Upload
robin-sweet
View
34
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
High Energy Physics FY 2007 OMB Presentation. Dr. Robin Staffin, Associate Director Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science September 26, 2005. High Energy Physics. Answering the most basic questions of our quantum universe - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
High Energy Physics
FY 2007 OMB Presentation
Dr. Robin Staffin, Associate DirectorOffice of High Energy Physics
Office of Science
September 26, 2005
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
2
High Energy Physics
Answering the most basic questions of our quantum universe
What IS the universe? Standing at the door of the third revolution. First revolution: discovery of the atom on
Chemistry, electronics, biology, medicine, communications, and materials ...
Second revolution: understanding the nucleus on The stars, sun’s energy, nuclear energy, nuclear
weaponry, and medical diagnostics & treatment Third revolution: the fundamental basis for matter, energy,
space and time. (Trillions of electron volts) Provides answers to how the universe came to be and how it will
evolve. A telescope that views the very beginning of the universe and shows how it evolved to the present.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
3
Particle Physics, Science and Society
Big science International visibility, prestige, Nobels, Huge international collaborations Workforce well-prepared for industry and technical careers
About 80% of HEP PhDs end up in industry or government (present company included)
Enabling science Accelerators: HEP accelerator and detector technology enables
many other scientific disciplines and medical applications High Speed Networking and the Grid
A field which is combined with practical usefulness and intellectual excitement
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
4
Outline (content?) of Briefing
Compelling Science Objectives Emabling Science and Technology for Society Training the Technological Workforce Budget Impact
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
5
A Critical Time for HEP
In the course of the next decade, we may discover a very different universe
The field of High Energy Physics is poised on the threshold of discovery.
HEP can address the important questions: What is the path to unification (“Einstein’s Dream”)? What is the origin of mass? Are there new dimensions of space & time? What can neutrinos tell us? Why more matter than antimatter? What is Dark Matter? What is Dark Energy (acceleration of the universe)?
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
6
Who will miss this science?
“To remain near the top, we must continue to look at new discoveries and new information.” – Speaker of the House, Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-IL)
“We can continue down the current path, as other nations continue to narrow the gap, or we can take bold, dramatic steps to ensure U.S. economic leadership in the 21st century and a rising standard of living for all Americans.” – Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA)
“…[the U.S. is] unilaterally disarming in high-energy physics at a time which may well be one of the most exciting periods of physics research in history.” – Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House
“It looks as though the innovation pipeline is slowly being squeezed dry.... [We] are losing the skills race…[and] are beginning to lose our preeminence in discovery as well.” – William Brody, President, Johns Hopkins
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
7
Top 5 HEP Results in FY2005
1. Excellent Tevatron Run II Performance
Factor of 2 increase in peak & integrated luminosity since FY04
Closing in on the SM Higgs
2. NuMI starts up: the era of precision neutrino physics begins
Smooth turn on and steady operation
3. Babar/Belle results show potential surprise
4. CDMS II data rules out light SUSY particles as dark matter candidates
5. QCD comes of age Nobel for Gross, Politzer and Wilczek Lattice QCD now a predictive science
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
8
HEP FY2005 news “below the fold”
SDSS observes acoustic vibrations of matter in the early universe
Initial results from (partially completed) Auger on ultra-high energy cosmic rays
Advances in future accelerator concepts
First photonic bandgap accelerator structure
Beam-driven plasma wakefield acceleration experiment achieves gradient of 45 GV/meter over 30 cm
Laser-driven plasma wakefield achieves similar gradients over few mm with excellent beam quality
Handheld 5 GeV accelerators for a variety of applications?
Multi-TeV accelerators in the future?
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
9
Accelerator R&D Program in OHEP
Purpose: Provide the scientific and technology base for the highly specialized accelerators which are essential to a forefront high energy physics research program Provide the key developments for advances in structural biology, materials
science, nuclear physics and medical applications Strategy: Support a broad program of accelerator technology R&D
addressing needs for short-term: improvements for existing specific facilities (Tevatron, B-
factory) mid-term: generic R&D for a class of possible facilities or applications
(superconducting magnet, superconducting rf, electron-position collider, hadron collider etc)
long-term (advanced accelerator R&D): advancing fundamental science and technology of accelerator concept and technology independent of application (plasma & laser acceleration, wakefield acceleration
which brings connections between present program and future applications.
Mid-term and Long-term R&D programs in OHEP are unique
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
10
Office of Science Funding for Accelerator R&D
Nuclear Physics
Fusion Energy Sciences
Basic Energy Sciences
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics ~ $60 Million
Nuclear Physics ~ $12-15 Million
Fusion Energy Sciences ~ $10 Million
Basic Energy Sciences ~ $1-2 Million
(69%)
(17%)
(2%) (12%)
From a recent SC- Survey
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
11
New Medium Initiatives
A number of requests for approval of CD-0 “Statement of Mission Need” were prepared and submitted:
• A generic Reactor-based Neutrino Detector (RND) to measure 13
• A generic off-axis (EvA) accelerator-based neutrino experiment for 13
and to probe the neutrino mass hierarchy
• A generic neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Experiment (DBDE) to probe the Majorana nature and an absolute mass scale of neutrinos
• A high intensity neutrino beam (Super Neutrino Beam: SNB) for neutrino CP-violation experiments
• A generic ground-based dark energy (DES or LSST) experiment
• A generic underground experiment to search for direct evidence of dark matter
In order to be ready to move forward expeditiously, this process has been moving in parallel with a Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) and P5 process.
Note: JDEM, ILC are considered to be above “medium-scale.”
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
12
HEP Major Program Thrusts -- Target
Major Questions
Physics Program
2005 2010 2015 2020+
Are there undiscovered principles of Nature?
What is Dark Energy?
Are there extra dimensions?
Do all the forces become one?
What is Dark Matter?
Tevatron
LHC
ILC
Blue = In operation Orange = Approved Purple = Proposed
LHCDES
LHC
CDMS, AXION ILCFuture DME
LHC
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
13
HEP Major Program Thrusts -- Target
Major Question
Physics Program
2005 2010 2015 2020+
What are neutrinos telling us?
How did the universe come to be?
Why so many particles?
What happened to the antimatter? B-factory
Blue = In operation Orange = Approved Purple = Proposed
LHC
MINOSMiniBooNE Super Beam
LHC
Tevatron/B-factory LHC
EvA
reactor
Super Beam
DBDE
LHC
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
14
ILC
HEP Major Program Thrusts -- Over Target
Major Questions
Physics Program
2005 2010 2015 2020+
Are there undiscovered principles of Nature?
What is Dark Energy?
Are there extra dimensions?
Do all the forces become one?
What is Dark Matter?
Tevatron
LHC
ILC
Blue = In operation Orange = Approved Purple = Proposed
LHC
JDEM, LSST
LHC
CDMS, AXION
DES
ILCFuture DME
ILC
ILC
ILCILC
LHC ILC
ILC
ILC
ILC
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
15
HEP Major Program Thrusts-- Over Target
Major Question
Physics Program
2005 2010 2015 2020+
What are neutrinos telling us?
How did the universe come to be?
Why so many particles?
What happened to the antimatter? B-factory
Blue = In operation Orange = Approved Purple = Proposed
LHC
MINOSMiniBooNE
LHC
Tevatron/B-factory LHC
EvA
reactorSuper Beam
Super Beam
DBDE
LHC
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
16
Advisory Process- working together with NSF
Many of the new initiatives involve other agencies: existing advisory panels are not always adequately configured.
A hierarchy of questions to be addressed:
1. Overall shape of field – “grand strategy” National Academies study (EPP2010), HEPAP…
2. What priority to give to medium scale area X vs. area Y? – “strategy” Re-establish the P5 panel
3. What is the best project in area X? – “tactics” Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) Anticipate several of these with different reporting lines to cover the
various areas
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
17
Advisory Committee Flow Chart
HEPAPHEPAP
P5P5
NuSAGNuSAG
NSACNSAC
DOE-NPDOE-NP DOE-HEPDOE-HEPNSFNSF
Other SAG’s Other SAG’s
Other agenciesOther agencies
Other panelsOther panels
future
T
actic
s
S
trat
egy
A
genc
ies
EPP 2010
EPP 2010
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
18
OHEP Funding History- As Spent $ (Then Year $)
High Energy Physics Budget History and 5 Year Projections
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
Fiscal Year
Mil
lion
s of
Th
en-Y
ear
Dol
lars
History Target Over Target
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
19
% Change in SC Fundingbetween FY 2000 and FY 2005
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
20
Planning for the Future- assumptions with recent budget trend
Current U.S. accelerator-based program is world-leading, but finite in lifetime Termination of B-factory followed by Tevatron MINOS will ramp down toward the end of the decade also
LHC participation will be a central piece of the program The Linear Collider is our highest priority for a future major facility,
but timescale is uncertain and cannot be done without either an increase in resources or a reduction in cost
Agreements on international partnerships also have to be arranged
Hence
We are planning for a portfolio of medium scale, medium term experiments to start construction in the period 2007-10
Scientific opportunities are compelling neutrino physics (APS study); dark matter, dark energy…
Resources will become available, through redirection
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
21
HEP Future Scenario at Target
Target Scenario: After ~2010, LHC is the only operating high-energy physics accelerator in the world + non-accelerator experiments (neutrinos, dark energy, dark matter)
Early termination of Run II and B-Factory A new Neutrino program (EvA) after completion of MINOS Slow construction of super neutrino beam facility LC still in R&D phase (resource limited) LHC addressing questions of unification, origin of mass, extra dimensions,
and dark matter. But marginal coverage of dark energy, matter-antimatter asymmetry
Discovery at LHC of new physics is almost guaranteed. Workforce issues:
Need to be reduced by ~25% Without major new or upgraded facilities on the horizon, US HEP program
activities would most likely move overseas or out of field, resulting in weakening of the domestic program
The U.S. will lose leadership in high-energy accelerator technology
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
22
The Big Issues in the Target
Future of HEP facilities B-Factory ops (total investment ~$0.8B) end after FY06
Loss ~ a factor of two in data (vs over target) Cede CP violation physics to Japan. Large number (~300) of RIFs, bumpy transition to LCLS
Tevatron ops (total investment ~$1.5B) end after FY08
Lose ~30-50% of data, possible indications of new physics before LHC
Large number (~300) of RIFs inevitable
No domestic HEP facilities from 2008 until (perhaps) super neutrino beam (2015). US as a user, not a leader.
ILC on slow track: construction start 2015(?), producing physics data 15 years after LHC turn-on. May lose to Europe or to Japan, who will question if they need the US.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
23
Meaning of FY07-12 Target Budget for HEP
International reaction will be swift and strong. Following BTeV, RSVP, and AMS Weakening our bargaining role at CERN Major impact on any international collaboration involving the US “Why should we believe the US when it says it wants to pursue the ILC?” Undercuts continuation of Run 2 and other near term programs
Eg. EvA and the UK
The end of an era US leadership role in the future of HEP -- one that it has led over the
last half-century -- will essentially come to an end. The outsourcing of US HEP (“Exit America”)
FY2007 will be a watershed year
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
24
HEP Dashboard 2007
subProgram FY06 Request
FY07 Target FY07 Over Target
Comment
Facility Ops B-factory restored in OT
LHC Flat as LHC ramps-up
ILC ~Flat
New Initiatives
Growth in dark energy + nu’s
Research + Accel. R&D
Decimated at Target
Green = Healthy, Light Green = Issues, Yellow = Serious Issues, Red = Terminated
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
25
HEP Dashboard 2011
subProgram FY11 Target FY11 Over Target
Comment
Facility Ops Only NuMI in US at Target
LHC Constant effort in OT
ILC No out-year growth in Tgt
New Initiatives
Growth in dark energy + nu’s
Research + Accel. R&D
Held flat in Target
Green = Healthy, Light Green = Issues, Yellow = Serious Issues, Red = Terminated
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
26
HEP Future Scenario at Over Target
Over Target Scenario: After ~2010, LHC is still the only operating high-energy physics accelerator in the world
Run II and B-Factory programs are complete as planned Super Neutrino Beam will provide a world leadership for US in neutrinos
Neutrino program evolving after MINOS by utilizing super neutrino beam facility which is based on LC technology
JDEM is poised to probe the secrets of Dark Energy Linear Collider will be ready to exploit LHC discoveries by later part of decade
LC in technically-limited R&D phase until 2009, then engineering design LHC addressing questions of unification, origin of mass, extra dimensions, and
dark matter. And LC will address this and more (see next slide). Research program strengthened to enhance U.S. impact on LHC Lattice QCD and SciDAC efforts exploit opportunities for U.S. to lead in
targeted areas of computation and simulation
This is an exciting and highly productive scientific program.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
27
ILC & LHC Synergy
The high energy of the LHC will establish that new phenomena at the Terascale exist. The precision studies of the ILC will enable us to interpret these new discoveries.
In every scenario, the LHC discoveries require the ILC to illuminate their meaning.
The results from the LHC and ILC give a multiplicative (not additive) impact on understanding the new Terascale phenomena. Together, they provide a telescope that peers back to the time when the universe was formed.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
28
World leading neutrino physics program
A variety of near and mid term initiatives in a different scales can put the US as the world leader of neutrino physics program
Electron Neutrino Appearance Experiment (EvA): MINOS follow-on experiment utilizing NuMI beam from Fermilab to Northern
Minnesota (maximum use of existing investment) Could obtain world best measurements on mixing angle and mass hierarchy
Reactor Neutrino Detector (RND) Independent measurement on mixing angle Options from $15M~$80M (off-shore vs on-shore)
Double Beta Decay Experiment (DBDE) Measure absolute mass scale of neutrinos Options from $10M~$200M (off-shore vs on-shore)
Super Neutrino Beam (SNB) Study CP violation in neutrino sector Synergetic relationship with ILC R&D technology
Many as Jointly Supported Program with NSF and DOE-NP
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
29
Exciting Dark Energy & Dark Matter
A variety of near and mid term initiatives in a different scales can put the US as the world leader of dark energy and dark matter physics program
Dark Energy Survey (DES): Ground based dark energy experiment Fabricate new camera for an existing telescope (~$20M)
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) Ground based dark energy experiment as a next generation of DES New telescope, new camera (~$200M)
Joint Dark Energy Mission (JDEM) Space based joint mission with NASA for a dedicated dark energy survey DOE funds instrumentation ($300~500M)
Dark Matter Search Detector to search for direct evidence of dark matter
Many as Jointly Supported Program with NSF and NASA
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
30
Accelerator R&D with a promising future
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
31
Summary
International partnerships Premature end of B-factory, Tevatron programs will set off a crisis for
US standing (after cancellation of BTeV and RSVP) as a “good partner” for int’l HEP projects
Increases difficulty of getting foreign contributions for neutrino and dark energy initiatives, ILC R&D,…
Builds on existing uncertainty in the aftermath of US recent US terminations.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Tables & Charts
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
33
FY 2007 OMB Budget(B/A in Millions)
FY 2006 FY 2007 OverFY 2005 Pres Req Target Target
Proton Accelerator-based Physics Research 78.3$ 75.4$ 68.3$ 84.5$ Facilities 314.2 311.7 305.2 318.2$
Subtotal 392.5$ 387.1$ 373.5$ 402.7$ Electron Accelerator-based Physics
Research 26.3$ 24.8$ 21.6$ 26.4$ Facilities 104.2 108.0 70.4 101.9
Subtotal 130.5$ 132.8$ 92.0$ 128.3$ Non-Accelerator Physics/Research 55.6$ 38.6$ 42.1$ 100.3$ Theoretical Physics/Research 50.0$ 49.1$ 43.4$ 51.6$ Advanced Technology R&D/Research 89.1$ 106.3$ * 119.3$ * 158.1$ Construction/NuMI 0.7$ -$ -$ 10.0$ TOTAL HEP Budget 718.4$ 713.9$ 670.3$ 851.0$
*Includes $18.2M for SBIR/STTR in FY 2006 and $17.0M for SBIR/STTR in FY 2007 Target, $20.0M Over Target.
General Plant Projects 14.6 22.3 21.8 21.8
Accelerator Improvements Projects 6.1 2.4 0.0 0.0
Capital Equipment 63.7 39.8 40.7 106.7
Total, Capital Operating Expenses 84.4 74.5 62.5 128.5
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
34
FY 2007 BudgetMajor Items of Equipment (B/A in Millions)
Total Project Cost (TPC)
Total Estimated Cost (TEC)
Prior Year Appro-priations FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Over Target Increment Over Target Acceptance Date
LHC — Machine 111.5 91.9 87.8 4.1 0 0 0 0 FY 2005
LHC — ATLAS Detector 103.01 55.5 49.2 3.9 1.6 0.6 0 0 FY 2007
LHC — CMS Detector 147.02 71.8 64.1 3.5 2.9 0 0 0 FY 2008
GLAST/LAT 45.03 45.0 33.6 11.4 0 0 0 0 FY 2005
Run IIb D-Zero 10.74 10.7 8.8 1.9 0 0 0 0 FY 2006
VERITAS 7.45 4.8 1.6 2.1 1.1 0 0 0 FY 2006
BaBar (IFR) Upgrade 4.9 4.9 3.0 1.2 0.7 0 0 0 FY 2006
Electron Neutrino Appearance (EvA) Detector 150.0 150.0 0 0 0 10.3 +12.3 22.6 FY 2010
Reactor Neutrino Detector 15.06 15.0 0 0 0 3.0 +7.0 10.0 FY 2010
Ground-based Dark Energy Exp. (DES) 20.0 20.0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 FY 2009
Ground-based Dark Energy Exp. (LSST) 105.0 105.0 0 0 0 0 +10.0 10.0 FY 2012
Space-based Dark Energy Exp. 280.0 280.0 0 0 0 0 +15.3 15.3 FY 2016
Double Beta Decay Exp. 5.07 5.0 0 0 0 0 +10.0 10.0 FY 2011
Total, Major Items of Equipment 28.1 6.3 15.4 +62.6 78.0
1The total US contribution (TPC) for this project is $163,750,000, including $60,800,000 from NSF.2The total US contribution (TPC) for this project is $167,250,000, including $20,200,000 from NSF.3The total TEC/TPC includes DOE scope only and reflects a rebaselining approved March 2005.4The total TPC for this project is $18,143,000 including $3,068,000 from NSF and $4,356,000 from foreign partners.5The total TPC for this project is $17,534,000 including $7,333,000 from NSF, $2,000,000 from the Smithsonian Institution, and $802,000 from foreign partners.6The Over Target level supports a major role in a domestic experimental facility for a reactor based neutrino experiment, with a preliminary estimated TEC/TPC of $75,000,0007At the Target, HEP and NP jointly support an initiative in neutrino-less double beta decay physics starting in FY 2008 with a combined preliminary estimated TEC/TPC of $63,000,000; the HEP TEC contribution is $5,000,000. At the Over Target, HEP pursues an independent competitive alternative technology double beta decay project starting in FY 2007 with a preliminary estimated TEC/TPC of $75,000,000.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
35
High Energy PhysicsOutyear Funding Profile (B/A in Millions)
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
TARGET 670.3 668.0 653.3 637.1 665.5 Facility Ops 303.3 293.4 226.9 206.4 202.9
ILC 35.2 30.0 40.0 45.0 25.0 New Initiatives 17.9 29.9 68.2 56.5 47.1
LHC 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 Research 199.9 198.8 198.6 198.0 198.7
Advanced Tech R&D 54.0 53.4 53.3 53.2 53.4 Construction - 2.6 6.3 18.0 78.5
OVER TARGET 851.0 984.2 1,054.1 1,185.8 1,283.4 Facility Ops 335.4 322.9 270.9 225.9 205.9
ILC 60.0 90.0 90.0 50.0 - New Initiatives 80.5 112.5 180.0 191.9 150.0
LHC 60.0 60.0 62.4 64.9 67.5 Research 242.6 254.1 255.3 295.1 284.6
Advanced Tech R&D 62.5 67.5 67.8 78.0 75.4 Construction 10.0 77.2 127.7 280.0 500.0
Note: New Initiative category covers R&D’s specific for Neutrino and Dark Energy facilities
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
36
High Energy PhysicsOutyear Funding Profile
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
($M
)
Construction
Advanced TechR&DResearch
LHC
New Initiatives
ILC
Facility Ops
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
($M
)
Target Profile Over Target Profile
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
37
FY 2007 OMB Budget
Funding by Science(reference HEP budget: Funding Profile; pg1)
Theory
Adv. Tech
Proton PhysicsElectron
Physics
Non-Accel Physics
Funding by Site(re ference SC Overv iew funding by site )
Fermi
SLAC
Smaller Labs
Other*
Universities*HQ undesignated university and lab reserves as well as S BIR/S TTR
Funding by Type(reference HEP budget: HEP pie chart; pg14)
OtherInfrastructure
Facility Operations
Laboratory Research
Universities
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
BACKUP SLIDES
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
39
Questions to be Answered
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
40
Quantum Universe Questions and Tools for a Scientific Revolution
Question Tools
1. Are there undiscovered principles of nature: New symmetries, new physical laws? The quantum ideas that so successfully describe familiar matter fail when applied to
cosmic physics. Solving the problem requires the appearance of new forces and new particles signaling the discovery of new symmetries—undiscovered principles of nature’s behavior.
Tevatron, LHC, International Linear Collider
2. How can we solve the mystery of dark energy? The dark energy that permeates empty space and accelerates the expansion of the universe
must have a quantum explanation. Dark energy might be related to the Higgs field, a force that fills space and gives particles mass.
LHC, International Linear Collider, JDEM
3. Are there extra dimensions of space? String theory predicts seven undiscovered dimensions of space that give rise to much of
the apparent complexity of particle physics. The discovery of extra dimensions would be an epochal event in human history; it would change our understanding of the birth and evolution of the universe. String theory could reshape our concept of gravity.
LHC, International Linear Collider,
4. Do all the forces become one? At the most fundamental level all forces and particles in the universe may be related, and
all the forces might be manifestations of a single grand unified force, realizing Einstein’s dream.
International Linear Collider, and Proton Decay
5. Why are there so many kinds of particles? Why do three families of particles exist, and why do their masses differ so dramatically?
Patterns and variations in the families of elementary particles suggest undiscovered underlying principles that tie together the quarks and leptons of the Standard Model.
Tevatron, BaBar, and BTeV
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
41
Quantum Universe Questions and Tools for a Scientific Revolution
Question Tools
6. What is dark matter? How can we make it in the laboratory? Most of the matter in the universe is unknown dark matter, probably heavy particles
produced in the big bang. While most of these particles annihilated into pure energy, some remained. These remaining particles should have a small enough mass to be produced and studied at accelerators.
International Linear Collider and JDEM
7. What are the neutrinos telling us? Of all the known particles, neutrinos are the most mysterious. They played an
essential role in the evolution of the universe, and their tiny nonzero mass may signal new physics at very high energies.
NuMI/MINOS , Double Beta Decay Experiment and Neutrino Superbeams
8. How did the universe come to be? According to cosmic theory, the universe began with a singular explosion followed by
a burst of inflationary expansion. Following inflation, the universe cooled, passing through a series of phase transitions and allowing the formation of stars, galaxies and life on earth. Understanding inflation requires breakthroughs in quantum physics and quantum gravity.
LHC and RHIC
9. What happened to the antimatter? The big bang almost certainly produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter, yet
the universe seems to contain no antimatter. How did the asymmetry arise?
BaBar, BTeV, and Super Neutrino Beams
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Quantum Universe - Major U.S. Facilities
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
43
All had a solid justification in “bread-and-butter” physics – but history shows that unexpected discoveries are common and can open up entirely new directions
AGS at BNL N interactions 2 kinds of , CP violation, J/
SLAC nucleon form factors quarks in the proton
Fermilab fixed target neutrino physics b-quark collider W and Z top quark
CERN collider W and Z W and Z
PETRA at DESY top quark gluon jets
LEP/SLC electroweak physics electroweak physics
SuperK proton decay neutrino oscillation
SNO neutrino oscillation neutrino oscillation
Supernova decelerating universe accelerating universe surveys (dark energy)
LHC Higgs ?
Facility What it was Built to do What it is remembered forExample:Christopher Columbus route to India discovery of America
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
44
State of the field
The Standard Model is still standing – just Clear frontiers of research have appeared – we know surprises await
At the energy frontier (the TeV scale) In dark matter and dark energy In neutrino physics
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
45
APS neutrino study recommended
New Reactor experimentMeasure 13
New Accelerator experiment “off axis”Measure 13 and mass pattern
New Double beta decayexperimentProbe mass and Majorana nature
Decision pointhow big is 13?
Upgrade beamline
And/Or
New detector(s)
And/Or
Muon storage ring as neutrino factory
CP violation?
Next decadeNow
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
46
Neutrino surprises
Unlike quarks – there is a lot of mixing Masses tiny – not from Higgs? From GUT scale physics? Overall mass scale is unknown Hierarchy unknown (2+1 or 1+2) Are neutrinos their own antiparticles?
Or
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
47
HEP Results in FY05
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
48
Tevatron: key is luminosity
Top quark mass (GeV)
W b
oso
n m
ass
(GeV
)
L (
fb-1)
Standar
d
Model
Run IIprojections
Closing in on the the SM Higgs
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
49
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
50
Other Windows to New Physics
Discovery Potential over most of Bs mixing expected region
SUSY Chargino Sensitivity to 270 GeV!
Observation of Bs mixing
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
51
Present Neutrino Program
Minos Far detector
Minos near detector
MINOS program is just starting: • 2 GeV neutrinos• 5.4 Kiloton far detector at Soudan• 1 Kiloton near detector at FNAL• Most precise measurements for neutrino oscillation• disappearance
NEED TO ADD NUMI PROTON INTENSITY PLOT
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
52
B factory promise
Charmonium
s-Penguins
3.7 between CP violation in s-
penguin vs sin2 (cc)
0SK
0B
b
s
s
sd d
0SK
0B
b
s
s
sd d
SUSY contribution with new phases
New physics in loops?
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
53
Lattice QCD Results with TFlop computers
Lattice QCD calculations now consistent, accurate at ~1-2% level
Are making useful predictions
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
54
CDMSII – Direct Searches for WIMPS
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
55
Advisory Processes
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
56
Advisory Process - Scale of Program
One can go through a straw-man exercise to see if a reasonable subset of these initiatives could be worked into a realistic portfolio
Make reasonable assumptions about Tevatron and B-factory operations roll-off ILC R&D ramp-up US LHC
Bottom line is that O($50-100M) per year may be available to invest in new initiatives by the end of the decade
Complications: Any $ envelope will depend strongly on facility operations and LC R&D
funding in the out-years Not all projects are equal in science or scope, even within a given
physics area Are developing a set of criteria to evaluate projects
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
57
Advisory Process - Suggested Criteria
Scientific Potential : to what extent does the project have the ability to change our fundamental view of the universe?
Relevance: is the science important to DOE/HEP’s mission?
Value: does the level of scientific potential match the level of investment?
Alternatives: are there more cost-effective alternatives to get at the same (or most of the same) physics?
Timeliness: will the results come at the right time to have sufficient impact?
International: are similar efforts underway in other countries? Are there potential international partners for this effort?
Infrastructure: Does the project exploit, or help to evolve, existing infrastucture (including human capital)
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
58
National Academies Panel EPP2010
www.nationalacademies.org/bpa/epp2010.htmlwww.nationalacademies.org/bpa/epp2010.html
A new “decadal survey” Lay out the grand questions that are driving our field Describe the opportunities that are ripe for discovery Identify the tools that are necessary to achieve the scientific goals Articulate the connections to other sciences and to society Foster emerging worldwide collaboration Recommend a 15 year implementation plan with realistic, ordered priorities
Not a typical high energy physics advisory panel. It includes Leaders (non-physicists) in industry, government and academe
Strengthen connections with society Sharpen the physics questions
Non-particle physicists Engage other scientific communities
International participants Place US HEP in the international setting
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
59
The Role of P5
Recently re-constituted for 2 years To develop and maintain the roadmap of the field To address relative priorities of (medium-sized) proposed projects
within the program context
(Ideally) P5 would be asked to compare the recommended options from the SAG process and prioritize relative to one another
(More realistically) P5 will be given a nominal (optimistic but not “blue sky”) envelope of available funding for new initiatives and asked to prioritize within that constraint
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
60
NuSAG
Part of a new advisory process SAG’s to select “best in class” P5 to balance/prioritize areas
A Neutrino Scientific Advisory Group (NuSAG) initiated in March Asked to address
Choice of Reactor neutrino experiment Choice of Off-axis neutrino experiment Choice of neutrinoless double beta decay experiment
Also will be asked for recommendation on high intensity neutrino beam(s).
NuSAG is a joint subpanel of HEPAP and NSAC Reports through HEPAP to DOE-HEP and NSF; through NSAC to DOE-NP and NSF
We are considering how to set up an analogous SAG process for other scientific topics such as dark matter, dark energy and particle astrophysics.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
61
Review of Accelerator R&D Program
Initiated a comprehensive review of all aspect of the accelerator R&D programs supported by DOE-HEP and NSF-EPP
Specific Charge National Goals: Describe the needs and goals required for a rich and productive future
program in accelerator based particle physics Scope: Description of current program Quality:
Appraisal of scientific and technical quality of work being supported How US effort rates relative to worldwide effort
Relevance: How well the work being supported matches the needs and goals of HEP program Missing items? Over-emphasized or under supported areas?
Resources: Does the program have adequate resources to carry out the scope? Does the program make most efficient use of available resources?
Management: How well program is managed both in the field and in the agencies Setting goals, priorities, resource allocations, program balance & reporting
Training: Is Training of future accelerator work force adequately addressed?
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
62
Accelerator R&D Program
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
63
Accelerator R&D Program in OHEP
Purpose: Provide the scientific and technology base for the highly specialized accelerators which are essential to a forefront high energy physics research program
Strategy: Support a broad program of accelerator technology R&D addressing needs for short-term: improvements for existing specific facilities (Tevatron, B-factory) mid-term: generic R&D for a class of possible facilities or applications (super-
conducting magnet, super-conducting rf, electron-position collider, hadron collider etc)
long-term (advanced accelerator R&D): advancing fundamental science and technology of accelerator concept and technology independent of application (plasma & laser acceleration, wakefield acceleration
which brings connections between present program and future concepts.
In OHEP budget structure, these are roughly divided into
Short and Mid term = Accelerator Development
Long term = Accelerator Science
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
64
Accelerator R&D Program
Strong Integration of National Labs, Universities, and Industry
Supports Unique & Dedicated Research Facilities Advanced Wakefield Accelerator at ANL
Accelerator Test Facility at BNL
Photo-injector Laboratory (FNPL) at FNAL
L’OASIS at LBNL
NLCTA at SLAC
Neptune Laboratory at UCLA
Proposed SABER & ORION at SLAC
Support for Cultivation of Next Generation Accelerator Physicists HEP Accelerator R&D program supported production of over 230 Ph.D since 1982
US Particle Accelerator School: started in 1982, office located at FNAL: Two week intensive program being offered twice a year. Accepted as being equivalent to graduate schedule program credit (2~3 credit course)
Sponsoring major Conferences and Workshops
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
65
Current R&D Topics
New accelerator concepts : 13 institutions (16 groups) including 4 national labs (ANL, BNL, LBNL, SLAC) Laser acceleration: 6 groups Plasma acceleration: 9 groups Wakefield acceleration: 2 groups
Super Conducting Magnet Technology & Materials Development: 8 institutions including 3 national labs (BNL, FNAL, LBNL)
High Powered RF Sources & Accelerating Structures (ex: SC rf cavity): program at 9 institutions including 4 national labs (ANL, BNL, FNAL, SLAC)
Code Development: 5 institutions including 2 labs (LANL, LBNL)
Theory: 14 institutions including 1 national lab (LBNL)
Accelerator Experiments: 3 institutions including 1 national lab (SLAC)
Special Facilities: Unique and Dedicated Research Facilities (list in previous slide)
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
66
Over the last decade, funding for accelerator R&D has decreased by almost 30% if adjusted for cost-of-living factor (3.5~4% per year)
A number of visible impacts Termination of muon collider R&D program Termination of a number of university groups & grants Downsize of SC magnet groups at BNL, FNAL and LBNL ORION & SABER proposals put on hold for the last few years Delay upgrade and under utilization of existing Special Facilities (AWA,
ATF, FNPL, L’OASIS)
FY96-FY01 FY02-FY04 FY05
in FY04$ $62M~$67M $58M~$60M ~$56M
if adjusted for cost of living $67M~$76M $58M~$60M ~$54M
OHEP Accelerator R&D Funding History
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
67
Accelerator R&D in Other Parts of the World
Hard to account for the total size of the efforts and resources Europe: 16 major Advanced Accelerator Facilities Japan: 16 Advanced Accelerator Facilities Also advanced accelerator research labs at Taiwan, Korea, India,
China, Israel
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
68
International Collaboration
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
69
Partnering with others (Projects)
name TPC DOE Non-DOE com m ents
LHC-ATLAS 164.0 103.0 61.0 NSF
LHC-CMS 167.1 147.1 20.0 NSF
Run IIb CDF 13.5 10.4 3.1 foreign partners
Run IIb D-zero 19.9 12.5 7.4 NSF (3.1) and foreign partners
GLAST/LAT 136.6 42.0 93.4 NASA (93.4), Japan (1.2)
CDMS 18.4 4.9 13.5 NSF (9.3) and univers ities
Auger 8.7 4.7 4.0 NSF
VERITAS 14.7 4.8 9.9 NSF (6.6), Sm ithsonian (1.1) and others
AMS ~180 5.0 ~175 NASA and foreign partners
($M)
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
70
Partnering with others (experiments)
name Total US Non-US com m ents
BaBar 600 300 300
CDF 750 380 370
D-Zero 650 330 320
MINOS 200 150 50
AMS 450 30 420 ~95% funded by foreign partners
Auger 300 70 230
GLAST/LAT 130 50 80
Total number of collaborators
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
71
FY07 Target Details
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
72
Impacts of FY07 HEP Target: “What’s Out”
Operations of SLAC B-factory terminated at the beginning of FY 2007
Only costs are for linac maintenance, physics analysis support and PEP-II D&D. Assumes BES contribution of $40M for linac ops.
Detector and accelerator upgrades planned for installation in FY 2006 will be abandoned.
Cede to Japan all future B-factory discoveries and the scientific prestige that follows, after an ~$0.8B investment in construction and operations over a decade
Estimate ~300 FTE RIFs in FY07, some of which will be picked up by the BES program to support LCLS construction and operations.
Total PEP-II luminosity will be ~500 fb-1 (compare to ~900 fb-1 in Over Target)
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
73
Impacts of FY07 HEP Target: Significant Reductions
Research Program Significantly Reduced
Overall core research and technology R&D activities in the HEP program will be reduced by ~$19M in FY 2007 to meet overall budget constraints.
Reductions in these areas will be partially offset (at the ~30-40% level) by ramp-up of new initiatives
Rapid ramp-down of B-factory research and major program realignment will begin.
40 universities, 3 DOE labs (LBNL, LLNL and SLAC) and ~300 foreign researchers currently participate in this program
Estimate an elimination of ~100 university research FTEs and ~70 laboratory research FTEs in FY 2007, not including potential offsets from new initiatives
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
74
Impacts of FY07 HEP Target: “What’s In”
Facility Operations
Tevatron Collider and NuMI: Both the Tevatron Collider and the NuMI beam line will continue to run a technically-limited schedule in FY 2007.
Maintains U.S. leadership in energy frontier research and accelerator-based neutrino physics.
Overall effort reduced due to completion of Run II upgrades and operations-related R&D
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
75
Impacts of FY07 HEP Target: “What’s In”
Research
LHC: Support final installation, commissioning, and initial operations of the U.S.-supplied components of the LHC.
Facilitate remote participation by U.S. physicists in the start-up activities of the LHC
Support the software and computing infrastructure needed to provide U.S. scientists rapid and easy access to LHC data.
Note that the success of this program relies on ASCR providing an upgraded ESNet to access enormous LHC datasets. This upgrade is not funded in the ASCR Target.
ILC R&D: Pre-conceptual design of Linear Collider systems.
A reference design and preliminary cost is to be competed by the end of 2006, and this will identify key areas for aggressive R&D to reduce costs and/or improve operational reliability.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
76
Impacts of FY07 HEP Target: “What’s In”
New Initiatives
SNAP R&D: Develop new space-based experimental tools to study the mysterious dark energy
The SNAP R&D effort will be terminated in FY2007 in the absence of additional resources in the outyears and an interagency agreement on how to proceed. (does this belong here???)
Neutrinos: The R&D effort begun in FY2006 to develop new accelerator and detector technologies to enhance future neutrino physics program will continue, including:
Dedicated electron neutrino appearance exp’t w/ NuMI beam
Reactor-based experiment to precisely measure nu mixing
Neutrinoless double-beta decay exp’t (joint with NP)
R&D for super neutrino beam facility ramps up
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
77
FY07 Over Target Details
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
78
Impacts of FY07 HEP Over Target: “What’s In”
Facility Operations
Full operations of SLAC B-factory will be restored. Assumes BES contribution of $40M for linac ops.
Detector and accelerator upgrades planned for installation in FY 2006 to provide increased luminosity and cope with higher data rates will proceed as planned.
FY 2007 PEP-II luminosity will be ~150 fb-1.
Resolve whether current intriguing discrepancies in physics results between the SLAC B-factory and the Japanese B-factory are signs of new physics
Estimate ~80 FTE RIFs from SLAC HEP program in FY 2007 due to overall budget constraints, some of which will be picked up by BES to support LCLS construction.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
79
Impacts of FY07 HEP Over Target: “What’s In”
Research
ILC R&D: Expanded R&D and engineering that can support a 2011 construction start (see details)
Accelerated schedule for ILC construction positions the U.S. to regain world-leadership in HEP research in the next decade.
Restore core research and technology R&D: Overall core research activities in the HEP program will be restored to FY 2005 level-of-effort.
No RIFs in research activities.
The physics output of the B-factory and Tevatron Collider research programs will be maintained.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
80
Impacts of FY07 HEP Over Target: “What’s In”
Research
ESNet Upgrade:
This upgrade is funded in the ASCR Over Target budget but scientific impacts to the HEP program are described here.
This effort will implement a new architecture to serve the networking needs of all of the Office of Science, enabling programs to meet their future scientific goals which rely on data-intensive research.
SC networking requirements are driven by analysis of LHC data in FY07; other programs (nanotech, GTL) in later years.
Enable US researchers to fully analyze LHC data, maximize physics payoff and take a leading role in LHC discoveries
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
81
Impacts of FY07 HEP Over Target: “What’s In”
New Initiatives
Neutrino Experiments: Neutrino physics experiments begun in the FY 2007 Target will be expanded to provide:
Optimized utilization of the NuMI facility, via an accelerated schedule for the electron neutrino appearance experiment (EvA) that allows completion of the detector one year earlier.
Domestic experimental facilities (reactor-based neutrino experiment)
New MIE project for neutrino physics experiment complementary to and independent of the double beta decay experiment funded by NP.
Super Neutrino Beam Facility: Engineering design on this next-generation neutrino facility would begin in FY 2007, with a construction start in FY 2009.
This facility will allow comprehensive studies of neutrino properties by providing a neutrino beam 10 times more intense than those available with current accelerators.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
82
Impacts of FY07 HEP Over Target: “What’s In”
New Initiatives
Dark Energy: Proceed with new experimental tools to study the mysterious dark energy
JDEM mission concept will be completed in FY 2007; start eng. design in 2009 and fabrication in 2011.
Ground-based dark energy camera (DES) begins fabrication in 2007
A new ground-based dark energy telescope (LSST) begins advanced engineering design in 2007, with a fabrication start in 2009.
This is a multipurpose telescope with unique capabilities for studying dark energy and other phenomena, and would likely be a joint effort with the National Science Foundation (NSF).
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
83
ILC – LHC Synergy
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
84
The LHC can observe that new massive particles exist; the ILC will pinpoint which new force created them.
The Higgs boson is responsible for giving mass to particles. If it exists, the LHC will observe it. The ILC will tell us if it is the standard model Higgs, or is more complex.
The LHC can measure a combination of the number of extra spatial dimensions and their size; the ILC allows disentanglement of the number and size separately.
Examples of ILC – LHC Synergy
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
85
Supersymmetry provides the leading candidate for dark matter in the universe. The ILC can isolate it and measure its mass, in turn allowing the LHC to refine its measurements. Combining with cosmic background radiation probes in space, we can tell if this particle is the only dark matter particle.
The LHC and ILC are both needed to determine if the fundamental forces are unified – Einstein’s dream.
Examples of ILC – LHC Synergy
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
86
ILC as a telescope looking at the universe
in the first moments after the big bang.
era of force unification
era of quarks and gluons
era of protons and neutrons
era of nuclei
era of atoms
era of stars and galaxies
era of OMB and DOE
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
87
The Higgs boson is somewhat like the Bunraku puppeteers, dressed in black to be ‘invisible’, manipulating the players in the drama.
ILC & Higgs
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
88
collision energy
inte
ract
ion r
ate
Curves denote different Higgs boson spins; ILC data cleanly discriminate.
supersymmetry
The ILC measures the properties of the Higgs boson – for example, its spin
and its decay fractions into different particles. If these differ from the standard model expectations, the pattern will tell us the nature of the more complex Higgs boson.
ILC, Higgs & SUSY
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
89
The precise ILC neutralino mass measurement allows the LHC to pin down other particle masses much more accurately.
20
mass
neutralino mass
20 mass
error with ILC help
20 mass
error with no ILC help
ILC & SUSY
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
90
Maybe ILC agrees with Planck; then the neutralino is likely the only dark matter particle.
Maybe ILC disagrees with Planck; this would tell us that there are different forms of dark matter.
ILC & Dark Matter
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
91
go here sense whats happening here
forc
e s
trength
energy
ILC, Terascale & Grand Unification