Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ENERGOLD MINERALS INC.
Report on Exploration –High Resolution Aerial Imagery Survey and Geology at Ontario Mining Claim 4261651 Located in Moncrieff Township, Ontario June 30, 2015
Benjamin Batson, P.Geo
Toronto, Ontario
Table of Contents
1. Summary ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 5
2. Property Description ....................................................................................................................................... 5
3. Property Location and Access ......................................................................................................................... 6
4. High Resolution Aerial Survey ......................................................................................................................... 7
UAV Technical Specifications .............................................................................................................................. 7 UAV View and Drawing ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Specifics of the Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Quality Control .................................................................................................................................................... 8
5. Prospecting and Geology ................................................................................................................................ 9
Sample: 074 Stralak .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Sample: 075 Stralak .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Sample: 076 Stralak .......................................................................................................................................... 12 Sample: 077 Stralak .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Sample: Rhyolite Boulder ................................................................................................................................. 14 Sample: E5420014 ............................................................................................................................................ 15
6. Results and Discussion .................................................................................................................................. 16
7. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................ 16
8. Personnel ...................................................................................................................................................... 18
9. Statement of Expenditure ............................................................................................................................. 18
10. Statement of Qualification ............................................................................................................................ 19
11. MAP FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ 20
FIGURE 1 ‐ 2015 LOCATION AND ASSESSMENT WORK MAP (4261651) .......................................................... 20 FIGURE 2 ‐ 2015 ASSESSMENT WORK MAP ‐ CLAIM 4261651 ......................................................................... 20 FIGURE 3 ‐ PROSPECTIVITY MAP (CLAIM 4261651) .......................................................................................... 20 FIGURE 4 – INTERPRETED TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS ..................................................................................... 20 FIGURE 5 – COMPARISON OF NTS TOPOGRAPHY TO INTERPRETED TOPOGRAPHY ........................................ 20
4 | P a g e
1. Summary
The Stralak Zinc‐Silver Property (the “Property”) is comprised of twelve (12) unpatented mining claims covering
approximately 1,645 hectares (4,065 acres) of land situated in Moncreiff, Craig and Ulster Townships in Ontario.
The Property is 100% owned by Energold Minerals Inc., a private company.
Annual assessment work totaling $41,200 per year is required under the Ontario Mining Act to maintain the
Stralak Zinc‐Silver Property (the “Property”) in good‐standing on an annual basis.
A total of $12,846 of exploration assessment work is described within the body of this report.
This report has been prepared for exploration work on one of the claims which comprise the total continuous
land package. This claim, 4261651 (Sudbury), measures 256 hectares in size and is located on far south east end
of the claim group. See “Figure 1 ‐ 2015 LOCATION AND ASSESSMENT WORK MAP (4261651)”.
The exploration work for which this report was prepared exceeds the annual requirement for exploration
expenditure for the year 2015 and excess expenditure will be filed and credited towards future expenditure
requirements on the claim group.
A high resolution aerial image survey, under contract by Energold Minerals Inc. (“the Owner”) to Batson
Consulting Services was conducted over Ontario Mining Claim 4261651 at a resolution of ten (10) centimetres
per pixel. A detailed digital elevation model was also created from the imagery obtained in the aerial survey.
A total of four (4) geophysical targets were determined to fall within the claim boundary of 4261651 from a
previous airborne electromagnetic (“EM”) survey under contract by the Owner to Fugro Airborne Surveys, now
CGG. One (1) of these four (4) targets were prospected and outcrop samples were collected to further examine
the stratigraphy in the vicinity of the EM target. The location of these samples are noted on “Figure 2 ‐ 2015
ASSESSMENT WORK MAP ‐ CLAIM 4261651”.
Hand specimens were cut using a rock saw from samples collected in the field. Each of these samples are
described in detail within this report. See Section 5: Prospecting and Geology.
Additional work is warranted at this time to prospect at the four EM target sites (See “Figure 2”). A complete
assessment of the geological environment should be carried out in the area measuring 500 metres (in north
south direction) and 1 kilometre (in the east west direction) immediately west of the hand specimens described
herein, which serve as a starting basis to describe the relevant lithologies in the area. The exploration budget
for the recommended program is $10,000 for Claim 4261651.
1. Introduction
A program was carried out on an unpatented mining claim, entitled 4261651, which is part of the Stralak
Property which is comprised of approximately 1,645 hectares (4,065 acres) of land situated in Moncreiff, Craig
and Ulster Townships in Ontario.
The Property is 100% owned by a private company, Energold Minerals Inc., with a main office located at Suite
1200, 220 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2W4.
Mr. Benjamin Batson (P. Geo.) is a Practicing Member in good standing of the Association of Professional
Geoscientists of Ontario and was responsible for supervising the exploration activities summarized herein and
is the author of this report. The author of this report was present on‐site for one (1) day on June 24, 2015 to
carry out a high resolution aerial imaging survey and to examine the geology at the site of an electromagnetic
(“EM”) geophysical target located in the south east portion of the mining claim. Planning for this site visit and
survey was undertaken during the five (5) days prior to the field portion of the program. Field data processing,
map production, sample cutting and report writing was carried out for the three days following the program.
Two (2) days, in total, were spent travelling to and from the site from the Company’s office in Toronto.
All reference to location on the Property is by means of Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM NAD83 Zone 17).
A list of personnel contracted to perform work on the Property which is summarized in this report is provided
in Section 8 ‐ Personnel.
2. Property Description
Benjamin Batson staked the subject claim, an unpatented mining claim 4261651 on June 17, 2013. This mining
claim was recorded in the name of Energold Minerals Inc. in Sudbury on July 3, 2015. During September 2013,
an airborne EM survey was conducted over the property. Until June 2015, no further exploration had been
conducted on this mining claim since the 2013 EM survey.
Mining claim 4261651 measures 256 hectares in size and requires $6,400 of exploration assessment work
annually to maintain the claim in good standing. This claim is part of a larger contiguous block of land measuring
1,645 hectares in size which is collectively known as the Stralak Zinc‐Silver Property.
The Stralak Property contains several mineral occurrences of zinc‐silver‐(copper‐lead) which are described in
the MDI Ontario database. No other staked claims or patented mining lands have been located adjacent or
contiguous to the Company’s claim group (see Figure 1).
The Property has a great deal of steep topography with very little overburden. Surface water flows west in small
creeks. Several small seasonal ponds are present on the claim group that are dry during the summer months.
On April 13, 2012, Energold Minerals Inc. acquired the Stralak Zinc‐Silver Property through the purchase and
sale of five (5) unpatented mining claims located in the townships of Moncrieff, Craig and Ulster. These claims
are shown in BOLD text in Table 1 below. These comprise the original core claims of the Property.
Table 1: List of Unpatented Mining Claims
Claim Number
Township/AreaRecording
Date Annual Work Requirement
4255242 CRAIG 2010‐Jun‐29 $3,600
4257769 CRAIG 2010‐Jun‐29 $800
4261655 CRAIG 2013‐Jul‐03 $3,200
4257768 MONCRIEFF 2010‐Jun‐29 $1,600
4261651 MONCRIEFF 2013‐Jul‐03 $6,400
4261652 MONCRIEFF 2013‐Jul‐03 $6,400
4261653 MONCRIEFF 2013‐Jul‐03 $6,400
4261654 MONCRIEFF 2013‐Jul‐03 $2,000
4261656 MONCRIEFF 2013‐Jul‐03 $2,800
4261657 MONCRIEFF 2013‐Jul‐03 $4,000
4249705 ULSTER 2010‐Jun‐30 $2,400
4255241 ULSTER 2010‐Jun‐29 $1,600
The Mineral Property Acquisition Agreement (the “Agreement”) executed between Energold and the joint
vendors conveyed an undivided one‐hundred percent (100%) interest in the unpatented mining claims (see
Table 1) located in the Benny Greenstone Belt. The Agreement reserves a 1.5% net smelter returns royalty (NSR)
which is jointly held by the vendors.
Subsequent staking by Energold of the lands peripheral to the core claims during 2013 expanded the land
holding from 385 hectares to 1,645 hectares. At the time of this report, all of the claims are in good standing.
3. Property Location and Access
The Property is located east of the Spanish River in Moncreiff, Craig and Ulster Townships and is situated in the
Sudbury Mining District in northern Ontario within the boundaries of the NTS 041‐I‐13 (National Topographic
Survey) map sheet.
Access to the east end of the Property by four‐wheel‐drive truck is by a partially graveled and dirt road that
connects the former Canadian Pacific railway siding at Stralak to the small community of Benny, Ontario which
is located two (2) kilometres west of Highway 144 by municipal graveled road. The community of Benny is
located 70 kilometres north west of Sudbury, Ontario. Accommodation for field programs is located at the
Windy Lake Motel along Highway 144 approximately 20 km by road from the site. Meals and fuel are also
available at this motel.
Many of the existing bush roads that exist on the Property have been overgrown with vegetation which limits
the ease of access to the southern and western portions of the Property. A good bush road oriented east‐west
in direction is accessible by four‐wheel‐drive (4x4) all‐terrain‐vehicle (ATV) during the summer months across
the length of the Property. Access during winter months is permissible by snowmobile along the same route
(see Figure 1).
The magnetic declination at the property centroid is minus 9.5° (west).
4. High Resolution Aerial Survey
A high resolution aerial imagery survey was carried out by Batson Consulting Services under contract to the
Owner of the claim. The purpose of this survey was to acquire high resolution imagery over the area of several
EM target locations which require follow‐up/ground‐truthing. It was envisaged that a high resolution image
would reveal prospective areas in the area where rock can be located in outcrop for mapping and sampling. The
survey, in conjunction with ground prospecting, delineated regions of prospective rock outcropping in the area
of the EM targets which are shown on Figure 3.
The aerial survey was conducted with a UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) manufactured by SenseFly (see
www.sensefly.com). The model of this aircraft is called eBee. It is controlled by eMotion software.
UAV Technical Specifications
Size Wingspan: 96 cm Wing area: 0.25 m2 Weight 750 g Styrofoam Plane Load: several different cameras included in weight.
Battery 3‐cell Lithium‐Polymer, Capacity: 1800 mAh Endurance up to approx. 50 minutes Propulsion Electric brushless motor Nominal static thrust: 670 gf Flight speed Normal cruise speed about: 27 knots ‐ 31 knots The eBee is equipped with a ground sensor and reverse engine technology for
Launch hand launch/Auto pilot Landing Landing speed is about 2 ‐ 17 knots, straight in and circular landing option
Camera/Sensor control Preprogramed and controlled by autopilot, no manual controller optionelectronic intergrated
Communication link Remote control: (two com links) MULTIPLEX – Modem Microhard N2420 backup manual control
UAV View and Drawing
Specifics of the Survey
On May 4, 2015, an application was prepared and submitted by Batson Consulting Services to Transport Canada
to in accordance with Civil Aviation Law for the purposes of obtaining an SFOC (Special Flight Operations
Certificate) for the aerial survey described herein. An SFOC was granted on May 20, 2015.
A total of 54.8 line kilometres of surveying was flown on June 24, 2015 at an elevation of 128 metres above the
take‐off reference elevation of 380 metres above mean sea level (“AMSL”) located at N46.7751027°
W81.6451770° (WGS84) in a north‐south direction. A total of three (3) flight missions were required to complete
sufficient data collection over the area for the generation of an orthorectified geoTIFF image over the study
area.
A detailed orthomosaic image of the aerial extents coverage was generated by off‐site data processing after the
field portion of the survey was complete. The geoTIFF image was created in Postflight Terra 3D 3 software.
Batson Consulting Services provided Energold with a geoTIFF image for use in map production.
Quality Control
A handheld Garmin GPSmap78 was used to confirm the location and elevation of the reference take‐off location.
In‐field, post flight data processing was carried out to identify the centroid and attitude of each photo and check
the location of the UAV relative to the intended location for the UAV. Once a successful check has been
completed, an initial processing algorithm is carried out to validate the integrity of each flight mission prior to
returning from the field for in‐office processing.
9 | P a g e
5. Prospecting and Geology
On June 24, 2015, two geologists (see Section 8 ‐ Personnel) prospected the area of a pre‐determined EM target
anomaly area (EM Conductor C) shown on Figure 2 in this report. The work was performed without the use of
the high‐resolution imagery prepared and described in this report. The objective of prospecting the target area
was to determine if rock exposure is sufficiently available in the area to warrant mapping and prospecting in the
area of the known EM anomaly. In addition, rock samples were to be collected to determine the rock units that
can be expected in subsequent exploration.
It was found that outcrop is abundant along ridges and in areas along the edges of thickly forested lowlands. A
total of six (6) hand‐specimens were collected and are described below.
It was noted that topography and changes in relief can be masked by tree cover and thick bush. These changes
range from a couple of metres of relief to near vertical embankments with up to 10 metres of vertical relief.
These areas offer good outcrop exposure and should be prospected in detail at every opportunity.
The area at “EM Conductor C” appears to be underlain by bimodal volcanics that strike in an east‐west direction
and dip steeply to the south. Banded tuffaceous units are present in close proximity to crystal tuffs and possible
fine grained mafic volcanics (or intrusives).
No sulphides of any consequence were noted in the area, however sufficient prospecting and mapping has not
been undertaken at this site to resolve the validity of the EM Conductor from the 2013 Fugro geophysical
program.
A three (3) day mapping and sampling program is required to locate the bedrock source of conductance at “EM
Conductor C” (see location on Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Sample: 074 Stralak
Location: 17 T 0450682 5180241
Outcrop Cut Sample
DESCRIPTION: Banded Tuff
Topography: Steep hills and swampy lowlands occur adjacent to this location. General relief adjacent to the
sample location varies by up to ~100m. Glacial till and outwash sand & gravel is common in the area but outcrop
is prevalent.
Mode of Occurrence: Lithology is fine grained, compositionally banded and volcanic in origin; probably water‐
lain.
Fabric: Moderately well‐developed slate cleavage is pervasive throughout. A dominate set of cross cutting
fractures (f‐1) occur at ~60° to foliation and have minor calcite and iron oxide minerals. A sub‐ordinate set of
fractures (f‐2) is developed at ~40° counter‐clockwise to foliation (in opposite direction to f‐1 fractures) but
appear to have similar mineralogy to f‐1 fractures.
Mineralogy: Compositional bands consists of granular aggregate lenses dominated by silicate in a medium dark
grained matrix with minor dark eyes of quartz and minor amounts of fine grained muscovite. Finer grained
bands have higher sericite ± chlorite content. Larger ghost crystals were not definitively identified but resemble
cordierite textures found in pelitic lithologies.
Sample: 075 Stralak
Location: 17 T 0450603 5180315
Outcrop
Cut Sample
DESCRIPTION: Rhyolite Porphyry
Topography: Steep hills and swampy lowlands occur adjacent to this location. General relief is low at this site
across a moderately open lowland that encouragement for outcrop locally despite the abundance of glacial
outwash beneath the moss‐covered forest floor.
Mode of Occurrence: Dark greenish‐grey colored rhyolite with porphyritic textures. Matrix is aphanitic and
irregularly shaped phenocrysts vary up to 2mm in diameter. Variable silicification is present in outcrop but not
noted in the cut slab.
Fabric: Poorly developed, spaced cleavage with minor crosscutting quartz‐carbonate‐iron oxide infilling. Flow
banding is very weakly preserved.
Mineralogy: The lithology is dominated by potassium feldspar in a fine grained quart and k‐spar matrix. No
sulphide is recognized.
Sample: 076 Stralak
Location: 17 T 0450638 5180308
Outcrop
Cut Sample
DESCRIPTION: Crystal Tuff
Topography: Steep hills and swampy lowlands occur adjacent to this location.
Mode of Occurrence: Strongly foliated crystal tuff dominated by coarse grained, augened, potassium feldspar
crystals, lithic clasts and finer grained, dark quartz eyes in a fine grained matrix.
Fabric: A strong penetrative foliation augens phenocryst minerals and shows a weakly developed c‐s type fabric
indicative of post‐crystallization shearing. Primary flow textures may be parallel to the foliation.
Mineralogy: Potassium feldspar, quartz and light colored lithic fragments dominate the mineralogy. The
aphanite ground mass of the matrix is dominated by crushed feldspar and quartz but may contain minor chlorite.
No sulphides are present.
Sample: 077 Stralak
Location: 17 T 0450623 5180324
Outcrop Cut Sample
DESCRIPTION: Dyke
Mode of Occurrence: Intermediate lithology (possibly dyke or sill) is aphanitic and massive with no obvious
banding.
Fabric: Poorly developed cleavage is recognized. Cross cutting fractures have minor calcite and iron oxide
minerals and minor bleaching along some fractures is recognized.
Mineralogy: Individual mineral grains are too small to conclusively identify in the field although light colored
grains appears to be feldspars. Trace amounts of pyrite are present throughout.
Sample: Rhyolite Boulder
Location: 17 T 0450679 5180311
Description: HORNFELSED RHYOLITE/CALC‐SILICATE
General: This is an erratic bolder measuring ~30x30x40cm in size and was collected along the side of a well‐
travelled quad trail. Immediately west of this location are several large outcrops of felsic volcanic (rhyolite) and
the relative elevation rises by ~45m before dropping into a boggy lowland.
Topography: Steep hills and swampy bogs occur adjacent to this location. General relief adjacent to the sample
location varies by up to ~100m. Glacial till and outwash sand & gravel is common in the area but outcrop is
prevalent.
Mode of Occurrence: Flow‐banded and hornfelsed rhyolite or hornfelsed calc‐silicate. This may represent either
the basal rhyolite margin or an arenaceous, calcareous meta‐psammite lithology, however lacking any
phyllosilicate content.
Fabric: The sample exhibits a moderately well‐developed flow banding and a week flattening foliation parallel
to the banding. Compositional bands are characterized by elongated lens enriched in silica floating in a matrix
of quartz, feldspar, ± hornblende ± cordierite
Mineralogy: quartz, k‐spar, ?hornblende, ?plagioclase, ?ankerite, ?cordierite
Sample: E5420014
Location: 17 T 0450642 5180209
Description: SILICIFIED ZONE IN FELSIC VOLCANIC
General: Silicified zone in felsic volcanic.
Topography: Relative relief is steep with large areas of bedrock exposed across areas measuring ~40m across
strike of foliation, ~20m along strike of foliation and measuring between 2‐10m in elevation. Steep hills drop
into swampy lowlands both to the northeast, northwest and south of this location. General relief adjacent to
the sample location varies by up to ~40m. The surface of this outcrop is glacially polished.
Mode of Occurrence: Slightly porphyritic rhyolite with high silica alteration along a fracture surface
perpendicular to a spaced foliation. Silica flooding appears to either penetrate along or predominate competent
lithons in the cleaved rhyolite. Silicification predates cleavage development.
Fabric: Weak spaced foliation = 060/85° N. Alteration appears to be fracture controlled along spaced joints at
~140/~90.
6. Results and Discussion
The aerial imagery is of good quality and shows very clearly where lowlands and areas with very little outcrop
exposure can be expected. The map product provides a region of prospectivity that requires mapping and
prospecting to determine the bedrock source of the 2013 EM conductor.
A deep pool of water is noted on in a catchment basin along the Moncrieff River that suggests that bedrock is
buried locally beneath significant glacial overburden.
The forest canopy is thick locally which masks the appearance of steep cliffs in the aerial image. These abrupt
changes in topography provide good outcrop for mapping as evidenced by the outcrop locations described in
this report.
Prior to the high resolution aerial survey, Energold had no knowledge of outcrop density in this area. It was
noted that the NTS topo data in the area does not provide adequate resolution to reliably distinguish water
filled swamps with no outcrops versus low lying lands with potential outcrop. Also, lineaments were not well
defined using NTS topo data. The first step was to use the image created to generate an interpretation of
topography (see Figure 4). Next, a comparison of interpreted topography was made to to the existing NTS
topography (see Figure 5).
After visiting the site and traversing the Fugro (2013) EM Conductor C location, the decision was made to aerial
survey for a high resolution image so we could make sense, both geologically and logistically of where one could
expect outcrop and where there were lowlands that would bury any bedrock source of conductance. A test
area was selected and prospected at ‘EM Conductor C’. The lithologies/stratigraphy is described in this report.
Mixed bimodal volcanics are present in the area of the EM Conductor “C” in bedrock as tuffaceous felic units
with varying textures (crystal tuff and banded tuff) as well as very massive mafic dykes (or massive volcanic?).
An angular boulder of rhyolite was located on the access trail that is believed to be proximal to the bedrock
source of felsic volcanics in the area.
Conductive horizons modeled in a volcanic succession are key target areas for further prospecting and geological
review for zinc‐silver mineralization as noted on claim 4257769 located 4.5km to the north‐west. A field
program should be focused on investigating these areas EM targets across the Property. Claim 4261651 contains
four (4) of such target areas which in their own right, are deserving of several days of mapping and follow‐up.
7. Recommendations
Together with prospecting and the aerial image the Company was able to determine if there are prospecting
target sites with outcrop likely in the vicinity of the EM targets with coincident topographic highs (and/or relief)
as seen only in the detailed interpreted topography in Figure 4. Specifically, at EM Conductor C and D, an area
that is prospective for mineralization was identified from the aerial imagery and interpreted topography that is
likely to contain rock outcropping, not swamp or lowlands.
Additional work is warranted at this time commencing with geological mapping to locate the source of bedrock
conductors. Figure 3 shows the priority prospecting area plotted on a base image obtained from the high
resolution survey described in this report.
A further interpretation of the geophysical data is recommended following ground truth mapping to re‐assess
the geophysical approach to generating targets for prospecting and mapping.
The next phase of exploration should examine the locations on site in Figure 4 in the vicinity of the EM
Conductors A through D (in Figure 2) where topographic contours depict small hills/knolls which we have
interpreted to be likely bedrock sources of conductance.
The budget for this program is $7,500 which includes two geologists, accommodation, transportation, ATV, fuel
and meals for approximately two (2) days of travel and three (3) days of ground work to prospect and map the
bedrock at the target areas on Claim 4261651.
8. Personnel
Report Author: Benjamin Batson, P. Geo Energold Minerals Inc. (Field Supervision) (10 years experience) Suite 1200‐220 Bay Street, Toronto, ON M5J 2W5 Geologists : Benjamin Batson, P. Geo Energold Minerals Inc. (Sample collection) (10 years experience) Suite 1200‐220 Bay Street, Toronto, ON M5J 2W5 (Sample collection) Paul K. Smith Earth Sciences Consulting (30 years experience) 1853 Sunken Lake Road, RR#2 Wolfville, NS, B4P 2R2 Aerial Survey Contractor: Benjamin Batson, P. Geo Batson Consulting Services (Field Data Collection) (10 years experience) 4396 Sills Bay Road, Sydenham, ON, K0H 2T0 (Data Processing, Maps Benjamin Batson, P. Geo Batson Consulting Services and report writing) (10 years experience) 4396 Sills Bay Road, Sydenham, ON, K0H 2T0
9. Statement of Expenditure
Assessment work expenditure for the program detailed in this report, inclusive of flight permitting, planning,
transportation, field costs, manpower and report writing are as follows:
Travel and Field Expenses 971.98$
Planning (5 days, reading reports etc.) (5 days x $500/day) 2,500.00$
Travel ‐ Man time (2 men x $500/day) 2,000.00$
Aerial Imaging (305 acres x $15/ac, approx. 55 line‐kms) 4,575.00$
Geology (2 men x $650/day) 1,300.00$
Compilation and map geology (office) ($500/day) 1,500.00$
TOTAL 12,846.98$
19 | P a g e
10. Statement of Qualification
Benjamin C. E. Batson, B.Sc., P.Geo. Vice President, Energold Minerals Inc.
Suite 1200 – 220 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2W4
STATEMENT of QUALIFICATION
I, Benjamin Batson, P. Geo. Do hereby certify that:
1. I graduated with a degree entitled Bachelor of Applied Science in Geological Engineering from Queen’s University
in Kingston, Ontario in 2006
2. I am a Practicing Member in good standing of the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario.
3. I have worked as a geologist for nine (9) years since my graduation from university.
4. I am responsible for the preparation of the report entitled “Report on Exploration –High Resolution Aerial Imagery
Survey and Geology at Ontario Mining Claim 4261651 Located in Moncrieff Township, Ontario” and dated June
29, 2015 (the “Report”) relating to the Stralak Zinc‐Silver Property of Energold Minerals Inc. This report is based
upon the work that was performed between May 04, 2015 through June 30, 2015 and supervised myself.
5. I am not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the subject matter of the Report that is not
reflected in the Report, whereby the omission to disclose such fact makes the Report misleading. The Report is
current as at June 30, 2015.
6. I maintain the office of Vice President of Energold Minerals Inc.
Dated this Thirtieth day of June, 2015.
Dated at Toronto, Ontario Benjamin Batson, B. Sc., P. Geo.
June 30, 2015 Professional Geoscientist, Ontario
Member 1853
20 | P a g e
11. MAP FIGURES
FIGURE 1 ‐ 2015 LOCATION AND ASSESSMENT WORK MAP (4261651)
FIGURE 2 ‐ 2015 ASSESSMENT WORK MAP ‐ CLAIM 4261651
FIGURE 3 ‐ PROSPECTIVITY MAP (CLAIM 4261651)
FIGURE 4 – INTERPRETED TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS
FIGURE 5 – COMPARISON OF NTS TOPOGRAPHY TO INTERPRETED TOPOGRAPHY
