HM PP Slides Ch13

  • Upload
    xzsya

  • View
    228

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    1/30

    Chapter 13

    Leadership in Schools

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    2/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Leadership Defined

    Bennis (1989): like beauty, (or pornography), leadership ishard to define, but you know it when you see it

    Chemers (1997:1): a process of social influence in which

    one person is able to enlist the aid and support of others in

    the accomplishment of a common task Most definitions agree that leadership involves a social

    influence process; beyond that, scholars dispute the meaning

    of leadership.

    We define leadership broadly as a social process in which anindividual or a group influences behavior toward a shared

    goal.

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    3/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Life as a School Administrator

    Structured observation studies reveal similarcharacteristics of administrative jobs across countriesand organizational settings: School administrators work long hours at a physically

    exhausting pace

    School leaders rely on verbal media, and spend much timewalking through the building and talking to individuals andgroups

    Administration requires the ability to change gears andtasks frequently

    Span of concentration for school administrators is shortthe job is fragmented and discontinuity is prevalent

    How does this leave room for leadership? Look totheoretical approaches of leadership for answers.

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    4/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Trait Approach to Leadership

    Trait approach to leadership: Key leadership traits are

    inherited.

    Aristotle thought individuals were born with the qualities that

    would make them good leaders

    Bass (1990) chronicles historical approaches to leadership

    qualities in the US. and underscores Stogdillsmajor review of

    the leadership research.

    Stogdillsmeta-analysis casts dim view on pure trait research:

    impact of traits varies widely from situation to situation, so aperson does not become a leader based on the possession oftraits alone

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    5/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Personality

    There are some traits and skills associated with effective leadership, whichcan be broken into three groups: Personality, Motivation, and Skills

    Personality:relatively stable dispositions to behave in aparticular way--four are of particular note:

    Self-confident leaders: more likely to set high goals and persist

    Stress-tolerant leaders: make good decisions, stay calm, provide decisivedirections under stress

    Emotionally mature leaders: have accurate awareness of strengths andweaknesses, are oriented toward self-improvement

    Leaders with integrity: behaviors are consistent with stated valuestheseleaders are seen as honest, ethical, responsible, and trustworthy

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    6/30

    Motivational Traits

    Motivation: set of energetic forces from both within and beyond an

    individual to initiate work-related behavior and determine its form,

    direction, intensity, and duration

    Four motivational traits are key for effective leaders:

    Task and interpersonal needs: effective leaders have drive for the task andconcern for people

    Power needs: effective leaders seek positions of authority and are comfortable

    exercising influence over others

    Achievement orientation: effective leaders have a desire to excel, a drive to

    succeed, willingness to assume responsibility

    High expectations for success: effective leaders believe they can do the job

    and will receive valued outcomes for their efforts

    Physical traits, such as energy and activity, allow individuals to show their

    competence through active engagement

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    7/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Skills

    Yukl (2002) and Northouse (2004) note three important

    categories of skills for effective leadership

    Technical Skills: specialized knowledge about a specific

    type of work, activity, procedure, or technique

    Interpersonal Skills: understanding of feelings and

    attitudes of others, knowing how to work with people in

    individual and cooperative work relationships

    Conceptual Skills: ability to conceptualize, think logically,

    reason analytically, deductively and inductively

    Effective leaders need all three sets of skills.

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    8/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Situational Approach to Leadership

    Response to trait approach: Researchers tried to identify settingcharacteristics that influenced leader success

    Possible situational determinants of leadership:

    Structural properties of organizationsize, hierarchy, formalization,technology

    Role characteristicstype and difficulty of task, rules, content, performanceexpectations, power

    Subordinate characteristicseducation, age, knowledge, experience,tolerance for ambiguity, responsibility, power

    Internal environmentclimate, culture, openness, participation levels, groupatmosphere, values, norms

    External environmentcomplexity, stability, uncertainty, resourcedependency, institutionalization

    It is clear that both the situation and traits are important in effectiveleadership; it is not one or the other. Both are needed.

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    9/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Leader Behavior

    Early conceptualizations of leadership relied on twocategories of leader behavior: Emphasis on people, interpersonal relations, groups

    Emphasis on production, task completion, and goals

    Ohio State leadership studies LBDQ (leader behavior description questionnaire) studies

    at OSU in 1940s measure two dimensions of leaderbehavior

    Initiating structure: delineates relationship between leader and

    subordinates, establishes defined patterns of organization,procedures, channels of communication. Consideration: indicates friendship, trust, warmth, interest, and

    respect in the relationship between the leader and members ofthe work group

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    10/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Major findings of OSU studies

    Four major findings of LBDQ studies (Halpin, 1966)

    Initiating structure and consideration are fundamentaldimensions of leader behavior

    Effective leaders exhibit frequent behaviors on both dimensions

    Superiors and subordinates attribute success to behaviors inopposite dimensions: superiors tend to credit initiating structurebehaviors; subordinates tend to credit consideration behaviors

    Weak relationship between leadersexpressed beliefs on howthey shouldbehave, and subordinatesdescriptions of howleaders dobehave; Knowing how to behave and behaving thatway are two different events.

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    11/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Recent Perspectives on Leader Behavior

    Same style of leader behavior is not optimal across all

    situations: The appropriate style depends on the situation.

    Yukl (2002) proposes three basic dimension to leadership:

    Task-oriented behaviors: clarifying roles, planning andorganizing operations, monitoring organizational functions

    Relations-oriented behaviors: supporting, developing,recognizing, consulting, and managing conflict

    Change-oriented behaviors: scanning and interpretingexternal events, articulating an attractive vision, proposinginnovative programs, appealing for change, creating a

    coalition to support and implement changes

    Leaders typically engage in all three types of behavior

    The particular situation plays an important role in determiningbest mix.

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    12/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Leadership Effectiveness

    Both objective and subjective dimensions areused to assess leadership effectiveness

    Accomplishment of organizational goals ,e.g.

    student achievement (objective) Self-assessments(subjective)

    Reputation (subjective)

    Perceptual evaluations by significant reference

    groups (subjective)

    Overall job satisfaction of subordinates(subjective)

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    13/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Contingency Models of Leadership

    Contingency theory postulates that effectiveness of the leader

    is contingent upon the appropriate match of the leadership

    traits and skills with the situation.

    Some examples of Contingency Models:

    Instructional Leadership

    Fielders Contingency Model of Leadership

    Substitutes for Leadership

    Distributed Leadership

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    14/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    15/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Instructional Leadership: Alig & Hoy

    The effectiveness of the principals instructional leadership is

    contingent upon a climate of academic emphasis.

    Instructional Leadership Model postulates that effective

    instructional leaders perform three functions:

    Define and communicate goals Monitor and provide constructive feedback on teaching Promote and emphasize professional development.

    However, such leadership will not lead to high student

    achievement (effectiveness) unless there is also a climate,which emphasizes academic success.

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    16/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    17/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Fiedlers Contingency Theory

    Fiedler (1967): First major theory to propose specificcontingency relationships

    Situational control: power and influence leaders have toimplement plans, decisions, and strategies is the situationalvariable

    Determined by three factors:

    Position power

    Task structure

    Leader-member relations Effectiveness:extent to which group accomplishes primary

    goal

    Leadership Style: Task-oriented or Relations-oriented

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    18/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Fiedlers Three Propositions

    1. In high-control situations, task-oriented leaders are more effective than

    relationship-oriented leaders

    2. In moderate-control situations, relationship-oriented leaders are more

    effective than task-oriented leaders

    3. In low-control situations, task-oriented leaders are more effective thanrelationship-oriented leaders

    Model tested rigorously, with mixed, but mainly supportive results

    Criticisms:

    LPC has been a moving target: first measured emotional reaction to difficultsubordinates, then relationship orientation, then the leaders motivational

    hierarchy

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    19/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Substitutes for Leadership Model Kerr and Jermier (1977) question basic assumption that formal leadership

    is necessary; their model is their alternative Substitutes: situational elements that replace or reduce a leaders

    ability to influence attitudes, perceptions, or behaviors of followers

    Neutralizers: situational factors that prevent leader from acting in aparticular way or that nullify effect of leaders actions

    Three categories of situational variables have these influences: Characteristics of subordinates: abilities, training, experience, and

    knowledge, professional orientation, and indifference toward rewards

    Task characteristics: structured routine tasks, intrinsically satisfyingtasks, and feedback

    Organizational characteristics: formalization of roles and procedures,flexibility of rules and policies, work group cohesiveness, spatialdistance between administrator and followers

    Leadership behavior and effective performance is moderated bysubordinate, task, and organizational characteristics.

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    20/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Distributed leadership Distributed leadership models challenge the assumption that

    one person has to be in charge to make change happen; inthis model leadership is an organizational quality.

    Distributed leadership embraces leadership by teams andgroups.

    Spillane et al (2001, 2003):Define leadership around the

    technical core-- the identification, acquisition, allocation,coordination, and use of social, material, cultural resourcesnecessary to establish the conditions forteaching and

    learning

    The distribution and quality of leadership varyacross a variety of situational factors; henceeffective distributed leadership depends uponmatching leadership teams with the appropriate

    situation.

    T f ti l L d hi

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    21/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Transformational Leadership

    Pioneers: Burns (1978), Bass (1985): Three main types of leadership

    Laissez-Faire leadership: absence of transactions with followers. These

    leaders avoid expressing views or taking action, avoid or delay decisions,ignore responsibility, provide little feedback. Most passive, least effectiveof three types.

    Transactional leadership: motivate followers by exchanging rewards forservices. Leaders identify what followers want and try to provide it as

    reward for effort. Respond to followers

    immediate self-interest.Exchanges are economic: pursued on basis of cost-benefit.

    Contingent reward leadership: leader behaviors focus on role and taskrequirements; provide rewards contingent on performance.

    Active management-by-exception: leaders maintain high levels ofvigilance to ensure standards are met; take corrective action quickly.

    Passive management-by-exception: leaders fail to intervene untilproblems are serious.

    Transformational leadership: leadership is expanded to go beyond simpleexchanges and agreement.

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    22/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Transformational Leadership

    Transformational leadership posits four main

    dimensions (the 4 Is):

    Idealized Influence

    Inspirational motivation

    Intellectual motivation

    Individualized consideration

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    23/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Idealized Influence

    Idealized influence: builds trust, respect in followers, thus

    forming basis for acceptance of big changes.

    Leaders display conviction and high standards of conduct,

    share risks, consider needs of others first, and never use

    power for personal gain. Followers admire and trust leader

    and thus buy into mission, even if it requires radical changes

    in the organization.

    Attributed idealized influence: followersperceiveleader as

    being charismatic, confident, powerful, and focused onhigher-order ideals.

    Idealized influence as behavior: charismatic actionsof leaders

    that focus on values, beliefs, and sense of mission

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    24/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Inspirational Motivation

    Inspirational motivation: changes expectations ofgroup members: problems CAN be solved

    Develops appealing vision to guide development oforganizational goals and operating procedures

    Leader behaviors provide meaning, challenge forfollowers

    Project attractive and optimistic future

    Emphasize ambitious goals

    Create idealized visions for organizations Clearly communicate that vision is obtainable

    Results: team spirit, enthusiasm, optimism, goalcommitment, shared vision within the work group

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    25/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Intellectual Stimulation

    Intellectual stimulation: encourage followerscreativityquestion old assumptions, traditionsand beliefs, reframe problems

    Encourage followers to design new procedures andprograms and solve problems

    Encourage unlearningeliminate fixation on wayweve always done it

    Insist on constant open examination of procedures,receptivity to change

    Nothing is sacred: any procedure, policy, or operationcan be contested on the merits

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    26/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Individualized Consideration

    Individualized consideration: leaders pay particular attentionto each individuals needs for growth and achievement

    Leaders act as mentorshelp followers and colleagues develop

    potential and take responsibility for own development

    Create new learning opportunities in supportive climate

    Recognize and accept individual differences in needs and values

    Use two-way communication, and interact personally with

    others

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    27/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Research findings Research on transformational leadership clarifies three

    generalizations: Idealized influence and inspirational leadership most satisfying and effective (Avolio,

    1999; Bass, 1990)

    Transformational leaders receive higher ratings, are perceived to lead more effectiveorganizations, and have subordinates that exert greater effort than transactional leaders(Yukl, 1998; Bass, 1998)

    Transformational leadership in schools directly influences teacher perceptions of studentgoal achievement and student grades (Leithwood, 1994)

    Influences three psychological characteristics of staff:perception of school characteristics, commitment to change,and organizational learning

    Depends upon attending to all four Is, with individualizedconsideration as a base

    Support for Leithwoods claims from other studies: Silins(1992), Marks & Printy (2003)

    d h

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    28/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Servant LeadershipServant leadershipis behavior that nurtures individual

    development in the organization through listening, empathy,

    stewardship, and an awareness to develop followers who thinkethically and foster sound interpersonal relations with theircolleagues.

    The servant leader attends to individual growth, to realizingthe organizations goals, and to the ethical and moral effects onthe broader community

    Servant leadership inverts the power pyramid to show therelative placement of leaders: The leader supports theorganization and the responsibility for action is dispersed

    across the organization. Servant leadership stands on seven pillars: personal

    character, people first, skilled communication, compassionatecollaboration, foresight, systems thinking, and moral authority

    Evolutionary Leadership Theory (ELT)

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    29/30

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011

    Evolutionary Leadership Theory (ELT) The basic premise ELT is that leadership and followership emerged during the

    course of human evolution.

    Leadership and followership are psychological adaptations that have been sculptedinto our brain; they are instinctive and universal and have become the naturalorder of things. We are programmed to live in groups, to be led, and to be obedientmost of the time.

    ELT also postulates the particular traits associated with initiative taking andintelligence are largely inherited and propel people to power positions.

    Leadership has three important functions: it binds groups; it helps the group learnnew things; and it teaches others how to lead.

    We have evolved to follow authority and we have developed an innate follow themajority rule; in fact, the desire to conform overwhelms the desire to be correct.

    The instincts of reciprocity, fairness, and hierarchy are hard wired into our psyches.

    ELT emphasizes followers as a vital component of leadership. Increasingly leadersneed to learn how to shift their pattern of leadership as they as they interact withfollowers up the ladder of commitment from subordinatesto supportersto loyaliststo apprenticesto disciples.

    Leaders need to be a source of inspiration for disciples, a teacher for apprentices, adefender for loyalists, a figurehead for supporters, and a provider for subordinates.

    Practical Imperati es

  • 8/10/2019 HM PP Slides Ch13

    30/30

    Practical Imperatives Know your leadership style and be flexible: There is no one best style.

    Match your leadership style to the situation: Effectiveness depends on

    the appropriate matching. Mission first, people always: Task achievement and supportive socialrelations are essential for success.

    Strive to be broadly effective: Your reputation, subordinate satisfaction,and goal achievement are all important aspects of effectiveness.

    Be both an instructional and organizational leader: Effective instructional

    leadership depends on a school climate of academic emphasis. Delegate and distribute leadership widely: Expertise drives success.

    Be inspirational, intellectual, idealistic, and tailor you leadership to yoursubordinates: Transformative change requires it.

    Lead by serving: Servant leadership creates moral authority.

    Make informality a virtue: Formal structures often interfere withauthentic action.

    Be just: Favoritism and nepotism erode fairness.

    Avoid the Dark Triad: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and a Psychopathy.

    W. K. Hoy 2003, 2008, 2011