41
Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Histone Modifications

Seminar in BioinformaticsSaar Gershuni

2005

Page 2: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Background – DNA Packing

• The DNA is packed in various levels of condensation in the nucleous (*10,000)

• Form of condensation – biological role

• Chromosomes, Euchromatin, heterochromatin, DNA strand

Page 3: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005
Page 4: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

The Beads on a String

• The Histones form the 11nm strand.• Are octamer build H3,H4,2HA,2HB monomers• 146-147 bp are wrapped around every histone core• The histone tail sequences account for 28% of the

total amino acid content of the core histones “chromatin fiber

folding: requirement for the Histone H4 n-terminal tail “, Benedetta Dorigo†, Thomas Schalch†, Kerstin Bystricky†, ‡ and timothy J. Richmond , journal of molecular biology 327, 1 , 14 march 2003

• Tail of histone h4 taken from cow

Page 5: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

The Histone Core Wrapped With DNA

Page 6: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Chemical Review

• Acetyl

• Methyl

• Phosphoryl

• Ubiquitin

Page 7: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Histone Modifications• De/Acetylation• Methylation• Phosphorylation• Ubiquitination• ADP-Rybosilation• Swi/Snf complex, which, in vitro, uses the

energy of ATP hydrolysis to disrupt histone-DNA interactions

Page 8: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Histone Modifications Map

Page 9: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Histone Modifications - Role

• Transcription – Acetylation/Methylation

• DNA repair – H2A -Phosphorilation

• Mitosis – chromosomal arrengement

• Chromatin assembly – DNA replication

Page 10: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005
Page 11: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Yi Zhang et al. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 2343-2360

Figure 1. Sites of post-translational modificationson the histone tails

Page 12: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Examples of Biological Role of Histone Modifications

Acetylation –Lisine

• Transcription – loosening the strand

• Replication – the positioning of histones

• Gcn5 – h3k14

Page 13: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Acetylation mechanism

Page 14: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Examples of Biological Role of Histone Modifications

Phosphorylation – serine, threonine (scienceweek)

• Chromosomal condensation – H1,H3

• Rsk-2, an H3 kinase, Coffin Lowry syndrome

• Transcription regulation - drosophila sex chromosomes serine 10 H3 in concert with H4K16

Page 15: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Coffin Lowry SyndromeCoffin-Lowry syndrome is a rare genetic disorder characterized by mental retardation; abnormalities of the head and facial area; large, soft hands with short, thin (tapered) fingers; short stature; and/or various skeletal abnormalities. Characteristic facial features may include an underdeveloped upper jawbone, an abnormally prominent brow, downslanting eyelid folds, widely spaced eyes, large ears, and/or unusually thick eyebrows. Skeletal abnormalities may include abnormal front-to-back and side-to-side curvature of the spine and unusual prominence of the breastbone. Coffin-Lowry syndrome is caused by mutations in the RSK2 gene and is inherited as an X-linked dominant genetic trait. Males are usually more severely affected than females.

Page 16: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Examples of Biological Role of Histone ModificationsMethylation – Arginine, Lisine

– Less studied, enzymology – not known– Can be mono-, bi-, tri- methylated– Transcription regulation - CARM1, arginine-

specific, histone h3-selective methyltransferase activity, coactivator, with p160 family

Page 17: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Yi Zhang et al. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 2343-2360

Figure 2. Chemistry of arginine and lysine methylation

Page 18: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Histone Code

• Code - a system of signals or symbols for communication (webster meriam online)

• Requirements from a code:– Consistent– Combinatorial (Kurdistany & Grunstein, 2003)

Page 19: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patternsto Gene Expression

Siavash K. Kurdistani, Saeed Tavazoie,

and Michael Grunstein

Page 20: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Introduction

• The mechanism by which histone de/acetylation affect transcription involve two pathways:– By altering the folding properties of the chromatin fiber

– By providing binding surface for recruitment of other elements

• To date (6/2004) there is no evidence for consistent patterns of de/acetylation from gene to gene or for the combinatorial use of histone modification sites

Page 21: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

The Experiment – Data Collection & Methods

• Chromatin was extracted from YDS2 exponentially growing

• Using chip and DNA microarrays levels of modification was determined

• 11 sites of acetylation were examined – H4k8,12,16

H3k9,14,18,23,27H2ak7,h2bk11,16

Page 22: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

The Experiment - Methods

• Two Microarrays: 6700 IGR, 6200< ORF• 2-4 repetitions• Normalization by the ration of total intensities.• Coefficient of variation < 0.5 between replicate

experiment were counted• End up with 2206 IGR, 2403 ORF• Data were again normalized over the 11 sites per

histone

Page 23: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

ChIP

Page 24: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Results – Raw Data

Page 25: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Results – Correlation With Gene Expression

These results – though significant might be artificially low due to technicalities.

Page 26: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Results - Clustering

Page 27: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Results – coexpression of Clusters

Problem: what is the expression level of randomly selected cluster of genes?The study also checked expression levels at different stress conditions (255) – correlation was found in 6 IGR’s and 13 ORF’s

Page 28: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Results – Clusters Biological Relevance

• Annotations for all the genes in a cluster were taken from MIPS, GO, MDS

• 12/53 IGR’s, 13/68 ORF’s – with significant results

• Motif search using AlignACE algorithm found 102 of 29/53 IGR’s, 110 of 34/68 ORF’s

Page 29: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Does the Modifications Constitute a Code?

• The authors believe that the answer is no because:

• The total number of modifications does not contain more information than the sum of individual modification.

• Problem: it has been shown to be combinatorial – bdf1 in vitro preference for tetra acetylated H4.

Page 30: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Problems

• Cutting the chromatin fiber was done using sonicator bath thus creating various size of fiber – with various number of nucleosome – problem with measuring acetylation levels.

• Microarrays are 1kb in length can contain up to 5 nucleosomes.

Page 31: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Problems

• Normalization – step 1 – average number of 1 through all the genome.Step 2 – normalizing groups of 11 lysines in each and every locus (=0, var=1)

• All the problems relates with k means algorithm, AlignACE, and gene expression data

Page 32: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Genomic Maps and Comparative Analysis of Histone

Modifications in Human and Mouse

Bradley E. Bernstein, Michael Kamal, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh,

Stefan Bekiranov, Dione K. Bailey, Dana J. Huebert, Scott McMahon,

Elinor K. Karlsson, Edward J. Kulbokas III, Thomas R. Gingeras,

Stuart L. Schreiber, and Eric S. Lander

Page 33: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

The Experiment

• Large scale study of histone modifications (methylation, acetylation) patterns in human and mouse cells

• Methods: ChIP, RTPCR – for validating the data, tiling oligonucleotide arrays – 35 bp intervals

• Focus: chromosomes 21,22, (H3K4 di/trimethylation and H3K9,14 acetylation) and cytokine cluster, IL4 Receptor, and Hox clusters (H3K4 dimethylation)

Page 34: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Results – Raw Data

• 90%< correlation between methylated H3K4, and acetylated H3K9,14

• Di/Trimethyl – gene start

Page 35: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Conservation of Modification pettern Between Human and

Mouse

• For this purpose the IL4R methylation analysis were preformed

• 55% conservation in human, 68% conservation in mouse, (*7 than random) with no correlation with sequence conservation

Page 36: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Hox Clusters

• A group of linked regulatory homeobox genes that are involved in patterning the animal body axis during development. Homeobox genes are defined as those that contain an 180-base-pair sequence that encodes a DNA-binding helix–lturn–helix motif (a homeodomain).(Nature)

• The remaining orthologous regions between human and mouse

Page 37: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Methylation Patterns in Hox Clusters

• Completely unique.

• Contain huge methylated regions encompass multiple genes

• Evolutionary conserved (human-mouse)

• Methylation correlates with expression both in ORF’s and IGR’s unlike IL4R

Page 38: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Problems

• The method of creating the lysate is still sonication.

• No relation with genes functionality, cell cycle phase – can change nucleosome concentration

Page 39: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

What Is It Good for?

• Genome wide understanding of chromatin role (structure, functionality( in biology

• The use of all the methods we learned• Improve our understanding regarding various

mechanisms and processes within the nucleous• Develop new bioinformatic and biological

methods for research (advanced ChIP technics, combination with tiling microarrays, and data analyzing tools – normalizations, intergrated tools)

Page 40: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Where Do We Go Next?

• Characterization of lysine 56 of histone H3 as an acetylation site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Ozdemir A, Spicuglia S, Lasonder E, Vermeulen M, Campsteijn C, Stunnenberg HG, Logie C.

• Epigenomic mapping in Arabidopsis using tiling microarrays.Martienssen RA, Doerge RW, Colot V.

• The epigenetic breakdown of cancer cells: from DNA methylation to histone modifications.Ballestar E, Esteller M.

Page 41: Histone Modifications Seminar in Bioinformatics Saar Gershuni 2005

Questions?