Upload
bathsheba-hines
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Helen CainesYale University
18th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics – Nassau, Bahamas Jan 2002
A Strange Perspective –
Spectra
If we knew what we were doing it would not be called research, would it? - A. Einstein
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Spectra – What to look at
mt spectral shapes
Shape change as function of centrality
Species shape dependence
•Is there evidence of re-scattering?
•Enough to thermalise?
• If so for all centralities?
•Do particles freeze-out at the same temperature?
•Is there any dependence on centrality?
•How long does rescattering phase last?
•What about simpler systems? Compare to p+p
Short lived resonances
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Particle identification
Approx. 10% of a central event
V0
K0
p
p
and by extension
K
Kink
K
a) dE/dxc) Topology
K p d
e
b) Resonances
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Data Quality 1: Resonances
Mass and width are consistent with PDG book convoluted with TPC resolution
K*
K*_
STAR Preliminary
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Data Quality 2: Peaks~0.84 /ev, ~ 0.61/ev
_
_ ~0.006 /ev, ~0.005/ev
~1.6 s/ev
6e-4 /ev , 6e-4~+/ev
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Data Quality 3: Lifetime check
K0s
Lifetime : 8.03 ±0.05 (stat)cm
PDG Value : 7.89 cm
Lifetime : 2.64 ±0.01(stat)cm
PDG Value : 2.68 cm
Star PreliminaryStar Preliminary
Get pt shape of correction factors correct
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Data quality 4: Kaon Comparison
STAR Preliminary
3 different methods with 3 drastically different efficiencies get same Slope and yield
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Comparison of h- and , pT dist.
STAR Preliminary
Suggestive that the ratio baryons/mesons > 1 at high pT
Consequence of radial flow ?
or novel baryon dynamics ?Vitev and Gyulassy nucl-th/0104066
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Kinetic Freeze-out and Radial Flow
If there is transverse flow
Look at mt = (pt2 + m2 )
distributionA thermal distribution gives a linear distribution
dN/dmt mte-(mt/T)
mt
1/m
t d2N
/dyd
mt
Slope = 1/T
Slope = 1/Tmeas
~ 1/(Tfo+ mo<vt>2)
Want to look at how energy distributed in system.
Look in transverse direction so not confused by longitudinal expansion
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Mass dependence in p+p?
At lower energy (s=23 GeV) p+p collisions all particle species exhibit same inverse slope
Deviation of this behaviour in A+A attributed to flow
NA44-
Phys. Rev. Lett (78) 1997 2080
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
K0s m Spectra
Centrality % T (MeV)
0-5 289 ± 3 ± 17
5-10 291 ± 3 ± 17
10-20 286 ± 5 ± 17
20-35 278 ± 4 ± 17
35-75 269 ± 4 ± 16
Spectra well reproduced by an exponential
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
T=300-350 MeV
Note spectra are not feed-down corrected
mt Spectra
|y|<0.5
Centrality % T (MeV)
0-5 342 ± 9 ± 20
5-10 336 ± 9 ± 20
10-20 328 ± 7 ± 20
20-35 331 ± 8 ± 20
35-75 295 ± 7 ± 19
Fits are e(-mt/T)
See the same results (within errors) for
Spectra slightly better fit by a Boltzmann
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Inverse slope for and
_
STAR Preliminary
0-14%
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Mass dependence of mT slopes
Indication of strong radial flow at RHIC
Situation appears to be more complicated at RHIC than at the SPS
Note: inverse slope depends on the measured pT range(dE/dx p < 1 GeV/c)
1/m
T d
N/d
mT
(a.u
.)mT-m
STAR Preliminary
Multi-strange baryon seems to have early freeze-out
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
mT dist. from Hydrodynamic type model
)0 ,sinh ,(cosh )0,,( rezrtu
tanh 1r )( rfsr R
s
Ref. : E.Schnedermann et al, PRC48 (1993) 2462
flow profile selected
(r =s (r/Rmax)0.5)mmT
1/m
T d
N/d
mT
(a.u
.)
K
p
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
explosive radial expansion at RHIC high pressure
ßr (RHIC) = 0.52c Tfo (RHIC) = 0.13 GeV
K-p
-
<r > [c]
Tth [
GeV
]
0 0.40 0.4<r > [c]
Tth [
GeV
]
Fits to the hydro. model
mT - m [GeV/c2]
1/m
T d
N/d
mT
(a
.u.)
-
K-
p
solid : used for fit
STAR Preliminary
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Tth and <r> systematic
• <r>– saturates around AGS
energy– increased at RHIC?
• Tth– saturates around AGS
energy
STA
R
PHE
NIX
Tth
[GeV
]<
r>
[c]
Picture for central collisions - lots of rescattering and flow
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
mT slopes vs. Centrality
Common T at most peripheral collisions?
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
mt in p+p at high s
Dumitru, Spieles –Phy. Lett. B 446 1999
NOT flow as Hydro calc. shows.
Pythia –Confirmed by UA1/5 experiments at 540 GeVshows strong mass dependence
Due to mini jets – create
colour strings that are not ONLY
longitudinal.
Want to look in more detail at 200 GeV
More complicated picture at high s – How to disentangle
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
p+p, STAR and Strangeness
Data is from ~1/10th of that taken
Should get nice spectra
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
How long does rescattering last?
10 100 s GeV
From spin counting
K*/K = vector mes/mes
= V/(V+P)
= 0.75
See lower ratio at RHIC than in elementary collisions
Due to re-scattering of daughters?
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
K* Slope
STAR Preliminary
MT-M0 (GeV/c2)
Statistical error only
Central events
(top 14%)
K*0
T ~ 400 MeV
Similar to that of and (same mass)
No evidence of a low pt
suppression
Must be short time scale from chemical freeze-out to thermal
OR long lifetime with lots of regeneration.
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
Getting the time scale and temp
G. Torrieri and J. Rafelski, hep-ph/0103149
Can be hot and long lived or cooler and short timescales to get same ratio.
Measure more than one resonance and can pin down T and t
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
What to look at - Conclusion
mt suggest thermalization has
occurred
Flow decreases with decreasing centrality
Yes but with a large flow. Not seen as strongly by
strange particles
•Is there evidence of re-scattering?
•Enough to thermalise?
• If so for all centralities?
•Do particles freeze-out at the same temperature?
•Is there any dependence on centrality?
•How long does re-scattering phase last?
•What about simpler systems?
comparison to p+p data harder at this
energy
Elastic re-scattering phase short
Helen Caines
Jan 2002
The STAR CollaborationRussia:MEPHI - MoscowLPP/LHE JINR - DubnaIHEP - Protvino
U.S. Labs:ArgonneBerkeleyBrookhaven
U.S. Universities: Arkansas UniversityUC BerkeleyUC DavisUC Los AngelesCarnegie Mellon UniversityCreighton UniversityIndiana UniversityKent State UniversityMichigan State UniversityCity College of New YorkOhio State UniversityPenn. State UniversityPurdue UniversityRice UniversityTexas A&MUT AustinWashington UniversityWayne State UniversityYale University
Brazil: Universidade de Sao Paolo
China: IHEP - BeijingIPP - Wuhan
England: University of Birmingham
France:IReS StrasbourgSUBATECH - Nantes
Germany: MPI – MunichUniversity of Frankfurt
India:IOP - BhubaneswarVECC - CalcuttaPanjab UniversityUniversity of RajasthanJammu UniversityIIT - Bombay
Poland:Warsaw University of Technology