Upload
zelia
View
26
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
HLA Allelic and Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction in ImmPort. Paula Guidry, Ph.D. BISC Team – UT Southwestern. HLA Typing Platforms and Ambiguity. HLA Typing Platforms SSOP – single-stranded oligonucleotide probe SSP – sequence-specific priming SBT – sequence-based typing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
HLA Allelic and Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction in ImmPort
Paula Guidry, Ph.D.BISC Team – UT Southwestern
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
HLA Typing Platforms and Ambiguity
HLA Typing Platforms SSOP – single-stranded oligonucleotide probe SSP – sequence-specific priming SBT – sequence-based typing SSCP – single-stranded conformation polymorphism
Allelic Ambiguity Typing methodology cannot distinguish between a set of
alleles Polymorphisms that distinguish these alleles are not
interrogated by the method Outside of exon 2 (class II) or exons 2 and 3 (class I) Sections of these exons not covered by the probes/primers
Genotypic Ambiguity Inability to determine phase in heterozygous samples
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Ambiguity in HLA Typing Data
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Ambiguity in HLA Typing Data
Allelic Ambiguity Reduction
Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Common and Well-Documented (CWD) HLA Alleles Allele has an estimated frequency of at least 0.001 in any
reference population Accurate frequency estimates require an allele to be observed
3+ times Studies with 1500 unrelated individuals (2n = 3000
chromosomes) can only accurately detect allele frequencies ≥ 0.001
OR Allele has been detected unambiguously in at least three
unrelated individuals but gene frequencies have not been estimated accurately
Rare HLA Alleles Alleles that are not CWD
Ambiguity Reduction Principles
CWD Alleles
Cano et al (2007). Common and Well-Documented HLA Alleles. Human Immunology 68: 392-417.
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Meta-Analysis to Determine Worldwide HLA Allele Frequencies Data sources
13th IHW Anthropology/Human Genetic Diversity component 12th IHW Anthropology component Literature• 8 journals• Every issue from 1990 – 2007• 4 studies from other journals
AlleleFrequencies.net ≥ 20 individuals per population sample 497 population samples from around the world Total of 66,800 individuals
Ambiguity Reduction Principles
Regional CWD
Solberg et al (2008). Balancing Selection and Heterogeneity Across the Classical Human Leukocyte Antigen Loci: A Meta-Analytic Review of 497 Population Studies. Human Immunology 69: 443-464.
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Reg-CWD HLA Alleles Allele is common and well-documented in a particular world
region*
Ambiguity Reduction Principles
Regional CWD
* Ignoring the past 1000 years of human migration
OTH – significantly admixed populations
Reg-Rare HLA Alleles Not reg-CWD Not detected in other
world regions
Neither Reg-CWD nor Reg-Rare Not reg-CWD Detected in other world
regions
HLA Allelic Ambiguity Reduction Heuristic
Steve Mack, Glenys Thomson,Rich Single
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Allelic Ambiguity Reduction
Allelic Ambiguity Reduction
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Allelic Ambiguity Reduction
Phase 1
Eliminate others
Eliminate others
Are any of the alleles reg-CWD?
Are any of the alleles reg-CWD?
Elimination of less-probable alleles by CWD status
yes
no
Eliminate others
Eliminate others
Are any of the alleles
CWD?
Are any of the alleles
CWD?
yes
no
Eliminate others
Eliminate others
Are any of the alleles reg-Rare?
Are any of the alleles reg-Rare?
yes
Possible results: single allele call or multiple allele possibilities
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Allelic Ambiguity Reduction
Phase 2
Combine to G-code
Combine to G-code
Do any alleles belong to a common G-
code?
Do any alleles belong to a common G-
code?
yes
no
Combine to P-code
Combine to P-code
Do any alleles or G-codes belong to a common P-
code?
Do any alleles or G-codes belong to a common P-
code?
yes
Eliminate rare alleles
Eliminate rare alleles
Do the alleles contain any
G- or P-codes?
Do the alleles contain any
G- or P-codes?
yes
Possible results: single G- or P- call, multiple G- or P- calls or multiple alleles not related by G- or P- code
Reduction of multiple alleles to G- or P-codes
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Allelic Ambiguity Reduction
Phase 3
User determines most likely
allele
User determines most likely
allele
Are the alleles part of the same allele
family?
Are the alleles part of the same allele
family?
no
yes
Eliminate the lower frequency
alleles
Eliminate the lower frequency
alleles
Is the ratio of MRWAFs* for any pair of
these alleles > 9.49999?
Is the ratio of MRWAFs* for any pair of
these alleles > 9.49999?
yes
Keep the allele/code with the lowest 2nd field (third
and fourth digits)
Keep the allele/code with the lowest 2nd field (third
and fourth digits)
Reduction of alleles in the same family by frequency
no
Are there still multiple
alleles in the set?
Are there still multiple
alleles in the set?
yes
*MRWAF is the mean regional weighted allele frequency: mean frequency for an allele in a given region, weighted by sample sizes
(2n)
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Outcome of HLA Allelic Ambiguity Reduction
HLA Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction
Heuristic
Steve Mack, Glenys Thomson,Rich Single
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction
Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction
Phase 1
Reduction of sub-genotypes by CWD status
Eliminate others
Eliminate others
Are any sub-genotypes
reg-CWD/reg-CWD?
Are any sub-genotypes
reg-CWD/reg-CWD?
yes
no
Eliminate others
Eliminate others
Are any sub-genotypes
reg-CWD/CWD or
CWD/CWD?
Are any sub-genotypes
reg-CWD/CWD or
CWD/CWD?
yes
no
Eliminate others
Eliminate others
Are any G/G, P/P, G/P,
G/reg-CWD, G/CWD, P/reg-CWD, P/CWD?
Are any G/G, P/P, G/P,
G/reg-CWD, G/CWD, P/reg-CWD, P/CWD?
yes
no
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction
Phase 1, continued
Reduction of sub-genotypes by CWD status
Eliminate others
Eliminate others
Are any reg-CWD/reg-
Rare, CWD/reg-
Rare, G/reg-Rare or P/reg-
Rare?
Are any reg-CWD/reg-
Rare, CWD/reg-
Rare, G/reg-Rare or P/reg-
Rare?
yes
no
Eliminate others
Eliminate others
Are any sub-genotypes
reg-Rare/reg-Rare?
Are any sub-genotypes
reg-Rare/reg-Rare?
yes
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction
Phase 2
Reduction of sub-genotypes by zygosity and allele numbers
Keep homozygous sub-genotypes
and sub-genotypes
containing these alleles
Keep homozygous sub-genotypes
and sub-genotypes
containing these alleles
Are any of the sub-
genotypes homozygou
s?
Are any of the sub-
genotypes homozygou
s?
yes
noKeep the sub-
genotype with the lowest sum of the 2nd field (third and
fourth digits)
Keep the sub-genotype with the lowest sum of the 2nd field (third and
fourth digits)
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Outcome of HLA Allelic and Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction
Allelic Ambiguity Reduction
Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction
ImmPortHLA Ambiguity Reduction Tool
www.ImmPort.org
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Example HLA Typing Results File Ready for Ambiguity Reduction in ImmPort
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Ambiguity Reduction Input File
Allelic Ambiguity Reduction Output Genotypic Ambiguity Reduction Output
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Acknowledgements
Steven J. Mack , Ph.D.(CHORI)
Nishanth MarthandanThomas Smith, Ph.D.Patrick Dunn, Ph.D.John CampbellJeff Wiser
Richard Scheuermann, Ph.D.
David Karp, M.D., Ph.D.
Glenys Thomson, Ph.D. (Berkeley)
Richard Single, Ph.D. (UVM)
www.ImmPort.org
HLA Region Genomics Consortium 2010
Allelic Ambiguity Reduction
MRWAF Analysis
MRWAF is the mean regional weighted allele frequency:
mean frequency for an allele in a given region, weighted by sample sizes (2n)
If all alleles have MRWAF = 0 or all pairs have MRWAF ratio ≤ 9.49999, then these are passed to the next step