Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    1/39

    HEART RHYTHM OBSERVED DURING

    POSITIVE HEAD-UP

    TILT TESTIN VASOVAGAL SYNCOPE (VVS)

    Radu Rosu, MD

    ISHNE 2013, Timisoara

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    2/39

    BACKGROUND

    Syncopeis a T-LOC due to transient globalcerebral hypoperfusion characterized by rapidonset, short duration, and spontaneous

    complete recovery. Reflex syncope- cardiovascular reflexes

    become intermittently inapropriate, in responseto a trigger, resulting in vasodilatation and/orbradycardia

    Vasovagal syncope (VVS)- is mediated byemotion or by orthostatic stress.

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    3/39

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    4/39

    Vasovagal syncope

    Vasovagal syncope is a common disorder

    which accounts for 8% to 37% of syncopes.

    Most patients experience infrequent faints

    and seldom require more than counseling

    and reassurance.

    Patients with frequent and/or unpredictable

    syncope, however, can be severely disabledand require therapy.

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    5/39

    Reflex syncope is the most frequent cause of

    syncope in any setting

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    6/39

    Head-Up Tilt Test (HUT)

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    7/39

    Tilt Test indications

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    8/39

    Tilt testing positive responses

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    9/39

    OBJECTIVES:

    Heart rhythm obtained during provocative

    condition is often used to guide therapy in

    vasovagal syncope (VVS).

    The aim of this study was to analyze the

    heart rhythm during positive head-up tilt test(HUT) in VVS.

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    10/39

    METHODS:

    Retrospective observational study

    32 consecutive patients presenting witha history VVS performed HUT in our

    cardiology department.

    December 2011 - May 2012.

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    11/39

    Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

    Characteristics Included

    Clinical history consistent with VVS YES

    Low risk patients with severe simptoms or

    their occurrence in high-risk settings

    YES

    1 syncope YES

    Age 18 years YES

    Non-syncopal loss of consciousness NO

    Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension NO

    Cardiac abnormalities which suggested

    cardiac syncope

    NO

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    12/39

    Tilt Test protocol

    pre-tiltphase

    5 minutes or 20 minutes if venouscannulation was undertaken

    pasivephase

    40 minutes

    activephase

    400 mcg of sublingual nitroglycerine

    20 minutes

    Continuous ECG and intermitent bloodpressure monitoring during the phases

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    13/39

    Tilt table test

    The HUT was considered positive when

    the patient developed syncope or

    intolerable presyncope.

    All patients were in sinus rhythm, free of

    antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    14/39

    RESULTS:

    Patients Characteristics

    Characteristics

    Age, yrs 49,36,8

    Gender ratio (male/female) 16/16

    History of syncope

    Number of syncopes 20,16

    Prodrome(%) 80

    History of trauma(%) 33,3

    ECG 1 patient with RBB without

    Brugada pattern

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    15/39

    RESULTS:

    32 patients

    Junctionalrhythm

    8

    Sinus rhythm

    10

    Asystole

    6

    Tachycardia

    2

    6 negtive Tilt

    testexcluded

    26 patients

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    16/39

    RESULTS:Tilt Test events

    Total end-points: 26

    Asystole23%

    Junctionalrhythm>40/min

    15%Junctional

    rhythm

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    17/39

    Gender-Rhythm types

    no significant difference

    p-value=0,62

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    Male Female

    Asytole

    Tachycardia

    Jonctional rhythm

    Synus rhythm

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    18/39

    Age-rhythm

    no significant difference

    rhythm Total

    Asystole Junctionalrhythm Sinusrhythm Tachycardia

    Age 40 Count 5 4 8 1 18

    Total 6 8 10 2 26

    p-value=0,41

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    19/39

    Gender-active phase vs pasive phase

    no significant difference

    p-value=0,23

    0

    12

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Pasive phase Active phase

    Female

    Male

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    20/39

    Tilt test responses:

    Type of response Number of patients

    1 Mixt 13 (50%)

    2A Cardioinhibition without asystole 4 (15,3%)

    2B Cardioinhibition with asystole 6 (23%)

    3 Vasodepressor 3 (11,7%)

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    21/39

    Gender-type of response

    Type of

    response

    Gender Total

    Male Female

    1 9 4 13

    2A 1 3 4

    2B 2 4 6

    3 1 2 3

    Total 13 13 26

    p-value=0,27

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    22/39

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    23/39

    Gender-Syncope/Presyncope

    Gender Total

    Male Female

    Presyncope 1 2 3

    Syncope 12 11 23

    Total 13 13 26

    p-value=0,539

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    24/39

    Age-Syncope/Presyncope

    Age Total40

    Presyncope 0 3 3

    Syncope 8 15 23

    Total 8 18 26

    p-value=0,22

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    25/39

    Jonctional bradicardia 47 beats/min

    in a 23 year old female,

    SBP

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    26/39

    Sinus rhythm 67/min in a 56 year old male

    SBP

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    27/39

    Sinus tachycardia 114 beats/min

    in a 18 year old male

    SBP

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    28/39

    Asystole

    mean age Male- 504 yrs

    Female- 485,3yrs

    Prolonged asystole in men (mean=13,47,8s)

    vs female (5,50,8s)

    2 patients with asystole of 18s and respectively

    45s beneficiated from pacemaker implantation.

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    29/39

    Asystole of 5,7s in 49 year old female

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    30/39

    Asystole of 45s

    in 58 year old male

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    31/39

    Test-related incidents:

    1 patient with 45s asystole was placed inthe supine position and cardiac massage

    was started, 2 mg atropine has been given.

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    32/39

    Discussion

    A weak correlation

    was found between the responses

    to Tilt testing and the

    mechanism of spontaneous

    neurally mediated syncope .

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    33/39

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    34/39

    Asystolic syncope 3 s, or

    Non-syncopal asystole 6 s

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    35/39

    We know from ILR experience that about half ofspontaneous neurally mediated episodes are

    asystolic in nature.

    The induction of an asystolic NMS during tilt tabletesting can predict the efficacy of pacemaker

    therapy albeit to a lesser extent than thatexpected (ISSUE-3).

    The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial(SyNPACE) had shown that the time to firstsyncope recurrence was longer in an asystolicventricular pause of 13 8 s response during tilttable testing in paced patients.

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    36/39

    Cardiac pacing should be the last choice in

    highly selected patients affected by severe

    NMS.

    Other therapies, eg, physical counterpres-sure maneuvers, are more desirable in young

    patients.

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    37/39

    CONCLUSIONS:

    The heart rhythm observed during positiveHUT is sinus rhythm and in induced syncopeis most of the time junctional rhytm.

    Some patients still present syncope with sinustachycardia and severe blood pressurediminuation.

    Prolonged asystole can be the rhythmresponsible for syncope.In this case thepatient can beneficiate from pacemakerimplantation.

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    38/39

    Tilt Test is:

    noninvasive

    providing an immediate diagnosis

    hampered by a significant risk of misdiagnosis

    some patients can beneficiate from pacemaker

    implantation

    others can be reassured.

  • 8/13/2019 Heart Rhythm Observed During Positive Head-Up Final

    39/39

    Thank you for your attention!