Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Heart failure
Chronic heart failure
25.3.2020
HF=cardiovascular problem No.1
Relatively very common (> 70 yr. 10%
prevalence)
Poor prognosis -
malignant disease: 5 yr mortality= 50%
HF NYHA IV : 1 yr mortality= 50%
Prognosis
...is worse than supposed.
Only 50% live longer than 5 yrs.after onset of
symptoms.
There are no data how they are dyeing:
40% dye suddenly (are in stabilised state),
60% primarily for progressive HF
HF - progressive state with ↑ mortality
↑frequency of acute events with progression of disease → need of frequent
hospitalisations and ↑ risk of death
myocardial damage with acute episodes HF → progression LV dysfunction
Chronic worsening
Mortality
Acute episodes
Disease progression
Function
LV
QoL
Gheorghiade et al.Am J Cardiol 2005;96:11G–17G; Gheorghiade & Pang. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:557–73
Epidemiology
USA: 2-3 millions of patients
SK: cca 40 000
if 2000 pract.physicians, each has cca 20 pac.
Incidence:
In the last 40 yrs is increasing
- populations are elderly
- therapy is improving
HF history
1628 The heart is pump (W Harvey)
1761 Overload leads to heart´s enlargement(GB Morgagni)
1785 Digitalis (W Withering)
1806 Pericardial and valvular description (JN Corvisart)
1819 Stethoscope (R Laennec)
1912 Arterial hypertrophy leads to heart pathol.
(JB Herrick)
1954 US in cardiology (I Edler/H Herz)
Nonpharmacologic approaches...
1785 W Withering
– effets on kidneys
– effect on heart beats
Beginning of pharmacotherapy of HF
Milestones in the time
1920 - mercury diuretics
1958 - thiaside diuretics
1967 – heart transplant (C Barnard)
1975 - blockers (F Waagstein)
1987 - benefit of ACEI (ARB) (K Swedberg)
2015 – dual blockade of RAAS (McMurray)
Increased incidence and prevalence
1) improvement in survival after acute MI2) aging population3) improvement of diagnosis4) improvement of therapy
Congestive heart failure
represents complex clinical syndrome,
characterisied of abnormal LV function and
neurohumoral regulation, connected with effort
intolerance and fluid retention and decreased
chance of longevity.
CHF
Is syndrome based from LV dysfunction for:
a)mechanic overload
b)damaged myocardium (cell loss)
c)combination of both
Congestive heart failure
It is not a disease, but „symptomatic syndrome“,
Cardiac output is unadeqate to metabolic needs of organism
(heart,kidneys,lung,liver,muscles,vessels,brain...)
HF definitions
Is complex of symptoms of fatigue, dyspnea and congescion,
connected with tissue hypoperfusion during exercise and
often with fluid retention.
Primary cause is deterioration of the heart to fill in, or to empty
the LV.
Dysfunction
Systolic dysfunction
disturbed ability of myofibriles to shorten against the load
(i.e. generate the pressure and to empty)
Diastolic dysfunction
Ventricle is unable to accept the blood in the low pressure setting
(i.e. to relax and to fill in)
Filling is slow, uncomplete if compensation increase of pressure in
left atrium occurs
Different mechanical stresses induce dilatation and concentric hypertrophy.
Arnold M. Katz, and Ellis L. Rolett Eur Heart J 2016;37:449-
454
HF– abnormalities of structure and function
Normal heart HF
Muscle weakness
Organ hypoperfusion
Pump failure
Definition (pat.-physiol.)
HF is the state, when the heart is not able to secure
adeqate tissue perfusion
and despite
normal or increased filling pressure
HF
Systolic – Diastolic
LV failure - RV failure
Acute HF – Chronic HF
Pump function of the heart is regulated:
- preload
- contractility
- afterload
- heart rate
-synergism of the heart parts
Preload
load to the left ventricle before beginning of
formation contraction action of systole
Tension in the ventricle wall at the end
of diastole
Frank - Starling mechanism:
...power of contraction during
systole is the greater, the greater
is source lenght of muscle fibers
Contractility
factor, influencing contract ability independently
from diastolic muscle fiber lenght,
but dependently from positive or negative
inotropic effects
Regards of increasing of number of created
actine-myosin connections per unit time,
regards of enhancement of their creation
Afterload
Tension in the wall during systole
Determinants:
– aortic stiffness
- peripheral arteriolar resistance
- blood volume in arterial bed
Frequency increases minute volumewith more frequent emptying of ventricles
-frequency effect
-up to critical value of contractions frequency
-disadvantageous with aortal and mitral sten.
Synergism of actions
- atrias and ventricles
- right and left ventricle
- base, middle and apex
Hemodynamic (edema) model of HF
Disturbance of pump function ventricul.pressure
forward failure backward failure
reduction of renal perfusion venous pressure
fluid elimination disturbed ven.return from kidneys
edema edema
Compensation mechanisms
1) Frank-Starling mechanism
2) Neurohumoral activation (SNS,RAAS)
Hemodynamic overload /Loss of cardiomyocytes
stroke volumeProliferative effect
EpinephrineNorepinephrine
Ang IIEndotellin
Arg.vasopressinAldosterone
RetentionNa+, H2O
Tension of LV wall
Endotelial dysfunction,
atherosclerosis
O2 demands O2 supply
myocardial ischemia,LV remodellation, LV dysfunction
Myocardial hypertrophy/fibrosis
frequency
contractility
Definition - guidelines
1) Symptoms of HF (at rest, or during exersice) +
2) Objective evidence od heart dysfunction
(systolic diastolic) (at rest)
3) Response to the therapy – (improvement)
HF= Symptomatic syndrome
Syndrome of LV dysfunction:
mechanical overload
myocardial abnormalities (cell loss)
combination of both
Sequences
Exact reasons for these organ changes are not known yet, but decreased cardiac output (as a result of inability of the heart to create contraction and relaxation) makes the genesis of HF.
At the beginning several adaptation mechanisms are activated, plasmatic neurohumoral characteristics are changing and to circulation various peptides are releasing (to keep heart´s performance and blood pressure).
Prolonged exposition several organs to alterated „circulatory situation“ leads to organ remodellation and dysfunction.
Sequency of progression
Dysfunctiion LV → activation of RAAS
Growth factors(AgII,ALDO)modul.accumul.collagen
around the cardiomyocytes
accumul.interstitial.collagene ↓density of capillaries
↑diffuse oxygen distance →hypoxia of myocytes
Hypoxia→apoptosis of viable cardiomyocytes.
Chronic HF
progressive disease, during development deteriorates, despite
no clinical events are found (i.e MI, worsened CHD)
Apoptosis (programmed cell death)
with HF development loss of cardiomyocytes
„reactive interstitial fibrosis“ contributes
chronic hypoxia triggers apoptosis
HF causes
(2/3 patients) ischemic
(1/3 patient) nonischemic
hypertension
valvular
cardiomyopathies
anemias
endocrinopathies (thyroid gland)
congenital diseases
Processes, leading to HF
Heart: CHD,HY,CMP,specific myocardial diseases.
Valvular,or endocardial diseases- endocardial fibrosis
Pericardial: constrictive pericarditis
Arrhythmias: brady/tachy manifestations as HF
↑ MV: anemias, thyreotoxicosis, hypovitaminoses B1
Iatrogenic: CAA, AA, NSA
Main symptoms
1. Decreased exercise tolerance
2. Dyspnoe:
exercise d.
ortopnoe
paroxysmal noctirnal d.
3. Fatigue
4. Oedema
Classification
Functional classes NYHA
HF Classification Killip classes
Class I no lung rales and 3rd heart sound
Class II lung rales <50% and/or 3rd sound
Class III lung rales >50% / pulmonary edema
Class IV cardiogenic shock
Laboratory diagnostics
NOR
PRA
Arginine vasopressin
BNP/ANP (NT-proBNP)
Diagnosis
EKG
X-ray
ECHOCG
Exercise tests (6min.walking test)
Natriuretic peptides
States masking and worsening HF,
recommended investigations:
1. Lung diseases:
X-ray,lung functional tests, blood picture (sec.polycytemias)
2. Anemias: blood picture
3. Renal and hepatal diseases:
biochemic exams, urine
4. Reversible myocardial ischemia:
exercise myocardial depicting methods
Guidelines classes
Class I recommended/is indicated
Class II a should be considered
II b may be considered
Class III not recommended
Levels of evidence
Level A from more RCT/metaanalyses
Level B from 1 RCT/more non RCT
Level C consensus/small retrospective
trials/registers
Positive inotropes
Na+/K+-ATP-inhibitors
Vasodilators
Nitrates
Hydralasine
Neurohumoral.blockade
ACE-inhibitors
ARB
Aldosteroneantagonists
blockers
-adrenergic agonists
Diuretics
Loop diuretics
Thiasides
Farmacotherapy
Therapy
ivabradine,NEPI,SGLT2
Positive inotropes
Digitalis
Spironolactone
blockers
Diuretics
ACE-Inhibitors
In HF patients, if increased vagotonus =
better prognosis
ACEI and BB significantly increase vagotonus
and decrease sudden cardiac death.
Farmacotherapy of HF (systolic HF) progresses
decreased mortality
improved functional state
Application of the Health Belief Model in Promotion of Self-
Care in Heart Failure Patients
180 patients with HF
38% do not know, what HF means
40% has no information of weight control meaning
43% has no information of salt restriction in meals
Persistence to the therapy
3 months 6 months 12 months
ACEI 83,6 % 75,3 % 64,5 %
ARB 84,8 % 77,5 % 66,3 %
BB 86,3 % 80,0 % 70,4 %
spironolaktone 76,3 % 65,3 % 50,7 %
Goals of therapy
1. Prevention
a) prevent.of diseases leading to LV dysfunction
b) prevention of progression to HF if dysf.LV pres
2. Morbidity
quality of life
3. Mortality
prolonged survival
Management of HF
Estimation of diagnosis
Diagnosis of present signs: pulmonary edema, dyspnoe, exercise fatigue, peripheral edemas.
Etiology of HF
Comorbidities
Estimation of symptome severity (NYHA)
Estimation of prognosis
Evaluation of possible complications
Education of patient and family
Selection of the appropriate therapy
Monitoring of progression and followed therapy
Goals
If possible estimate and adjust underlying cause
Factors worsening of disease: (hypertension,
arrhythmia, severe anemia...)
Adjust salt overload and water overload in body
Adjust main symptoms: (dyspnea,fatigue)
Improve prognosis
HF with EF – 30 yrs – results from RCT trials: 1986–2001.
John J.J.V. McMurray Eur Heart J 2015;36:3467-3470
HF with EF – 30 yrs – negative results from RCT trials: 1986–2001.
John J.J.V. McMurray Eur Heart J 2015;36:3467-3470
HF with EF – 30 yrs – positive results from RCT trials: 1986–2001.
John J.J.V. McMurray Eur Heart J 2015;36:3467-3470
Non-farmacologic
Patient with severe edema:
rest at bed:
Position with head supported
Aspiration of massive pulmonary exsudate
Fluid restriction (<1 l)
Salt restriction
Out-patient:
Non-salt diet
Regular walks
Farmacologic
Farmakologic treatment
Diuretics
RAAS inhibition (ACEI/ARB)
BB
Aldosterone antagonists
Digoxine
Dopaminergic agents
Antiarrythmics
Oxygen
If inhibition
Dual RAAS inhibition RAAS (ARB+NEPI)
Diuretics
In HF patients there is some Na+H₂0 retention,
therefore: NaCl restriction + diuretics (also none).
Mild forms: thiazides
Severe forms: loop diuretics
Doses such, to normalize.jugulular venous pressure
<8mmHg
In single dose, or doubled (cave ↓K,Mg)
ACEI/ARB
major advance in HF therapy
↓mortality with mild/moderate HF (SOLVD)
with severe HF (CONSENSUS,CHARM)
NYHA IV (yearly mortality from 57% to 26%)
NYHA II (yearly mortality from 40% to 35%)
improves functional status NYHA(40-50% patients of 0,5-1 NYHA)
EBM - ACEI
Captopril (SAVE)
Enalapril (CONSENSUS, SOLVD)
Lisinopril (ATLAS)
Ramipril (AIRE)
Trandolapril (TRACE)
Starting doses - targets (mg)
ACEI
captopril 6,25 (3xd) 50 (3xd)
enalapril 2,5 (2xd) 10-20 (2xd)
lisinopril 2,5-5 (1xd) 20-35 (1xd)
ramipril 2,5 (2xd) 5 (2xd)
trandolapril 0,5 (1xd) 4 (1xd)
Start low – go slow!
ACEI class level
Lowering of hospitalization risk and premature HF mortality
in pat. with EF ≤ 40%, (pats. should be on BB and MRA).
I. A
For lowering of hospitalization risk in HF pat. with EF ≤
40%, and persistent symptoms (NYHA II.-IV.) despite th.
BB, not tolerating MRA.
I. A
ACEI – symptomatic HF( NYHA II.-IV.)
ESC Guidelines for nthe diagnossis et treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 European Heart Journal 2012. 1787-1847
Starting doses – targets (mg)
ARB
candesartan 4-8 (1xd) 32 (1xd)
valsartan 40 (2xd) 160 (2xd)
losartan 50 (1xd) 150 (1xd)
ARB class level
Lowering of hospitalization risk and premature HF mortality
in pat. with EF ≤ 40%, not tolerating ACEI (cough)
(pat should be on BB and MRA).
I. A
For lowering of hospitalization risk in HF pat. with EF ≤
40%, and persistent symptoms (NYHA II.-IV.) despite th.
ACEI and BB, not tolerating MRA.
I. A
ARBs – symptomatic HF( NYHA II.-IV.)
ESC Guidelines for nthe diagnossis et treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 European Heart Journal 2012. 1787-1847
EBM - BB
Carvedilol (COPERNICUS,US-CARVEDIL)
Bisoprolol (CIBIS II)
Metoprolol (MERIT-HF)
Nebivolol (SENIORS)
(COMET): metoprolol, carvedilol
Starting doses - targets(mg)
BB
bisoprolol 1,25 (1xd) 10 (1xd)
carvedilol 3,125 (2xd) 25-50 (2xd)
metoprolol succinate 12,5-25 (1xd) 200 (1xd)
nebivolol 1,25 (1xd) 10 (1xd)
EBM - MRA
Spironolactone (RALES)
Eplerenone (EPHESUS, EMPHASIS-HF)
Starting doses – targets (mg)
MRA
eplerenone 25 (1xd) 50 (1xd)
spironolactone 25 (1xd) 25-50 (1xd)
MRA class level
For all pat.with persistent symptomsNYHA II-IV
and EF ≤ 35% despite therapy with ACEI (ARB)
and BB for lowering of HF hospitalization
and premature mortality risk.
I. A.
MRA - symptomatic (HF) (NYHA II.-IV.)
ESC Guidelines for nthe diagnossis et treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 European Heart Journal 2012. 1787-1847
class level
ACEi I A
ARB I A
BB I A
MRA I A
Pharmacological treatment for
symptomatic systolic HF (NYHA II.-IV.)
ESC Guidelines for the diagnossis et treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 European Heart Journal 2012. 1787-1847
Digoxin
HF with atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response
Improves performance and eases straits (quality of life)
Doesn´t improve survival.
Usually in severe forms of HF.
Carefully, event.: discontinuation of therapy.
Renal.insuff,arrhythmias with conduction abnormalities,
hypokalemia!
Therapeutic serum concentrations: digoxinemia: 0,9-1,9 μM/l
(in HF 0,7-1,5)
Digoxin in NYHA II.-IV with systolic HF.
ESC Guidelines for nthe diagnossis et treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 European Heart Journal 2012. 1787-1847
Digoxin class level
For lowering of hospitalization risk HF in pat. with EF ≤ 45% and
AF, not tolerating BB (in pat. with HR ≥ 70/min = alternative is
ivabradín).
Pat. Should be on ACEI (or ARB) and MRA.
II.b B
For lowering of hospitalization risk HF pat. with EF ≤ 45%
and persistent symptoms (NYHA II.-IV.), despite therapy of BB,
ACEI (or ARB) and MRA.
II.b. B.
Ivabradin
lowers hospitalization risk for HF in pat. on sinus rhythm and EF ≤
35% where HR ≥ 70/min and symptoms (NYHA II.-IV.) despite
BB, ACEI (or ARB) and MRA.
II.a. B
May be to lower hospitalization risk for HF in patients on sinus
rhythm and EF ≤ 35% with HR ≥ 70/min, in BB intoleration.
Patients should be on ACEI(or ARB) and MRA.
II.b. B
Ivabradine NYHA II.-IV with systolic HF.
ESC Guidelines for nthe diagnossis et treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 European Heart Journal 2012. 1787-1847
Other drugs (NYHA II.-IV.) systolic HF.
Hydralazin and Izosorbiddinitrate (H-ISDN) class level
As alternative for ACEI or ARB, if not netolerated, for
lowering of hospitalization risk of HF and lowering of
premature mortality risk in patients with EF ≤ 45% and LV
dilatation (or EF ≤ 35%). Patients should be on both BB
and MRA.
II. B
For lowering of hospitalization risk and premature mortality
of HF SZ with EF ≤ 45% and LV dilatation (or EF ≤ 35%)
with persistent symptoms (NYHA II.-IV.) despite BB, ACEI
(or ARB) and MRA.
II. B.
ESC Guidelines for nthe diagnossis et treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 European Heart Journal 2012. 1787-1847
Farmakologic principles in HF:
SNS
RAAS
VazoconstrictionBlood pressurek
SympaticusAldosteroneHypertrophy
Fibrosis
Ang II AT1R
SYMPTOMS and
PROGRESSION HF
INACTÍVE
FRAGMENTs
NP system
VazodilatationBlood pressureSympaticusNatriuresis/diuresisVasopressineAldosteroneFibrosisHypertrophy
NPRs NPs
Epinephrin
Norepinephrineα1, β1, β2
receptors
VasoconstrictionRAAS activityVasopressine
Heart rate Contractility
Neprilysine
inhibítors
RAAS inhibitors
(ACEI, ARB, MRA)
β-blockers
A
Heart is an endocrinne organ, releasing natriuretic peptides as the
reaction to mechanic stress, with partially counteracts RAAS
Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP)
Expression from atrias
Measured in plasma
NH2
COOH-
Vazodilatation
↑ Diuresis/natriuresis
↓ Proliferation
↓ Hypertrophy
↓ Aldosterone
↓ SNS
↓ CO preload
↑ Venous capacity
C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP)
Expressed in vascular endothelial
cells and central nervous system
Not detectable in plasma – primarily
synthesized in vasculature, acting
locally in tissues
NH2
COOH-
Vasodilatation
greater dilatation of veins, than ANP+
BNP
↓ Proliferation
Regulation of bome growthi
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)
Expression from atrias and
ventricles
Meased in plasma
NH2
COOH-
Vasodilatation
↑ Diuresis/natriuresis
↓ Aldosterone
↓ SNS
Vasodilatation
BP
SNS
Aldosterone
Fibrosis
Hypertrophy
Natriuresis/diuresis
Inactive
fragments
ANP, CNP, +other
vasoactive peptids
AT1 Receptor
Vasoconstriction
Blood pressure
Sympathetic tone
Aldosterone
Fibrosis
Hypertrophy
Angiotensinogen
(secrétion in
liver)
Ang I
Ang II
RAAS
Dual RAAS inhibition (ARB+NEPI)
Entresto
Sacubitril pro-drug
Inhibiting
zvýšenie
(NEP inhibitor)
OH
OHN
O
HO
O
Valsartan
N
NHN
N
N
O
OH
O
Entresto - first drug angiotensine receptor
neprilysine inhibitors (ARNI)
Entresto new treatment modality
simultanneous neprilysine inhibition
+ AT1 receptor blockade
Complex of two components:
– sacubitril – a pro-drug; metabolized to
neprilysine inhibítor and
– valsartan – AT1 receptor blocker
Ratio: 1:1 L
Symptoms Survival
Diuretics +++ -
ACEI/ARB ++ ++
BB + +
Digoxin + -
Antag.aldosterone ++ +
Amiodarone +- +-
Ivabradine + +
ARB+NEPI ++ ++
Oxygen + -
NEPI(Entresto) + +
SGLT2 inhibitors + +
Therapy algorithm
diuretics (improve symptoms and signs of congestion)
+
ACEI (ARB if ACEI intolerance)
adding BB
adding MRA
adding ivabradine
dual RAAS inhibition (ARB+NEPI)
other therapy (RSCH,ICD)
vazodilatation (H+ISDN) + digitalis
Tx
Pharmacokinetics of drugs
absorbtion
central compartment peripheral compartment
metabolism excretion
Pharmacokinetics od HF drugs
gut dysfunction absorbtion decreased distribution volume
central compartment peripheral compartment
metabolism excretion
liver dysfunction renal dysfunction
Farmacokinetics of HF
distribution volume
clearence
plasmatic drug concentrations in HF , than among
healthy → lowering of loading and maintenance
doses, longer time is needed for steady-state
reaching → slower drug titration
HF and RI are present together, have
common underlying causes (age, hyper-
tension, DM, atherosclerosis, comorbidi-
ties…) and as for disease of one organ
may lead to the dysfunction of other.
RI in HF is common.
Cave: limits effective drug doses usage.
Excessive diuresis - very common cause of RI in HF
For good control of edemas accept worsening of RI.
Clinical approach
chronic HF
+
cardiac cachexia
change in pfarmacokinetics of CV drugs
reevaluation of doses, but always in the context to clinical state
Chronic HF and cachexia
cachexia (3 from 5):
Weight loss at least decreased muscle strenght
5% of 12 months, fatigue, anorexia
or less index of free fat mass
(or BMI < 20kg/m²) abnormal biochemistry:
inflamm.marker.(CRP,IL-6)
anemia (Hb<12g/dl)
albuminemia(<3,2g/dl)
Evans: Cachexia-new definition. Clin Nutr.2008:27:793-799
Most common causes of HF worsening
Noncardial:
(noncompliance to therapy: salt, water, drugs)
Adverse effects of new prescribed drugs: (NSA,verapamil,AA)
Alcohol abuse
Renal dysfunction (excess of diuretics)
Infection
Pulmonary embolisation
Thyroid gland dysfunction (amiodarone)
Anemia (occult bleeding)
Cardial:
Atrial fibrillation
Other SV and V arrythmias
Bradycardia
Mitral/tricuspidal insufficiency (new, progressive, old)
Myocardial ischemia (often asymptomatic), incl. myocardial infarction
Excessive decrease of afterload (diuretics+ACEI)
Therapy of refractory HF
difficult, risky, cardiologist consider Tx
If volume overload:
FUR up to 480mg/d, direct salt restriction, iv, if N ren.ff spironolaktone carefully, during hospitalisation .iv dobutamine.
If exercise dyspnea:
+ hydralasine/nitrates, if lung congestion,↓BP nitrates
Hunt for states, worsening HF
+ revascularization
Surgery
Revascularisation and other cardiosurgery
Implantation of pacemaker/ICD
Ultrafiltration and hemodialysis
Resynchronic therapy
Supportive systems
Heart transplant
Complications
Arrythmias (myocardial,valvular,pericardial dis.)
Deep vein thrombosis (vein sthasis)
Tromboembolias (intracardiac thrombosis)
Vital organ failure (hypoxia)
Sudden cardiac death (malignant ventricular
arythmias)
Acute HF
It is the clinical syndrome with low minute volume,
tissue hypoperfusion, increased pulmonary
pressure and stasis in the tissues.
Acute heart failure
Evaluation of clinical manifestation
suddenly developed at rest
Evidence of myocardial dysfunction
disturbance of the function of the heart at rest
Response to treatment (if dg is questionable)
Suspicion of ac.heart failure
↓
ECG, X-ray (heart and lung)
↙ ↘
BNP/NT-pro BNP EchoCG
↙ ↘ ↓
ECG normal+ ECG abnormal+
NT-proBNP˂300 pg/ml NT-proBNP≥ 300pg/ml
BNP˂100pg/ml BNP≥100pg/ml
(HF not proved) if confirmed,
find ethiology
Clinical fenotypes of AHF
A. Ak.dekomp.HF (new,superponed on CHF)
B. Hypertension crisis with HF
C. Pulmonary oedema
D. Cardiogenic shock
E. HF with↑cardiac output (A,tyreotox.,sepsis)
F. Right HF with ↓minute volume
Clinical classification (Killip)
A. Without heart failure and sthasis
B. Failure with 3 heart sound,lung rales (lower 1/2)
C. Severe failure, lung rales above all lungs
D. Cardiogenic shock with hypotension, periferal
vasoconstriction, oligo/anuria, cyanosis
Clinical classification (Forrester)
A. Dry and warm (without congescion, hypoperfus.)
B. Wet and warm (with congestion and a.perfusion)
C. Wet and cold (with congesc.and hypoperfusion)
D. Dry and cold (with hypoperf., without congesc.)
AHF
Conditions of successful therapy of AHF is the
reversibility of disturbed myocardial function.
Liver tests
acute HF chronic HF
ALT ++
AST ++
AP
GMT ?
Bi celk
Albumine
Prognosis of AHF
Hospital mortality de novo AHF = 12%
decompensated CHF = 10%
Management of AHF
A. Symptom releaf
B. Hypervolemia reduction
C. Improvement of hemodynamics
D. Retention of perfusion of vital organs
Management of AHF
Primary care before hospitalisation
A. Posture of the patient (sitting, running legs)
B. Loading of turnstiles on the limbs
C. Oxygen
D. NTG s.l.
E. Bolus of furosemide
F. Sedatives if needed
G. Digoxin (atrial tachyfibrillation)
Management AHF
Hospital care
congestion
no yes
no warm and dry warm and wet
hypoperfusion diuretics
yes cold and dry cold and wet vazoD
inotropes ultrafiltration
mechanic circulation support
Perspective drugs for AHF
urodilatine
omecantiv mecarbil
cinaciquat
serelaxine