28
HARLEY-DAVIDSON STRATEGIC PLAN Submitted by Stacey Wagner Prepared for Professor Don Looney Business Policies and Strategies Spring 2007

Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

HARLEY-DAVIDSON STRATEGIC PLAN

Submitted by

Stacey Wagner

Prepared for

Professor Don Looney Business Policies and Strategies

Spring 2007

Page 2: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

VISION STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 3 MISSION STATEMENT ................................................................................................. 3 EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................... 3

External Audit ................................................................................................................. 3 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis ......................................................................................... 7 External Factor Matrix .................................................................................................... 8

Table 1 ................................................................................................................ 8 Competitive Profile Matrix ............................................................................................. 9

Table 2 ................................................................................................................ 9 INTERNAL ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................... 10

Key Internal Forces ....................................................................................................... 10 Financial Ratio Analysis ............................................................................................... 12

Table 3 .............................................................................................................. 12 Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix ................................................................................. 16

Table 4 .............................................................................................................. 16 SWOT MATRIX ............................................................................................................. 17

Table 5 .............................................................................................................. 17 SPACE MATRIX ............................................................................................................ 18

Table 6 .............................................................................................................. 18 GRAND STRATEGY MATRIX ................................................................................... 20

Table 7 .............................................................................................................. 20 LONG-TERM OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES ................................................... 21 ANNUAL OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................... 21 PRO-FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS .............................................................. 22

Table 8 .............................................................................................................. 23 Table 9 .............................................................................................................. 25 Table 10 ............................................................................................................ 26

BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................... 28

Page 3: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

3

VISION STATEMENT

We at Harley-Davidson are a worldwide manufacturer of motorcycles and related

products and focus on providing a unique lifestyle for our customers.

MISSION STATEMENT

At Harley-Davidson, we provide our customers around the world with an

aggressive outdoor lifestyle through superior products and service. Through modern

technology, we provide the latest in safety and environmentally friendly engineering in

our products. We focus on safety and harmony within the workplace. At Harley-

Davidson, we do not simply sell motorcycles; we improve our customers’ lives through

recreational opportunities.

EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT

External Audit

An external audit assesses the industry that Harley-Davidson operates in. The

U.S. motorcycle market value grew 7.7% from 2001-2005. Market volume grew 6.4% in

the same time. The U.S. market accounts for 25% of the global motorcycle market.

Honda and Yamaha are the other leading competitors, next to Harley-Davidson, in the

U.S. market. Market value is expected to grow 7.1% from 2005-2010. Market volume is

expected to grow 7.5% in the same time period.1

The motorcycle market value in Europe declined .8% from 2001-2005. Market

volume also decreased 1.6% in the same time period. More moped products are sold in

Europe than motorcycles. Honda and Yamaha have the largest market share in Europe.

1 “Motorcycles in the United States,” DataMonitor, November 2006.

Page 4: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

4

Future market value is expected to increase 4.4% from 2005-2010. Market volume is

expected to increase 4.5%.2

From 2001-2005, market value for motorcycles in the Asia/Pacific region grew

9.2%. Market volume grew 8.3%. Two-thirds of products sold there are motorcycles;

one-third are mopeds. Honda has the largest market share. It is expected that market

value will increase 13.2% from 2005-2010, while market volume increases 9%.3

Other external factors that may affect Harley-Davidson include the economy.

Economic factors include the stock market, interest rates, inflation, and unemployment

levels. In the past year, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has risen 16%.4 Interest rates

increased only marginally in the same amount of time.5 Unemployment remained

unchanged at 4.4% in the last year. Inflation was up 2%.6 Overall, these factors indicate

a fairly strong U.S. economy and based on recent trends, this expected to continue.

Other external factors affecting Harley-Davidson include social, cultural, and

demographic changes. The average Harley owner is 47 years old and makes over

$80,000 per year.7 The U.S. population increased 1% from 2004 to 2005, while the

population over age 62 increased more than 2.5%. The median age of the U.S.

population increased from 36.2 to 36.4 in the same time period. The number of married

couples without children under the age of 18 stayed constant. The mean household

income increased over 4% to $62,556.8 As aging couples with excess income are Harley-

2 “Motorcycles in Europe,” DataMonitor, November 2006. 3 “Motorcycles in Asia-Pacific,” DataMonitor, November 2006. 4 CNN Money, <http://money.cnn.com>, accessed on April 17, 2007. 5 Federal Reserve, <http://federalreserve.gov>, accessed on April 17, 2007. 6 Bureau of Labor Statistics, <http://www.bls.gov>, accessed on April 17, 2007. 7 Harley-Davidson Investor Relations, <http://investor.harley-davidson.com>, accessed on March 13, 2007. 8 U.S. Census Bureau, <http://factfinder.census.gov>, accessed on April 17, 2007.

Page 5: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

5

Davidson’s target market, the aging population growth and income growth are good signs

for the company.

The U.S. veteran population has increased by 1.1%.9 Veterans tend to be

motorcycle owners, and an increasing veteran population may be sign of market segment

growth for Harley.10 Another area of untapped segment of growth for Harley is women.

Over four million women have owned a motorcycle in the past, but only 635,000

currently do.11 Only 11% of Harley’s current buyers are female, but they are increasing

by .5% per year.12

Political, governmental and legal changes are important as well. The

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates automobile and motorcycle emissions.

These regulations were most recently revised in 2004. 13 Future revisions could

negatively impact the motorcycle industry. Another concern is the price of raw materials

for motorcycles. Steel prices increased 57% from 2003 to 2004, and aluminum increased

by 24% in the same time period.14 Further increases could force motorcycle companies

to pass the cost increases on to consumers, thus raising the price of the product.

Technology is constantly evolving. The widespread use of the Internet has

changed the way business is done. Communication across continents is easier and

cheaper than ever before. Computer-based inventory control systems could play a role in

managing motorcycle inventories. Currently Harley does not allow for transfer of

product between dealers, but a centralized computer system could make for an easy

9 U.S. Census Bureau, <http://factfinder.census.gov>, accessed on April 17, 2007. 10 Jim Burgess (Black Hills Harley-Davidson), speech given at Black Hills State University, March 27, 2007. 11 Sheila Seger (Lehman Trikes), personal interview, April 20, 2007. 12 Harley-Davidson Investor Relations, <http://investor.harley-davidson.com>, accessed on March 13, 2007. 13 Environmental Protection Agency, <http://www.epa.gov>, accessed on April 17, 2007. 14 “Company Spotlight: Harley-Davidson Motor Company,” DataMonitor, October 2006.

Page 6: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

6

transition.15 Technology also impacts design. Today’s motorcycles are more reliable

because of technological change. Modern motorcycles also are relatively free of oil

leaks, vibration, and are more comfortable than those of the past.16

Although Harley-Davidson has many competitors, its main competitors are Honda

and Yamaha based on their world-wide market share. Because Harley’s competitors are

more diversified, they are less vulnerable to industry changes. Honda and Yamaha also

offer products that sell well in the international markets compared to Harley. 17 Harley

products are more expensive than its competitors, but are known for service and

salability.18

Models of motorcycles available include custom, touring, performance, and

standard models. Custom is the largest market segment in the U.S., with 53.9% of all

motorcycles on the road. However, touring bikes have increased in popularity with each

year, now comprising 27.2% of registered bikes. From 2004 to 2005, this increase was

over 30%.19 Touring motorcycles are the most luxurious and easiest to ride of all models.

These models often include radios and cruise control. Victory, Honda, Suzuki, and

Harley have expanded their touring line of motorcycles to cater to the aging market.

Harley offers eight variations of the touring motorcycle.20

Victory entered into an agreement with Lehman Trikes to produce three-wheeled

motorcycles under the Victory brand. These products will be fully supported by Victory

warranty, and will be marketed to aging adults as a safer way to ride. The “Pit Boss” was

15 Jim Burgess (Black Hills Harley-Davidson), speech given at Black Hills State University, March 27, 2007. 16 Sheila Seger (Lehman Trikes), personal interview, April 20, 2007. 17 “Company Spotlight: Harley-Davidson Motor Company,” DataMonitor, October 2006. 18 Sheila Seger (Lehman Trikes), personal interview, April 20, 2007. 19 Harley-Davidson Investor Relations, <http://investor.harley-davidson.com>, accessed on March 13, 2007. 20 Sheila Seger (Lehman Trikes), personal interview, April 20, 2007.

Page 7: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

7

released for sale on July 31, 2006. Harley entered a similar agreement with Lehman

Trikes on September 1, 2006.21

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

The overall attractiveness of the motorcycle industry is average. The threat of

new competitors or supplier power is low, but consumers have the power to switch

brands and substitute products easily. There is also competition for market share among

rivals in the motorcycle industry.22

Rivalry among competing firms is fairly high in the motorcycle industry. Brand

image is very important in the industry and products frequently compete directly with a

product of another manufacturer. Potential entry of new competitors is somewhat low in

motorcycle manufacturing because of start-up costs and loyalty already established by

existing firms. It would be a difficult task to gain market share from the existing giants in

the motorcycle business. The bargaining power of suppliers is a relatively small threat as

there are more suppliers than manufacturers.

Potential development of substitute products is a threat to the motorcycle industry.

Replacement products for motorcycles include boats, snowmobiles, and RVs because

these are all luxury recreational items. Motorcycle consumers are likely to weigh a

purchase decision against a substitute product. Motorcycle consumers tend to fit a

specific demographic profile and have discretionary income; therefore, the entire

population is not a potential buyer. Thus, the bargaining power of consumers is also a

threat to motorcycle companies. 23

21 Sheila Seger (Lehman Trikes), personal interview, April 20, 2007. 22 “Company Spotlight: Harley-Davidson Motor Company,” DataMonitor, October 2006. 23 Ibid.

Page 8: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

8

External Factor Matrix

Table 1

EFE Matrix Key External Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score Opportunities 1. Aging U.S. Population .20 4 .80 2. Strong U.S./Canadian market growth .20 4 .80 3. Increasing number of women riders .10 2 .20 4. Very strong growth in Asia .03 1 .03 5. Very strong growth in Mexico .03 1 .03 Threats 6. Aging U.S. Population .04 2 .08 7. Competitors are more diversified .10 1 .10 8. Union relations .05 2 .10 9. Declining European growth .05 2 .10 10. Availability of substitute products .20 1 .20 Total 1.0 2.44

Harley-Davidson excels at focusing on the baby-boomer motorcycle market

segment in the U.S.; however there are several opportunities that Harley is not using to its

full advantage. Very strong growth in the motorcycle industry is occurring in Asia and

Mexico, yet Harley-Davidson has not fully taken advantage of this market.24 Increasing

numbers of women ride motorcycles and yet only ten percent of Harley riders are

women. 25 These could be areas of potential growth for Harley.

Threats to Harley-Davidson include an aging U.S. population. While this factor is

considered an opportunity as well, it is a threat as the population ages and is eventually

unable to operate a motorcycle, thus extinguishing Harley’s largest market segment. The

contract with Lehman Trikes could counteract some of this effect. Though not a

significant threat because of Harley’s limited market share, the European motorcycle

24 “Motorcycles in Asia-Pacific,” DataMonitor, November 2006. 25 “Company Spotlight: Harley-Davidson Motor Company,” DataMonitor, October 2006.

Page 9: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

9

industry is suffering from declining growth. Harley-Davidson competitors are more

diversified into markets other than motorcycles, which makes them less vulnerable to

fluctuations in the motorcycle industry.26 Also, relations with union workers are a threat

to the industry.27 The readily available substitute products to motorcycles are the biggest

threat to the industry and to Harley-Davidson.

Competitive Profile Matrix

Table 2

Competitive Profile Matrix Harley-Davidson Honda Yamaha

Critical Success Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score

Rating Weighted Score

Rating Weighted Score

Market share .15 3 .45 3 .45 3 .45

Financial position .05 4 .20 3 .15 3 .15

Price competitiveness .10 1 .10 3 .30 3 .30

Customer loyalty .20 4 .80 2 .40 2 .40

Global expansion .20 2 .40 4 .80 4 .80

Product quality .10 3 .30 4 .40 3 .30

Product selection .15 2 .30 4 .60 4 .60

Management .05 4 .20 4 .20 4 .20

Total 1.0 2.75 3.30 3.20

Customer loyalty is Harley-Davidson’s strongest competitive advantage. In

product quality and financial position, Harley is also strong. However, Harley is not as

strong as its competitors in some critical areas. Harley falls far behind Honda and

Yamaha in global market share of motorcycle products. In addition, Harley motorcycles

are not as competitively priced as other brands. Product selection is another area of

26 “Company Spotlight: Harley-Davidson Motor Company,” DataMonitor, October 2006. 27 Jim Burgess (Black Hills Harley-Davidson), speech given at Black Hills State University, March 27, 2007.

Page 10: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

10

weakness at Harley. While offering many products in the 1000cc+ category of

motorcycles, Harley lacks an array of smaller bikes. Also, Harley is not diversified into

other recreational lines such as watercraft and ATVs as many of its competitors are and is

thus more susceptible to fluctuations in the motorcycle market.28

INTERNAL ASSESSMENT

Key Internal Forces To determine Harley-Davidson’s strengths and weaknesses, an internal

assessment is required. Areas to be evaluated include: management, marketing, finance,

production and operations, research and development, and management information

systems (MIS).

Harley-Davidson offers a broad selection of 32 product models, has 650 dealers in

the U.S., and has the largest market share in the U.S. However, Harley only has 7.7% of

European market share (the second largest motorcycle market in the world), and 25.3%

of the Asia/Pacific region.29 Clearly, Harley-Davidson’s strengths are in the U.S. market,

as 80% of Harley’s net revenue comes from U.S. sales.30

Harley worked to improve its image over the years. In the 1960s, Harley was

viewed as sub-par when compared to British motorcycles. In the modern market, Harley

has a reputation for style and quality. Credit for this is due to the research and

development department, who implemented the trend towards quality for the company.

28 “Company Spotlight: Harley-Davidson Motor Company,” DataMonitor, October 2006. 29 Ibid. 30 Harley-Davidson Investor Relations, <http://investor.harley-davidson.com>, accessed on March 13, 2007.

Page 11: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

11

Harley-Davidson also introduced water-cooled engines, fuel injection, and catalytic

converters to improve exhaust emissions.31

Brand image is critical in the motorcycle industry, and Harley’s strength in this

area is largely due to its marketing abilities in the U.S. market. Harley customers are

extremely loyal to their brand and 90% of Harley owners intend to purchase another

Harley. The production and operations department at Harley-Davidson has consistently

built reliable motorcycles for Harley customers. This consistency has helped sustain

brand image.32

Harley’s internal management and finance department is strong. Harley is a

financially sound company, largely due to effective management.33

Management information systems could be used to more effectively manage

inventory at Harley. Instead of allotting a certain number of products to each dealer,

Harley could use an enterprise-wide system to match inventory levels to demand. This is

currently one of Harley-Davidson’s few internal weaknesses. 34

31 Jim Burgess (Black Hills Harley-Davidson), speech given at Black Hills State University, March 27, 2007. 32 “Company Spotlight: Harley-Davidson Motor Company,” DataMonitor, October 2006. 33 Jim Burgess (Black Hills Harley-Davidson), speech given at Black Hills State University, March 27, 2007. 34 Ibid.

Page 12: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

12

Financial Ratio Analysis

Table 3

Financial Ratio Analysis Ratio Harley-

Davidson 2006

Harley-Davidson

2005

Harley-Davidson

2004

Honda 2006

Industry Average

Liquidity Ratios Current Ratio 2.23 3.6 2.79 1.07 2.04 Quick Ratio 1.56 2.18 1.37 .81 1.45 Leverage Ratios Debt to Equity Ratio .62 .39 .40 .87 .45 Long Term Debt to Equity Ratio .32 .32 .25 .39 .32 Times Interest Earned Ratio N/A N/A N/A 2.37 7.15 Activity Ratios Inventory Turnover 24.29 25.31 24.42 10.69 8.26 Fixed Assets Turnover 6.08 5.57 5.12 5.83 N/A Total Assets Turnover 1.15 1.06 1.02 1.00 1.25 Accounts Receivable Turnover 3.09 3.67 4.34 4.90 10.56 Profitability Ratios Gross Profit Margin 39.50 N/A N/A 28.60 41.82 Operating Profit Margin 25.91 N/A N/A 8.70 15.60 Net Profit Margin 16.86 N/A N/A 4.89 10.17 Return on Total Assets 19.34 17.87 17.05 4.87 12.28 Return on Stockholders’ Equity 35.72 30.45 28.73 15.29 23.72 Price Earnings Ratio 15.81 N/A N/A 12.36 20.30 Growth Ratios Sales 9.02 N/A N/A 14.95 5.67 Earnings Per Share 15.25 N/A N/A 36.18 14.30 Dividends Per Share 1.33 N/A N/A .76 1.84 Source: <http://www.reuters.com>, accessed on March 13, 2007.

Page 13: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

13

Liquidity Ratios

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

2004 2005 2006

Current Ratio

Quick Ratio

Liquidity ratios measure a firm’s ability to turn short-term assets into cash.35

Harley-Davidson is doing better than the industry average in this category and

significantly better than its main competitor, Honda.

Leverage Ratios

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

2004 2005 2006

Debt to Equity Ratio

Long Term Debt toEquity Ratio

35 Fred R. David, Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, 11th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2007.

Page 14: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

14

Leverage ratios measure how much a firm is financed by debt.36 Harley-

Davidson is fairly close to the industry average on this measure, and is doing better than

Honda.

Activity Ratios

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2004 2005 2006

Inventory Turnover

Fixed AssetsTurnover

Total Assets Turnover

Accounts ReceivableTurnover

Activity ratios measure how well a firm uses its resources.37 Harley is doing

especially well in inventory turnover, but falls below average in accounts receivable.

36 Fred R. David, Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, 11th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2007. 37 Ibid.

Page 15: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

15

Profitability Ratios

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2004 2005 2006

Return on TotalAssets

Return onStockholders’ Equity

Profitability ratios measure the effectiveness of management.38 Again, Harley is

doing much better than the industry and Honda in almost all of these measures with the

exception of the price earnings ratio and the gross profit margin, which fall a bit below

industry standards, although still ahead of Honda.

Growth ratios measure growth over a period of time.39 Harley is doing better than

the industry average in sales and earnings per share growth, but Honda is doing even

better. In dividends per share growth, Harley beats Honda, but both fall below industry

average. Clearly Harley-Davidson has financial strengths, but there are some areas to be

targeted for improvement.

38 Fred R. David, Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, 11th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2007. 39 Ibid.

Page 16: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

16

Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix

Table 4

IFE Matrix Strengths Weight Rating Weighted Score 1. Customer retention .20 4 .80 2. Number of domestic dealers .15 4 .60 3. Domestic market share .15 4 .60 4. Product selection of +1000 cc motorcycles .10 4 .40 5. Financial position .10 4 .40 Weaknesses 6. International market share .10 1 .10 7. Number of international dealers .03 2 .06 8. Product selection in other segments .10 1 .10 9. Dealer inventory system .05 2 .10 10. Product cost .02 1 .02 Total 1.0 3.18 Harley-Davidson has a large number of repeat buyers. Harley has a large volume

of dealers in the U.S. and a large share of the U.S. market of motorcycle sales. The

company also offers several different products to suit different needs in the over 1000cc

category. However, Harley is much weaker in both Europe and Asia in number of

dealers and market share. One of the likely reasons for this is Harley’s limited offering

of smaller bikes that are more popular in international markets. Also, Harley’s brand

image in the U.S. is much more powerful to consumers than it is internationally.

Page 17: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

17

SWOT MATRIX

Table 5

SWOT Matrix Strengths – S

1. Customer retention 2. Financial position 3. Product selection 4. U.S. market share 5. U.S. dealer network

Weaknesses – W 1. Dealer inventory system 2. International market share 3. Expensive product 4. Product selection 5. International dealers

Opportunities – O 1. Increasing # of women riders 2. U.S. industry growth 3. Aging population 4. Mexico industry growth 5. Asian industry growth

SO Strategies 1. Continue to expand U.S. market share (S4, O2) 2. Expand marketing to female riders (S1, O1) 3. Expand marketing to baby boomers (S1, O3)

WO Strategies 1. Balance inventory levels to meet demand (W1, O2) 2. Pursue foreign markets more aggressively (W2, O4, O5) 3. Expand product line to cater to female and aging riders (W4, O1, O3)

Threats – T 1. Union relations 2. Aging U.S. population 3. Competitor diversification 4. Declining European growth 5. Availability of substitutes

ST Strategies 1. Focus on securing new markets as baby boomers age (S4, T2) 2. Focus market growth in the U.S. rather than European markets (S4, T4)

WT Strategies 1. Expand product line to compete directly with competitors (W4, T3) 2. Open foreign factory to gain international market share and lessen reliance on unions (W2, T1)

Page 18: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

18

SPACE MATRIX

Table 6

SPACE Matrix Ratings Financial Strength (FS) Leverage +6 Liquidity +4 Return on investment +3 Working capital +4 Industry Strength (IS) Growth potential +5 Profit potential +4 Capacity utilization +4 Ease of entry +5 Environmental Stability (ES) Competitive pressures -4 Risk -2 Price range of competing products -5 Demand fluctuations -2 Competitive Advantage (CA) Market share -2 Loyalty -1 Product life cycle -1 Product quality -1 Conclusion ES Average (-13/4) -3.25 CA Average (-5/4) -1.25 IS Average (18/4) +4.50 FS Average (17/4) +4.25 x-axis (CA + IS) +3.25 y-axis (ES + FS) +1.00

Page 19: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

19

Conservative FS Aggressive +6 +5 +4 +3 +2 +1 X CA -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 IS -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 Defensive ES Competitive Harley-Davidson falls into the aggressive quadrant of the SPACE Matrix.

Aggressive strategies include market penetration and development, product development,

backward, forward, and horizontal integration, related and unrelated diversification, and

combination strategies.40

40 Fred R. David, Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, 11th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2007.

Page 20: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

20

GRAND STRATEGY MATRIX

Table 7

Grand Strategy Matrix

Rapid Market Growth Quadrant II Quadrant I X Weak Strong Competitive Competitive Position Position Quadrant III Quadrant IV

Slow Market Growth Harley-Davidson is in Quadrant I of the Grand Strategy Matrix because of its

strong competitive position in the motorcycle market as well as the market’s strong

growth. The motorcycle industry is growing world-wide, and in some markets, growth is

quite strong. Harley has a very strong competitive position in North American markets,

and has a presence in international markets. According to this matrix, Harley would be

Page 21: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

21

wise to pursue market development strategies, market penetration, product development,

forward, backward, and horizontal integration, as well as related diversification.41

LONG-TERM OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES

Long-term objectives will attempt to sustain Harley-Davidson’s competitive

advantage and keep it a viable competitor in the motorcycle industry.42 For the next three

years, Harley should use its current strengths to expand its U.S. market share through

market penetration, expand sales to female riders through market development, revise the

U.S. dealer network to allow for transfer of units between dealers to improve market

penetration and expand its product line to cater to aging riders through product

development.

Market penetration seeks to increase market share for present products in present

markets through greater marketing efforts. Market development introduces present

products into new markets. Product development increases sales by developing or

improving products.43

ANNUAL OBJECTIVES

To ensure Harley-Davidson’s long-term objectives are achieved, annual

objectives are matched to long-term objectives.44 To expand U.S. market share through

market penetration, Harley will set an annual objective to grow U.S. sales by 15% by

May 31, 2008. Also, $5,000,000 will be allocated to marketing efforts to ensure

attainment of this goal. Although this is an annual objective, it is anticipated this

41 Fred R. David, Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, 11th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2007. 42 Ibid. 43 Ibid. 44 Ibid.

Page 22: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

22

objective could be modified slightly for each of the next three years as needed to achieve

U.S. market penetration.

To expand sales to female riders through market and product development, Harley

will set an annual objective to double the number of female Harley buyers in the U.S. to

20% of total buyers by May 31, 2008. Also, Harley’s marketing budget for targeting

female riders will be increased by $5,000,000. Again, this is an annual objective, but it is

anticipated this objective could be modified slightly for each of the next three years as

needed to strengthen Harley’s number of female buyers.

Harley will aim to improve its U.S. dealer network to allow for transfer of units

between dealers to improve market penetration. The date for this objective to be

complete is by December 31, 2007. Enhancements will be made to the current inventory

management system as needed until this goal is reached. Input will be largely based on

dealer and management input.

To expand its product line to cater to aging riders through product development,

Harley will set an annual objective of introducing one new product for aging riders by

May 31, 2008. This product may be built through the contract with Lehman Trikes.

PRO-FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In order to implement objectives, Harley-Davidson will need to determine the cost

of implementation for each objective. Expanding its U.S. market share will increase

gross profit by approximately $400,000 annually. Repairing the U.S. dealer network will

result in $50,000 less inventory on hand each year. Expanding the product line to cater to

aging riders will contribute to increased operating expenses of about $90,000 but will

also contribute to the increase in gross profit.

Page 23: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

23

Table 8

Pro Forma Balance Sheet (Values in Thousands) 12/31/2006 12/31/2007 12/31/2008 12/31/2009 Assets Current Assets Cash and Equivalents 238,397 250,000 250,000 250,000 Short Term Investments 658,133 660,000 660,000 660,000 Net Receivables 143,049 145,000 145,000 145,000 Finance Receivables held for sale 547,106 550,000 550,000 550,000 Finance Receivables held for investment 1,554,260 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Inventory 287,798 250,000 200,000 150,000 Other Current Assets 121,890 120,000 120,000 120,000 Total Current Assets 3,550,633 3,475,000 3,425,000 3,375,000 Long Term Investments Finance Receivables held for investment 725,957 750,000 750,000 750,000 Other Long-Term Assets 1,255,560 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 Total Non-Current Assets 1,981,517 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Total Assets 5,532,150 5,475,000 5,425,000 5,375,000 Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Current Liabilities Accounts Payable 763,186 760,000 760,000 760,000 Current Portion of Finance Debt 832,491 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 Total Current Liabilities 1,595,677 1,760,000 1,860,000 1,960,000 Non-Current Liabilities

Page 24: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

24

Finance Debt 870,000 870,000 870,000 870,000 Postretirement Health Care Benefits 201,126 200,000 200,000 200,000 Other Long-Term Liabilities 108,610 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total Non-Current Liabilities 1,179,736 1,170,000 1,170,000 1,170,000 Total Liabilities 2,775,413 2,930,000 3,030,000 3,130,000 Total Shareholders’ Equity 2,756,737 2,545,000 2,395,000 2,245,000 Total Liabilities & Shareholders’ Equity 5,532,150 5,475,000 5,425,000 5,375,000 Notes: Inventory on hand will decrease by $50,000 per year when the new inventory adjustment system is implemented. Liabilities will increase by borrowing short-term funds to increase sales and marketing efforts in the U.S. at $100,000 per year.

Source: <http://investor.harley-davidson.com>, accessed on March 13, 2007.

Page 25: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

Table 9

Pro Forma Income Statement

(Values in Thousands) 12/31/2006 12/31/2007 12/31/2008 12/31/2009 Total Revenue 5,800,686 6,670,000 7,670,000 8,821,000 Cost of Revenue, Total 3,567,839 4,102,000 4,717,000 5,424,000 Gross Profit 2,232,847 2,568,000 2,953,000 3,397,000 HDMC Operating Expenses 818,490 900,000 990,000 1,090,000 Corporate Operating Expenses 22,561 23,000 24,000 25,000 Total Operating Expenses 841,051 923,000 1,014,000 1,115,000 HDMC Operating Income 1,414,357 1,668,000 1,963,000 2,307,000 HDFS Operating Income 210,724 217,000 223,000 230,000 Operating Income 1,602,520 1,885,000 2,186,000 2,537,000 Total Other Income/Expenses Net 21,720 22,000 22,000 22,000 Earnings Before Interest and Taxes 1,624,240 1,907,000 2,208,000 2,559,000 Income Tax Expense 581,087 680,000 788,000 913,000 Net Income from Continuing Operations 1,043,153 1,227,000 1,420,000 1,646,000 Net Income 1,043,153 1,227,000 1,420,000 1,646,000 Notes: Anticipated total revenue will increase by 15% because of sales volume increase of 15%. COGS will stay fixed at 61.5% of revenue. Operating expenses will increase 10% to cover new R&D expenses. Corporate expenses will increase 3% to cover inflation. HDFS will increase 3% per year to cover inflation. Income tax rate will stay fixed at 35.7%.

Source: <http://investor.harley-davidson.com>, accessed on March 13, 2007.

Page 26: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

Table 10

Balanced Scorecard Objectives Measure or

TargetTime

Expectation Primary

Responsibility Customers Increase number of female buyers 20% of total

Harley sales May 2008 Sales/Marketing

Increase U.S. market share 15% sales increase

May 2008 Sales/Marketing

Pursue foreign markets 10% sales increase

July 2009 Sales/Marketing

Managers/Employees Improve management/union relations Complete

negotiations before contract expiration

By end of next contract expiration

Management

Conduct an employee benefits review and add programs currently not offered but desired by employees

Review current benefits offerings with employees

May 2008 Human Resources

Form a team to evaluate foreign factory locations

Formation of team

December 2007

Management

Operations/Processes Negotiate supplier contracts to gain favorable terms and exclusivity where possible (if not already in place)

Set up contracts with current suppliers and renegotiate existing contracts

July 2010 Procurement

Conduct an operations process analysis to look for efficiency improvements

Document each functional process

July 2009 Operations Supervisors

Improve U.S. dealer network by implementing a computerized inventory system

Allow for transfer of product between dealers

December 2007

Management/MIS

Community/Social Responsibility Offer volunteering opportunities for employees

Implement volunteering program

December 2007

Human Resources

Donate percentage of profits to community charities

Determine charities in cities of operations

December 2007

Management

Implement corporate recycling of all materials

Institute bins for products not currently being recycled

December 2007

Human Resources

Page 27: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

27

Business Ethics/Natural EnvironmentMeet or beat all emissions standards Comply with all

current and future emissions standards

May 2008 Research and Development

Comply with noise regulations Comply with all noise ordinances

July 2009 Research and Development

Conduct annual audits in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Conduct yearly audit

December 2007

Finance

Financial Increase U.S. sales 15% sales

increase May 2008 Sales/Marketing

Increase sales to female riders 20% of total Harley sales

May 2008 Sales/Marketing

Increase international sales 10% sales increase

July 2009 Sales/Marketing

The Balanced Scorecard allows for a balance of priorities between short and long term

goals, as well as among stakeholders and management.45 A copy of the scorecard is distributed

to every department to ensure accountability for each department’s goals. Progress meetings will

be conducted every quarter with all accountable parties in attendance. Executive management

will be responsible for ensuring that all goals are implemented in a timely manner.

45 Fred R. David, Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, 11th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2007.

Page 28: Harley Davidson Strategic Plan

28

BIBLIOGRAPHY Bureau of Labor Statistics, <http://www.bls.gov>, accessed on April 17, 2007. CNN Money, <http://money.cnn.com>, accessed on April 17, 2007. “Company Spotlight: Harley-Davidson Motor Company,” DataMonitor, October 2006. Fred R. David, Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, 11th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall,

New Jersey, 2007. Environmental Protection Agency, <http://www.epa.gov>, accessed on April 17, 2007. Federal Reserve, <http://federalreserve.gov>, accessed on April 17, 2007. Harley-Davidson Investor Relations, <http://investor.harley-davidson.com>, accessed on March

13, 2007. Jim Burgess (Black Hills Harley-Davidson), speech given at Black Hills State University, March

27, 2007. “Motorcycles in Asia-Pacific,” DataMonitor, November 2006. “Motorcycles in Europe,” DataMonitor, November 2006. “Motorcycles in the United States,” DataMonitor, November 2006. Motorcycle Industry Financials, <http://www.reuters.com>, accessed on March 13, 2007. Sheila Seger (Lehman Trikes), personal interview, April 20, 2007. U.S. Census Bureau, <http://factfinder.census.gov>, accessed on April 17, 2007.