Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization...race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the

Cooperative Comprehensive Multi-Modal Transportation Planning for Hillsborough County, Florida

Joint Meeting of the Citizens and Technical Advisory Committees

Wednesday, December 11, 2013, 1:15 pm

18th Floor, Planning Commission Boardroom

Please join us for a holiday lunch starting at noon!

AGENDA I. Call To Order & Introductions 1:15

II. Public Comment (3 minutes per speaker, please) 1:20

III. Approval of Minutes (November 13 CAC & November 18 1:25 TAC Minutes)

IV. Action Items

A. FDOT Draft Five-Year Tentative Work Program 1:30 (Roger Roscoe, FDOT District 7)

B. Bruce B. Bruce B. Downs Blvd. Peak Hour HOV Lane 1:45 Feasibility Study (Gena Torres, MPO staff)

V. Status Reports

A. Tri-County Access Plan (Michele Ogilvie, MPO staff) 2:00

B. Imagine 2040 Survey Results & Hybrid Scenario 2:15 (Steve Griffin, Planning Commission staff)

C. Downtown Transit Assets and Opportunities Study 2:30 (Rich Clarendon, MPO staff)

VI. Old Business & New Business

A. Legislative Policy Positions for 2014 (MPOAC)

B. Committee Elections To Be Held in January

VII. Adjournment

Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization 601 E Kennedy Boulevard, 18th floor, Tampa, Florida, 33601 · 813-272-5940 · planhillsborough.org

Commissioner Mark Sharpe Hillsborough County

MPO Chairman

Councilwoman Lisa Montelione City of Tampa

MPO Vice Chairman

Commissioner Kevin Beckner Hillsborough County

Mayor Frank Chillura

City of Tempe Terrace

Councilman Harry Cohen City of Tampa

Joe Lopano

Hillsborough Co. Aviation Authority

Commissioner Rick A. Lott City of Plant City

Commissioner Lesley “Les” Miller, Jr. Hillsborough County

Commissioner Sandra Murman Hillsborough County

Steve Polzin HART

Councilman Mike Suarez

City of Tampa

Joseph Waggoner Expressway Authority

Paul Anderson

Tampa Port Authority

Trent Green (Ex-Officio) The Planning Commission

Ramond A. Chiaramonte, AICP Executive Director

Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization

P.O. Box 1110 601 E. Kennedy, 18th Floor Tampa, Florida 33601-1110

P 813/272-5940 F 813/301-7172

http:\\ www.hillsboroughmpo.org e-mail: [email protected]

http://www.hillsboroughmpo.org/

mailto:[email protected]

Cooperative Comprehensive Multi-Modal Transportation Planning for Hillsborough County, Florida

The full agenda packet is available on the MPO’s website, www.hillsboroughmpo.org, or by calling (813) 272-5940. In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other nondiscrimination laws, public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the materials attached are provided here for research and educational purposes, and are distributed without profit to MPO Board members, MPO staff, or related committees or subcommittees the MPO supports. The MPO has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of attached articles nor is the MPO endorsed or sponsored by the originator. Persons wishing to use copyrighted material for purposes of their own that go beyond ‘fair use’ must first obtain permission from the copyright owner.

http://www.hillsboroughmpo.org/

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2013

MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Nancy Castellano called the meeting to order at 1:21 pm. The meeting was held in the Hillsborough County Planning Commission Boardroom. Members present: Lydia Reyes, Joanna Cheshire, Walter Niles, Wayne Traina, William “Jib” Reagan and Nancy Castellano Members excused: Ed Austin, Richard Harrison, Don Walden, Adam Fritz, Dennis Meyers, and Gloria Mills. Others present: Richard Clarendon, Linda Ferraro, Wally Blain, Gena Torres, Sarah McKinley, MPO staff; Linda Walker, HART; Roger Roscoe, FDOT; Nina Mabilleau, City of Tampa; David Bottomley, MetroPlan Orlando. PUBLIC COMMENT No public comment. CONSENT ITEMS A. Approval of Minutes (October 13, 2013) B. 2014 Calendar Ms. Cheshire made a motion to approve the consent items. The motion was seconded by Ms. Reyes and carried. ACTION ITEMS A. Public Participation Plan (PPP) Amendments Mr. Richard Clarendon stated that the purpose of the amendments is to reflect new tools that will be used in the plan, address MPO certification recommendations and to simplify the document. New tools such as Constant Contacts are being used to electronically transmit the CAC packets to the members and other agencies. Also, a new “Membership Form” tool has been added to the website for interested citizens to complete and submit.

CAC Minutes November 13, 2013

2

Some of the recommendations coming out the MPO’s Certification Review by the federal government included making public notice of Transportation Improvement Program changes more explicit. The PPP therefore proposes a 21 day public review period for major amendments to the Transportation Improvement Program and a 7 day public review period for minor amendments. Ms. Cheshire made a motion to approve the Public Participation Plan Amendments and forward to the MPO for approval. The motion was seconded by Mr. Reagan and carried. STATUS REPORTS A. 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update (LRTP):

1. Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs) Ms. Sarah McKinley, MPO staff stated that the purpose of this update is to review the current GOPs for consistencies and inconsistencies with the current 2040 LRTP. They are required as part of the MAP-21 legislation and are used to help guide the vision of the LRTP. There are three driving forces for the changes which are: 1) the preliminary results for the Imagine 2040 Survey; 2) guidance from the Policy Leadership Group and 3) MAP-21. Results from the Imagine 2040 Survey included three top priorities which are traffic congestion, job creation and available bus or rail. The current Goal II “Support economic vitality to foster the global competitiveness, productivity and efficiency of local and regional businesses” has now become the number one goal. Under discussion, members asked for examples of “cost effective” projects, and asked about the relationship between the GOPs & the Imagine 2040 initiative.

2. Needs Assessment Approach Ms. Gena Torres stated that the MPO staff has been reviewing how priorities in the Long Range Transportation Plan have been developed. The 2035 Transportation Plan was based on a weighting of priorities such as Safety, Congestion Reduction, etc., against a long list of needed projects ranging from road widening to sidewalks. In considering the 2040 LRTP update, staff looked at how some other regions set priorities, with examples from San Francisco and Minnesota.


3

The next step is to update the MPOs Needs Assessment list looking at several possible categories such as:

• Investments that preserve existing systems • Investments that reduce crash frequency & severity • Investments that minimize congestion for drivers & shippers • Investments that expand alternatives to driving • Investments that support the growth of economic activity centers

Under discussion, members suggested adding paratransit as an “alternative to driving.” B. Red Light running Camera Deployment Ms. Torres showed several videos of people running red lights in Tampa and Hillsborough County. Currently there are 42 cameras on state roads. The Tampa Police Department reported there were 121 crashes in the first year of the cameras being installed. The following year there were 108 crashes, a reduction of 10.74%. Using the same time frame, in the first year there were 71,459 violations. The next year shows 56,846 issued or 14,613 less, even with more cameras in the latter years. The reduction indicates a change in driving behavior. Under discussion, members wanted to know by what percentage crashes decreased following implementation of the cameras. Members also wanted to know where the proceeds from citations go and whether yellow light time has been made uniform across all signals. C. Transportation Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Ms. Allison Yeh, Planning Commission staff, stated that the Hillsborough County MPO, Planning Commission, Hillsborough County Public Works-Hazard Mitigation Section, University of South Florida, and the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Commission received a grant from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to conduct a pilot project to assess the resiliency of the transportation system to climate stressors in Hillsborough County. Federal, State DOT, and local resiliency planning information will be used to assess the transportation network’s vulnerability to sea level rise, storm surge, and flooding. The aim of the project is to support the incorporation of climate risk and transportation resiliency into the planning process. Specifically, the pilot project will:

• Identify vulnerable and critical links in the transportation system; and


4

• Determine the need for improvements to prevent, mitigate or adapt to inundation.

OLD BUSINESS/ NEW BUSINESS A. Next Meeting – December 11, 2013 Mr. Clarendon reminded the members that the next CAC meeting will be held December 11th and will be the annual Joint CAC/TAC meeting with lunch being provided at noon and the meeting to follow at 1:15 pm.


5

ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 2:20 pm.

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 2013

MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chairman Charles White called the meeting to order at 1:34 pm. The meeting was held in the Planning Commission Boardroom. Members present: Charles White, Steve Griffin, Calvin Thornton, Melanie Calloway, Melissa Zornitta, Jeanie Satchel, Jeff Sims (proxy for Reggie Sanford), Chris Bridges (proxy for Mike Williams), Tony Mantegna, Bob Frey (entered at 1:40) and Lorraine Duffy-Suarez. Members excused: Sheila Martin Others present: Wally Blain, Beth Alden, Gena Torres, Rich Clarendon, Sarah McKinley, Bud Whitehead, Linda Ferraro, MPO staff; Allison Yeh, Planning Commission; Roger Roscoe, FDOT; Alice Price, HCAA. PUBLIC COMMENT No public comment. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (October 21, 2013) Mr. Steve Griffin made a motion to approve the October 21, 2013 TAC minutes. The motion was seconded by Mr. Tony Mantegna and carried. ACTION ITEMS A. 2014 Meeting Calendar Mr. Blain reviewed the MPO meeting calendar for 2014 and stated that the January meeting would be held on the 4th Monday of the month due to the Martin Luther King Holiday. Mr. Griffin made a motion to approve the 2014 meeting calendar. The motion was seconded by Ms. Satchel and carried. B. Public Participation Plan Amendments

TAC Minutes November 18, 2013

2

Mr. Richard Clarendon stated that the purpose of the amendments is to reflect new tools that will be used in the plan, address MPO certification recommendations and to simplify the document. New tools such as Constant Contacts are being used to electronically transmit the TAC packets to the members and other agencies. Also, a new “Membership Form” tool has been added to the website for interested citizens to complete and submit. Some of the recommendations coming out the MPO’s Certification Review by the federal government included making public notice of Transportation Improvement Program changes more explicit. The PPP therefore proposes a 21 day public review period for major amendments to the Transportation Improvement Program and a 7 day public review period for minor amendments. Mr. Griffin made a motion to approve the Public Participation Plan Amendments and forward to the MPO for approval. The motion was seconded by Ms. Duffy-Suarez and carried. STATUS REPORT A. 2040 Plan goals and MAP-21 Ms. Sarah McKinley, MPO staff stated that the purpose of this update is to review the current GOPs for consistencies and inconsistencies with the current 2040 LRTP. They are required as part of the MAP-21 legislation and are used to help guide the vision of the LRTP. There are three driving forces for the changes which are: 1) the preliminary results for the Imagine 2040 Survey; 2) guidance from the Policy Leadership Group and 3) MAP-21. Results from the Imagine 2040 Survey included three top priorities which are traffic congestion, job creation and available bus or rail. The current Goal II “Support economic vitality to foster the global competitiveness, productivity and efficiency of local and regional businesses” has now become the number one goal. Ms. Melissa Zornitta stated that the goals relate to economic development and should be woven in more with the goals. Mr. Chris Bridges sated that the wording in Goal 6 is fine, but the objective should include cost efficiency solutions. He said that County Staff has more comments.


3

Chairman White felt that some of the items would be more appropriate in the Comprehensive Plan instead of the LRTP because they are land use related. He suggested having a meeting with staff to go over components of the plan. Ms. McKinley indicated that a follow-up meeting would be scheduled with staff to discuss their comments. B. Red Light running Camera Deployment Ms. Torres showed several videos of people running red lights in Tampa and Hillsborough County. Currently there are 42 cameras on state roads. The Tampa Police Department reported there were 121 crashes in the first year of the cameras being installed. The following year there were 108 crashes, a reduction of 10.74%. Using the same time frame, in the first year there were 71,459 violations. The next year shows 56,846 issued or 14,613 less, even with more cameras in the latter years. The reduction indicates a change in driving behavior. C. Transportation Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Ms. Allison Yeh, Planning Commission staff, stated that the Hillsborough County MPO, Planning Commission, Hillsborough County Public Works-Hazard Mitigation Section, University of South Florida, and the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Commission received a grant from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to conduct a pilot project to assess the resiliency of the transportation system to climate stressors in Hillsborough County. Federal, State DOT, and local resiliency planning information will be used to assess the transportation network’s vulnerability to sea level rise, storm surge, and flooding. The aim of the project is to support the incorporation of climate risk and transportation resiliency into the planning process. Specifically, the pilot project will:

• Identify vulnerable and critical links in the transportation system; and • Determine the need for improvements to prevent, mitigate or adapt to

inundation.

D. Tampa Bay TMA Formation Ms. Beth Alden stated that early this year at MPO committee meetings and MPO meeting, discussions took place as to whether or not the Hillsborough MPO should merge with the Pinellas and Pasco MPOs which are the other two MPOs in the Census-designated Tampa Bay Transportation Management Area (TMA). A joint board


4

workshop with the Pinellas and Pasco MPOs, held May 31, recommended retaining separate MPOs but improving tri-county planning and priority-setting. A second joint board workshop of the three MPOs was held on September 13. At that meeting, it was agreed to form a new group called the "Tampa Bay TMA," to be made up of three members of each MPO board. FDOT and TBARTA will also be represented. Voting may be weighted by population. The group proposed to meet about every other month for the first year, and focus on two activities: determining priorities for the tri-county area; and advancing an "early project," which was suggested to be managed lanes with bus rapid transit connecting Wesley Chapel to the beaches. The Hillsborough County MPO members are Commissioner Mark Sharpe, Commissioner Sandra Murman and Councilwoman Lisa Montelione. The group will meet five times in 2014. OLD BUSINESS AND NEW BUSINESS A. Functional Classification Map Update

Mr. Blain stated that this item was brought before the TAC and the TAC passed a motion to have staff coordinate with the City of Tampa and FDOT on concerns they had about some of the roads on the Functional Classification Map. Since that time, they have met and several changes have been made to the map. The draft map was transmitted for preliminary review by FHWA and FDOT. With the review completed, a finalized map is being prepared which incorporates comments received from FDOT and FHWA. B. 2040 LRTP Existing Plus Committee Network

Mr. Blain stated that the model is the technical tool used to forecast future travel demand for the LRTP. One component of that exercise is the existing plus committed roadway and transit networks. Comments are to be sent to DOT by the end of the week. Mr. Blain made the committee members aware that a draft map is available for their review and comment. DOT will hold a web-based public hearing on December 16th for the 2014/2015 Five-Year Tentative Work program. The MPO is a satellite location for viewing this public hearing. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 2:30 pm.

Agenda

Present

Summa

RecommAction:

Prepare

Attachm

a Item:

ter:

ary: TdT

f

C

s

Aw

o

mended e

ed By:

ments:

W

S

Bo

Five-Yea

Roger Rosc

The Floriddeveloped This budgupcoming for the fopresented a

Consistent programmibe consisteBoard, on Ssubmitted t

A public hewebinar avhttps://wor at the M

MPO comm2014.

Forward thendorseme

Wally Blain

FDOT DistrStatus of MNotice of D

Hillsbo 601 E Kennedy

oard & C

ar Tentat

coe, FDOT D

da Departmtheir annuet, knownFiscal Year

our followinare for the

with fedng of federent with prSeptember to FDOT fo

earing will bvailable at www2.goto

PO offices.

ments can b

he FDOT Went

rict TentativMPO adopteDecember 1

rough M

y Boulevard, 18th

Commit

tive Work

District 7

ment of Tual budget n as the r as well asng years. 2014/2015

deral rulesral funds foiorities ado3, 2013, a

r use in dev

be held by F

omeeting.

e submitted

Work Prog

ve Work Prod priorities6th Public H

Metropol

h floor, Tampa, F

ttee Age

k Progra

Transportat for transpWork Progs anticipate The Wor

5 – 2018/20

s and staor transportopted by thadopted priveloping th

FDOT on De

.com/regi

d to FDOT

gram to th

ogram in Tentativ

Hearing.

itan Plan

Florida, 33601 ·

enda It

am

tion (FDOportation pgram, coved project rk Program019 Fiscal Y

ate statutetation projehe MPO. Tiorities whiis Work Pro

ecember 16

ster/5472

by January

he MPO B

ve Work Pro

nning O

813-272-5940

tem

OT) has projects. vers the

funding m being Years.

es, the ects is to The MPO ch were ogram.

6th as a

245394

y 22,

Board for

ogram

rganizat

· HillsboroughM

tion

MPO.org

Date: November 12, 2013

TENTATIVE

** DRAFT **

Facility Item No. Phase Fund 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19

DRAFT Five Year Tentative Work ProgramFY July 1, 2014 Through June 30, 2019District Seven Florida Department of Transportation

HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

HIGHWAYSALEXANDER STREET 4352761

PLANT CITY @ NGCN: 624564J

RAIL SAFETY PROJECT

INSTALL REMOTE RADIO KEYDOWN

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:PROJECT LENGTH: .001MI

RRU RHP 12,275 0 0 0 0

12,275 0 0 0 0Total:

BAYSHORE BLVD 4130923

FROM GANDY BLVD TO S HOWARD AVE

BIKE PATH/TRAIL

CONSTRUCT A SB BICYCLE LANE

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:PROJECT LENGTH: 2.455MI

CST TALT 0 0 2,087,800 0 0

0 0 2,087,800 0 0Total:

BOUGAINVILLEA AVE 4327151

FROM 30TH STREET TO 46TH STREET

BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK

COT WALK/BIKE PHASE 1

FPN:


CST TALT 0 0 323,700 0 0

0 0 323,700 0 0Total:

36

PDE-Project Development Environment; PE-Preliminary Engineering; ROW-Right of Way; CST-Construction; RRU-Rail Road/Utilities; INC-Incentive; ENV-Environmental Mitigation; CAP-Capital Grant; OPS-Operations Grant; LAR-Local Advance Reimbursement; DSB-Design Build; ADM-Administration



HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

BRIDGE PAINTING 4308023

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY VARIOUS LOCATIONS

BRIDGE - PAINTING

DESIGN G/W 430802 2

FPN:


CST BRRP 0 1,615,313 0 0 0

CST DIH 0 35,176 0 0 0

PE BRRP 145,000 0 0 0 0

145,000 1,650,489 0 0 0Total:

BROADWAY 4330711

FROM US 41 TO N 62ND ST CSX INTRMD

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT

FPN:


CST SA 0 0 1,431,802 0 0

0 0 1,431,802 0 0Total:

CITY OF TAMPA 4242131

TRAFFIC SIGNAL MANAGEMENT PHASE 1

ATMS - ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MGMT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CST SU 1,418,770 0 0 0 0

CST TRIP 1,178,681 0 0 0 0

2,597,451 0 0 0 0Total:

37




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

CR 580/SAM ALLEN RD 2578623

FM W OF SR39/BUCHMAN HWY TO E OF PARK RD

ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT

2 TO 4 LANES

FPN:


CST CM 0 0 0 1,786,368 0

CST SA 0 0 0 1,003,233 0

CST SU 0 0 0 21,531,107 0

ENV SA 153,373 0 0 0 0

ROW SA 104,999 0 0 0 0

ROW SU 2,000,000 1,657,701 0 0 0

RRU SA 0 0 30,000 400,000 0

RRU SU 0 0 0 600,000 0

2,258,372 1,657,701 30,000 25,320,708 0Total:

CR 581 (BB DOWNS BL) 4054924

FROM PEBBLE CREEK DR TO COUNTY LINE RD


4 TO 8 LANES, SEGMENT D

FPN:


CST DIH 1,000 0 0 0 0

CST LF 1,853,100 0 0 0 0

CST LFP 5,000,000 0 0 0 0

CST TRIP 5,000,000 0 0 0 0

11,854,100 0 0 0 0Total:

38




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

CR582/KNIGHTS GRIFF 4343171

FM ITCHEPACKESASSA CK TO BR # 100265

BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

BRIDGE IN-KIND REPLACEMENT ON CR582/KNIGHTS GRIFFIN RD FROM

FPN:


CST ACSB 0 0 1,143,413 0 0

PE ACSB 739,000 0 0 0 0

739,000 0 1,143,413 0 0Total:

CYPRESS STREET 4327141

FROM SR 60/U-PATH TO N WESTSHORE BLVD

BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK


FPN:


CST TALU 477,350 0 0 0 0

477,350 0 0 0 0Total:

DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT 4347811

5 LOCATIONS-KENNEDY, HILLSBOROUGH, US 301

DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS

KENNEDY @ HENDERON,PACKWOOD, BRUSH/ HILLSBOROUGH @ HOWARD

FPN:


CST DDR 0 0 348,793 0 0

CST DIH 0 0 45,692 0 0

PE DDR 277,000 0 0 0 0

PE DIH 1,000 0 0 0 0

278,000 0 394,485 0 0Total:

39




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT 4347812

4 LOCATIONS DALE MABRY AND GANDY

DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS

DALE MABRY @ HAMILTON,WALLACE, SWANN/GANDY @ W OF LOIS

FPN:


CST DDR 0 0 389,596 0 0

CST DIH 0 0 51,037 0 0

PE DDR 259,000 0 0 0 0

PE DIH 1,000 0 0 0 0

260,000 0 440,633 0 0Total:

GATX DRIVE 4335861

FROM MARITIME BOULEVARD TO GUY N VERGER BOULEVARD


2 TO 4 LANES

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CST CIGP 0 1,250,000 0 0 0

CST LFP 0 1,250,000 0 0 0

0 2,500,000 0 0 0Total:

HOOKERS POINT 4353771

RAIL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1

RAILROAD CROSSING

RAIL IMPROVEMENTS THROUGHOUT THE PORT'S CARGO YARD

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CST CIGP 0 0 0 2,376,952 0

CST LF 0 0 0 123,048 0

CST LFP 0 0 0 2,376,952 0

0 0 0 4,876,952 0Total:

40




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

HOOKERS POINT 4353781

RAIL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II

RAILROAD CROSSING

RAIL IMPROVEMENTS THROUGHOUT THE PORT'S CARGO YARD

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CST CIGP 0 0 0 0 2,500,000

CST LFP 0 0 0 0 2,500,000

0 0 0 0 5,000,000Total:

I-275 (HOWARD FRKL) 4229044

FM N OF HOWARD FRANKLAND TO S OF SR 60


FPN:


DSB ACBR 0 0 0 0 6,052,535

PE ACBR 0 0 0 0 121,000

0 0 0 0 6,173,535Total:

I-275 (SR 93) 4125312

I-275/SR 60 INTERCHANGE

INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES

CYPRESS ST BRD S ABUTMENT TO 275 GEN USE LANE/NB RAMP;ADV RW

FPN:


ROW DDR 0 0 8,636,403 0 0

ROW DS 0 1,810,681 2,500,000 3,500,000 8,564,776

ROW SA 0 0 0 6,469,327 0

ROW SU 0 1,496,651 500,000 0 0

ROW TRIP 0 1,496,651 500,000 0 0

0 4,803,983 12,136,403 9,969,327 8,564,776Total:

41




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

I-275 (SR 93) 4325791

FROM S OF NORTH BLVD TO S OF FLORIBRASKA AVE

RIGID PAVEMENT REHABILITATION

4 LANES

FPN:


CST ACNP 0 2,226,225 0 0 0

0 2,226,225 0 0 0Total:

I-275 (SR 93) 4326071

FM W OF NB/EB KENNEDY RMP TO E OF SR60/MEMORIAL HWY

RESURFACING

4 LANES

FPN:


CST ACNP 0 3,075,545 0 0 0

0 3,075,545 0 0 0Total:

I-275 (SR 93) 4335351

FM N OF HOWARD FRANKLAND TO S OF LOIS AVENUE

INTERCHANGE (NEW)

FPN:


PE ACNP 0 0 0 0 16,577,000

0 0 0 0 16,577,000Total:

42




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

I-275 (SR 93) SB 4335352

FM N OF REO STREET TO S OF LOIS AVENUE

INTERCHANGE (NEW)

FPN:


PE ACNP 0 0 0 0 9,168,000

0 0 0 0 9,168,000Total:

I-275/I-4 2586431

FROM N HILLSBOROUGH RIVER TO DOWNTOWN INTERCHANGE

INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT

OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS RAMP MODIFICATIONS

FPN:


ROW BNDS 392,522 0 0 0 0

ROW BNIR 3,668,785 1,550,000 0 0 0

ROW DDR 4,303,138 0 1,087,900 0 0

ROW DIH 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0

ROW DS 201,055 210,000 42,000 0 0

8,570,500 1,765,000 1,134,900 0 0Total:

I275/SR93 NB FLYOVER 4335355

FROM SR 60 EB TO I-275 NB

INTERCHANGE RAMP (NEW)

FPN:


PE ACNP 0 0 0 0 3,338,000

0 0 0 0 3,338,000Total:

43




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

I-275/SR93 NB XPR LN 4335354

FM N OF HOWARD FRANKLAND TO S OF TRASK STREET

INTERCHANGE (NEW)

FPN:


PE ACNP 0 0 0 0 7,638,000

0 0 0 0 7,638,000Total:

I-4 (SR 400) 4303351

FM I-75 (SR 93A) TO EAST OF WILLIAMS RD


INCLUDING ENTRANCE RAMPS FR NB I-75 TO SB I-75

FPN:


PE DDR 0 0 0 122,000 0

PE DIH 0 0 0 1,000 0

0 0 0 123,000 0Total:

I-4 (SR 400) 4303361

FROM TAMPA BYPASS CANAL TO EAST OF I-75

ADD LANES & REHABILITATE PVMNT

FPN:


PE DIH 0 0 0 0 1,000

PE DS 0 0 0 0 1,138,000

0 0 0 0 1,139,000Total:

44




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

I-75 (SR 93A) 4289531

FM WB SR60 ENTRANCE RAMP TO S OF CSX/CR 574


IMPROVE WB SR 60 TO NB I-75 ENTRANCE RAMP. INCLUDES 2 LANE

FPN:


PE ACNP 2,194,000 0 0 0 0

2,194,000 0 0 0 0Total:

I-75 (SR 93A) 4289561

FM S OF SELMON EXP OVRPSS TO N OF SR 60


EB SR 60 TO SB I-75 RAMP PLUS ALL SB CD RD WIDENING/NEW CST

FPN:


PE DDR 1,368,000 0 0 0 0

1,368,000 0 0 0 0Total:

I-75 (SR 93A) 4292511

FM S OF CSX/BROADWAY AVE TO EB/WB I-4 EXIT RAMP


INTERIM INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT

FPN:


PE DDR 2,325,000 0 0 0 0

2,325,000 0 0 0 0Total:

45




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

I-75 (SR 93A) NB/SB 4322711

FR OVER ALAFIA RIVER TO BRIDGE # 100358/359

BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION

FULL DECK REPLACEMENT OF DEFICIENT PANELS

FPN:


CST BRRP 0 0 9,963,558 0 0

CST DIH 0 0 1,402,891 0 0

PE BRRP 913,000 0 0 0 0

913,000 0 11,366,449 0 0Total:

I-75 (SR93A)& SR 60 4289551

FM S OF SR60 @ SLIP RMP TO N OF SR 60 AT CSX BRG


RECONSTR EB SR 60 TO NB I-75 LOOP RAMP. CONST NEW NB CD RD

FPN:


PE DDR 0 1,275,000 0 0 0

PE DIH 1,000 0 0 0 0

1,000 1,275,000 0 0 0Total:

I-75(SR93A)NB ONRAMP 4289541

FROM EB/WB I-4 TO SOUTH OF BYPASS CANAL


RAMP MODIFICATION ONLY

FPN:


CST ACNP 0 0 0 0 18,284,445

PE DDR 1,980,000 0 0 0 0

1,980,000 0 0 0 18,284,445Total:

46




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

I75(SR93A)OVER CR574 4307051

FM WOODBERRY RD TO E MLK JR BLVD


FULL DECK REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISTING DECK PANEL BRIDGE

FPN:


CST BRRP 0 0 0 3,408,951 0

CST DIH 0 0 0 98,489 0

PE BRRP 0 0 287,000 0 0

PE DIH 0 0 1,000 0 0

RRU BRRP 0 0 20,000 75,000 0

0 0 308,000 3,582,440 0Total:

I-75(SR93A)SB OFFRMP 4289571

FROM S OF BYPASS CANAL TO EB/WB I-4


RAMP MODIFICATION ONLY

FPN:


PE DDR 1,482,000 0 0 0 0

1,482,000 0 0 0 0Total:

LONG BRIDGE REPAIR 4307061



GOES WITH 430706 2

FPN:


CST BRRP 0 2,020,678 0 0 0

CST DIH 0 112,211 0 0 0

PE BRRP 180,000 0 0 0 0

180,000 2,132,889 0 0 0Total:

47




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

MARITIME BOULEVARD 4353591

FROM GATX DRIVE TO CONTAINER YARD ENTRANC

NEW ROAD CONSTRUCTION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CST CIGP 0 1,250,000 0 0 0

CST LFP 0 1,250,000 0 0 0

0 2,500,000 0 0 0Total:

MARTIME BOULEVARD 4335841

FROM SHORELINE DRIVE TO GATX DRIVE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION - 2 LANE

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CST CIGP 900,000 0 0 0 0

CST LFP 900,000 0 0 0 0

1,800,000 0 0 0 0Total:

PALM AVENUE 4327161

FROM NORTH BOULEVARD TO NEBRASKA AVENUE

BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK


FPN:


CST TALT 679,400 0 0 0 0

679,400 0 0 0 0Total:

48




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

PORTWIDE ACCESS 4353601

IMPROVEMENTS

NEW ROAD CONSTRUCTION

RECONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS ROAD PORTWIDE

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CST CIGP 750,000 0 0 0 0

CST LFP 750,000 0 0 0 0

1,500,000 0 0 0 0Total:

SR 39/N WHEELER ST 4347371

FROM REYNOLDS ST TO N OF I-4 INTERCHANGE

RESURFACING

2 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 0 0 1,139,877 0 0

CST DIH 0 0 129,376 0 0

PE DDR 514,000 0 0 0 0

514,000 0 1,269,253 0 0Total:

SR 39/REDMAN PARKWAY 4326461

FR N OF CHARLIE GRIFFIN TO SR 600/US 92/BAKER ST

RESURFACING

4 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 0 0 856,418 0 0

CST DIH 0 0 21,820 0 0

CST DS 0 0 1,476,140 0 0

PE DS 1,109,000 0 0 0 0

1,109,000 0 2,354,378 0 0Total:

49




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

SR 566 /THONOTOSASSA 4255031

FROM W BAKER ST TO N OF I-4

RESURFACING

4 LANES

FPN:


CST DIH 0 0 110,477 0 0

CST DS 0 0 1,753,042 0 0

0 0 1,863,519 0 0Total:

SR 569 (39TH ST) 4338661

FROM N OF E ADAMO DR TO S OF E 7TH AVE

RAILROAD CROSSING

REPLACE CROSSING,NGCN: 624370D (A-LINE) 624467A (S-LINE)

FPN:


CST DDR 0 162,816 0 0 0

CST DIH 0 25,204 0 0 0

PE DDR 237,000 0 0 0 0

PE DIH 1,000 0 0 0 0

RRU DDR 30,000 800,000 0 0 0

268,000 988,020 0 0 0Total:

SR 569/39TH/40TH ST 4290611

FROM SR 60/E ADAMO DR TO S OF E 15TH AVE

RESURFACING

2 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 1,302,868 0 0 0 0

CST DIH 7,210 0 0 0 0

CST HSP 271,405 0 0 0 0

1,581,483 0 0 0 0Total:

50




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

SR 574 (E MLK BLVD) 4290591

FROM 42ND ST TO E OF I-4

RESURFACING

2 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 0 2,193,246 0 0 0

CST DIH 0 74,200 0 0 0

0 2,267,446 0 0 0Total:

SR 574 (MLK BLVD) 2558933

FROM E OF PARSONS AVE TO E OF KINGSWAY RD


3 TO 4 LANES

FPN:


CST CM 0 1,786,944 0 0 0

CST SU 0 2,569,460 0 0 0

RRU DDR 0 50,000 0 0 0

RRU LF 0 1,000 0 0 0

ROW DDR 177,725 0 0 0 0

ROW DS 211,385 0 0 0 0

ROW SA 2,969,205 1,628,940 0 0 0

ROW SU 263,685 0 0 0 0

3,622,000 6,036,344 0 0 0Total:

51




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

SR 574 (MLK BLVD) 2558934

FROM EAST OF KINGSWAY RD TO E OF MCINTOSH RD


2 TO 4 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 0 0 0 21,878,255 0

CST DIH 0 0 0 561,000 0

ENV DDR 10,959 0 0 0 0

ROW DDR 671,250 49,000 1,204,845 0 0

ROW DIH 490,000 290,000 280,000 0 0

ROW DS 446,406 1,496,651 4,337,587 0 0

ROW SU 8,108,721 3,953,540 0 0 0

9,727,336 5,789,191 5,822,432 22,439,255 0Total:

SR 574 (MLK BLVD) 4274951

@ N DOVER RD

RAILROAD CROSSING

FPN:


CST DDR 0 25,016 0 0 0

CST DIH 0 5,478 0 0 0

PE DDR 176,000 0 0 0 0

PE DIH 1,000 0 0 0 0

RRU DDR 10,000 125,000 0 0 0

187,000 155,494 0 0 0Total:

52




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

SR 574 (MLK BLVD) 4290721

FROM W OF VALRICO RD TO E OF MCINTOSH RD

RESURFACING

2 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 730,270 0 0 0 0

CST DIH 95,217 0 0 0 0

RRU DDR 50,000 0 0 0 0

875,487 0 0 0 0Total:

SR 574 (MLK BLVD) 4306851

AT GALLAGHER ROAD

ADD LEFT TURN LANE(S)

FPN:


CST DDR 849,202 0 0 0 0

CST DIH 58,730 0 0 0 0

RRU DDR 75,000 0 0 0 0

982,932 0 0 0 0Total:

SR 574 (MLK BLVD) 4338651

FM E IDA ST TO W OF 30TH FM E OF 38TH ST TO 39TH

RAILROAD CROSSING

RR REPLACEMENT @ NGCN: 626906N AND NGCN: 624837B

FPN:


CST DDR 0 0 84,007 0 0

CST DIH 0 0 14,894 0 0

PE DDR 0 234,000 0 0 0

PE DIH 0 1,000 0 0 0

RRU DDR 0 20,000 420,000 0 0

0 255,000 518,901 0 0Total:

53




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

SR 574/W REYNOLDS ST 4347361

FROM E OF TURKEY CREEK RD TO THONOTOSASSA RD

RESURFACING

2 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 0 0 1,760,874 0 0

CST DIH 0 0 199,859 0 0

PE DDR 659,000 0 0 0 0

659,000 0 1,960,733 0 0Total:

SR 582 (FOWLER AVE) 4290772

FM W OF NEBRASKA AVE TO W OF BRUCE B DOWNS BLV

RESURFACING

6 LANES

FPN:


CST HSP 1,124,966 0 0 0 0

CST SA 3,857,530 0 0 0 0

4,982,496 0 0 0 0Total:

SR 583 (56TH ST) 4307111

FM N US92/SR600/HILLS AVE TO N OF HENRY AVENUE

RAILROAD CROSSING

CSX: 624849-V

FPN:


CST DIH 0 40,202 0 0 0

CST DS 0 289,751 0 0 0

RRU DDR 350,000 0 0 0 0

350,000 329,953 0 0 0Total:

54




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

SR 60 4275011

FM W OF VALRICO STATION TO WEST OF SKYWOOD DR

RAILROAD CROSSING

FPN:


CST DDR 0 204,156 0 0 0

CST DIH 0 31,603 0 0 0

PE DDR 190,000 0 0 0 0

PE DIH 1,000 0 0 0 0

RRU DDR 20,000 500,000 0 0 0

211,000 735,759 0 0 0Total:

SR 60 (ADAMO DR) 4055252

FROM E OF US 301 TO W OF FALKENBURG RD


4 TO 6 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 0 0 14,955,210 0 0

CST DIH 0 0 722,197 0 0

RRU LF 0 0 1,782,580 0 0

0 0 17,459,987 0 0Total:

SR 60 (ADAMO DR) 4347381

FROM E OF FALKENBURG RD TO W OF LAKE KATHY ENTR

RESURFACING

7 LANES

FPN:


CST SA 0 0 3,535,682 0 0

PE DS 603,000 0 0 0 0

603,000 0 3,535,682 0 0Total:

55




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

SR 60 (CCAMPBLL CWY) 4245072

FM PINELLAS COUNTY LINE TO N OF ROCKY POINT DR

ITS FREEWAY MANAGEMENT

FPN:


CST DIH 0 0 0 0 449,599

CST DITS 0 0 0 0 5,307,852

CST DS 0 0 0 0 2,870,102

PE DIH 0 0 0 500 0

PE DITS 0 0 0 0 95,000

0 0 0 500 8,722,553Total:

SR 60 (KENNEDY BLVD) 4168561

FROM ARMENIA AVE TO BREVARD AVE

TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATE

5 LOCATIONS

FPN:


CST DDR 0 0 0 0 1,773,387

CST DIH 0 0 0 0 75,075

PE DDR 856,000 0 0 0 0

ROW DDR 0 0 1,446,300 0 0

ROW DIH 0 0 160,000 0 0

856,000 0 1,606,300 0 1,848,462Total:

SR 60 (SR 589) 4335353

FROM N OF INDEPENDENCE TO I-275 AT WESTSHORE

INTERCHANGE (NEW)

FPN:


PE ACNP 0 0 0 0 9,187,755

0 0 0 0 9,187,755Total:

56




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

SR 60 (SR 685) 4289691

FROM SR600 (DALE MABRY) TO S WOODLYNNE AVE

RESURFACING

4 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 0 3,276,642 0 0 0

CST DIH 0 10,600 0 0 0

0 3,287,242 0 0 0Total:

SR 60 (W KENNEDY BL) 4311321

FM W OF N/S CHURCH AVE TO SR685/HENDERSON/MANTANZAS

RESURFACING

4 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 38,259 0 0 0 0

CST DIH 20,600 0 0 0 0

CST HSP 277,688 0 0 0 0

CST SA 1,105,308 0 0 0 0

1,441,855 0 0 0 0Total:

SR 60 ADAMO 4352771

@ NGCN: 624820X

RAIL SAFETY PROJECT


FPN:


RRU RHP 12,275 0 0 0 0

12,275 0 0 0 0Total:

57




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

SR 60 VALRICO 4352751

@ NGCN: 624451H

RAIL SAFETY PROJECT


FPN:


RRU RHP 12,275 0 0 0 0

12,275 0 0 0 0Total:

SR 676 (CAUSEWAY BL) 2555991

FROM 1/4 MI W OF US 41 TO 1/4 E OF US 301


2 TO 4 LANES

FPN:


ROW DS 1,067,770 0 0 0 0

1,067,770 0 0 0 0Total:

SR 685 (FLORIDA AVE) 4338621

FROM N OF W HUMPHREY ST TO N OF W BUSCH BLVD

RAILROAD CROSSING

FPN:


CST DDR 0 0 0 150,685 0

CST DIH 0 0 0 23,326 0

PE DDR 0 0 103,000 0 0

PE DIH 0 0 1,000 0 0

RRU DDR 0 0 10,000 300,000 0

0 0 114,000 474,011 0Total:

58




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

SUBSTRUCTURE REPAIR 4307512



FPN:


CST BRRP 1,001,830 0 0 0 0

CST DIH 32,171 0 0 0 0

1,034,001 0 0 0 0Total:

SUBSTRUCTURE REPAIR 4324322

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY VARIOUS PROJECTS


FPN:


CST BRRP 1,269,269 0 0 0 0

CST DIH 130,969 0 0 0 0

1,400,238 0 0 0 0Total:

US 301 (SR 43) 4154893

FM SR 674/SUNCITY CTR BL TO CR 672/BALM ROAD


2 TO 6 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 0 27,897,605 0 0 0

CST DIH 0 530,000 0 0 0

CST DS 0 15,448,048 0 0 0

0 43,875,653 0 0 0Total:

59




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

US 41 (SR 45) 4314951

FROM US 92/US 41/ SR 600 TO S OF E SLIGH AVE

RESURFACING

4 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 1,656,344 0 0 0 0

CST DIH 20,600 0 0 0 0

CST HSP 347,934 0 0 0 0

2,024,878 0 0 0 0Total:

US 41 GIBSONTON 4340291

FROM N OF OLD US 41A TO S OF ARCHIE CREEK

RAILROAD CROSSING

NGCN:624797 CSX TO REPLACE EXISTING CROSSING WITH A PLATFORM

FPN:


CST DDR 0 0 0 414,579 0

CST DIH 0 0 0 54,310 0

PE DDR 0 0 233,000 0 0

PE DIH 0 0 1,000 0 0

RRU DDR 0 0 10,000 350,000 0

0 0 244,000 818,889 0Total:

US 41(SR 569/N 40TH) 4314921

FROM S OF E 15TH AVE TO S OF E CONOVER ST

RESURFACING

6 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 0 110,474 0 0 0

CST DIH 0 53,000 0 0 0

CST DS 0 4,639,322 0 0 0

0 4,802,796 0 0 0Total:

60




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

US 41(SR45/NEBRASKA) 4290771

FROM N OF FOWLER AVE TO S OF LINNWOOD DR

RESURFACING

4 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 813,829 0 0 0 0

CST DIH 48,985 0 0 0 0

862,814 0 0 0 0Total:

US 60 HOPEWELL 4348251

VIRTUAL WEIGH STATION

MCCO WEIGH STATION STATIC/WIM

REMODEL BLDG & RAMPS/AD VIRTUAL SCREENING SITES IN BOTH DIRS

FPN:


CST DIH 0 75,644 0 0 0

CST DWS 0 1,068,477 0 0 0

PE DIH 28,367 0 0 0 0

PE DWS 189,111 0 0 0 0

217,478 1,144,121 0 0 0Total:

USB 41 (SR 45/SR 60) 4271712

FM W OF 14TH ST TO E OF 19TH ST

TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATE

TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULLED OUT FM RESURFACING ON SEG 1 DUE TO R/W

FPN:


CST DDR 0 412,446 0 0 0

CST DIH 0 52,162 0 0 0

0 464,608 0 0 0Total:

61




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

USB 41(SR60/685/45) 4289681

FROM E MERIDIAN AVE TO W OF N 14TH ST

RESURFACING

4 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 850,162 0 0 0 0

CST DIH 90,996 0 0 0 0

941,158 0 0 0 0Total:

USB41(SR685/FLORIDA) 4314901

FROM N OF BEARSS AVE TO NEBRASKA AVE

RESURFACING

4 LANES

FPN:


CST DDR 0 1,488,770 0 0 0

CST DIH 0 21,200 0 0 0

0 1,509,970 0 0 0Total:

WILLOW AVENUE 4327171

FROM SWANN AVENUE TO MAIN STREET

BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK


FPN:


CST TALT 0 0 395,900 0 0

CST TALU 0 0 36,000 0 0

0 0 431,900 0 0Total:

FLP: AVIATION

62




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

PETER O'KNIGHT 4296411

AIRPORT

AVIATION REVENUE/OPERATIONAL

HANGAR EXTENSION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 2,121,300 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 530,400 0 0 0

0 2,651,700 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


HANGAR G REHABILTATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 98,600 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 316,600 0 0 0

0 415,200 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT

AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECT

PARKING LOT REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 52,100 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 52,200 0 0 0

0 104,300 0 0 0Total:

63




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


TIE-DOWN AREA G & H RECONSTRUCTION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 480,300 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 120,100 0 0

0 0 600,400 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


TIE-DOWN AREA J REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 63,500 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 15,900 0 0

0 0 79,400 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


HANGAR A REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 107,200 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 26,900 0 0

0 0 134,100 0 0Total:

64




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


RUNWAY 4/22 REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 34,306 23,690 0 0 0

CAP DPTO 302,371 183,898 0 0 0

CAP LF 2,255,735 0 0 0 0

2,592,412 207,588 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT



FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 408,600 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 102,200 0

0 0 0 510,800 0Total:


AIRPORT


TAXIWAY F REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 225,920 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 56,480 0

0 0 0 282,400 0Total:

65




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


REPAIR SEAWALL

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 696,640

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 174,160

0 0 0 0 870,800Total:


AIRPORT


FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 240,000

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 60,000

0 0 0 0 300,000Total:

PLANT CITY AIRPORT 4225512


HANGAR EXPANSION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 1,841,414 0 0 0 0

CAP DPTO 158,586 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 638,700 0 0 0 0

2,638,700 0 0 0 0Total:

66




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013



HANGAR A REHBILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 173,120 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 43,280 0 0 0 0

216,400 0 0 0 0Total:



HANGAR C REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 91,360 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 22,840 0 0 0

0 114,200 0 0 0Total:



EXPAND HANGAR FACILITES

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 959,200

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 2,717,500

0 0 0 0 3,676,700Total:

67




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013



REHABILITATE MAINTENANCE FACILITY

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 240,000

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 60,000

0 0 0 0 300,000Total:

TAMPA EXECUTIVE 4280621

AIRPORT


HANGAR REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 166,000 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 41,600 0 0 0 0

207,600 0 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


APRON A REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 69,000 0 0 0

CAP FAA 0 300,000 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 69,100 0 0 0

0 438,100 0 0 0Total:

68




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT

AVIATION SAFETY PROJECT

AUTOMATIC GATES REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 162,720 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 40,680 0 0 0

0 203,400 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


HANGAR EXPANSION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 0 103,791 0 0

CAP DPTO 0 0 2,224,483 0 0

CAP FAA 0 0 349,800 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 1,008,200 0 0

0 0 3,686,274 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 85,000 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 24,900 0 0

0 0 109,900 0 0Total:

69




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


TAXI-THRU HANGARS REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 210,000 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 56,600 0 0

0 0 266,600 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


TAXIWAY D REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 172,480 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 43,120 0

0 0 0 215,600 0Total:


AIRPORT


TAXIWAY E REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 849,440 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 212,360 0

0 0 0 1,061,800 0Total:

70




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


TAXIWAY F REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 575,118 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 148,020 0

0 0 0 723,138 0Total:


AIRPORT


RUNWAY 5/23 AND ASSOCIATED TAXIWAY LIGHTING REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 415,000 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 415,000 0

0 0 0 830,000 0Total:


AIRPORT


RUNWAY 5/24 AND ASSOCIATED TAXIWAY SIGNAGE REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 288,600 0

CAP FAA 0 0 0 450,000 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 138,700 0

0 0 0 877,300 0Total:

71




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


RUNWAY 5/23 MALSR LIGHT POLES REPLACEMENTS

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 127,900 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 32,000 0

0 0 0 159,900 0Total:


AIRPORT


RUNWAY 5/23 PAPI REPLACEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 166,000 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 41,600 0

0 0 0 207,600 0Total:


AIRPORT



FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 72,800 0

CAP FAA 0 0 0 2,619,600 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 218,300 0

0 0 0 2,910,700 0Total:

72




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


RUNWAY 5/234 REILS REPLACEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 84,300 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 84,300 0

0 0 0 168,600 0Total:


AIRPORT


TAXIWAY C REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 385,360 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 96,340 0

0 0 0 481,700 0Total:


AIRPORT


RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE TREE TRIMMING

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 407,600

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 101,900

0 0 0 0 509,500Total:

73




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


REHABILITATE SERVICE ROAD

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 170,240

CAP FAA 0 0 0 0 450,000

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 42,560

0 0 0 0 662,800Total:


AIRPORT


FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 120,400

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 30,100

0 0 0 0 150,500Total:


AIRPORT


REHABILITATE TERMINAL BUILDING

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 284,240

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 71,060

0 0 0 0 355,300Total:

74




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


REHABILITATE MAINTENANCE FACILITY

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 240,000

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 60,000

0 0 0 0 300,000Total:

TAMPA INTERNATIONAL 4157591

AIRPORT


TERMINAL AND AIRFIELD REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 294,900 0 0 0

CAP FAA 0 1,769,400 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 295,000 0 0 0

0 2,359,300 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT

AVIATION CAPACITY PROJECT

AIRFIELD/AIRSIDE/TERMINAL INFRASTRUCTURE REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DIS 0 5,400,000 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 5,400,000 0 0 0

0 10,800,000 0 0 0Total:

75




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT

AVIATION SECURITY PROJECT

ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM REPLACEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 3,032,200 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 3,032,200 0 0

0 0 6,064,400 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


LONG TERM PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING FIXTURES REPLACEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 73,688 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 937,500 0 0 0 0

1,011,188 0 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


LANDSIDE FACILITY INTERIOR LED SIGNAGE REPLACEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 2,028,800 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 2,028,800 0 0 0 0

4,057,600 0 0 0 0Total:

76




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


NORTH EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT PAVEMENT REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 31,200 0 0 0 0

CAP FAA 232,100 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 46,200 0 0 0 0

309,500 0 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


LANDSIDE TICKET LEVEL RESTROOM REFURBISHMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 251,500 0 0 0 0

CAP FAA 1,508,800 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 251,500 0 0 0 0

2,011,800 0 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


AIRSIDE E AIRLINE AND TSA SPACE REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 160,900 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 161,000 0 0 0 0

321,900 0 0 0 0Total:

77




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


AIRSIDE C PAGING SYSTEM AMPS AND MIXERS REPLACEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 80,400 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 80,500 0 0 0 0

160,900 0 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


AIRSIDE C PASSENGER BOARD BRIDGES REPAINTING

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 99,000 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 99,100 0 0 0 0

198,100 0 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


AIRSIDE A INT/EXT STAIRS, WALLS & DOORS REFURBISHMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 120,700 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 120,700 0 0 0 0

241,400 0 0 0 0Total:

78




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


AIRSIDE A FIRE SYSTEM UPGRADE

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 201,200 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 201,200 0 0 0 0

402,400 0 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


FBO (SIGNATURE) TAXIWAY/RAMP ASPHALT PAVEMENT REHAB

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 2,135,105 0 0 0 0

CAP DPTO 310,585 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 2,445,690 0 0 0 0

4,891,380 0 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


FBO (JET CENTER) RAMP AND APRON ASPHALT PAVEMENT REHAB

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 1,000,000 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 1,000,000 0 0 0 0

2,000,000 0 0 0 0Total:

79




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


STRUCTURAL AND PAVEMENT INSPECTION AND DESIGN

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 221,900 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 221,900 0 0 0

0 443,800 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


COMMON USE PASSENGER PROCESSING SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 823,000 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 823,000 0 0 0

0 1,646,000 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


AIRSIDE A ROOF REPAIR

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 114,000 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 1,124,500 0 0 0

0 1,238,500 0 0 0Total:

80




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


RAMP FOR CONCRETE JOINT AND SLAB REPLACEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 179,200 0 0 0

CAP FAA 0 1,084,000 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 179,200 0 0 0

0 1,442,400 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


AIRFIELD SLAB REPLACEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 262,500 0 0 0

CAP FAA 0 1,575,000 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 262,500 0 0 0

0 2,100,000 0 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


AIRSIDE E BAGGAGE SORT SYSTEM RECONFIGURATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 400 0 0 0

CAP DPTO 0 2,884,831 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 4,958,000 0 0 0

0 7,843,231 0 0 0Total:

81




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


TAXIWAY W (W1-W5) CONCRETE JOINT AND SLAB REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 175,200 0 0

CAP FAA 0 0 1,051,500 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 175,300 0 0

0 0 1,402,000 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


STRUCTURAL AND PAVEMENT REPAIRS

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 0 452 0 0

CAP DPTO 0 0 755,300 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 837,300 0 0

0 0 1,593,052 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


TAXIWAY W FROM W-1 TO W-5 ASPHALT PAVEMENT REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 303,700 0 0

CAP FAA 0 0 1,822,500 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 303,800 0 0

0 0 2,430,000 0 0Total:

82




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


AIRCRAFT RESCUE FIRE FIGHTING TRAINING FACILITY RELOCATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 263,400 0 0

CAP FAA 0 0 4,824,300 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 1,344,800 0 0

0 0 6,432,500 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


LONG TERM PARKING GARAGE LEVEL 2 REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 350,000 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 389,700 0 0

0 0 739,700 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


LONG TERM PARKING GARAGE LEVEL 1 REHABILTATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 350,000 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 389,700 0 0

0 0 739,700 0 0Total:

83




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


LONG TERM PARKING GARAGE BC LEVEL REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 420,548 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 428,300 0 0

0 0 848,848 0 0Total:


AIRPORT

AVIATION CAPACITY PROJECT

APRON IMPROVEMENTS AT NORTH TERMINAL

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DIS 0 0 5,000,000 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 5,000,000 0 0

0 0 10,000,000 0 0Total:


AIRPORT


RAP BLUE (US AIR) CONCRETE JOINT AND SLAP REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 330,000 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 330,000 0

0 0 0 660,000 0Total:

84




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


EMPLOYEE SURFACE PARKING EXPANSION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 0 0 802,700 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 2,820,600 0

0 0 0 3,623,300 0Total:


AIRPORT


RAMP FEDEX/EMORY AND TAXIWAY K CONCRETE JOINT AND SLAB

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 0 0 82,286 0

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 402,714 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 485,000 0

0 0 0 970,000 0Total:


AIRPORT


STRUCTURAL AND PAVEMENT INSPECTION AND DESIGN

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 234,000 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 234,100 0

0 0 0 468,100 0Total:

85




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


RAMP RED (DELTA) CONCRETE JOINT AND SLAB REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 350,000 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 350,000 0

0 0 0 700,000 0Total:


AIRPORT



FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 420,000 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 420,000 0

0 0 0 840,000 0Total:


AIRPORT



FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 434,000 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 435,600 0

0 0 0 869,600 0Total:

86




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


GEORGE BEAN PARKWAY AND BESSIE COLEMAN SERVICE ROAD

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 0 0 1,112,765 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 2,885,000 0

0 0 0 3,997,765 0Total:


AIRPORT


TAXIWAY T REALIGNMENT AND CORPORATE ROAD ASPHALT SERVICE

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 0 0 0 2,715,538

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 1,200,492

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 3,916,030

0 0 0 0 7,832,060Total:


AIRPORT


CARGO PARKING LOT REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 307,500

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 307,500

0 0 0 0 615,000Total:

87




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


AIRPORT


TAXIWAY B SHOULDER REHABILITATION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 95,500

CAP FAA 0 0 0 0 573,000

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 95,500

0 0 0 0 764,000Total:


AIRPORT


AIRFIELD SLAB REPLACEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 0 0 0 0 275,000

CAP FAA 0 0 0 0 1,650,000

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 275,000

0 0 0 0 2,200,000Total:

FLP: SEAPORTPORT OF TAMPA 4127461

SEAPORT CAPACITY PROJECT

INTERMODAL CARGO HANDLING

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

PLN DDR 0 0 1,316,385 0 0

0 0 1,316,385 0 0Total:

88




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

PORT OF TAMPA 4228262

CONTAINER YARD IMPROVEMENTS


GROWTH MANAGEMENT-2015 FACILITIES EXPANSION

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP GMR 10,400,000 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 10,400,000 0 0 0 0

20,800,000 0 0 0 0Total:



BIG BEND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DIS 0 0 5,000,000 0 0

CAP LF 0 0 1,250,000 0 0

0 0 6,250,000 0 0Total:


GANTRY CRANE REPLACEMENT AND ENHANCEMENT


FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP GMR 0 0 0 0 10,000,000

CAP LF 0 0 0 0 10,000,000

0 0 0 0 20,000,000Total:

89




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


HOOKERS POINT IMPROVEMENT


FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP LF 2,200,000 0 0 0 0

CAP PORT 2,200,000 0 0 0 0

4,400,000 0 0 0 0Total:

TAMPA PORT AUTHORITY 4330051


INTERMODAL IMPROVEMENTS

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 0 0 1,029,649 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 1,029,649 0

0 0 0 2,059,298 0Total:



EASTPORT BERT DEVELOPMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP GMR 0 0 0 5,000,000 0

CAP LF 0 0 0 5,000,000 0

0 0 0 10,000,000 0Total:

90




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013


PORT OF TAMPA


FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DPTO 1,463,486 0 0 0 0

CAP LF 487,828 0 0 0 0

1,951,314 0 0 0 0Total:


PORT OF TAMPA INTERMODAL CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS


FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP DDR 0 1,121,196 0 0 0

CAP DPTO 0 27,002 0 0 0

CAP LF 0 382,732 0 0 0

0 1,530,930 0 0 0Total:

FLP: TRANSITHART 4022511

BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM- OPERATING

OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE

OPERATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

OPS DDR 4,149,346 3,368,839 4,010,470 4,169,908 4,633,028

OPS DPTO 125,383 1,005,109 361,471 310,874 0

OPS LF 4,274,729 4,373,948 4,371,941 4,480,782 4,633,028

8,549,458 8,747,896 8,743,882 8,961,564 9,266,056Total:

91




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

HART 4081091

FTA SECTION 5307

CAPITAL FOR FIXED ROUTE

CAPITAL PLANNING

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP FTA 16,100,005 16,287,445 16,528,240 7,201,278 0

16,100,005 16,287,445 16,528,240 7,201,278 0Total:

HART 4106931

CORRIDOR PROGRAM 200X- OPERATING

URBAN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS

INTER-COUNTY SEVICE BETWEEN HILLSBOROUGH & PINELLAS

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

OPS DDR 0 172,100 172,100 0 0

OPS DPTO 172,100 0 0 172,100 183,508

172,100 172,100 172,100 172,100 183,508Total:

HART 4149632

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

PURCHASE VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT

BUS REPLACEMENTS

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP SU 5,000,000 0 8,200,000 7,150,000 6,220,000

5,000,000 0 8,200,000 7,150,000 6,220,000Total:

92




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

HART 4207411

CORRIDOR PROGRAM 51X-OPERATING


INTER-COUNTY SERVICE BETWEEN PASCO & HILLSBOROUGH OPERATING

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

OPS DDR 0 240,125 0 0 0

OPS DPTO 240,125 0 240,125 240,125 251,532

240,125 240,125 240,125 240,125 251,532Total:

HART 4303221

CORRIDOR PROGRAM 20X-OPERATING

TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT

INTER-COUNTY SERVICE BETWEEN PASCO & HILLSBOROUGH OPERATING

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

OPS DPTO 400,000 241,000 241,000 241,000 252,407

400,000 241,000 241,000 241,000 252,407Total:

HART 4351411

TAMPA STREETCAR CAPITAL MAINTENANCE

FIXED GUIDEWAY IMPROVEMENTS

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP SU 0 0 100,000 0 880,006

0 0 100,000 0 880,006Total:

93




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

HART 4352111

SERVICE DEVELOPMENT OPERATING ACTIVITIES


SERVICE DEVELOPMENT FOR ROUTE 60

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

OPS DPTO 440,000 0 0 0 0

440,000 0 0 0 0Total:

HILLSBOROUGH 4299251

RURAL MAP 21 ADA

TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT

MAP 21 ADA SERVICES; EXTENSIONS, EXPANSION, VOUCHERS TRANSIT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

OPS DU 0 0 108,373 285,132 0

OPS LF 0 0 108,373 285,132 0

0 0 216,746 570,264 0Total:

HILLSBOROUGH 4299261

NON URBAN MAP 21

OPERATING/ADMIN. ASSISTANCE

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING/MOBILITY EMPLOYMENT ACTIVITY

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

OPS DU 0 0 0 142,715 0

OPS LF 0 0 0 142,715 0

0 0 0 285,430 0Total:

94




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

HILLSBOROUGH CTY MPO 4022551

TRANSIT PLANNING SECTION 5305

PTO STUDIES

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

PLN DDR 0 36,564 36,564 33,915 38,734

PLN DPTO 36,561 0 0 0 0

PLN DU 292,979 292,980 292,980 299,283 309,875

PLN LF 37,006 37,006 37,006 33,915 38,734

366,546 366,550 366,550 367,113 387,343Total:

NEW NORTH 4240931

TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE (NNTA)

COMMUTER TRANS. ASSISTANCE

COMMUNITY 2GO! PILOT PROGRAM

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

OPS DDR 0 150,000 0 0 0

OPS DPTO 0 0 0 39,000 0

OPS LF 0 150,000 0 39,000 0

0 300,000 0 78,000 0Total:

NEW NORTH 4242121

TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE (NNTA)


COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP SU 195,000 0 0 0 0

195,000 0 0 0 0Total:

95




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

TAMPA DOWNTOWN 4242111

PARTNERSHIP


COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP SU 195,000 0 0 0 0

195,000 0 0 0 0Total:

TBARTA 4082052

TAMPA BAY AREA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY


TRAVEL DEMAND MGT/OUTREACH AND EDUCATION; COMMUTER SERVICES

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

OPS SU 230,000 0 0 0 350,000

230,000 0 0 0 350,000Total:

TBARTA 4301751

SERVICE TRANSPORTATION

PURCHASE VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT

CAPITAL / CURRENT VAN POOL / RIDESHARE/TELECOMMUTE

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

CAP SU 310,800 0 386,400 800,000 800,000

310,800 0 386,400 800,000 800,000Total:

96




HILLSBOROUGH

November 12, 2013

TRANSPORTATION MGMT 4125331

ORGANIZATION COORDIN GROUP


OPERATING ASSISTANCE

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

OPS DDR 320,000 0 430,000 0 0

OPS DPTO 0 0 0 430,000 469,000

320,000 0 430,000 430,000 469,000Total:

TRANSPORTATION PLANNINGHILLSBOROUGH COUNTY 2592841

MPO UPWP

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:

PLN PL 1,032,032 1,032,032 1,032,032 1,032,032 1,032,032

1,032,032 1,032,032 1,032,032 1,032,032 1,032,032Total:

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY 2592851

MPO SVC TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

PLANNING MODELS/DATA UPDATE

LRTP UPDATES AND DATA COLLECTIONS

FPN:

DESCRIPTION:PROJECT LENGTH: .000M

PLN SU 0 600,000 400,000 400,000 400,000

PLN SU 600,000 0 0 0 0

600,000 600,000 400,000 400,000 400,000Total:

159,721,584 156,754,226 147,729,004 128,151,589 154,670,070County Total:

97


Work Program Fund Codes as of 12/03/2012

ACBR Advance Construction (BRT) GRSC Growth Management for Small County Outreach ProgramACCM Advance Construction (CM) HP Federal Highway PlanningACEN Advance Construction (EBNH) HPP High Priority Projects, SAFETEA-LU EarmarkACIM Interstate Maintenance (AC/Regular) HRRR High Risk Rural RoadACNH Principle Arterial (AC/Regular) HSP Safety (Highway Safety Program)ACNP Advance Construction (NHPP) HSR High Speed Rail Corridor Section 1010ACSA Advance Construction (SA) IMAC Interstate Maintenance (AC/Regular)ACSB Advance Construction (SABR) IVH Intelligent Vehicle Highway SystemACSE Advance Construction (SE) LF Local FundsACSL Advance Construction (SL) LFF Local Fund - for Matching F/AACSN Advance Construction (SN) LFP Local Fund for ParticipatingACSU Advance Construction (SU) LFR Local Funds/ReimbursableACTA Advance Construction (TALT) LFRF Local Funds/Reimbursable Outside 5 yearsACTL Advance Construction (TALL) NCPD National Corridor Planning & DevelopmentACTN Advance Construction (TALN) NHAC Principle Arterial (AC/Regular)ACTU Advance Construction (TALU) NHPP IM, Brdg Repl, Natnl Hwy-MAP21BNIR Intrastate R/W & Bridge Bonds NHRE Nat Hwy Perform-ResurfacingBNDS Bond - State NSTP FTA EARMARK 2010BNBR Amendment 4 Bonds (Bridges) PKBD Turnpike Master Bond FundBRAC Bridge (AC/Regular) PKYI Turnpike ImprovementBRP State Bridge Replacement PL Metro Plan (85% FA; 15% other)BRRP State Bridge Repair and Rehabilitation PLHD Public Lands Highway DiscretionaryBRT Fed Bridge Repl – On System POED 2012 SB1998-Seaport InvestmentBRTZ BRT (AC/Regular) PORB Port Funds Returned From BondsCIGP County Incentive Grant Program PORT SeaportsCIGR CIGP for Growth Management RED Redistribution Any AreaCM Congestion Mitigation - AQ RHH Rail Highway Crossings - HazardDDR District Dedicated Revenue RHP Rail Highway Crossings - Protective DevicesDDRF District Dedicated Revenue Matching Funds S112 STP Earmarks - 2006DEM Environmental Mitigation S115 STP Earmarks - 2004DEMW Environmental Mitigation-Wetlands S117 STP Earmarks - 2005DI St. - S/W Inter/Intrastate Highway S129 STP Earmarks - 2008DIH State In-house Product Support SCED 2012 SB1998-Small Co OutreachDIRS Advance Acquistion of Intrastate Corridor SCOP Small County OutreachDIS Strategic Intermodal System SA STP, Any AreaDITS Statewide ITS SE STP, EnhancementDPTO State PTO SL STP, Areas<=200K PopulationDRA Rest Area's SN STP, Mandatory, Non-UrbanDS State Primary Highways and PTO SR2E Safe Routes - EitherDSB1 Skyway SR2N Safe Rts to School – Non-infrastrucDSB3 Pinellas Bayway SR2S Safe Routes - InfrastructureDSB6 Tampa-Hillsborough Expressway Authority SS Safety (Highway Safety Program)DSF State Primary Matching Funds ST10 STP EARMARK - 2010DU State Primary/Federal Reimbursement SU STP, Urban Area's >200K PopulationDWS Weigh Stations TALL Transportation Alts - <200KEB Equity Bonus TALN Transportation Alts - <5KEBNH Equity Bonus Supplementing NH TALT Transportation Alts - Any AreaFBD Ferryboat Discretionary TALU Transportation Alts - >200KF001 Federal Discretionary - US 19 TCSP Trans, Community & Systems PresentationF002 Corridors/Borders - US19 D7 TIMP Transportation Improvements, SAFETEA-LU EarmarkFAA Federal Aviation Administration TRIP Trans Regional Incentive ProgramFBD Ferryboat Discretionary XA Any AreaFTA Federal Transit Administration XL Areas <= 200k PopulationFTAT FHWA Transfer to FTA (non-bud) XU Areas > 200k Population

LRTP Rank

FPNLRTP Project Number

Project Limits Project DescriptionProject Sponsor

Project StatusStatus in FDOT 5‐

Year Tentative Work Program*

1 415489‐3 H1865 US HWY 301 FROM SR 674 TO BALM RDWiden 2 lanes to 6 lanes divided

County / FDOT Construction Programmed 2016

2 405492‐5 H300BRUCE B DOWNS BLVD FROM BEARSS AVE TO PALM SPRINGS

Widen 4 lanes to 8 lanes divided County Construction Programmed 2014

3 405492‐4 H310BRUCE B DOWNS BLVD FROM PEBBLE CREEK DR TO COUNTY LINE RD

Widen 4 lanes to 6 lanes divided County Construction Programmed 2017

Construction Advanced to 2015

4 255585‐1 H420ALEXANDER STREET EXTENSION FROM I‐4 TO KNIGHTS GRIFFIN RD

New 4 lane divided roadway FDOT Under Construction

5 420625‐1 H460CROSS CREEK BLVD FROM CORY LAKE ISLES TO MORRIS BRIDGE RD

Widen 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes Divided Tampa Construction Programmed 2014

6 257862‐3 H1550 SAM ALLEN RD FROM SR 39 TO PARK RDWiden 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided FDOT Construction Programmed 2018

9 408459‐3 H855 I‐75 FROM N OF BB DOWNS BLVD TO S OF SR 56Widen 4 lane to 6 lane freeway FDOT Under Construction

9 410909‐2 ITS90 I‐75 FROM FOWLER AVE TO I‐275 ITS Freeway Management FDOT Under Construction

9 408459‐2 H852I‐75 FROM S OF FOWLER AVE TO N OF BB DOWNS BLVD

Widen 4 lanes to 6 lane freeway FDOT Under Construction

10 258399‐2 H746 I‐275 FROM HIMES AVE TO HILLSBOROUGH RIVERWiden 6 lanes to 8 lane freeway FDOT Under Construction

10 258398‐5 H742I‐275 FROM SR 60 (MEMORIAL HWY) TO HIMES AVE

Widen 6 lanes to 8 lane freeway FDOT Under Construction

10 258398‐3 ITS70 I‐275 FROM HIMES AVE TO HILLSBOROUGH RIVER ITS Freeway Management FDOT Under Construction

12 255793‐1 H1890US HWY 301 FROM TAMPA BYPASS CANAL TO FOWLER AVE

Widen 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided FDOT Under Construction

13 413092‐2 ORB170BAYSHORE BLVD FROM ROME AVE TO BAY TO BAY BLVD ‐ PHASE II Re‐Stripe for Bike Lane Tampa Construction Programmed 2015


13 413092‐3 ORB170BAYSHORE BLVD FROM BAY TO BAY BLVD TO GANDY BLVD ‐ PHASE III Re‐Stripe for Bike Lane Tampa Construction Programmed 2018


14 413086‐1 ORT10 UPPER TAMPA BAY TRAIL PHASE IV Multi‐Use Trail County Phase IV‐C Funded for Construction

27 255893‐2 H1675 SR 574 FROM HIGHVIEW RD TO PARSONS AVEWiden 2 Lanes to 4 Lanes Divided FDOT Under Construction

27 255893‐3 H1680 SR 574 FROM PARSONS AVE TO KINGSWAYWiden 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided FDOT Construction Programmed 2016

28 255893‐4 H1690 SR 574 FROM KINGSWAY TO MCINTOSH RDWiden 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided FDOT Construction Programmed 2018

36 428214‐2 PEC290 FLETCHER AVE FROM I‐275 TO 56TH ST Pedestrian Enhancement County Under Construction

67 410909‐6 ITS85I‐75 FROM MANATEE COUNTY TO BLOOMINGDALE AVE ITS Freeway Management FDOT Construction Programmed 2014

Status of MPO Adopted Priorities in Tentative Work Program

EXISTING PRIORITIES FUNDED FOR CONSTRUCTION

Page 1 Printed: 12/4/2013

LRTP Rank



Project StatusStatus in FDOT 5‐

Year Tentative Work Program*


EXISTING PRIORITIES FUNDED FOR CONSTRUCTION

74 257805‐5 ORT275

HILLSBOROUGH RIVER GREENWAY KENNEDY RIVERWALK ‐ MACDILL PARK TO CURTIS HIXON PARK Multi‐Use Trail Tampa Construction Programmed 2014

74 257805‐6 ORT277

HILLSBOROUGH RIVER GREENWAY DOYLE CARLTON RIVERWALK ‐ STRAZ CENTER TO WATER WORKS PARK Multi‐Use Trail Tampa Awarded 2012 TIGER Grant

79 429077‐1 ORB520NEBRASKA AVE (or alt rte Fla) from FOWLER AVE to FLORIDA/NEBRASKA Re‐Stripe for Bike Lane FDOT Resurfacing programmed in 2015

81 432715‐1 ORB290 BOUGAINVILLEA AVE FROM 30TH ST TO 46TH ST Pedestrian / Bicycle Safety Tampa Construction Programmed 2017

88 406151‐1/ 40H1960VETERANS EXPWY FROM MEMORIAL HWY TO GUNN HWY

Widen to 6 lanes to 8 lane freeway FTE Under Construction

117 405525‐2 H1730 SR 60 FROM US HWY 301 TO FALKENBURG RDWiden 4 lanes to 6 lanes divided FDOT Construction Programmed 2017

136 416361‐2 H1000SELMON EXPRESSWAY FROM FLORIDA AVE TO 22ND ST

Widen 4 lanes to 6 lane freeway THEA Under Construction

153 424561‐5 ORT350WEST TAMPA GREENWAY / COURTNEY CAMPBELL CAUSEWAY Multi‐Use Trail FDOT Under Construction

281 257805‐7 ORT370SELMON GREENWAY TRAIL FROM HILLSBOROUGH RIVER TO 19TH ST Multi‐Use Trail THEA

Funded through 2012 TIGER Grant and FDOT resurfacing projects. Additional funding may be needed

258415‐1 H825I‐4 / SELMON EXPRESSWAY FROM SELMON EXPRESSWAY TO I‐4 New 6 lane freeway

FDOT / THEA Under Construction

413407‐2 ‐BUSCH BLVD FROM ARMENIA AVE TO FLORIDA AVE

Landscaping, Pedestrian Enhancement Tampa Construction Programmed 2014

432716‐1 ORB1 PALM AVE FROM N. BLVD TO NEBRASKA AVE Pedestrian / Bicycle Safety Tampa Construction Programmed 2018Construction Advanced to 2015

432717‐1 ORB1 WILLOW AVE FROM SWANN AVE TO MAIN ST Pedestrian / Bicycle Safety Tampa Construction Programmed 2017* ‐ only changes in project status are noted. Nothing has been notated for projects where the status remains unchanged Adopted 9/3/2013


2013 Priority

LRTP Rank



Project StatusCandidate for Transportation

Alternatives Funding

Status in FDOT 5‐Year Tentative Work

Program

1 MPO MPO PLANNING MODELS / DATA UPDATE

Corridor and Systems Planning

MPO Ongoing planning need ($400,000 per year)

Added in 2019

2432714‐1

ORB470CYPRESS CORRIDOR FROM U‐PATH TO WESTSHORE BLVD

Pedestrian / Bicycle Safety

Tampa $3.966 million needed for Construction.PE funded in 2013

Application Submitted June 2012

Construction Added in 2015

3* Policy 5.1BSAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL CANDIDATE PROJECTS FROM 2012**

Sidewalks and Intersection Improvements

County 20 projects totaling $3.8 million

Waiting for applications Applications currently under review

4 414963‐2 T30 MAINTAIN CURRENT BUS SERVICE Bus Replacement HART $3.22 million needed or 2019 ***

$6.6 million Added in 2018 and 2019

5 430175‐1 T28 MAINTAIN CURRENT VANPOOLS Vanpool Vehicles TBARTA Ongoing program ($800,000 per year)

Added in 2019

6 T23

MAINTAIN CURRENT STREETCAR Capital Maintenance

HART $100,000 needed for design / assessment phase; $880,006 needed for construction

Design Added 2017; Construction added 2019

7

ITS10DOWNTOWN ATMS PROJECT (South of Scott Street, East of Hillsborough River, West of Channelside Drive)

93 Signals Tampa $1,447,910 Design and $2,852,550 Construction estimate

ITS10KENNEDY/HYDE PARK ATMS PROJECT (Includes Bayshore, Kennedy, Hyde Park)

44 Signals Tampa $941,523 Deisgn and $1,849,500 Construction estimate

ITS10SOUTH TAMPA/DALE MABRY ATMS PROJECT (Includes South Dale Mabry, Gandy and Westshore)

78 Signals Tampa $1,245,576 Design and $2,517,750 Construction estimate

ITS10UNIVERSITY AREA/BUSCH BLVD ATMS PROJECT (Includes Busch Blvd and Fowler Ave)

40 Signals Tampa $729,606 Design and $1,383,750 Construction

8 ITS50 DALE MABRY HWY FROM SLIGH TO VAN DYKE RD

ATMS ‐ Signalization

County $2.8 Million for design and implementation

Estimate: $400,000

Estimate: $7,766,000

Estimate: $5,000,000

Estimate: $12,800,000FDOT is evaluating project descriptions

and funding availability


CITY OF TAMPA ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Priority for funding first $10,000,000

CANDIDATES FOR NEW FUNDING

Programmatic Set‐Aside: Intelligent Transportation System Program

Programmatic Set‐Aside: Transit System Preservation Program

Programmatic Set‐Aside: Planning

Programmatic Set‐Aside: Pedestrian / Bicycle Safety Program


2013 Priority

LRTP Rank






Program



9 9 H850I‐75 N OF I‐4 TO S OF FOWLER Add 4 Special Use

LanesFDOT Design and Toll Feasibility

funding needed

10 61 H820I‐4 FROM 50TH STREET TO COUNTY LINE ROAD

Add 4 Special Use Lanes

FDOT Design and Toll Feasibility funding needed

11* ‐ 433535‐4 ‐I‐275 FROM HOWARD FRANKLAND BRIDGE TO DOWNTOWN INTERCHANGE

Add 4 Special Use Lanes

FDOT Design and Toll Feasibility funding needed

Design Added 2019

12 62422904‐2 & 422904‐4

H810I‐275 HOWARD FRANKLAND BRIDGE EASTBOUND SPAN

Replacement & Support Transit

FDOT PD&E / Transit Feasibility Study Programmed 2011

Design‐Build Added in 2019

13 114 T3

FIXED GUIDEWAY FROM WESTSHORE TO TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Fixed Guideway Design Study needed for route alignment; Construction of first phase to terminal

14 187 412531‐2H1710, H744

I‐275 @ SR 60 INTERCHANGE Modify Interchange FDOT Multiple construciton projects with design or Right‐of‐Way

Right‐of‐Way added 2016‐2019

15 14 ORT10UPPER TAMPA BAY TRAIL PHASE IV‐A and IV‐B

Multi‐Use Trail County PD&E Study Re‐Evaluation / Design Needed

Eligible and Feasible

16 16 408205‐2 T25 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT

Public Outreach & Education

TBARTA Commuter Assistance Program

Funding Added in 2019

17 20 ORT140 SOUTH COAST GREENWAY (PHASES I and III‐VI)

Multi‐Use Trail County PD&E Study / Design Needed

18* 47 H1530 SAM ALLEN RD FROM PARK TO POLK COUNTY

New 4 Lane roadway

Plant City Funding needed for PD&E

19 74 ORT275 TAMPA RIVERWALK ‐ KENNEDY BOULEVARD

Elevator / Stairs Tampa Coordination underway with FDOT ‐ $1,015,844

Application anticipated next year

20 83 424507‐2 ITS20COURTNEY CAMPBELL CSWY FROM PINELLAS COUNTY TO VETERANS EXPY.

ITS FDOT Design Programmed 2017 Construction Added in 2019

21 103 H1670SR 39 / COLLINS STREET FROM PARK ROAD TO ALABAMA STREET

Complete Street Enhancements

Plant City Feasibility study underway ‐ funding needed for design

Resurfacing project added 2017

22 109 H360 CAUSEWAY BLVD FROM MARITIME BLVD TO US 41

Widen 4 lanes to 6 lanes divided

Submitted by Port

Other Major Projects

Major Regional Projects


2013 Priority

LRTP Rank






Program



23

T67 DALE MABRY / MACDILL BUS RAPID TRANSIT

New Expanded Transit Service

HART $3.5 million PD&E / Design

T69 BRANDON/DOWNTOWN BUS RAPID TRANSIT



T70 TAMPA INTERNATION AIRPORT / KENNEDY BLVD BUS RAPID TRANSIT



T71NEW TAMPA/ UNIVERSITY AREA TRANSFER CENTER BUS RAPID TRANSIT



24 157PEC640 & PEC230

CASS STREET / TYLER STREET "GREEN SPINE" ASHLEY ST TO NUCCIO PKWY

Walk Bike Emphasis Corridor

Tampa $300,000 requested for PD&E ($2,454,197 total cost estimate)

Application submitted 2013

25 337 ORT30SOUTH TAMPA GREENWAY FROM MANHATTAN AVE TO PICNIC ISLAND PARK

Multi‐Use Trail Tampa $50,000 requested for PD&E ($1,800,000 total cost estimate)


26* 461 H1620

SLIGH AVE BRIDGE FROM US 301 TO TAMPA EXECUTIVE AIRPORT

New 2 lane roadway

Submitted by Aviation Authority

Waiting for funding information

27WEST RIVER GREENWAY ‐ BAYSHORE BLVD TO MLKING RECREATION COMPLEX

Multi‐Use Trail Tampa $132,000 requested for Design ($982,000 total cost estimate)


28CHARLIE TAYLOR ROAD FROM US 92 TO KNIGHTS GRIFFIN ROAD

Enhancements ‐ turn lanes / intersections

Plant City PD&E / Design requested

29 SR 60 @ US 41 Grade Separated Intersection

Submitted by Port

30 US 41 FROM CAUSEWAY BLVD TO I‐4 Operational Improvements

Submitted by Port

31 US 41 FROM CSX 'A' LINE TO CSX 'S' LINE

Grade Separated Intersection

Submitted by Port

32 US 301 FROM I‐75 TO SELMON EXPRESSWAY

Operational Improvements

Submitted by Port

* ‐ Project not listed in the Cost‐Affordable Long Range Transportation Plan Adopted 9/3/2013** ‐ Federal program discontinued under MAP‐21*** ‐ HART has identified a $44.5 million need between FY 2015 and FY 2019 and requests additional funding prior to FY 2019 as if funds become available.

Future Project for LRTP consideration

Candidate corridors for HART BRT


Florida Department of Transportation District Seven

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE

The Florida Department of Transportation, District Seven, invites you to participate in the Five-Year Tentative Work Program Public Hearing for Fiscal Years July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2019. The Tentative Work Program covers the next five years of preliminary engineering, right-of-way acquisition, construction, and public transportation projects for Citrus, Hernando, Hillsborough, Pasco, and Pinellas counties and includes Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise projects in these counties. This hearing is being conducted pursuant to Chapter 120 and 339.135(4)(d), Florida Statutes. The hearing will be held: Monday, December 16, 2013, 1:30 pm – 3:30 pm The hearing is being conducted as a webinar, (GoToMeeting) which is a live presentation delivered over the internet. Registration is required prior to joining the webinar. Please visit the website below to register:

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/547245394 If you do not have access to a computer or the internet, remote viewing locations are provided at each of the following locations: Florida Dept. of Transportation, 11201 N. McKinley Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 Citrus County: Inverness Gov’t Building, 212 W. Main Street, Inverness, FL 34450 Hernando County: MPO Offices, 20 N. Main St, Brooksville, FL 34601 Hillsborough County: MPO Offices, 601 E. Kennedy Blvd., 18th Floor, Tampa, FL 33601 Pasco County: West Pasco Gov’t Center, 8731 Citizens Dr, New Port Richey, FL 34654 Pinellas County: MPO Offices, 310 Court Street, Clearwater, FL 33755 The department will receive verbal and written comments from organizations and the general public at each location. Written comments not received at the public hearing must be postmarked by December 26, 2013 to become part of the official public hearing record. Written comments may be mailed to: Debbie Hunt, Director of Transportation Development, Florida Department of Transportation, 11201 N. McKinley Drive, MS 7-100, Tampa, Florida 33612-6456

Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. Persons who require special accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act or persons who require translation services (free of charge) should contact Lori Marable, Public Involvement Coordinator, at (813) 975-6405 or (800) 226-7220 at least seven days prior to the hearing.

Approved: MG 10/30/13

Board & Committee Agenda Item

Agenda Item: Bruce B. Downs Peak Hour High Occupancy Vehicle Lane Feasibility Study

Presenter: Gena Torres, MPO

Summary: The MPO’s Congestion Management/Crash Mitigation Process (CM/CMP) Lane Operations Study focused on three lane-operational improvements: Reversible Lanes, HOV Lanes, and Off-Peak Parking Lanes. These strategies make sense when faced with limited funds, limited right-of-way, and heavy traffic congestion during morning and afternoon commute times. After an assessment of which local roads might be a good choice for further study, Bruce B. Downs Blvd. was the best candidate for further study for HOV Lanes because of the high peak direction flow, available lanes, access to large activity centers, employers, future level of service concern, and current construction. The MPO has completed of a study of High Occupancy Vehicle lanes on Bruce B. Downs and will share the findings.

Recommended Action:

Approve the Bruce B. Downs HOV Feasibility Study.

Prepared By:

Attachments:

Gena Torres

Copy of slide presentation.

Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization 601 E Kennedy Boulevard, 18th floor, Tampa, Florida, 33601 · 813-272-5940 · HillsboroughMPO.org

1

Feasibility Study of SharedHigh Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on

Bruce B Downs Boulevard:Interstate 75 & Bearss Avenue

Hillsborough CountyMetropolitan Planning Organization

ITS Committee MeetingNovember 14, 2013

Lane Operation Strategies StudyFeasibility Study Purpose and Scope Previous and Present Initiatives Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Existing and Future Traffic Conditions Project Simulation Results Comparison of Conditions Conclusions/Recommendations

Agenda

GOAL 1: Improve Reliability of Travel

GOAL 2: Shift Peak-Hour Trips to High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Modes

GOAL 3: Reduce Peak-Hour Impacts

Lane Operation Strategies Study

Congestion Management/Crash Mitigation ProcessPotential HOV Lane on Bruce B Downs Blvd: Congestion in future even after widening High peaks at rush hour Widening = opportunity to designate HOV lanes Carpooling indicators FDOT Managed Lanes on I-75 (connecting)

HART MetroRapid to USF (connecting)

TBARTA Rail/BRT on Bruce B Downs Blvd

Lane Operation Strategies Study

Conduct Feasibility Study of Bruce B Downs Blvd HOV lane from I-75 to USF

2

Evaluate dedication of one shared HOV lane in the peak hour & peak direction

Feasibility Study

Purpose

Reviewed previous & present initiativesAssessed TDM support factors & initiativesConducted existing & future traffic analysisPerformed coordination/outreach

Scope

Feasibility Study

Previous and Present InitiativesCongestion Management/Crash Mitigation

Process Lane Operation Strategies StudyTransportation Research Board ReportsUSF to Wesley Chapel Regional Transit

Corridor Study

Feasibility Study

Transportation Demand Management2010 US Census Bureau Journey to Work DataCase Studies: I-880 HOT/HOV Value Pricing Feasibility Study [Florida]

HOV/HOT Lane Feasibility Study Final Report [South Carolina]

I-77 HOV Newsletter (marketing/PR/outreach/communications) [North Carolina]

I-95 HOV Feasibility Study [Virginia]

Regional HOT Lanes Network Feasibility Study [California]

Findings of Case Studies: HOV/HOT lanes successful if provide time & cost savings HOV lanes should carry 400-800 vph during peak periods

Feasibility Study

Transportation Demand ManagementStakeholder interviews – moderate

participation in TDM programsTBARTA & New North Transportation Alliance

are active in areaFunding constraints – limited TDM outreach

program development or implementation[on-site ride matching, etc.]

3

Feasibility Study

Transportation Demand ManagementAnnualCosts

(Salary)

PotentialEmployee

Reach(Low End)

WorksiteParticipants

EstimatedCommuterMode Shift(Low End)

PotentialEmployee

Reach(High End)

WorksiteParticipants

EstimatedCommuterMode Shift(High End)

Coordinator 1 $80,500 5,000 500 (10%) 130 (26%) 50,000 5,000 (10%) 1,300 (26%)

Coordinator 2 $80,500 5,000 500 (10%) 130 (26%) 50,000 5,000 (10%) 1,300 (26%)

Coordinator 3 $80,500 5,000 500 (10%) 130 (26%) 50,000 5,000 (10%) 1,300 (26%)

Coordinator 4 $80,500 5,000 500 (10%) 130 (26%) 50,000 5,000 (10%) 1,300 (26%)

Cost/Outcomes $322,000 20,000 2,000 520 200,000 20,000 5,200

Cost Per TripReduced $619.00 $61.90

Findings: Growth in # of commuters served More trips eliminated Cost-savings accruing to commuters

Feasibility Study

Lane Configuration Fletcher Ave to Bearss Ave: 6LD Bearss Ave to Palm Springs Blvd: 4LD Palm Springs Blvd to Commerce Palms Dr: 8LD

Speed Limit: 45 mphVehicle Occupancy Rate: AM = 1.15 PM = 1.21

Traffic: Existing Conditions

Existing Traffic Volumes Feasibility Study

No HOV Alternative: One additional through lane per direction NO designated HOV lane

HOV Alternative: One additional through lane per direction One designated HOV lane next to median

Free-flow eastbound to southbound right turn lane at Bearss Ave

Assumed 5% increase of HOV participation from current levels

Traffic: Future Conditions

4

2035 Traffic Volumes

AADT 108,000

AADT 87,900

Feasibility Study

Project Simulation Results

PM Peak (Northbound)PM Peak (Northbound)

AM Peak (Southbound)AM Peak (Southbound)

Seg. No. From To

1 S. of Fletcher Ave. Fletcher Ave.

2 Fletcher Ave. 138th Ave.

3 138th Ave. Bearss Ave.

4 Bearss Ave. Lake Forest Dr.

5 Lake Forest Dr. Skipper Rd.

6 Skipper Rd. 42nd St.

7 42nd St. Gilligan's Way

8 Gilligan's Way Amberly Dr.

9 Amberly Dr. Tampa Palms Blvd.(S)

10 Tampa Palms Blvd.(S) Methodist Pl

11 Methodist Pl Cypress Preserve Dr.

12 Cypress Preserve Dr. Tampa Palms Blvd.(N)

13 Tampa Palms Blvd.(N) Commerce Palms Dr.

14 Commerce Palms Dr. I-75

15 I-75 Commerce Palms Dr

16 Commerce Palms Dr Tampa Palms Blvd(N)

17 Tampa Palms Blvd(N) Cypress Preserve Dr.

18 Cypress Preserve Dr. Methodist Pl

19 Methodist Pl Tampa Palms Blvd.

20 Tampa Palms Blvd. Amberly Dr.

21 Amberly Dr. Gilligan's Way

22 Gilligan's Way 42nd St.

23 42nd St. Skipper Rd.

24 Skipper Rd. Lake Forest Dr.

25 Lake Forest Dr. Bearss Ave.

26 Bearss Ave. 138th Ave.

27 138th Ave. Fletcher Ave.

28 Fletcher Ave. S. of Fletcher Ave.

Comparison of Conditions: Speed

Feasibility Study

AM Southbound SOV will increase by 0.3 minutes HOV will decrease by 1.6 minutes

PM Northbound SOV will increase by 0.3 minutes HOV will decrease by 0.9 minutes

Feasibility Study

Comparison* of Conditions: Travel Time Savings

* Comparison with Non-HOV alternative

5

HOV lane not feasible as an outside lane due to multiple access points

Project provides moderate time savings for HOV trips

Higher time savings not possible due to multiple access points & intersections

Feasibility Study

Conclusions/Recommendations

Questions?Contact:

Gena TorresHillsborough County

Metropolitan Planning [email protected]

813.273.3774 ext. 357

Domingo Noriega, P.E.URS Corporation

[email protected]

813.636.2475


Agenda Item: Tri County Access Plan Update Presenter: Michele Ogilvie, MPO Staff Summary: The Tri County Access Plan identifies the regional mobility

needs of the transportation disadvantaged community in Pasco, Pinellas and Hillsborough Counties. In past years, these needs provided the guidance for mobility projects that may be considered for funding under New Freedom and Job Access Reverse Commute. MAP-21 has changed these funding sources, but not the needs.

MPO staff members of the Pinellas, Hillsborough and Pasco County MPOs have been working with Tindale Oliver and Associates, Inc. to update the regional mobility needs of the transportation disadvantaged community in the Tampa Bay Transportation Management Area (TMA). The results of this effort will be incorporated in the Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plans (TDSPs) of the three counties. During the week of November 4-8, public workshops were held in each of the TMA counties to gather input from the transportation disadvantaged community. The Pinellas County workshop was held on November 7 at PSTA. A representative of Tindale Oliver and Associates will provide an overview of this effort as well as the results of the workshops and other outreach activity at the meeting.

Recommended Action:

None, for information and discussion.

Prepared By: Attachments:

Michele Ogilvie None



Agenda Item: Imagine 2040 Survey Results & Hybrid Scenario

Presenter: Steve Griffin, Planning Commission Staff

Summary: The Imagine 2040 outreach campaign concluded on November 11, 2013. Over 3,500 people weighed in on long-range strategies for growth, development, and transportation over the outreach period. Some of the key results are:

- Over 1,600 participants ranked traffic congestion, job creation, and available bus or rail as top priorities for planning to 2040.

- The “Bustling Metro” scenario got the most 4 and 5 star ratings. “New Corporate Centers” received the second most 4 and 5 star ratings, followed by “Suburban Dream.”

- All of the transportation choices received overall positive ratings, with the highest ratings being for smart traffic signals and better intersections; sidewalks, bike lands and trails; and commuter or light rail.

- The highest levels of support for job locations were in existing job centers, redevelopment in existing industrial parks, and town centers with a mix of places to work.

- Most housing options were positively received with the lowest rankings for new homes in the rural area, either on large lots or in cluster subdivisions.

Staff is working on a thorough analysis of the input, including results by geographic areas of the county.

The goal is to utilize this input to create a “hybrid” vision scenario that will guide the updates of the four Comprehensive Plans and the MPO’s Long Range Transportation Plan.

A public meeting of the Imagine 2040 Working Group is scheduled for Thursday, December 12 at 5pm at


Hillsborough County Center, 26th Floor. This meeting will provide an open forum for discussion of the survey results and the survey’s implications for the plan updates.

Today’s presentation will focus on the transportation components of Imagine 2040 and the next steps in the development of the Long Range Transportation Plan.

Recommended Action:

None; for information and discussion

Prepared By:

Attachments:

Beth Alden, MPO Staff

Top-line summary of Imagine 2040 responses

Imagine 2040 – Final Data – All Survey Data

1

3%

26%

2%

54%

15%

Activities

Business/Property Owner

Live

Play/Visit

Some Combo of Above

Work/School

8%

92%

Voter Status

Non-Voter

Voter


2

11%

10%

10%

69%

Work Status

Retired or Unemployed

Student

Work from Home

Work Outside of Home

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

Agriculture/Farming

Infrastructure Cost

Efficient Water Use

Shorter Commutes

Access to Jobs

Water Quality

Redevelopment Potential

Efficient Energy Use

Natural Resources

Available Bus or Rail

Job Creation

Traffic Congestion

Priorities


3

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Suburban Dream

New Corporate Centers

Bustling Metro

Scenario

5 Stars

4 Stars

3 Stars

2 Stars

1 Stars

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Suburban Dream

New Corporate Centers

Bustling Metro

Scenario

4 & 5 Stars

3 Stars

1 & 2 Stars


4

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Town centers with a mix of places to liveincluding townhomes & apartments

High density residential in job centers likeDowntown, Westshore, & USF

Redevelopment of commercial corridors withapartments & townhomes

Single family homes filling in existingsurburban & urban areas

New homes in the rural area in clustersubdivions

New homes in the rural area on large lots

Homes

5 Stars

4 Stars

3 Stars

2 Stars

1 Stars

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

Town centers with a mix of places to liveincluding townhomes & apartments

High density residential in job centers likeDowntown, Westshore, & USF

Redevelopment of commercial corridorswith apartments & townhomes

Single family homes filling in existingsurburban & urban areas

New homes in the rural area in clustersubdivions

New homes in the rural area on large lots

Homes

4 & 5 Stars

3 Stars

1 & 2 Stars


5

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

New distribution centers along interstates

In town centers with a mix of places to worklike retail & office space

Creating new office parks along interstates likeI-4 & I-75

Redevelopment & filling in existing corporateparks & industrial areas

In existing job centers like the USF area,Westshore, & Downtown

Jobs

5 Stars

4 Stars

3 Stars

2 Stars

1 Stars

0 200 400 600 800 10001200140016001800

New distribution centers along interstates

In town centers with a mix of places to worklike retail & office space

Creating new office parks along interstateslike I-4 & I-75

Redevelopment & filling in existingcorporate parks & industrial areas

In existing job centers like the USF area,Westshore, & Downtown

Jobs

4 & 5 Stars

3 Stars

1 & 2 Stars


6

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

Express or BRT

Commuter or Light Rail

Smaller circulator buses & shuttles servingneighborhoods & business districts

Sidewalks, bike lanes, & trail

Smart traffic signals & better intersections

New Express Toll Lanes

Transportation

5 Stars

4 Stars

3 Stars

2 Stars

1 Stars

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Express or BRT

Commuter or Light Rail

Smaller circulator buses & shuttles servingneighborhoods & business districts

Sidewalks, bike lanes, & trail

Smart traffic signals & better intersections

New Express Toll Lanes

Transportation

4 & 5 Stars

3 Stars

1 & 2 Stars


7

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Utility Tax

Tolls on new lanes

Sales Tax

Property Tax

No new taxes/ maintain what we have

Gas Tax

One-time on new development

Special Assessment Districts

Funding

5 Stars

4 Stars

3 Stars

2 Stars

1 Stars

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Utility Tax

Tolls on new lanes

Sales Tax

Property Tax

No new taxes/ maintain what we have

Gas Tax

One-time on new development

Special Assessment Districts

Funding

4 & 5 Stars

3 Stars

1 & 2 Stars


Agenda Item: Downtown Transit Assets and Opportunities Study

Presenter: Rich Clarendon, MPO staff

Summary: The purpose of this study is to identify potential opportunities for expansion and/or extension of the existing transit assets focused on downtown Tampa including but not limited to expansion and/or extension of current rail and rubber wheeled systems, use of existing freight rail corridors, integration with existing rubber-wheeled systems, and other technologies using the existing TECO Streetcar system as its core. This study has the following goals and objectives:

1. To create a viable, regional transit network making use of the existing streetcar infrastructure.

a. Identify projects that can be advanced to the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan that expand and/or enhance the existing streetcar System.

b. Identify projects that can be advanced to the 2014 HART TDP that expand and/or enhance the existing streetcar System.

c. Coordinate with stakeholders to assist in the identification and prioritization of these projects.

2. To maximize utilization of existing transit assets to expand the service markets of the streetcar and associated transit assets.

a. Identify opportunities to utilize existing rail corridors.

b. Identify opportunities to enhance rail and rubber wheeled transit services via effective integration of technologies.

c. Identify rail technologies that maximize flexibility of use on both existing freight rail and existing streetcar lines.

3. To create revenue opportunities for the streetcar system.

Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization 601 E Kennedy Boulevard, 18th floor, Tampa, Florida, 33601 · 813-272-5940 www.planhillsborough.org

a. Identify locations for direct transit oriented development and /or redevelopment, public-private partnerships or joint development opportunities.

b. Identify opportunities for reducing liability associated with use of the existing freight rail corridor.

The study will recommend near-, mid- and long-term scenarios related to the expansion and/or extension of the identified transit assets.

Recommended Action:

None; for information only

Prepared By:

Attachments:

Rich Clarendon, AICP

None

FLORIDA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ADVISORY COUNCIL

2014 LEGISLATIVE POLICY POSITIONS

Priority Policy Positions

The MPOAC supports State Legislation that:

1. Implements the recommendations from the MPOAC transportation revenue study. In 2012, the MPOAC completed a two-year study to address the ever widening gap between the cost

of needed transportation infrastructure along with declining and unsustainable revenue sources. The study identified a $74 billion funding short fall in MPO areas over the next 20 years. It also proposed 14 policy recommendations that are intended to restore the purchasing power of Florida’s transportation dollar to the year 2000 and to move Florida toward a Mileage Based User Fee in lieu of the traditional fuel tax.

Key Recommendations:

Redirect the additional motor vehicle tag and title fees that were enacted by the 2009 Legislature and used for general revenue purposes to the State Transportation Trust Fund.

Expand the Charter County and Regional Transportation System Surtax to allow municipalities over 150,000 in population (or the largest municipality in a county) and all counties located in MPO areas to enact up to a one cent local option surtax by referendum.

Index local option fuel taxes to the consumer price index in a manner similar to the current indexing of state fuel taxes.

Direct the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to develop a plan to move Florida toward a Mileage Based User Fee in lieu of the traditional fuel tax which does not rely on GPS technology as a tracking device.

2. Restores funding for the Transportation Regional Incentive Program in order to promote regional

planning and project development.

The purpose of the Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) is to encourage regional planning by providing state matching funds (up to 50% of total project costs) for improvements to regionally significant transportation facilities identified and prioritized by regional partners. TRIP is funded through documentary stamp tax proceeds which have declined substantially over the past several years as a result of the economic decline in Florida’s housing and land development industry. Starting on July 1, 2014, funds available for TRIP will be further reduced as the first $60 million of the funds that would otherwise be allocated to TRIP will instead be allocated to the Florida Rail Enterprise.

3. Allows Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) funds to be used on roads and other transportation facilities not designated on the SIS if the improvement will enhance mobility or support freight transportation on the SIS.

Current state law does not permit SIS funds to be spent on roads or other transportation facilities that

are not part of the SIS, even if proposed improvements would directly benefit users of SIS facilities

by enhancing mobility options or supporting freight movement in a SIS corridor. This legislative proposal would broaden the State’s ability to improve passenger and freight mobility on SIS corridors by making eligible the expenditure of SIS funds on non SIS roads and other transportation facilities where the benefit to users of SIS facilities can be demonstrated.

4. Allows funds from the State Transportation Trust Funds (STTF) to be used for capital expenses associated with the development of multi-use regional trails.

There has been increasing interest over the past several years to increase regional mobility through

improved connections of multi-use trails. One example is the Coast-to-Coast Connector project which would result in a continuous multi-use trail that would extend from Brevard County on the Atlantic Coast to Pinellas County on the Gulf Coast. Once completed, the 275 mile multi-use trail system will draw thousands of tourists and spark new businesses in communities along the route. However, current state law does not specifically provide for the expenditure of funds from the State Transportation Trust Fund (STTF) to build or improve regional multi-use trails.

Additional Policy Positions

The MPOAC supports State Legislation that:

5. Reduces distracted driving by regulating as a primary offense the use of electronic wireless communications devices and other similar distracting devices while operating a moving motor vehicle. The 2013 Florida legislature enacted the “Florida Ban on Texting While Driving Law.” The law

prohibits operation of a moving motor vehicle while manually typing, sending or reading interpersonal communication (texting, e-mailing, instant messaging, etc.) using a wireless communications device, with certain exceptions. The law provides for enforcement of the ban as a secondary offense, meaning a driver would have to be pulled over for some other violation to get a ticket for violating the ban on texting. This legislative proposal would seek to strengthen the enforcement mechanism for the texting while driving ban by making it a primary offense.

6. Removes the cap on the number of board members who can serve on an MPO.

Federal law provides general guidance relative to the board membership of Metropolitan Planning

Organizations (MPOs). In contrast, Florida law includes extensive provisions on the voting membership of MPO boards. For example, state law authorizes no more than 19 voting members on an MPO, even in cases where an MPO boundary expands to include a new urbanized area or when two or more existing MPOs consolidate.

7. Promotes interoperable and multi-modal fare-payment technologies that must be compatible, universal

and accessible for use by all other technology systems.

Ideally, Florida’s citizens would be able to use a single fare-payment technology to drive on a toll road, ride a transit vehicle, park a car, cross a toll bridge or use any other transportation facility or service anywhere in the state, regardless of the owner or operator of the system. However, a variety of technological and institutional barriers stand in the way of implementing universal, multi-modal fare-payment technologies. This proposal would provide support for a wide range of legislative initiatives intended to remove those barriers.

8. Encourages the growth of carsharing services in the state of Florida by exempting carsharing program vehicles from the rental car surcharge.

A mode of transportation growing in popularity across the country is “carsharing,” which provides

mobility similar to personal vehicle ownership. A simple definition of carsharing is that it is a service that provides members with short‐term car rental and access to a fleet of vehicles on an hourly basis. In this way individuals gain the benefits of private cars, but without the fixed costs and responsibilities of ownership. Hourly carsharing costs are typically under $10 per hour. Currently, all rental cars in Florida are subject to a rental car surcharge of $2.00 per day, including carsharing vehicles being used for as little as a single hour. When considered on a percentage basis, that is a surcharge of 20 percent or more, an amount that has the potential to negatively impact the growth of carsharing services.

MPOAC Draft Legislation – November 21, 2013

1

(3) VOTING MEMBERSHIP.‐

(a) The voting membership of an M.P.O. shall consist of not fewer than 5 or more than 19 25 apportioned members, the exact number to be determined on an equitable geographic‐population ratio basis by the Governor, based on an agreement among the affected units of general‐purpose local government and the Governor as required by federal rules and regulations. The Governor, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. s. 134, may also provide for M.P.O members who represent municipalities to alternate with representatives from other municipalities within the metropolitan area that do not have members on the M.P.O. Except as provided elsewhere within this section, County Commission members shall compose no less than one‐third of the M.P.O. governing board membership. With regard to multi‐county M.P.O.s, the requirement of having one‐third of the M.P.O. board constituting county commissioners may be satisfied by any combination of different numbers of county commissioners from any of the counties constituting the M.P.O. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except for an M.P.O. with more than 15 members located in a county with a 5 member county commission or an M.P.O. with 19 members located in a county with no more than 6 county commissioners, in which case county commission members may compose less than one‐third percent of the M.P.O. governing board membership, when but all of the county commissioners in a single county M.P.O. are must be members of the M.P.O. governing board. All voting members shall be elected officials of general‐purpose local governments, one of whom may represent a group of general‐purpose local governments though an entity created by an M.P.O. for that purpose. ,except that an An M.P.O. may include, as part of its apportioned voting members, a member of a statutorily authorized planning board, an official of an agency that operates or administers a major mode of transportation, or an official of Space Florida. As used in this section, term, “elected officials of a general‐purpose local government” excludes shall exclude constitutional officers, including sheriffs, tax collectors, supervisors of elections, property appraisers, clerks of the court, and similar types of officials. County commissioners shall compose not less than 20 percent of the M.P.O. membership if an agency that operates or administers a major mode of transportation has been appointed to an M.P.O.

(b) In metropolitan areas in which authorities or other agencies have been or may be created by law to perform transportation functions and are performing transportation functions that are not under the jurisdiction of a general‐purpose local government represented on the M.P.O., they shall may be provided voting membership on the M.P.O. In all other M.P.O.s where transportation authorities or agencies are to be represented by elected officials from general‐purpose local governments, the M.P.O. shall establish a process by which the collective interests of such authorities or other agencies are expressed and conveyed.

(4) Apportionment.‐

(a) Each metropolitan planning organization shall review the composition of its membership in conjunction with the decennial census, as prepared by the United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, and, with the agreement of the affected units of general‐purpose local


2

government constituting the existing M.P.O. and the Governor, reapportion the membership as necessary to comply with subsection (3) The Governor shall, with the agreement of the affected units of general purpose local government as required by federal rules and regulations, apportion the membership on the applicable M.P.O. among the various governmental entities within the area. At the request of a majority of the affected units of general‐purpose local government serving on the M.P.O., the Governor and a majority of units of general‐purpose local government serving on an M.P.O. shall cooperatively agree upon and prescribe who may serve as an alternate member and prescribe a method for appointing alternate members who may vote at any M.P.O. meeting that an alternate member attends in place of a regular member. The method must shall be set forth as part of the interlocal agreement describing the M.P.O.’s membership or in the M.P.O.’s operating procedures and bylaws. The government entity so designated shall appoint the appropriate number of members to the M.P.O. from eligible officials. Representatives of the department shall serve as nonvoting advisors to M.P.O. governing board. Additional nonvoting advisors may be appointed to the M.P.O. as deemed necessary; however, to the maximum extent feasible, each M.P.O. shall seek to appoint non‐voting representatives of various multimodal forms of transportation not otherwise represented by voting members of the M.P.O. An M.P.O. shall appoint nonvoting advisors representing major military installations located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the M.P.O. upon the request of aforesaid major military installations and subject to the agreement of the M.P.O. All nonvoting advisors may attend and participate fully in governing board meetings but shall not have a vote and shall not be members of the governing board. The Governor shall review the composition of the M.P.O. membership in conjunction with the decennial census as prepared by the United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, and reapportion it as necessary to comply with subsection (3).

(11) METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ADVISORY COUNCIL.‐

(c) The powers and duties of the Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council are to:

1. Enter into contracts with individuals, private corporations, and public agencies.

2. Acquire, own, operate, maintain, sell, or lease personal property essential for the conduct of business.

3. Accept funds, grants, assistance, gifts, or bequests from private, local, state, or federal sources.

4. Establish bylaws by action of its governing board providing procedural rules to guide its proceedings and consideration of matters before the Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council, or, alternatively, and adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement provisions of law conferring powers or duties upon it.

5. Assist M.P.O.’s in carrying out the urbanized area transportation planning process by serving as the principal forum for collective policy discussion pursuant to law.

6. Serve as a clearinghouse for review and comment by M.P.O.’s on the Florida Transportation Plan and on other issues required to comply with federal or state law in carrying out the urbanized area transportation and systematic planning processes instituted pursuant to s.339.155.


3

7. Employ an executive director and such other staff as necessary to perform adequately the functions of the council, within budgetary limitations. The executive director and staff are exempt from part II of

Chapter 100 and serve at the discretion and control of the council. The council is assigned to the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Transportation for fiscal and accountability purposes, but it shall otherwise function independently of the control and direction of the department.

8. Adopt an agency strategic plan that provides the priority directions the agency will take to carry out its mission within the context the state comprehensive plan and any other statutory mandates and directions given to the agency.

Documents

Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization...race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the