Upload
lmk1970
View
402
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation on HAVS assessment and management
Citation preview
•Lucy Kenyon•OH Manager
Hand-arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS) is an all-encompassing term to describe the signs and symptoms of disorder caused by vibration
HAVS consists of three components Vascular Neurological Musculo-skeletal
Each component may occur independently
VWF (PD A11) in April 1985 1992 minimum of 14% disability
introduced for entitlement Currently, neurological and musculo-
skeletal components cannot be compensated despite objections in 1995 from the IIAC
Number of claims larger than for noise-induced hearing loss
“I don’t go out much in the cold now” “I can only hold things in the kitchen
for short periods” “When I left mining, I wanted to take
up bowls, but couldn’t roll the ball very far”
“My wife has to cut up my food” “I can’t shave very quickly anymore” “I can still just manage to turn the
pages of a newspaper”
Very rare & severe cases
Consider other preexisting conditions such as scleroderma
Latency neurosensory symptoms vascular symptoms
Individual susceptibility? Pre-existing primary or secondary RP Pre-existing peripheral
neuropathies/entrapments Smoking (unproven) Age/Gender (unproven)
After cessation or reduction in vibration exposure, the vascular symptoms of HAVS and staging show some reversibility
May be less reversible at higher stages Smoking may hinder reversibility of
vascular symptoms Neurological symptoms are less
reversible
4,800,000 exposed to HAV at work >1.2m exposed above current HSE action
level of 2.8 m/s2 A(8) nearly 500,000 in construction industry highest exposures in heavy fabrication, foundry
fettlers, stone masons about 1.7 million exposed above new EAV nearly 1 million exposed above new ELV
Minimise the number of new cases of HAVS
Ensure existing cases do not progress to disabling stage (late stage 2)
Concentrate on the highest exposures first
When? risk assessment shows the need exposure action value exceeded
Employer’s control/management system
Feedback on effectiveness of controls particularly important for HAV because
absence of effective PPE means continued exposure and risk
Agreed policy Competent health professionals Well informed employees
Need for detailed worker information HSE/BOHRF leaflet
Vibration is measured in three axes The three axes of measurement are:
Who exposed and to what processes Description of tools, work pieces, methods etc. Vibration control methods adopted Estimations of daily exposures (w.r.t EAV, ELV) Sources of data Details of actions Any other data, assessors name and date Date of repeat assessment
Exposure log Current medication or prescriptions
Responsible person Qualified person FOM accredited practitioner
Level 3 F2F Assessment (P/E, 3 yearly and presentation of symptoms)
Level 2 Annual HQ - Routine Screening by OHA
Level 4 Diagnosis by FOM accredited practitioner
Level 5 Standardised Tests
Level 1 – NOT USED PEHQ reviewed by resonsible person
Handshake Is the person’s hand clammy and/or cold? Note the strength of the grip…
Upper limb movements Do they appear unrestricted? Are they freely moving their neck and
shoulders?
Some neurological symptoms (tingling/numbness) occur very often in most people following acute exposure E.g. Strimming the lawn
Important to ensure no exposure to vibration for at least 2 hours before assessment (temporary shift)
Dexterity Purdue Pegboard
Sensorineural Tests Semmes Weinstein monofilaments Vibrotactile perception thresholds (VTT,
vibrotactile temperature thresholds) Thermal perception thresholds (TA, thermal
aesthesiometry)
LeftRight
• Useful to mark reported symptom areas
• Overlay with test/physical examination outcomes
• May help in clarifying ‘classical’ HAVS from other problems which may or not be associated with vibrationPalmar hand map marked with sensory
deficit in ulnar nerve distribution, similar pattern on dorsal surface may indicate ulnar nerve entrapment in Guyon’s canal.
STAGE CRITERIA
0 v No attacks
1 v Attacks affecting only the tips of the distal phalanges of one or more fingers – usually a blanching score of 1 - 4
2 v(early)
Occasional attacks of whiteness affecting the distal and middle (rarely also the proximal) phalanges of one or more fingers – usually a blanching score of 5 - 9
2 v(late)
Frequent attacks of whiteness affecting the distal and middle (rarely also proximal) phalanges of one or more fingers - usually a blanching score of 10 -16
3 v Frequent attacks of whiteness affecting all of the phalanges of most of the fingers all year – usually a blanching score of 18 or more
4 v As 3v and trophic changes
STAGE CRITERIA
0 sn Vibration exposure but no symptoms
1 sn Intermittent numbness and/or tingling (with a sensorineural,sn score of > 3 and < 6)
2 sn (early)
Intermittent numbness, and/or tingling, reduced sensory perception (usually an sn score of > 6 < 9)
2 sn(late)
Persistent numbness, and/or tingling, reduced sensory perception (usually an sn score of > 9 < 16)
3 sn Constant numbness and/or tingling, reduced sensory perception and manipulative dexterity in warmth (and an sn score > 19)
Intermittent- not persistent; persistent-lasting> 2hoursOccasional attacks= 3 or less per weekFrequent attacks=more than 3 per week
Review exposure and risk assessment Reduce exposure Advise the individual Advise the employer about fitness, (and
diagnosis, if consent given) Set a review date for health surveillance
…to prevent a serious form of HAVS developing and in particular to avoid disability.
No cases to progress to stage 3 Removal from exposure within the gamut
of stage 2
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Primary Raynaud’s
Stockholm scale is key, but not definitive Staging/scoring allows monitoring of the
progression/regression of HAVS Requirement for good medical interview
from physician/nurse with support from clinical assessment and testing
Classification of HAVS is largely an exclusory diagnosis