthquakes and coastal movement
Large thrust earthquakes along the Mexican sub-
duction zone occur on a shallow N–E (10–15j)dipping plate boundary because of sudden slip along
the seismogenic zone between the Rivera and Cocos
Plates and the overriding North America Plate (Singh
et al., 1985). Along the Jalisco coast, three Ms>7.5
earthquakes have occurred during the past century: the
3 and 18 June 1932 Jalisco earthquakes (Ms 8.1 and
7.8, respectively) and the most recent 9 October 1995
Colima–Jalisco (Mw 8.0) earthquake (Fig. 2). Earth-
quakes of the nineteenth century have less reliable
location and magnitude estimates (Kostoglodov and
Ponce, 1994).
The 1932 earthquakes broke the Rivera–North
American Plate boundary (Singh et al., 1985) and
produced coastal subsidence estimated at 40–75 cm
between Barra de Navidad and south of Tecoman,
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / G
southern Jalisco, and Colima coasts, according to
Cumming (1933) report.
The October 1995 earthquake (Mw 8.0) located
near Manzanillo ruptured part of the Rivera–North
America plate boundary (Melbourne et al., 1997; Ortiz
et al., 1999). Coseismic subsidence of 80F 14 mm (2)
at Manzanillo, Colima, was estimated from GPS
surveys performed before and after the earthquake
(Melbourne et al., 1997). Pressure-gauge records indi-
cated subsidence of 44 cm in Barra de Navidad and 11
cm in Manzanillo, Colima (Kostoglodov et al., 1997).
Historical data are insufficient to determine earth-
quake recurrence periods for this region (Nishenko
and Singh, 1987). Singh et al. (1985) proposed an
earthquake recurrence period of 77 years for the
Jalisco coast based on historical earthquake records.
Although large earthquakes occurred in the region in
1806 (M 7.5), 1818 (M 7.7), and 1900 (M 7.6, 7.1)
(Singh et al., 1981), the rupture zones of these earth-
quakes have not been established (Pacheco et al.,
1997). The study of past earthquakes, inferred from
the geologic and geomorphic record, would improve
our understanding on the time–space behavior of
earthquakes along the Jalisco coast.
3. Holocene marine notches
On tectonically active coasts, marine notches are
one of the most precise indicators of rates and
patterns of uplift (Rust and Kershaw, 2000). On
coasts with a moderate tidal range, the most common
notch profiles have recumbent V-shaped or U-shaped
morphologies. In sheltered sites, the depth of marine
notches increase gradually above the notch floor to a
most convex part of the notch. The retreat point or
vertex, the most indented part of a notch, is located
near mean sea level (Fig. 3). From that point, the
depth decreases gradually upward and becomes neg-
ligible at the top of the notch near the highest tide
level. In exposed sites, the elevation of marine
notches amsl increases because wave action regularly
exceeds high-tide level in open and exposed coast-
lines (Pirazzoli, 1996).
Marine notches are best developed in the littoral
zone where the intersections of rock, air, and sea are
frequent and regular. Marine-notch development is
mainly related to bioerosion, however, marine notches
Fig. 3. Emerged tidal notch and abrasion platform cut into granite by a former Holocene sea level near Barra de Navidad, southern Jalisco coast.
Tidal notch profile: (A) top, (B) retreat point, (C) base. Ruler bars are 10 cm each. Retreat point (C) is located between 0.62 and 0.95 m above
mean sea level. Local tide range is 0.536 m. Fossil intertidal barnacles were sampled from this site.
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / Geomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304296
can be formed by abrasion and by differential erosion.
Zones of rapid marine-notch development correlate
well with zones of major eroding organisms. The
maximum density of grazing organisms is near mean
sea level. Rates of erosion of 0.2–5.0 mm/year have
been reported in the literature, the most frequent
values being 1.0–1.5 mm/year in the tropics (Fair-
bridge, 1968; Pirazzoli, 1996).
3.1. Field methods
We measured the relative elevations of marine
notches above mean sea level between the Barra de
Navidad and Cuitzmala sites with an Abney level
and stadia above water levels, considering tide level
at the time and date of observations. We estimated a
measurement error of ca. F 20 cm. One of the
problems in measuring elevations of marine notches
is related to the wave run-up, particularly in exposed
sites. In sheltered shores, such as Barra de Navidad,
the effect of wave run-up is significantly reduced
because this coast is protected from the open ocean
winds. In order to effectively diminish the wave run-
up effect when measuring notch elevations in ex-
posed sites, we performed measurements at low tide
and during the morning when winds were calm and
the wave run-up effect decreases on this coast. Some
notches located seaward were not accessible due to
the wave action and elevations could only be esti-
mated to the nearest level. Unfortunately, the nearest
tide gauge is located 40 km south of the study area
on a less-sheltered shore in the Manzanillo Bay, the
data for which was available from the archives of the
Institute of Geophysics at the National University of
Mexico (UNAM). Calculated mean tide level at
Manzanillo is 0.5 m, and 0.8 m at the Puerto Vallarta
coast.
We considered the influence of El Nino Southern
Oscillation (ENSO) on the sea level of the Pacific
coast because one of our field seasons (1998) oc-
curred during a strong El Nino event. We estimated
the ENSO influence on sea level during the 1997–
1998 field season using the image of the Pacific
ocean taken by the TOPEX/Poseidon satellite that
showed the sea surface along the SW Mexican coast
14–32 cm above normal. We used these corrections
to determine mean sea level at the time and date of
survey.
Table 1
Elevations and ages of emerged notches along the Jalisco coast
Location Averaged
elevations
(m)a
Elevation
amsl (m)
Radiocarbon
age
1 Barra de
Navidad
notchb
0.46 to 0.6b 0.6 to 0.9 Post 0 year BP
(ca. 1959 AD)d
2 Cuitzmala
notch
4.5 to 4.7 4.5 to 4.7 1262F 51
years BPc
Cuitzmala
sea caves
f 4.5 f 4.5 No datable
material
Cuitzmala
boulders
f 1.5 to 2.0 1.5 to 2.0 No datable
material
(8x 6� 6 m)
notches
3 Tecuan
notches
f 3.0 to 3.5e f 3.0 to 3.5 No datable
material
4 Benito Juarez
and Arroyo
Seco notches
0.8 to 1.0 0.8 to 1.0 No datable
material
5 Punta Farallon
notch
f 4.0 f 4.0 No datable
material
a Elevation data corrected for tide level at time of measurement;
Measurement error estimates F 0.2 m. Mean tide range for
locations near Manzanillo ca. F 0.5 m, and F 0.8 m for locations
near to Puerto Vallarta.b El Nino Correction (1998) + 0.14 to 0.32 m.c AA-22193.d 109% of modern (Beta-119880).e Above mean high tide level. amsl = above mean sea level.
eomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304 297
3.2. Marine notches along the Jalisco coast
We identified a suite of emerged notches along the
Jalisco coast between Punta Farallon and Barra
de Navidad (19j28VN, 105j04VW and 19j11VN,
104j40VW) (Fig. 1).
3.2.1. Barra de Navidad notch
A well-developed, slightly emerged notch cut into
the base of granite cliffs is located in the inner shore
of a lagoon protected from the open wave action by a
bar near Barra de Navidad (Fig. 1). At Barra de
Navidad, local tidal range is at ca. 0.5 m. The Barra
de Navidad notch extends 250 m along an almost
vertical cliff (4.6 m high). The retreat point of the
emerged notch reaches an elevation between 0.6 and
0.9 m amsl (Table 1). The notch profile at Barra de
Navidad shows a well-preserved floor. It exposes an
abrasion platform cut into granite. Even during high-
est high tides, the notch and abrasion platform are
still exposed above sea level (Fig. 3). On sheltered
shores, the retreat point (the most indented part of a
notch) is usually situated near mean sea level (Piraz-
zoli, 1996).
3.2.2. Cuitzmala notches
A series of notches cut into volcanic breccia
(composed of porphyritic andesite in a lithic matrix)
and andesitic lavas are exposed on an open shore near
the mouth of the Cuitzmala River (Fig. 4). Winds in
this area vary from SW to SE during the year. The
shore here is moderately exposed to the NW, where
waves regularly exceed high-tide level and may in-
crease the elevation of the marine notches (Pirazzoli,
1996). Marine notches here are cut on near vertical
cliff faces (6–8 m high), and their retreat points reach
elevations ca. 4.5 to 4.7 m amsl (Fig. 4). We identified
other indicators of emergent shorelines in this area,
such as sea caves and a sea arch cut in volcanic
bedrock at elevations ca. 4.5 m. Several breccia
boulders (about 8� 6� 6 m) along the shore showed
an indented surface at ca. 1.5 to 2.0 m amsl that is
most probably a marine notch (Table 1).
3.2.3. El Tecuan notches
We recognized other notches along the Jalisco
coast. At a highly exposed site at El Tecuan, a
spectacular abrasion notch that is cut into breccia
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / G
shows double erosional benches and honeycombs on
the cliff profile. Although this notch reaches an
elevation of ca. 3.0 to 3.5 m above mean high tide
level, it is highly exposed to wave action; and local
accounts suggest that the highest tides reach the notch
and that breaking waves occasionally cover the ero-
sional benches and abrasion platform (Table 1).
3.2.4. Benito Juarez notches
At Benito Juarez, emerged notches are cut into
breccia at 1.0 m amsl. Tidal range at this locality is ca.
0.5 m, indicating that this notch has emerged. About
500 m seaward from the notch, several island stacks
also show notches and abrasion platforms emerged
above mean sea level (we were unable to measure the
island notches due to strong wave action). Northwest
of Benito Juarez, at the mouth of the Arroyo Seco
River, an abrasion platform and notches are cut into
andesites about 1 m amsl (Table 1).
Fig. 4. Emerged tidal notches cut into volcanic bedrock and conglomerates near Cuitzmala. Tidal notches are on almost vertical cliff faces and
their retreat points reach elevations ca. 4.5 m above mean sea level. Photographs show the ca. 4.5 m uplifted notch seawards (A), and the same
notch extended inland (B). Tidal range is between 0.5 and 0.8 m. Symbols as in Fig. 3.
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / Geomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304298
eomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304 299
3.2.5. Punta Farallon notch
At Punta Farallon, a well-developed notch with a
wave-cut platform at its base is cut into conglomerate
along a 20-m-high cliff face. We also observed a
modern notch at the foot of a paleowave-cut platform
at ca. 1.0 m above mean tide level. The coast at Punta
Farallon is very exposed, and the height of the
emerged marine notch (ca. 4.0 m) probably differed
from mean sea level at the time it was cut (Table 1).
Unfortunately, the majority of these notches and
wave-cut platforms are barren of organic material
for radiocarbon dating. Advanced dating techniques,
such as the use of cosmogenic isotope dating, should
be applied here in order to determine exposure ages of
these features.
3.3. Radiocarbon dating of Jalisco marine notches
Fossil intertidal barnacles, oyster shells, and red
algae (Balanus identified by Dr. A. Garcıa Cubas and
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / G
Fig. 5. Elevations of the retreat points of the notches along the Jalisco coa
segments. Radiocarbon dates for fossil organisms found on Cuitzmala (C)
(Post 0 year BP, or ca. AD 1959). Symbols: F = Punta Farallon, C =Cuit
masl =meters above sea level. Graphic indicates average regional: MSL=
highest high water level (for site location, see Fig. 1).
Dr. M. Reguero, UNAM; and red algae identified by
Dr. S. Tudhope from the University of Edinburgh)
were collected at the base of the Barra de Navidad
notch and inside the Cuitzmala notch at elevations
corresponding to former low and mean tide level,
respectively. All barnacles, oyster shells, and algae
were clearly located above mean sea level at emerged
notches (Fig. 5).
The AMS radiocarbon age for the red algae sample
collected at Cuitzmala is 1262F 51 14C years BP (cal.
AD 660–940) (AA-22193), suggesting that the emer-
gence of the Cuitzmala coast occurred at about that
time.
Shell samples from Barra de Navidad were ana-
lyzed for 14C activity using standard methods. The
13C/12C corrected age (Beta Analytic, Beta-119880)
obtained from the oyster shells sample at Barra de
Navidad is 109% of modern (Post 0 year BP, ca. AD
1959). Because barnacles collected from the same site
were encrusted on top of oyster shells, we assumed
st and sea level. Elevation uncertainty limits are marked by vertical
are 1262F 51 years BP, Barra de Navidad (BN) 109% of modern
zmala, BJ =Benito Juarez, T =El Tecuan, BN=Barra de Navidad;
mean sea level, MHWL=mean high water level, MHHWL=mean
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / Geomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304300
that the barnacles and shells were the same age.
However, the vertical zonation of barnacles indicates
that their living conditions can extend above the
maximum tidal range, and in most cases indicate
super-zero elevations. This helps explain the anoma-
lous radiocarbon date at Barra de Navidad.
4. Mechanisms of coastal emergence
4.1. Holocene tectonic uplift
The Cuitzmala radiocarbon age and marine notch
elevation indicate a relative sea-level fall on this
segment of the Jalisco coast during the last 1300
years BP. The global history of relative sea-level
change indicates that sea level has been at its present
level since 6 ka (Pirazzoli, 1996). Along the northern
coast of Jalisco, sea level was near or at present
height by 3600–1500 years BP (Curray et al., 1969),
and no major isostatic adjustments and climate
changes have been reported for the area for that
period of time. Two mechanisms might be involved
in the emergence of the Jalisco marine notches
intermittently exposed along 40 km of coast: (i)
rapid uplift produced by large-magnitude, late-Holo-
cene earthquakes generated on the active plate
boundary, and/or (ii) long-term uplift of the coast
produced by the permanent deformation of the over-
riding plate because of the subduction of the Rivera
Plate (Fig. 2). We discuss these two mechanisms
below.
First, rapid uplift movements might be coseismic
because the preservation of in situ sublittoral and
midlittoral shells, barnacles, and algae in the supra-
littoral zone would be enhanced by a very rapid,
relative sea-level change (Pirazzoli, 1996). Intertidal
organisms, red algae, were found in their growth
position and well preserved on the Cuitzmala notch.
The preservation of these organisms may be due to
rapid uplift of the coast associated with shallow, large-
magnitude earthquakes located close to the coast.
Similar coastal features produced by coseismic uplifts
have been observed in other parts of the world along
active subducting plate margins: for example, New
Zealand (Berryman et al., 1989; Ota et al., 1991),
Japan (Kawana and Pirazzoli, 1985), and Alaska
(Plafker and Rubin, 1967).
Alternatively, long-term deformation not directly
associated with earthquakes might also be a mech-
anism for coastal uplift in Jalisco. Elastic strain
deformation can be accumulated during the inter-
seismic period causing upward flexing of much of
the accretionary prism and adjacent local coastal
areas. However, this strain would be released dur-
ing the subsequent earthquake, producing abrupt
coseismic submergence on coastal areas. This sim-
ple model of interseimic and coseismic deformation
has been used to demonstrate the elastic behavior
of the overriding lithospheric plate on the Casca-
dian subduction zone where the Juan de Fuca
oceanic Plate underthrusts and where paleoseismic
records report coseismic subsidence (Atwater,
1992).
Rapid uplift might partially explain coastal emer-
gence evident by the Cuitzmala notches. Radiocarbon
dating of the ca. 4.5-m elevated Cuitzmala marine
notch indicates the time of uplift, inferred to be rapid
because of the presence of well-preserved marine
organisms found in their growth position. Uplift might
have occurred during a large-magnitude earthquake at
1262F 51 years BP (cal. AD 660–940). Other
emerged notches, exposed in the study region at
different elevations above mean sea level (ca. 1,
1.5–2, and 4 m) might have a similar history of
sudden uplifts associated with earthquakes. Unfortu-
nately, most of these features were barren of datable
material, and no ages could be used to determine
uplift rates. The absence of intertidal organisms on
these notches raises the question regarding whether a
rapid or a slow uplift raised these features above mean
sea level.
On the other hand, the elevation of the Cuitzmala
notch at 4.5 m amsl could be explained by a large-
magnitude shallow earthquake or a combination of a
series of shallow earthquakes located near the coast
and/or long-term tectonic uplift. None of these
hypotheses can be proven at this point because
historical records of earthquakes in this area do
not go back far enough to prove or disprove these
hypotheses.
The Barra de Navidad notch, elevated at ca. 0.6–
0.9 m, shows an anomalous (109% of modern)
radiocarbon age. According to this date, this shoreline
could have emerged a few decades before or after AD
1959. This date could as well correspond to an
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / Geomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304 301
earthquake that occurred in the 19th century. The
historical record indicates the occurrence of other
larger earthquakes in the 19th century (1806, 1818,
1837, 1875, 1900), nevertheless, the effects of these
earthquakes on the coast have not been documented.
However, the vertical zonation of barnacles indicates
that their living conditions can extend above the
maximum tidal range. This might be a probable
reason for the anomalous modern radiocarbon age of
the Barra de Navidad raised notch.
The spatial-height distribution of the raised notches
along the Jalisco coast illustrated in Fig. 5 suggests an
anomalous non-uniform spatial arrangement that
might be caused by differential uplift along the coast.
This non-uniform distribution could be related with
the presence of faults that make up the blocky
structure of the Jalisco megablock (Lugo-Hubp and
Ortiz-Perez, 1980; Ferrari and Rosas-Elguera, 2000;
Ferrari et al., 2000).
4.2. Historic interseismic and coseismic observations
Observations of the historic earthquakes of 1932
and 1995 showed that coseismic subsidence was
produced along the Jalisco coast (Cumming, 1933;
Melbourne et al., 1997). After the 1932 earthquake,
Cumming’s (1933) report indicates local coastal sub-
sidence of about 40–75 cm near Manzanillo, south of
Jalisco, produced by the1932 earthquakes. The arrival
of a tsunami was also reported by locals just after the
earthquake (Cumming, 1933).
In October 1995, initial coseismic coastal subsi-
dence (up to 20 cm at Chamela) was measured using
geodetic-GPS and tide gauge data (Hutton et al.,
1997). Measurements made barely 2 months after the
earthquake demonstrate a period of rapid uplift, with
some sites recovering almost the entire coseismic
drop (Hutton et al., 1997). Thus, a detailed GPS
survey before, during, and after the 1995 (Mw= 8)
Colima earthquake showed postseismic motion rang-
ing from 18% to 84% of the coseismic slip with
postseismic displacements decaying rapidly (Hutton
et al., 1998). GPS results indicate that almost 3 years
after the earthquake, the coastal coseismic subsi-
dence reported had been nearly completely recovered
during the postseismic and interseismic periods (Hut-
ton et al., 1997, 1998; O. Sanchez, UNAM, personal
communication).
5. Discussion
Studies at other plate boundaries around the Pacific
Rim showed that Holocene- and Pleistocene-emerged
shorelines recorded both eustatic and coseismic rela-
tive sea-level changes (Plafker, 1969; Matsuda et al.,
1978; Ota et al., 1991 Berryman, 1993). For example,
the Papua New Guinea coastline, which has one of the
most detailed records of emergent shorelines, shows
that meter-scale uplifts represent great earthquakes
(Ota and Chappell, 1996). Large coseismic uplifts
can be identified from the geomorphic record; how-
ever, identifying less than 1-m uplifts from the geo-
morphic record is not possible because the effects of
an instantaneous movement cannot be distinguish
clearly from those events occurring over decades or
centuries.
We believe that long-term slow uplift might also
have contributed to the total net emergence of former
Holocene shorelines on the Jalisco coast, although
distinguishing the amount of coseismic uplift from
that of the slow uplift produced during long-term
periods is not possible. The mechanism that explains
uplift produced during interseismic cycles and during
the long-term period on the coastal area, as discussed
above, can be related to the shortening of the accre-
tionary prism and a flexural uplift of the overriding
plate. Although the accretionary prism on this portion
of the margin is relatively thin, then the deformation
occurring on the overriding plate would be small also;
the possibility of an increase of buoyancy of the
subducting material might lead to an uplift of the
plate margin in the long term (Buiter et al., 2001).
Moreover, emerged shorelines clearly experienced
overall uplift; and we found no evidence of a pro-
longed interseismic and of long-term subsidence.
Finally, although coseismic centimeter-scale coast-
al subsidence was reported for the 1932 and 1995
earthquakes (Cumming, 1933; Hutton et al., 1997,
1998; Kostoglodov et al., 1997), the rapid postseismic
and interseismic recovery indicates a general trend to
tectonic uplift during long-term periods. Apparently,
interseismic and long-term uplift has been an impor-
tant, if not the most important factor, in the emergence
of the Jalisco coast. We propose a model for the
Jalisco coast in which (based on geomorphic, histor-
ical, and GPS observations) the coast subsides during
large earthquakes located offshore. This coseismic
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / Geomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304302
subsidence is rapidly recovered during a short period
of about 1–5 years. Then, during interseismic and
long-term periods, the coast is uplifted slowly by
upward flexing produced by the elastic deformation
of the overriding plate. This amount of long-term
uplift, although slow, does not seem to be completely
lost during coseismic subsidence produced by subse-
quent earthquake events. The possibility of large-
magnitude earthquakes producing tectonic uplift is
not excluded from this model. If earthquakes are
shallow and close to the coast, they are capable of
producing coastal uplift. Large coseismic uplift has
occurred in adjacent coastal segments of the subduc-
tion zone. The 1985 earthquake produced up to 1.10
m of coastal uplift in the adjacent Michoacan coastal
segment (Bodin and Klinger, 1986). However, we
found no further evidence of sudden uplift apart from
in situ intertidal organisms present on the Cuitzmala
notch and the history of cosesismic uplifts that
occurred on the adjacent coast of Michoacan. There-
fore, at this point, coseismic uplift cannot be proven.
However, while it is unfortunate that we have only two
radiocarbon dates, these dates for the Cuitzmala and
Barra de Navidad notches are consistent with their
elevations, showing a younger age for the lower Barra
de Navidad notch and an older age for the higher
Cuitzmala paleoshoreline. The record of emerged
coastal notches suggests a cumulative long-term slow
uplift rate estimated at 3 mm/year.
We have raised questions and suggested possible
explanations for Holocene uplift of the Jalisco coast in
SW Mexico. However, further work should be per-
formed on the absolute dating of emerged shorelines
to determine uplift rates and perhaps establish earth-
quake recurrence intervals for the Jalisco coast. The
lack of material suitable for radiocarbon dating on
most of these notches warrant further work along with
the introduction of other dating techniques on abraded
landforms. Cosmogenic isotopes might prove to be a
valuable tool in providing exposure ages for abrasion
platforms and marine terraces (Hancock et al., 1999;
Perg et al., 2001).
6. Conclusions
Intertidal notch elevations and their radiocarbon
age, first ever reported for this sector of the Mexican
active plate margin, show a relative sea-level ‘‘fall’’
in Jalisco during the late Holocene (at least during
the last 1300 years BP). Emerged marine notches,
ranging from 1 to 4.5 m in elevation, record coastal
emergence since at least 1262F 51 years BP. We
suggest that Holocene coastal uplift, registered by
emerged marine notches, represents (i) slow tectonic
uplift during the long-term period, and/or (ii) prob-
ably rapid tectonic uplift caused by great shallow
earthquakes that might have occurred close to the
Jalisco coast.
If the history of relative sea-level change in Jalisco
is similar to histories on other northern Mexican
coasts and globally, most of the relative sea-level fall
that we measured would be caused by tectonic uplift
of the Jalisco coast.
Although offshore earthquakes may produce local
centimeter-scale coastal subsidence along the Jalisco
coast, complete postseismic and interseismic recovery
appears to follow (Hutton et al., 1997, 1998) leading
to general coastal uplift. Slow long-term uplift is
considered to be the most important factor to the total
net vertical motion, uplift, along the Jalisco coast. We
have found no evidence of coastal interseismic and
long-term subsidence.
Judging by the morphologic evidence and the
radiocarbon date of the 4.5-m elevation Holocene
notches, we propose a Holocene long-term trend for
tectonic uplift at estimated rates f 3 mm/year along
the Jalisco coast. Further work on the precise dating of
emerged notches and terraces is necessary to deter-
mine uplift rates in this area.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by California State
University-Long Beach, UNAM, and CONACYT.
Mike Summerfield and Alan Nelson provided val-
uable comments on an earlier version of this manu-
script. Thanks to Steven Lefton for the helpful
comments on this manuscript that helped us to
improve the final version. We thank J. Zamorano, R.
Reyna, R. Gutierrez, E. Leon, and M. Ortiz for their
assistance in the field. O. Sanchez provided tide
ranges. The University of Arizona Radiocarbon
Laboratory and Beta Analytic produced radiocarbon
dates. Thanks to R.A. Mastron, N. Pinter, and P.G.
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / Geomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304 303
Silva for their valuable comments and reviews of this
manuscript.
References
Allan, J.F., 1986. Geology of the northern Colima and Zacoalco
grabens, southwest Mexico: late Cenozoic rifting in the Mexican
Volcanic Belt. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 97,
473–485.
Atwater, B.F., 1992. Geologic evidence for earthquakes during the
past 200 years along the Copalis River, southern coastal Wash-
ington. Journal of Geophysical Research 97, 1901–1919.
Bandy, W., 1992. Geological and geophysical investigation of the
Rivera-Cocos Plate boundary: implications for plate fragmenta-
tion. PhD Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station.
255 pp.
Bandy, W.L., Pardo, M., 1994. Statistical examination of the exis-
tence and relative motion of the Jalisco and southern Mexico
blocks. Tectonics 13, 755–768.
Bandy, W., Kostoglodov, V., Singh, S.K., Pacheco, J., Urrutia-
Fucugauchi, J., 1997. Implications of the October 1995 Coli-
ma–Jalisco Mexico earthquakes on the Rivera–North America
Euler vector. Geophysical Research Letters 24 (4), 485–488.
Bandy, W.L., Kostoglodov, V., Mortera-Gutierrez, C.A., 1998.
Southwest migration of the instantaneous Rivera–Pacific Euler
pole since 0.78 Ma. Geofısica Internacional 37 (3), 153–169.
Berryman, K.R., 1993. Age, height, and deformation of Holocene
marine terraces at Mahia Peninsula, Hikurangi subduction mar-
gin, New Zealand. Tectonics 12, 1347–1364.
Berryman, K.R., Ota, Y., Hull, A.G., 1989. Holocene paleo
seismcity in the fold and thrust belt of the Hikurangi subduc-
tion zone, eastern North Island, New Zealand. Tectonophysics
163, 185–195.
Bodin, P., Klinger, T., 1986. Coastal uplift and mortality of inter-
tidal organisms caused by the September 1985 Mexico earth-
quakes. Science 233, 1071–1073.
Buiter, S.J.H., Govers, R., Wortel, M.J.R., 2001. A modeling study
of vertical surface displacements at convergent plate margins.
Geophysical Journal International 147, 415–427.
Corona-Esquivel, R., Ortega-Gutierrez, F., Martinez-Reyes, J., Cen-
teno-Garcia, E., 1988. Evidencias de levantamiento tectonico
asociado con el sismo del 19 de septiembre de 1985, en la
region de Caleta de Campos, Estado de Michoacan. Revista
del Instituto de Geologia, UNAM 7, 106–111.
Cumming, J.L., 1933. Los terremotos de junio de 1932 en los esta-
dos de Colima y Jalisco. Universidad de Mexico, Mexico D.F.,
VI (31–32), 68–104.
Curray, J.R., Emmel, F.J., Crampton, P.J.S., 1969. Holocene history
of a strand plain, lagoonal coast, Nayarit, Mexico. Lagunas
Costeras, UN Simposio, Memorias del Simposio Internacional
Lagunas Costeras. UNAM-UNESCO, Noviembre 28–30, 1967,
Mexico D.F., 63–100.
DeMets, C., Stein, S., 1990. Present-day kinematics of the Rivera
Plate and implications for the tectonics in southwestern Mexico.
Journal of Geophysical Research 95, 21931–21948.
DeMets, Ch., Gordon, R., Argus, D., Stein, S., 1994. Effect of recent
revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of
current plate motions. Geophysical Research Letters 21 (20),
2191–2194.
Fairbridge, R.W., 1968. The Encyclopedia of Geomorphology.
Reinhold Group, USA. 1295 pp.
Ferrari, L., Rosas-Elguera, J., 2000. Late Miocene to Quaternary
extension at the northern boundary of the Jalisco Block,
western Mexico; the Tepic–Zacoalco Rift revised. In: Delga-
do-Granados, H., Aguirre-Diaz, G.J., Stock, J.M. (Eds.), Cen-
ozoic Tectonics and Volcanism of Mexico Special Paper, vol.
334. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, USA,
pp. 41–63.
Ferrari, L., Pasquare, G., Venegas-Salgado, S., Romero-Rios, F.,
2000. Geology of the western Mexican volcanic belt and
adjacent Sierra Madre Occidental and Jalisco Block. In: Del-
gado-Granados, H., Aguirre-Diaz, G.J., Stock, J.M. (Eds.),
Cenozoic Tectonics and Volcanism of Mexico Special Paper,
vol. 334. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, USA,
pp. 65–83.
Hancock, G.S., Anderson, R.S., Chadwick, O.A., Finkel, R.C.,
1999. Dating fluvial terraces with 10Be and 26Al profiles: ap-
plication to the Wind River, Wyoming. Geomorphology 27,
41–60.
Hurtado, A., Domınguez, J., Suarez, G., VanDecar, J., Kuenhel, R.,
Solomon, S., Reyes, G., 1997. Geometrıa de la subduccion de la
placa de Rivera. Resumenes y Programa de la Reunion Anual de
la Union Geofısica Mexicana, 1997. GEOS 17 (4), 260.
Hutton, W., Sanchez, O., DeMets, Ch., Stock, J., Suarez, G., 1997.
Deformation of the Jalisco/Colima region following the 9 Oc-
tober 1995 Mw=8 Manzanillo earthquake: GPS and tide gauge
results. Resumenes y Programa de la Reunion Anual de la
Union Geofısica Mexicana, 1997. GEOS 17 (4), 231–232.
Hutton, W., DeMets, Ch., Sanchez, O., Stock, J., Suarez, G., 1998.
Implications of continuing postseismic motion of the Jalisco/
Colima region following the 9 October 1995 (Mw= 8) Manza-
nillo earthquake. Resumenes y Programa de la Reunion Anual
de la Union Geofısica Mexicana, 1998. GEOS 17 (4), 297.
Kawana, T., Pirazzoli, P.A., 1985. Holocene coastline changes and
seismic uplift in Okinawa Island, the Ryukyus, Japan. Zeichsrift
fur Geomorphology 57, 11–31.
Klitgord, K., Mammerickx, J., 1982. East Pacific Rise: magnetic
anomaly and bathymetric framework. Journal of Geophysical
Research 87, 6725–6750.
Kostoglodov, V., Bandy, W., 1995. Seismotectonic constraints
on the convergence rate between the Rivera and North
American Plates. Journal of Geophysical Research 100 (B9),
17977–17989.
Kostoglodov, V., Ponce, L., 1994. Relationship between subduction
and seismicity in the Mexican part of Middle America Trench.
Journal of Geophysical Research 99 (B1), 729–742.
Kostoglodov, V., Singh, S.K., Gorbatov, A., Pacheco, J.F., Filinov,
A., Figueroa, M.O., 1997. October 9, 1995, Mw 8.0 Colima–
Jalisco earthquake: new constraints on the coseismic slip distri-
bution. Resumenes y Programa de la Reunion Anual de la
Union Geofısica Mexicana, 1997. GEOS 17 (4), 259–260.
Lajoie, K., 1986. Coastal tectonics. Active Tectonics. Studies in
M.T. Ramırez-Herrera et al. / Geomorphology 58 (2004) 291–304304
Geophysics. National Academy Press, Washington D.C., USA,
pp. 95–124.
Lugo-Hubp, J., Ortiz-Perez, M., 1980. Analisis geomorfologico-
estructural del conjunto montanoso de la region de Cabo Cor-
rientes, Jalisco. Boletin de la Sociedad Geologica Mexicana XLI
(1–2), 1–13.
Luhr, J.F., Nelson, S.A., Allan, J.F., Carmichael, I.S.E., 1985. Ac-
tive rifting in southwestern Mexico: manifestations of an incip-
ient eastward spreading-ridge jump. Geology 13, 54–57.
Matsuda, T., Ota, Y., Ando, M., Yonekura, N., 1978. Fault mech-
anism and recurrence time of major earthquakes in southern
Kanto district, Japan, as deduced from coastal terrace data. Geo-
logical Society of America Bulletin 89, 1610–1618.
Melbourne, T., Carmichael, I., DeMets, C., Hudnut, K., Sanchez,
O., Stock, J., Suarez, G., Webb, F., 1997. The geodetic signature
of the M8.0 October 9, 1995, Jalisco subduction earthquake.
Geophysical Research Letters 24 (6), 715–718.
Nishenko, S.P., Singh, S.K., 1987. Conditional probabilities for the
recurrence of large and great interplate earthquakes along the
Mexican subduction zone. Bulletin of the Seismological Society
of America 77, 2095–2114.
Ortiz, M., Singh, S.K., Pacheco, J., Kostoglodov, V., 1999. Rupture
length of October 9, 1995 Colima–Jalisco earthquake (Mw 8)
estimated from tsunami data. Geophysical Research Letters 25
(15), 2857–2860.
Ortlieb, L., 1987. Neotectonique et variations du niveau marine au
Quaternaire dan la region du Golfe de Californie, Mexique. Ed.
del’Orstrom, Paris, France. 762 pp.
Ota, Y., Chappell, J., 1996. Late Quaternary coseismic uplift
events on the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea, deduces
from coral terrace data. Journal of Geophysical Research 101
(B3), 6071–6082.
Ota, Y., Hull, A.G., Berryman, R., 1991. Coseismic uplift of Hol-
ocene marine terraces in the Pakarae River area, eastern North
Island, New Zealand. Quaternary Research 35, 331–346.
Pacheco, J., Singh, S.K., Domınguez, J., Hurtado, A., Quintanar, L.,
Jimenez, Z., Yamamoto, J., Gutierrez, C., Santoyo, M., Bandy,
W., Guzman, M., Kostoglodov, V., Reyes, G., Ramırez, C.,
1997. The October 9, 1995 Colima–Jalisco, Mexico earthquake
(Mw8): an aftershock study a comparison of this earthquake
with those of 1932. Geophysical Research Letters 24 (17),
2223–2227.
Pardo, M., Suarez, G., 1993. Steep subduction geometry of the
Rivera Plate beneath the Jalisco Block in western Mexico. Geo-
physical Research Letters 20 (21), 2391–2394.
Perg, L.A., Anderson, R.S., Finkel, R.C., 2001. Use of a new 10Be
and 26Al inventory method to date marine terraces, Santa Cruz,
California, USA. Geology 29 (10), 879–882.
Pirazzoli, P.A., 1996. Sea-Level Changes: The Last 20,000 years.
Wiley, England. 211 pp.
Plafker, G., 1969. Tectonics of the March 27, 1964, Alaska earth-
quake. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper (543-I),
1–74.
Plafker, G., Rubin, M., 1967. Vertical tectonic displacements in
south-central Alaska during and prior to the great 1964 earth-
quake. Journal of Geosciences 10 (19), 53–66. Osaka City
University.
Ramırez-Herrera, M.T., Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J., 1999. Morphotec-
tonic zones along the coast of the Pacific continental margin,
southern Mexico. Geomorphology 28, 237–250.
Ramırez-Herrera, M.T, Ortiz, M., Zamorano, J.J., Urrutia-Fucugau-
chi, J., 1998a. Morphological evidence of Quaternary tectonic
uplift along the Pacific coast, Jalisco, southwest Mexico. Amer-
ican Quaternary Association, Program and Abstracts of the 15th
Biennial Meeting, 5–7 September 1998. AMQUA, Puerto Val-
larta, Mexico, p. 145.
Ramırez-Herrera, M.T., Zamorano, J.J., Ortiz, M., Urrutia-Fucugau-
chi, J., Reyna, R., Gutierrez, R., Leon, E., Marshall, J., 1998b.
Quaternary tectonic uplift along the Pacific coast of Jalisco,
southwest Mexico. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical
Union, 1998 Fall Meeting, November 10, 1998. American Geo-
physical Union, Washington D.C., USA 79 (45), F875.
Ramırez-Herrera, M.T., Kostoglodov, V., Summerfield, M., Urrutia-
Fucugauchi, J., Zamorano, J.J., 1999. A reconnaissance study of
the morphotectonics of the Mexican Subduction zone. Annals of
Geomorphology 118, 207–226.
Rust, D., Kershaw, S., 2000. Holocene tectonic uplift in northeast-
ern Sicily; evidence from marine notches in coastal outcrops.
Marine Geology 167 (1–2), 105–126.
Singh, S.K., Astiz, L., Havskov, J.H., 1981. Seismic gaps and re-
currence periods of large earthquakes in the Mexican subduction
zone: are-examination. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of
America 71, 827–843.
Singh, S.K., Ponce, L., Nishenko, S.P., 1985. The great Jalisco,
Mexico, earthquakes of 1932: subduction of the Rivera Plate.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 75 (5),
1301–1313.