Click here to load reader
Upload
maria-mercedes-leiva
View
24
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
annotated biblio
Citation preview
Herlihy-Mera, Jeffrey. "When Hemingway hated Paris:
divorce proceedings, contemplations of suicide, and
the deleted chapters of the sun also rises." Studies in
the Novel 44.1 (2012): 49+. Literature Resource
Center. Web. 14 Sept. 2013.
This critical essay explains how literary
expatriation plays an essential part in Hemingway’s
growth as a writer. The author tries to compile
several factors that contributed to Hemingway’s
depression, alcoholism, and thoughts of suicide after
he had to move to Paris. It also analyzed how
Hemingway progressed from loving Paris, to hating it
at the end of his expatriation. The article “Christmas
on the Roof of the World" is used to proof
Hemingway distress. Herlihy-Mera, also described an
incident were all the manuscripts composed by
Hemingway since childhood were stolen from a train
in Paris, including what was going to be his first
novel. This essay gives a good insight to understand
how expatriation affected Hemingway’s life and
literary work.
Hicks, Granville. "Hemingway: The Complexities That
Animated the Man." Saturday Review of Literature
52.16 (19 Apr. 1969): 31-33. Rpt. in Twentieth-
Century Literary Criticism. Ed. Janet Witalec. Vol.
119. Detroit: Gale, 2002. Literature Resource Center.
Web. 14 Sept. 2013.
In this review, Granville recognized how Carlos
Baker's biography of Ernest Hemingway: A Life Story
was the most important writing out seven other
books that were published about the famous writer.
The work was supported and approved by
Hemingway’s widow and literary executor. She
allows the biographer to inspect any of Hemingway’s
documents, including unpublished manuscripts and
letters.
Panda, Ken. "Under Kilimanjaro: the multicultural
Hemingway." The Hemingway Review 25.2 (2006):
128+. Literature Resource Center. Web. 15 Sept.
2013.
This article offer information about one of the
latest Hemingway published book “Under
Kilimanjaro”. Ken announces that readers are not
aware that Hemingway did not write the book. He
also states the book is an edition of a manuscript
found in a safe deposit box left in Cuba. This article
recognized Hemingway as a multicultural writer, who
lived in four different countries and also traveled all
over the world. This review offers important details
about Hemingway’s latest work to the general
audience.
Strychacz, Thomas. "Unraveling the Masculine Ethos in
'The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber.'."
Hemingway's Theaters of Masculinity. Baton Rouge:
Louisiana State University Press, 2003. 14-52. Rpt. in
Short Story Criticism. Ed. Jelena O. Krstovic. Vol. 137.
Detroit: Gale, 2010. Literature Resource Center. Web.
15 Sept. 2013.
This literature criticism article mainly explains how
Hemingway’s story "The Short Happy Life of Francis
Macomber", does not represent his typical illustration
of character’s masculinity. This article also analyses
how the ambiguity of the final act has contributed to
the story status as an enduring classic postwar
American literature. Strychacz discussed the plot,
major characters and major theme of the story. The
author also mentioned the critical reception of the
story by scholars, critics and reviewers. This article
summarizes "The Short Happy Life of Francis
Macomber” and explains how the writer used the
contrast between two different types of masculinity
through the characters of Francis and Wilson.
"The Influence of Ernest Hemingway." Twentieth-Century
Literary Criticism. Ed. Thomas J. Schoenberg and
Lawrence J. Trudeau. Vol. 162. Detroit: Thomson
Gale, 2005. 122-259. Literature Criticism Online.
Gale. 15 September 2013.
This work is a compilation of different critic’s
essays about Hemingway literary work. Linda
Wagner-Martin, the editor Ernest Hemingway:
Seven Decades of Criticism, noted that over the
past seventy years, as views of heroism have
changed, so too have critics' views of Hemingway
(123). Biographer Michael Reynolds noted that even
when “Hemingway’s short fiction is what changed
American fiction,” and particularly the way
subsequent authors wrote dialogue, “there are
people who venerate Hemingway who have never
read Hemingway” (122). This criticism work is a
precise analysis of a variety of Hemingway critics
reviews over the past seventy years.