View
222
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Harvard - MURI
Allan R. Robinson, Pierre F.J. Lermusiaux,
Patrick J. Haley and Wayne G. Leslie
Division of Engineering andApplied Sciences
Department of Earth andPlanetary Sciences
Table of Contents1. Top three tasks to carry out/problems to address2. What we need most?3. Recent results relevant to MURI effort
• Quantitative Autonomous Adaptive Sampling • Multi-Scale Energy and Vorticity Analysis• Multi-Model Adaptive Combination
http://www.deas.harvard.edu/~robinsonhttp://www.deas.harvard.edu/~pierrel
Top Three Tasks to Carry Out/Problems to Address
1. Determine details of three metrics for adaptive sampling (coverage, dynamics, uncertainties) and develop schemes and exercise software for their integrated use
2. Carry out cooperative real-time data-driven predictions with adaptive sampling
3. Advance scientific understanding of 3D upwelling/relaxation dynamics and carry out budget analyses as possible
What Do We Need Most?
• Effective collaboration
• Integrated software
• Good quality data with error estimates
Determine details of three metrics for adaptive sampling and develop schemes and exercise software for their integrated use
1. The three metrics:
i. Coverage (maintain synoptic accuracy)
ii. Dynamics (maximize sampling of predicted dynamical events)
iii. Uncertainty (minimize predicted uncertainties)
2. Integrate these adaptive sampling metrics and schemes with platform control and LCS metrics and schemes
• Multiple platforms of different types used together in overall conceptual framework
3. Adaptive sampling schemes and software in pre-exercise simulations
• Continue development of ESSE and MsEVA nonlinear adaptive sampling
• Implement simple glider/AUV models within HOPS for i) measurement model and ii) data predictions
• Continue development error models for HOPS and for glider/AUV/ship/aircraft data (with experimentalists)
Carry-out real-time data-driven predictions with adaptive sampling
1. Work in real-time with a committed general team of experimentalists and carry out adaptive sampling• Link and/or integrate HOPS with control theory and LCS software
2. Carry out real-time HOPS/ESSE (sub)-mesoscale field and uncertainty predictions with integrated 3-metrics adaptive sampling• 1-way and/or 2-way nested HOPS simulations (333m into 1km into 3km)
• Sub-mesoscale effects including tidal effects
3. Efficient measures and assessment of predictive skill• Real-time forecast skill and hindcast skill of fields and uncertainties
• Theory and software to measure skill of upwelling center/plume estimate: e.g. shape/size of plume, scales of jet and eddies at plume edges, thickness of boundary layers, surface/bottom fluxes
4. Real-time physical-acoustical DA with MIT and real-time biological-physical DA as possible with collaborators
Advance scientific understanding of 3D upwelling/relaxation dynamics and carry-out budget analyses on several scales
1. Develop and implement software for momentum, heat and mass budgets
• On several scales and term-balances: e.g. point-by-point, time-dependent plume-averaged, Ms-EVA, etc.
• Compare data-based budgets to data-model-based budgets
2. Science-focused studies of sensitivity of upwelling/relaxation processes
• e.g. effects of atmospheric conditions and resolution, idealized geometries, tides/internal tides or boundary layer formulations on plume formation and relaxation
3. Improve model parameterizations based on model-data misfits (local and budgets)
4. Estimate predictability limits for upwelling/relaxation processes
What Do We Need Most?
• Effective collaboration, rapid and efficient communication and real integrated system and system software
• Effective integration of software
– LCS with HOPS
– Glider/AUV models with HOPS
• Good forcing functions and good initial conditions
• Real-time inter-calibration data stations to avoid false circulation features
• Occasional and simultaneous sampling by pairs of platforms, efficiently scheduled by real-time control groups
• Documented feedback from experimentalists
• Both in real-time and after experiment
Quantitative Adaptive Sampling via ESSE
1. Select sets of candidate sampling paths/regions and variables that satisfy operational constraints
2. Forecast reduction of errors for each set based on a tree structure of small ensembles and data assimilation
3. Optimization of sampling plan: select sequence of paths/regions and sensor variables which maximize the predicted nonlinear error reduction in the spatial domain of interest, either at tf (trace of ``information matrix’’ at final time) or over [t0 , tf ]
- Outputs:
- Maps of predicted error reduction for each sampling paths/regions
- Information (summary) maps: assigns to the location of each sampling region/path the average error reduction over domain of interest
- Ideal sequence of paths/regions and variables to sample
Which sampling on Aug 26 optimally reduces uncertainties on Aug 27?
4 candidate tracks, overlaid on surface T fct for Aug 26
ESSE fcts after DA of each track
Aug 24 Aug 26 Aug 27
2-day ESSE fct
ESSE for Track 4
ESSE for Track 3
ESSE for Track 2
ESSE for Track 1DA 1
DA 2
DA 3
DA 4
IC(nowcast) Forecast DA
Which sampling on Aug 26 optimally reduces uncertainties on Aug 27?
1. Define relative error reduction as: (27 - 27 ) / 27…..for 27 > noise
0………………for 27 noise
2. Create relative error reduction maps for each sampling tracks, e.g.:
track i
3. Compute average over domain of interest for each variable, e.g. for full domain: Best to worst error reduction: Track 1 (18%), Pt Lobos (17%), …., Track 3 (6%)
4. Create “Aug 26 information map”: indicates where to sample on Aug 26 for optimal error reduction on Aug 27
Large-scale Available Potential Energy (APE) Large-scale Kinetic Energy (KE)
• Both APE and KE decrease during the relaxation period• Transfer from large-scale window to mesoscale window occurs to account for
decrease in large-scale energies (as confirmed by transfer and mesoscale terms)
August 18 August 19 August 20
August 21 August 22 August 23 August 23August 22August 21
August 20August 19August 18
Windows: Large-scale (>= 8days; > 30km), mesoscale (0.5-8 days), and sub-mesoscale (< 0.5 days)
Multi-Scale Energy and Vorticity Analysis
Dr. X. San Liang
• Multiscale window decomposition in space and time (wavelet-based) of energy/vorticity eqns.• For example, consider Energetics During Relaxation Period:
Approaches to Multi-Model Adaptive ForecastingCombine ROMS/HOPS re-analysis temperatures
to fit the M2-buoy temperature at 10 m
By combining the models x1 and x2 we attempt to:1. eliminate and learn systematic errors2. reduce random errors
• Approach utilized here: neural networks• A neural network is a non-linear operator which can be
adapted (trained) to approximate a target arbitrary non-linear function measuring model-data misfits:
Sigmoidal Transfer Function
ii) Single Sigmoidal layer:
Oleg Logoutov
i) Linear least-squares:
d
Two fits tested
Top: Green – HOPS/ROMS reanalysis combined via neural network trained on the first subset of data (before Aug 17).
Bottom: Green – HOPS/ROMS reanalysis combined via adaptive neural network also trained on the first subset of data (before Aug 17), but over moving-window of 3 days decorrelation
Neural Network Least Squares Fit
Linear Least Squares Fit
IndividualModels
Equal Weights
• Observed (black) temp at the M2mooring• Modeled temp at the M2mooring:
ROMS re-analysis, HOPS re-analysis
Extra Vugrafs
ESSE Surface Temperature Error Standard Deviation Forecasts
Aug 12 Aug 13
Aug 27Aug 24
Aug 14
Aug 28
End of Relaxation Second Upwelling period
First Upwelling periodStart of Upwelling
ESSE: Uncertainty Predictions and Data Assimilation
1. Dynamics: dx =M(x)dt+ d ~ N(0, Q)2. Measurement: y = H(x) + ~ N(0, R)
3. Non-lin. Err. Cov. evolution:
4. Error reduction by DA:
QTxxxMxMTxMxMxxdtdP )ˆ)(ˆ()(())ˆ()()(ˆ(/
)()()( PKHIP where K is the reduced Kalman Gain
• ESSE retains and nonlinearly evolves uncertainties that matter, combining,
i. Proper Orthogonal Decompositions (PODs) or Karhunen-Loeve (KL) expansions
ii. Time-varying basis functions, and,
iii. Multi-scale initialisation and Stochastic ensemble predictions
to obtain a dynamic low-dimensional representation of the error space.• Linked to Polynomial chaos, but
with time-varying error KL basis:
P(0)=P0
Adaptive sampling schemes via ESSE
Adaptive Sampling Metric or Cost function:
e.g. Find Hi and Ri such that
dtt
ttPtrMinortPtrMin
f
RiHif
RiHi 0
,,))(())((
Dynamics: dx =M(x)dt+ d ~ N(0, Q)Measurement: y = H(x) + ~ N(0, R)
Non-lin. Err. Cov.:
QTxxxMxMTxMxMxxdtdP )ˆ)(ˆ()(())ˆ()()(ˆ(/
Adaptive Sampling: Use forecasts and their uncertainties to predict the most useful observation system in space (locations/paths) and time (frequencies)
Modeling of tidal effects in HOPS
• Obtain first estimate of principal tidal constituents via a shallow water model1. Global TPXO5 fields (Egbert, Bennett et al.)
2. Nested regional OTIS inversion using tidal-gauges and TPX05 at open-boundary
• Used to estimate hierarchy of tidal parameterizations :i. Vertical tidal Reynolds stresses (diff., visc.) KT = ||uT||2 and K=max(KS, KT)
ii. Modification of bottom stress =CD ||uS+ uT || uS
iii. Horiz. momentum tidal Reyn. stresses (Reyn. stresses averaged over own T)
iv. Horiz. tidal advection of tracers ½ free surface
v. Forcing for free-surface HOPS full free surface
T section across Monterey-BayTemp. at 10 m
No-tides
Two 6-day model runs
Tidal effects• Vert. Reyn.
Stress• Horiz.
Momentum Stress
CHL Aug 20
CHL Aug 21
CHL Aug 22
Post-Cruise Surface CHL forecast (Hindcast)
• Starts from zeroth-order dynamically balanced IC on Aug 4
• Then, 13 days of physical DA
• Forecast of 3-5 days afterwards
CHL Aug 20,
20:00 GMT