of 37 /37
Higher-Order XFEM for Arbitrary Weak Discontinuities Kwok-Wah Cheng and Thomas-Peter Fries RWTH Aachen University, Germany Columbus, Ohio July 17, 2009

Higher-Order XFEM for Arbitrary Weak Discontinuities · Motivation 7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 3 High-order XFEM: what has already been done? Higher-order convergence

  • Author
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Text of Higher-Order XFEM for Arbitrary Weak Discontinuities · Motivation 7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng,...

  • Higher-Order XFEM for

    Arbitrary Weak Discontinuities

    Kwok-Wah Cheng and Thomas-Peter Fries

    RWTH Aachen University, Germany

    Columbus, Ohio

    July 17, 2009

  • � Motivation

    � Interpolation of interface

    � Sub-cell integration

    � Higher-order XFEM formulations

    � Standard XFEM

    � Modified abs-enrichment (Möes et. al., 2003)

    � Corrected XFEM (Fries, 2007)

    � Numerical results

    � Conclusion

    7/14/2009

    K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM

    2

    Contents

  • Motivation

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 3

    � High-order XFEM: what has already been done?

    � Higher-order convergence rates for strong and weak, straight

    discontinuities in 2-D have been achieved by previous workers (e.g.

    Laborde et. al., 2005; Legay et. al., 2006).

    � Higher-order convergence rates for strong, curved discontinuities in

    2-D have been achieved (e.g. Dréau et. al., 2008).

    � This study considers higher-order XFEM for weak, curved

    discontinuities in 2-D. Both quadratic and cubic

    approximations will be investigated.

  • �Motivation

    � Interpolation of interface

    � Sub-cell integration

    � Higher-order XFEM formulations

    � Standard XFEM

    � Modified abs-enrichment (Möes et. al., 2003)

    � Corrected XFEM (Fries, 2007)

    � Numerical results

    � Conclusion

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 4

    Contents

  • Interpolation of interface

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 5

    The position of the interface is defined by the level-set method:

    � The level-set function is a signed distance function

    which stores the shortest distance to the discontinuity.

    � The zero-level of the level-set function is the discontinuity.

    discontinuity

    1D 2D

  • Interpolation of interface

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 6

    � Interpolation using finite element shape functions.

    Bilinear Quadratic Cubic

    -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4

    -0.4

    -0.3

    -0.2

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4

    -0.4

    -0.3

    -0.2

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4

    -0.4

    -0.3

    -0.2

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

  • �Motivation

    � Interpolation of interface

    � Sub-cell integration

    � Higher-order XFEM formulations

    � Standard XFEM

    � Modified abs-enrichment (Möes et. al., 2003)

    � Corrected XFEM (Fries, 2007)

    � Numerical results

    � Conclusion

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 7

    Contents

  • Sub-cell integration

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 8

    � In the XFEM, integration of element matrices needs to take into account different material properties across interfaces.

    -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    Material A

    Material B

    Interface

  • Sub-cell integration

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 9

    -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    � Projection of integration points

  • Sub-cell integration

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 10

    � Projection of integration points

    -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    Triangular sub-cells

    Quadrilateral sub-cell

    Always end up with triangular and quadrilateral sub-cellswith at most one curved side.

  • Sub-cell integration

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 11

    � Projection of integration pointsReference

    elements

    -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

  • Sub-cell integration

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 12

    � Projection of integration pointsReference

    elements

    -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

  • Sub-cell integration

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 13

    � Objective: Locate the 4 points on the interface

    Exact interfaceBilinear interpolation

    interpolated interface

  • -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    Sub-cell integration

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 14

    Reference

    elements

    � Projection of integration points

  • �Motivation

    � Interpolation of interface

    � Sub-cell integration

    � Higher-order XFEM formulations

    � Standard XFEM

    � Modified abs-enrichment (Möes et. al., 2003)

    � Corrected XFEM (Fries, 2007)

    � Numerical results

    � Conclusion

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 15

    Contents

  • Standard XFEM formulation

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 16

    � Standard XFEM approximation:

  • Standard XFEM formulation

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 17

    � Standard XFEM approximation:

    � For weak discontinuities

  • Problems in blending elements

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 18

    � Using the standard XFEM formulation with the abs-enrichment leads to problems in blending elements (e.g. Sukumar et. al., 2001; Chessa et. al., 2003).

    � Remedies for such problems� Modified abs-enrichment (Möes et. al., 2003)

    � Corrected XFEM (Fries, 2007)

  • Problems in blending elements

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 19

    � Partition-of-unity functions do not build a partition-of-unity over the blending elements

  • Problems in blending elements

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 20

    � Introduces unwanted parasitic terms into the approximation space of the blending elements.

    � Degrades both accuracy and convergence rates.

    � Affects the abs-enrichment

  • Modified abs-enrichment

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 21

    � Modified abs-enrichment (Möes et. al., 2003)

  • Modified abs-enrichment

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 22

    � Modified abs-enrichment (Möes et. al., 2003)

  • Modified abs-enrichment

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 23

    � Modified abs-enrichment (Möes et. al., 2003)

  • Modified abs-enrichment

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 24

    � Modified abs-enrichment (Möes et. al., 2003)

  • Corrected XFEM formulation

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 25

    � Corrected XFEM (Fries, 2008)

  • Corrected XFEM formulation

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 26

    � Corrected XFEM (Fries, 2008)

    J*

    J*

  • �Motivation

    � Interpolation of interface

    � Sub-cell integration

    �Higher-order XFEM formulations

    � Standard XFEM

    �Modified abs-enrichment (Möes et. al., 2003)

    �Corrected XFEM (Fries, 2007)

    � Numerical results

    � Conclusion

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 27

    Contents

  • Numerical results

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 28

    � Bi-material with a circular inclusion (Sukumar et. al., 2001; Legay et. al., 2005; Fries, 2008)

    Material 1Material 2

    Plane-strain conditions

    25.0,1

    3.0,10

    22

    11

    ==

    ==

    vE

    vE

    Computational Domain

    Material Properties

    Loading results from constant radial displacement

  • Numerical results

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 29

    � Computational domain

    -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-1

    -0.8

    -0.6

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    Reproducing elements

    Blending elements

  • Numerical results

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 30

    � Computational domain

    Reproducing elements

    Blending elements

    -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-1

    -0.8

    -0.6

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    U = 0

    U = 0

    v = 0 v = 0

    Dirichlet boundary conditions

    0)0,1(

    0)1,0(

    v

    u

  • Numerical results

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 31

    � Computational domain

    Reproducing elements

    Blending elements

    -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-1

    -0.8

    -0.6

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    U = 0

    U = 0

    v = 0 v = 0

    Dirichlet boundary conditions

    0)0,1(

    0)1,0(

    v

    u

    Neumann boundary conditions

    yyyyxxy

    xyxyxxx

    tnn

    tnn

    =+

    =+

    σσ

    σσ

  • Numerical results

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 32

    � Quadratic elements (i.e. order of =2)

    Mesh sizes

    10 X 10

    20 X 20

    40X 40

    80 X 80

    160 X 160

    320 X 320

  • Numerical results

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 33

    � Cubic elements (i.e. order of =3)

    120 X 120

  • Numerical results

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 34

    � Comparison of convergence rates

    � Standard XFEM 2.5/3.0 3.4/4.0

    (order = 1)

    � Modified abs-enrichment 2.4/3.0 2.5/3.0

    � Corrected XFEM 2.8/3.0 3.7/4.0

    (order = order )

    • Corrected XFEM has higher accuracy as well.

    Quadratic Cubic

  • �Motivation

    � Interpolation of interface

    � Sub-cell integration

    �Higher-order XFEM formulations

    � Standard XFEM

    �Modified abs-enrichment (Möes et. al., 2003)

    �Corrected XFEM (Fries, 2007)

    �Numerical results

    � Conclusion

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 35

    Contents

  • Conclusion

    7/14/2009 K.W. Cheng, Higher-Order XFEM 36

    � Standard XFEM yields best results when first order partition-of-unities are used; however, convergence rates are still suboptimal.

    � Modified abs-enrichment yields suboptimalconvergence rates for all orders of

    � Corrected XFEM yields close-to-optimalconvergence rates when order of = order of .

    � Higher-order XFEM for curved weak discontinuities is possible.

  • Thank you!

    Kwok-Wah Cheng and Thomas-Peter Fries