Upload
maxblau
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
1/44
STATE OF GEORGIAJUDICIAL COMPLEX
GEORGIA STATE FINANCING & INVESTMENT COMMISSION
GEORGIA BUILDING AUTHORITYBR
July 23, 2014
Request for Proposal
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
2/44
hok.com | Page 2
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
3/44
Page 3 | hok.com
O U R C O M M I T M E N T
July 23, 2014
Mr. Jeff LacksGeorgia State Financing and
Investment CommissionProcurement Services Department
270 Washington Street, SWSecond Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30334
RE: Letter of Transmittal
RFP No. GBA-182-DPRequest for Proposal
State of GeorgiaJudicial Complex
Dear Mr. Hyde,
HOK is pleased to submit our proposal for RFQ GBA-182-DP Design Professional services for the State of GeorgiaJudicial Complex. On behalf of HOK, I am proud to offer an extraordinary team of experienced planning, design andengineering professionals for this very important project. This is a unique project in that there are not many StateJudicial Complex projects implemented. This team that has experience with the operations and functions of this typeof state court facility which is essential for achieving a proper facility design for the operations of the highest court inthe state.
The results of our design effort will provide the State of Georgia and particularly the judicial system with a highlyinviting, but also highly secure and environmentally sustainable work environment for the public and staff. Our
specialized knowledge of planning and designing major court facilities makes HOK uniquely qualified.
The HOK Team meets all of the key criteria as well as provides world-class companies and committed professionalsfrom each we have carefully selected. The firms and professionals were handpicked based on their specificexperience, qualifications necessary to achieve and exceed expectations and requirements of this unique project.We have successfully worked together in the past and have the complete staffing, technical resources and localknowledge to execute this project efficiently and effectively.
HOK has the architectural design expertise in house and will hold the sole responsibility for the design and engineeringteam coordination. This will be a streamlined team that can effectively manage the design services of the project and
ensure your objectives are successfully achieved. Speaking for the HOK team and as Principal-in-Charge/SeniorProject Manager, we look forward to the opportunity to meet with you, share ideas and discuss your project in moredetail on July 31.
Sincerely,
Michael Katzin, AIA
Vice President | Principal-in-Charge
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
4/44
hok.com | Page 4
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
5/44
Page 5 | hok.com
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
WE FOCUS ON PROVIDING INNOVATION AND DESIGN EXCELLENCE
IN COURT DESIGN THAT CONFRONTS THE DEMANDS OF OUR TIME,
LOOKS INTO OUR COMMON FUTURE AND PREPARES FOR TOMORROW.
D. QUALIFICATIONS AND EX PERI ENCEO F P R O P O S E D D E S I G N T E A M
E. D E S I G N P L A N
APPENDIX
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
6/44
hok.com | Page 6
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
7/44
Page 7 | hok.com
D. Q U A L I FI C A T I O N SA N D E X P E R I E N C E O FP R O P O S E D D E S I G N
T E A MD1 P R O P O S E D D E S I G N T E A M
The HOK team has been specifically assembled for the Stateof Georgia Judicial Complex project with the best interestof GSFIC and the Georgia Building Authority in mind. Thisproposed HOK team has recent and relevant experience onsimilar projects, which are highlighted in this proposal andinclude the Thomas F. Eagleton US District Courthouse, theScott M. Matheson Courthouse, and Douglas County JusticeCenter. Furthermore, the HOK Design and Consultant Teamhas a significant history of successful working experiencewith GSFIC . Shown in the adjacent organizational chart arethe key individuals and firms on our proposed team.
Jordan & Skala Engineers
MEP Engineering
HOK
Structural Engineering
Eberly & Associates
Civil Engineering
Faithful and Gould
Cost Estimating
Dorma
Hardware
Waveguide
Data, Acoustics, A/V, Court
Technology
Gabler Youngston
Lighting
JA Engineering
Security
KEY DESIGN TEAM MEMBERS
KEY ENGINEERING & CONSULTANT TEAM
Michael Katzin, AIAPrincipal - in -Charge
Senior Project Manager
PROJECT LEADERSHIP
Dan Wiley
Court Operations &Planning Specialist
Marc Johnson
AIA, NCARB, LEEDAP BD+CProject ArchitectBIM Coordinator
Julia Busby,ASID, LEEDAPInterior Designer
Todd Bertsch,AIA, LEEDAP
Project Designer
Jeff Goodale, ACAQAQC
Robert Schwartz,
NCARB, FAIA,LEEDAP BD+CSenior Courts Architect
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
8/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
9/44
Page 9 | hok.com
Julia Busby, Associate ASID, NCIDQ, LEED AP,Interior Designer
Julia will oversee and support the team by providing interiordesign services throughout the project. Julia is particularlyadept at programming, space planning, the development ofcolor palettes, the selection and specification of materials
and finishes, as well as the development of furnishingspecifications and bid documents.
Matt Breidenthal, SE, PE, LEED AP,Lead Structural Engineer
Matt is a structural engineer and HOKs East Coast RegionalLeader for Engineering, responsible for delivering award-winning, complex and demanding multi-disciplinary projects.Matt brings a deep appreciation for interdisciplinary
collaboration and is recognized for his ability to bringinnovative and creative solutions to the table.
Don Sheffield, PE, LEED AP,Senior Mechanical Engineer
A firm Principal, registered mechanical engineer, Don is theDirector of Mechanical Engineering for Jordan & Skala.With over 30 years of experience designing and managingcomplex mechanical projects for the industrial, judicial,corporate, hospitality, healthcare, laboratory, retail andresidential markets.
Tim Milam, PE, Electrical Engineer
Tim has over 25 years of experience managing complexelectrical engineering projects. Tim has an extensive designbackground creating power, lighting, fire alarm and relatedsystems for markets ranging from manufacturing andindustrial complexes to corporate, municipal, hospitality and
multi-family facilities.
Gregory Delaney, PE, LEED AP, Lead Civil Engineer
Mr. Delaney is the Senior Civil Engineering ProjectManager at Eberly & Associates and has corporatemanagement responsibilities in technical quality assuranceand quality control. Mr. Delaney serves as the Principal inCharge and Project Manager for the firms municipal andCounty government projects.
Mike Pritchett,CCE, CEP, FAACE, Chief Cost Estimator
As technical director and chief estimator forFaithful+Goulds Atlanta, GA office, Michael Pritchettis responsible for mobilizing the team and deliveringestimates to ensure quality performance and clientsatisfaction. He manages resources and liaises with clientsto ensure that high quality, responsive service and well-researched information.
D . Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S A N D E X P E R I E N C E O F
P R O P O S E D D E S IG N T E A M C O N T I N U E D
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
10/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
11/44
Page 11 | hok.com4 LEED Certified * experience prior to joining HOK
S E L E C T E D R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
ROBERT W. SCHWARTZ, F A I A , NC A RB , L E E D A P B D CGroup Vice President | Senior Courts Architect
For the past 30 years Bob has worked exclusively on the programming, planning and design ofjustice facilities. Through careful listening and thorough knowledge of planning, accessibility,security, sustainability and technology concepts and standards, he has developed judicialfacilities which uniquely fulfill his clients unique ideals. Twenty-two of Roberts past projects
have been recognized by the American Institute of Architects for design excellence in theirannual Justice Facilities Review.
ED UCATION
Washington UniversityMaster of Architecture andUrban Design, 1978
University of Illinois-ChicagoBachelor of Architecture, 1975Honors with Highest Distinctionin Design AIA School Medal
PROFESSIONAL
REGISTRATIONS
Architecture: Illinois; NCARB;LEED Accredited Professional
M E M B E R S H I P S
American Institute of ArchitectsAmerican CorrectionalAssociationNational Center for State Courts
T I M E C O M M I T M E N T %
4 Washtenaw County District Court
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Travis County Civil & Family
Courthouse
Austin, Texas
Marion County Criminal Superior
Courthouse
Indianapolis, Indiana
Kane County Traffic Court
St. Charles, Illinois
Buzz Westfall Justice CenterClayton, Missouri
Union County Courthouse
Jonesboro, Illinois
4 East Multnomah County
Courthouse
Gresham, Oregon
Douglas County Court and
Government Center
Robert A. Christensen Justice Center
Phase I and IICastle Rock, Colorado
4 Alfred A. Arraj US CourthouseDenver, Colorado
Adams County Justice CenterBrighton, Colorado
Kent County Courthouse
Grand Rapids, Michigan
Lorain County Justice Center
Elyria, Ohio
Johnson County Courthouse Master
PlanOlathe, Kansas
Buzz Westfall Justice CenterClayton, Missouri
Thomas F. Eagleton US Federal
Courthouse
St. Louis, Missouri
Wake County Justice CenterRaleigh, North Carolina
Kane County Courthouse
Geneva, Illinois
Collin County Courtroom PrototypeMcKinney, Texas
Denver Justice Center Master PlanDenver, Colorado
DuPage County Justice CenterWheaton, Illinois
Gwinnett County Detention Center
Expansion
Lawrenceville, Georgia
McHenry County Government Center
Woodstock, Illinois
Old Post Office Missouri Court of
Appeals RenovationSt. Louis, Missouri
Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouse and
Federal Building Renovation
Cincinnati, Ohio
D2
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
12/44
hok.com | Page 12 4 LEED Certified
Scott M. Matheson CourthouseSalt Lake City, Utah
Douglas County Courthouse
Douglasville, Georgia
US District and Circuit Courthouse
Jacksonville, Florida
Travis County Civil & Family
Courthouse
Austin, Texas
Marion County Criminal Superior
CourthouseIndianapolis, Indiana
Cuyahoga County Judicial Facilities
Assessment
Cleveland, Ohio
Charlotte County Judicial Master
Space Plan
Punta Gorda, Florida
St. Louis Family CourtSt. Louis, Missouri
Loudoun County Courthouse
Expansion Program
Leesburg, Virginia
Wahiawa District Court Technical
Assistance in Programming and
Planning
Wahiawa, Hawaii
Urban Court Master Plan + Regional
Justice Center
Las Vegas, Nevada
Clark County Courts Center
Las Vegas, Nevada
Family Courts Masterplan + Service
Center
Las Vegas, Nevada
Criminal Courthouse ProgramSeminole County, FloridaJudicial Master Plan Updated
Charlotte County, Florida
Courthouse Master Plan and ProgramCity of Jacksonville, Florida
Regional Justice Center Program
Thurston County, Washington
Courthouse Center Renovation
Dade County, Florida
New North Butte County CourthouseOroville, California
New Sacramento Criminal
Courthouse
Sacramento, California
Fresno County Courthouse-
Renovation
Fresno, California
S E L E C T E D R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
DAN WILEYPresident | Court Operations and Planning Specialist
Dan Wiley has been involved with court management and planning for 35 years.Since 1986, he has led court facility planning and court operations analysis projectsthroughout the United States. Dan brings an extensive knowledge base in nationalcourt operations and facility planning trends and is particularly familiar with the
emerging changes in court technology and its impact on staffing, operations andspace.
ED UCATION
Florida Atlantic UniversityBachelor of Arts in Psychology
M E M B E R S H I P S
National Center for State CourtsAmerican Bar AssociationNational Association for CourtsManagement
T I M E C O M M I T M E N T %
D2
* experience prior to joining HOK
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
13/44
Page 13 | hok.com4 LEED Certified
S E L E C T E D R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
JEFF GOODALENational Director of Justice | QAQC
With more than 20 years of experience, Jeff brings his knowledge of masterplanning, programming, and design for Justice projects. Jeff is recognized for hisleadership and commitment to a team approach, where consensus building andmutual responsibility are key elements. His other responsibilities include overall
project leadership, client contact, establishment of architectural concepts, budget
ED UCATION
University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignBachelor of Science, ArchitectureStudies 1986
P R O F E S S I O N A L R E G I S T R AT I O N SJeffrey B. Goodale, The New Breed of
Facility, Correctional News
Today, 7-8/2012
Jeffrey B. Goodale, Dave Menzel, Glen
Hodgson, High-Tech Prisons: Latest
Technologies Drive Cost Savings and Staff
Effi ciencies, Corrections
Today, 7/2005
Jeffrey B. Goodale, Michael Brenchley,
Seven Keys to Cost Cutting Through
Master Planning, American Jails, 1/2005
Jeffrey B. Goodale, New Spaces for
Special Needs Populations, Corrections
Forum, July/ August, 7/2004
T I M E C O M M I T M E N T %
Union County Courthouse
Jonesboro, Illinois
Kane County Traffic Court
St. Charles, Illinois
Milwaukee County Courthouse
Facility and Needs Assessment*
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Ellis County Courthouse, Detention
Facility and Parking Garage*Waxahachie, Texas
Ottawa County Courthouse*Grand Haven, MichiganPolk County Courthouse Annex*
Des Moines, Iowa
Washington County Courthouse
Study*
West Bend, Wisconsin
Peoria County Courthouse Addition*Peoria, Illinois
US Courthouse Remodeling*
Peoria, Illinois
Walworth County Courtroom
Remodel*
Walworth County, Wisconsin
Lake County Courthouse Renovation
and Modernization*
Waukegan, Illinois
Union County CourthouseJonesboro, Illinois
Kane County Traffic CourtSt. Charles, Illinois
Milwaukee County Courthouse
Facility and Needs Assessment*Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Ellis County Courthouse, Detention
Facility and Parking Garage*
Waxahachie, Texas
Ottawa County Courthouse*
Grand Haven, Michigan
Polk County Courthouse Annex*
Des Moines, Iowa
Washington County Courthouse
Study*
West Bend, Wisconsin
Peoria County Courthouse Addition*
Peoria, Illinois
US Courthouse Remodeling*
Peoria, Illinois
Lake County Courthouse Renovation
and Modernization*
Waukegan, Illinois
D2
* experience prior to joining HOK
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
14/44
hok.com | Page 14 4 LEED Certified
S E L E C T E D R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C ES E L E C T E D R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
MARC JOHNSON , AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BDCAssociate | Project Architect
With over 14 years of architectural design andproject management experience, Marc Johnson hasdeveloped a project repertoire for mixed-use, retail,education, healthcare, religious and justice clients.
He is well-versed in every phase of project deliverythrough a variety of procurement scenarios.
TODD BERTSCH, A I A , L E E D A PVice President | Design Architect
As a Design Director with over 20 years of experiencein Atlanta, Todd leads one of HOKs strongest studiosin the design of highly complex projects. His high levelof design, attention to detail and vast knowledge of
complex buildings characterizes his unique designcontributions to the firm.
ED UCATION
Howard UniversityBachelor of
Architecture, 1997
PROFESSIONAL
REGISTRATIONSGeorgia#RA013043
LEED AccreditedProfessionalBuilding Design +Construction
M E M B E R S H I P SAmerican Instituteof Architects (AIA)
NationalOrganization ofMinority Architects(NOMA)
TIMECOMMITMENT
%
ED UCATION
Georgia Institute ofTechnologyBachelor of Sciencein Architecture,1987
PROFESSIONAL
REGISTRATIONS
Architecture:Georgia, 009878
LEED AccreditedProfessional
M E M B E R S H I P SAmerican Instituteof Architects (AIA)
Center forBuilding Science& Performance
Advisory Board
TIMECOMMITMENT
%
4 Douglas County Adult Detention & Law
Enforcement Center
Douglasville, Georgia
Habersham County Justice Facility
Clarkesville, Georgia
4 Porsche Cars North American Headquarters and
Experience Center
Atlanta, Georgia
Center for Civil and Human Rights
Atlanta, Georgia
EquifaxMaster Plan and Campus Renovation
Atlanta, Georgia
Grady Hospital Marcus Trauma Center
Atlanta, Georgia
Georgia Tech University Student Center*Atlanta, Georgia
Habersham County Justice FacilityClarkesville, Georgia
4 Porsche Cars North American Headquarters and
Experience Center
Atlanta, Georgia
Georgia State University
Science Park Phase II
Atlanta, Georgia
4 Georgia Regents University
Medical Education CommonsAugusta, Georgia
Georgia State University
Parker Petit Science Center*
Atlanta, Georgia
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Building #23*
Atlanta, Georgia
D2D2
* experience prior to joining HOK
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
15/44
Page 15 | hok.com4 LEED Certified
S E L E C T E D R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
JULIA BUSBY, ASID, NCIDQ, LEED APSenior Associate | Senior Interior Designer
Julia Busby has 25 years of experience in the interiordesign industry. Julia has managed several interiorsproject teams throughout her career and is experiencedin providing comprehensive interior design services
from pre-design and programming to full designdevelopment.
ED UCATION
University ofGeorgiaBachelor of Fine
Arts
PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS
National Councilfor Interior DesignQualification(NCIDQ) Certified;Georgia
LEED Accredited
Professional
M E M B E R S H I P S
American Society ofInterior Designers(ASID)
TIME
C O M M I T M E N T
%
Douglasville Public Safety and Municipal Court
Building
Douglasville, Georgia
4 Douglas County Adult Detention and Law
Enforcement CenterDouglasville, Georgia
4 Porsche Cars North American Headquarters and
Experience Center
Atlanta, Georgia
Center for Civil and Human Rights
Atlanta, Georgia
AGL Resources Headquarter Renovation
Atlanta, Georgia
EquifaxMaster Plan and Campus RenovationAtlanta, Georgia
Atlanta Financial Center Building and Campus
RenovationAtlanta, Georgia
S E L E C T E D R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
MATT BREIDENTHAL , S E , P E , L E E D A PSeniorAssociate | Lead Structural Engineer
Matt is a structural engineer and HOKs East CoastRegional Leader for Engineering, responsible fordelivering award-winning, complex and demanding multi-disciplinary projects. Matt brings a deep appreciation for
interdisciplinary collaboration and is recognized for hisability to bring innovative and creative solutions to the table.
ED UCATION
Stanford UniversityMaster of Science,StructuralEngineering, 2004
University of
KansasBachelor of Science,ArchitecturalEngineering(StructuralEmphasis), 2001
PROFESSIONAL
REGISTRATIONS
Professional
Engineer: State ofGeorgia
LEED AccreditedProfessional
TIME
C O M M I T M E N T
%
US General Services Administration Federal Building
& Courthouse*
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
4 Art Institute of Chicago Modern Wing*
Chicago, Illinois
4 Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts Public
Spaces Redesign*
New York, New York
Confidential Corporate Headquarters Multi-
Building Development
Eastern United States
4 Phillips 66 New Corporate Campus
Houston, Texas
4 US Department of Energy, Fermilab Illinois
Accelerator Research Center*
Batavia, Illinois
Confidential Corporate Campus Expansion &
RenovationEastern United States
D2D2
* experience prior to joining HOK
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
16/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
17/44
Page 17 | hok.comPage 17 | hok.com
D2
4 LEED Certified
S E L E C T E D R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
GREGORY DEL ANEY, P E , L E E D A PPrincipal-in-Charge | Lead Civil Engineer
Mr. Delaney is the Senior Civil Engineering ProjectManager at Eberly & Associates and has corporatemanagement responsibilities in technical qualityassurance and quality control. Mr. Delaney serves as
the Principal in Charge and Project Manager for thefirms municipal and County government projects.
ED UCATION
Purdue UniversityBachelor of Science,Civil Engineering,1973
PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS
Professional CivilEngineer in thestates of GA, NC,SC, AL, AR, TN, IL,IN, MS, NV, NH, TX,KS, PA and PuertoRico
LEED AccreditedProfessional
TIME
C O M M I T M E N T
%
State Capital Renovations (GBA)
Atlanta, Georgia
254 Washington Street (GBA) Waterproofing
Atlanta, Georgia
Mitchell Street Pedestrian Plan (GBA)Atlanta, Georgia
Cobb County Superior Courthouse
Marietta, Georgia
Rockdale County Government Center
Rockdale County, Georgia
South Fulton Community Justice Center
Fulton County, Georgia
Newton County CourthouseCovington, Georgia
Cherokee County Courthouse
Cherokee County, Georgia
D2
S E L E C T E D R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
MIKE PRITCHET T, C C E , C E P , F A A C ETechnical Director | Chief Estimator
As technical director and chief estimator for Faithful+GouldsAtlanta, GA office, Michael Pritchett is responsible formobilizing the team and delivering estimates to ensurequality performance and client satisfaction. He manages
resources and liaises with clients to ensure that high quality,responsive service and well-researched information.
ED UCATION
Polytechnic InstituteBachelor of Science,1976
CERTIFICATIONS
Association for the
Advancement ofCost Engineering(AACE), CertifiedCost Engineer(CCE), 2000
Association for theAdvancement ofCost Engineering(AACE), CertifiedEstimatingProfessional (CEP),2008
(AACE), PresidentElect, AtlantaChapter, 2012
TIME
C O M M I T M E N T%
Thomas County Courthouse
Thomasville, Georgia
Richmond County Judicial Center
Charlotte, North Carolina
Tuscaloosa Federal Building
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
New Bern Federal Courthouse
New Bern, North Carolina
U.S. Federal CourthouseColumbia, South Carolina
Henry County Courthouse
McDonough, Georgia
U.S. Federal Courthouse
Knoxville, Tennessee
U.S. Court of Appeals, Judge Chambers RenovationNashville, Tennessee
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
18/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
19/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
20/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
21/44
Page 21 | hok.comPage 21 | hok.com
S I Z E
1,037,632 sq. ft.24,000 sq. ft. renovation of existing
TOTAL VALUE OF PROJECT
$184 MillionDATES
1992-2000
C H A N G E O R D E R I N F O R M A T I O N
The contractor violated theircontract with GSA by usingChinese construction materials andquestionable billing practices. They
were fired but because of that anychange order log was stopped and allproject financials confiscated. Whenthe dust settled GSA acted as thecontractor and rehired most of theexisting sub-contractors and a few newones. We assisted GSA in developingremedies to the deficiencies foundand getting the project completed but
do not have a complete project recordof the change orders and projectfinancials.
S C H E D U L E S U M M A R Y
The project was bid in two parts.Phase 1 was for site remediation,construction of a foundation slurry wallto bedrock, excavation and all below
grade construction as well as the 500foot tall building core. Phase 2 wasfor the remainder of the courthouse.The overall schedule was impacted byincreased remediation requirements, aGSA time out and review that stoppedall their design and constructionprojects, ongoing changes in projectscope and the firing of the general
contractor.
CLIENT CON TACT AND
R E F E R E N C E
Linda PhillipsGeneral Services AdministrationDesign & Construction Division816-926-8305
P R O J E C T T E A MGerald Gilmore, Principal Architectno longer with HOK
Gyo Obata, Principal Design Architectretired, no longer with HOK
Robert Schwartz, Court Planner,Designerstill with HOK
Joe Robertson, Project Managerno longer with HOK
Lee LeBoeuf, Project Architectstill with HOK
David Dimitry, Project Architectstill with HOK
Terry Laflen, Project Architectstill with HOK
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
22/44
hok.com | Page 22
SIZE
685,000 sq. ft.
TOTAL VALUE OF PROJECT
$68.2 Million
DATES1994-1998
C H A N G E O R D E R I N F O R M A T I O N
There were no change orders recorded due tothe fact it was a design build project.
S C H E D U L E S U M M A R Y
This project was completed according to the
clients schedule expectations.CLIENT CONTACT AND REFERENCE
State of UtahDivision of Facilities Construction801.538.3263
P R O J E C T T E A MAlan Bright, Project Designerstill with HOK
Lynn Filar, Project Architectstill with HOK
Clifford Ham, Project ManagerNo longer with HOK
Fortunato Zanghi, Project ArchitectNo longer with HOK
Page 22 | hok.com
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
23/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
24/44
hok.com | Page 24
S I Z E
340,000 sq. ft.
TOTAL VALUE OF PROJECT
$102 Million
DATES2008-2009
C H A N G E O R D E R I N F O R M A T I O NFor this $100 million, 500,000 sf, multi-buildingproject there were two Change Orders presentedto the Client for the project. The overall budgetremained within the GMP amount. Change OrderNo. 1 was $340,040. Change Order No. 2 wasfor ($330,178) for return of Owner and remainingconstruction contingencies. The team was pleasedthat designing to GMP in 9 months and only having
two change orders in construction was a success.
S C H E D U L E S U M M A R Y
The project schedule was achieved. This was aFast Track project with a requirement to establishGMP in nine months. Separate early packagesfor sitework and foundations was issued forpermit and construction. A final package for shell,core, and structure was subsequently issued. AWeapons Training Firing Range was added to the
scope and was treated as a separate project. Theproject was completed within the Owners schedulerequirements.
C L I E N T C O N T A C T A N D R E F E R E N C E
Eric LintonCounty AdministratorDouglas County Government
P R O J E C T T E A M
Michael Katzin, PIC, Project Managerstill with HOK
Bob Schwartz, Plannerstill with HOK
Jeff Goodale, Principal Laboratory Plannerstill with HOK
Marc Johnson, Project Architectstill with HOK
Julia Busby, Interior Designerstill with HOK
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
25/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
26/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
27/44
Page 27 | hok.com
E . D E SI G N P L A N
STATE O F R HO D E
I S L A N D S U P R E M E
C O U R TL E I G H T O N J U D I C I A L C O M P L E X
Warwick, Rhode Island
Four times larger than its predecessor, thiscourthouse embraces the challenges ofproviding security, accessibility and flexibility,while best serving the public and the judicialstaff. The complex includes space for 16 courtrooms and offices for the District, Family andSuperior Courts with each division occupyingits own floor. At the ground level are officesfor the Attorney General, Public Defender,probation offices and the Capitol Police. Thecomplex is also separated by a 100-foot-widerestored wetland garden to a new five-levelparking garage. Separate covered walkwaysfor the public and staff create a formal
courtyard to the Judicial Center.
E HOK is an integratedmultidisciplinary design firm thattakes total responsibility andaccountability for project concerns.The HOK team will provide fullprofessional design services including
architecture, interior design, MEPengineering, structural engineering,code consulting and cost estimatingservices. The HOK Atlanta office hasbeen a well-established architecturalpractice in the State of Georgiasince 1994 and has significantproject experience with the GeorgiaState Financing and Investment
Commission (GSFIC).
CA
DY
l
ng
ed
l
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
28/44
hok.com | Page 28
P H I L O S O P H Y O F C O L L A B O R A T I O N & A P P R O A C H T O
C O N F L I C T R E S O L U T I O N
HOK understands what it takes to manage and engagediverse stakeholders in productive discussions aboutcomplex, sometimes controversial, issues. We appreciatethe challenges involved in bringing the client, the design
team and the stakeholders together in a process ofdiscovery, problem solving and action planning.
Following the principles below, we have been able to bringdiverse, often opposing voices, into planning processes inproductive, meaningful ways.
Establish a Clear, Transparent Process
Build Understanding & Ownership
Reach beyond the Usual Players Follow a No Surprises Ethic
We advocate a collaborative charrette based approach thatbrings the client, the design team and the stakeholderstogether in a more integrated, transparent process ofmutual discovery, problem solving and action planning.
We strive to maintain constant communication; in thismanner we are able to identify potential areas of conflictbefore they escalate. The key to effective conflictresolution for this project team will be based on personal
relationships and understanding that if the project isto succeed within the time and budget constraints, thecomplete cooperation of all those involved is imperative.
Due to the scope and nature of HOKs projects, we havefollowed these key principles to minimize and resolve
conflict, and will utilize them on your project:
1. Develop a Roles and Responsibilities Matrix at the onsetof the project including the broader team. This toolfacilitates communication as well as ensures that theright parties are involved and committed.
2. Develop a Communication Tree. This tool ensures thatall parties are informed when necessary and maintained
current. It also identifies the flow of information andeliminates the need for guesswork.
3. Integrate the critical decision process into theproject work plan, via meeting agendas and decisiontimeframes, ensuring stakeholders understand what thefocus is, they are ready and have sufficient engagementto make informed decisions.
4. Set up open and continuous communication withinthe project team: owner, architects, engineers andcontractor.
E . D E S IG N P L A N C O N T I N U E D
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
29/44
Page 29 | hok.com
5. Establish formal/structured partnering sessionsthroughout the course of the project.
6. Foresee issues before they arise and work with a teamto prevent them. When challenges do arise, define theissue as soon as possible. Solve the challenge at the
lowest possible level within the project team.
7. When conflicts do arise that cannot be resolved withoutthird party involvement, agree to non-binding mediation.
Frequent design, scheduling, and coordination meetingscan act as the primary method of conflict resolution. Weanticipate biweekly meetings with GSFIC, the GeorgiaBuilding Authority and the design team to review project
schedule and design.
By using all of the team members expertise to identifypotential problems, issues can be addressed before theyimpact cost or schedule. Open channels of communicationplay a decisive role in completing a project successfully.
P R O P O S E D M E T H O D S O F C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Communication and collaboration are essential ingredientsfor expediting the decision making process.
The most effective and efficient method of communicationis always face-to-face. Our entire design team is ideally
located in Atlanta to maximize direct communication withthe Georgia Judicial Complex and we intend to leveragethis to the full extent.
Our HOK team will be available to attend team meetings,on short notice throughout the design process. We willcoordinate, lead and document all key stakeholder on-campus workshops. We will have formal sign-offs of thedecisions made to ensure that we have consensus and
we are all moving forward in the same direction. Betweenmeetings, we will coordinate and communicate extensivelywith Project Managers and other appropriate points ofcontact. In addition, we have many electronic tools tofacilitate project delivery including: e-mail, ftp sites and aproject specific website. Properly integrated, these toolscontribute to more and efficient and effective delivery ofservices.
E . D E S IG N P L A N C O N T I N U E D
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
30/44
hok.com | Page 30
All HOK projects are subject to a quality assurancephilosophy and receive thorough reviews according to anHOK Quality Assurance Plan developed for each projectusing published HOK QA/QC guidelines. Two keyaspectsof this plans successful application include:
1. Awareness at all levels that quality starts with designersand production staff but is also the responsibility of theentire team, and
2. Face-to-face coordination between disciplines isnecessary to reduce miscommunication and improve theoverall quality of document integration.
HOK has for many years been using electronic based
project management systems. We routinely employelectronic check lists, and web based design andconstruction administration tools to facilitate accurate andquick communication between various team members.HOK has developed its own construction administrationdocument and an issue tracking system that it employsin all its projects. The system gives the contractor,subcontractor, owner, user and design team access to thestatus of punchlists, shop drawing logs, change order logs
as well as responses to contractor Request for Information(RFIs). Our field reports are issued electronically to the
team members within 24 hours of site visits. HOK alsohas the capability to work with owner or contractors webbased project management tools.
HOK has successful and extensive experience managingprojects of various scales and complexities. We understandthe importance of proactive and collaborative projectmanagement, and we know how to manage best the entireteams effort with regard to budget and schedule. We havean excellent track record for delivering projects on time andwithin specified cost limitations.
S C H E D U L E
HOK assumes a leadership role for the pace of criticaldecision-making and for the overall progress of the
projects development. We use computer-based projectmanagement and project scheduling software to establishthe primary critical path as well as the incrementalmilestones and task deadlines necessary to keep thingson course. In weekly Project Management meetings,HOK closely monitors milestone/ task deadlines as keyindicators of the teams ability to meet schedule targetsand takes immediate remedial action, if necessarydecisions, actions or deliverables are not provided by the
responsible team member as required
E . D E S IG N P L A N C O N T I N U E D
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
31/44
Page 31 | hok.com
E . D E S IG N P L A N C O N T I N U E D
C O S T C O N T R O L
HOKs cost modeling methodology is derived from morethan forty years of project management experience, yetit maintains a very direct, uncomplicated structure. Afterestablishing the desired hard cost target, the first stepin the cost control process is to work in conjunction withthe Owner and the Project Managers to break the totaltarget construction cost into a number of components orsystems and to establish an sub-budget objective for eachof these elements, the total of which will equal the intendedconstruction cost. Establishing the elemental cost modelallows for discussions about each component relatedto the performance expectations, desired appearance,intended quality, and a host of other criteria that will guidethe amount of money to be allocated to each component
within the overall budget. HOKs cost control methodologyrequires periodic testing of the construction cost at anumber of critical milestone points by re-checking eachcost category. Informal measurement, in the form of
spot checks related to pricing of component pieces orsystems, takes place as desired throughout the design anddocumentation process. If the variance from the budgetis relatively small, the wayward component can be easilybrought back into line.
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
32/44
hok.com | Page 32
E . D E S IG N P L A N C O N T I N U E D
E U N I Q U E C H A L L E N G E S / R I S K
Re-Confirm Construction BudgetTrend
Many contractors are reporting the forthcomingBraves Ballpark, Falcons Stadium and State Farmheadquarters projects will absorb regional labor andmaterials and will impact prices for other projects thatwill go to bid or be in procurement in the next few years.
Recommendation Expand cost estimating services by including and
implementing a formal, internal Value Analysis in theSchematic and Design Development Phases
Our team has the expertise, tools and experienceto conduct formal Value Analysis and focus cost
management on major building systems
Accuracy in Pre-Construction Pricing by ConstructionManagersTrend
Many owners experiencing non-transparent andnon-competitive pre-construction pricing andconstructability reviews during the schematic anddesign development phases.
This results in schedule impact in achieving a bid orGuaranteed Maximum Price milestone in a timely
manner. This also results in a tension between Owner,Architect and Contractor.
Recommendation Option 1 require the contractor to produce actual
sub quotes
Option 2 - Engage two Construction Managers to doand compete on the Pre-Construction pricing effort
Contractor - Construction Schedule & Project DeliveryMethod ConfirmationTrend
Many owners experiencing bid submittals and aconfirmation to meet schedule
When a contract is signed then the schedule isqualified that separate packages are required
This can result is additional cost for the A/E to modifythe project delivery that results in issuance of multipledocument packages for compiling, coordination,review, approval and procurement
Recommendation Make sure the Construction Invitation to Bid (ITB)
document includes a statement that the ITB scheduleshall be met without requiring separate bid packagesfor site, foundation and structure.
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
33/44
Page 33 | hok.com
Early Courtroom Mock-upTrend
Some clients are not able to fund construction of acourtroom mock-up during the design phases.
This can result is changes during the constructionphase
Recommendation We recommend construction of a courtroom mock-
up in the design phases and make appropriateadjustments to solicit approval of the judicialstakeholders and courtroom bench height, sightlines,lighting and also the millwork and finishes budget.
This can avoid significant change orders if done after
Construction Documents are completed.
Site Engineering & GDOT: I-75 influences and Memorial Drive Department of
Transportation control will necessitate thorough andextensive interaction with GDOT.
The street designs will comply with GDOTrequirements and restrictions.
Meetings will be held early with GDOT to define thedesign parameters.
The resulting design directives will be communicatedto all Team members and incorporated into the design.
Stormwater Management: Storm water management will be required for the
project it is not desirable to have a surface detentionpond.
The neighboring park retention water feature will beexplored for capacity
City of Atlanta Ordinances will prevail and provide aguideline approach that may be used to develop theplan.
This may provide an opportunity for landscapeirrigation water.
E . D E S IG N P L A N C O N T I N U E D
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
34/44
hok.com | Page 34
E . D E S IG N P L A N C O N T I N U E D
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
35/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
36/44
hok.com | Page 36
E . D E S IG N P L A N C O N T I N U E D
The proposed schedule and workplan is based on a CM/GC project delivery method, and illustrates the delivery ofproject construction documents for the Judicial Complexwithin 18 months. We believe it is in the GBA and GSFICsbest interest to begin construction in mid-2016. Thereason for this is related to competitiveness cost whileother major projects are under construction. There willbe three major local projects expecting to complete in orby late 2017. They include the new Braves Ball Field,Falcons Stadium and State Farm Insurance projects.The competitiveness timing will be especially criticalfor structural systems labor and materials. An earlierconstruction start could reduce structural costs. A detailedMicrosoft Projects Schedule is located in the Appendixof our proposal in addition to the graphic schedule on theprevious pages.
Our schedule includes The schedule is shown with no stops between the design
phases and the construction phase. We do howeverunderstand that the commencement of the constructionphase is contingent upon state approval of funds.
Workshops/Meetings are planned on a 3 week intervalover the course of the project to ensure project
milestones and objectives are met.
Weekly management status/look ahead conferences.
Early, cursory State Fire Marshal review to obtain buy-inon the project life safety concepts. This will eliminate anymajor surprises during Construction Documents.
Early, cursory City of Atlanta review to obtain buy-inon the project site development. This will eliminate anymajor surprises during Construction Documents.
A/E Cost Estimates will be reviewed with GSFIC, GBAand other judicial stakeholders at each project milestone.
We assumed a GSFIC Design Review Group (DRG) reviewperiod at the end of each phase. A final presentationto GSFIC, GBA, and other judicial stakeholders to getapproval and notice to proceed at each project milestone.
Detailed project schedule in addition to the scheduleshown on the following pages is attached in appendix ofthis submittal.
Schedule Compliance Systems & ProceduresHOK uses Newforma and Deltek for time management andscheduling. Weekly internal team meetings. Schedule updates in the agenda of Owner/Architect
meetings during the design phases.
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
37/44
Page 37 | hok.com
E . D E S IG N P L A N C O N T I N U E D
Alternate ScheduleHaving analyzed the projects complexity, the importanceof collaboration and regular feedback, and proper ownerreview at each milestone, we believe the best method ofcompressing the schedule, if desired, is to:
Maintain the same structure but shorten the cycle ofworkshops, presentations and reviews.
Modify the project delivery to include Fast Track,separate pricing and permitting packages that couldinclude
+ site development,+ foundations/structure and+ shell/core/interior/building systems packages.
E C O N S T RU C T I O N A D M I NI S T R A T I O NDuring the construction phase, the design team will attendbi-weekly job meetings, make periodic site visits, writeand submit progress reports and observe the progressof the work to determine if the work is proceeding inaccordance with the contract documents. The designteam shall observe the construction of the facilities todetermine whether individual work elements are in generalconformance with the design intent shown on the design
documents. GSFIC and the Georgia Judicial Complex willbe regularly informed of the progress of the work and,when necessary, notified in writing of deficiencies.
The design team shall review shop drawings, catalog cuts,laboratory and mill tests and samples for conformancewith the Construction Documents. When necessary, thedesign team shall interpret and provide recommendationson the requirements of the Construction Documents andinstruct contractors on behalf of GSFIC and the GeorgiaJudicial Complex. The team will prepare supplementaldrawings and change orders as necessary. The designteam shall review the contractors requisitions for payment.Such review shall be provided to indicate for GSFIC andthe Georgia Judicial Complex, which based on the DesignTeams observations, the work has been progressed to theindicated point.
During the Construction Phase the Design Team willreview, on a monthly basis, the contractors constructionschedule to determine the integrity of critical sequencingrelationships and the cumulative effect on the schedule ofall adjustments and changes to work already incorporatedinto the construction contracts. In coordination withthe Georgia Judicial Complex and other consultants,the Design Team shall review the project to determinesubstantial completion and final completion in accordancewith the contract documents.
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
38/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
39/44
Page 39 | hok.com
measures for Justice facilities and assisted in trainingarchitects on proper implementation. This work is availableon the Access Board website and in the NCSC CourthousePlanning Standards. Disabilities including hearing, sightand physical impairments. Our challenge is to provideaccess in a natural yet visibly transparent manner whichsupports the facilitys function without intrusion or
additional cost.
Anti-Terrorism, Security Provisions- HOK utilizes ourknowledge gained from federal courthouses (and otherfacilities such as embassies to the Pentagon) to implementtechnologies appropriate for your project.
Vehicle stand-off distances to reduce risk from carbombs with the use of the invisible integration of site
elements. Raise air intakes to prevent the introduction of chemical
and biological contaminants. Aim exterior windows away from sensitive areas;
particularly areas where explosions could occur. Provide structural redundancy to assure the continued
use of the facility after a natural or terrorist event. Locate utilities in secure areas away from docks and
building entries that could be compromised.
Other additional services GSFIC and the Georgia BuildingAuthority might consider include:
Full Time On-Site Architect FF&E - Selection, Spec & Procurement Support Irrigation - Design & Spec GA Peach Enhanced Commissioning Agent (incentive -
10 points) A/V Equipment Design & Specifications Aerial Construction Phase Photography High Definition/Resolution Renderings High Definition/Resolution Rendered Animated Fly-thrus Completed Building Photography Permitting Fees Physical Security - Force Protection Design & Spec Physical Security - Progressive Collapse Protection
Structural
Building Systems Equipment Training Building Systems Equipment Programming Site Surveying Geotechnical Investigation Materials Testing & Inspection - Construction Phase Water Flow & Static Pressure Testing Jurisdictional Waters Delineation IBC Section 1704 Special testing - Construction Phase Existing Site or Building Field Dimension Documentation Zoning Change Assistance
Off-Site Utility Improvements - Design & Engineering Road/Intersection Improvements - Design & Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Services
E . D E S IG N P L A N C O N T I N U E D
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
40/44
hok.com | Page 40
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
41/44
Page 41 | hok.com
A P P E N D I X
We have included a detailed Microsoft
Projects Schedule in an Appendix and in
addition to the schedule shown in Section E3.
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
42/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
43/44
7/23/2019 HOK - State judicial complex - proposal
44/44
Michael Katzin, AIAPrincipal-in-Charge
HOK191 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2250 | Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
+1 678 954 8976
www.hok.com